The Evolutionary Ecology of Weeds and Invasive Plants

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Evolutionary Ecology of Weeds and Invasive Plants Dekker: The Evolutionary Ecology of Weeds and Invasive Plants v.12.12.08 2009 Course Version ___________________________________________________________________________ The Evolutionary Ecology of Weeds and Invasive Plants Jack Dekker Weed Biology Laboratory Agronomy Department Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 50011 EMail: [email protected]; Web URL: www.public.iastate.edu/~jdekker ___________________________________________________________________________ 1 Dekker: The Evolutionary Ecology of Weeds and Invasive Plants Copyright 2009 Jack Dekker 2 Dekker: The Evolutionary Ecology of Weeds and Invasive Plants TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE FORWARD 11 INTRODUCTION 13 Approach to weed biology The weeds always win The evolutionary ecology of weeds and invasive plants UNIT 1: THE NATURE OF WEEDS 17 1 The Nature of Weeds 19 1.1 Definitions of a weed 1.2 Terminology of other weedy plant types 1.3 Weeds defined by their traits UNIT 2: WEED EVOLUTION 23 2 Natural Selection and Weedy Adaptation 25 2.1 Evolution, adaptation and natural selection 2.2 Evolution 2.3 Adaptation 2.4 Natural selection 2.4.1 Process of natural selection: 2.4.1.1 Reproduction 2.4.1.2 Heredity and inheritance 2.4.1.3 Variation in fitness of organisms 2.4.1.4 Variation in individuals and traits 2.4.2 Units of selection 2.4.3 Selection and population diversity 2.5 Genotypes and phenotypes 2.6 Genetic Variation 2.6.1 Mating system variation 2.6.1.1 Apomictic species 2.6.1.2 Self-pollinating species 2.6.1.3 Out-crossing species 2.6.2 Sources of genetic diversity 2.6.2.1 Forces increasing population diversity 2.6.2.3 Forces decreasing population diversity 2.7 Phenotypic Variation 2.7.1 Phenotypic plasticity 2.7.2 Somatic polymorphism 2.8 Speciation 2.8.1 Process of speciation 2.8.2 Reproductive isolating mechanisms 2.8.3 Modes of speciation 3 Dekker: The Evolutionary Ecology of Weeds and Invasive Plants UNIT 3: AGRICULTURAL COMMUNITY DYNAMICS 57 3 Opportunity Space-Time 59 3.1 Local opportunity: space and time 3.2 Weedy habitats 3.3 Niches in the local community 3.4 Local opportunity space-time structure 3.4.1 The niche hypervolume 3.4.2 Four dimensions of the niche hypervolume 3.4.2.1 Spatial heterogeneity and patchiness 3.4.2.1.1 Lateral heterogeneity of environments 3.4.2.1.2 Vertical heterogeneity of environments 3.4.2.1.3 Selection in a patchy environment 3.4.2.1.4 Dispersal mechanisms set the scale of a plant's spatial heterogeneity 3.4.2.2 Temporal division of the environment 3.4.2.3 Disturbance 3.4.2.3.1 Disturbance: local opportunity 3.4.2.3.2 Dimensionality of disturbance 3.4.2.3.3 Proximity of disturbance effects 3.4.2.3.4 Vulnerability to disturbance 3.4.2.3.5 Temporal patterns in disturbance 3.4.2.4 Differential use of resources and conditions 3.5 Limiting resources-conditions in local opportunity space-time 3.5.1 Limiting resources in the environment 3.5.1.1 Light as resource 3.5.1.2 Water as resource 3.5.1.3 Mineral nutrients as resources 3.5.1.4 Gases as resources 3.5.2 Pervasive conditions in the environment: heat 4 Plant Invasions 73 4.1 Seizing, exploiting and occupying opportunity space-time 4.2 The plant invasion process 4.2.1 The invasion matrix 4.2.2 Dispersal 4.2.3 Colonization 4.2.4 Enduring occupation of a locality 4.2.5 Extinction 4.4 The perception of plant invasion 4.4.1 Human values 4.4.2 Conclusions 4.4.2.1 The human role in creating opportunity space for plant invasion 4 Dekker: The Evolutionary Ecology of Weeds and Invasive Plants 4.4.2.2 Utilizing and exploiting beneficial plant invasive species 5 Plant Community Structure 81 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Weed Biodiversity 5.2.1 Introduction 5.2.2 Biodiversity levels within a habitat 5.2.3 Stability, sustainability and biodiversity in plant communities 5.3 Weed community structure 5.3.1 Population genetic structure 5.3.1.1 Introduction 5.3.1.2 Case study: The weedy Setaria species-group 5.3.1.2.1 Genetic diversity in the weedy foxtails 5.3.1.2.2 Genetic pattern of colonization and regional differentiation 5.3.1.2.3 Genetic variation and evolutionary success of colonizers. 