DOCSLIB.ORG

Heritage at Risk Register 2019, South West

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Heritage at Risk Register 2019, South West South West Register 2019 HERITAGE AT RISK 2019 / SOUTH WEST Contents The Register III Content and criteria III Key statistics V Key to the entries VI Entries on the Register by local planning VIII authority Bath and North East Somerset (UA) 1 Bournemouth Christchurch and Poole 3 (UA) Bristol, City of (UA) 5 Cornwall (UA) 9 Devon 47 Dartmoor (NP) 47 East Devon 71 Exeter 78 Exmoor (NP) 78 Mid Devon 80 North Devon 82 South Hams 87 Teignbridge 94 Torridge 96 West Devon 103 Dorset (UA) 107 Gloucestershire 145 Cheltenham 145 Cotswold 145 Forest of Dean 150 Gloucester 153 Stroud 154 Tewkesbury 157 Isles of Scilly (UA) 161 North Somerset (UA) 165 Plymouth, City of (UA) 167 Somerset 171 Exmoor (NP) 171 Mendip 174 Sedgemoor 180 Somerset West and Taunton 184 South Somerset 188 South Gloucestershire (UA) 193 Swindon (UA) 195 Torbay (UA) 197 Wiltshire (UA) 199 II HERITAGE AT RISK 2019 / SOUTH WEST THE REGISTER Many structures fall into the ‘not applicable’ category, The Heritage at Risk Register includes historic for example: ruins, walls, gates, headstones or boundary buildings and sites at risk of being lost through stones. neglect, decay or deterioration. Condition is assessed as ‘very bad’, ‘poor’, ‘fair’ or It includes all types of designated heritage assets, ‘good’. The condition of buildings or structures on including Conservation Areas, which are designated the Register is typically very bad or poor, but can be and assessed by Local Planning Authorities. fair or, very occasionally, good. This reflects the fact that some buildings or structures are vulnerable The aim of the Register is to focus attention on because they are empty, underused or face those places in greatest need. Historic England, in redundancy without a new use to secure their partnership with others, is able to help tackle future. Assessing vulnerability in the case of buildings heritage at risk. We work with owners, friends in fair condition necessarily involves judgement and groups, developers and other stakeholders to find discretion. A few buildings remain on the Register in imaginative solutions for historic places and sites at good condition, having been repaired or mothballed, risk across England. but still awaiting a new use or occupancy. More information about our role, the advice and Buildings or structures are removed from the funding available, and useful publications and Register when they are fully repaired/consolidated, guidance is available on our website. and their future secured either through occupation and use, or through the adoption of appropriate Criteria for inclusion management. on the Register PLACES OF WORSHIP To be considered for inclusion on the Register, places RISK ASSESSMENTS of worship must be listed grade I, grade II* or grade II on the National Heritage List for England, and be used Heritage assets included on the Register are assessed as a public place of worship at least six times a year. according to the nature of the site. The risk assessment methodologies outlined below are based Places of worship are assessed on the basis of on factors which can threaten the different types of condition only. If a place of worship is in very bad or heritage assets and lead to them becoming at risk. poor condition, it is added to the Register. This includes places of worship which are generally in fair BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES or good condition but have major problems with one key element, like the tower. To be considered for inclusion on the Register, buildings or structures must be: Once on the Register, places of worship can move through the condition categories (e.g. from very bad • listed on the National Heritage List for England; to poor, to fair, even good) as repairs are and implemented and the condition improves, until they • in secular (non-worship) use. are fully repaired and can be removed from the And either: Register. This means that there are some places of • a grade I or II* listed building, or worship in good condition on the Register but with • a grade II listed building in London, or outstanding issues still to be resolved at the time when • a structural scheduled monument with they were assessed. upstanding remains. ARCHAEOLOGY Buildings or structures are assessed on the basis of condition and, where applicable, occupancy (or use) To be considered for inclusion on the Register, reflecting the fact that a building which is occupied archaeological sites must be listed as scheduled is generally less vulnerable than one