Northern DMG Deer Management Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Northern DMG Deer Management Plan DEER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE NORTHERN DEER MANAGEMENT GROUP AREA 2016-2020 NOV 2018 UPDATE Prepared on behalf of the NORTHERN DEER MANAGEMENT GROUP by Professor R.J.Putman Woodend, Banavie, by Fort William, Inverness-shire PH33 7PB phone: 01397 772774; email: [email protected] 2 NORTHERN DEER MANAGEMENT GROUP: GROUP DEER PLAN 2016 – 2020 CONTENTS: Page A. Introduction: 5 The Northern Deer Management Area: 7 Geology, Vegetation, Mammals and Birds, Invertebrates Communities and Species of Special Interest Designations 8 Group Membership 9 Deer Populations 10 An overview of the main issues affecting the Management Area 11 Condition of designated sites 12 Woodlands and Commercial Forestry 19 Sustainability of Deer Populations 19 Deer-Vehicle Collisions, Non-native species 20 The Structure of this Document 20 B. Vegetation, Deer Populations and Current Management of Individual Estates: 1. Skelpick and Rhifail 22 2. Armadale Farm 26 3. Armadale Estate 28 4. Strathy North and Strathy South 29 5. Syre [Rosal] 32 6. Badanloch [North] 33 7. Achentoul 36 8. Land owned by RSPB at Forsinard/Forsinain/Knockfin 41 9. Number One Holding 45 10. Bighouse Estate 46 11. Sandside 49 12. Shurrery Estate 53 13. Dorrery Farm and Estate 57 14. Langwell and Braemore [Welbeck Estates] 59 15. Navidale Farm 68 16. Suisgill Estate 68 17. Torrish [North] 72 18. Caen 74 19. Dunbeath 74 20. Glutt 81 21. Latheronwheel 85 22. Rumsdale and Dalnawillan [Ulbster Estates] 87 23. Braehour and Backlass [Ulbster Estates] 89 24. Strathmore [Ulbster Estates] and Blar nam Faoileag 91 25. Achkeepster 94 26. Land owned and managed by Forest Enterprise Scotland 96 27. Rimsdale, Navidale Forest, Lochdhu Woodlands, Braehour forest blocks 97 28. Land managed on behalf of private owners by Fountain Forestry 97 3 C. General Considerations Summary of main actions proposed 99 General stocking rates and ongoing monitoring 100 Monitoring of deer populations 103 Monitoring of habitat condition/habitat management 104 Other issues: Roe deer; Non-native species; Best Practice 105 Training; Welfare; Economic Costs and benefits; Communication 106 Education and Wider Engagement; Public Access, Public Safety 107 D. Public Interest Actions 109 Summary of Public Interest Benefits and Action Points 110 Example Annual Audit Sheet 114 Appendices 1. Constitution of the Northern Deer Management Group 2. Individual Estates: Current Deer Management Figures and Future Management Recommendations [Confidential] Maps Maps are appended to this Plan as listed below. 1a. Northern DMG Deer Management Area and Property boundaries - West 1b. Northern DMG Deer Management Area and Property boundaries - East 2. Overall Vegetation Cover of the Management Area as denoted by Land Cover Scotland 3. Reported Area of Woodland Cover (and potential woodland cover) mapped by the National Forest Inventory 4. Areas of Recent Woodland Creation 5. Designated sites within the NDMG Area 6. Reported Condition of Designated Sites 7. Condition of Native Woodlands reported by the Native Woodlands Survey of Scotland 2014 8. Deer Vehicle Collisions reported in the Management Area between 2013 and 2017 4 The structure of this document: Given the size of the NDMG Management Area and the number of separate properties involved, this Plan is inevitably rather long. However, the main management actions to be taken over the next five years for the Group are presented in Section C towards the end of the document. This final part of the document thus forms the actual Management Plan. However, since management decisions must be taken (and reviewed) in the context of a proper understanding of the deer populations of the area, their movements, impacts upon their habitat, and in the light of any specific problems perceived in the future management of this resource, the Plan begins [Sections A and B] with some initial description of the ‘resource’: a description of habitats and deer populations on individual estates as well as a brief account of past management practices. Information on deer counts and culls for individual estates, along with future management recommendations for each estate, is contained in the confidential Appendix 2, for the use of group members only. November 2018 Update This Plan is currently being restructured, with sensitive estate information having been moved to a separate confidential section (Appendix 2). Aggregated figures for counts, culls and population models will shortly be added to the Plan, arranged by sub-group. A Working Plan is being written and should be available by Spring 2019. A INTRODUCTION: A1.1 The area of the Northern Deer Management Group (NDMG) includes in effect all that land north and east of a line defined by Strathnaver (and the B873) and the B871 between Syre and Kinbrace, and all land to east of the A897 through the Strath of Kildonan to Helmsdale. To the south east it is bounded by the coastline between