En En Amendments 77

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

En En Amendments 77 European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Legal Affairs 2020/0374(COD) 30.6.2021 AMENDMENTS 77 - 160 Draft opinion Tiemo Wölken (PE693.727v01-00) Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector (Digital Markets Act) Proposal for a regulation (COM(2020)0842 – C9-0419/2020 – 2020/0374(COD)) AM\1235316EN.docx PE695.090v01-00 EN United in diversityEN AM_Com_LegOpinion PE695.090v01-00 2/76 AM\1235316EN.docx EN Amendment 77 Daniel Buda Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (1) Digital services in general and (1) Digital services in general and online platforms in particular play an online platforms in particular play an increasingly important role in the increasingly important role in the economy, in particular in the internal economy, in particular in the internal market, by providing new business market, by providing new business opportunities in the Union and facilitating opportunities in the Union and facilitating cross-border trading. cross-border trading as well as innovation development opportunities. Or. ro Amendment 78 Daniel Buda Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (2) Core platform services, at the same (2) Core platform services, at the same time, feature a number of characteristics time, feature a number of characteristics that can be exploited by their providers. that can be exploited by their providers. These characteristics of core platform These characteristics of core platform services include among others extreme services include among others extreme scale economies, which often result from scale economies, which often result from nearly zero marginal costs to add business nearly zero marginal costs to add business users or end users. Other characteristics of users or end users. Other characteristics of core platform services are very strong core platform services are very strong network effects, an ability to connect many network effects, an ability to connect many business users with many end users business users with many end users through the multi-sidedness of these through the multi-sidedness of these services, a significant degree of services, a significant degree of dependence of both business users and end dependence of both business users and end users, lock-in effects, a lack of multi- users, lock-in effects, the discouraging homing for the same purpose by end users, and lack of multi-homing for the same vertical integration, and data driven- purpose by end users, vertical integration, advantages. All these characteristics and data driven-advantages. All these combined with unfair conduct by providers characteristics combined with unfair of these services can have the effect of conduct by providers of these services can AM\1235316EN.docx 3/76 PE695.090v01-00 EN substantially undermining the have the effect of substantially contestability of the core platform services, undermining the contestability of the core as well as impacting the fairness of the platform services, and discouraging commercial relationship between providers investment in innovation for potential new of such services and their business users operators on the market, as well as and end users, leading to rapid and impacting the fairness of the commercial potentially far-reaching decreases in relationship between providers of such business users’ and end users’ choice in services and their business users and end practice, and therefore can confer to the users, leading to rapid and potentially far- provider of those services the position of a reaching decreases in business users’ and so-called gatekeeper. end users’ choice in practice, and therefore can confer to the provider of those services the position of a so-called gatekeeper. Or. ro Amendment 79 Andrzej Halicki, Axel Voss, Adam Jarubas Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (2) Core platform services, at the same (2) Core platform services, at the same time, feature a number of characteristics time, feature a number of characteristics that can be exploited by their providers. that can be exploited by their providers. These characteristics of core platform These characteristics of core platform services include among others extreme services include among others extreme scale economies, which often result from scale economies, which often result from nearly zero marginal costs to add business nearly zero marginal costs to add business users or end users. Other characteristics of users or end users. Other characteristics of core platform services are very strong core platform services are very strong network effects, an ability to connect many network effects, an ability to connect many business users with many end users business users with many end users through the multi-sidedness of these through the multi-sidedness of