DOCSLIB.ORG

2015 Dspace Top Titles

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2015 Dspace Top Titles DSpace ­ https://dspace.library.colosta… Go to this report All Web Site Data Pages Jan 1, 2015 ­ Dec 31, 2015 All Sessions 100.00% Explorer Pageviews 5,000 2,500 April 2015 July 2015 October 2015 Pageviews Unique Avg. Time on Bounce Rate Page Value Page Title Entrances % Exit Pageviews Page 86,718 51,338 00:00:39 14,927 56.80% 17.21% $0.00 % of Total: % of Total: Avg for View: % of Total: Avg for View: Avg for View: % of Total: 100.00% 100.00% 00:00:39 100.00% 56.80% 17.21% 0.00% ($0.00) (86,718) (51,338) (0.00%) (14,927) (0.00%) (0.00%) 1. Search 8,341 (9.62%) 5,492 (10.70%) 00:00:27 266 (1.78%) 37.97% 5.99% $0.00 (0.00%) 2. Item Metadata 4,364 (5.03%) 1,154 (2.25%) 00:00:33 2 (0.01%) 0.00% 0.21% $0.00 (0.00%) 3. DSpace Home 3,895 (4.49%) 2,474 (4.82%) 00:01:17 2,276 (15.25%) 54.96% 45.21% $0.00 (0.00%) 4. Digital Collections of Colorado 3,472 (4.00%) 2,194 (4.27%) 00:01:10 2,041 (13.67%) 55.90% 45.25% $0.00 (0.00%) 5. Recently added 3,062 (3.53%) 1,288 (2.51%) 00:00:20 29 (0.19%) 20.69% 1.96% $0.00 (0.00%) 6. Item Status 1,614 (1.86%) 1,373 (2.67%) 00:00:07 1 (0.01%) 0.00% 0.12% $0.00 (0.00%) 7. Choose a Login Method 1,451 (1.67%) 1,018 (1.98%) 00:00:28 334 (2.24%) 53.59% 26.81% $0.00 (0.00%) 8. Colorado State University, Fort Collins 1,297 (1.50%) 633 (1.23%) 00:00:28 93 (0.62%) 23.66% 6.25% $0.00 (0.00%) 9. Item Bitstreams 865 (1.00%) 209 (0.41%) 00:00:08 0 (0.00%) 0.00% 0.46% $0.00 (0.00%) 10. Browsing by Author 728 (0.84%) 511 (1.00%) 00:00:10 0 (0.00%) 0.00% 3.85% $0.00 (0.00%) Browsing University Press of Colorado by 11. 571 (0.66%) 449 (0.87%) 00:00:24 5 (0.03%) 0.00% 3.85% $0.00 (0.00%) Title 12. Browsing 1980­2010 by Author 527 (0.61%) 60 (0.12%) 00:00:43 2 (0.01%) 0.00% 1.33% $0.00 (0.00%) 13. Colorado School of Mines 438 (0.51%) 239 (0.47%) 00:00:24 12 (0.08%) 0.00% 5.71% $0.00 (0.00%) Browsing CSU Theses and Dissertations 14. 437 (0.50%) 246 (0.48%) 00:00:08 2 (0.01%) 0.00% 3.66% $0.00 (0.00%) by Author 15. CSU Theses and Dissertations 434 (0.50%) 247 (0.48%) 00:00:20 161 (1.08%) 8.07% 8.99% $0.00 (0.00%) 16. Find Item 356 (0.41%) 109 (0.21%) 00:00:20 0 (0.00%) 0.00% 1.40% $0.00 (0.00%) 17. CSU Archives and Special Collections 350 (0.40%) 209 (0.41%) 00:00:15 9 (0.06%) 0.00% 2.86% $0.00 (0.00%) 18. Theses and Dissertations 321 (0.37%) 158 (0.31%) 00:00:34 24 (0.16%) 41.67% 9.97% $0.00 (0.00%) 19. Community List 319 (0.37%) 101 (0.20%) 00:00:18 0 (0.00%) 0.00% 0.31% $0.00 (0.00%) 20. Item submission 311 (0.36%) 279 (0.54%) 00:00:17 1 (0.01%) 0.00% 2.57% $0.00 (0.00%) 21. Sign in 290 (0.33%) 167 (0.33%) 00:00:21 1 (0.01%) 0.00% 7.93% $0.00 (0.00%) 22. Filter by: Author 268 (0.31%) 197 (0.38%) 00:00:07 0 (0.00%) 0.00% 1.87% $0.00 (0.00%) 22. Filter by: Author 268 (0.31%) 197 (0.38%) 00:00:07 0 (0.00%) 0.00% 1.87% $0.00 (0.00%) University of Colorado Anschutz Medical 23. 