Helmsdale and Latheron and to the east is bounded by the road from Isauld towards Halkirk along the side of Loch Calder and thereafter the B870 to Mybster and the A9 between Mybster and Latheron; much of the land to the east of Sandside Estate and to the north of Shurrery, however, is commercial forestry which is securely fenced and the open range management area covered by the NDMG is thus in effect bounded to the north and east by these two latter Estates (Maps 1a & 1b). A1.2 The total area within the NDMG Management Area (excluding towns and villages) is assessed by Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) as 150,678 ha. The area includes land in some 20 main ownerships as well as a similar number of smaller ownerships. Deer Management and associated activities of major landholdings are coordinated through discussion within the NDMG, which meets formally twice a year (although other meetings may be called as required and much business is transacted via email). The majority of member estates attempt to have a representative present at all meetings (and in future, all will be expected to have a representative present); meetings are also attended by representatives from the Forestry Commission, SNH regional and wildlife staff and local community interest groups by invitation. The Group’s constitution is appended to this Plan. A1.3 In response to significant changes in patterns of land use in the area, with increasing concerns from SNH and others about recorded impacts on designated sites and with concerns within the group about changing numbers and distributions of deer within the area and about longer term sustainability of sporting harvests overall, the Deer Management Plan adopted by NDMG in 2001 in 2002 was updated in 2013 in an attempt to accommodate and respond to these changing pressures. At that time however, only certain estates/land owners were included in the exercise, as Achentoul, Bighouse, Dunbeath, Glutt, No1 Forsinard, Langwell and Braemore, Navidale Farm, Shurrery, Skelpick & Rhifail, Suisgill, Syre, Torrish and the various properties owned and managed by the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB). A1.4 Following a more recent assessment of the group’s management activities, in collaboration with SNH (RAG assessment) the NDMG determined to update and revise this former partial Plan, extending coverage to include all member Estates, and at the same time bring it into line with the new ADMG Benchmark for Deer Plans. NDMG accepts the Government’s Code of Practice on Deer Management and the ADMG’s Principles of Collaboration in relation to Deer Management. A1.5 In development of the actual Management Plan which follows, the Group employed Professor R.J. Putman to collate relevant information on deer populations and habitat condition, to assist in establishing clear definition of objectives for individual estates or for the Group as a whole, as well as help focus discussion on future possible management options within individual estates or the wider Management Group Area. Information was sought from all estates and the Chairman and Secretary of the Management Group on deer counts for the different estates or other land-holdings over the past 10 years, recorded calf-hind ratios and cull data. A1.6 Detailed consultations were undertaken with individual landowners, or their managing agents, as well as all stalkers to establish i) current deer numbers and distribution on their own estates; movement patterns within estates and between adjacent properties; past and present management policy and procedures; ii) current patterns of land use, plans and expectations for the future, as well as exploring aims and objectives of management for their deer for the future. 6 A1.7 Additional consultation was carried out with other interest groups such as SNH Regional staff and Forestry Commission for Scotland as well as local community groups to establish their interests and aspirations for future management of the area. Finally, independent assessments were also undertaken of the condition of the deer herds and the condition of the habitat during a series of visits to all the estates by RP at intervals between January 2012 and December 2016. A1.8 After extensive consultation this Plan is presented as an agreed Deer Management Plan for a five- year period from 2016-2020. The Plan has been prepared to integrate individual Estate Management Plans, and Long-Term Forest Plans with Group-level commitments and to ensure delivery of both private and public interest. A1.9 In any Management Area it is impossible to find a period of absolute stasis with all future factors influencing management decisions fully resolved. Indeed, in the period of the previous Plan there have been a number of changes of land-ownership and/or objective. This Plan therefore is inevitably prepared against a background context with some remaining ‘unknowns’ and should not be seen as set in stone. Rather the Plan is seen as indicative and must allow room for flexibility as circumstances may change.
