DOCSLIB.ORG

MONT NO Senate-92-595 PUB DATE 77 NOTE 357P.: Paper Copy Not Available Due to Smallprint Size

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MONT NO Senate-92-595 PUB DATE 77 NOTE 357P.: Paper Copy Not Available Due to Smallprint Size DOCONENT RESUME ED 190 307 RC 012 155 TITLE Meetings of the American Indian PolicyReview Commission (Washington, D.C. and Denver,Colorado, February 20, May 8 and 9, 1976). Volume 2. INSTITUTION Congress of the U.S., Washington, D.C. SenateSelect Committee on Indian Affairs. MONT NO Senate-92-595 PUB DATE 77 NOTE 357p.: Paper copy not available due to smallprint size. For related documents, see RC 012 154 and RC 012 156-159. EDRS PRICE MF01 Plus Postage. PC Not Availablefrom EDRS. DESCRIPTORS Agency Role; Alaska Natives: American Indian Education: *American Indians: Compliance (Legal); Delivery Systems: Economic Development;*Evaluati.on: *Federal Indian Relationship: Government'Role:Health Services: Hearings: NonTeservation American Indians: Organizational Effectiveness: *Policy: Reservation American Indians: Rural American Indians;Tribal Sovereignty: Tribes: *Trust Responsibility (Government): Urban American Indians /DENTIFIEPS *American Indian Policy Review Commission;American Indian Task Forces: *Bureau of IndianAffairs; Tribal Government ABSTRACT The American Indian Policy ReviewCommissioL convened a hearing on February 20,1976, to determine progress made by the task forces. The chairman of Task Force No. 1 began the testimony by explaining that his group had been involvedwith the determination of just what the rights of the Indian areand what the implica+ions are for future national commitments toIndian people. Goals stated by other chairmen were: define the rights andneeds of terminated and nonfederally recognized Indians: clarifylurisdictions so that various lawsuits could be settled: defineIndian education by and with the Indian people, describe the presentstatus of Indian education and develop a series of position papers onrecurring problems: examine the structure andfunction of tribal governments and their ability to fulfill theneeds and desires of tribal members: and elevate the health of AmericanIndians and Alaskan Natives. Other goals stated were: examine in depth the problemof Indian alcoholism; look at the total federal delivery system of Indianservices and Indian participation: examine resource areas:and review Federal-Indian law. On May 8, 1976, theCommission met in Denver to gather evidence from various triballeaders and members for determining whether the governmental structures servethe Indian people. (AN) ******************t**************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are thebest that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** ifRottwkd ee_r )icq [COMMITTEE PRINT] NJ re\ tEr, U.S. SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INDIAN AFFAIRS WI MEETINGS OF THE AMERICAN INDIAN POLICY REVIEW COMMISSION FEBWARY 20, MAY 8 AND 9, 1976 WASHINGTON, D.C. AND DENVER, COLORADO VOLUME 2 U S DEPARTMENT Cr, HEALTH EDUCATION 6 WELFARE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN RI PRO. DuCED EXACTiV AS RECEIvED F ROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGIN- ATING IT POINTS Or VIEW OW OPINIONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRE- SENT ()FL ICIAL NATIONAL II9STI TU YE :Mu( ATION POSIT iON OR POLCY Printed for the use of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Indiah Affairs U.S. GOVERNMr.NT PRINTING OFFICE 92-595 WASHINGTON : 1977 .1 SELECT COMbITTEE ON INDIAN AFFAIRS (Created* B. Rea. 4, 95th Cong.] JA)LES ABOUREZIC, South Dakota, Chairman HOWARD METZENBAUM, Ohio DEWEY F. BARTLETT, Oklahoma ZORN MELCHER, Montana MARK 0. HATFIELD, Oregon MIDST L. SUMS, Staff Director 'foal 4 CONTENTS MEETINGS 01 THZ MUSICIAN INDIAN POLICY REVIEW COMMISSION Page rebruarY 20, line 1 May 8, 1976 118 Afternoon session May 9, 1976 ,+P.--- 245 Afternoon session ;44... 