268 (0.31%) 125 (0.24%) 00:00:26 73 (0.49%) 16.44% 8.21% $0.00 (0.00%) Campus 24. Colorado Mesa University 265 (0.31%) 149 (0.29%) 00:00:36 8 (0.05%) 12.50% 13.58% $0.00 (0.00%) 25. University Press of Colorado 264 (0.30%) 135 (0.26%) 00:00:26 20 (0.13%) 10.00% 4.17% $0.00 (0.00%) 26. Water Resources Archive 263 (0.30%) 100 (0.19%) 00:00:33 7 (0.05%) 28.57% 4.94% $0.00 (0.00%) 27. Browsing Theses & Dissertations by Author 247 (0.28%) 116 (0.23%) 00:00:41 0 (0.00%) 0.00% 0.81% $0.00 (0.00%) 28. Page cannot be found 242 (0.28%) 193 (0.38%) 00:00:43 96 (0.64%) 57.29% 33.47% $0.00 (0.00%) 29. Browsing by Subject 235 (0.27%) 163 (0.32%) 00:00:13 2 (0.01%) 50.00% 2.55% $0.00 (0.00%) 30. View Item 217 (0.25%) 160 (0.31%) 00:00:23 0 (0.00%) 0.00% 1.38% $0.00 (0.00%) 31. Confirm 216 (0.25%) 24 (0.05%) 00:00:04 0 (0.00%) 0.00% 0.00% $0.00 (0.00%) Browsing Graduate School Theses and 32. 215 (0.25%) 25 (0.05%) 00:00:09 1 (0.01%) 0.00% 0.47% $0.00 (0.00%) Dissertations by Title 33. Graduate School Theses and Dissertations 206 (0.24%) 20 (0.04%) 00:00:12 0 (0.00%) 0.00% 0.49% $0.00 (0.00%) 34. Theses & Dissertations 203 (0.23%) 88 (0.17%) 00:00:16 4 (0.03%) 0.00% 4.43% $0.00 (0.00%) 35. University of Colorado Colorado Springs 195 (0.22%) 91 (0.18%) 00:00:34 35 (0.23%) 25.71% 11.28% $0.00 (0.00%) 36. DSpace Principal 193 (0.22%) 140 (0.27%) 00:01:52 135 (0.90%) 60.74% 59.59% $0.00 (0.00%) Browsing Colorado School of Mines by 37. 183 (0.21%) 101 (0.20%) 00:00:12 2 (0.01%) 100.00% 3.28% $0.00 (0.00%) Subject 38. 2015 170 (0.20%) 66 (0.13%) 00:01:12 3 (0.02%) 0.00% 7.65% $0.00 (0.00%) 39. Browsing by Title 161 (0.19%) 108 (0.21%) 00:00:23 0 (0.00%) 0.00% 8.07% $0.00 (0.00%) Browsing Utah State University Press by 40. 157 (0.18%) 68 (0.13%) 00:02:07 4 (0.03%) 0.00% 7.64% $0.00 (0.00%) Title 41. Главная 156 (0.18%) 153 (0.30%) 00:00:32 153 (1.02%) 96.08% 94.87% $0.00 (0.00%) Browsing Colorado School of Mines by 42. 144 (0.17%) 55 (0.11%) 00:00:17 1 (0.01%) 0.00% 2.08% $0.00 (0.00%) Author Browsing Colorado School of Mines by 43. 143 (0.16%) 8 (0.02%) 00:00:03 2 (0.01%) 50.00% 2.10% $0.00 (0.00%) Subject "Yan Lift Engineering." Browsing Colorado State University, Fort 44. 142 (0.16%) 63 (0.12%) 00:02:33 2 (0.01%) 50.00% 12.68% $0.00 (0.00%) Collins by Title 45. CSU Departments and Schools 136 (0.16%) 90 (0.18%) 00:00:11 2 (0.01%) 0.00% 0.74% $0.00 (0.00%) 46. Buscar 129 (0.15%) 107 (0.21%) 00:00:34 6 (0.04%) 33.33% 10.85% $0.00 (0.00%) 47. Filter by: Subject 126 (0.15%) 97 (0.19%) 00:00:16 3 (0.02%) 100.00% 4.76% $0.00 (0.00%) 48. Import Metadata 124 (0.14%) 14 (0.03%) 00:01:05 0 (0.00%) 0.00% 0.00% $0.00 (0.00%) Browsing Water Resources Archive by 49. 122 (0.14%) 76 (0.15%) 00:00:22 0 (0.00%) 0.00% 0.82% $0.00 (0.00%) Subject 50. OA Fund Articles 122 (0.14%) 17 (0.03%) 00:00:26 1 (0.01%) 0.00% 0.82% $0.00 (0.00%) 51. Browsing Colleges and Schools by Title 118 (0.14%) 4 (0.01%) 00:00:07 0 (0.00%) 0.00% 0.00% $0.00 (0.00%) 52. Browsing by Issue Date 117 (0.13%) 85 (0.17%) 00:00:41 1 (0.01%) 100.00% 8.55% $0.00 (0.00%) Browsing Carpenter (Delph E. and Family) 53. 112 (0.13%) 29 (0.06%) 00:00:08 0 (0.00%) 0.00% 0.00% $0.00 (0.00%) Papers by Title 54. DSpace Startseite 111 (0.13%) 76 (0.15%) 00:00:32 73 (0.49%) 64.38% 56.76% $0.00 (0.00%) 55. CSU Colleges 109 (0.13%) 57 (0.11%) 00:00:06 3 (0.02%) 0.00% 0.92% $0.00 (0.00%) University of Colorado Boulder, William A. 56. 109 (0.13%) 57 (0.11%) 00:00:29 1 (0.01%) 0.00% 6.42% $0.00 (0.00%) Wise Law Library 57. College of Nursing 108 (0.12%) 24 (0.05%) 00:00:14 0 (0.00%) 0.00% 0.93% $0.00 (0.00%) 58. Recherche 105 (0.12%) 85 (0.17%) 00:00:26 2 (0.01%) 50.00% 2.86% $0.00 (0.00%) 59. Photographs 104 (0.12%) 27 (0.05%) 00:00:08 0 (0.00%) 0.00% 4.81% $0.00 (0.00%) 60.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE MAGNESITE DEPOS11's of WASHINGTON Their Occurrence and Technology