Recommended publications
  • Caithness County Council
    Caithness County Council RECORDS’ IDENTITY STATEMENT Reference number: CC Alternative reference number: Title: Caithness County Council Dates of creation: 1720-1975 Level of description: Fonds Extent: 10 bays of shelving Format: Mainly paper RECORDS’ CONTEXT Name of creators: Caithness County Council Administrative history: 1889-1930 County Councils were established under the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1889. They assumed the powers of the Commissioners of Supply, and of Parochial Boards, excluding those in Burghs, under the Public Health Acts. The County Councils also assumed the powers of the County Road Trusts, and as a consequence were obliged to appoint County Road Boards. Powers of the former Police Committees of the Commissioners were transferred to Standing Joint Committees, composed of County Councillors, Commissioners and the Sheriff of the county. They acted as the police committee of the counties - the executive bodies for the administration of police. The Act thus entrusted to the new County Councils most existing local government functions outwith the burghs except the poor law, education, mental health and licensing. Each county was divided into districts administered by a District Committee of County Councillors. Funded directly by the County Councils, the District Committees were responsible for roads, housing, water supply and public health. Nucleus: The Nuclear and Caithness Archive 1 Provision was also made for the creation of Special Districts to be responsible for the provision of services including water supply, drainage, lighting and scavenging. 1930-1975 The Local Government Act (Scotland) 1929 abolished the District Committees and Parish Councils and transferred their powers and duties to the County Councils and District Councils (see CC/6).
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Duty Report
    Agenda Item 16 Report No ECI/37/20 HIGHLAND COUNCIL Committee: Economy and Infrastructure Date: 4 November 2020 Report Title: Biodiversity Duty Report Report By: Executive Chief Officer, Infrastructure and Environment 1 Purpose/Executive Summary 1.1 This report presents the draft Biodiversity Duty Report 2018-2020. This report has been produced in response to the statutory requirement that all public bodies must provide a publicly available report every three years that sets out the actions they have taken to meet their biodiversity duty. 2 Recommendations 2.1 Members are asked to: i. approve the Biodiversity Duty Report 2018-2020 (Appendix 1) for publication on the Council’s website by the end of December 2020; and ii. note the content and breadth of work related to biodiversity undertaken across the organisation, accepting that the report still needs to incorporate the work of the High Life Highland Rangers (following return from furlough) and may be subject to a number of presentational and typographical changes prior to publication. 3 Implications 3.1 Resource: None. This report outlines the actions taken over the last 3 years to meet the Council’s biodiversity duty. Future resource requirements will be carefully assessed, given the Council’s financial position, and the Council will work with external partners to identify opportunities. 3.2 Legal: This report is produced in accordance with the requirements set out in The Wildlife and Natural Environment (Scotland) Act 2011. Publication of the Biodiversity Duty Report towards the end of December 2020 fulfils this statutory duty. 3.3 Community (Equality, Poverty and Rural): There are no Community (Equality, Poverty and Rural) implications arising directly from this report.
