DOCSLIB.ORG

PURPOSE of REPORT Since This Proposal Is Classed As a 'Major

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PURPOSE of REPORT Since This Proposal Is Classed As a 'Major PLANNING APPLICATIONS BOARD 10 December 2019 COMHAIRLE NAN EILEAN SIAR 11 December 2019 19/00273/PPPM – DEEP WATER PORT, ARNISH ISLE OF LEWIS. APPLICATION FOR PLANNING PERMISSION IN PRINCIPLE TO ERECT BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCT ASSOCIATED WORKS FOR INDUSTRIAL, HEAVY ENGINEERING, FABRICATION AND DECOMMISSIONING (CLASS 5), AND STORAGE/DISTRIBUTION (CLASS 6) AND TO CONSTRUCT A PRIMARY MEANS OF ACCESS, PROVIDE A CULVERT UNDER THE ACCESS ROAD, REMOVE AN EXISTING CULVERT, AND RE-USE EXCAVATED PEAT; ALL ASSOCIATED WITH RECLAIMED/LEVELLED AREAS OF LAND FORMING PART OF THE CREATION OF A DEEP WATER PORT (SUBJECT OF THE STORNOWAY PORT AUTHORITY HARBOUR ORDER 2019) Report by Head of Economic Development and Planning PURPOSE OF REPORT Since this proposal is classed as a ‘Major Development’ in terms of the Town and Country Planning (Hierarchy of Developments) (Scotland) Regulations 2009, this matter cannot be dealt with under delegated powers and is presented to the Comhairle for a decision. COMPETENCE 1.1 There are no legal, financial, equalities or other constraints to the recommendations being implemented. SUMMARY 2.1 The Stornoway Harbour - Deep Water Port (DWP), is a key project of the Stornoway Port Masterplan, a 20 year development framework for the Port of Stornoway. The project being within the limits of a statutory harbour and on the coastal zone, is the subject of a multi- faceted consenting regime. This comprises an anticipated grant of a Marine Licence (ML) for the extent of the works sited below Mean High Water Springs, permitted development rights enjoyed by a Harbour Authority (their scope referenced within the Stornoway Port Authority Harbour Order 2019 (HRO)) and, for Phase 1 of the development only, this application for a Planning Permission in Principle (PPP). 2.2 This application for PPP relates to particular elements only; the construction of the primary access road leading from the Arnish Road into the DWP, the development of buildings and associated works for storage/distribution and heavy industrial uses (the engineering works to deliver the platform on which the buildings would be erected would benefit from permitted development rights) and also the reuse/placement of displaced peat. 2.3 The project, being a Major Development, was subject to pre-application consultation with the local community. This resulted in a high level of participation. No third party input was received from the subsequent public consultation on the planning application, indicating that the community does not have concerns about the proposal. 2.4 The development would deliver on a long term ambition of the Stornoway Port Authority to develop a deep water berth at Glumaig Bay. When all planning matters are considered, the main concern that arises from the assessment is that from a visual amenity perspective there will, in the long term operational stage, be a significant adverse visual effect from a number of viewpoints (around the enclosed harbour and within 1.8km of the site) on various receptors including the coastal character area, as a result of the development of the overall DWP. In terms of this planning application that has to be balanced against the fact that the significant engineering and marine works are consented by others, that Stornoway Harbour is identified by the Scottish Government as a key Scottish Port with development potential, and the assessment of options found Glumaig Bay to be the only suitable site on account of water depth. 2.5 The DWP project would help realise the identified potential by creating new opportunities for the berthing of larger shipping including cruise liners as well as potential for warehousing and heavy engineering work all with attendant economic benefits for the Outer Hebrides and more specifically Stornoway. 2.6 The associated creation of development land would provide an opportunity to accommodate uses which are dependent on access to suitable berthing and incompatible with the limited sites available within the traditional industrial areas in and around Stornoway. These developments, if realised, would result in economic, social, community, and environmental benefits. 