DOCSLIB.ORG

Innovations in Undergraduate Research and Honors Education Proceedings of the Second Schreyer National Conference

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Innovations in Undergraduate Research and Honors Education Proceedings of the Second Schreyer National Conference University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln NCHC Monographs Series National Collegiate Honors Council 2004 Innovations in Undergraduate Research and Honors Education Proceedings of the Second Schreyer National Conference Josephine M. Cambia Schreyer Honors College Renata S. Engel Schreyer Institute for Teaching Excellence Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nchcmono Part of the Higher Education Administration Commons Cambia, Josephine M. and Engel, Renata S., "Innovations in Undergraduate Research and Honors Education Proceedings of the Second Schreyer National Conference" (2004). NCHC Monographs Series. 12. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nchcmono/12 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the National Collegiate Honors Council at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in NCHC Monographs Series by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Innovations in Undergraduate Research and Honors Education Proceedings of the Second Schreyer National Conference The Pennsylvania State University University Park, Pennsylvania March 30 - April 1, 2001 National Collegiate ~ Honors Council •: ••) YOUR LINK TO UNDERGRADUATE HONORS EDUCATION A Publication ofthe National Collegiate Honors Council Innovations in Undergraduate Research and Honors Education Proceedings of the Second Schreyer National Conference The Pennsylvania State University University Park, Pennsylvania March 30 - April 1, 2001 Editors Josephine M. Cambia, Schreyer Honors College Renata S. Engel, Schreyer Institute for Teaching Excellence ©Copyright 2004 the National Collegiate Honors Council Table of Contents Preface 1 I. Making the Case for Undergraduate Research 2 Introduction: Unpacking the Research Encyclopedia 3 Josephine Carubia, Renata Engel How (Or Whether?) To Integrate Research into Classroom Teaching for All 11 Students and All Higher Education Institutions Alan Jenkins Why Involve Students in Research? 24 Rodney A. Erickson II. Curriculum Models that Include Undergraduate Research 30 The Maryland Gemstone Program 31 William W. Destler Creating an Undergraduate Culture of Science by Integrating Inquiry, Project- 36 based Learning and Research into the Curriculum RichardA. Niesenbaum THE INSIDERS: Undergraduates Critically Examine the Pros and Cons of a 42 Team-based Marine Research Program Traci J. Heincelman, EdwardJ. Majzlik, Christie A. Robinson, Lindsey J. Wise MASS Program at Penn State 48 Serge Tabachnikov Issue Reaction: Honors Theses in the Creative and Performing Arts 51 Joanne Rutkowski III. Course Models that Include Undergraduate Research 53 Multi-disciplinary Study, Responsible Policy-making and Problem-based 54 Learning in Honors Courses Michael Edwards Honors Collaborations: The Presidency in Speech and Composition 59 Sandy Feinstein, JeffKurtz Leaving Home with IT: Using Information Technology to Create Cross-national 63 Design Teams Richard Devon, Pierre Buvat Ancient Myths in a Modern World: A Multi-media Approach to Honors 70 Education and Undergraduate Research RichardErnest Walker Honors Colloquium: Berlin in the 1940s 74 Charles F. Pennacchio IV. Undergraduate Research via Service Learning and Outreach 78 Patterns of Engagement in Service Leadership: First Year to Senior Year 79 Josephine Carubia, Sara Faber, Soma Kedia, Nicole Sandretto, Adam Tarosky, JoAnn C. Vender Community Action Research: A Three-part Service-learning Course Model 90 JoAnn C. Vender Issue Reaction: Integrating Service Learning into Academic Courses 99 M A. Dupont-Morales Issue Reaction: Introducing Students to Social Inquiry Research 101 Alfred G. Mueller II Enriching the Academic Community through a Semester-long Honors 103 Symposium Earl Brown, Jr., Margaret C. Brown V. Learning Strategies that Support Undergraduate Research 107 Promise, Peril, and Potential: Developing, Implementing, and Assessing 109 Problem-based Learning at the Undergraduate Level Carol F. Whitfield Meeting the Boyer Challenge: A Model for Team-based, Student-directed 115 Ul}dergraduate Research Douglas F. Williams, Peter Sederberg, Stejka Eddins A Historical Perspective on Interdisciplinarity and Undergraduate Research in 121 Honors Education Julianna Chaszar Issue Reaction: Inquiry-based Learning in the College Classroom 127 Jill L. Lane, Joanne M Cawley The Role of Libraries in Honors Thesis Research: A Lib-rary Credit Course as a 130 Model for Thesis Research Support Carol A. Wright VI. The Next Challenges 135 Diversity Issues & Honors Education 136 Anthony A. Pittman What's Missing in Honors Education: A Theory-driven Approach 141 Cheryl L. Achterberg The Schreyer National Conference Proceedings: Innovations in Undergraduate Research and Honors Education Preface I recall the excitement ofmy undergraduate experiences with research even though it was