800 MEETINGS OF THEAMERICAN INDIAN POLICY REVIEW COMMISSION FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 1976 AMERICAN INDIAN POLICY REVIEW COMMISSION, TVa8hington, D.C. The Commission met, pursuantto notice, at 9 :30 a.m.,in room 8110, Dirksen Senate Office Building,Senator James Abourezk(chairman) presiding. Present: Senators Abourezk,Metcalf, and Hatfield;Congressmen Yates, Meeds, and Steiger,and CommissionersBorbridge, Deer, Bruce, Whitecrow, andDial. Also present: Ernest L.Stevens, staff director;Kirke Kickingbird, general counsel ; TomFassett, public relations;and Max Richtman, professional staff member. Review Commis- Chairman ABOUREZR. TheAmerican Indian Policy sion meeting will come toorder. We do not, at this time,have a quorum. However,there are no votes official business to beconducted, and this is to be taken. There is no de- more in theform of a hearing, specificallfwith regard to trying to termine task force progress. meeting with So, we can convene becauseof that fact, and begin our members will be driftingin as time goes on. the assurance that other like Senators, The Commissioners, bythe way, are beginning to act now. For a longtime, I was worried aboutthem. They all showed up on time and never missed ameeting. I wenld like to welcomeCommissioner Now, just a brief statement. to Ada Deer and CommissionerLouis Bruce ; and a brief statement as why this meeting is called. the Commission is not entirelycertain yet t f the exact progressand of the exact direction inwhich the task forces are going incompiling the reports. I think it is essentialat this point for theCommission to find out just exactly wl-ere you areheaded. Because, if you aregoing in the wrong directionand searching out the wrongthings, there is now time to correctthat direction and change it sothat we can com- plete the reports on time.We have expressed ourintention not to go back to Congress to ask for anyextension of time. We Mtend to finish this in thetime allotted by the statute. So.it really boils down to this. Thatthis is going to be Ole onechance of the century for the Indianpeople to establish AmericanIndian policy on behalf of the Federal Government. If the Indian people miss this chance. it isnot. going tacome around /lain for quitesome time. I hope that all of the task force people and all, of the Commission willreaaze the extreme importance of getting ts work done. I guess we all have inour minds approximately what st be done, but of course,our job is to detemine exactly what has to be done. Now, the first task force thatwe want to hear from is task force No. 8. Is there any representative of task force No.8 here? Are any of .the nienthers with you, Al? Mr. &tux. Mr. Jim Bhtestone,our task force specialist is with us, Mr. Chairman. Chairman Aeoramx. I wonder if you would,as concisely as possible, relate to the Commission some of the things thatyou have been doing since you have gone into existence. STATEMENT OF ALFRED ELGIii, CHAIRMAN, TASK FORCENO. 8; ACCOMPANIED EY JAMES BLUESTONE Mr. ELGIN. As you know,our end result is going to be the final report that will be our part of an assignment givento us by the Commission. Some of the areas that we are very concerned about is thenon- recognition or the noninvolvement of American people formany, many years, as we have stated before, having little or no visibilityin the past, and having no legal basis tO be involved inmany areasro& no appropriations being set in motionthe minute legal implications. We have st,t out, as our task force assignment, togam that visibility, and to have that direct contact with the constituents that wefor the 1.sake of the Commissionidentifiedas urban and rural nonreservation. We find a strong opposition to the further dividing of those kinds of terms. We have explained toour peoples that that has only been given our geographic or our terminologyas applied to how we would be involved with the total Commission. Chairman Anotnumc. 