Major Projects

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Major Projects Major Projects S/N Image Project Description Height: 468m Built Up Area: 686,000sqm 1 Chongqing Rui'an Phase II Steel Tonnage: 67,000MT The tallest building in west China. Height: 350.6m 2 Shenyang Hang Lung Plaza Built Up Area: 480,000sqm Steel Tonnage: 60,000MT Height: 309m 3 Hefei Evergrande Center Built Up Area: 247,600sqm Steel Tonnage: 21,800MT Height: 170m Hangzhou Wanyin International 4 Built Up Area: 92,000sqm Building Steel Tonnage: 12,000MT S/N Image Project Description Height: 597m Built Up Area: 370,000sqm 5 Tianjin Goldin 117 Tower Steel Tonnage: 120,000MT The tallest building in north China. Height: 384m 6 Shenzhen Shun Hing Square Built Up Area: 150,000sqm Steel Tonnage: 25,000MT Height: 492m Built Up Area: 380,000sqm 7 Shanghai World Finance Center Steel Tonnage: 67,000MT The tallestroof height in the world in that time. Height: 342m 8 Zhenjiang Suning Plaza Built Up Area: 390,000sqm Steel Tonnage: 28,000MT S/N Image Project Description Height: 400m Shenzhen China Resources 9 Built Up Area: 260,000sqm Building Steel Tonnage: 33,000MT Height: 208m Shanghai Taiping Financial 10 Built Up Area: 110,000sqm Tower Steel Tonnage: 11,000MT Height: 432m Guangzhou International 11 Built Up Area: 450,000sqm Financial Center Steel Tonnage: 40,000MT Height: 660m (5 basement + 118 tower) Built Up Area: 450,000sqm Steel Tonnage: 100,000MT Height: 660m (5 basement + 118 12 Guangzhou Taikoo Hui Plaza tower) Built Up Area: 450,000sqm Steel Tonnage: 100,000MT Height: 212m Built Up Area: 460,000sqm Steel Tonnage: 19,000MT S/N Image Project Description Height: 234m Built Up Area: 550,000sqm Beijing CCTV New Office 13 Steel Tonnage: 140,000MT Building The biggest steel structure building in the world in terms of steel tonnage. Height: 438m 14 Wuhan Center Built Up Area: 360,000sqm Steel Tonnage: 43,000MT Height: 339m 15 Wuxi IFC Built Up Area: 230,000sqm Steel Tonnage: 20,000MT Height: 165.3m 16 Shenzhen Development Center Built Up Area: 76,000sqm Steel Tonnage: 11,000MT S/N Image Project Description Height: 452m Changsha International 17 Built Up Area: 994,000sqm Financial Center Steel Tonnage: 52,000MT Height: 480m Tianjin R&F Guangdong 18 Built Up Area: 420,000sqm Building Steel Tonnage: 55,000MT Height: 210m Shanghai Pingan Financial 19 Built Up Area: 165,000sqm Building Steel Tonnage: 23,000MT Height: 208m 20 Shanghai CMBC Building Built Up Area: 126,000sqm Steel Tonnage: 14,000MT S/N Image Project Description Height: 528m Built Up Area: 440,000sqm 21 Beijing China Zun(Z15) Steel Tonnage: 125,000MT The tallest building in Beijing. Height: 280m Shenzhen Jaben Huanggang 22 Built Up Area: 130,000sqm Century Center Steel Tonnage: 3,500MT Height: 530m Guangzhou CTF Financial 23 Built Up Area: 500,000sqm Center Steel Tonnage: 90,000MT Height: 252m 24 Beijing Yintai Center Built Up Area: 350,000sqm Steel Tonnage: 20,000MT S/N Image Project Description Height: 339m 25 Tianjin Modern Town Built Up Area: 253,700sqm Steel Tonnage: 23,700MT Height: 255m Changsha Windey Central 26 Built Up Area: 262,000sqm Square Steel Tonnage: 5,000MT Height: 339.88m 27 Xiamen International Center Built Up Area: 185,600sqm Steel Tonnage: 47,000MT Height: 490m HongKong International Built Up Area: 510,000sqm 28 Commerce Center Steel Tonnage: 32,000MT Tallest building in Hong Kong. S/N Image Project Description Height: 350m 29 Shenzhen Centre Built Up Area: 158,000sqm Steel Tonnage: 25,000MT Commencement Date: 15th Sep 2016 Contract Duration: 100 Calendar Days 30 Warehouse at Zibo City Completion Date: 24th Dec 2016 Contract Sum: USD 1,025,700.00 Height: 240m Shenzhen Stock Exchange 31 Built Up Area: 270,000sqm Operations Center Steel Tonnage: 42,000MT Height: 660m Shenzhen Pingan International Built Up Area: 450,000sqm 32 Finance Center Steel Tonnage: 100,000MT The tallest building in south China. S/N Image Project Description Height: 606m Built Up Area: 300,000sqm 33 Wuhan Greenland Center Steel Tonnage: 100,000MT The tallest building in central China. Height: 441.8m 34 Shenzhen Kingkey 100 Built Up Area: 550,000sqm Steel Tonnage: 65,000MT Height: 450m Suzhou International Financial 35 Built Up Area: 364,000sqm Center Steel Tonnage: 61,000MT .