twenty years ago and the advances that have been made since then dwarf the contributions I stated in my now yellowed thesis. At that time in my life, research was the way to apply the engineering and science topics I was studying in my courses, to do something purposeful and of interest to others, and to be part of a team-responsible for my research while recognizing its place in the bigger picture. The research connected me to my profession in a way that courses did not. Now as I lead my own research projects, I try to engage as many undergraduates as I can. I know the value of framing a hypothesis, creating an approach to test it, discovering its validity and limitations, and reporting the results in appropriate forums. I want more students to experience what I experienced, to be thrilled by their discoveries, to be challenged by the complexities and intricacies of the research topic, to be buoyed up by the steps forward, and to be able to pose the next questions after each stage so as to advance the research. When Cheryl Achterberg, Dean of the Schreyer Honors College at Penn State, and I began planning the conference that led to this collection of papers, we found that our interests and motives were quite similar around the topic of undergraduate research; thus, we chose it as the conference theme. The conference included keynote papers, short presentations, and thematic roundtable discussions. This compilation ofpapers reflects all ofthese forms ofpresentation and discourse. In the chapters that follow, you will see that they are organized by topic. The first section "Making the Case for Undergraduate Research" includes three papers that set the stage for the remaining sections. The papers provide examples of undergraduate research experiences and justification for embracing research as an extremely valuable active learning experience for undergraduate students. The next four chapters deal with specific topic areas: Curriculum Models that Include Undergraduate Research, Course Models that Include Undergraduate Research, Undergraduate Research via Service Learning and Outreach, and Learning Strategies that Support Undergraduate Research. The papers in these chapters vary in length-some are full-length papers, while others are 'reaction papers' that resulted from the roundtable discussions that took place at the conference. Overall, this collection is rich with ideas and models that I hope will be helpful to you as you explore ways to include or expand the undergraduate research opportunities at your university or college. The proceedings close with the section "The Next Challenges," which includes two papers that place challenges before us to consider as we create programs and opportunities to engage undergraduate students in research. Renata S. Engel Director, Schreyer Institute for Innovation in Learning I. Making the Case for Undergraduate Research In this section Josephine Carubia and Renata Engel introduce the topic of undergraduate research by focusing on the current definitions of scholarship. They place those definitions in the context of specific disciplines and research opportunities. Next, two distinguished educators engage scholarship and also reflect upon the reasoning and purposes that support the practice of undergraduate research. Alan Jenkins probes data on the impacts of undergraduate research in an attempt to answer the most preliminary and crucial questions of whether educators should support this experience, and if so, why and how. He starts out a skeptic and slowly persuades himself, along with his readers, of the value of undergraduate research. Rodney Erickson, by contrast, begins on a positive note and builds evidence thoughtfully on the beneficial outcomes of undergraduate research on students, faculty, and the university. Erickson draws upon many years of experience to offer evidence of how undergraduate research motivates students, guides them in finding relevance, and helps them develop strategies and relationships that lead to deeper and deeper understandings. Together, these three papers establish a frame and a context for the more specific studies, case histories, and narratives that follow. 2 INTRODUCTION: UNPACKING THE RESEARCH ENCYCLOPEDIA JOSEPHINE M. CARUBIA, RENATA S. ENGEL THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOLARSHIP - THE FOUNDATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION Ernest Boyer's work is the touchstone for most contemporary discussions about research and scholarship and is as pertinent to undergraduate research as to the professional research of faculty. This introduction will begin with Boyer so that his definitions and philosophies may inform
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Branstetter, Jennifer Sent