2.7 The proposal which is the subject to an application for PPP is a relatively small part of the overall DWP development. It has been subject to Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and a robust examination of the EIA findings. It has been assessed against the Outer Hebrides Local Development Plan (OHLDP) and subject to management of a number of issues and impacts by conditions considered to be compliant. Furthermore, the material considerations of NPF3, SPP, N-RIP and Planning Policy and guidance all lend weight to an approval in accordance with the Development Plan. 2.8 In conclusion, the development has been assessed against the OHLDP and considered to comply with its provisions. Material considerations have also been considered. Overall, the assessment concludes that the application be recommended for approval subject to conditions. 2.9 In order to accommodate the uncertainties around timescale for implementation of this major infrastructure development, the developer seeks to extend the time period for making an application for the matters specified by condition on the PPP, from the standard three years provided by Section 59(2) of the Act, to five years. 2.10 It is accepted that there are variables that could lead to a delay are variables that could lead to a delay in the detailed design and resultant information to satisfy conditions on the PPP and it is therefore proposed that a Direction be made. RECOMMENDATIONS 3.1 It is recommended that (a) the application be APPROVED subject to: (i) the conditions set out in Appendix 1 to the Report; and (ii) implementation of mitigation set out in Appendix 2 to the Report. (b) a Direction be made under Section 59 (5) of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, the effect of which would be to direct that the period of 3 years in Subsection 59 (2) (a) (i) of the Act is not to apply in respect of the Permission, and that the Application for the approval mentioned in Section 59(1) (b) must be made before the expiration of 5 years from the date upon which this permission is granted. Contact Officer: Morag Ferguson [email protected] Tel 01870 604990 Ext 330838 Appendices: 1 Schedule of Proposed Conditions 2 Schedule of Proposed Mitigation 3 Location, Site Plan and Plan of Peat reinstatement areas Background Papers: None BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL 4.1 The application relates to specific aspects of the development of a Deep Water Port, an ambitious project, central to the Stornoway Port masterplan (which sets a framework for the development of Stornoway Port for the next 20 years, the masterplan referenced within the Outer Hebrides Local Development Plan 2018 (Policy STY3)). The Deep Water Port would be located within the limits of Stornoway Harbour in and around Glumaig Bay sited across the bay from the current piers, due north/north-west of the former Arnish Fabrication Yard. 4.2 The wider Stornoway Deep Water Port project is the subject of a multi- faceted consenting regime including an anticipated grant of a Marine Licence (ML) for the extent of the works sited below Mean High Water Springs, planning permitted development rights arising from the making, by Scottish Ministers, of the Stornoway Port Authority Harbour Revision Order 2019 (‘HRO’) and this application for a Planning Permission in Principle (PPP). 4.3 The major engineering works to construct the Stornoway Deep Water Port (the blasting/extraction of rock and the levelling of land associated with Phases 1 to 4 of the port development (laydown, storage and heavy lift areas, marshalling areas, HGV/Lorry Parking areas, car parking areas, internal access, vehicle turning areas, services, and related drainage infrastructure) the construction of a secondary link road by the coast, the dredging and reclamation of land, provision of quayage - along the eastern edge of the levelled/reclaimed area, quay walls, linkspan bridge, finger pier, and other marine related works) fall to the two other consenting regimes and the development which is the subject of this application for planning permission in principle comprises 3 elements only: The erection of buildings and associated works for industrial, heavy engineering, fabrication and decommissioning (Class 5), and storage/distribution (Class 6) (on a level pre-prepared platform (of circa 2.1 hectares in area) being that area identified in yellow on the Plan A attached at Appendix 3. The construction of a primary means of access to form a new two-way vehicular access for the deep water port development including the forming of a junction with the Arnish Road (on an area extending to circa 0.8 ha) being that area indicated in dark green on the Plan A attached at Appendix 3. Works include a deep cutting, filling and reshaping of land, and include the provision of a culvert under the access road where it crosses the existing Allt Poll a’ Choire watercourse, as well as the removal of an existing culvert. the reuse/placement of peat (excavated from the construction footprint of the access road but also from other engineering works consented by the HRO) on an area of land identified as having potential for peat reinstatement indicated in light green on the Plan B attached at Appendix 3. The indicative peat reuse strategy contemplates reuse options including reinstatement of degraded areas of peat, reshaping of important land forms using peat; and reinstatement of road verges, bunds and other associated landscape areas. 