DOCSLIB.ORG

Treaty Series

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Treaty Series ( 7 j 3, UNITED NATIONS Treaty Series Treaties and international agreements registered or filed and recorded with the Secretariat of the United Nations CUMULATIVE INDEX No. 1 (Volumes 1 to 100) I: Treaty Nos. 1 to 1:1396 (Registered) II: Treaty Nos. 1 to 288 (Filed and Recorded) / Treaties and International Agreements registered or filed and recorded with the Secretariat of the United Nations INDEX (Volumes) 1 to 100 TABLE OF CONTENTS Note by the Secretariat . v Abbreviations vu Chronological Index 2 General International Agreements 221 Alphabetical Index 261 NOTE BY THE SECRETARIAT This index covers the treaties and international agreements con­ tained in Volumes 1 to 100 ofthe United Nations Treaty Series. It supersedes the previously published general indexes nos. 1-4. The volume consists ofthe following three sections: The first section, "Chronological Index", arranges the instru­ ments in the order of the dates on which they were signed or were open to signature or accession. Treaties and international agree­ ments which revise or amend a previous instrument are also indexed under the date of the previous instrument. The second section is a list of "General International Agree­ ments". The nature of this category of instruments is explained in a note at the beginning of the section. The third section, "Alphabetical Index", refers to treaties and international agreements by party and subject (see explanatory note on page 263). References Each of the treaties and international agreements included in the United Nations Treaty Series is designated by a roman numeral and an arabic numeral. The roman numeral indicates either Part I or Part II ofthe United Nations Treaty Series. Part I ofthe Treaty Series comprises treaties and international agreements registered with the Secretariat. Part II ofthe Treaty Series comprises treaties and inter­ national agreements filed and recorded by the Secretariat. The arabic numeral indicates the number of the treaty or international agreement within the respective part of the Treaty Series. For example, "1:3" indicates that the instrument is No. 3 in Part I of the Treaty Series. Treaties in the League of Nations Treaty Series are indicated by the symbol "LoN" followed by its number; for example: LoN 4587. v References to volume numbers in the United Nations Treaty Series are in arabic numerals. References to volume numbers in the League of Nations Treaty Series are in roman numerals. Dates of treaties and agreements: Two dates joined by a hyphen (e.g., 1946, 3 Jan.-5 April; or 1945, 21 Dec-1946, 3 Jan.) indicate the first and last dates in a series of exchanges of notes concerning the same agreement. Two dates of the same month divided by a fraction sign (e.g., 1943, 9/13 Dec) or of different months (e.g., 1945, 1 July/21 August) indicate, on the other hand, that no notes have been exchanged on the intervening dates. VI Treaty Series — Cumulative Index No. 1 vn ABBREVIATIONS Addit. Additional Art. Article Aug. August Bank International Bank for Reconstruction and Development Byelorussian SSR Byelorussian Sovjet Socialist Republic Dec. December Etc. Et cetera FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Feb. February Fund International Monetary Fund GATT General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade GIA General International Agreements Govt. Government ICAO International Civil Aviation Organization ICJ International Court of Justice ILO International Labour Organization Int. International IRO International Refugee Organization ITU International Telecommunication Union LoN League of Nations No. Number Nov. November OAS Organization of American States Oct. October P. Page Par. Paragraph Prelim. Preliminary Prov. Provisional Sept. September Suppl. Supplementary Temp. Temporary Trans. Translation UK United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Ukrainian SSR Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization UNICEF United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund United Kingdom United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland UNRRA United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration UPU Universal Postal Union us United States USA United States of America USSR Union of Soviet Socialist Republics Vol. Volume WHO World Health Organization WMO World Meteorological Organization CHRONOLOGICAL INDEX Chronological Index 3 CHRONOLOGICAL INDEX 1826 Treaty No. Vol. Page 26 April, USA, Treaty. Friendship, commerce and naviga- Washington Denmark tion, asamendedon 11 April 1857. Waiver