    Branstetter, Jennifer ·From: Ammerman, Paula~ Sent: Wednesday, Janua~ Subject: JVP statement/attorney-client privilege Importance: High Rod Erickson asked that I distribute the below message to you. g To Board Members: r Below is a message I'm planning to send outto the Penn State community on Friday morning. Please let me know.o if you have any reservations· about this message or any edits to offer. Lanny has edited this statement from an earlier version. Please send any comments to Paula by noon tomorrow (Thursday). d Thanks, n Rod u ef This week has been filled with both mourning and celebration of the contributionsn of Joseph Vincent Paterno. I first want to offer my sincere condolences to his wife Sue, his children andi their families. While we knew the public educator, football coach and philanthropist, his family knew himh intimately as husband, father and . grandfather. During an interview a few years back, he was asked whats was his secret ambition. His reply, "To Je a good father and grandfather." I ask all members ofthe Penn State community to respect the family's privacy as they mourn the loss of their loved one, and continuen to support the Paternos with your thoughts and prayers. u Much has been written through the decades about Joes Paterno's life and his iconic coaching career. He will always be remembered for his "Grand Experiment"e of combining academic excellence with championship­ caliber athletic.performance. This approach sett a new standard for all intercollegiate programs around the · nation, and became known as the Penn Statea way-- "Success with Honor." The stellar graduation rate of Joe's players and all Penn State student-athletesst can be traced to his emphasis on scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Program Review Determination November 3, 2016
    Prepared for: Pennsylvania State University OPE ID: 00332900 PRCN: 201210327991 Prepared by: U.S. Department of Education Federal Student Aid Clery Act Compliance Team Final Program Review Determination November 3, 2016 www.FederalStudentAid.ed.gov Pennsylvania State University Campus Crime Final Program Review Determination- Page #1 Table of Contents A. The Clery Act and the Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act .................................... 2 B. Institutional Information ...................................................................................................... 4 C. Background and Scope of Review ........................................................................................ 5 D. Findings and Final Determinations ................................................................................... 16 Finding #1: Clery Act Violations Related to the Sandusky Matter ......................................... 16 Finding #2: Lack of Administrative Capability ....................................................................... 38 Finding #3: Omitted and/or Inadequate ASR and AFSR Policy Statements ........................... 45 Finding #4: Failure to Issue Timely Warnings in Accordance with Federal Regulations ....... 61 Finding #5: Failure to Properly Classify Reported Incidents and Disclose Crime Statistics .. 77 Finding #6: Failure to Establish an Adequate System for Collecting Crime Statistics from All Required Sources ................................................................................ 108 Finding
    [Show full text]
  • Library Official Takes Issue with Funding Formula
    11/20/12 ● Publisher: NewsLanc.com, LLC ● Volume II, No. 184 Library official takes issue with funding formula INTELLIGENCER JOURNAL NEW ERA: The EDITOR: The article merits a careful reading. funding formula for local libraries isn’t fair, a top city library official says. As we have previously pointed out, either there should be a System that owns and operates the The Lancaster Public Library on Duke Street and its library or there should be libraries that simply branches in Leola and Mountville cover 40 percent contract for services with a much scaled back of the county’s service area but receive only 29 System. Right now we have the worst of both worlds percent of state allocations, city library board with the ridiculousness of each library, tiny or president Todd Smith said… gigantic, only having one vote in decision making. Further, Smith said, far too much money is spent at When Lancaster Public Library (LPL) president the system level, never making it to the county’s Scott Todd told the System board that LPL is at a member libraries. For instance, Smith said, only 8 “breaking point”, this might foreshadow an LPL exit percent of the $2.1 million allocated by the county and the death knell of the bloated System. RIP. for library services goes to the libraries; the rest, he said, is spent at the system level… One Year Later, Alumni Watchdog Group Raises More Questions Penn Staters for Responsible Stewardship intense judicial scrutiny for allowing a suspected continues to pressure board of trustees pedophile to remain in contact with children? on need for objective investigation, immediate resignations and transparent leadership 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University Schreyer Honors College