Recommended publications
  • Dynamic Elasto-Plastic Analysis of a Super High-Rise Hybrid Structure
    th The 14 World Conference on Earthquake Engineering October 12-17, 2008, Beijing, China DYNAMIC ELASTO-PLASTIC ANALYSIS OF A SUPER HIGH-RISE HYBRID STRUCTURE JIANG Jun1 HAO Jiping1 HU Ming2 LI Kangning2 LI Yangcheng1 YOU Bing2 1 School of civil Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology, Xi’an, China 2 LANTO Consulting Architects & Engineers Co.,Ltd ,Shenzhen ,China Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT : Dynamic elasto-plastic analysis methods can actually indicate the characteristic of structure, and it is considered as an accurate method. This paper is concerned with the seismic performance evaluation of a super high-rise hybrid structure on a background of project by using nonlinear dynamic procedure (NDP). By reasonable selection of input ground motions which include three natural earthquake records and a group of artificial waves, and based on some assumptions and considerations, the nonlinear dynamic analyses are carried out by using CANNY program. Then the seismic responses of hybrid structure under three different earthquake intensities are obtained. Comparing the responses of three levels with preestablished performance objective, the results show that all responses meet the requirements. At the same time, the inter-storey shear drifts are mentioned to judge the seismic behaviors of hybrid structure. Based on the large amount of structural response information, conclusion can be drawn that the super high-rise hybrid structure achieves the earthquake performance objective. KEYWORDS: hybrid structure, dynamic analysis, resorting force model, inter-storey drift 1. INTRODUCTION With the development of performance-based seismic design (PBSD), the more demands for performance of buildings need to be indicated by structural engineers.
    [Show full text]
  • Economics Planning of Super Tall Buildings in Asia Pacific Cities
    Economics Planning of Super Tall Buildings in Asia Pacific Cities Dr Paul H K HO, Hong Kong SAR, China Key words: economics planning, super tall building, Asia Pacific SUMMARY The purpose of this paper is to study the economics planning of super tall office buildings in Asia Pacific cities. This study is based on the case study of the Asia Pacific’s 10 tallest buildings which are distributed over six major cities. All are landmark buildings with similar functions. From the analysis of the collected data, the floor plate of these buildings is comparatively large, thus achieving a fairly high lettable to gross floor ratio of about 80% and low wall to floor area ratio of about 0.33. The most common lease span is approximately 12m with column-free between its service core and exterior window. The most common floor-to-floor height is about 4.0m. Square or similar plan is the most common geometry in super tall buildings since this geometry offers the same stiffness in both directions against lateral wind forces. Typically the building is in form of a large podium at lower levels with a setback in the overall floor plan dimension in the main tower and a slightly tapered shape at its top floors. The central core approach in which the core is designed as a structural element to provide stability is commonly used in super tall buildings. By using slip-form or jump-form techniques, a 3 to 4-day cycle is achievable for core wall construction which is similar to steel construction.