'Would you tell us, ina couple of sentences or a short paragraph, exactly what. you believe are the objectives of your task force? What will the rerommendation be? What. doyou tItink the objective of your task force should be? Mr. acitx. Recognition of the base population of urban Indians; and somehow, include into that the mechanism of service delivery of all agencies of the Government. now. Chairman Ant/Um:MK. Br recognition : Do you mean that they should be recognized by the Feaeral Governmentas an Indian population and Indian entity, separate and apart. from reservation Indians? Mr. ELGIN. No: I think the jurisdiction needs to be identified here. In many cases, we are finding thuit there is little or no jurisdiction. Once the Indian leaves the reservation, either that Federal kind of involvement ceases, or there is no respeet for time interedmmunicational coordination nrooTam between Federal and State. Once the Indian leaves the reservation, he is no longer a tribal person. For the sake of involvement and programs, he heroines swal- lowea up into a minoritieF, type of program involvement. And.conse- quently. t his is a two-way street here. .: 3 We are trying now to identify wherethat jurisdiction ends and begins. A lot of this is coming back to the Sny1er Act,and whether or not we need newlegislation or whether we just needimplementa- tion of past legislation that has neverbeen put into effect for many people that are off the reservation. Chairman ABOUBEZK. Specifically, are youtalking about delivery of Federal services What is your specificobjective in regard to that statement ? Mr. &ow. Only that under the presentauthorities that full bene- fits be given to those people that are declaredto be eligible. A lot of people are assumed to be ineligible becauseof the false assumption that the Bureau of Indian Affairs take careof Indians wherever they migjt be, and we know that not to be thefact. airman Azommzix. You say it shouldbe the fact and is not the fact I Mr. ELGIN. We are not siying that should bethe fact because we realize that the Bureau of Indian Affairsonly operates under its au- thority:, and most of that authority is on aland-based type of problem. Chairnian Anounzzic. Has your research told youyet whether or not the Bureau of Indian Affairs doeshave that statutory authority I -Mr. &ors. Seemingly, and inhearings that we have held in our review with certain elements of ourconstituents, they assume that the Snyder Act can cover people andthe Bureau has not put that into effect yet.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MSU Extension Publication Archive Scroll Down to View
    MSU Extension Publication Archive Archive copy of publication, do not use for current recommendations. Up-to-date information about many topics can be obtained from your local Extension office. Your Community and Township Zoning Michigan State University Agricultural Experiment Station Circular Bulletin Louis A. Wolfanger, Issued February 1945 49 pages The PDF file was provided courtesy of the Michigan State University Library Scroll down to view the publication. C IRCL' lAR BCllETI!': ltH FEBRCARY 194~ CLARE COUNTY COOPERf,T:VE E~;nT~SjON SERVI CE y our Comm~~~ty R~~d TOWNSHIP ZONING 13)' LOllis A.. Wolfanger " If yu u lIH' /J lulLlLin /S for OIlL' .\',,-'(0", .t.: l"OIl' gnAiu, J 1/ you aTe /) IUlIlIiug ior fl'n ycu rs, ISf'OW U"ees. I f yo u (0' (' ,,fnnn i ll ,\! [01" (l IllOlclTed :,\'ears, gl'OH' 1111'11. " - Cltillc.'.c Pr01 'CI'" MICHIGAN STATE COLLEGE:: AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION SECTIONS OF SOIL SCIENCE AND CONSERVATION INSTITUTE FAST LANS I NC A \': Ollllll i u ('c l lf local leaders disc uss in!.!: ~'o ml11l1n i r \' L,nd-u!'l t" rrohlem ... ( l'hnt I1: .\ \ \ . ()ttcrht,iTI ,/c'ri,d l'I/ilIIJ.'fi" ,, /, 11 1111 1" ',1 /" I . , 1, 'ri,,1 , ', ,",,' 0/ UII !ll jl'idl li llr,,! " r,(i II Cli r (/ cily ill SIIIIIII!' rll .II !cit il/ull ill tit " /, r occs" ui iI"" 'I' /O/, III .'/ 11 ,\ (/ rllr(/I r cslilI'II(,( ('(lIIIIIIII II il\', Fit c silr/u(,' is 1f/lillIl" lill!/ III I/c ll tly r " lliliq . Fit,. /,roil II 1'1 i7'< ' .wi!.