5.3.2 Species associations for colonization 5.3.2.1 The origin of weeds: Wild-crop-weed plant complexes 5.3.2.2 Preadaptive colonizing archetypes 5.3.2.2.1 Generalist-specialist genotypes 5.3.2.2.2 Reproductive colonizing types 5.3.2.3 Genotype structuring: colonizing species associations 5.3.2.3.1 Species-groups 5.3.2.3.2 Polyploid species clusters 5.3.2.3.3 Aggregate species 5.4 Exploiting opportunity: weed community dynamics 5.4.1 Phenotypic life history traits 5.4.1.1 Introduction 5.4.1.2 Plant morphology, development and activity during life history 5.4.1.3 Preadaptation 5.4.1.4 Trait basis of the invasion process 5.4.1.5 Life history trait lists: birth, dispersal, recruitment, vegetative growth, reproductive growth 5.4.2 Ecological roles-guilds-trades in weed-crop plant community assembly and structure 5.4.2.1 Definitions 5.4.2.2 Guild structure and community organization 5.4.2.3 Parameters of weed species ecological role and niche 5.4.2.4 Trait guild: Relative seedling/bud emergence order 5.4.2.5 Other trait guilds 5.4.3 Changes in plant community structure 5.4.3.1 Weed population shifts 5.4.3.1.1 Inter-specific weed population shifts 5 Dekker: The Evolutionary Ecology of Weeds and Invasive Plants 5.4.3.1.2 Intra-specific weed population shifts 5.4.3.1.3 Herbicide-induced population shifts 5.4.3.2 Plant community ecological succession UNIT 4: WEED LIFE HISTORY 123 6 Weed Life History Models 125 6.1 Introduction 6.2 Limitations of demographic models 7 Reproduction, Mortality, Life History Timing and Trade-Offs 127 7.1 Introduction 7.2 Definitions 7.3 Reproduction and mortality 7.4 Timing of reproduction 7.5 Reproductive value 7.6 Risk of death 7.7 Plant age stages 7.8 Trade-offs in reproduction 7.8.1 Principle of strategic allocation 7.8.2 Life history trade-offs 7.8.3 Timing of life history trade-offs 7.8.4 Seed number 7.8.5 Seed age 7.8.5.1 Seed size plasticity and stability in a species 7.8.5.2 Variable seed size 7.8.5.3 Relationship of seed size to habitat 7.8.5.4 Small seed size 7.8.5.5 Relative size of seed produced by weed species 7.8.5.6 Seed weight variation between plant species 7.8.6 Seed size and number variation and trade-offs 7.8.7 Five roles of seed 7.8.7.1 Trade-offs among seed roles 7.8.7.2 Weed examples 8 Reproduction: Flowering, Birth, Embryogenesis and Abscission 141 8.1 Introduction 8.2 Flowering, anthesis and fertilization 8.2.1 Mating systems 8.3 Seed embryogenesis 8.3.1 Induction of dormancy in seeds during embryogenesis 8.3.1.1 Seed dormancy definitions 8.3.1.2 Life history of a seed 8.3.1.3 The evolutionary and ecological basis for seed dormancy and soil seed pools 6 Dekker: The Evolutionary Ecology of Weeds and Invasive Plants 8.3.1.4 Variability and somatic polymorphism in weed seed dormancy 8.3.1.4.1 Definitions 8.3.1.4.2 Evolutionary ecology of seed heteroblasty 8.3.1.4.3 Examples of weed species heteroblasty 8.3.1.5 Observational categories of seed dormancy mechanisms 8.3.1.5.1 Non-dormant 8.3.1.5.2 Vegetative, perinating buds 8.3.1.5.3 Hard seed coats 8.3.1.5.4 Light and nitrate stimulated soil surface germination 8.3.1.5.5 Oxygen and water signal restriction of after-ripening and germination 8.3.1.5.6 Other seed dormancy mechanisms 8.3.1.5.7 Species with more than one dormancy type, interacting mechanisms 8.3.1.6 Beware of the seed dormancy literature 8.3.1.7 Summary of seed dormancy 9 Propagule Dispersal in Space and Time 155 9.1 Introduction 9.1.1 Definition 9.1.2 The evolutionary ecology of dispersal 9.1.3 Seed trade-offs 9.1.4 Cost of dispersal 9.1.5 Space-time dimensions of dispersal 9.2 Dispersal in space 9.2.1 Dispersal and post-dispersal processes 9.2.2 Seed flux at a locality 9.2.3 Modes of seed and propagule dispersal 9.2.3.1 Gravity 9.2.3.2 Wind and air 9.2.3.3 Water 9.2.3.4 Animal, non-human 9.2.3.5 Human 9.2.3.6 Other miscellaneous types 9.2.3.7 Anecdote on dispersal 9.3 Dispersal in time: soil seed and propagule pool formation 9.3.1 Introduction 9.3.2 Seed states and processes in the soil pool 9.3.2.1 Seed states and fates 9.3.2.2 Seed state transition processes 9.3.3 Population dynamics in the soil seed pool 9.3.3.1 Additions to the seed pool 9.3.3.2 Losses from the seed pool 9.3.3.3 Continuity in the seed pool with time 9.3.4 Structure of soil seed