    [Show full text]
  • Signature Redacted Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering May 21, 2015
    TRENDS AND INNOVATIONS IN HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS OVER THE PAST DECADE ARCHIVES 1 by MASSACM I 1TT;r OF 1*KCHN0L0LGY Wenjia Gu JUL 02 2015 B.S. Civil Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2014 LIBRAR IES SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ENGINEERING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY JUNE 2015 C2015 Wenjia Gu. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known of hereafter created. Signature of Author: Signature redacted Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering May 21, 2015 Certified by: Signature redacted ( Jerome Connor Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering Thesis Supervisor Accepted bv: Signature redacted ?'Hei4 Nepf Donald and Martha Harleman Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering Chair, Departmental Committee for Graduate Students TRENDS AND INNOVATIONS IN HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS OVER THE PAST DECADE by Wenjia Gu Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering on May 21, 2015 in Partial Fulfillment of the Degree Requirements for Master of Engineering in Civil and Environmental Engineering ABSTRACT Over the past decade, high-rise buildings in the world are both booming in quantity and expanding in height. One of the most important reasons driven the achievement is the continuously evolvement of structural systems. In this paper, previous classifications of structural systems are summarized and different types of structural systems are introduced. Besides the structural systems, innovations in other aspects of today's design of high-rise buildings including damping systems, construction techniques, elevator systems as well as sustainability are presented and discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Shun Hing Square Fact Sheet
    Shun Hing Square Fact Sheet This fact sheet was downloaded on Friday October 1, 2021 from The Skyscraper Center. Please visit the CTBUH website for more on tall buildings. view building webpage Images Facts Former / Other Name Di Wang Commercial Centre Type building Status completed No image to display Country City Shenzhen Street Address 5002 Shennan Road East Building Function office Structural Material composite Start of Construction 1993 Completion 1996 Global Ranking #37 tallest building in the world Regional Ranking #25 tallest building in Asia (excluding the Middle East) National Ranking #19 tallest building in City Ranking #4 tallest building in Shenzhen Companies Figures Owner Height: Architectural 384.00 meter / 1259.84 feet • Current Kumagai Gumi Height: Occupied 298.00 meter / 977.69 feet Developer Karbony Investment Height: To Tip 384.00 meter / 1259.84 feet Architects Height: Observatory 298.09 meter / 977.99 feet • Design American Design Associates; K.Y. Floors Above Ground 69 Cheung Design Associates Floors Below Ground 3 Structural Engineers # of Elevators 36 • Design Maunsell AECOM Group Top Elevator Speed 5 m/s • Peer Review Leslie E. Robertson Associates Tower GFA 280,000 m sq. / 3,013,895 ft sq. MEP Engineer Associated Consulting Engineers # of Parking Spaces 900 Main Contractors China State Construction Engineering Corporation; Hong Kong Construction (Holdings) Limited; Kumagai Gumi Other Consultants • Civil AECOM • Cost Rider Levett Bucknall • Geotechnical AECOM • Vertical Transportation Mitsubishi Elevator and Escalator • Wind Alan G. Davenport Wind Engineering Group; RWDI Material Suppliers • Construction Hoists Alimak Hek • Elevator Mitsubishi Elevator and Escalator • Sealants Dow Corning Corporation • Steel China Construction Steel Structure Corporation; Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation.
    [Show full text]
  • Semi-Annual Report 2019
    CSG HOLDING CO., LTD. SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT 2019 Chairman of the Board: CHEN LIN August 2019 CSG Semi-annual Report 2019 Section I Important Notice, Content and Paraphrase Board of Directors and the Supervisory Committee of CSG Holding Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Company) and its directors, supervisors and senior executives hereby confirm that there are no any fictitious statements, misleading statements, or important omissions carried in this report, and shall take all responsibilities, individual and/or joint, for the facticity, accuracy and completeness of the whole contents. Ms. Chen Lin, Chairman of the Board, Mr. Wang Jian, responsible person in charge of accounting and Ms.Wang Wenxin, principal of the financial department (accounting officer) confirm that the Financial Report enclosed in the semi-annual report of the Company is true, accurate and complete. All directors were present at the meeting of the Board for deliberating the semi-annual report of the Company in person. This report involves future plans and some other forward-looking statements, which shall not be considered as virtual promises to investors. Investors are kindly reminded to pay attention to possible risks. Details of the risk factors and countermeasures of future development have been well-described in this report, please find in Section IV Performance Discussion and Analysis. The Company has no plans of cash dividend distribution, bonus shares being sent or converting capital reserve into share capital. This report is prepared both in Chinese and English. Should there be any inconsistency between the Chinese and English versions, the Chinese version shall prevail. 