these services, a significant degree of services, a significant degree of dependence of both business users and end dependence of both business users and end users, lock-in effects, a lack of multi- users, lock-in effects, a lack of multi- homing for the same purpose by end users, homing for the same purpose by end users, vertical integration, and data driven- vertical integration, and data driven- advantages. All these characteristics advantages. All these characteristics combined with unfair conduct by providers combined with unfair conduct by providers of these services can have the effect of of these services can have the effect of substantially undermining the substantially undermining the contestability of the core platform services, contestability of the core platform services, as well as impacting the fairness of the as well as impacting the fairness of the PE695.090v01-00 4/76 AM\1235316EN.docx EN commercial relationship between providers commercial relationship between providers of such services and their business users of such services and their business users and end users, leading to rapid and and end users, leading to rapid and potentially far-reaching decreases in potentially far-reaching decreases in business users’ and end users’ choice in business users’ and end users’ choice in practice, and therefore can confer to the practice, and therefore can confer to the provider of those services the position of a provider of those services the position of a so-called gatekeeper. so-called gatekeeper, depending on their size. Or. en Amendment 80 Andrzej Halicki, Axel Voss, Adam Jarubas Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (5) It follows that the market processes (5) It follows that the market processes are often incapable of ensuring fair and ex-post competition law are often economic outcomes with regard to core incapable of ensuring fair economic platform services. Whereas Articles 101 outcomes with regard to core platform and 102 TFEU remain applicable to the services. Whereas Articles 101 and 102 conduct of gatekeepers, their scope is TFEU remain applicable to the conduct of limited to certain instances of market gatekeepers, their scope is limited to power (e.g. dominance on specific certain instances of market power (e.g. markets) and of anti-competitive dominance on specific markets) and of behaviour, while enforcement occurs ex anti-competitive behaviour, while post and requires an extensive investigation enforcement occurs ex post and requires an of often very complex facts on a case by extensive investigation of often very case basis. Moreover, existing Union law complex facts on a case by case basis. does not address, or does not address Moreover, existing Union law does not effectively, the identified challenges to the address, or does not address effectively, the well-functioning of the internal market identified challenges to the well- posed by the conduct of gatekeepers, which functioning of the internal market posed by are not necessarily dominant in the conduct of gatekeepers, which are not competition-law terms. necessarily dominant in competition-law terms. Or. en Amendment 81 Daniel Buda AM\1235316EN.docx 5/76 PE695.090v01-00 EN Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (6) Gatekeepers have a significant (6) Gatekeepers have a significant impact on the internal market, providing impact on the internal market, providing gateways for a large number of business gateways for a large number of business users, to reach end users, everywhere in the users, to reach end users, everywhere in the Union and on different markets. The Union and on different markets. The adverse impact of unfair practices on the adverse impact of unfair practices on the internal market and particularly weak internal market and particularly weak contestability of core platform services, contestability of core platform services, including their negative societal and including their negative societal and economic implications, have led national economic implications, have led national legislators and sectoral regulators to act. A legislators and sectoral regulators to act. A number of national regulatory solutions number of national regulatory solutions have already been adopted or proposed to have already been adopted or proposed, or address unfair practices and the are in the process of being adopted, to contestability of digital services or at least address unfair practices and the with regard to some of them. This has contestability of digital services or at least created a risk of divergent
Recommended publications
  • European Parliament 2019-2024