    [Show full text]
  • Gou, Zaiyong, Ph.D
    Order Number 9411950 Scientific visualization and exploratory data analysis of a large spatial flow dataset Gou, Zaiyong, Ph.D. The Ohio State University, 1993 U M I 300 N. Zeeb Rd. Ann Arbor, MI 48106 SCIENTIFIC VISUALIZATION AND EXPLORATORY DATA ANALYSIS OF A LARGE SPATIAL FLOW DATASET DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio Stale University By Zaiyong Gou, B.S., M.A. $ * + $ * The Ohio State University 1993 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Duane F. Marble Morton E. O’Kelly 7 Duane F. Marble Randy W. Jackson Department of Geography DEDICATION To My Parents ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Of my thirteen years of being a geographer, the last four years under the supervision of Prof. Duane F. Marble at The Ohio State University has been the most exciting and most memorable. His wisdom and profound academic insight showed me what geography as an extraordinarily difficult discipline should be and could be. He is always the person who stands very high and sees very far, exploring the most challenging frontiers of geography relentlessly. As my academic adviser, his unfailing encouragement, guidance, patience and professional courtesy have always been my inspiration to work more creatively and more enthusiastically. He leads us to a high intellectual plateau and offers us the unlimited freedom to face the challenges and to pursue academic excellence. I am always grateful for the paths and opportunities you have pointed out to me. My gratitude also goes to Prof. Edward J. Taaffe, Prof. Morton E. O’Kelly and Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    1 Introduction The X Window System was originally developed in the early 1980’s, and encompassed from the beginning many of the windowing capabilities that we now take for granted. While in a number of ways X was (and still is) command-line oriented, the capability of moving away from the command line was inherent from the very beginning in the architecture of the system. The advent of the desktop graphical user interface (GUI) didn’t require a major redesignof the X Window System. Figure 1-1 illustrates what an X desktop might have looked like in the early days. Figure 1-1: X desktop in the early days using twm But times have changed. Shown in Figure 1-2 is what a modern X desktop can now look like. This example uses the KDE Desktop Environment described later in Chapter 9, Using KDE. Figure 1-2: Modern X desktop using KDE Quite different in appearance--the more modern example has a fancier desktop and is visually more appealing--but technically there’s little difference between these examples. The X server still communicates with the X client via the X protocol over a network, and a window manager is still being used to manage the client application windows. The basics haven’t changed, just the frills. Part I of this book describes the underlying features of X that make it such a versatile and enduring system; Part II takes a look at some of the modern window managers and the two major desktop environments, GNOME and KDE; and Part III puts the theory, which sometimes needs configuration help and effort, into practice.
    [Show full text]
  • UNM Branch Colleges
    !e University of New Mexico Los Alamos CATALOG 2012-2013 Table of Contents Welcome ......................................7 Graduation Requirements......................35 Associate Degrees . 35 Academic Calendar ............................9 Certi"cates . 35 Second Certi"cate/Associate Degree. 35 Policies ......................................13 Extension and Independent Study . 35 Applicability . 13 Cooperative Education and Internships . 36 Anti-Harassment. 13 Catalog Requirements . 36 Equal Education Policy . 13 Readmission . 36 ADA Compliance and Reasonable Accommodation. 13 Responsibility for Requirements . 36 Non-Discrimination . 13 Commencement . 36 Dean’s List. 36 General Information ..........................15 New Mexico/WICHE . 37 Role and Function of UNM Branch Colleges . 15 Mission, Vision, Values, and Strategic Goals . 15 Student Services Information ...................39 Educational Programs . 16 Records . 39 Operating Agreement and Funding . 18 Residency . 43 Accreditation . 18 Mandatory Academic Advisement . 44 Student Outcomes Assessment . 18 Schedule of Classes . 44 History of UNM–Los Alamos . 18 Registration Procedures . 44 Location. 19 Finding Out About UNM–LA . 47 Faculty. 19 Facilities. 20 General Academic Regulations..................49 Student Housing . 20 Class Hours and Credit Hours . 49 Bookstore . 20 Course Numbering System . 49 Library . 20 Grades. 49 Accelerate Technical Training Program . 21 Academic Renewal Policy . 53 Classroom Conduct . 54 Admissions...................................23 Dishonesty in
    [Show full text]
  • Next Versus Sun: a Comparison of Development Tools August 1992
