DOCSLIB.ORG

Economic Aspects of Polluted Soil Bioremediation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Economic Aspects of Polluted Soil Bioremediation © 2002 WIT Press, Ashurst Lodge, Southampton, SO40 7AA, UK. All rights reserved. Web: www.witpress.com Email [email protected] Paper from: Brownfield Sites, CA Brebbia, D Almorza & H Klapperich (Editors). ISBN 1-85312-918-6 Economic aspects of polluted soil bioremediation J. Troquetl &M. Troquet2 lBiobasic Environnement, Pollution control through biotechnology, France 21nstitut des Sciences de 1!lng&ieur de 1‘Universit4 Blaise Pascal, France Abstract Industrialisation in developed country has left many type of pollution during the last 150 years, The end of pollutants course is generally soil and groundwater. In the main part of west countries, authorities must list the contaminated sites and have to consider their clean-up. In the same time, the use of biotechnology for the removal of organic pollution from soil and groundwater is in progress and offer new possibilities of cost savings, The main characteristics of bioremediation processes are their capacity to be implemented in-situ, that is to say to avoid great civil engineering works. Nevertheless before to choose this innovative technology, it is necessary to define the best treatment strategy, which is in close relation with local conditions. In this paper we will investigate some specific cases for which it is possible to implement an effective bioremediation process. In addition, the main process variables will be identified in order to keep the competitive price of this biotechnological approach. In this way, it will be emphasised particularly about the whole knowledge of the quality and quantity of the pollutants to be treated and both physical and biological factors active on the bioprocess in the first stage, Secondly, pilot lab experiment will be conducted to identify the different parameters of oxidizer and nutriments supplementation and micro-organisms growth kinetics, This strategy appears surprising, because the real evaluation of bioremediation cost cannot be established without the two steps described above, and this fust operation could represent 5 to 15 0/0 of the global cost of rehabilitation, © 2002 WIT Press, Ashurst Lodge, Southampton, SO40 7AA, UK. All rights reserved. Web: www.witpress.com Email [email protected] Paper from: Brownfield Sites, CA Brebbia, D Almorza & H Klapperich (Editors). ISBN 1-85312-918-6 268 Browttfield Sites: Assessment, Rehabilitation and De~elopntent 1 Introduction With the economic and industrial development, all countries in the world faces an enormous task in cleanup hazardous waste, If we promote today clean technologies for industries, it is also necessary to rehabilitate old industrial sites, particularly in urban zone, and remediate rapidly after ecological disasters. Soil, groundwater and marine coast are often subject to contamination by various organic and mineral pollutants from a wide variety of sources. Organic pollutants, like crude oil, are one of the most important pollutant in marine environment with the mediated oil spills like the Exxon Valdez and Sea Empress in the United-States and other Amoco Cadiz or Erika in France. It has been estimated that worldwide somewhere between 1,7 to 8,8 x 106 tons of hydrocarbons impact marine waters and coasts each year [1], Around the coast of the UK alone, between the years of 1986 to 1996, 6,845 oil spills were reported [2]. In France 281 pollution reports in 2000 and 347 in 2001 were notified with respectively only 83 and 62 pollution sources identified [3]. This data show the difficulties to really quantify the marine pollution. For soil and groundwater, the problem is the same but for other reason, especially because the pollution is quite very diffise and no visible. In different countries, the regulation organisation, national administration or industries try to draw up inventories of polluted site through historical studies. Among those, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and US Air Force in United-States, British Gas in United-Kingdom, the French Agency for Environment and Energy Management (ADEME) and the Ministry of Industry in France are the most active and they have promoted various demonstration programmed for testing land remediation, Economic assessment is not only a key factor for decisions in the field of site rehabilitation, but also one of the integrating tools for damage assessment. Indeed, economic cost induced by