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ITRE_PV(2019)0925_1 MINUTES Meeting of 25 September 2019, 9.00-12.30 and 14.30-18.30 BRUSSELS 25 September 2019, 9.00 – 10.00 In camera 1. Coordinators’ meeting The Coordinators’ meeting was held from 9.00 to 10.00 in camera with Adina-Ioana Vălean (Chair) in the chair. (See Annex I) * * * The meeting opened at 10.04 on Wednesday, 25 September 2019, with Adina-Ioana Vălean (Chair) presiding. 2. Adoption of agenda The agenda was adopted. PV\1189744EN.docx PE641.355 EN United in diversityEN 3. Chair’s announcements Chair’s announcements concerning coordinators’ decisions of 3 September 2019. Chair has informed the Committee members that the Committee meeting of 7-8 October has been cancelled due to the Commissioner hearing. The next ITRE Committee meeting will take place on the 17 October 2019. 4. Approval of minutes of meetings 2-3 September 2019 PV – PE641.070v01-00 The minutes were approved. *** Electronic vote *** 5. Establishing the European Cybersecurity Industrial, Technology and Research Competence Centre and the Network of National Coordination Centres ITRE/9/01206 ***I 2018/0328(COD) COM(2018)0630 – C8-0404/2018 Rapporteur: Rasmus Andresen (Verts/ALE) Responsible: ITRE Vote on the decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations The decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations was adopted: for: 49; against: 12; abstention: 2. (Due to technical issues, roll-call page is not available) 6. Labelling of tyres with respect to fuel efficiency and other essential parameters ITRE/9/01207 ***I 2018/0148(COD) COM(2018)0296 – C8-0190/2018 Rapporteur: Michał Boni Responsible: ITRE Vote on the decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations The decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations was adopted: for: 56; against: 3; abstention: 4.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Ms Mairead Mcguinness European Commissioner for Financial Services, Financial Stability and the Capital Markets Union Mr
    TO: Ms Mairead McGuinness European Commissioner for Financial Services, Financial Stability and the Capital Markets Union Mr Valdis Dombrovskis European Commission Executive Vice-President for An Economy that Works for People CC: Mr Frans Timmermans European Commission Executive Vice-President for the European Green Deal Ms Kadri Simson European Commissioner for Energy Brussels, 13 April 2021 Dear Executive Vice-President Dombrovskis, Dear Commissioner McGuinness, We are convinced that the Taxonomy Regulation is crucial for the European Union to achieve both the new greenhouse gas emissions reduction target for 2030 and climate neutrality by 2050. Additionally, the Regulation should help strengthening the European Union’s strategic resilience and global economic competitiveness, maintaining its energy security and affordability, boosting growth and job creation and supporting a just and inclusive energy transition that leaves nobody behind. However, to what extent the Taxonomy Regulation will ultimately meet these expectations depends primarily on the technical screening criteria (TSC) defined in the Delegated Act on climate change mitigation and adaptation. We understand the European Commission will publish it later this month, whereupon the European Parliament may make full use of its scrutinizing prerogatives under Article 290 TFEU. In advance of its publication, we would like to share with you some of our major concerns regarding the revised draft version of this delegated act. Firstly, it is indispensable that the Taxonomy Regulation takes into account transition at the energy system level and supports the most cost-efficient decarbonisation pathway for each Member State in line with the principle of technology neutrality. In this context, it is key to acknowledge the role of gaseous fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • Poland by Piotr Arak, Piotr Żakowiecki
    Poland by Piotr Arak, Piotr Żakowiecki Capital: Warsaw Population: 38 million GNI/capita, PPP: $23,930 Source: World Bank World Development Indicators. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 National Democratic 3.25 3.50 3.25 3.25 2.75 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.75 Governance Electoral Process 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.75 1.50 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.50 1.50 Civil Society 1.50 1.25 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 Independent Media 2.25 2.25 2.00 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.75 Local Democratic 2.25 2.25 2.00 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.50 1.50 1.50 Governance Judicial Framework 2.25 2.50 2.25 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.75 and Independence Corruption 3.00 3.00 2.75 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.50 3.50 3.50 Democracy Score 2.36 2.39 2.25 2.32 2.21 2.14 2.18 2.18 2.21 2.32 NOTE: The ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. If consensus cannot be reached, Freedom House is responsible for the final ratings. The ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest.