pools 9.3.4.1 Spatial distribution in the soil profile 7 Dekker: The Evolutionary Ecology of Weeds and Invasive Plants 9.3.4.2 Floral seed community composition 9.3.4.3 Seed pool size 9.3.4.4 Seed longevity in the soil 10 Seed Germination and Seedling Recruitment 169 10.1 Introduction 10.2 Process of recruitment 10.3 Favorable germination micro-sites 10.4 Patterns of seedling emergence 10.5 The relationship between seed dormancy heteroblasty and seedling recruitment timing 11 Community Interactions: Vegetative growth and development 173 11.1 Introduction 11.2 Spatial and temporal foraging 11.3 Plant density, plant form and community diversity 11.4 Influences of plant density and growth on yield 11.4.1 Density-yield response 11.4.2 Plant to plant variation 11.5 Influences of plant density on mortality 11.6 Influence of plant density on form and reproduction 11.6.1 Plant form and diversity of community 11.6.2 Phenotypic plasticity and somatic polymorphism 11.7 Forces of selection acting on plant community dynamics and competition 11.7.1 Biological categories of selection 11.7.1.1 ‘r’ and ‘K’ selection 11.7.1.2 Selection for ecological combining ability 11.7.1.3 Selection by activity of predators and pathogens 11.7.1.4 The evolutionary consequences of disturbances 11.7.1.5 Selection in a patchy environment 11.7.2 Maximizing fitness in a spatially variable environment 11.7.3 Biodiversity, complexity and community stability [vs.
Recommended publications
  • What Characteristics Do All Invasive Species Share That Make Them So
    Invasive Plants Facts and Figures Definition Invasive Plant: Plants that have, or are likely to spread into native or minimally managed plant systems and cause economic or environmental harm by developing self-sustaining populations and becoming dominant or disruptive to those systems. Where do most invasive species come from? How do they get here and get started? Most originate long distances from the point of introduction Horticulture is responsible for the introduction of approximately 60% of invasive species. Conservation uses are responsible for the introduction of approximately 30% of invasive species. Accidental introductions account for about 10%. Of all non-native species introduced only about 15% ever escape cultivation, and of this 15% only about 1% ever become a problem in the wild. The process that leads to a plant becoming an invasive species, Cultivation – Escape – Naturalization – Invasion, may take over 100 years to complete. What characteristics make invasive species so successful in our environment? Lack predators, pathogens, and diseases to keep population numbers in check Produce copious amounts of seed with a high viability of that seed Use successful dispersal mechanisms – attractive to wildlife Thrive on disturbance, very opportunistic Fast-growing Habitat generalists. They do not have specific or narrow growth requirements. Some demonstrate alleleopathy – produce chemicals that inhibit the growth of other plants nearby. Have longer photosynthetic periods – first to leaf out in the spring and last to drop leaves in autumn Alter soil and habitat conditions where they grow to better suit their own survival and expansion. Why do we care? What is the big deal? Ecological Impacts Impacting/altering natural communities at a startling rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Lasting-Love-At-Last-By-Amari-Ice.Pdf
    Lasting Love at Last The Gay Guide to Attracting the Relationship of Your Dreams By Amari Ice 2 Difference Press McLean, Virginia, USA Copyright © Amari Ice, 2017 Difference Press is a trademark of Becoming Journey, LLC All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the author. Reviewers may quote brief passages in reviews. Published 2017 ISBN: 978-1-68309-218-6 DISCLAIMER No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, mechanical or electronic, including photocopying or recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, or transmitted by email without permission in writing from the author. Neither the author nor the publisher assumes any responsibility for errors, omissions, or contrary interpretations of the subject matter herein. Any perceived slight of any individual or organization is purely unintentional. Brand and product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. Cover Design: Jennifer Stimson Editing: Grace Kerina Author photo courtesy of Donta Hensley (photographer), Jay Lautner (editor) 3 To My Love: Thank you for being unapologetically and unwaveringly you, and for being a captive audience for my insatiably playful antics. #IKeep 4 Table of Contents Foreword 6 A Note About the #Hashtags 8 Introduction – Tardy for the Relationship Party 9 Chapter 1 – #OnceUponATime 16 Chapter 2 – What’s Mercury Got to Do with It? 23 Section 1 – Preparing: The Realm of #RelationshipRetrograde 38 Chapter