    NeXT versus Sun: a Comparison of Development Tools August 1992 NeXT versus Sun: a I. Introduction: Development Comparison of Architectures Several common elements exist in all modern Development Tools programming environments that are used to develop applications with graphical user interfaces (GUI): a Executive Summary window system, a toolkit, and a layout tool. Window System core functionality required to The tools used for developing applications on NeXT! and Sun" systems appear on the surface to be sim- display graphics on the screen ilar. Sun has many tools that serve roles similar to their and receive events from the NeXTstep! counterparts. On closer inspection, however, mouse and keyboard. the Sun tools are quite different. Toolkit precompiled user interface ele- Developers using both platforms have found that ments, including windows, Sun tools lack essential, timesaving features. NeXT pro- buttons and sliders. vides many features that can be used by applications with no additional work. Examples of these include standard Layout Tool a program that allows the de- dialogs, imaging, color and printer support, and a host of veloper to prototype the user others. On the Sun these features are difficult (or, in some interface graphically. The pro- cases, impossible) to implement. totype is then written in a form Finally, and perhaps most importantly, Sun’s tools are that the real application can be not object oriented. None of the toolkits are designed to built without writing the code work with an object oriented version of C. Customization that places the windows and of Sun’s tools is not done using any known Object-Ori- buttons on the screen.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to X Window Application Development
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1992-03 An introduction to X Window application development. Rust, David Michael Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/23933 FV KNOX LIBRARY •Ud SCHOOL SivAL POSTGRADUATE SoNTEHEV.CAUFORN.AG^^ CURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1b. RESTRICTIVE MARKINGS REPORT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION UNCLASSIFIED a SECURITY CLASSIPICAT I6M AUTH6RITV 3. bisTRiBuTi6N7AVAlLABiUTY 6P REP5RT Approved for public release; b. dECLAssIFICATIoN/doWNgRADINg SCHEDULE distribution is unlimited PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REP6RT NUM&ER(S) 5. M6niT6Ring6Rgani2aTi6n rep6rT numbER(S) *. NAME 6F PERFORMING 6R6ANIZATI6N 6b OFFICE SYMBOL 7a. NAME 6E M6NIT6R1NG ORGANIZATION vdministrative Sciences Department (if applicable) Naval Postgraduate School Javal Postgraduate School AS :. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Code) 7b. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Code) /lonterey, CA 93943-5000 Monterey, CA 93943-5000 NAME OF FUNDING/SPONSORING 8b. OFFICE SYMBOL g PROCURE M E N T I NST RUMEN T ID E N T I FI CATION NUMBE R ORGANIZATION (if applicable) 6. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Code) 10. SOURCE OF FUNDING NUMBERS PROGRAM 1 PR6JECT TTa^R" WoRkUNiT ELEMENT NO. NO. NO. ACCESSION NO. 1 . TITLE (Include Security Classification) ^N INTRODUCTION TO X WINDOW APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT (U) 2 PERSONAL AUTHOR(S) lust, David M. 3a. type of report 13b. time covered 14. DATE OF REPORT (Year, Month, Day) 16. PAGE COUNT Master's Thesis from 10/90 to 03/92 1992, March, 23 70 supplementary notation 6 The views expressed in this ^sis ^ those of the author md do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the United States Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Klm Hfiuiffiiiel
    THE NEWS AflP OBSERVER, j y. A »5, I*UB. 7 sustaining poww GRAIN AND PRODUCE. gressed the lnek of NOTICE. in strength of sjh'cnil stocks, whio i Jan. 14.—At the close the Chicago, 111., The annual meeting of has Umi the marked characteristic of the of a scalping session in wheat to- the StockhoJd to dull era of North market for several days past, came slliowed a of about half the Carolina Home Insur* IRREGULAR v day, May decline anc Co. GO 9N at STOCKS Will YOUR -will be held their office, in 'l he BOKO. l Ih* mum* ami more ifelt. uisuosi- h cent. Firmness at Liverpool steadied this city, eldsely for signs of a re- on Wednesday, the 2nd day tion to watch the market early, but weak continental American Bonding and Trust Co., Baltimore, Md., of February, 1898, 12 o’clock action, became more marked and the cables and selling by the Lieter inter- at m. a very general throwing ASSETS OVFR ONE MILLION DOLLARS. BUSINESS CONFINED BONDS, CHARLES ROOT. final hour saw ests caused marked weakness late in the T 9 SURETY Secretary. of holdings by professional traders. day. Corn and oats were practically at Course of th3 Market Some- over Accepted sole surety There was no special news to account a standstill and closed unchanged. as by TT S. Government and the State and Counties of NOTICE. what Perplexing. for the break and it was probably due Provisions showed 2*6 cents declines North Carolina. forthe moat part to technical conditions. as the result of exceptionally heavy sell- recntly promi- SOLICIT THE BONDS OF The annual meeting of the stockhold- Stocks which have been ing.