accidental, chronic or historical spills, belong to two distinct categories: a costs associated with decrease in servicesrendered by the natural active assets; n costs of rehabilitation or replacement of this asset. Treatment methods are divided into those for soil remediation and for surface and groundwater remediation. Further categorization results in the consideration of biological, chemical and physical treatment technologies. Eighteen different methods have been reviewed that pertain to remediation of soils [4]. Bioremediation appears the simplest and cost effective method for large volumes of contaminated soil by toxic chemicals [5, 6], probably because this process naturally occurs in soil and groundwater and can be easily enhanced by different techniques, 2 The market evaluation The pollution amount in soil and groundwater is very extensive, accumulated during 150 years of industrial activities. In United-States, thousands of sites have been identified throughout the country, with an estimated cleanup cost over $1.7 trillion using existing technologies [7]. On the other hand, it has been © 2002 WIT Press, Ashurst Lodge, Southampton, SO40 7AA, UK. All rights reserved. Web: www.witpress.com Email [email protected] Paper from: Brownfield Sites, CA Brebbia, D Almorza & H Klapperich (Editors). ISBN 1-85312-918-6 Browtzfield Sites: Assessment, Rehabilitation and De~’elopntent 269 estimated that the bioremediation component of environmental biotechnology will be some $500 million by the year 2000 [8]. This two values show the difficulty to make an inventory of contaminated sites and to estimate the remediation cost. The US Air Force has estimated that it has 2,000 underground tank sites to clean up [9] by this method. In 1986, conservative estimates indicated that they were approximately 3.5 million Underground Storage Tanks (USTS) in the United- States, of which roughly 200,000 to 400,000 are leaking or showing signs of deterioration. By 1994, the estimate of leaking tanks had grown to over 600,000. The average cost of a non-hazardous UST cleanup is estimated at $70,000 [10]. Other evaluation talk about 6 million USTS, with 1.$20% of them are leaking. The associated cleanup costs are estimated to average about $180,000 per site [11]. Always in United-States, the national market for bioremediation has been estimated to be up to $1 billion. Currently there are over 200 f~s in the US that offer bioremediation services [12]. Nevertheless, many other evaluations exist in different countries. In United-Kingdom, it has been estimated that there are some 100,000 sites which will cost between 210,000 and f20,000 million to cleanup [8], For example, British Gas has a major programme of contaminated land remediation involving approximately the 1,000 former gaswork sites, and up to f200,000 can be saved on each site with bioremediation [13]. In France, 896 contaminated sites have been identified in 1996 by different type of pollution [14] :41 YO are contaminated by petroleum hydrocarbons, 17 YO by lead, 16% by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), 13 % by halogenated organic compounds, 6940by polychlorobiphenyls (PCBS), 6 ?40 by other volatile organic compounds (VOCS) and lastly 5 ‘Aby mercury. The regulated market is annually evaluated at ~45 million [15]. In this last country, the global market is estimated between ~7,500 and ~10,500 million for the next ten years for 200,000 to 300,000 sites potentially contaminated [15]. In Germany, 110,000 polluted sites are really identified among 200,000 suspected sites for a total remediation cost of ~200,000 million, but actually, a greater financial effort is consented with regard of other European countries [15]. 3 Methods of soil treatment Various technologies are currently available to treat contaminated soils by hazardous chemicals, including excavation and containment in secured landfills, vapor extraction, stabilization and solidification, soil flushing, soil washing, solvent extraction, thermal resorption, vitrification and incineration [4,16]. However, many of these technologies are either costly or do not result in complete decontamination of sites and in the actual communication especially devoted to bioremediation, only comparison for treatment costs will be reported. 4 Bioremediation capability Bioremediation technologies can be broadly classified as ex-situ or in-situ. In both cases, micro-organisms are used because they have an extensive capacity to © 2002 WIT Press, Ashurst Lodge, Southampton, SO40 7AA, UK. All rights reserved. Web: www.witpress.com Email [email protected] Paper from: Brownfield Sites, CA Brebbia, D Almorza & H Klapperich (Editors). ISBN 1-85312-918-6 270 Browttfield Sites: Assessment, Rehabilitation and De~elopntent degrade synthetic compounds; therefore, bioremediation can be applied to various sites contaminated with a wide variety of chemical pollutants. The frost bioremediation technologies that have been developed were ex-situ technologies, i.e. biotreatment of excavated soil in contrast to in-situ technologies which aim is the treatment without excavation and often is taking care of both groundwater and soil pollution [17]. The current