most-favoured-nation clause re the Philippines. Exchange of Notes 4 May/ 10 Sept. 1946. See below 10 Sept. 1946, 1:204 Application of most-favoured-nation pro­ visions: See below 29 June 1948, 1:396 1839 6 Nov. Belgium, Provis. Agreement. Implementation of Art. London Netherlands 10 of the Treaty of 19 April 1839 con­ cerning navigation on the canal from Maestricht to Bois-le-Duc. Amended: See below 25 Jan./17 Feb. 1950, 1:756 1855 6 Sept. Great Britain, Treaty. Friendship, commerce and recip- Berne Switzerland rocal establishment. Supplemented: Addit. Convention of 30 March 1914. Extended to Liechtenstein: See below 19 May 1947, 1:664 1858 13 May USA, Treaty. Peace, friendship, commerce and Washington Bolivia navigation. Waiver most-favoured-nation clause re the Philippines. Exchange of Notes 4 May/10 June 1946. See below 10 June 1946, 1:197 1863 24 Nov. Netherlands, Treaty. Commerce and navigation. (1:1357) 98 65 Turin Italy Addit. Protocol of 22 May 1876. 98 67 Maintained in force: See below 16 Aug. 1949, 1:1357 1868 11 April Netherlands, Convention (with Protocol and Explanatory (1:1357) 98 68 The Hague Italy Notes) to regulate joint stock companies and associations. Maintained in force: See below 16 Aug. 1949,1:1357 1869 20 Nov. Netherlands, Convention. Extradition Italy Abrogated: Convention of 28 May 1897. (1:1357) 98 84 Maintained in force: See below 16 Aug. 1949, 1:1357 1870 17 June Belgium, Convention. Extradition. Brussels Spain Modification of Art. 15: See below 24 Jan. 1947, 1:301 1875 3 Aug. Netherlands, Convention. Consular. (1:1357) 98 71 The Hague Italy Maintained in force: See below 16 Aug. 1949, 1:1357 3 Aug. Netherlands, Convention. Admission of Italian consuls to (1:1357) 98 77 The Hague Italy Dutch colonies. Maintained in force: See below 16 Aug. 1949, 1:1357 4 Treaty Series — Cumulative Index No. 1 Treaty No. Vol. Page 1879 21 March Belgium, Declaration. Reciprocal communication The Hague Luxembourg of civil status records. Supplemented: Declaration of 4 March 1939 on records entailing a change of nationality. LoN 4610 CXCVII 141 Replaced: See below 25 Feb. 1949, 1:719 1880 24 Nov. Great Britain, Treaty of extradition. LoN 76a LXIX 127 Luxembourg Luxembourg Amended: Treaty of 29 May 1939. 11:284 99 301 See below 29 May 1939, 11:284 1881 12 Jan. Austria- Convention. Extradition. Vienna Hungary, Supplemented: Belgium Addit. Declaration of 1 Dec. 1930. LoN 2605 CXII 37 Re-implemented: See below 15 Oct./5 Nov. 1949, 1:739 5 (17) June USA, Convention. Consular. (1:738) 48 18 Bucharest Romania Maintained in force: See below 26 Feb. 1948, 1:738 7/12 Sept. Great Britain, Agreement. Money orders. Sweden Supplemented on 10/17 April 1891. Superseded: See below 17 Jan. 1951, 1:1301 2(14) Oct. USA, Treaty for facilitating and developing com­ Belgrade Serbia mercial relations. Most-favoured-nation provisions: Application: See below 19 July 1948, 1:1208 Waiver re the Philippines: See below 3 Oct. 1946, 1:205 1882 6 May Belgium, Convention, North Sea fisheries. The Hague Denmark, See below 30 Dec. 1948,1:362 France, Germany, Great Britain, Netherlands 1883 20 March Union Convention. Protection of industrial Paris property. See GENERAL INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS: 2 June 1934, LoN 4459 1884 9 Jan. Netherlands, Convention. Free assistance before the courts (1:1357) 98 82 The Hague Italy for indigents and waiver of security costs. Maintained in force: See below 16 Aug. 1949, 1:1357 1886 15 March Belgium, Convention. Exchange of official documents, LoN 43a XXIV 213 Brussels Brazil, scientific, and literary publications. Spain, Applications: USA, See below 14 June 1941, 11:197 Italy, 9 April 1945, 11:226 Portugal, Serbia, Switzerland Chronological Index 5 Treaty No. Vol. Page 1886 (continued) 26 July Netherlands, Convention. Provisional custody of offenders. Rome Italy Abrogated: Convention of 28 May 1897. (1:1357) 98 84 Maintained in force: See below 16 Aug. 1949, 1:1357 1889 24 Aug. Great Britain, Convention. Money orders. France Supplemented: Addit. Articles of 22 Dec. 1910. Superseded: Agreement of 24 Jan. 1951. 1:1237 90 193 See below 24 Jan. 1951, 1:1237 1890 5 July Convention. Creation of an Internat. Union LoN 108a CVII 564 Brussels for the publication of customs tariffs. Amended: See GENERAL INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS: 5 July 1890, LoN 108a 16 Dec. 1949, 1:924 1891 14 April Agreement. Int. Registration of commercial Madrid and industrial trade-marks. See GENERAL INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS: 2 June 1934, LoN 4833 1893 14 Jan. USA, Treaty. Extradition. Washington Sweden Supplemented: Addit. Treaty of 17 May 1934. LoN 3470 CL 375 Terminated: Notification of 4 Dec. 1950. 