    [Show full text]
  • UK13003 Page 1 of 10 Caithness and Sutherland Peatlands
    Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7 (1990), as amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the 8th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2002) and Resolutions IX.1 Annex B, IX.6, IX.21 and IX. 22 of the 9th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2005). Notes for compilers: 1. The RIS should be completed in accordance with the attached Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for completing the Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands. Compilers are strongly advised to read this guidance before filling in the RIS. 2. Further information and guidance in support of Ramsar site designations are provided in the Strategic Framework for the future development of the List of Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Wise Use Handbook 7, 2nd edition, as amended by COP9 Resolution IX.1 Annex B). A 3rd edition of the Handbook, incorporating these amendments, is in preparation and will be available in 2006. 3. Once completed, the RIS (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Ramsar Secretariat. Compilers should provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the RIS and, where possible, digital copies of all maps. 1. Name and address of the compiler of this form: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY. DD MM YY Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House City Road Designation date Site Reference Number Peterborough Cambridgeshire PE1 1JY UK Telephone/Fax: +44 (0)1733 – 562 626 / +44 (0)1733 – 555 948 Email: [email protected] 2. Date this sheet was completed/updated: Designated: 02 February 1999 3. Country: UK (Scotland) 4. Name of the Ramsar site: Caithness and Sutherland Peatlands 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Sutherland Futures-P22-24
    THINGS YOU NEED TO NOTE ALTNAHARRA, OUTLYING TOWNSHIPS INCHNADAMPH, FORSINARD Reinforcing rural townships where development is consistent with the pattern of AND KINBRACE settlement, service capacity and local amenity is encouraged. Central South and East North West Achnahannat Achuan Achlyness Several traditional staging posts within the remote and sparsely populated Achnairn Achavandra Muir Achmelvich interior continue to offer lifeline services in remote, fragile communities. Altass Achrimsdale-East Achnacarin Prospects are dependent on sustained employment in estate/land management, Amat Clyne Achriesgill (east and tourism and interpretive facilities and local enterprise. Development pressures Astle Achue west) are negligible. Given a lack of first-time infrastructure, a flexible development Linside Ardachu Badcall regime needs to balance safeguards for the existing character and environmental Linsidemore Backies Badnaban standards. Migdale Badnellan Balchladich Spinningdale Badninish Blairmore Camore Clachtoll Clashbuidh Clashmore What key sites are most suitable? What key sites North are least suitable? Does the Settlement Clashmore Clashnessie Achininver Crakaig Crofts- Culkein Development Area suitably reflect the limits of Baligill Lothmore Culkein of Drumbeg ?? your community for future development? Blandy/Strathtongue ??? Crofthaugh Droman Braetongue/ Brae Culgower-West Garty Elphin What development or facilities does your Kirkiboll Lodge Foindle Clerkhill community need and where? Culrain Inshegra Coldbackie Dalchalm Inverkirkaig
    [Show full text]
  • Caithness and Sutherland Proposed Local Development Plan Committee Version November, 2015
    Caithness and Sutherland Proposed Local Development Plan Committee Version November, 2015 Proposed CaSPlan The Highland Council Foreword Foreword Foreword to be added after PDI committee meeting The Highland Council Proposed CaSPlan About this Proposed Plan About this Proposed Plan The Caithness and Sutherland Local Development Plan (CaSPlan) is the second of three new area local development plans that, along with the Highland-wide Local Development Plan (HwLDP) and Supplementary Guidance, will form the Highland Council’s Development Plan that guides future development in Highland. The Plan covers the area shown on the Strategy Map on page 3). CaSPlan focuses on where development should and should not occur in the Caithness and Sutherland area over the next 10-20 years. Along the north coast the Pilot Marine Spatial Plan for the Pentland Firth and Orkney Waters will also influence what happens in the area. This Proposed Plan is the third stage in the plan preparation process. It has been approved by the Council as its settled view on where and how growth should be delivered in Caithness and Sutherland. However, it is a consultation document which means you can tell us what you think about it. It will be of particular interest to people who live, work or invest in the Caithness and Sutherland area. In preparing this Proposed Plan, the Highland Council have held various consultations. These included the development of a North Highland Onshore Vision to support growth of the marine renewables sector, Charrettes in Wick and Thurso to prepare whole-town visions and a Call for Sites and Ideas, all followed by a Main Issues Report and Additional Sites and Issues consultation.
