The Consequences of Losing State Sovereignty for National Elites
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
The consequences of losing state sovereignty for national elites The colonization of territories from the second half of the ХХ century occurs in a hybrid way. Depending on the case, external interested parties or interventionists use political, economic, military or humanitarian methods. In any case, the key tool of this work is social engineering. To suppress the national state, its society is divided into three categories: the resource elite, passionaries and the passive majority. The tasks of the first category: to partially finance the processes of social recoding and in time to betray the ruling elite to intercept power. The second category is the most active. These are the main performers who fill in the influence matrix, people raised by external interested parties, ideologically prepared and directly materially motivated. The third category should remain as passive as possible. This is the task that is put to the people responsible for working with it. The motivation of passionaries is understandable. They receive direct economic benefits from the change of power and dramatically improve their status in society. The passivity of the majority is achieved by misleading them and replacing historical as well as social codes. After the loss of sovereignty by the national state, the real living conditions of the overwhelming majority become worse. This is a natural process, because interventionists belong to any territory under their control, based on their interests. Sometimes these interests are of strategic nature, then the standard of living of the majority of the population does not fall so sharply. In those cases when the country is interesting to the colonialists as a source of raw materials, resources are pumped out of it as quickly as possible. Thus, with these two categories, everything is very clear. Working with people with resources and influence is the most difficult for external interventionists. The subtleties of this work, is to mislead people who have much more information than the rest of society. In the case of a lack of analytical skills to predict the result of the loss of sovereignty, these people have the resources necessary to purchase the relevant experts. The deterioration of the living conditions of the overwhelming majority of the population of the territory is an absolutely logical consequence of colonization. We see an example of this in most countries that have come under external control, such as Greece, Romania, Ukraine, and so on. Such conclusions can be made by analyzing open sources. An unpleasant situation for external interested parties can arise if the results of their interventions for resource elites are analyzed. After the transition of the state under the control of external interested parties, including through the illusory revolution, the national resource elites begin to lose their influence and, as a result, cease to be a conceptual authority in the state. The functions of conceptual power are transferred to the interventionist brain centers. This model is inherent in all post-socialist countries that have come under external control. Episode 1 Take the example of Romania. The loss of critical sovereignty for this country falls at the beginning of the zero years of the ХХI century. In 2002, Romania created a judicial anti- corruption presence - an analogue of the anti-corruption court. In 2005, a national anti- corruption department was created, which received wide powers. The fight against the national elite of Romania has developed exponentially. The abolition of immunity, the actual abolition of the presumption of innocence for officials and the external management of anti-corruption 2 bodies, clearing the local elite. On the dock were the largest businessmen of Romania, more than 10 ministers, dozens of parliamentarians, the richest Romanian oligarch - John Nikule and even ex Prime Minister Victor Ponta. The clientele of the Social Democratic Party of Romania suffered most of all, and although it is pursuing a policy of comprehensive Euro-Atlantic integration and integration into the global economic space in its foreign policy, it nevertheless defends the principles of the welfare state and national sovereignty. i.e. stands for the support of the national manufacturer. The analysis showed that, at the same time, a significant number of those politicians and businessmen who support foreign economic intervention in Romania in every possible way and contribute to the seizure of key positions in politics, finance and production by foreign capital aren’t on the dock. Foreign investors bear no criminal or administrative responsibility for the privatization mechanisms of enterprises in Romania, while thousands of government officials and hundreds of Romanian entrepreneurs are involved in hundreds of criminal cases initiated by the National Anti-Corruption Administration: cases of return of property privatized by foreign companies to state ownership are single. We conclude: modern Romania is an example of neo-colonization. And the colonial system of governance that the Western democracies have used and developed for centuries to siphon resources from the territories under their control does not imply the existence of national elites as such. Episode 2 Now consider the result of the neo-colonization of Ukraine, which took place in 2014, precisely from the point of view of the local elite. 