    WASHINGTON GEOLOGICAL SUR\ EY HENRY LANDES, State Geologist BULLETIN NO. 25 THE MAGNESITE DEPOS11'S OF WASHINGTON Their Occurrence and Technology By GEORGE E. WHITWELL and ERNEST N. P A'l1TY OLYMPIA FRANK K . LAMBORN ~ P UBLIC PRINTER 1921 BOARD O:H' GEOLOGICAL TRYEY GoYernor Lours F. HART, Olwirma11. , tatc Trea. m·cr C. L. B.,LlrocK, H('cre lary. Pre. i<l e11 t Hirn RY rz:z., 1,1.0. President EnxEt";T 0. H o1.1 .,,:--o. fuxnY L .\XOES, S ta te a,,olooisl. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Governor L oui::; F. Hart, Chafrman, and Members of the Board of Geologtcal t:liir·vey: GmnLEMEX : I have the honor to submit herewith a report entitled "The :Magnesite Deposits of Washing­ ton; Their Occurrence and Technolo 0 y ,'' hy George E. Wl1i twell and Ernest N. Patty, with the recommendation that it be printed as Bulletin No. 25 of the Sttr\·ey reports. V Cl'Y respectfully, HENRY LANDES, State Geologist. Univ er. i ty Station, Seattle, January 15, 192]. CONTENTS. Page GEXt:IIAf, STATE,\1 1•: XT. 11 Introduction . 11 Mineralogy and composition....... ........... 12 General character or magnesite..... ....... ................. 14 Comparative analyses......................... .............. 15 Dt:SCllll'TlOX OF TIU; Di::POSITS.................................... 16 Location . 16 Discovery and history of develotJment......................... 16 Transportation . 22 ~fining methods.. 23 Power . 26 Geology . 27 Occurrence and geologic relations. 27 Reserves . 28 Structural features.... 28 Genesis . 31 Prospecting . 39 Northwest Magnesite Company. 41 Finch deposit. 41 General features............. 41 Description or the deposit. 41 Mining methods employed............................. 43 Description or coarse crushing plant. ................. 44 Keystone deposit ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bear Valley Mountain Resort Expansion (7910)
    Bear Valley Mountain Resort United States Expansion (7910) Department of Agriculture Forest Service Environmental Assessment Stanislaus National Forest Stanislaus National Forest Calaveras Ranger District Alpine County, CA September 2012 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C.-20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Table of Contents 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................1 1.2 Forest Plan Direction ..............................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • The Dialectics of Virtuosity: Dance in the People's Republic of China