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATIONS ARTS & SCIENCES COMMUNICATION IN A SCANDAL: A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF CRISIS COMMUNICATION AT PENN STATE MEGHAN S. CAMPBELL Spring 2013 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degrees in Communications Arts & Sciences and Media Studies with honors in Communication Arts & Sciences Reviewed and approved* by the following: Amber Walker Jackson Lecturer Thesis Supervisor Lori Bedell Senior Lecturer Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. i ABSTRACT Scandals and crises are not situations any organization wants to find itself in, yet it is imperative for those in charge to know how to effectively deal with controversy and steer the organization back to solid ground should they find themselves in the midst of one. This study examines the specific case of the Jerry Sandusky Child Abuse Sex Scandal that rocked the Penn State community and tarnished its once spotless reputation forever. The decisions made in the first month following the break of the scandal by top administrators and the Board of Trustees in regards to communication efforts to its faculty, students, and surrounding community are documented and then examined. Crisis communication management literature was consulted in the analysis of the administration’s communications decisions, as well as community input. Decisions that were appropriate, timely, and effective are noted and discussed. Also, decisions that were ill-advised, counterproductive and, in some cases, detrimental are also highlighted and studied at length. Suggestions for future improvements are included. Keywords: Jerry Sandusky, Penn State University, child sexual abuse, crisis management ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NRC Request for Additional Information to Penn State Letter of September 23, 2013 for a Change in Senior Management Representati
    .PENNSTATE (814) 863-3939 I Fax: (814) 865-7225 Radiation Protection Office Environmental Health and Safety 20 I Academic Projects Building The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA 16802 • http://\vww.ehs.psu.edu October 8, 2013 Director, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland 20852 - 2738 Re: License Number SNM-95 (Docket Number 070-0113) Subj: NRC request for additional infonnation to Penn State letter of September 23, 2013 for a change in senior management representative As requested by the NRC project manager during a phone conversation of October 4, 2013, this letter transmits the requested additional information concerning Penn State's letter of September 23, 2013 announcing the change in senior management representation for the referenced license. The requested information is I) an organizational chart showing the position of the senior management representative and 2) the curriculum vitae (CV) of the senior management representative. Attachment I contains the Penn State organization chart applicable to the referenced license. Attachment 2 contains the CV of Dr. Neil Sharkey, Vice President for Research and senior management representative for the referenced license. Thank you for your prompt attention to this request. Please contact me for correspondence or if you need any additional information. Jeffrey Leavey, CHP Radiation Safety Officer 20 I Academic Projects Building Penn State University University Park,
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Senior Vice President for Finance and Business/Treasurer the Pennsylvania State University
    Senior Vice President for Finance and Business/Treasurer The Pennsylvania State University (Penn State) invites nominations and applications for the position of Senior Vice President for Finance and Business/Treasurer. Penn State University: Overview Founded in 1855, Penn State is one of the premier research universities in the world and a driver of economic growth and prosperity for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Headed by Penn State’s 18th President, Eric J. Barron, and its Executive Vice President and Provost, Nicholas P. Jones, the University embraces its tripartite mission of teaching, research, and service across an ever-evolving higher education landscape. With 24 campuses throughout Pennsylvania, Penn State is the Commonwealth’s only land-grant institution. The University represents a strong economic powerhouse in the state, contributing more than $11.6 billion to the state’s economy and supporting—both directly and indirectly—more than 105,000 jobs across Pennsylvania. Penn State’s a national leader in research and development, with $968 million in expenditures in 2018-19, contributing to the state’s economy through innovation and technology transfer. Granted the “very high activity” classification for research universities by the Carnegie Foundation, Penn State prepares students to be leaders with a global perspective. With more than 6,400 full- time faculty and more than 160 baccalaureate degree programs and 190 graduate programs, Penn State is a comprehensive academic institution with a $6.5 billion annual operating budget. Penn State enrolls nearly 100,000 students and has 24 campus locations and 19 academic colleges, employs approximately 32,500 faculty and staff, and includes a medical college, two law schools, and an online World Campus, which graduated its first students in 2000 and now enrolls more than 12,000 scholars.