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bioaugmentation: an Emerging Strategy of Industrial Wastewater Treatment for Reuse and Discharge
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Review Bioaugmentation: An Emerging Strategy of Industrial Wastewater Treatment for Reuse and Discharge Alexis Nzila 1,*, Shaikh Abdur Razzak 2 and Jesse Zhu 3 1 Department of Life Sciences, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM), P.O. Box 468, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia 2 Department of Chemical Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM), Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia; [email protected] 3 Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +966-13-860-7716; Fax: +966-13-860-4277 Academic Editors: Rao Bhamidiammarri and Kiran Tota-Maharaj Received: 12 May 2016; Accepted: 9 July 2016; Published: 25 August 2016 Abstract: A promising long-term and sustainable solution to the growing scarcity of water worldwide is to recycle and reuse wastewater. In wastewater treatment plants, the biodegradation of contaminants or pollutants by harnessing microorganisms present in activated sludge is one of the most important strategies to remove organic contaminants from wastewater. However, this approach has limitations because many pollutants are not efficiently eliminated. To counterbalance the limitations, bioaugmentation has been developed and consists of adding specific and efficient pollutant-biodegrading microorganisms into a microbial community in an effort to enhance the ability of this microbial community to biodegrade contaminants. This approach has been tested for wastewater cleaning with encouraging results, but failure has also been reported, especially during scale-up. In this review, work on the bioaugmentation in the context of removal of important pollutants from industrial wastewater is summarized, with an emphasis on recalcitrant compounds, and strategies that can be used to improve the efficiency of bioaugmentation are also discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioremediation of Groundwater: an Overview
    International Journal of Applied Engineering Research ISSN 0973-4562 Volume 13, Number 24 (2018) pp. 16825-16832 © Research India Publications. http://www.ripublication.com Bioremediation of Groundwater: An Overview Shivam Mani Tripathi 1, Shri Ram2 1 ,2 Civil Engineering Department, MMMUT Gorakhpur, India Abstract can be treated on site, thus reducing exposure risks for clean- In past, we have large open area and abundant land resources up personnel, or potentially wider exposure as a result of and groundwater. But after the industrialization the use of transportation accidents. Methodology of this process is not hazardous chemicals increased due to unmanageable technically difficult, considerable experience and knowledge conditions. The chemical disposed on the ground surface & may require implementing this process, by thoroughly many other anthropogenic activities by humans like use of investigating the site and to know required condition to pesticides and oil spillage contaminated the soil and achieve. groundwater. The different type of contaminant by percolation The usual technique of remediation is to plow up through the ground reach to the aquifer and get affected which contaminated soil and take away to the site, or to cover or cap causes serious problem. We spend lot of money and use many the contaminated area. There are some drawbacks. The first technologies to extract and remediate the contamination. In method simply transport the contaminated materials which spite of different methods, bioremediation is a technology create major risks is excavation, handling, and transport of which is cost efficient and effective by using natural microbes hazardous material. It is very difficult to find the new landfill and degrades the contaminants the conditions and different sites for disposal.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodegradation and Bioremediation of Organic Pesticides