2.7 times - it was in this proportion that the capital of the TOP-100 Ukrainian businessmen "sank" for 3 years from 2013 to 2016 according to Forbes magazine. The condition of the 100 richest Ukrainians in 2013 was estimated at 55.3 billion US dollars. By 2016 this amount decreased to $ 22.2 billion. As for the 10 richest Ukrainians, their condition has decreased from 31.1 to 10.8 billion US dollars. These figures clearly show that the loss of state sovereignty adversely affects the capitals of the local resource elite. Moreover, if you look at the business structure of the 100 richest people in Ukraine, you can get even more interesting conclusions. For example, the number of people engaged in metallurgy from 2013 to 2016 decreased from 13 to 8. During the same period, the number of businessmen engaged in such knowledge-intensive business as mechanical engineering decreased twice from 6 to 3. At the same time, the number of successful businessmen who are engaged in agribusiness in the Ukrainian elite increased from 14 to 19. During the same period, more than 88 out of 186 banks were closed in Ukraine. This analysis proves that external interested parties view Ukraine exclusively as a raw materials appendage. Thus, we can conclude that the loss of national sovereignty will primarily affect businessmen who are engaged in high-tech, processing business, finance, or critical infrastructure management. If the suppression of local elites were the main task of the interventionists, then the local oligarchs would have a chance to agree, and at least prove their effectiveness as managers. However, the interception of conceptual power (the suppression of the local) is only a tool for the main goal of any colonization, starting from ancient times, which is to get resources as cheap as 3 possible. Under the conditions of neocolonialization, this means a drop in the value of the enterprises of the colony-state against the USD of the FRS. We analyzed 27 large enterprises of Ukraine for changes in revenue (in US dollars) in the period from 2013 to 2016. In 2013, the total revenue of these companies was almost 40 billion US dollars. In 2016, the figure fell to 19.8 billion US dollars. We see a twofold decrease in the revenue of the 27 largest private enterprises in Ukraine for 3 years of neo-colonization. It is interesting that the company dealing with fertilizers takes the first place in the drop in revenue, but the second and third place of the company Igor Kolomoisky (the main Ukrainian sponsor of the Maidan). His Nikopol Ferroalloy Plant and Ukraine International Airlines lost 90.1 and 88.1 percent of revenue, respectively. The situation with state-owned enterprises is even worse. Odessa Port Plany was estimated by Dmitry Firtash at 2.5 billion US dollars in 2013. In 2018, OPP and 9 more strategic enterprises, including Turboatom and Ukrspirt, were put up for privatization for 1 billion US dollars. 4 We conclude: the goal of external interested parties is to maximize the cost of national assets of the colonized country. Thus, the complete suppression of the national element at the level of conceptual power in the colonized territories is a side effect of the process of a higher level. Therefore, the chances of preserving their capital (influence) from the locals aren’t. In this regard, remarkable relations of the Rothschild clan and President Poroshenko. Having such examples as Romania, the Ukrainian elite, headed by which in 2014. became Petro Poroshenko (precisely as a consensus of elites), began the process of maximum resistance to external pressure on the transfer of anti-corruption bodies under external control. Moreover, Poroshenko tried to compensate for the sabotage of the so-called anti-corruption reforms by heightened aggressiveness towards Russia. This scheme suited the West during the active phase of the confrontation in 2014-2016, but the costs of maintaining the Ukrainian elite are becoming increasingly critical. Six months after he came to power, in December 2014, Petro Poroshenko signed an agreement with RothschildTrust (Schweiz) AG about transferring to trust management of this structure his largest asset - the corporation Roshen. Thus, the Rothschilds received Poroshenko’s loyalty guarantee, and he became their clientele. Soros manages to form Poroshenko-Pinchuk tandem in Ukraine, which, according to the ancient Ukrainian tradition, hate each other, and compete with each other to give the “master” the best result (which is completely satisfactory). Through the Minister of Finance, a US citizen, Natalie Jaresko, Soros takes control of the external debt of Ukraine - the favorite method of usurers.