    [Show full text]
  • Laurie LAURIE by Stephen King 1 Six Months After His Wife of Forty Years
    Laurie LAURIE By Stephen King 1 Six months after his wife of forty years died, Lloyd Sunderland’s sister drove from Boca Raton to Caymen Key to visit him. She brought with her a dark gray puppy which she said was a Border Collie-Mudi mix. Lloyd had no idea what a Mudi was, and didn’t care. “I don’t want a dog, Beth. A dog is the last thing in the world I want. I can barely take care of myself.” “That’s obvious,” she said, unhooking the puppy’s toy-sized leash. “How much weight have you lost?” “I don’t know.” She appraised him. “I’d say fifteen pounds. Which you could afford to give, but not much more. I’m going to make you a sausage scramble. With toast. You’ve got eggs?” “I don’t want a sausage scramble,” Lloyd said, eyeing the dog. It was sitting on the white shag carpet, and he wondered how long it would be before it left a calling card there. The carpet needed a good vacuum and probably a shampoo, but at least it had never been peed on. The dog was looking at him with its amber eyes. Almost seeming to study him. “Do you or do you not have eggs?” “Yes, but—” 2 “And sausage? No, of course not. You’ve probably been living on frozen waffles and Campbell’s soup. I’ll get some at Publix. But first I’ll inventory your fridge and see what else you need.” She was his older sister by five years, had mostly raised him after their mother died, and as a child he had never been able to stand against her.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Replacement of a Primary Metabolic Pathway Via Multiple Independent Eukaryote-To-Eukaryote Gene Transfers and Selective Retention
    doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01797.x Functional replacement of a primary metabolic pathway via multiple independent eukaryote-to-eukaryote gene transfers and selective retention A. M. NEDELCU, A. J. C. BLAKNEY & K. D. LOGUE Biology Department, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada Keywords: Abstract ammonium transporter; Although lateral gene transfer (LGT) is now recognized as a major force in the glutamate synthase; evolution of prokaryotes, the contribution of LGT to the evolution and glutamine synthetase; diversification of eukaryotes is less understood. Notably, transfers of complete lateral gene transfer; pathways are believed to be less likely between eukaryotes, because the Monosiga; successful transfer of a pathway requires the physical clustering of functionally primary metabolic pathway. related genes. Here, we report that in one of the closest unicellular relatives of animals, the choanoflagellate, Monosiga, three genes whose products work together in the glutamate synthase cycle are of algal origin. The concerted retention of these three independently acquired genes is best explained as the consequence of a series of adaptive replacement events. More generally, this study argues that (i) eukaryote-to-eukaryote transfers of entire metabolic pathways are possible, (ii) adaptive functional replacements of primary pathways can occur, and (iii) functional replacements involving eukaryotic genes are likely to have also contributed to the evolution of eukaryotes. Lastly, these data underscore the potential contribution of algal genes to the evolution of nonphotosynthetic lineages. Palmer, 2008). On the other hand, as functional replace- Introduction ments can be either adaptive or selectively neutral, their Lateral gene transfer (LGT) is currently recognized as a impact on the recipient’s adaptive or long-term evolu- major force in the evolution of prokaryotes (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Macroevolution?