    Chapter 12 Biodegradation and Bioremediation of Organic Pesticides Jesús Bernardino Velázquez-Fernández, Abril Bernardette Martínez-Rizo, Maricela Ramírez-Sandoval and Delia Domínguez-Ojeda Additional information is available at the end of the chapter http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/46845 1. Introduction Pesticides can be used to control or to manage pest populations at a tolerable level. The suffix “-cide” literally means “kill”, therefore, the term pesticide refers to a chemical substance that kills pests. It is incorrect to assume that the term pesticide refers only to insecticides. Pesticides include many different types of products with different functions or target (Table 1). The pesticide designation is formed by combining the name of the pest (e.g., insect or mite) with the suffix “-cide” (1). Pesticides could be classified according to their toxicity, chemical group, environmental persistence, target organism, or other features. According to the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, 9 of the 12 persistent organic chemicals are pesticides. Classes of organic pesticides (consisting of organic molecules) include organochlorine, organophosphate, organometallic, pyrethroids, and carbamates among others (2, 3). Most pesticides cause adverse effects when reaching organisms. The intensity of the toxic effect varies with time, dose, organism characteristics, environmental presence or pesticide characteristics. Their presence in environment determines the dose and time at which an organism is exposed and could represent a hazard for worldwide life due to their mobility. Hence, the persistence in the environment leads to a risk for life: the more persistent a pesticide is, the worse its environmental impact. Pesticide persistence in environment is caused by either their physico-chemical properties or the lack of organisms able to degrade them.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of the Age of Particulates on the Bioremediation of Crude Oil Polluted Soil
    IOSR Journal of Applied Chemistry (IOSR-JAC) e-ISSN: 2278-5736.Volume 7, Issue 11 Ver. I. (Nov. 2014), PP 24-33 www.iosrjournals.org Impact of the Age of Particulates on the Bioremediation of Crude Oil Polluted Soil 1Onakughotor Ejiro Dennis, 2Aguele Precious Osatohamhen 1Petroleum And Natural Gas Processing Department Petroleum Training Institute Effurun, Delta State, Nigeria. Abstract: This study was conducted to investigate the effect of the age of poultry manure particulate on the bioremediation process of crude oil contaminated soil. pH, Total Hydrocarbon Content(THC) and Total Microbial Count(TMC) were measured to monitor the performance of four soil samples weighing 4kg each. These samples were polluted with 0.2kg of crude oil per kilogram soil; and amended with particulates and fertilizer of 0.2kg and 0.08kg per kilogram soil respectively. The age of particulate used in each sample varied in no particular order from 3days to 126 days. The study lasted 8weeks. Results obtained showed 99.17 %(84.10-0.70mg/kg), 98.07%(82.90-1.60mg/kg), 98.69%(84.10-1.10mg/kg) and 97.72% (83.40-1.90mg/kg) drop in Total Hydrocarbon Content for samples A,B,C and D respectively.THC for all samples fell below the FEPA limit of 10mg/l on closure. Sample A had the highest TMC 3.0x106cfu/g; while D had the least, 2.2x106cfu/g. The pH of all samples at the end of the study (6.5-6.9) fell within the range specified by FEPA (6- 9). The overall data suggested that lower aged poultry manure particulates did best and be employed in the amendment of crude oil polluted soil.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Nanotechnology for the Bioremediation of Contaminants: a Review