    [Show full text]
  • Penn State Football: an Analysis of Crisis Communication Best Practices and How PSU Overcame the Ultimate PR Crisis
    Syracuse University SURFACE Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Projects Projects Winter 12-15-2014 Penn State Football: An Analysis of Crisis Communication Best Practices and How PSU Overcame the Ultimate PR Crisis Meaghan Grace Lane Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/honors_capstone Part of the Advertising and Promotion Management Commons Recommended Citation Lane, Meaghan Grace, "Penn State Football: An Analysis of Crisis Communication Best Practices and How PSU Overcame the Ultimate PR Crisis" (2014). Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Projects. 903. https://surface.syr.edu/honors_capstone/903 This Honors Capstone Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Projects at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Syracuse University Honors Program Capstone Projects by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Penn State Football: An Analysis of Crisis Communication Best Practices and How PSU Overcame the Ultimate PR Crisis A Capstone Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Renée Crown University Honors Program at Syracuse University Meaghan Grace Lane Candidate for Bachelor of Science Degree and Renée Crown University Honors December 2014 Honors Capstone Project in Public Relations Capstone Project Advisor: _______________________ Dennis F. Kinsey, Ph.D Capstone Project Reader: _______________________ Patrick T. Ryan, B.S. Honors Director: _______________________ Stephen Kuusisto, Director Date: December 3, 2014 1 Abstract This thesis paper is an analysis of the crisis communication response to the 2011 Pennsylvania State University child sex abuse scandal. The reputation of this iconic university and its football program was changed forever by this horrific event, which involved years of administrative cover-ups of the sexual assault of children by an assistant football coach.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Alt THESIS Final.Pdf
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATION ARTS AND SCIENCES THE RHETORICAL SITUATION AND PENN STATE: APOLOGIES, EMOTIONS, AND THE CALL FOR UNITY REBECCA ANNE ALT SPRING 2013 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in Communication Arts and Sciences with honors in Communication Arts and Sciences Reviewed and approved* by the following: Jeremy Engels Associate Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences Thesis Supervisor Lori Bedell Senior Lecturer in Communication Arts and Sciences Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. i ABSTRACT This thesis serves to critically examine the Rhetorical Situation at The Pennsylvania State University in the wake of what has been named “The Jerry Sandusky Scandal.” Specifically, the functions of this project are, (1) to dissect, identify, and explain the unique parts of the Rhetorical Situation (exigence, audience, and constraints) at Penn State in the initial two weeks after the news broke nationally (Nov 5-20), (2) examine and criticize the many texts from several particular audiences that make up the “Fitting Response” part of the rhetorical situation, and (3) apply several rhetorical constructs derived from existing literature and theory to the situation as to better understand the specific chain of events and their rhetorical significance. This essay utilizes ancient and contemporary rhetorical theory to provide a thorough rhetorical criticism of the textual evidence provided by the audiences of Penn State Administrators, Penn State students, and Penn State faculty, specifically the Academic College Deans. While the focus of the criticism is on a short-two week timeline of events and texts, that specific period of time serves as a microcosm to understanding the rhetorical action at Penn State as a whole in the aftermath of shock and disaster.
