Kingston's First Patriots
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Darcy Sorensen
National winner Nt Young Historian Darcy Sorensen Casuarina senior college To what extent was Marquis de Lafayette, prior to 1834, responsible for social change? P a g e | 1 NATIONAL HISTORY CHALLENGE: MAKING A BETTER WORLD To what extent was Marquis de Lafayette, prior to 1834, responsible for positive social change? DARCY SORENSEN CASUARINA SENIOR COLLEGE Darwin, Northern Territory Word count: 1956 words P a g e | 2 Prior to 1834, Marquis de Lafayette was prominently responsible for positive social change. Given the title “hero of two worlds”1 Lafayette disobeyed the orders of Louis XXVI to fight for freedom in the American Revolution. Furthermore, influenced by the ideals of the American Revolution Lafayette worked to abolish slavery in America. In addition, with his position in the French National Assembly Lafayette helped install positive social change. Lafayette’s influence on positive social reforms was also present when he incessantly campaigned for the right to religious freedom in France. However, while his influence was predominantly positive, Lafayette’s influence on society plummeted with his involvement in the Champ De Mars Massacre. On “June 13th, 1777”2 Marquis de Lafayette disobeyed the French government and journeyed to America to fight in the American Revolution. By defying the orders of King Louis XVI Lafayette became one of the key individuals who ensured the freedom of America from Britain’s rule. A significant instance of Lafayette’s military prowess in the fight for freedom was at the Battle of the Brandywine beginning “September 11th, 1777”3. Despite being Lafayette’s first battle, and suffering a bullet wound to the leg, the Frenchman “gallantly fought on and rallied the troops, facilitating an orderly retreat”4 of the troops that saved many lives. -
Becoming Valley Forge Regional Fiction Award Release
PO Box 207, Paoli, Pennsylvania 19301 [email protected] 610-296-4966 (p) 610-644-4436 (f) www.TheElevatorGroup.com NEWS RELEASE – FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE – 4/25/16 Contact: Sheilah Vance 610-296-4966 Email: [email protected] Sheilah Vance’s new novel, Becoming Valley Forge, wins Regional Fiction category in the Next Generation Indie Book Awards PAOLI, PA—Award-winning author Sheilah Vance’s new novel, Becoming Valley Forge, (January 2016, 564 pp., $17.95, The Elevator Group, ISBN 978-0-9824945-9-2) won the category of Regional Fiction in the Next Generation Indie Book Awards, the largest non-profit awards program open to independent publishers and authors worldwide. Vance will receive a gold medal and cash award at a reception held during Book Expo America on May 11, 2016 in Chicago. “I’m very pleased that Becoming Valley Forge received this honor,” said Vance. “My novel certainly tells the story of what happened when the war came to the backyards of ordinary people who lived in the Philadelphia region during the Philadelphia Campaign of the Revolutionary War.” The Midwest Book Review, in April 2016, said of Becoming Valley Forge, “Although a work of fiction, author Sheilah Vance has included a great deal of historically factual background details in her stirring saga of a novel. Impressively well written from beginning to end, "Becoming Valley Forge" is highly recommended for both community and academic library Historical Fiction collections.” Becoming Valley Forge dramatically answers the question of what happens when the war comes to your backyard. In this case the war is the Revolutionary War, and the backyards are of those people in the Valley Forge area whose lives were disrupted during the Philadelphia Campaign, a series of battles and maneuvers from the Battle of Brandywine on September 11, 1777 to the encampment at Valley Forge from December 1777 to June 1778. -
ESSSAR Masthead
EMPIRE PATRIOT Empire State Society of the Sons of the American Revolution Descendants of America’s First Soldiers Volume 10 Issue 1 February 2008 Printed Four Times Yearly THE CONCLUSION OF . THE PHILADELPHIA CAMPAIGN In Summary: We started this journey several issues ago beginning with . LANDING AT THE HEAD OF ELK - Over 260 British ships arrived at Head of Elk, Maryland. Washington was ready. The trip took overly long, horses died by the hundreds. British General Howe was anxious to move on, but first he had to unload his massive armada. ON THE MARCH TO BRANDYWINE - Howe heads for Philadelphia. Washington blocks the path. On the way to their first engagement of 1777, Washington exposes himself to capture, Howe misses an opportunity, the rains fall, and everyone seems prepared for what happens next. THE BATTLE OF BRANDYWINE- The first battle in the campaign. Howe conceives and executes a daring 17 mile march catching Washington by surprise. The Continental Army is impressive, but the day belongs to the British. THE BATTLE OF THE CLOUDS Both armies were poised for another major engagement Five days after the Battle of Brandywine, a confrontation is rained out PAOLI MASSACRE Bloody bayonets in a midnight raid Mad” Anthony Wayne, assigned to attack the rear guard of the British army, is himself surprised in a “dirty” early morning raid. MARCH TO GERMANTOWN Washington prepares to win back the capital Congress flees Philadelphia as the British occupy the city amid chaos and fear. THE BATTLE OF GERMANTOWN The battle is fought in and around a mansion. For the first time the British retreat during battle, but fog and confusion turned the American advance around. -