    [Show full text]
  • Role Title: People Engagement Volunteer Where: Forsinard but With
    Role Title: People Engagement Volunteer Where: Forsinard but with travel across Caithness and Sutherland When: Mid October – Late February Commitment: 5 days a week for 4 months. Why We Want You: We are looking for a new member of our team to help us engage with a wide range of people and raise awareness of the global importance of the peatlands of Caithness and Sutherland known as The Flow Country. As part of the Flows to the Future Team you will work closely with our project partners: Scottish Natural Heritage, the Highland Council and Environmental Research Institute (North Highland College UHI) to create exciting and innovative ways to tell people about our work. You will work primarily with our Learning Development and Communities Officers to build upon our existing work and increase our reach across this large area and beyond. This includes supporting the development and delivery of learning sessions for primary and secondary schools, organising and supporting a programme of community events across the Flow Country, contributing to our marketing and communications work and exploring the opportunities to promote our new film, 3D landscape model and computer game to a wider audience. The Flow Country is the best blanket bog of its type in the world and a key resource in the fight against climate change. The Flows to the Future Project is far reaching, ambitious and aims to significantly increase the level of conservation management and promotional activities currently being undertaken. More information about the project can be found at: www.theflowcountry.org.uk Training will be given in environmental education and engagement methods, event management, social media and digital skills, species identification and habitat management.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Analysis of Strathy North Wind Farm
    Economic Analysis of Strathy North Wind Farm A report to SSE Renewables January 2020 Contents 1. Executive Summary 1 2. Introduction 3 3. Economic Impact of Strathy North Wind Farm 6 4. Community Benefit 18 5. Appendix A – Consultations 23 6. Appendix B – Economic Impact Methodology 24 Economic Analysis of Strathy North Wind Farm 1. Executive Summary The development, construction and operation of Strathy North Wind Farm has generated substantial local and national impacts and will continue to do so throughout its operational lifetime and beyond. Strathy North Wind Farm, which is based in the north of Scotland, near Strathy in North Sutherland, was developed and built at a cost of £113 million (DEVEX/CAPEX). Operational expenditure (OPEX) and decommissioning costs over its 25-year lifetime are expected to be £121 million. The expected total expenditure (TOTEX) is £234 million. During the development and construction of Strathy North Wind Farm, it was estimated that companies and organisations in Scotland secured contracts worth £59.4 million. The area is expected to secure £100.6 million in OPEX contracts over the wind farm’s operational lifetime (£4.0 million annually). Overall the expenditure, including decommissioning, secured in Scotland is expected to be £165.0 million, or 73% of TOTEX. Highland is expected to secure £21.9 million in DEVEX/CAPEX contracts and £51.5 million in OPEX contracts (£2.1 million annually). Overall, Highland is expected to secure contracts worth £77.0 million, or 33% of TOTEX. Of this, £25.6 million, equivalent to 11% of TOTEX is expected to be secure in Caithness and North Sutherland.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinbrace Drove Stance Summary
    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON MHG10266 Name: Kinbrace Drove Stance Summary: A two-compartment enclosure probably constructed as a drove stance. Grid Reference: NC866286 Civil Parish: Kildonan Geographical Area: Sutherland Date of Survey: 26 January 2012 Monument Type: Stock enclosure Full Description: The stance is situated on a grassy haugh on the east bank of the River Helmsdale and consists of a rectangular enclosure with two compartments. The earthen dykes are up to one metre in height but are poorly preserved and discontinuous in places. In the south dyke there is a probable entrance near the south east corner and a second gap further to the west. A mound ten metres north of the enclosure is suggestive of a small building but might be a natural feature. It is likely that two drove roads from the north converged at or near to this location – the Ca na Catanach (MHG 835) from Caithness and the route from Syre in Strathnaver – while the drove road south from this point enters the hill ground near Borrobol and continues to Invershin. The stance lies 3.5 km south of the site of the former drovers’ inn at Achentoul. It is possible that the stance passed out of use when this inn (which is likely to have had its own stance) came into operation, or it may have been used as an alternative site for assembling droves and holding them overnight. The monument is currently recorded as a Stock Enclosure but its configuration and location indicates that it was probably a drove stance. Other References: Rev Donald Sage, in ‘Parish Life in the North of Scotland’, wrote: About three miles below, the river receives a considerable addition to its volume by the water of Strathbeag which, rising about eight miles to the N.E., there joins the Helmisdale.