4.4 The proposal, relating to an area in excess of 2 hectares, falls within the class of ‘Major’ development in terms of the Planning Hierarchy. 4.5 The site comprises the western shores of Glumaig Bay above the existing Mean Low Water Springs (MLWS) a rocky moorland populated by dry heath, scrubland, rockface slopes and vegetated slopes.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Outer Hebrides Local Development Plan
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE 7 MARCH 2012 OUTER HEBRIDES LOCAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Report by Director of Development PURPOSE OF REPORT: To report the outcome of consultation on the Outer Hebrides Proposed Local Development Plan and seek approval to submit the Plan to Scottish Minsters requesting Examination of the unresolved issues. COMPETENCE 1.1 There are no legal, financial, equality issues or other constraints to the recommendations being implemented. SUMMARY 2.1 Outer Hebrides Local Development Plan – Proposed Plan was published for consultation in September 2011. Forty nine individuals, agencies and companies made comment on the Proposed Plan (Appendix 1). 2.2 Responses to the submissions have been prepared. Where these constitute minor or ‘non-notifiable’ modifications these have generally been accepted (Appendix 2). Representations requesting more substantive modifications to the Plan have been grouped and addressed under twenty two topic headings. These unresolved representations are set out in the format of Schedules (Appendix 3). 2.3 The Proposed Plan will be submitted to Scottish Minister’s who will appoint a Reporter to carry out an Examination of the unresolved matters and make recommendations as to any modifications to the Plan deemed necessary. 2.4 It is recognised that in some instances the Plan might be improved if an amendment suggested through submission were to be accepted. Such instances are indicated in the schedules and the possible modifications to the plan that might result from these are set out in Appendix 4. RECOMMENDATIONS 3.1 It is recommended that the Comhairle: a) agree the responses to the comments received during consultation, detailed in Appendices 2, 3 and 4; and b) authorise the Director of Development to submit the Proposed Plan to Scottish Ministers seeking Examination of the unresolved issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Forestt26785.Pdf
    Copyright by Timothy Steven Forest 2008 The Dissertation Committee for Timothy Steven Forest Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: KITH BUT NOT KIN: THE HIGHLAND SCOTS, IMPERIAL RESETTLEMENT, AND THE NEGOTIATING OF IDENTITY ON THE FRONTIERS OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE IN THE INTERWAR YEARS Committee: Wm. Roger Louis, Supervisor Brian Levack Judith Coffin John Higley Mark Metzler KITH BUT NOT KIN: THE HIGHLAND SCOTS, IMPERIAL RESETTLEMENT, AND THE NEGOTIATING OF IDENTITY ON THE FRONTIERS OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE IN THE INTERWAR YEARS by Timothy Steven Forest, B.A.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin May 2008 KITH BUT NOT KIN: THE HIGHLAND SCOTS, IMPERIAL RESETTLEMENT, AND THE NEGOTIATING OF IDENTITY ON THE FRONTIERS OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE IN THE INTERWAR YEARS Publication No._____________ Timothy Steven Forest, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Austin, 2008 Supervisor: Wm. Roger Louis Based on archival work in England, Scotland, the United States, Canada and Australia, my dissertation expands the traditional purview of diplomatic history into the international dimensions of the social and cultural realms. My study treats doomed attempts to reconstruct previously-held notions of hierarchy and deference as encapsulated in the Empire Settlement Act (ESA) in the wake of the dramatic changes to the world order resulting from World War I. To counter the emergence of Japan as a world power, under the auspices of the ESA, British Columbia and Western Australia, the two most distant outposts of the “white” British Empire in the Pacific, imported poor Celtic farmers and militiamen from northern Scotland in an attempt to retain their iv “British” identity, which they felt was threatened by Japan on the one hand, the Japanese in their midst on another, and local “nationalisms” on a third.