Battle of Valcour Island - Wikipedia
Battle of Valcour Island - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Valcour_Island Coordinates: 44°36′37.84″N 73°25′49.39″W From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The naval Battle of Valcour Island, also known as the Battle of Valcour Bay, took place on October 11, 1776, on Battle of Valcour Island Lake Champlain. The main action took place in Valcour Part of the American Revolutionary War Bay, a narrow strait between the New York mainland and Valcour Island. The battle is generally regarded as one of the first naval battles of the American Revolutionary War, and one of the first fought by the United States Navy. Most of the ships in the American fleet under the command of Benedict Arnold were captured or destroyed by a British force under the overall direction of General Guy Carleton. However, the American defense of Lake Champlain stalled British plans to reach the upper Hudson River valley. The Continental Army had retreated from Quebec to Fort Royal Savage is shown run aground and burning, Ticonderoga and Fort Crown Point in June 1776 after while British ships fire on her (watercolor by British forces were massively reinforced. They spent the unknown artist, ca. 1925) summer of 1776 fortifying those forts, and building additional ships to augment the small American fleet Date October 11, 1776 already on the lake. General Carleton had a 9,000 man Location near Valcour Bay, Lake Champlain, army at Fort Saint-Jean, but needed to build a fleet to carry Town of Peru / Town of Plattsburgh, it on the lake. -
The Time Trial of Benedict Arnold 1 National Museum of American History
The Time Trial of Benedict Arnold 1 National Museum of American History The Time Trial of Benedict Arnold Purpose By debating the legacy of Benedict Arnold, students will build reasoning and critical thinking skills and an understanding of the complexity of historical events and historical memory. Program Summary In this presentation, offered as a public program at the National Museum of American History from December 2010-April 2011, an actor portrays a fictionalized Benedict Arnold, hero and villain of the American Revolution. Arnold, in dialogue with an audience that is facilitated by an arbiter, discusses his notable actions at the Battle of Saratoga and at Valcour Island, as well as his decision to sell the plans for West Point to the British. At the conclusion of the program, audience members consider how history should remember Arnold, as a traitor, or as a hero. This set of materials is designed to provide you an opportunity to have a similar debate with your students. Included in this resource set are a full video of the program, to be used as preparation for the classroom activity, and Arnold’s conversation with the audience divided by theme, to be used with the resources offered below for your own Time Trial of Benedict Arnold. A full version of the program is available here. [https://vimeo.com/129257467] Grade levels 5-8 Time Three 45 minute periods National Standards National Center for History in the Schools: United States History Standards; Era 3: Revolution and the New Nation (1754-1820s); Standard 2: The impact of the American Revolution on politics, economy, and society Common Core Standards for Literacy in History and Social Studies: Speaking and Listening Standards Comprehension and Collaboration, standard 1: Grades 6-8: Engage effectively in a range of collaborative discussions (one-on-one, in groups, and teacher- led) with diverse partners on grade level topics, texts, and issues, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly. -
Cradle of Texas Chapter #33 Sons of the American Revolution
Sons of the American Revolution Cradle of Texas Crier Cradle of Texas Chapter # 33 www.cradletxsar.org Volume 20, Number 10 May 2018 Michael J. Bailey, Editor . May Next Meeting family; Patty Jensen – DAR; Mark & 11:30 a.m. Brenda Hansen; Bud & Mary May 12, 2018 Northington. Fat Grass Restaurant RECOGNITION OF COMPATRIOTS: 1717 7th Street President Beall asked that we keep Arthur Evans and Ted Bates and Mary Bay City, Texas Ruth Rhodenbaugh in our thoughts and prayers. Program: GET TO KNOW YOUR COMPATRIOTS: Thomas I. Jackson Kinnan Stockton gave a brief history of Texas SAR, State Society President his youth and education in Louise and El Campo, returning after college to join MEETING MINUTES the 1st State Bank and later becoming its Sons of the American current president. He followed with Revolution information about his Patriot, John Stockton, who’s uncle Richard Stockton Cradle of Texas Chapter #33 April 14, 2018 was the only signer of the Declaration of Independence who was captured by the The Sons of the American Revolution British, imprisoned, starved and locked st met April 14, 2018 at 1 State Bank, 206 in irons with little protection from the North Street Louise, Texas. SAR freezing weather. He was pardoned by President Ray Beall called the meeting General Howe after General to order at 11:36 a.m. Chaplain Michael Washington protested he “shocking and Bailey gave the invocation and blessing inhuman treatment”. for the meal, and Secretary Winston Avera led the Chapter in the U.S., Texas MINUTES: and SAR pledges. President Beall called for approval of the February minutes. -