    The Dialectics of Virtuosity: Dance in the People’s Republic of China, 1949-2009 by Emily Elissa Wilcox A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Joint Doctor of Philosophy with the University of California, San Francisco in Medical Anthropology of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Xin Liu, Chair Professor Vincanne Adams Professor Alexei Yurchak Professor Michael Nylan Professor Shannon Jackson Spring 2011 Abstract The Dialectics of Virtuosity: Dance in the People’s Republic of China, 1949-2009 by Emily Elissa Wilcox Joint Doctor of Philosophy with the University of California, San Francisco in Medical Anthropology University of California, Berkeley Professor Xin Liu, Chair Under state socialism in the People’s Republic of China, dancers’ bodies became important sites for the ongoing negotiation of two paradoxes at the heart of the socialist project, both in China and globally. The first is the valorization of physical labor as a path to positive social reform and personal enlightenment. The second is a dialectical approach to epistemology, in which world-knowing is connected to world-making. In both cases, dancers in China found themselves, their bodies, and their work at the center of conflicting ideals, often in which the state upheld, through its policies and standards, what seemed to be conflicting points of view and directions of action. Since they occupy the unusual position of being cultural workers who labor with their bodies, dancers were successively the heroes and the victims in an ever unresolved national debate over the value of mental versus physical labor.
    [Show full text]
  • From: Lee Greenwald To
    From: Lee Greenwald To: FS-objections-pnw-mthood Subject: Twilight Parking lot Date: Monday, March 03, 2014 11:44:20 PM Attachments: 2013 International Report on Snow Mountain Tourism.pdf Cross-country skiing experiencing a Nordic renaissance Olympian.pdf Twilight Parking Lot OBJECTION 3-1-14 EAE v2.doc Dear objections official, I previously raised several objections concerning Mt Hood Meadows application to build the Twilight Parking lot. Though some, not all, of these objections were ostensibly addressed in their responses, they were not addressed fully nor adequately. I raised concerns regarding Meadows assumptions on growth in demand for Alpine skiing. The last ten years MHM stated continued growth trends, but actually the most recent previous two years that has not been the trend. The true growth is in Nordic skiing. The majority of the Nordic community is against the creation of the Twilight lot without a comprehensive analysis of potential future use of this terrain, and nearby Nordic trails and connecting trails. This type of analysis has not been done, and would be precluded by proceeding with the construction of the Twilight lot before all future use options have been considered. Second, I asked that MHM be required by the FS to place the funds, $500,000, for a Nordic center in a designated account for a future Nordic center building, and a restrictive timeline for construction. If the parking lot is to be built, the Nordic community should have some prior input on the Nordic facility to be built prior to the lots final approval. The response that was posted simply stated that "a" facility would be built within three years.