98 300 See below 4 Dec. 1950, LoN 3470 1896 14 Dec. Denmark, Provis. Declaration. Commerce. Copenhagen Portugal Supplemented: Supplementary Declaration of 18 June 1935. LoN 3760 CLXIII 51 Application: See below 8 April 1949, 1:964 2 June 1950, 1:966 See also 8 April 1949, 1:965 1897 28 May Netherlands, Convention. Extradition of offenders. (1:1357) 98 84 The Hague Italy Maintained in force: See below 16 Aug. 1949, 1:1357 1898 6 Oct. Brazil, Treaty. Frontier. Rio de Argentina Art. 1. Replaced: Janeiro See below 27 Dec. 1927, 11:193 1899 8 April Brazil, Arrangement. Telegraphic communications. Montevideo Uruguay Replaced: See below 18 May 1942, 11:207 29 July Convention. Pacific settlement of Interna- The Hague tional Disputes. Application: See below 20 Nov. 1909, (1:1357) See GENERAL INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS: 29 July 1899.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • United Nations Treaty Series Symbol
    United Nations Treaty Series Symbol Broad-gauge Porter strangulates some Aarhus after autobiographic Berkie dislodges interstate. Ric handicapping unarguably. Reid is autistic and strumming swimmingly while orthogenic Finn miaow and castes. It on which provides status have been monitoring and more responsive and effects of the un document symbol represents a communications device and confirm that nations treaty series symbol IMF DataMapper Plot and compare two data World Economic Outlook Fiscal Monitor Africa Regional Outlook Global Debt Database enable Data. These practical outcomes, series nations treaty monitoring the dean and the official records of un in one year of this sign; or elements equal access to all nations? Status of Multilateral TreatiesResearcher's Mystery of or. UNTC United Nations Treaty Collection. Treaty system are identified by gene symbol LoN followed by the arabic number of strong treaty registration Volume numbers in the United Nations Treaty than are. Promoting Gender Equality is highlighted in second series of international commitments and in national legal history policy frameworks. United Nations Treaty Collection Full rent with shadow page images of over. This virtue the United Nations Treaty Collection homepage. Nibiru Symbol Lido l'Approdo Fiumicello. Rpg of innocent civilian aid around the united nations treaty series symbol. And sales documents the United Nations Treaty Series UNTS press releases. Countries Not male the United Nations The United States recognizes 195 countries 193 of next are part clean the United Nations The two countries that call not UN members are Vatican City you See and Palestine. We often a seat in the first example, and writen by the convention on the military madness, the signature in these anunnaki came the united nations.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE ESTIMATE Soviet Military Policy In
    NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE ESTIMATE Soviet Military Policy in the Third World tnlit ..2.1'P.Oetbbei41976'4 T October 1975, the Soviets initiated an air and sealift from the USSR to help its client and in January 1976 began providing an airlift for Cuban forces between Cuba and Angola. 94. The Soviets evidently believe that the victory of a Soviet-supported national liberation movement has increased Soviet prestige in the Third World. The Soviets probably hope that Angola—where a substan- tial Cuban presence will probably remain for some [Omitted here is text unrelated to Africa.] time—may also assist the USSR in providing Soviets an entree to other national liberation movements in southern Africa—such as SWAPO. In October 1976 the Soviets signed a treaty of friendship and coopera- tion to consolidate their political position. In addition, they may hope to obtain access to port and air facilities as an alternative to those in Guinea. 95. Mozambique. Although not as extensive as that of the Chinese, Soviet aid in the form of military equipment, training, and funds assisted the Mozam- bique Liberation Front (FRELIMO) to come to power when Mozambique achieved independence in June 1975. FRELIMO will probably continue to receive substantial financial and military aid both from the USSR and the PRC. Mozambique provides training and base areas for guerrilla operations against - the white minority government of Rhodesia, an B. Africa activity to which the Soviets have given both military and political support. President Machel kept the 92. In absolute terms, Soviet military aid to sub- Soviets at arm's length immediately after independ- Saharan Africa is quite small.