Naval Documents of the American Revolution
Naval Documents of The American Revolution Volume 6 AMERICAN THEATRE: Aug. 1, 1776–Oct. 31, 1776 EUROPEAN THEATRE: May 26, 1776–Oct. 5, 1776 Part 1 of 8 United States Government Printing Office Washington, 1972 Electronically published by American Naval Records Society Bolton Landing, New York 2012 AS A WORK OF THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THIS PUBLICATION IS IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN. NAVAL DOCUMENTS OF The American Revolution Continental Gunboat Philadelphia. NAVAL DOCUMENTS OF The American Revolution VOLUME 6 AMERICAN THEATRE: Aug. 1, 1776-Oct. 31, 1776 EUROPEAN THEATRE: May 26, 1776-Oct. 5, 1776 WILLIAM JAMES MORGAN, Editor With a Foreword by PRESIDENT RICHARD NIXON And an Introduction by VICE ADMIRAL EDWIN B. HOOPER, USN (Ret.) Director of Naval History NAVAL HISTORY DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY WASHINGTON: 1972 I LC. Card No. 64-60087 I For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price $18.40 domestic postpaid or $17.25 GPO Bookstore Each volume of this series is a reminder of the key role played by the late William Bell Clark, initial editor. Drawing upon his deep knowledge of the Navy in the American Revolution, his initial selections and arrangements of materials compiled over a devoted lifetime provided a framework on which subsequent efforts have continued to build. SECRETARY OF THE NAVY'S ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON NAVAL HISTORY James P. Baxter, I11 (Emeritus) Jim Dan Hill Samuel Flagg Bemis (Emeritus) Elmer L. Kayser Francis L. Berkeley, Jr. John Haskell Kemble Julian P. Boyd Leonard W. Labaree Marion V. -
David Fanning and Retaliatory Violence Between Tories and Whigs in the Revolutionary Carolinas
“Blood for blood”: David Fanning and Retaliatory Violence between Tories and Whigs in the Revolutionary Carolinas By: Gregory Mayr History 586: Advanced Seminar in History Kansas State University Spring 2014 Professor Louise Breen Abstract This paper, relying primarily on Loyalist Colonel David Fanning’s personal narrative of the American Revolution, will argue that Fanning applied, in some of his actions, a form of retributive reasoning similar to that described by Historians Wayne E. Lee and Jeffrey J. Crow as typical for the revolutionary Carolinas. In Fanning’s case, the code by which he decided what to do in given situations was more complex than a one-dimensional law of retaliation; Fanning made an effort to incorporate conventional forms of honor into his actions, but harbored a great deal of distrust for his adversaries that came out of the experiences he had during the Revolution with his Whig opponents. His targets were purposive, aimed at Whig leadership, supplies and government officials. Fanning’s level of violence escalated toward the end of the revolution due to his genuine disdain for the rebels and his resentment at fighting what he eventually acknowledged to be a losing war. Keywords: Fanning; Retaliation; Retribution; lex talionis; Burke 2 On 28 February 1782, the infamous loyalist partisan David Fanning wrote a cold and threatening letter of protest to Governor Thomas Burke of North Carolina. The Whig government had hanged “three of my men, one Captain and two privates,” and was detaining an additional “Captain and six men under the sentence of death.”1 Fanning knew that the British cause had entered its death throes with the definitive American victory at Yorktown, Virginia, in October, 1781, but fighting units remained mobilized until the signing of the peace treaty in 1783, and in the meantime governments throughout the former colonies had to make decisions about how to deal with the militia men who continued the civil war in the southern frontier. -
Brandywine Battlefield Preservation Plan: Revolution in the Peaceful Valley (Map Atlas)
December, 2013 Brandywine MAP ATLAS Battlefield Preservation Plan Revolution in the Peaceful Valley CHESTER AND DELAWARE COUNTIES, PA Prepared by Chester County Planning Commission & John Milner Associates, Inc. Funded by The American Battlefi eld The 7th Preservation Program Pennsylvania Regiments (ABPP Grant Number Brandywine Flag GA-2255-11-003) The Brandywine Battlefield Preservation Plan: Revolution in the Peaceful Valley (Map Atlas) December 2013 Funded by the American Battlefield Preservation Program ABPP Grant Number GA-2255-11-003 Prepared by the Chester County Planning Commission & John Milner Associates, Inc. Chester County Board of Commissioners Delaware County Council Ryan Costello Tom McGarrigle Kathi Cozzone Mario J. Civera, Jr. Terence Farrell John P. McBlain Colleen P. Morrone Chester County Planning Commission David J. White Ronald T. Bailey, Executive Director David Ward, Assistant Director Delaware County Planning Department Carol Stauffer, Director, Planning Services Division John E. Pickett, Director of Planning* Christopher Bittle, Graphic Artist, Photographer Yinka Adesubokan, Associate Planner Yvonne Guthrie, Administrative Assistant Beverly Barnes, Historic Preservation Planner Elizabeth Kolb, Graphic Artists Jill Hall, Historic Preservation Planner Karen Marshall, Historic Preservation Officer Jake Michael, Project Manager Record copies of this document can be obtained Tyler Semder, GIS Specialist from: Jeannine Speirs, Senior Planner Kristen L. McMasters National Park Service John Milner and Associates American Battlefield Protection Program Wade Catts, Associate Director 1201 Eye Street NW (2287) Tom Scofield, Preservation Planner Washington, DC 20005 Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Disclaimer: Commission This material is based upon work assisted by a James M. Vaughan, Executive Director grant from the Department of the Interior, Barbara Franco, Executive Director* National Park Service. -