    [Show full text]
  • Motif Programming Manual 1 Preface
    Motif Programming Manual 1 Preface...........................................................................................................................................................................1 1.1 The Plot..........................................................................................................................................................1 1.2 Assumptions...................................................................................................................................................2 1.3 How This Book Is Organized........................................................................................................................3 1.4 Related Documents........................................................................................................................................5 1.5 Conventions Used in This Book....................................................................................................................6 1.6 Obtaining Motif.............................................................................................................................................6 1.7 Obtaining the Example Programs..................................................................................................................7 1.7.1 FTP.................................................................................................................................................7 1.7.2 FTPMAIL......................................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • OLIT Reference Manual
    OLIT Reference Manual 2550 Garcia Avenue Mountain View, CA 94043 U.S.A. A Sun Microsystems, Inc. Business 1994 Sun Microsystems, Inc. 2550 Garcia Avenue, Mountain View, California 94043-1100 U.S.A. All rights reserved. This product and related documentation are protected by copyright and distributed under licenses restricting its use, copying, distribution, and decompilation. No part of this product or related documentation may be reproduced in any form by any means without prior written authorization of Sun and its licensors, if any. Portions of this product may be derived from the UNIX® and Berkeley 4.3 BSD systems, licensed from UNIX System Laboratories, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Novell, Inc., and the University of California, respectively. Third-party font software in this product is protected by copyright and licensed from Sun’s font suppliers. RESTRICTED RIGHTS LEGEND: Use, duplication, or disclosure by the United States Government is subject to the restrictions set forth in DFARS 252.227-7013 (c)(1)(ii) and FAR 52.227-19. The product described in this manual may be protected by one or more U.S. patents, foreign patents, or pending applications. TRADEMARKS Sun, the Sun logo, Sun Microsystems, Sun Microsystems Computer Corporation, SunSoft, the SunSoft logo, Solaris, SunOS, OpenWindows, DeskSet, ONC, ONC+, and NFS are trademarks or registered trademarks of Sun Microsystems, Inc. in the U.S. and certain other countries. UNIX is a registered trademark of Novell, Inc., in the United States and other countries; X/Open Company, Ltd., is the exclusive licensor of such trademark. OPEN LOOK® is a registered trademark of Novell, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • OUTOKUMPU OY 020/Baltian Kilpi/TJK Ym./1985 MALMINETSINTÄ Tapio Koistinen/LAP 8.3.1985
    OUTOKUMPU OY 020/Baltian kilpi/TJK ym./1985 MALMINETSINTÄ Tapio KOistinen/LAP 8.3.1985 ABSTRAKTIKOKOELMA; Helsinki symposium on the Baltic Shield, 4-6/1985 4· 4· 12· 20· 28· 36· 70 · 66· 62· 58· ml 02 &+1 3 ~ - - --~--- _ .. JAKELU OKME/Etelä-Suomi, OKME/LäTIsi-Suomi, OKME/ltä-Suomi 1 I I 1 Prof. R. Gorbatschev Dr. G. Gaal Dept. of Mineralogy and Geological Survey of Petrology Finland Institute of Geology Kivimiehentie 1 Lund University SF~02150 ESPOO 15 Sölvegatan 13 FINLAND S-223 62 LUND SWEDEN Dear Colleague, In order to activate international. cooperation on the Pre­ cambrian of northern Europe within .the framework of the Internationa1 Lithosphere Program(ILP), particu1arly its ) working groups WG 3 and WG 4, we wou1d 1ike to suggest a fact­ finding and prob1em-defining workshop to review the present state of knowledge and p1an future joint research efforts. The problems concerned wi1l be particu1arly the formation of the Proterozoic 1i thosphere, the co~tinua tion of ArcheanlTEhoge·I}e'El.c processes- in - ~- Proterozoic, and the~ve~opment~I:the-Soundary 1fetween tne PioteroZOlcärid the Archean in the central Baltic :.s1iie ld, i. e. tne-S-vecokarel lan-··-an-cf Archean- -reg ions- ef Finiand and Sweden. In addition, these aspects wi1l be related to the general Proterozoic development of the shie1d. Since this is the first effort at such a co-operation attempting to knit together more c1ose1y the treatment of Ear1y and Mid­ Proterozoic prob1ems in Finland, Sweden and Norway, it is our idea to limit participation in this pioneer workshop to a number of invited workers who are personal1y invo1ved in research on the subject, encouraging them to give reviewsof their particu1ar fields of work.