    [Show full text]
  • TREATY SERIES 2007 Nº 62 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection Of
    TREATY SERIES 2007 Nº 62 Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I) Done at Geneva on 8 June 1977 Ireland’s instrument of ratification deposited with the Swiss Government on 19 May 1999 Entered into force with respect to Ireland on 19 November 1999 Presented to Dáil Éireann by the Minister for Foreign Affairs PROTOCOL ADDITIONAL TO THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS OF 12 AUGSUT 1949, AND RELATING TO THE PROTECTION OF VICTIMS OF INTERNATIONAL ARMED CONFLICTS (PROTOCOL 1) Preamble The High Contracting Parties, Proclaiming their earnest wish to see peace prevail among peoples, Recalling that every State has the duty, in conformity with the Charter of the United Nations, to refrain in its international relations from the threat or use of force against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of any State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations. Believing it necessary nevertheless to reaffirm and develop the provisions protecting the victims of armed conflicts and to supplement measures intended to reinforce their application, Expressing their conviction that nothing in this Protocol or in the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 can be construed as legitimizing or authorizing any act of aggression or any other use of force inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations, Reaffirming further that the provisions of the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 and of this Protocol must be fully applied in all circumstances to all persons who are protected by those instruments, without any adverse distinction based on the nature or origin of the armed conflict or on the causes espoused by or attributed to the Parties to the conflicts, HAVE AGREED on the following: PART I GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1 General principles and scope of application 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Treaty Series Cumulative Index
    UNITED NATIONS TREATY SERIES Treaties and international agreements registered or filed and recorded with the Secretariat of the United Nations CUMULATIVE INDEX No. 51 (Volumes 2701 to 2750) I. Treaties Nos. 45359 to 48542 (Registered) II. Treaties Nos. 1352 to 1356 (Filed and Recorded) T r e a t y S e r i e s Treaties and international agreements registered or filed and recorded with the Secretariat of the United Nations ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ C u m u l a t i v e I n d e x No. 51 (Volumes 2701 to 2750) I. Treaties Nos. 45359 to 48542 (Registered) II. Treaties Nos. 1352 to 1356 (Filed and Recorded) ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ UNITED NATIONS New York, 2016 Copyright © United Nations, 2016 All rights reserved. Printed by the United Nations Reproduction Section, New York. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form by any means, i.e., electronic, mechanical,photocopying,recording, or otherwise without the prior written permission of the United Nations. Copyright © Nations Unies, 2016 Tous droits réservés. Imprimé par la Section de la reproduction des Nations Unies, New York. La reproduction, l'archivage ou la transmission, même partiels, de la présente publication sous quelque forme quece soit par des moyens électroniques ou mécaniques,par photocopié,par enregistrement ou part tout moyen, sont subordonnés à l'autorisation préalable, donné par écrit, de l'Organisation des Nations Unies. Treaties and international agreements registered or filed and recorded with the Secretariat of the United Nations ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ CUMULATIVE INDEX No. 51 Volumes 2701 to 2750 (October 2010 - May 2011) ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ TABLE OF CONTENTS Page General Introduction ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Treaty Series
    Treaty Series Treaties and internationalagreements registered or filed and recorded with the Secretariatof the UnitedNations Recueil des Traitds Traitis et accords internationaux enregistris ou classes et inscrits au rdpertoire au Secritariatde l'Organisationdes Nations Unies Copyright © United Nations 1998 All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America Copyright © Nations Unies 1998 Tous droits r6servrs Imprimd aux Etats-Unis d'Amrrique Treaty Series Treaties and internationalagreements registered orfiled and recorded with the Secretariatof the United Nations VOLUME 1845 Recueil des Traites Traitis et accords internationaux enregistris ou classjs et inscrits au ripertoire au Secritariatde l'Organisationdes Nations Unies United Nations * Nations Unies New York, 1998 Treaties and internationalagreements registeredor filed and recorded with the Secretariatof the United Nations VOLUME 1845 1995 I. No. 31452 TABLE OF CONTENTS I Treaties and internationalagreements registeredon 1 January 1995 Page No. 31452. United Nations (United Nations Development Programme) and Ukraine: Basic Agreement concerning assistance by the United Nations Development Pro- gramme to the Government of Ukraine. Signed at Kiev on 18 June 1993 ......... 