that is not. monuments and included on the National Heritage List for England. Occupancy (or use) is assessed as ‘vacant’, ‘part- occupied’, ‘occupied’, ‘not applicable’, or occasionally, Archaeology assessments cover scheduled ‘unknown’. earthworks and buried archaeology. III HERITAGE AT RISK 2019 / SOUTH WEST The risk assessment is based on their condition and Wreck sites are assessed based on their current vulnerability, the trend in their condition, and their condition, vulnerability and the way they are being likely future vulnerability. A site’s condition is managed. expressed in terms of the scale and severity of adverse effects on it, ranging from ‘extensive Wrecks are vulnerable to both environmental and significant problems’ to ‘minor localised problems’. human impacts. Risks that contribute to inclusion on the Register range from unauthorised access to Archaeological entries are removed from the erosion and fishing damage. The monitoring process Register once sufficient progress has been made to ensures that the significance of the site is identified address the identified issues, and a significant and maintained. In spite of the inherent difficulties in reduction in the level of risk has been demonstrated. caring for this type of site, careful management must be maintained. PARKS AND GARDENS Wrecks are removed from the Register once an To be considered for inclusion on the Register, parks appropriate management and monitoring regime and gardens must be listed as grade I, grade II* or is operational. grade II and included on the National Heritage List for England. Parks and gardens are assessed in terms of CONSERVATION AREAS condition and vulnerability. Steps being taken by owners to address problems are also taken into Once a year Historic England asks every local consideration. authority in England to consider the state of its conservation areas and fill in (and update as Parks and gardens assessed as being at risk are typically appropriate) risk assessment questionnaires for affected by development and neglect. They have those that cause concern, or are believed to no frequently been altered by development or are faced longer be at risk. with major change. The original function of these landscapes has often changed and divided ownership Conservation areas that are deteriorating, or are in leads to the loss of their cohesive historic design. very bad or poor condition and not expected to change significantly in the next three years, are Park and garden entries are removed from the defined as being at risk. Register once steps have been taken to address issues and positive progress is being made. The approach taken to assess conservation areas at risk has been refined since the first survey in 2008/2009. An BATTLEFIELDS overall category for condition, vulnerability and trend is included for each conservation area on the Heritage at To be considered for inclusion on the Register, Risk Register. Conservation areas identified as at risk in battlefields must be listed and included on the 2009, but not reassessed since using the revised National Heritage List for England. Battlefields methodology, are included on the Register but with deemed to be at risk of loss of cultural significance limited information. are included on the Register. Conservation areas are removed from the Register The principal risks and threats are: once plans have been put in place to address the • development pressure e.g. issues that led to the conservation area being at risk, encroachment of buildings; and once positive progress is being made. • pressures of particular use within the site e.g. arable cultivation; • damage e.g. unregulated metal detecting. Battlefields are removed from the Register either when damaging activities cease/are managed, or when threats recede due to effective planning. WRECK SITES To be considered for inclusion on the Register, wrecks must be listed and included on the National Heritage List for England. IV HERITAGE AT RISK 2019 / SOUTH WEST the greatest cause of risk affecting 37.6% of Key statistics archaeological entries on the Register. In the South West the proportion is 31.9%. The greatest risk to entries on the South West BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES Register, affecting 34.1% of them, is from Nationally, 748(3.3%) of grade I and II* listed unrestricted plant, scrub and tree growth. buildings (excluding places of worship) are The national figure for plant, scrub and tree on the Register. In the South West the growth is 26.3%. percentage is 2.8% (148listed secular buildings). PARKS AND GARDENS 102(6.1%) of England’s 1,669 registered 4 building or structure