    processes Review Use of Nanotechnology for the Bioremediation of Contaminants: A Review Edgar Vázquez-Núñez 1,* , Carlos Eduardo Molina-Guerrero 1, Julián Mario Peña-Castro 2, Fabián Fernández-Luqueño 3 and Ma. Guadalupe de la Rosa-Álvarez 1 1 Departamento de Ingenierías Química, Electrónica y Biomédica, División de Ciencias e Ingenierías, Campus León, Universidad de Guanajuato, Lomas del Bosque 103, Lomas del Campestre, León, Guanajuato C.P. 37150, Mexico; cmolina@fisica.ugto.mx (C.E.M.-G.); [email protected] (M.G.d.l.R.-Á.) 2 Laboratorio de Biotecnología Vegetal, Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad del Papaloapan, Tuxtepec, Oaxaca C.P. 68333, Mexico; [email protected] 3 Programas en Sustentabilidad de los Recursos Naturales y Energía, Cinvestav Saltillo Industrial, Parque Industrial, Ramos Arizpe, Coahuila C.P. 25900, Mexico; [email protected] * Correspondence: edgarvqznz@fisica.ugto.mx Received: 22 May 2020; Accepted: 8 July 2020; Published: 13 July 2020 Abstract: Contaminants, organic or inorganic, represent a threat for the environment and human health and in recent years their presence and persistence has increased rapidly. For this reason, several technologies including bioremediation in combination with nanotechnology have been explored to identify more systemic approaches for their removal from environmental matrices. Understanding the interaction between the contaminant, the microorganism, and the nanomaterials (NMs) is of crucial importance since positive and negative effects may be produced. For example, some nanomaterials are stimulants for microorganisms, while others are toxic. Thus, proper selection is of paramount importance. The main objective of this review was to analyze the principles of bioremediation assisted by nanomaterials, nanoparticles (NPs) included, and their interaction with environmental matrices.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Guide to Non-Combustion Technologies for Remediation of Persistent Organic Pollutants in Soil, Second Edition – 2010
    Reference Guide to Non-combustion TechnologiesTechnologies for Remediation of Persistent Organic PollutantsPollutants in Soil, SecondS Edition - 2010 ts B an ii ta oa llu ac ll cc o u P m iic u n lla a t g tii rr o O n O tt g a yc llii n n ll c y attii on n e na orra d tt sso ap a ev ss e d B ii ss nd ee a ss udd nn ii r iitt u tiioo oo r tt siit HighHiHig latitudes e ll a a os m e -- po iidd ep DepositionDDe > evaporation PP e a M dd a ff ff o gg o oo nn t r t ii ss r High mobility oo High mobility ff ii ee pp ss cc cc ee nn aa gg aa rr Relatively high mobility rr Long-range Relatively high mobility n t Long-range n t t t aa uu i r cc i r i oceanic i oceanic o - - o rr o o gg ee transport Low mobility n transport n n n h h S o S o p p L L s s o o m m m m m m m m t t t t t t t t t a a a a a a Low latitudes t t Deposition > evaporation c Deposition > evaporation c ee ff ff ee ”” gg iinn p pp op sh as Grr ll ““G a iic T m h e e h n e C iio rm ll-C tt a a a ll iic ad ys ra h eg P De B iiore ogy med hnoll diiatiion Phytotech RR eemme giieess eddiiaattiioonn TTeecchhnnoolloog Solid Waste EPA 542-R-09-007 and Emergency Response September 2010 (5203P) www.clu-in.org/POPs Reference Guide to Non-combustion Technologies for Remediation of Persistent Organic Pollutants in Soil, Second Edition – 2010 Internet Address (URL) http://www.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable.
    [Show full text]
  • Floating Treatment Wetlands and Plant Bioremediation: Nutrient Treatment in Eutrophic Freshwater Lakes
    Floating Treatment Wetlands and Plant Bioremediation: Nutrient treatment in eutrophic freshwater lakes AN IISD-ELA AND PELICAN LAKE, MANITOBA CASE STUDY Richard Grosshans Kimberly Lewtas Geoffrey Gunn Madeline Stanley © 2019 International Institute for Sustainable Development | IISD.org/ela October 2019 Floating Treatment Wetlands and Plant Bioremediation: Nutrient treatment in eutrophic freshwater lakes © 2019 International Institute for Sustainable Development Published by the International Institute for Sustainable Development International Institute for Sustainable Development The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) is an Head Office independent think tank championing sustainable solutions to 21st–century 111 Lombard Avenue, Suite 325 problems. Our mission is to promote human development and environmental Winnipeg, Manitoba sustainability. We do this through research, analysis and knowledge products Canada R3B 0T4 that support sound policy-making. Our big-picture view allows us to address the root causes of some of the greatest challenges facing our planet today: Tel: +1 (204) 958-7700 ecological destruction, social exclusion, unfair laws and economic rules, a Website: www.iisd.org changing climate. IISD’s staff of over 120 people, plus over 50 associates and Twitter: @IISD_news 100 consultants, come from across the globe and from many disciplines. Our work affects lives in nearly 100 countries. Part scientist, part strategist—IISD delivers the knowledge to act. IISD is registered as a charitable organization in Canada and has 501(c)(3) status in the United States. IISD receives core operating support from the Province of Manitoba and project funding from numerous governments inside and outside Canada, United Nations agencies, foundations, the private sector and individuals. About IISD-ELA IISD Experimental Lakes Area (IISD-ELA) is the world’s freshwater IISD-ELA laboratory.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil Spills Bioremediation in Marine Environment-Biofilm Characterization Around Oil Droplets