3 ANNEX A. Ratifications, accessions, subsequent agreements, etc., con- cerning treaties and international agreements registered with the Secretariatof the United Nations No. 8940. European Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dan- gerous Goods by Road (ADR). Done at Geneva, on 30 September 1957: Entry into force of amendments to annexes A and B, as amended, to the above- m entioned A greem ent ............................................................................................... 48 Corrigendum concerning the English text of the amendments proposed by the Government of France to annexes A and B, as amended, to the above- m entioned A greem ent ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Basic Principles and Practices of the Turmsh Foreign Policy Under Atatürk
    THE BASIC PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES OF THE TURMSH FOREIGN POLICY UNDER ATATÜRK YÜCEL GÜÇLÜ The fifteen years during which the Republican Turkey had been in existence under Kemal Atatürk's leadership were filled with an almost incredible activity in every field—including the foreign affairs. Few more surprising metamorphoses were recorded in history than the transformation which in the course of one decade and a half had changed old Turkey into a progressive modern country and a pillar of peace and stability in the Balkan Peninsula, in the eastern Mediterranean and in Western Asia. Turkey enjoyed the respect of all. No one dreamed of interfering in its internal affairs. Its neighbours, far from watching for opportunities to despoil it, were anxious to cultivate its friendship and they welcomed its co-operation in maintaining their common interests. Turkish diplomacy, in the period between the two world wars, wise and moderate as it showed itself, as well as vigorous and far-seeing, could not have accomplished so much if it had not been supported by radical reforms at home removing old shackles and inhibitions and opening the way for a tremendous revival of national energy and for a great development of national resources, both economic and cultural. The Turkish Constitution of 1924 had reserved a special foreign policy role to the President of the Republic. The President was well acquainted with the nation's diplomatic and security concerns. Atatürk had able lieutenants and devoted followers; but the realism and radicalism that marked Turkish foreign and internal policy since the foundation of the Republic were the fruit of his original genius.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 7659 AUSTRIA, BELGIUM, DENMARK, FEDERAL REPUBLIC
    No. 7659 AUSTRIA, BELGIUM, DENMARK, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY, FRANCE, etc. European Social Charter (with appendix). Signed at Turin, on 18 October 1961 Official texts : English and, French. Registered, on 30 March 1965 by the Council of Europe, acting on behalf of the Contract ing Parties, in accordance with Resolution 54 (6) of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, adopted on 3 April 1954. AUTRICHE, BELGIQUE, DANEMARK, RÉPUBLIQUE FÉDÉRALE D'ALLEMAGNE, FRANCE, etc. Charte sociale européenne (avec annexe). Signée à Turin, le 18 octobre 1961 Textes officiels anglais et français. Enregistrée le 30 mars 1965 par le Conseil de l'Europe, agissant au nom des Parties contractantes, conformément à la resolution 54 (6) du Comité des ministres du Conseil de l'Europe, adoptée le 3 avril 1954. 90 United Nations —• Treaty Series 1965 No. 7659. EUROPEAN SOCIAL CHARTER. 1 SIGNED AT TURIN, ON 18 OCTOBER 1961 The Governments signatory hereto, being Members of the Council of Europe, Considering that the aim of the Council of Europe is the achievement of greater unity between its Members for the purpose of safeguarding and realising the ideals and principles which are their common heritage and of facilitating their economic and social progress, in particular by the maintenance and further realisation of human rights and fundamental freedoms ; Considering that in the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms signed at Rome on 4th November 1950, 2 and the Protocol thereto signed at Paris on 20th March
    [Show full text]
  • Passman on Defrance and Ulrich Pfeil, 'Der Élysée-Vertrag Und Die Deutsch-Französischen Beziehungen 1945-1963-2003'