1 CSG Semi-annual Report 2019 Content Section I Important Notice, Content and Paraphrase .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SPACE EFFICIENCY in HIGH-RISE OFFICE BUILDINGS Ayşin SEV and Aydan ÖZGEN
    METUSPACE JFA EFFICIENCY 2009/2 IN HIGH-RISE OFFICE BUILDINGS DOI:METU 10.4305/METU.JFA.2009.2.4 JFA 2009/2 69 (26:2) 69-89 SPACE EFFICIENCY IN HIGH-RISE OFFICE BUILDINGS Ayşin SEV and Aydan ÖZGEN Received: 19.11.2008, Final Text: 30.07.2009 INTRODUCTION Keywords: high-rise office building; space efficiency; floor slab; gross floor area; High-rise office buildings (1), which are developed as a response net floor area; structural system, core to population growth, rapid urbanization and economic cycles, are configuration. indispensable for a metropolitan city development. In 1930, Clark and 1. The authors would like to thank all those Kingston (cited in Klaber, 1930) made the following observations The who provided data to make this research possible. skyscraper: A study in the economic height of modern office buildings: “Given the high land values in central business sections of our leading cities, the skyscraper is not only the most efficient, but the only economic utilization of certain strategic plots. An exhaustive investigation… has conclusively demonstrated that the factors making for diminishing returns in the intensive development of such plots are more than offset by the factors making for increasing returns…” (Klaber, 1930). This statement holds true for today; however, the relationship between cost and benefit is more complex in today’s global marketplace. The political ideology of the city plays an important role in the globalization process (Newman and Tornely, 2005; Abu-Ghazalah, 2007). The current trend for constructing office buildings is to build higher and higher, and developers tend to compete with one another on heights.
    [Show full text]
  • Vexed Foundations: an Ethnographic Interpretation of the Shenzhen Built Environment
    Mary Ann O’Donnell, Editor, Architectural Worlds, School of Architecture, Shenzhen University Email: [email protected] Presented at Vexed Urbanism: A Symposium on Design and the Social, The New School, New York, Feb 13-15, 2008. Vexed Foundations: An Ethnographic Interpretation of the Shenzhen Built Environment FORM OF THE QUESTION—INNER CITY VILLAGES (市中村) In this paper, I address an issue long dear to anthropological hearts—possible forms of cultural continuity despite and within rapidly changing societies. In doing so, I end up discussing the administrative structure of the Chinese state and the enabling conditions of imagining new forms of the Chinese nation. My study departs from the observation that despite the Chinese central government’s ideological, organizational, and architectural transformation of agrarian Baoan County into urban Shenzhen Municipality, villages have not only remained a viable feature of the urban landscape, but have also flourished in new ways, providing housing, employment, education, and medical care for their respective villagers. Indeed, the remarkable transformation of Shenzhen village lifeways has not diminished village-based cultural identities, but rather strengthened them. Such is the paradox of cultural continuity in Shenzhen. Even though materially little remains of agrarian Baoan, nevertheless, villages claim cultural histories of over four hundred years. Moreover, non-villagers explain village behavior in terms of this history. In other words, villagers not only claim unique, non-Shenzhen identities, but other Shenzhen inhabitants recognize the validity of this claim. In fact, the persistence of village identity constitutes a serious political challenge for Shenzhen officials, who view the villages as impediments to “normal (正常)” modernization.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual 2015 Report the Most Sought-After Top-Notch Cultural Tourism Destination