    Oil spills bioremediation in marine environment-biofilm characterization around oil droplets Βιοαποδόμηση πετρελαιοειδών σε θαλάσσιο περιβάλλον - Χαρακτηρισμός σχηματισμού βιοστιβάδας σε σταγονίδια υδρογονανθράκων i ii Examination Committee Nicolas Kalogerakis – Supervisor Professor, Division II: Environmental Process Design and Analysis, School of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Crete, Chania, Greece Nikos Pasadakis – Advisory Committee Associate Professor School of Mineral Resources Engineering, Technical University of Crete, Chania, Greece Dr. Thomas R. Neu – Advisory Committee Head of Group - Microbiology of Interfaces, Department River Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Magdeburg, Germany Evangelos Gidarakos Professor, Division I: Environmental Management School of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Crete, Chania, Greece Elia Psillakis Associate Professor, Division II: Environmental Process Design and Analysis School of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Crete, Chania, Greece Danae Venieri Assistant Professor, Division II: Environmental Process Design and Analysis School of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Crete, Chania, Greece Marina Pantazidou Associate Professor Department of Geotechnical Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece iii iv Acknowledgments This work was funded by FP-7 PROJECT No. 266473 “Unravelling and exploiting Mediterranean Sea microbial diversity and ecology for xenobiotics’ and pollutants’ clean up” – ULIXES and by the European Union (European Social Fund – ESF) and Greek national funds through the Operational Program "Education and Lifelong Learning" of the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF) - Research Funding Program: Heracleitus II. Investing in knowledge society through the European Social Fund. First I would like to express my gratitude to my supervisor professor N. Kalogerakis for his support, advice and guidance in completing this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy Products Through Bioremediation of Wastewater
    sustainability Review Renewable Energy Products through Bioremediation of Wastewater Ravi Kant Bhatia 1 , Deepak Sakhuja 1 , Shyam Mundhe 1 and Abhishek Walia 2,* 1 Department of Biotechnology, Himachal Pradesh University, Summer Hill, Shimla 171005 (H.P.), India; [email protected] (R.K.B.); [email protected] (D.S.); [email protected] (S.M.) 2 Department of Microbiology, College of Basic Sciences, CSKHPKV, Palampur 176062 (H.P.), India * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +91-9815358847 Received: 24 July 2020; Accepted: 8 September 2020; Published: 11 September 2020 Abstract: Due to rapid urbanization and industrialization, the population density of the world is intense in developing countries. This overgrowing population has resulted in the production of huge amounts of waste/refused water due to various anthropogenic activities. Household, municipal corporations (MC), urban local bodies (ULBs), and industries produce a huge amount of waste water, which is discharged into nearby water bodies and streams/rivers without proper treatment, resulting in water pollution. This mismanaged treatment of wastewater leads to various challenges like loss of energy to treat the wastewater and scarcity of fresh water, beside various water born infections. However, all these major issues can provide solutions to each other. Most of the wastewater generated by ULBs and industries is rich in various biopolymers like starch, lactose, glucose lignocellulose, protein, lipids, fats, and minerals, etc. These biopolymers can be converted into sustainable biofuels, i.e., ethanol, butanol, biodiesel, biogas, hydrogen, methane, biohythane, etc., through its bioremediation followed by dark fermentation (DF) and anaerobic digestion (AD). The key challenge is to plan strategies in such a way that they not only help in the treatment of wastewater, but also produce some valuable energy driven products from it.