    [Show full text]
  • The First World War and the 20Th Century in the History of Gaelic Scotland: a Preliminary Analysis
    Bartlett, Niall Somhairle Finlayson (2014) The First World War and the 20th century in the history of Gaelic Scotland: a preliminary analysis. MPhil(R) thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/5235/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] The First World War and the 20th Century in the History of Gaelic Scotland: a preliminary analysis Niall Somhairle Finlayson Bartlett M.A. Honours (Glasgow) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Philosophy School of Humanities College of Arts University of Glasgow September 2013 2 Abstract This thesis considers the place which the First World War and the trends in 20th century Gaelic history associated with its aftermath have in the study of the modern Highlands. The conflict's treatment in established academic works like James Hunter's The Making of the Crofting Community is discussed to highlight the way that the continued emphasis of the land issue into the 20th century, because of land hunger's 19th century prominence, has marginalised the First World War.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Recommended Great War Websites – 18 December 2020
    CEF Study Group Recommended Great War Websites - 18 D e c e m b e r 2020 - http://cefresearch.ca/phpBB3/ Dwight G Mercer /aka Borden Battery – R e g i n a , C a n a d a © Canadian Expeditionary Force Study Group – Recommended Great War Websites – December 2020 he 18 December 2020 edition of the Recommended Great War Websites by the Canadian Expeditionary Force Study Group is part of the CEF Study Group internet T discussion forum dedicated to the study, sharing of information and discussion related to the Canadian Expeditionary Force (CEF) in the Great War – in an “Open Source” mode. This List is intended to assist the reader in their research of a specific Great War theme with emphasis on the Canadian experience. Further, this recommended List of Great War websites is intended to compliment the active discourse on the Forum by its members. The function of the CEF Study Group List of Recommended Great War Websites (circa 2005) is to serve as a directory for the reader of the Great War. These websites have been vetted and grouped into logical sections. Each abstract, in general, attempts to provide a "key word" search to find websites of immediate interest. Surfing this List is one of the objectives. All aspects of the Canadian Expeditionary Force are open to examination. Emphasis is on coordinated study, information exchange, civil and constructive critiquing of postings and general mutual support in the research and study of the CEF. Wherever possible, we ask that members provide a reference source for any information posted.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation Responses for Advice on the Aspects of the Land Based Works in Which We Have an Interest
    Comhairle nan Eilean Siar COMHAIRLE NAN EILEAN SIAR MARINE (SCOTLAND) ACT 2010, PART 4 MARINE LICENSING 06825/06826 – Stornoway Port Authority (per EnviroCentre) - Construction and Dredging and Sea Disposal, Goat Island, Newton Marina, Stornoway ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Response of Comhairle nan Eilean Siar, Dated 4 February 2019 Application Reference 18/00431/MLCON Registration Date 21st December 2018 Application Address Newton Marina Goat Island Stornoway Isle Of Lewis Proposal Proposed development of 75 pontoon berth Marina at Newton Basin, Goat Island, Stornoway, construction of breakwater, dredging of channel, reclamation of land to north side of Goat Island to be used for parking and boat storage and potential future uses to include a marina facilities building and a boat workshop to provide covered space for boat building and maintenance. Construction of a new public slipway, installation of boat lift including a horizontal rail system supported on steel piles. Provision of a new passing place at the northern end of the Goat island causeway through reclaiming an area of land. RESPONSE TO MARINE LICENCE CONSULTATION Cultural Heritage and Archaeology Cultural Heritage and Archaeology are covered in Chapter 6 of the Environmental Impact Assessment Report. Following on from recommendations made at the consultation and scoping phase of this project, this document sets out the assessment methodology and results of investigations in both the terrestrial and marine zones. The effects of the proposed development have been examined against an assessment of importance of the historic environment assets identified, through desk based and walkover survey data both within and out with the development area. This included identifying potential impacts, suggesting suitable mitigation strategies to offset any adverse effects and identification of residual effects from the development.