    [Show full text]
  • BUDG Results of the First Voting Session 1 July 2021
    1 July 2021 at 11:08 VOTING LIST BUDG First Voting Session Concerned text AM Tabled by Remarks Rapp Vote Transfers of appropriations ­ General Budget 2021 ­ Section III ­ Commission (Pierre Larrouturou) DEC Roll­call vote + 13/2021 34/1/3 DEC Roll­call vote + 14/2021 38/1/0 Transfers of appropriations ­ General Budget 2021 ­ Other Sections (Olivier Chastel) ECA V/AB Roll­call vote + ­ 36/0/3 02/T/21 ECA V/AB Roll­call vote + ­ 36/0/3 03/T/21 ECA V/AB Roll­call vote + ­ 36/2/1 04/C/21 ECA V/AB Roll­call vote + ­ 39/0/0 05/C/21 ECA V/AB Roll­call vote + ­ 36/0/3 06/C/21 ECA V/AB Roll­call vote + ­ 39/0/0 07/A/21 ECA V/AB Roll­call vote + ­ 38/0/1 08/A/21 CoR DEC Roll­call vote + 1/2021 34/2/3 CoJ 1­ Roll­call vote + INF/2021 35/0/4 CoJ 2­ Roll­call vote + INF/2021 37/0/2 EESC INF Roll­call vote + 6/2021 35/2/2 EUSF implementation (Robert Biedron) Paragraph 1 CA Rapporteur If adopted, 1, 3, 4 and 2 fall + + 1 36/2/1 Paragraph 1 1 Pekkarinen, Ştefănuță, Falls if CA 1 adopted + ↓ Torvalds, Hayer, Körner, Chastel, Gheorghe Paragraph 1 3 Ressler Falls if CA 1 or 1 adopted + ↓ Paragraph 1 4 Laporte, Bonfrisco, Falls if CA 1 adopted ­ ↓ Grant Paragraph 2 CA Rapporteur If adopted, 5, 2 and 6 fall + + 2 35/1/3 Paragraph 2 5 Pekkarinen, Torvalds, Falls if CA 2 adopted + ↓ Hayer, Körner, Chastel, Gheorghe Paragraph 1 2 Hahn Falls if CA 1, CA 2 or 5 ­ ↓ adopted Paragraph 2 6 Hahn Falls if CA 2 adopted + ↓ Paragraph 3 and CA Rapporteur If adopted, 7, 8 and 9 fall + + paragraph 3a 3 37/1/1 (new) Paragraph 2 a 7 Ştefănuță, Chastel, Falls if CA 3 adopted
    [Show full text]
  • Isbn: 978-80-7510-234-8
    ISBN: 978-80-7510-234-8 2015 – Elections in Poland and Spain and their consequences Editors: Mariusz Kolczyński, Małgorzata Myśliwiec, María José Pérez del Pozo Opava 2017 dĂďůĞŽĨŽŶƚĞŶƚƐ INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 3 Causes of Changes in Political Situation in Poland and Spain in 2015 ..................................... 7 (Małgorzata Myśliwiec) POLAND .................................................................................................................................. 22 Political and Personality Aspects of Creating Political Leadership in 2015 Presidential Election in Poland (Rafał Glajcar, Agnieszka Turska-Kawa, Waldemar Wojtasik) .............................. 23 European Union in Electoral Programmes of Polish Political Parties in 2015 (Tomasz Kubin) .................................................................................................................................................. 41 Central and Eastern Europe in Electoral Programmes of Polish Political Parties in 2015 (Sebastian Kubas) ..................................................................................................................... 55 Television in the 2015 Electoral Campaign in Poland (Mariusz Kolczyński, Dagmara Głuszek- Szafraniec) ................................................................................................................................ 65 Social Media in an Electoral Campaign: The Case of Polish Parliamentary
    [Show full text]
  • En En Minutes
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ENVI_PV(2020)0928_1 MINUTES Meeting of 28 September 2020, 13.45-15.45 BRUSSELS The meeting opened at 13.55 on Monday, 28 September 2020, with Pascal Canfin (Chair) presiding. 1. Adoption of agenda ENVI_OJ(2020)0928_1 The agenda was adopted in the form shown in these minutes. 2. Chair's announcements The Chair made the following announcements: Interpretation status: due to scarcity of resources and technical restrictions in the meeting room and based on the linguistic profile of ENVI Members, interpretation was available in 6 languages: French, German, Italian, English, Spanish and Polish. Electronic meeting file/Webstreaming: The Chair announced that as usual, the meeting file was available electronically via the e-meeting application and that the meeting would be web streamed. Remote participation of ENVI Members: The Chair announced that the meeting would be held in a remote participation format. At 15.45, the remote voting session opened. Members taking part in the vote had received a ballot paper- voting list that needed to be signed and sent back with the voting indications PV\1217944EN.docx PE660.271v01-00 EN United in diversityEN before 17.45. The results of the votes on the amendments would be announced in writing. Information on the outcome on the budget amendments : The Chair informed that during the voting session on 21 September 2020, ENVI had voted on the amendments to the "General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2021 - all sections". The list of the adopted amendments could be found on the website.