    [Show full text]
  • Zadání Diplomové Práce
    Zadání diplomové práce Název: Python GUI: Tkinter API pro Qt Student: Bc. Matěj Schuh Vedoucí: Ing. Miroslav Hrončok Studijní program: Informatika Obor / specializace: Webové a softwarové inženýrství, zaměření Softwarové inženýrství Katedra: Katedra softwarového inženýrství Platnost zadání: do konce letního semestru 2021/2022 Pokyny pro vypracování Analyzujte API knihovny Tkinter ze standardní knihovny jazyka Python. Analyzujte API frameworku Qt a jeho nadstaveb pro jazyk Python (PyQt, PySide). Analyzujte možnosti, jak mapovat Tkinter API na GUI komponenty frameworku Qt. Navrhněte implementaci těch možností, které dávají smysl. Navrhněte kvantifikátory pro měření úspěšnosti mapování Tkinter API na GUI komponenty frameworku Qt. Zvolte jednu z možností implementace a implementujte prototyp jako knihovnu pro Python pod permisivní svobodnou licencí. Součástí implementace musí být automatické testy a anglická dokumentace. Implementaci otestujte na aplikaci Python IDLE podle definovaných kvantifikátorů. Elektronicky schválil/a Ing. Michal Valenta, Ph.D. dne 24. února 2020 v Praze. Diplomov´apr´ace Python GUI: Tkinter API pro Qt Bc. MatˇejSchuh Katedra softwarov´ehoinˇzen´yrstv´ı Vedouc´ıpr´ace:Ing. Miroslav Hronˇcok 6. kvˇetna2021 Podˇekov´an´ı Na tomto m´ıstˇebych chtˇelpˇrednostnˇepodˇekovat sv´emu vedouc´ımu Ing. Mi- roslavu Hronˇcokovi, kter´ymi vˇzdypomohl s implementac´ı,n´avrhemi smˇerem m´eDiplomov´epr´ace.D´alebych chtˇelpodˇekovat rodinˇea pˇr´atel˚um,kteˇr´ımi byli bˇehemzpracov´av´an´ıoporou. Prohl´aˇsen´ı Prohlaˇsuji,ˇzejsem pˇredloˇzenoupr´acivypracoval samostatnˇea ˇzejsem uvedl veˇsker´epouˇzit´einformaˇcn´ızdroje v souladu s Metodick´ympokynem o dodrˇzo- v´an´ıetick´ych princip˚upˇripˇr´ıpravˇevysokoˇskolsk´ych z´avˇereˇcn´ych prac´ı. Beru na vˇedom´ı,ˇzese na moji pr´acivztahuj´ıpr´ava a povinnosti vypl´yvaj´ıc´ı ze z´akona ˇc.121/2000 Sb., autorsk´ehoz´akona, ve znˇen´ıpozdˇejˇs´ıch pˇredpis˚u.
    [Show full text]
  • Solaris Common Desktop Environment: Motif Transition Guide
    Solaris Common Desktop Environment: Motif Transition Guide Sun Microsystems, Inc. 4150 Network Circle Santa Clara, CA 95054 U.S.A. Part No: 816–0278–10 May 2002 Copyright 2002 Sun Microsystems, Inc. 4150 Network Circle, Santa Clara, CA 95054 U.S.A. All rights reserved. This product or document is protected by copyright and distributed under licenses restricting its use, copying, distribution, and decompilation. No part of this product or document may be reproduced in any form by any means without prior written authorization of Sun and its licensors, if any. Third-party software, including font technology, is copyrighted and licensed from Sun suppliers. Parts of the product may be derived from Berkeley BSD systems, licensed from the University of California. UNIX is a registered trademark in the U.S. and other countries, exclusively licensed through X/Open Company, Ltd. Sun, Sun Microsystems, the Sun logo, docs.sun.com, AnswerBook, AnswerBook2, OpenWindows, ToolTalk, DeskSet, Rolodex and Solaris are trademarks, registered trademarks, or service marks of Sun Microsystems, Inc. in the U.S. and other countries. All SPARC trademarks are used under license and are trademarks or registered trademarks of SPARC International, Inc. in the U.S. and other countries. Products bearing SPARC trademarks are based upon an architecture developed by Sun Microsystems, Inc. The code and documentation for the DtComboBox and DtSpinBox widgets were contributed by Interleaf, Inc. Copyright 1993, Interleaf, Inc. The OPEN LOOK and Sun™ Graphical User Interface was developed by Sun Microsystems, Inc. for its users and licensees. Sun acknowledges the pioneering efforts of Xerox in researching and developing the concept of visual or graphical user interfaces for the computer industry.
    [Show full text]