    [Show full text]
  • Comhairle Nan Eilean Siar Public Performance Report 2017-18
    Comhairle nan Eilean Siar Public Performance Report 2017-18 a confident council, effective partnerships and confident communities Comhairle mhisneachail, com-pàirtichean èifeachdach agus coimhearsnachdan misneachail Population Sluagh Economy Eaconamaidh Education and Training Foghlam agus Trèanadh Health & Wellbeing Slàinte agus Soirbheas Communities Coimhearsnachdan Natural and Cultural Resources Stòras Nàdarra agus Cultarail Services Seirbheisean Introduction Welcome to Comhairle nan Eilean Siar’s public performance report for 2019 which covers the The Comhairle has committed to empower and support communities in shaping their own futures 2017/18 period. and to be involved in decisions affecting them, and looks forward to enhancing this support This is one of the means we use to keep our communities informed and to invite comments on further following conclusion of Scottish Government’s Review of Local Governance in 2019. An service delivery and other issues. example of this is the ‘Community Conversations’ taking place across the Islands in late 2018 as part Further information can be provided on request or can be accessed at: www.cne-siar.gov.uk of the budgetary process and service redesign. The Comhairle adopted its Corporate Strategy in December 2017 and it sets out the Comhairle’s Against an increasingly harsh economic background, The Comhairle, working together with our strategic priorities for the period 2017-21. This is in parallel with the Outer Hebrides Community Community Planning Partners, continues to aim to provide the highest possible standard of servic- Planning Partnership’s Local Outcomes Improvement Plan (LOIP). The common themes of both es whilst providing leadership and external advocacy for the communities of the Outer Hebrides.
    [Show full text]
  • EVENTS SECTION ONE 155.Indd
    22 Francis Street Stornoway •#%& ' Insurance Services R & G RMk Isle of Lewis Jewellery HS1 2NB •#'&( ) Risk Management !" t: 01851 704949 •#* +# ,( Health & Safety ADVICE www.rmkgroup.co.uk YOU CAN ( )) TRUST ISTANBUL KEBABS FISH ‘n’ CHIPS BURGERS CURRIES PIZZAS RESTAURANT & TAKEAWAY * +(,-../0/1 & ' )'&23 )# !%5FAMILY FRIENDLY RESTAURANT WITH OVER )!%530 YEARS SERVING THE ISLAND H SOMETHING FOR EVERYONE OPEN 7 DAYS Tues-Thursday 12pm-2.30pm 4.30-10.30pm Friday-Saturday: 12pm-3pm 4pm till late The local one Sunday: 12pm till late (open all day Sunday) stop solution for all 24 South Beach Street, Stornoway, Isle of Lewis your printing and Tel: 01851 700299 design needs. 01851 700924 New Year babies! !7ryyShq [email protected] &"%#% www.sign-print.co.uk See page 14 @signprintsty Church House, James St. Stornoway BANGLA SPICE !%&'"()* \ !$$$$ !"#$ ! !$$$ % % !"#$% ! &#$% '() ! () *+#$% , $#$% -.() ! -.() / ! 5 - - - ** ' * /*/ /0, - 1 -+2 * 4 * + , - + .-- !"# !"# %& G \ S Ury) '$ &$( (Ah) '$ &#&#" ! ! !"#$"%& %'$ EVENTS SECTION ONE - Page 2 www.hebevents.com 10/01/19 - 06/02/19 Love's labours lost as cow fl ees to loch shy Highland cow needed all the emergency resources of provide safety advice and support. Once fi re crews had been stood A Fire Scotland and Coastguard Rescue Teams on Thursday down, the volunteer Coastguard teams were dismayed to see the January 3rd when she chose to get stuck in a loch rather than determined bull quickly chasing his intended back into the water. take up with a bull. She once again refused to emerge from the safety of the loch in the The cow was reported stuck in a loch near Quidinish in the Bays face of further advances from the bull.