    [Show full text]
  • P:\Minutes\January 2010\January2010minutesbot.Wpd
    248 - 1 MINUTES OF MEETING BOARD OF TRUSTEES VOLUME 248 January 22, 2010 A meeting of the Board of Trustees was held in the Boardroom of The Nittany Lion Inn, University Park, Pennsylvania, at 10:23 a.m. on January 22, 2010. The following Trustees were present: Broadhurst (chairman), Garban (vice chairman), Alexander, Arnelle, Baldwin, Chaiken, Clemens, Eckel, Hayes, Henning, Hetherington, Hintz, Huber, Hughes, Jones, Joyner, Junker, Lubert, Masser, Myers, Quigley, Redding, Riley, Shaffer, Spanier, Strumpf, Suhey, and Surma; Trustees Emeriti Huck, Metzgar, Robinson, and Rowell; and Governor<s Representative Lewis. Present by invitation were faculty representatives Coraor, Hannan, and Landa Pytel; student representatives Borsuk-Woodman and Kierans; staff members Ammerman, Bowen, Crouter, DiEugenio, Dolbin, Foley, Horvath, Kirsch, Mahon, Pangborn, Paz, Poole, Romano, Sims, and Weidemann; and Mr. Courtney of McQuaide Blasko. Chairman Broadhurst mentioned the passing of some members of the Penn State family, The Honorable Hardy Williams who served as a board member from 1972 until 1975; Mary Ann Snider, wife of the late Obie Snider who served on the board; and Craig Erickson, son of Provost Rodney Erickson and his wife Shari. A moment of silence was held for those Penn State family members. Chairman Broadhurst welcomed Hank Foley in his new role as Vice President for Research and Dean of the Graduate School. Chairman Broadhurst also welcomed the University Faculty Senate Officers, Lee Coroar, Jean Landa Pytel, and John Hannan; student representatives Nicholas Borsuk-Woodman and Gavin Keirans; and Academic Leadership Chair Ann Crouter. Chairman Broadhurst mentioned that in the future the Board would be welcoming Roger J.
    [Show full text]
  • PSU Text Alert Mistakes Lonely Package For
    PENN STATE’S ONLY EDITED NEWSPAPER The Phroth phroth.com Published satirically by students at Penn State @phroth Vol.Phollegian 122 No. 132 Friday, October 27, 2012 free of charge everywhere PSU Text Alert mistakes lonely package for suspicious BY SPENCER FRANK a mass text was sent out about “But, instead, I received a “It’s about the tenth time in goes to the football stadium to STAFF WRITER | @SPENCEFRANK a “suspicious” package, but frightening message from that the past year that we have been try to make friends. However, State College Police ultimately text alert thing warning me to summoned to investigate a anytime it gets close to anyone, Students and faculty subscribed deemed it lonely. PSU Text Alert stay away from North Nittany suspicious package,” explained it’s mistaken for an explosive. to the PSU Text Alert service were ignored its unnecessary whistle Parking Deck or whatever. The Detective Dan Wiley. “Turns Penn State Course Watch once again misinformed about a blowing and deemed the area so-called “bomb” was just a out, it is the same lonely package List has also been under fire package left in a random parking “safe” with another useless mass package left behind and that girl every time. It’s actually really for sending out mass texts to deck somewhere on campus. text message. never texted me back. I’m never sad.” students saying that there are The free service offered by Penn “I was waiting for a text from going to get laid.” Sources tell us that the lonely seats available in high demand State warns about potentially this girl that I just met over the State College Police weighed package was abandoned by a classes.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania Jake