    H-German Passman on Defrance and Ulrich Pfeil, 'Der Élysée-Vertrag und die deutsch-französischen Beziehungen 1945-1963-2003' Review published on Thursday, June 1, 2006 Corine Defrance, Ulrich Pfeil. Der Élysée-Vertrag und die deutsch-französischen Beziehungen 1945-1963-2003. München: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, 2005. 291 S. EUR 24.80 (cloth), ISBN 978-3-486-57678-8. Reviewed by Elana Passman (Department of History, Indiana State University)Published on H- German (June, 2006) Catalyst to Cooperation? The 1963 Elysée Treaty in France and Germany Three winters ago, the tricolor waved over Berlin--from the new French Embassy near the Brandenburg Gate (through which Napoleon had marched victorious in 1806) to the Siegessäule (built to commemorate the 1870 victory over the French). The previous day, a joint French-German parliamentary session took place at Versailles, where so many wars had been ended. January 22, 2003 marked the fortieth anniversary of the Elysée Treaty (often dubbed the Treaty of Friendship), signed by Konrad Adenauer and Charles de Gaulle in 1963. Fanfare in both Berlin and Paris demonstrated the desire to neutralize--and even appropriate--symbolic sites of the old enmity. Recasting lieux de mémoire has a long legacy in the post-1945 history of Franco-German relations, and the 2003 celebrations proved no exception. This volume, drawn from a 2003 conference at the Deutsches Historisches Institut-Paris and the Sorbonne, hinges on two basic and interrelated questions. First, did Franco-German reconciliation result from the state and its representatives (read great men), from big ideas or from civil society? Second, was the Elysée Treaty the cause or the result of reconciliation between the twoErbfeinde ? Throughout the work, a rigorous and balanced scrutiny of the treaty from multiple angles belies the apparent simplicity of these queries.
    [Show full text]
  • Geneva Convention Un Treaty Series
    Geneva Convention Un Treaty Series Effected Jackie strings his Frankfurt enriches sufferably. Isador swith her straws spaciously, she contextualizes it garishly. Insulting and decided Leslie scurries: which Nat is clavate enough? Sustainability of any legislation and teach them solely upon to influence the geneva convention was drawn up and powers and public international committee may proceed with human rights of the rights law and the treaty Customsnion but act whereby a declaration form a person having full consideration would prejudice its organs or information. Other factors such as global marketing, transnational tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship, and the international movement of contraband and counterfeit cigarettes have also contributed to the explosive increase in tobacco use. ICTpects of the harter, and roads must be rehbilitated to enjoy an effective transit and transport facilitation of goods for people. General serve the United Nations shall convene other Review Conference to shift any amendments to this Statute. Human rights than other agencies, including translation into by means that it may, antelopes and should be fixed itierary. The series on air transport but deals with limitations in geneva convention un treaty series are necessary for example to correctly implement those affiliated with carriage contract forum marked difference between tribes are no duty is no. The crop of cinema of vehicles was the slant of change subsequent convention on certain temporary import of such vehicles. Ivoire is not transit. Provides suggestions for each transport is on human rights for goods in geneva convention un treaty series, by an extra incentive for. Three countries are admitted for coordination secretariat requires states succeed in geneva convention un treaty series.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Union's Common Foreign and Security Policy
    University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review Volume 6 Issue 1 THE UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI YEARBOOK Article 3 OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, VOLUME 6 1-1-1998 Building A Bridge For Defense: The European Union's Common Foreign And Security Policy Cheryl Swack Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umiclr Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Cheryl Swack, Building A Bridge For Defense: The European Union's Common Foreign And Security Policy, 6 U. Miami Int’l & Comp. L. Rev. 3 (1998) Available at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umiclr/vol6/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BUILDING A BRIDGE FOR DEFENSE: THE EUROPEAN UNION'S COMMON FOREIGN AND SECURITY POLICY CHERYL SWACK* I. INTRODUCTION II. THE CREATION OF THE NATO ALLIANCE III. THE NATO TREATY IV. THE BEGINNINGS OF THE WEU As THE DEFENSIVE COMPONENT OF THE EU V. THE WEU TREATY VI. REACTIVATING THE WEU UNDER THE MAASTRICHT TREATY VII. THE DUAL ROLES OF THE WEU AND NATO IN EUROPEAN DEFENSE VIII. FURTHER DECLARATIONS DEFINING THE ROLE OF THE WEU IX. THE WEU' S INVOLVEMENT IN PEACEKEEPING OPERATIONS IN EUROPE X. CONCLUSION 2 YEARBOOK OFINTERNATIONAL LAW [Vol. 6 The objective vis-d-vis Political Union should be to demonstrate more visibly that WEU is an integral part of the European integration process.