    [Show full text]
  • Donations to and Purchases for the Museum
    DONATIONS TO AND PURCHASES FOR THE MUSEUM Donations (1) Microlithic flint and chert artifacts etc., from near Kalemouth Bridge, Roxburgh- shir 710275)T e(N othed ,an r site Roxburghshiren si JOHy B . N FORSYTH, F.S.A.SCOT. (2) Stone axehead, foun t Blackforda d Hill Quarry, Edinburgh MARTIy B . N DOCHERTY, Edinburgh. (3) Stone axehead, foun t Hanoverda , Auldearn, Nairnshire poachind an ; g tackley B . the EARL OF CAWDOR, F.S.A.SCOT. (4) Stone axehead from bing at West Calder, and probably from The Bads Colliery, Harburn, West Calder. By H. McK-ERL, West Calder. (5) Stone axehead, foun t Greenshielda d s Farm, Newbigging, Lanarkshire. I . W y B . HEARD, Newbigging. (6) Three Beakers and a flint arrowhead from Rounie Law, Forglen, BanfFshire (P.S.A.S. , XL (1905-6), 279-90) beakea d an , r from Burnsid Whitefieldf eo , Banftshire (ibid., 306-10). By the late Lt.-Col. Sir GEORGE W. ABERCROMBY, Bart., Turriff. (7) Four barbed-and-tanged arrowheads, from Glen Dye, Kincardineshire; one hollow- based arrowhead, no locality; various recent brooches. By Miss E. J. BEGG, F.S.A.SCOT. (8) Perforated pebble macehead from Hatton, Lhanbryde, Moray; fragment of a cinerary urnmedium-sizeo tw , d ston flino etw t axe arrowheadsd san tangee on , d barbed an othee dth r lozenge-shaped l probablAl . y fro fare m Ardkeilingth f m o , Morayshir vicinitys it r eo . Reliquary,(Cfe Th . 1897, 41-47) Misy B .. sPETRIEJ , South Croydon, Surrey. (9) Unusually large stone battle-axe . lon weighind in g9 ,an Ibg3 .. (fig12oz .
    [Show full text]
  • Iron Age Scotland: Scarf Panel Report
    Iron Age Scotland: ScARF Panel Report Images ©as noted in the text ScARF Summary Iron Age Panel Document September 2012 Iron Age Scotland: ScARF Panel Report Summary Iron Age Panel Report Fraser Hunter & Martin Carruthers (editors) With panel member contributions from Derek Alexander, Dave Cowley, Julia Cussans, Mairi Davies, Andrew Dunwell, Martin Goldberg, Strat Halliday, and Tessa Poller For contributions, images, feedback, critical comment and participation at workshops: Ian Armit, Julie Bond, David Breeze, Lindsey Büster, Ewan Campbell, Graeme Cavers, Anne Clarke, David Clarke, Murray Cook, Gemma Cruickshanks, John Cruse, Steve Dockrill, Jane Downes, Noel Fojut, Simon Gilmour, Dawn Gooney, Mark Hall, Dennis Harding, John Lawson, Stephanie Leith, Euan MacKie, Rod McCullagh, Dawn McLaren, Ann MacSween, Roger Mercer, Paul Murtagh, Brendan O’Connor, Rachel Pope, Rachel Reader, Tanja Romankiewicz, Daniel Sahlen, Niall Sharples, Gary Stratton, Richard Tipping, and Val Turner ii Iron Age Scotland: ScARF Panel Report Executive Summary Why research Iron Age Scotland? The Scottish Iron Age provides rich data of international quality to link into broader, European-wide research questions, such as that from wetlands and the well-preserved and deeply-stratified settlement sites of the Atlantic zone, from crannog sites and from burnt-down buildings. The nature of domestic architecture, the movement of people and resources, the spread of ideas and the impact of Rome are examples of topics that can be explored using Scottish evidence. The period is therefore important for understanding later prehistoric society, both in Scotland and across Europe. There is a long tradition of research on which to build, stretching back to antiquarian work, which represents a considerable archival resource.