    [Show full text]
  • Entr/2008/006/Lot 1
    FRAMEWORK SERVICES CONTRACT ENTR/2008/006/LOT 1 Impact Assessment Study Concerning the Revision of Directive 2000/9/EC Relating to Cableway Installations Designed to Carry Persons Final Report prepared for DG Enterprise and Industry RPA October 2012 FRAMEWORK SERVICES CONTRACT ENTR/2008/006/LOT 1 Impact Assessment Study Concerning the Revision of Directive 2000/9/EC Relating to Cableway Installations Designed to Carry Persons Final Report – 19th October 2012 prepared for DG Enterprise & Industry by Risk & Policy Analysts Limited, Farthing Green House, 1 Beccles Road, Loddon, Norfolk, NR14 6LT, United Kingdom Tel: +44 1508 528465 Fax: +44 1508 520758 Email: [email protected] RPA REPORT – ASSURED QUALITY Project: Ref/Title J766/Cableways Approach: In accordance with the Contract and the Commission’s Comments Report Status: Final Report Report Prepared by: Daniel Vencovsky, Senior Consultant Clare Bowman, Researcher Tobe Nwaogu, Principal Consultant Marco Camboni, Consultant Aländji Bouorakima, Researcher Jeremy Brutus, Consultant Report approved for issue by: Pete Floyd, Director Date: 19th October 2012 If produced by RPA, this report is printed on 100% recycled, chlorine-free paper DISCLAIMER While RPA considers that the information and opinions given in this report are sound, the report is based on assumptions and information that are subject to uncertainties. Due to such uncertainties and because events may not occur as expected, there is a possibility that the results presented in this report will be different from situations which occur in the future. This report has been prepared for the European Commission in accordance with the associated contract and RPA will accept no liability for any loss or damage arising out of the provision of the report (and/or associated data) to third parties.
    [Show full text]
  • W Ith P Rize D Ra W
    April 2010 8 No. 181 • 35th Year Page 2 With prize draw 5 digital picture frames to be won The 6-CLD Rosaël, France, replaces a 4-CLD built in1985. The lift is designed to operate at wind speeds of up to 30 m/s (108 km/h). p.3 Trendsetters of Skiwelt Amadé (Austria) Doppelmayr built a Funifor from the Italian Top-of-the-range lifts in Flachau, Flachauwinkl and Wagrain. Pp.4 - 7 mountain village of Sella Nevea, up to Ropeways for urban transport Prevala on the Italian-Slovenian border. p.9 People mover in Venice, funicular in Biel, gondolas in Algeria. Pp.10 - 14 New: Wood effect finish for UNI-G undercover Two lifts for the new ski resort of Konakli in Eastern Turkey. p.16 Three lifts in China’s idyllic landscapes Recreation area for Beijing; sightseers and pilgrims from around the globe. p.20 Sun Valley’s first gondola lift Doppelmayr CTEC realized the biggest ropeway project in the US in 2009. p.24 “Comfort mode” for the 8-MGD Casino Express Stop-and-go solution for enhanced comfort in Canada. p.26 Magazine for Customers and Employees 2 Doppelmayr/Garaventa Group New lifts in Courchevel and Orelle Les Trois Vallées in ituated in the French region of The sector consists of villages named the French Alps is the Savoie, Les Trois Vallées prides itself after their respective altitudes: Courchev- on being the biggest connected ski el Saint Bon/1100 is the original center world’s biggest ski S area in the world. It lies between altitudes of the resort; the other villages are 1300, region.