    [Palaeontology, 2020, pp. 1–11] FRONTIERS IN PALAEONTOLOGY WHAT IS MACROEVOLUTION? by MICHAEL HAUTMANN Pal€aontologisches Institut und Museum, Universit€at Zurich,€ Karl-Schmid Strasse 4, 8006 Zurich,€ Switzerland; [email protected] Typescript received 14 June 2019; accepted in revised form 15 October 2019 Abstract: Definitions of macroevolution fall into three cat- intraspecific competition as a mediator between selective egories: (1) evolution of taxa of supraspecific rank; (2) evolu- agents and evolutionary responses. This mediating role of tion on the grand time-scale; and (3) evolution that is guided intraspecific competition occurs in the presence of sexual by sorting of interspecific variation (as opposed to sorting of reproduction and has therefore no analogue at the macroevo- intraspecific variation in microevolution). Here, it is argued lutionary level where species are the evolutionary units. Com- that only definition 3 allows for a consistent separation of petition between species manifests both on the macroevolution and microevolution. Using this definition, spe- microevolutionary and macroevolutionary level, but with dif- ciation has both microevolutionary and macroevolutionary ferent effects. In microevolution, interspecific competition aspects: the process of morphological transformation is spurs evolutionary divergence, whereas it is a potential driver microevolutionary, but the variation among species that it pro- of extinction at the macroevolutionary level. Recasting the Red duces is macroevolutionary, as is the rate at which speciation Queen hypothesis in a macroevolutionary framework suggests occurs. Selective agents may have differential effects on that the effects of interspecific competition result in a positive intraspecific and interspecific variation, with three possible sit- correlation between origination and extinction rates, confirm- uations: effect at one level only, effect at both levels with the ing empirical observations herein referred to as Stanley’s rule.
    [Show full text]
  • Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network
    Syracuse University SURFACE Dissertations - ALL SURFACE May 2016 Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network Laura Osur Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/etd Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Osur, Laura, "Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network" (2016). Dissertations - ALL. 448. https://surface.syr.edu/etd/448 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the SURFACE at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations - ALL by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract When Netflix launched in April 1998, Internet video was in its infancy. Eighteen years later, Netflix has developed into the first truly global Internet TV network. Many books have been written about the five broadcast networks – NBC, CBS, ABC, Fox, and the CW – and many about the major cable networks – HBO, CNN, MTV, Nickelodeon, just to name a few – and this is the fitting time to undertake a detailed analysis of how Netflix, as the preeminent Internet TV networks, has come to be. This book, then, combines historical, industrial, and textual analysis to investigate, contextualize, and historicize Netflix's development as an Internet TV network. The book is split into four chapters. The first explores the ways in which Netflix's development during its early years a DVD-by-mail company – 1998-2007, a period I am calling "Netflix as Rental Company" – lay the foundations for the company's future iterations and successes. During this period, Netflix adapted DVD distribution to the Internet, revolutionizing the way viewers receive, watch, and choose content, and built a brand reputation on consumer-centric innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • S41467-021-25308-W.Pdf