    [Show full text]
  • An Interim Report on the Results of the Lairg Project 1988 - 1992 R.P.J
    AN INTERIM REPORT ON THE RESULTS OF THE LAIRG PROJECT 1988 - 1992 R.P.J. McCullagh Abstract This paper reviews the archaeological fieldwork undertaken at Lairg, Sutherland from 1988 to 1991 and reports on the preliminary results ofpost-excavation analyses. This programme was established at the instigation of regional and national heritage agencies to advise on a route for a proposed upgraded road. Standard and innovatory techniques of archaeological excavation and survey were combined with various environmental approaches in an attempt to map the evolution of the present-day landscape. In particular, the project has sought to identify and analyse the crucial role of land-use in this evolution. Introduction The recent archaeological work at Lairg, in eastern Sutherland, took place within a corridor of land that straddles the A836. This corridor measures 2.2 miles (3.5km) by a maximum of 330yds (O.3km) and runs north from Achinduich farm to about 0.6 miles (lkm) south of the village of Lairg (Fig. 1). The then Highland Regional Roads Authority (HRRA) informed Historic Scotland and sought assistance in achieving a route that would cause the least damage to the archaeological remains in the corridor. The archaeological project that developed from this enquiry has been funded by Highland Regional Council and Historic Scotland. The fieldwork spanned four years: 1988 a topographic survey of upstanding monuments; 1989 a test-pit sampling programme; 1990 a short season of scientific sampling; 1990 an eight week season of excavations; 1991 a further eight week season of excavations. Further fieldwork directed towards the sampling needs of two associated research studentships (see below) has also been undertaken.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 P924: JHM Williamson Railway Collection RECORDS' IDENTITY
    P924: J.H.M. Williamson Railway Collection RECORDS’ IDENTITY STATEMENT Reference number: GB1741/P924 Alternative reference number: Title: J.H.M. Williamson Railway Collection Dates of creation: 1845 - 2022 Level of description: Fonds Extent: 10 boxes Format: Paper, photograph, plastic, USB RECORDS’ CONTEXT Name of creators: Vivienne Williamson Administrative history: Research by J.H.M. Williamson on the Highland Railways, and the Thurso Branch Line. Born in London “within the sounds of Paddington Station”, he spent many days in Euston Station, with a platform ticket and a lunch box, watching all the comings and goings. In 1953 he got his first camera and when on holiday in Thurso, he photographed the Station and quizzed the Station Master and that was the start of this project. He took many photographs with detailed descriptions written next to them, gathered cuttings from local newspapers and magazines, and researched other sources, as well as asking friends and retired Railway Staff for their memories. Custodial history: RECORDS’ CONTENT Description: Research by J.H.M. Williamson on the Highland Railways, and the Thurso Branch Line. Including articles, books, photographs and Journals. Appraisal: Accruals: RECORDS’ CONDITION OF ACCESS AND USE Nucleus: The Nuclear and Caithness Archives 1 Access: Open Closed until: Access conditions: Available within the Archive searchroom Copying: Copying permitted within standard Copyright Act parameters Finding aids: Available in Archive searchroom ALLIED MATERIALS Related material: See Index to P924 North Highland Railway Photographs, available within Archive Searchroom P145 Photographs of Highland Railway Steam Trains P538 Highland Railway Timetables, 1909-1910 Publication: Notes: Date of catalogue: May 2019 Ref.
    [Show full text]