entries have been parks and gardens are on the Register. Of removed from the 2018 South West the 304 registered parks and gardens in the Register because their futures have been South West, 17 (5.6%) are on the Register. secured, and 12 have been added. No park and garden entries have been 67.4% of buildings or structures (124) on the removed from the 2018 South West South West baseline 1999 Register have Register, and 1entry has been added. been removed because their futures have been secured compared with the national BATTLEFIELDS figure of 65.3%. Of the 47 registered battlefields in England, 3(6.4%) are on the Register. PLACES OF WORSHIP Of the 10 registered battlefields in the South Nationally, 6.2% of listed places of worship West, 1 was on the Register in 2018 and has are on the Register.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Environment Agency – Community Flood Plan Contents
    Parishes and communities working together Community Crediton Address Council Offices, 8A North Street, Crediton, EX17 2BT or group Floodline Quickdial 0345 988 1188 Which Environment Agency Mid Devon Rivers - Flood Alerts for the Rivers Number flood warnings are you Creedy, Creedy Yeo, Little Dart, Lapford Yeo and registered to receive? their tributaries Local flood warning trigger Environment Agency Flood Alert for Mid Devon Rivers OR Met Office Severe Weather Warning for i.e. when water reaches bottom of the bridge Rain Date 17th December 2018 Environment Agency – Community Flood Plan Contents 1. Actions to be taken before a flood A - Locations at risk of flooding: flood warnings B - Locations at risk of flooding: locations at risk of flooding / sources of flooding C - Locations at risk of flooding: map showing direction of flooding 2. Actions to be taken during a flood A - Local flood actions B - Local volunteers / flood wardens C - Important telephone numbers D - Available resources E - Arrangements between authorities F - Vulnerable residents, properties and locations 3. After a flood A - Reputable contractors Environment Agency – Community Flood Plan 1A – Locations at risk of flooding: Flood warnings Area no. Location of risk Trigger level Actions Area 1 Fordton Met Office weather warnings or • Alert your CRT to the rainfall forecast especially if heavy rain has started. Environment Agency flood warnings. • CRT to check adequate equipment in store. • CRT to advice community to be prepared to protect properties. Flood Alert issued for River Yeo • Start local observations. Signs to watch for include: ➢ Heavy rain and/or severe weather reports ➢ Rainfall not draining away, leading to surface water flooding ➢ Rising river levels, with dark churning water ➢ A build-up of debris in rivers, which could give way and cause a water surge • Consider starting the activation procedure and incident log (Annex E of Emergency Plan) Area 2 A377 (From Met Office weather warnings or • Alert your CRT to the rainfall forecast especially if heavy rain has started.
    [Show full text]
  • Nether Cerne Church Plan
    NETHER CERNE ALL SAINTS MARCH 2021 CHURCH PLAN Part A - Current Report Part B - Survey Results of our open survey conducted in Summer and Autumn 2020, canvassing all community contacts for their reaction to Part A. The survey remains open and available at this location. Please feel free to repeat your survey response or complete the survey for the first time. Part C - Community Recommendations Minutes of any community meetings held to discuss the information available in other parts of the Church Plan. Part D - Action Plan Details of any actions agreed through Community Recommendations, assigned to community participants, Churches Conservation Trust staff, or to the Churches Conservation Trust Local Community Officer specifically. Part A - Current Report Church Introduction & Statement of Significance All Saints Church in Nether Cerne, Dorset, England was built in the late 13th century. It is recorded in the National Heritage List for England as a designated Grade I listed building, and is a redundant church in the care of the Churches Conservation Trust. It was declared redundant on 1 December 1971, and was vested in the Trust on 8 March 1973. The church and adjacent manor house are built of bands of flint and stone. Most of the church dates from the 13th century, although the tower, with its pinnacles and gargoyle, and porch were added in the 15th. The interior of the church includes a melon-shaped 12th century font, believed to date from an earlier church on the same site. Current use (bookings) & voluntary activity All Saints currently enjoys permission from The Church of England for six Sunday services each year and four additional services on an occasional basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Development Strategy for 2015-20