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25308-w OPEN Phylogenomics of a new fungal phylum reveals multiple waves of reductive evolution across Holomycota ✉ ✉ Luis Javier Galindo 1 , Purificación López-García 1, Guifré Torruella1, Sergey Karpov2,3 & David Moreira 1 Compared to multicellular fungi and unicellular yeasts, unicellular fungi with free-living fla- gellated stages (zoospores) remain poorly known and their phylogenetic position is often 1234567890():,; unresolved. Recently, rRNA gene phylogenetic analyses of two atypical parasitic fungi with amoeboid zoospores and long kinetosomes, the sanchytrids Amoeboradix gromovi and San- chytrium tribonematis, showed that they formed a monophyletic group without close affinity with known fungal clades. Here, we sequence single-cell genomes for both species to assess their phylogenetic position and evolution. Phylogenomic analyses using different protein datasets and a comprehensive taxon sampling result in an almost fully-resolved fungal tree, with Chytridiomycota as sister to all other fungi, and sanchytrids forming a well-supported, fast-evolving clade sister to Blastocladiomycota. Comparative genomic analyses across fungi and their allies (Holomycota) reveal an atypically reduced metabolic repertoire for sanchy- trids. We infer three main independent flagellum losses from the distribution of over 60 flagellum-specific proteins across Holomycota. Based on sanchytrids’ phylogenetic position and unique traits, we propose the designation of a novel phylum, Sanchytriomycota. In addition, our results indicate that most of the hyphal morphogenesis gene repertoire of multicellular fungi had already evolved in early holomycotan lineages. 1 Ecologie Systématique Evolution, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, AgroParisTech, Orsay, France. 2 Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. ✉ Petersburg, Russia. 3 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Document Template
    Copyright by Benjamin Joseph Liebeskind 2014 The Dissertation Committee for Benjamin Joseph Liebeskind Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Ion Channels and the Tree of Life Committee: Harold Zakon, Supervisor David Hillis, Co-Supervisor Richard Aldrich Hans Hofmann Mikhail Matz Ion Channels and the Tree of Life by Benjamin Joseph Liebeskind, B.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin December 2014 Dedication For my father, John. Acknowledgements I would first of all like to acknowledge my advisors Harold Zakon and David Hillis for their guidance, support, and, especially, for the excellent example they set as scientists, scholars, thinkers, and teachers. I also thank my committee members, Richard Aldrich, Hans Hofmann, and Mikhail Matz for their advice and support on this dissertation and on my personal development as a scientist. The members of the Zakon and Hillis labs from 2009 – 2014 have been a wonderful source of feedback and support over the years. I would especially like to acknowledge Thomas Keller, Emily-Jane McTavish, April Wright, Alfredo Ghezzi, Kristin Koenig and Ammon Thompson. This dissertation relied largely on computational skills that I did not possess when I began it. Several individuals put aside time to bring me up to speed, but I would most of all like to acknowledge James Derry, who devotes a huge portion of his own time to helping scientists learn about programming. Finally, I thank my family for their care and support.
    [Show full text]
  • Parable of the Weeds Among the Wheat
    SAINT BONAVENTURE CHURCH SIXTEENTH SUNDAY IN ORDINARY TIME | JULY 19, 2020 As Christian stewards, our mission is to proclaim the Gospel of Jesus Christ to all people through word, sacrament, service and community life. Parable of The Weeds Among The Wheat Mt 13:24-30 Page two 16th Sunday in Ordinary Time PPastor’sastor’s CCornerorner Dear Brothers and Sisters in Christ, Last Sunday, I talked about the use of parables in the Gospel according to Matthew. This Sunday we have several more parables. (See Matthew 13:24-43) Remember, a parable is a story that is used to get a point across. There is usually a line in the parable that makes a person say, “Wait a minute. What did you say? That doesn’t make sense.” And that is when the storyteller says, “Yes! Got your attention.” Last week Jesus told the Parable of the Sower and the Seed. Jesus said some of the seed fell on the path, or on bramble, or on good soil. The listeners would have thought, “Why did the sower waste good seed on a foot path and brambles? (Got your attention!) Today’s Gospel parable is “The Wheat and the Weeds”: The Kingdom of God may be likened to a man who sowed good seed in his field. (So far so good.) While everyone was asleep his enemy sowed weeds all through the wheat. (This is where the “Wait a minute. What did you say?” moment comes. And Jesus has their attention.) The farmhands want to pull out the weeds. The problem is the wheat and the weeds (darnel) look similar in their early stage of growth.