    [Show full text]
  • Eldora Mountain Resort 2011 Master Plan
    2011 MASTER PLAN Prepared by: TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 1-1 A. LOCATION ....................................................................................................................................................... 1-2 B. RESORT SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................... 1-2 C. BACKGROUND AND DEVELOPMENT HISTORY.......................................................................................................... 1-3 D. ABSTRACT OF THE MASTER PLAN ......................................................................................................................... 1-4 1. Lift Replacements ................................................................................................................................... 1-4 2. Lift Additions ........................................................................................................................................... 1-5 3. Terrain Improvements ............................................................................................................................ 1-5 4. Guest Services ......................................................................................................................................... 1-5 5. Snowmaking ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Banff and Lake Louise Dan Evans Dan
    2018 / 19 Ski Holiday Catalogue CREATING MEMORIES SINCE 1969 LIGHTWEIGHT HAS NEVER PERFORMED SO WELL. If something is light, the mind tends to think that it might not be performance driven. HEAD has broken this idea with its new NEXO line of ski boots. GRAPHENE KG WEIGHT They added the Nobel award winning material into the mix this year. This has allowed them The Nexo 130 is a shocking 1.5kg per boot. to reduce the thickness of the plastic without Pick it up. You won’t believe your senses! Less compensating on performance. weight = less fatigue = more fun! FORM FIT 100% customizable shell. Quick and easy. With the added Graphene, it holds all modifications even better than before. LIQUID FIT Available on most models, this is a new revolutionary system that ensures comfort- able performance-oriented customization via injectable inserts in the ankle area. They use an incompressible paraffin based material that can be removed or added to at any time. LAST The 100mm last offers a superior fit. It features an expanded toe box for comfort and warmth and a generous instep height with a bi-injection for ease of entry. A VALUED PARTNER OF FOLLOW US @CORBETTSSNOW COME TALK WITH OUR GREAT BOOTFITTERS AT CORBETTS. CONTACT US Get fit up in a pair of the lightest, most comfortable boots you’ve ever had. [email protected] Visit us in-store to find out about our boot fit guarantee WWW.CORBETTS.COM Corbetts Ski + Snowboard Shop 120 Speers Rd, Oakville Ontario, L6K 2E7. Tel: 905-845-1561 LIGHTWEIGHT HAS NEVER PERFORMED SO WELL.
    [Show full text]
  • APPRAISAL of the LIQUIDATION VALUE Mt. Ashland Ski Area For
    APPRAISAL OF THE LIQUIDATION VALUE Mt. Ashland Ski Area For City of Ashland, Oregon OCTOBER 26 2006 AN ORDERLY LIQUIDATION VALUE APPRAISAL OF THE PROPERTY AT THE MT ASHLAND SKI AREA ASHLAND, OREGON OCTOBER 26, 2006 i 511 W 22nd Ave. Post Falls, ID 83854 (208) 457-1148 (208) 699-3817 Cell (866) 233-1947 Fax TED FARWELL MAI www.winterstar.us [email protected] January 3, 2007 Mr. Lee Tuneberg City of Ashland Ashland OR Re: Appraisal – Orderly Liquidation Value of Mt. Ashland Ski Area Properties Dear Mr. Tuneberg; I have prepared an orderly liquidation value appraisal of the Mt. Ashland Ski Area properties in Jackson County, Oregon as requested and authorized by the City of Ashland by form contract dated October 4, 2006. The purpose of this appraisal is to estimate the orderly liquidation value of the Mt. Ashland Ski Area properties, as they existed on October 26, 2006. The properties are entirely located on a 1,180-acre USFS land use permit. This valuation is dated October 26, 2006. The attached report of 47 pages describes the properties and the appraisal process. CERTIFICATION I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. The report analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are my personal, unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and I have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2. Design Criteria and Applicable Forest Service Direction