    Evergrande Real Estate Group Limited 恒大地產集團有限公司 (incorporated in the Cayman Islands with limited liability) Stock Code: 3333 Annual 2015 Report The most sought-after top-notch cultural tourism destination ENTERTAINMENT BUSINESS EXHIBITION CONFERENCE CULTURE TRAVEL GUANGDONG PROVINCE HUBEI PROVINCE JIANGSU PROVINCE ANHUI PROVINCE JIANGXI PROVINCE JILIN PROVINCE 1 The Second Jinbi Garden Guangzhou 67 Evergrande Palace Wuhan 134 Evergrande Splendor Nanjing 189 Evergrande City Hefei 262 Evergrande City Nanchang 321 Evergrande Oasis Changchun 2 The Third Jinbi Garden Guangzhou 68 Evergrande Oasis Wuhan 135 Evergrande Palace Nanjing 190 Evergrande Royal View Garden Hefei 263 Evergrande Oasis Nanchang 322 Evergrande City Changchun 3 Evergrande Royal Palace Guangzhou 69 Evergrande City Wuhan 136 Evergrande Emerald Court Nanjing 191 Evergrande International Center Hefei 264 Evergrande Metropolis Nanchang 323 Evergrande International Center Changchun 4 Evergrande Scenic Garden Zengcheng Guangzhou 70 Evergrande Metropolis Wuhan 137 Evergrande Venice on the Sea Qidong 192 Evergrande Plaza Hefei 265 Evergrande Royal View Garden Nanchang 324 Evergrande Royal Scenic Changchun 5 Evergrande Jewelry Guangzhou 71 Evergrande Royal Scenic Bay Wuhan 138 Evergrande Metropolis Danyang 193 Evergrande Oasis Tongling 266 Evergrande Metropolis Jingdezhen 325 Evergrande Metropolis Changchun 6 Evergrande Royal Scenic Peninsula Foshan 72 Evergrande Splendor Ezhou 139 Evergrande City Danyang 194 Evergrande Palace Wuhu 267 Evergrande Atrium Xinyu 326 Evergrande City
    [Show full text]
  • Wuhan Center – a Sustainable Design Exploration for Skyscrapers
    ctbuh.org/papers Title: Wuhan Center – A Sustainable Design Exploration for Skyscrapers Authors: Weiping Xu, Architect, ECADI Xiaoqiong Ma, Senior Engineer, ECADI Subjects: Architectural/Design Façade Design Sustainability/Green/Energy Keywords: Energy Integrated Design Mixed-Use Sustainability Publication Date: 2012 Original Publication: CTBUH 2012 9th World Congress, Shanghai Paper Type: 1. Book chapter/Part chapter 2. Journal paper 3. Conference proceeding 4. Unpublished conference paper 5. Magazine article 6. Unpublished © Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat / Weiping Xu; Xiaoqiong Ma Case Study: Wuhan Center – A Sustainable Design Exploration for Skyscrapers 案例分析:武汉中心——超高层可持续设计的探索与实践 Abstract Embodying the “sail” concept, Wuhan Centre will be mixed-use, with urban retail spaces at the base, a unique mix of office, residential, and hotel with a visitor’s observatory at the 88th level, soaring 438 meters (1,427 feet) above Mengze Lake in Hunan Province. This paper analyzes several sustainable design features of Wuhan Centre, such as tower facade, integrated energy core and observation deck. It also explores architectural design optimization methods according to several skyscrapers designed by ECADI, not only depending on the techniques Weiping Xu Xiaoqiong Ma of sustainable building design technology, but also acceptable costs and considers the future increment. Weiping Xu & Xiaoqiong Ma Keywords: skyscraper facade, integrated energy core, observation deck, large spaces, East China Architectural Design & Research Institute sustainable design Co.,Ltd. 4F, 220 Sichuan Road (M) Shanghai, China, 200002 tel (电话): +86 13816676790, +86 13564102470 fax (传真): + 86 21 63211240 摘要 email (电子邮箱): [email protected]; mxq13775@ ecadi.com 由华东院原创设计的武汉中心,以引领CBD扬帆起航为设计理念;作为集办公、公寓、 www.ecadi.com 酒店、商业和观光于一身的超高层综合体,建筑塔楼采用折叠式玻璃幕墙单元、高区能 Weiping Xu, National First-grade Registered Architect, 源芯筒、多功能观景层等一系列高性能化设计,旨在体现超高层综合体的可持续建筑设 Chief Architect in ECADI.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts BOOK
    CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR INTERNATIONAL CANCER IMMUNOTHERAPY CONFERENCE TRANSLATING SCIENCE INTO SURVIVAL SEPTEMBER 25th to 28th, 2019 - PARIS Abstracts BOOK www.cancerimmunotherapyconference.org SESSION A fined as complete response or partial response or stable disease POSTER SESSION A for at least 8 weeks) of 45% (17/38). ORR was 11% (2/19) in PD-L1 negative and 17% (2/12) in PD-L1 positive pts. Pts with 2 lines or more of prior therapy had an ORR of 20% (5/25), regardless of PD-L1 status. Treatment-related Grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 23% Combination therapies with immune of pts, with dehydration, hypotension, and myalgia as the most checkpoint blockers frequently reported (4.7% each), consistent with previous reports. Conclusion : Clinical activity was observed in mTNBC pts treated A001 / Clinical activity of BEMPEG plus NIVO observed in with BEMPEG plus NIVO, notably in pts with poor prognostic fea- tures or negative predictive clinical factors for CPI benefit, includ- metastatic TNBC : preliminary results from the TNBC co- ing negative PD-L1 status. Additional efficacy analyses, including hort of the Ph1/2 PIVOT-02 study ORR, duration of response, and biomarker analyses, will be pre- sented. These data support future development of this doublet in mTNBC pts who are PD-L1 negative at baseline, in combination Sara Tolaney (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Capucine Baldini with chemotherapy. This study (NCT02983045) and registration- (Institut Gustave Roussy), Alexander Spira (Virginia Cancer Spe- al studies in other solid tumor settings are ongoing. cialists), Daniel Cho (New York University Langone Medical Cen- ter - NYU Cancer Institute), Giovanni Grignani (Fondazione del Piemonte per l Oncologia IRCCS Candiolo), Dariusz Sawka (POO Keywords : BEMPEG, NKTR-214, Triple-negative breast cancer, Szpital Specjalistyczny w Brzozowie), Fabricio Racca (Instituto Nivolumab.