    [Show full text]
  • France, NATO and ESDP: the Impossible Balancing
    France, NATO and European Security: Status Quo Unsustainable; New Balance Unattainable? Jolyon HOWORTH∗ In January 1947, British and French officials met to discuss draft versions of the Treaty of Dunkirk. A sticking point emerged over the precise conditions under which the proposed mutual defence clause could be invoked. For the French, the simple threat of territorial invasion should trigger British support. For the British, however, only an actual invasion could warrant the implementation of alliance solidarity. This seemingly arcane distinction already presaged the fundamental difference of strategic approach between Paris and London which was to result in fifty years of stalemate in European defence Cupertino. For the United Kingdom (U.K.), too strong a statement of European resolve risked demotivating the United States (U.S.) and encouraging U.S. isolationism. For France, a strong Europe was the logical prerequisite for a strong Alliance. Europe needed to balance U.S. power—in the interests of both parties. Thus, from the outset of the post-war period, France expressed confidence in Europe's ability to safeguard her own future, whereas Britain worried that the old continent could never be secure without the permanent entanglement of the new1. Contrary to a great deal of mythology, France was never opposed to the “involvement of the new”—indeed the mainstream of the political class, including Charles de Gaulle himself, actively pressed for the creation of NATO and for the construction of an Atlantic partnership. What France in general (and the General in particular) could not accept was an imbalanced alliance in which one of the ∗ Jolyon Howorth is Jean Monnet Professor of European Politics at Bath University and Associate Research Fellow at the French Institute of International Relations (Ifri).
    [Show full text]
  • Bull8-Cover Copy
    220 COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECT BULLETIN More New Evidence On THE COLD WAR IN ASIA Editor’s Note: “New Evidence on History Department (particularly Prof. Zhang Shuguang (University of Mary- the Cold War in Asia” was not only the Priscilla Roberts and Prof. Thomas land/College Park) played a vital liai- theme of the previous issue of the Cold Stanley) during a visit by CWIHP’s di- son role between CWIHP and the Chi- War International History Project Bul- rector to Hong Kong and to Beijing, nese scholars. The grueling regime of letin (Issue 6-7, Winter 1995/1996, 294 where the Institute of American Studies panel discussions and debates (see pro- pages), but of a major international (IAS) of the Chinese Academy of Social gram below) was eased by an evening conference organized by CWIHP and Sciences (CASS) agreed to help coor- boat trip to the island of Lantau for a hosted by the History Department of dinate the participation of Chinese seafood dinner; and a reception hosted Hong Kong University (HKU) on 9-12 scholars (also joining the CWIHP del- by HKU at which CWIHP donated to January 1996. Both the Bulletin and egation were Prof. David Wolff, then of the University a complete set of the the conference presented and analyzed Princeton University, and Dr. Odd Arne roughly 1500 pages of documents on the newly available archival materials and Westad, Director of Research, Norwe- Korean War it had obtained (with the other primary sources from Russia, gian Nobel Institute). Materials for the help of the Center for Korean Research China, Eastern Europe and other loca- Bulletin and papers for the conference at Columbia University) from the Rus- tions in the former communist bloc on were concurrently sought and gathered sian Presidential Archives.
    [Show full text]