    2013 MASTER PLAN JANUARY 2013 Prepared by: R Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. I-1 A. LOCATION .......................................................................................................................................... I-1 B. RESORT SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................. I-2 C. BACKGROUND AND DEVELOPMENT HISTORY ............................................................................................ I-4 1. 1940s and 1950s........................................................................................................................ I-4 2. 1960s ......................................................................................................................................... I-4 3. 1970s ......................................................................................................................................... I-4 4. 1980s ......................................................................................................................................... I-5 5. 1990s ......................................................................................................................................... I-5 6. 2000s ......................................................................................................................................... I-5 D. LOVELAND’S
    [Show full text]
  • Design of a Ski Lift Inspection & Maintenance System
    Design of a Ski Lift Inspection & Maintenance System May 9, 2018 ─ Katie Barthelson, Shallu Darhele, Miguel Mitra, Pritika Sondhi INSPEX - “Because ski lift inspections shouldn’t be a slippery slope” 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 1.0 Context Analysis 5 1.1 Ski Resorts and Ski Lifts 5 1.2 Operating Costs 5 1.3 Components 6 1.4 Regulations 8 1.5 Inspection Requirements, Frequency, and Methods 9 1.6 Failure Analysis 12 1.7 Economics of Ski Lift Maintenance 20 1.8 Accident/Incident Statistics 23 1.8.1 Passenger Statistics 23 1.8.2 Occupational Statistics 24 1.8.3 Reliability 25 1.9 Economics of Increased Inspections 27 2.0 Stakeholder Analysis 27 Ski Resorts 28 Maintenance and Inspection Personnel 28 Visitors 28 Parts Manufacturers 28 Regulators 29 NSAA 29 Insurance Companies 29 Other 30 3.0 Gap Analysis and Problem Statement 33 3.1 Gap Analysis 33 3.2 Problem Statement 34 4.0 Need Statement 34 5.0 Concept of Operations 35 General Concept of Operation for the Current Method 35 Proposed Concept of Operations 35 Image Processing for the Aerial and Tower Platforms 37 2 6.0 Design Alternatives 37 Current Method 37 Aerial Platform 38 Tower-based Platform 42 Cameras for Design Alternatives 43 7.0 Requirements 44 7.1 Inspection System Requirements 44 7.1.1 Mission Requirements 44 7.1.2 Functional Requirements 44 7.1.3 Design Requirements 45 7.2 Simulation Requirements 45 7.2.1 I/O Requirements 45 7.2.2 Time I/O Requirements 45 7.2.3 Cost I/O Requirements 46 7.2.4 Accuracy I/O Requirements 46 7.2.4 Availability I/O Requirements 46 8.0 Simulation
    [Show full text]
  • Master Development Plan from Developer Mountain Capitol Partners
    PREFACE This Mountain Resort Master Development Plan (MDP) is intended to be the guiding document for future development at Nordic Valley Ski Resort. Illustration 1 is a visual representation of the process on which this document is based. First, an overall resort vision and guiding goals were determined based on market needs, resort niche and long-term outlook. These vision and goal statements help inform the entire process; that is, to help answer questions such as, What’s important to our guests?, What makes our resort special?, and Where should we invest our time, money and resources? With a vision and goals established, the next step is to inventory existing conditions at the resort to identify existing strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and constraints. This is critical information that goes into the resort planning phase. Details are collected such as the number of lifts and their conditions, the square footage of guest service spaces and how many parking spaces are available. Physical resources are also inventoried to help identify ideal locations to develop or to avoid due to environmental sensitivity. The next phase of the MDP process is to analyze existing capacities of various facility components to determine imbalances within the operation. Collectively, this analysis leads to the identification of improvements that would bring existing facilities into better balance, help the resort prioritize projects and help the resort to operate more efficiently. Accomplishing these goals will result in a well-balanced resort, which provides an adequate array of services and experiences to satisfy guest expectations for a quality recreation experience. The results of this process are documented in this MDP.
    [Show full text]