    [Show full text]
  • Evergrande Property Services Group Limited 恒大物業集團有限公司 (Incorporated in the Cayman Islands with Limited Liability) GLOBAL OFFERING
    Project Eagle_Cover_client_Eng_27mm.indd 所有頁面 19/11/2020 22:16:29 IMPORTANT If you are in any doubt about any of the contents of this Prospectus, you should obtain independent professional advice. Evergrande Property Services Group Limited 恒大物業集團有限公司 (Incorporated in the Cayman Islands with limited liability) GLOBAL OFFERING Number of Offer Shares : 1,621,622,000 Shares comprising 810,811,000 New Shares and 810,811,000 Sale Shares (subject to the Over-allotment Option) Number of Hong Kong Offer Shares : 162,163,000 New Shares (subject to reallocation) Number of International Offer Shares : 1,459,459,000 Shares comprising 648,648,000 New Shares and 810,811,000 Sale Shares (including 129,730,000 Reserved Shares under the Preferential Offering) (subject to reallocation and the Over-allotment Option) Maximum Offer Price : HK$9.75 per Offer Share, plus brokerage of 1%, Stock Exchange trading fee of 0.005% and SFC transaction levy of 0.0027%, payable in full on application subject to refund on final pricing Nominal Value : US$0.0001 per Share Stock Code : 6666 Joint Sponsors, Joint Global Coordinators and Joint Bookrunners Joint Bookrunners Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited, The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited and Hong Kong Securities Clearing Company Limited take no responsibility for the contents of this Prospectus, make no representation as to its accuracy or completeness, and expressly disclaim any liability whatsoever for any loss howsoever arising from or in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of this Prospectus. A copy of this Prospectus, having attached thereto the documents specified in “Appendix V—Documents Delivered to the Registrar of Companies and Available for Inspection—Documents Delivered to the Registrar of Companies” in this Prospectus, has been registered by the Registrar of Companies in Hong Kong as required by section 342C of the Companies (Winding Up and Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance of Hong Kong (Chapter 32 of the Laws of Hong Kong).
    [Show full text]
  • Offering Circular
    STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL — DO NOT FORWARD THIS OFFERING IS AVAILABLE ONLY TO INVESTORS WHO ARE NON-U.S. PERSONS OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES. IMPORTANT: You must read the following disclaimer before continuing. The following disclaimer applies to the offering memorandum attached to this e-mail. You are therefore advised to read this disclaimer carefully before reading, accessing or making any other use of the attached offering memorandum. In accessing the attached offering memorandum, you agree to be bound by the following terms and conditions including any modifications to them from time to time, each time you receive any information from us as a result of such access. Confirmation of Your Representation: You have accessed the attached offering memorandum on the basis that you have confirmed your representation to Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited, China Merchants Securities (HK) Co., Ltd. and Haitong International Securities Company Limited (the ‘‘Joint Lead Managers’’) that (1) you and any person you represent are non-U.S. persons outside the United States and to the extent you purchase the securities described in the attached offering memorandum, you will be doing so pursuant to Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the ‘‘Securities Act’’), and (2) that you consent to delivery of the attached offering memorandum and any amendments or supplements thereto by electronic transmission. The attached offering memorandum has been made available to you in electronic form. You are reminded that documents transmitted via this medium may be altered or changed during the process of transmission and consequently none of the Joint Lead Managers or any person who controls them or any of their directors, employees, representatives or affiliates accepts any liability or responsibility whatsoever in respect of any discrepancies between the offering memorandum distributed to you in electronic format and the hard copy version.
    [Show full text]