    [Show full text]
  • Stornoway Wind Farm Ltd Stornoway Wind Farm
    Stornoway Wind Farm Ltd Stornoway Wind Farm Planning Statement Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions UK Limited – April 2019 3 © Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions UK Limited Executive summary Purpose of this report This Planning Statement supports an application under section 36 of the Electricity Act 1989 for a wind farm for up to 35 turbines and associated development (the Proposed Development) on land near Stornoway on the Isle of Lewis (the Development Site). It refers to and draws on the findings of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report prepared for the application. Chapter 4 of the EIA Report provides further information on the location of the Proposed Development and its description. It is material to the application for the Proposed Development that consent has previously been granted for a 36 turbine wind farm and associated development (the 'Consented Development') on the 'Development Site'. The Proposed Development would allow the installation of approximately 196 MW. The Consented Development has an installed capacity of 180MW, therefore the Proposed Development would increase the contribution towards Scotland’s target of 100 per cent of electricity production from renewable resources by 2020. This Planning Statement provides a justification for the Proposed Development; undertakes an assessment against relevant energy and planning policies, material considerations and provides a conclusion that demonstrates the need for the Proposed Development; that the Proposed Development is sustainable and supported by national policy and; that it broadly complies with the relevant Local Development Plan and other material considerations, and as a result consent should be granted. April 2019 Doc Ref. 40001CGOS045 4 © Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions UK Limited April 2019 Doc Ref.
    [Show full text]
  • 01 AI Chapters
    3-1 © Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions UK Limited 3. Scheme Need, Alternatives and Iterative Design Process 3.1 Need for the Project 3.1.1 As set out in the revised Planning Statement 2020 and EIA Chapter 5, Scottish planning and energy policy provides strong support for wind development in principle and encourages local authorities to guide developments towards appropriate locations. 3.1.2 The Onshore Wind Policy Statement (December 2017) confirms the continuing importance of onshore wind, for meeting climate change targets; confirming that onshore wind is a vital component of the economic opportunity that renewables more generally create for Scotland. The Policy Statement identifies that the important role for onshore wind means that development in the right places must be supported, and – increasingly – the extension and replacement of existing sites, where acceptable, with new and larger turbines, based on an appropriate, case by case assessment of their effects and impacts. 3.1.3 The Scottish Energy Strategy (December 2017) and the Onshore Wind Policy Statement both recognise the role of onshore wind as a key contributor to the delivery of renewable energy targets – specifically the new 2030 50% energy from renewable sources target. 3.1.4 The Proposed Development would represent a significant contribution, not just in terms of renewable energy output, but in the savings associated with C02 output (see AI Appendix 9H: Peat Management Plan for calculations and information) and the revised Planning Statement 2020. The increase in renewable energy output as a result of the Proposed Development would ensure further progress towards meeting the national and international targets in limiting the amount of greenhouse gas emissions outlined in EIA Chapter 5.
    [Show full text]
  • CEF Study Group Recommended Great War Websites
    CEF Study Group Recommended Great War Websites - 11 November 2012 - Canadian Expeditionary Force Study Group – Recommended Great War Websites – November 2012 he Canadian Expeditionary Force Study Group (CEF Study Group) is an internet discussion forum dedicated to the study, exchange of information and discussion related to the Canadian T Expeditionary Force (CEF) in the Great War. The CEF Study Group forum was formed in 2004 by Neil Burns, Forum Administrator and was generally based around some of the original "Canadian Pals" from the Great War Discussion forum. In general, you will not find many websites which glorify war and conflict - the common theme is generally to accurately document this event and to provide for the remembrance of those who participated in this historic world conflict. All aspects of the Canadian Expeditionary Force is open to examination. The moderators, in alphabetical order are: Peter Broznitsky, Richard Laughton & Dwight Mercer (aka Borden Battery). Emphasis is on coordinated study, information exchange, constructive critiquing of postings and general mutual support in the research and study of the CEF. Membership is free (but donations gratefully accepted) and backgrounds range from first-time readers of history to doctoral researchers and published authors. The CEF Study Group discussion forum also has a number of members who volunteer as "Mentors" to assist new members on the discussion forum and as they start their own personal research. The objective of the CEF Study Group List of Recommended Great War Websites is to serve as a directory for the researcher. These websites have been researched and grouped into logical sections.