    [Show full text]
  • A Flagellate-To-Amoeboid Switch in the Closest Living Relatives of Animals
    RESEARCH ARTICLE A flagellate-to-amoeboid switch in the closest living relatives of animals Thibaut Brunet1,2*, Marvin Albert3, William Roman4, Maxwell C Coyle1,2, Danielle C Spitzer2, Nicole King1,2* 1Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, United States; 2Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States; 3Department of Molecular Life Sciences, University of Zu¨ rich, Zurich, Switzerland; 4Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Pompeu Fabra University (UPF), CIBERNED, Barcelona, Spain Abstract Amoeboid cell types are fundamental to animal biology and broadly distributed across animal diversity, but their evolutionary origin is unclear. The closest living relatives of animals, the choanoflagellates, display a polarized cell architecture (with an apical flagellum encircled by microvilli) that resembles that of epithelial cells and suggests homology, but this architecture differs strikingly from the deformable phenotype of animal amoeboid cells, which instead evoke more distantly related eukaryotes, such as diverse amoebae. Here, we show that choanoflagellates subjected to confinement become amoeboid by retracting their flagella and activating myosin- based motility. This switch allows escape from confinement and is conserved across choanoflagellate diversity. The conservation of the amoeboid cell phenotype across animals and choanoflagellates, together with the conserved role of myosin, is consistent with homology of amoeboid motility in both lineages. We hypothesize that
    [Show full text]
  • Weed Control Guide for Ohio, Indiana and Illinois
    Pub# WS16 / Bulletin 789 / IL15 OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION Tables Table 1. Weed Response to “Burndown” Herbicides .............................................................................................19 Table 2. Application Intervals for Early Preplant Herbicides ............................................................................... 20 Table 3. Weed Response to Preplant/Preemergence Herbicides in Corn—Grasses ....................................30 WEED Table 4. Weed Response to Preplant/Preemergence Herbicides in Corn—Broadleaf Weeds ....................31 Table 5. Weed Response to Postemergence Herbicides in Corn—Grasses ...................................................32 Table 6. Weed Response to Postemergence Herbicides in Corn—Broadleaf Weeds ..................................33 2015 CONTROL Table 7. Grazing and Forage (Silage, Hay, etc.) Intervals for Herbicide-Treated Corn ................................. 66 OHIO, INDIANA Table 8. Rainfast Intervals, Spray Additives, and Maximum Crop Size for Postemergence Corn Herbicides .........................................................................................................................................................68 AND ILLINOIS Table 9. Herbicides Labeled for Use on Field Corn, Seed Corn, Popcorn, and Sweet Corn ..................... 69 GUIDE Table 10. Herbicide and Soil Insecticide Use Precautions ......................................................................................71 Table 11. Weed Response to Herbicides in Popcorn and Sweet Corn—Grasses
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 9 Page 1 of 40 02/25/2020 Ord. 865
    CHAPTER 9 ORDERLY CONDUCT, PUBLIC NUISANCE, HEALTH AND SANITATION 9.01 Intent and Purpose 9.02 Public Nuisance Defined 9.03 Health Department 9.04 Abatement of Health Nuisances 9.05 Rules and Regulations 9.06 Communicable Diseases 9.07 Public Nuisances Affecting Health and Welfare (1) Adulterated and Unsafe Food (2) Unburied Carcasses (3) Breeding Places for Vermin, etc. (4) Water Pollution (5) Noxious Odors, etc. (6) Street Pollution (7) Air Pollution (8) Surface Waters Prohibited in the Sewage Disposal System (9) Noise Pollution, Regulation of Excessive Noise, Loud and Unnecessary Noise Prohibited (10) Offensive Industries (11) Property Maintenance, Vehicle Parking, Storage and Non Abandonment Code (12) Recycling, Compost, Garbage and Rubbish Removal Standards 9.08 Public Nuisances Offending Morals and Decency (1) Obscene Materials, Devices or Performances (2) Prostitution Prohibited (3) Disorderly Houses Prohibited (4) Gambling, Lotteries, Fraudulent Devices and Practices Prohibited (5) Alcohol and Drug Restrictions (6) Prohibition Against Possession Of Marijuana (7) Prohibition of the Sale, Possession, Manufacture, Delivery And Advertisement of Drug Paraphernalia 9.09 Public Nuisances Affecting Peace and Safety (1) Discharging and Carrying Firearms and Guns; Prohibitions (2) Throwing or Shooting of Arrows, Stones and Other Missiles Prohibited (3) Disorderly Conduct Prohibited (4) Alarm System Requirements and False Alarms Prohibited (5) Obedience to Officers (6) Destruction of Property Prohibited (7) Regulations Regarding School Property (8) Truancy Prohibited (9) Loitering Prohibited (10) Loitering of Minors (11) Civil Trespass (12) Theft or Retaining Possession of Library Materials Chapter 9 Page 1 of 40 02/25/2020 Ord. 865 (13) Illegal Buildings (14) Dangerous Trees and Tree Limbs (15) Regulation of Fireworks (16) Animals or Fowl (17) Obstruction of Streets, Sidewalks, and Public Spaces (18) Distribution of Handbills Prohibited (19) Open Cisterns, Wells, Basements Or Other Dangerous Excavations Prohibited.
    [Show full text]