    [Show full text]
  • Adam Barabasz the Polish Elections to the European Parliament in 2014 As Shown in the Polish Press
    Adam Barabasz The Polish elections to the European Parliament in 2014 as shown in the Polish press Rocznik Integracji Europejskiej nr 8, 317-331 2014 Nr 8 ROCZNIK INTEGRACJI EUROPEJSKIEJ 2014 ADAM BARABASZ DOI: 10.14746/rie.2014.8.22 Poznań The Polish elections to the European Parliament in 2014 as shown in the Polish press Poland has already had three European elections since its accession to the European Union. On May 25, 2014, the Polish public elected fifty-one members of the European Parliament (MEPs) for another term of five years. Similarly to the 2004 and 2009 elec­ tions, the main concern of Polish journalists was voter turnout. This time, the turnout amounted to 23.84% giving the leading position to the Civic Platform (PO) party, which won 32.13% of votes. Law and Justice (PiS) came second with 31.78% votes, followed by the Democratic Left Alliance (SLD - 9.44%), the New Right (NP - 7.15%) and the Polish People’s Party (PSL - 6.8%). United Poland, the coalition Europa Plus-Your Move (EPTR), Poland Together, the National Movement, the Green Party of Poland and the Direct Democracy Election Committee failed to achieve the election threshold of 5%. The most influential Polish newspapers and magazines were assessing the strategy of different parties’ election committees throughout the entire campaign. New faces of the campaign, alongside the profiles of those MEPs who were battling to get to Strasbourg once again, were presented. The style of the campaign, the language of TV election spots and the means the parties used in order to generate social support were stressed.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Results
    Briefing June 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Results Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 7 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 3 seats 2 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Heinz Christian Strache 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide 6. Alexander Bernhuber 7. Barbara Thaler NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 1. Maria Arena* Socialist Party (PS) Christian Social Party 3. Johan Van Overtveldt 2. Marc Tarabella* (S&D) 2 seats (CSP) (EPP) 1 seat New Flemish Alliance (N-VA) 1. Olivier Chastel (Greens/EFA) Reformist 2. Frédérique Ries* 4 seats Movement (MR) (ALDE) 2 seats 1. Philippe Lamberts* 2. Saskia Bricmont 1. Guy Verhofstadt* Ecolo (Greens/EFA) 2. Hilde Vautmans* 2 seats Open Flemish Liberals and Democrats (Open 1. Benoît Lutgen Humanist VLD) (ALDE) 2 seats democratic centre (cdH) (EPP) 1 seat 1. Kris Peeters Workers’ Party of 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Zaufanie Do Polityków W Marcu”, Marzec 2013 (Oprac
    Warszawa, marzec 2015 ISSN 2353-5822 NR 39/2015 ZAUFANIE DO POLITYKÓW W MARCU Znak jakości przyznany CBOS przez Organizację Firm Badania Opinii i Rynku 9 stycznia 2015 roku Fundacja Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej ul. Świętojerska 5/7, 00-236 Warszawa e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] http://www.cbos.pl (48 22) 629 35 69 Marcowe badanie1 zaufania do polityków przeprowadzone zostało w trakcie nabierającej tempa i intensywności kampanii przed wyborami prezydenckimi. W czasie jego realizacji oficjalnie – konwencją w Warszawie – rozpoczęła się kampania urzędującego prezydenta. W tym miesiącu listę polityków obdarzanych największym społecznym zaufaniem tradycyjnie otwiera prezydent Bronisław Komorowski (75%, bez zmian). Warto jednak zauważyć, iż jednocześnie po raz kolejny nieznacznie wzrósł odsetek deklarujących nieufności do głowy państwa (12%, wzrost od lutego o 1 punkt procentowy i łącznie o 5 punktów od października 2014 roku). W marcu ponownie, po dwóch miesiącach przerwy, jedynym obok prezydenta politykiem, który może się pochwalić zaufaniem ponad połowy polskiego społeczeństwa jest premier i przewodnicząca Platformy Obywatelskiej Ewa Kopacz (51%). Od lutego odsetek Polaków deklarujących zaufanie do pani premier znacząco wzrósł (o 7 punktów procentowych), a zmalała grupa deklarujących wobec niej nieufność (o 5 punktów, do 27%). Trzecie miejsce w marcowym rankingu zaufania zajmuje Andrzej Duda, któremu w porównaniu z lutym znacznie przybyło deklaracji zaufania (o 12 punktów procentowych, do 40%), a nieco zmniejszył się odsetek Polaków deklarujących nieufność (o 3 punkty, do 20%). W porównaniu z poprzednim miesiącem wzrosła też rozpoznawalność kandydata Prawa i Sprawiedliwości na prezydenta RP – obecnie jedynie 12% badanych twierdzi, że nie zna jego osoby (od lutego spadek o 11 punktów).