    [Show full text]
  • Stornoway Wind Farm Limited Stornoway Wind Farm
    Stornoway Wind Farm Limited Stornoway Wind Farm Scoping Report Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions UK Limited – July 2018 3 © Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions UK Limited Executive summary Purpose of this report This scoping report has been prepared by Wood on behalf of Stornoway Wind Farm Limited (SWL). SWL is a subsidiary of Lewis Wind Power, which is a joint venture between EDF Energy Renewables (EDF ER) Holdings Ltd and Amec Project Investments Ltd in partnership with the Stornoway Trust. This report sets out the proposed scope of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), the findings of which will be presented in an Environmental Impact Assessment Report (EIA Report). This purpose of this report is to serve as a formal request to the Scottish Ministers to provide a scoping opinion under Regulation 12 of the Electricity Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Scotland) Regulations 2017. The EIA, which this scoping request will inform, relates to a forthcoming application under section 36 of the Electricity Act 1989 (as amended) to construct and operate a wind farm on the site of the Consented Stornoway Wind Farm. Summary Findings of the Scoping Report The Proposed Development has the benefit of being able to draw on previous surveys (carried out between 2010 – 2014) and assessment work relating to the Consented Stornoway Wind Farm. Therefore, this scoping report draws on these quantitative results to identify where significant effects are likely in terms of each of the relevant environmental topics. The following environmental topic areas are proposed to be scoped into the EIA Report: Landscape and Visual; Historic Environment; Ornithology; Ecology; Fisheries; Geology, Hydrogeology and Hydrology; Traffic and Access; Noise; Socio-economics, Tourism and Recreation; Shadow Flicker; and Human Health; and Major Accidents and Disasters.
    [Show full text]
  • Number 77 May 2018 War Memorials Trust Works to Protect and Conserve All War Memorials Within the UK
    Bulletin Number 77 May 2018 War Memorials Trust works to protect and conserve all war memorials within the UK Objectives of War Memorials Trust 1. To monitor the condition of war memorials and to encourage protection and conservation when appropriate. Bulletin 2. To provide expert advice to those involved in war memorial ISSN: 1745-7556; Published quarterly by projects, to act as the specialist organisation for war memorial War Memorials Trust conservation issues and to facilitate repair and conservation 14 Buckingham Palace Road through grant schemes. London SW1W 0QP Telephone administration: 020 7834 0200 3. To work with relevant organisations to encourage them to Telephone conservation: 020 7233 7356 accept responsibility for war memorials and recognise the Telephone charity: 0300 123 0764 need to undertake repair and conservation work. Email: [email protected] or [email protected] 4. To build a greater understanding of war memorial heritage Web: www.warmemorials.org www.learnaboutwarmemorials.org and raise awareness of the issues surrounding war memorial www.warmemorialsonline.org.uk conservation. Registered Charity Commission No. 1062255 Membership rates Patron HRH The Duchess of Cornwall War Memorials Trust membership rates (membership rates valid until end of December 2018): Vice Patrons Diana Graves (England), Sara Jones CBE (England), Thomas Lloyd OBE, DL, FSA Annual membership: £20 individual or £30 joint (Wales), Rear Admiral Roger Lockwood Life membership: £150 individual or £200 joint (Scotland), The Lord Rogan of Lower Iveagh (N. I.) and Simon Weston OBE (Wales) Grant schemes President Rt. Hon. Lord Cope of Berkeley War Memorials Trust administers a number of grant schemes Trustees for the repair and conservation of war memorials in the UK.
    [Show full text]