    [Show full text]
  • Polyculture Bioremediation
    James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Masters Theses The Graduate School Fall 2014 Polyculture bioremediation: An analysis of potential nitrogen assimilation and removal by Mya Arenaria, Gracilaria Tikvahiae and Ulva Lactuca harvests in the Corsica River, MD Kathleen Hemeon James Madison University Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019 Part of the Environmental Health and Protection Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Recommended Citation Hemeon, Kathleen, "Polyculture bioremediation: An analysis of potential nitrogen assimilation and removal by Mya Arenaria, Gracilaria Tikvahiae and Ulva Lactuca harvests in the Corsica River, MD" (2014). Masters Theses. 9. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/master201019/9 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the The Graduate School at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POLYCULTURE BIOREMEDIATION: AN ANALYSIS OF POTENTIAL NITROGEN ASSIMILATION AND REMOVAL BY MYA ARENARIA, GRACILARIA TIKVAHIAE AND ULVA LACTUCA HARVESTS IN THE CORSICA RIVER, MD Kathleen Hemeon A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Science Sustainable Environmental Resource Management November 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to first thank my advisor Dr. Joy Ferenbaugh and my committee members Dr. Nicole Radziwill and Dr. Charles Galdies for their support and guidance through my graduate studies and thesis development. I would also like to thank the JMU SERM coordinators, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioremediation of Oil Contaminated Wastewater Using Mixed Culture
    BIOREMEDIATION OF OIL CONTAMINATED WASTEWATER USING MIXED CULTURE HUSNI BIN BASHARUDIN UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PAHANG “I hereby declare that I have read this thesis and in my opinion this thesis is sufficient in terms of scope and quality for the award of the degree of Bachelor of Chemical Engineering (Biotechnology)” Signature : .................................................... Supervisor : Nasratun binti Masngut Date : 15 April 2008 BIOREMEDIATION OF OIL CONTAMINATED WASTEWATER USING MIXED CULTURE HUSNI BIN BASHARUDIN A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Bachelor of Chemical Engineering (Biotechnology) Faculty of Chemical & Natural Resources Engineering Universiti Malaysia Pahang MAY 2008 ii I declare that this thesis entitled “bioremediation of oil contaminated wastewater using mixed culture” is the result of my own research except as cited in references. The thesis has not been accepted for any degree and is not concurrently submitted in candidature of any other degree Signature : ……………………… Name of Candidate : Husni bin Basharudin Date : 15 April 2008 iii Speci al Dedic ation to my f amily members th at always love me, My friends, my fellow colle ague and all f aculty members For all your C are, Support and Believe in me iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Bismillahirrahmanirahim, I am so thankful to Allah S.W.T for giving me patient and spirit throughout this project and the research is successfully complete. With the mercifulness from Allah therefore I can produces a lot of useful idea to this project. I am indebted to my supervisor, Mrs Nasratun binti Masngut the lecturer from the Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Natural Resources for his advice, insightful comments and genours support.
    [Show full text]
  • Remediation of Polluted River Water by Biological, Chemical, Ecological and Engineering Processes
    sustainability Review Remediation of Polluted River Water by Biological, Chemical, Ecological and Engineering Processes Hossain Md Anawar 1,2 and Rezaul Chowdhury 3,* 1 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney 2109, Australia; [email protected] 2 Asia-Pacific Science Center Pte. Ltd., Singapore 534818, Singapore 3 School of Civil Engineering and Surveying, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba 4350, Australia * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-7-4631-2519 Received: 6 July 2020; Accepted: 24 August 2020; Published: 28 August 2020 Abstract: Selection of appropriate river water treatment methods is important for the restoration of river ecosystems. An in-depth review of different river water treatment technologies has been carried out in this study. Among the physical-engineering processes, aeration is an effective, sustainable and popular technique which increases microbial activity and degrades organic pollutants. Other engineering techniques (water diversion, mechanical algae removal, hydraulic structures and dredging) are effective as well, but they are cost intensive and detrimental to river ecosystems. Riverbank filtration is a natural, slow and self-sustainable process which does not pose any adverse effects. Chemical treatments are criticised for their short-term solution, high cost and potential for secondary pollution. Ecological engineering-based techniques are preferable due to their high economic, environmental and ecological benefits, their ease of maintenance and the fact that they are free from secondary pollution. Constructed wetlands, microbial dosing, ecological floating beds and biofilms technologies are the most widely applicable ecological techniques, although some variabilities are observed in their performances. Constructed wetlands perform well under low hydraulic and pollutant loads.
    [Show full text]