The Impact of Weather on Armies During the American War of Independence, 1775-1781 Jonathan T
Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2011 The Force of Nature: The Impact of Weather on Armies during the American War of Independence, 1775-1781 Jonathan T. Engel Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES THE FORCE OF NATURE: THE IMPACT OF WEATHER ON ARMIES DURING THE AMERICAN WAR OF INDEPENDENCE, 1775-1781 By JONATHAN T. ENGEL A Thesis submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2011 The members of the committee approve the thesis of Jonathan T. Engel defended on March 18, 2011. __________________________________ Sally Hadden Professor Directing Thesis __________________________________ Kristine Harper Committee Member __________________________________ James Jones Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members. ii This thesis is dedicated to the glory of God, who made the world and all things in it, and whose word calms storms. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Colonies may fight for political independence, but no human being can be truly independent, and I have benefitted tremendously from the support and aid of many people. My advisor, Professor Sally Hadden, has helped me understand the mysteries of graduate school, guided me through the process of earning an M.A., and offered valuable feedback as I worked on this project. I likewise thank Professors Kristine Harper and James Jones for serving on my committee and sharing their comments and insights. -
Environment and Culture in the Northeastern Americas During the American Revolution Daniel S
The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fogler Library Spring 5-11-2019 Navigating Wilderness and Borderland: Environment and Culture in the Northeastern Americas during the American Revolution Daniel S. Soucier University of Maine, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd Part of the Canadian History Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Military History Commons, Nature and Society Relations Commons, Other History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Soucier, Daniel S., "Navigating Wilderness and Borderland: Environment and Culture in the Northeastern Americas during the American Revolution" (2019). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 2992. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/2992 This Open-Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NAVIGATING WILDERNESS AND BORDERLAND: ENVIRONMENT AND CULTURE IN THE NORTHEASTERN AMERICAS DURING THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION By Daniel S. Soucier B.A. University of Maine, 2011 M.A. University of Maine, 2013 C.A.S. University of Maine, 2016 A THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (in History) The Graduate School University of Maine May, 2019 Advisory Committee: Richard Judd, Professor Emeritus of History, Co-Adviser Liam Riordan, Professor of History, Co-Adviser Stephen Miller, Professor of History Jacques Ferland, Associate Professor of History Stephen Hornsby, Professor of Anthropology and Canadian Studies DISSERTATION ACCEPTANCE STATEMENT On behalf of the Graduate Committee for Daniel S. -
The Search for Security Maine After Penobscot
Maine History Volume 21 Number 3 Article 2 1-1-1982 The Search for Security Maine after Penobscot James S. Leamon Bates College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/mainehistoryjournal Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Leamon, James S.. "The Search for Security Maine after Penobscot." Maine History 21, 3 (1982): 119-154. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/mainehistoryjournal/vol21/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maine History by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JAMES S. LEAMON T he Search for Security Maine after Penobscot The Penobscot campaign of 1779 made little impact on the military outcome of the American Revolution. The focus of military action was shifting to the southern states when the British seized Bagaduce (Castine) at the mouth of the Penobscot River and defeated the expedition dispatched by Massachusetts to drive them out.1 For people in the District of Maine, however, the Penobscot defeat represented a calamity of the first order. During the rest of the war, they had to contend with a garrison of regular British troops in their midst. To Bagaduce flocked loyalists who, with a vigor sharpened by vengeance, joined the regulars in plundering the coast. Active loyalist participation injected a new note of personal vindictiveness in what now became a civil war. Amid internal dissension and a growing sense of isolation and despair, unified defense collapsed throughout the District.