    [Show full text]
  • PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION in POLAND 10Th May 2015
    On 10th May next the Poles will be going to ballot in the first round of the presidential election. If none of the 11 candidates running manages to win an absolute majority a second round will be organised two weeks later - on 24th May. The main opposition party, Law and Justice (PiS) criticised the dates chosen for the election – indeed the first round will take place two days after the commemoration of the 70th anniversary of the end of the Second World War (an international ceremony is being organised in Gdansk on 8th May together with outgoing head of State Bronislaw Komorowski (Civic Platform, PO)). This presidential election is of special importance outgoing head of State; in view of the parliamentary elections that will – Andrzej Duda (Law and Justice, PiS), MEP; take place in Poland in October next. The election – Magdalena Ogorek, supported by the Democratic campaign will start just after the appointment of Left Alliance (SLD), historian (specialist of the President of the Republic. the history of the Catholic Church), journalist and actress. She has also worked for various According to the polls outgoing head of State institutions including the Polish Central Bank; Bronislaw Komorowski is due to be elected for – Janusz Palikot (Your Movement, TR), a liberal, a second mandate in May. The most recent poll anti-Church businessman elected MP during the by IBRiS for the daily Rzeczpospolita, published last general election on 9th October 2011, a on 30th March last credited him with 41% of the mandate from which he has since resigned; vote in the first round ahead of Andrzej Duda (Law – Adam Jarubas (People’s Party,PSL), Vice- and Justice, PiS), who is due to win 27% of the President and Governor (President of the Region) vote.
    [Show full text]
  • CCUS: Time to Incentivise Carbon-Removals Technologies to Achieve Climate Neutrality
    14 June 2021 To: Frans Timmermans, First Executive Vice-President of the European Commission CC: Kadri Simson, Commissioner for Energy Thierry Breton, Commissioner for the Internal Market and Services Virginijus Sinkevičius, Commissioner for Environment, Oceans and Fisheries Dear Executive Vice-President Timmermans, CCUS: Time to incentivise carbon-removals technologies to achieve climate neutrality The ambition of the EU regarding both the 2030 and 2050 climate targets is now confirmed. Stakeholders ranging from the UNFCCC and the IEA to other global economies, including the US and China, recognise that reducing CO2 emissions to net zero by 2050 cannot realistically be achieved without deployment of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) / Carbon Capture and Utilization (CCU). Model scenarios that limit global warming to 1.5 or 2°C rely on large amounts of CO2 removals from the atmosphere. Capturing and permanently storing the CO2 from different industries across Europe, including cement, fertilizers, steel, refining, chemicals and waste facilities can help achieve this. For instance, CCS deployed with Waste-to-Energy does not simply curb the release of CO2 emissions; through the burning of unrecyclable and otherwise untreatable biogenic waste, it actually removes emissions from the atmosphere. It is a game changer, and part of the climate and circular economy solution. We believe that environmentally safe and socially beneficial CO2 removal technologies are a key complement to the EU’s existing climate change mitigation tools. In particular, bioenergy combined with CCS (BECCS) provides opportunity of CO2 removals to be stored with a degree of permanence that nature-based removals of CO2 alone can rarely offer.
    [Show full text]