    Received 12/12/2014 Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania Filed 12/12/2014 Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania 1 MD 2013 IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA JAKE CORMAN, in his official capacity as Senator from the 34th Senatorial District of Pennsylvania and Chair of the Senate Committee on Appropriations; and ROBERT M. McCORD, in his official capacity as Treasurer of the No. 1 MD 2013 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Plaintiffs, v. THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, Defendant, v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, Defendant. JOINT PRE-TRIAL STATEMENT Pursuant to this Court’s October 9, 2014 Scheduling Order, the parties, through counsel, hereby submit this Joint Pretrial Statement.1 The lettered sections correspond to the format identified in paragraph four of the Court’s October 9 Order. A. CAPTION OF THE CASE Jake Corman, in his official capacity as Senator from the 34th Senatorial District of Pennsylvania and Chair of the Senate Committee on Appropriations; and Robert M. McCord, in his official capacity as Treasurer of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. The National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Pennsylvania State University, Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, No. 1 MD 2013. B. DESIGNATED TRIAL COUNSEL FOR EACH PARTY 1. Plaintiffs Senator Jake Corman: a. Matthew H. Haverstick, Conrad O’Brien PC b. Mark E. Seiberling, Conrad O’Brien PC 2. Plaintiff Treasurer Rob McCord: a. Christopher Craig, Chief Counsel, Pennsylvania Treasury 3. Defendant The National Collegiate Athletic Association (“NCAA”): a. Everett C. Johnson, Latham & Watkins LLP 1 Discovery remains ongoing in this case. The Parties therefore reserve the right to supplement or modify this pretrial statement as necessary and appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipality Predir Streetname Streettype Postdir Postalcomm
    Municipality PreDir StreetName StreetType PostDir PostalComm STATE COLLEGE 101 N ATHERTON STREET BLDG STATE COLLEGE PENN TWP 10TH ALY COBURN STATE COLLEGE 116 W COLLEGE AVENUE BLDG STATE COLLEGE PENN TWP 11TH ALY COBURN STATE COLLEGE 1606 NORMA STREET BLDG STATE COLLEGE SPRING TWP 1ST AVE BELLEFONTE CENTRE HALL 1ST ST CENTRE HALL PENN TWP 1ST ALY COBURN BOGGS TWP 1ST AVE MILESBURG MILES TWP N 1ST ALY REBERSBURG MILES TWP S 1ST ALY REBERSBURG BURNSIDE TWP 1ST FORK YOST RUN TRL CLARENCE STATE COLLEGE 224 SOUTH ALLEN STREET BLDG UNIVERSITY PARK CENTRE HALL 2ND ST CENTRE HALL PENN TWP 2ND ST COBURN BOGGS TWP 2ND AVE MILESBURG MILLHEIM 2ND ST MILLHEIM MILES TWP 2ND ALY REBERSBURG PATTON TWP 2ND AVE STATE COLLEGE CTBEECH CREEK TWP 2ND FORK YOST RUN TRL CLARENCE BURNSIDE TWP 2ND FORK YOST RUN TRL CLARENCE FERGUSON TWP 300 SCIENCE PARK ROAD BLDG UNIVERSITY PARK FERGUSON TWP 3058 RESEARCH DRIVE BLDG UNIVERSITY PARK COLLEGE TWP 322 EB MNE ON RAMP BOALSBURG RD RAMP BOALSBURG COLLEGE TWP 322 EB MNE ON RAMP COLLEGE AVE RAMP BOALSBURG POTTER TWP 322 EB MNE ON RAMP W SAND MOUNTAIN RD RAMP SPRING MILLS POTTER TWP 322 EB ON GENERAL POTTER/POTTERS MILLS RAMP SPRING MILLS WORTH TWP 322 EB ON PORT MATILDA HWY/E MOUNTAIN RD RAMP PORT MATILDA COLLEGE TWP 322 WB MNE ON RAMP BOALSBURG RD RAMP BOALSBURG COLLEGE TWP 322 WB MNE ON RAMP COLLEGE AVE RAMP BOALSBURG HARRIS TWP 322 WB MNE ON RAMP OLD FORT RAMP BOALSBURG POTTER TWP 322 WB MNE ON RAMP SAND MOUNTAIN RD RAMP SPRING MILLS POTTER TWP 322 WB ON GENERAL POTTER/POTTERS MILLS RAMP SPRING MILLS CENTRE HALL 3RD
    [Show full text]