    Local Development Strategy 2015-2020 Greater Dartmoor LEAF Local Development Strategy 2015-2020 CONTENTS CONTENTS 1 1. THE LOCAL ACTION GROUP PARTNERSHIP 2 1.1. Membership 2 1.2. Structure and decision making process 3 1.3. Local Action Group staff, numbers and job descriptions 4 1.4. Equal opportunities statement (the public sector equality duty) 5 1.5. Involvement of the community and consultation activity undertaken 6 1.6. Training requirements 7 2. THE LAG AREA 8 2.1. Map of the area 9 2.2. Rural population covered 10 3. THE STRATEGY 12 3.1. Description of Strategy 12 3.2. A ‘’analysis of the local area 16 3.3. Evidence of alignment with LEP activity 17 3.4. Your local priorities 18 3.5. Programmes of activity 19 3.6. Targets, results and outputs 20 3.7. Sustainability appraisal 20 3.8. Proposed cooperation activity 20 4. MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION 21 4.1. Accountable Body and Delivery Body 21 4.2. Project development and assessment procedures 22 4.3. Claims and payments 23 4.4. Communications and publicity 25 4.5. Monitoring and Evaluation 25 5. FINANCIAL PLAN 27 5.1. Expenditure for each year, by measure 27 5.2. Overall funding profile 28 5.3. Use of grants, procurement or other type of financial support 28 6. LETTER OF ENDORSEMENT FROM HOTSW LEP 29 7. BIBLIOGRAPHY 30 APPENDIX A: FINANCIAL TABLE APPENDIX B: OUTPUTS TABLE APPENDIX C: GD LEAF GEOGRAPHY OUTPUT AREAS 1 Greater Dartmoor LEAF Local Development Strategy 2015-2020 1. THE LOCAL ACTION GROUP PARTNERSHIP 1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr
    26 . 3 . 84 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr . L 82 / 67 RICHTLINIE DES RATES vom 28 . Februar 1984 betreffend das Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten landwirtschaftlichen Gebiete im Sinne der Richtlinie 75 /268 / EWG ( Vereinigtes Königreich ) ( 84 / 169 / EWG ) DER RAT DER EUROPAISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN — Folgende Indexzahlen über schwach ertragsfähige Böden gemäß Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe a ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden bei der Bestimmung gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Euro­ jeder der betreffenden Zonen zugrunde gelegt : über päischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft , 70 % liegender Anteil des Grünlandes an der landwirt­ schaftlichen Nutzfläche , Besatzdichte unter 1 Groß­ vieheinheit ( GVE ) je Hektar Futterfläche und nicht über gestützt auf die Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG des Rates vom 65 % des nationalen Durchschnitts liegende Pachten . 28 . April 1975 über die Landwirtschaft in Berggebieten und in bestimmten benachteiligten Gebieten ( J ), zuletzt geändert durch die Richtlinie 82 / 786 / EWG ( 2 ), insbe­ Die deutlich hinter dem Durchschnitt zurückbleibenden sondere auf Artikel 2 Absatz 2 , Wirtschaftsergebnisse der Betriebe im Sinne von Arti­ kel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe b ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden durch die Tatsache belegt , daß das auf Vorschlag der Kommission , Arbeitseinkommen 80 % des nationalen Durchschnitts nicht übersteigt . nach Stellungnahme des Europäischen Parlaments ( 3 ), Zur Feststellung der in Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe c ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG genannten geringen Bevöl­ in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe : kerungsdichte wurde die Tatsache zugrunde gelegt, daß die Bevölkerungsdichte unter Ausschluß der Bevölke­ In der Richtlinie 75 / 276 / EWG ( 4 ) werden die Gebiete rung von Städten und Industriegebieten nicht über 55 Einwohner je qkm liegt ; die entsprechenden Durch­ des Vereinigten Königreichs bezeichnet , die in dem schnittszahlen für das Vereinigte Königreich und die Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten Gebiete Gemeinschaft liegen bei 229 beziehungsweise 163 .
    [Show full text]
  • Devon Rigs Group Sites Table
    DEVON RIGS GROUP SITES EAST DEVON DISTRICT and EAST DEVON AONB Site Name Parish Grid Ref Description File Code North Hill Broadhembury ST096063 Hillside track along Upper Greensand scarp ST00NE2 Tolcis Quarry Axminster ST280009 Quarry with section in Lower Lias mudstones and limestones ST20SE1 Hutchins Pit Widworthy ST212003 Chalk resting on Wilmington Sands ST20SW1 Sections in anomalously thick river gravels containing eolian ogical Railway Pit, Hawkchurch Hawkchurch ST326020 ST30SW1 artefacts Estuary cliffs of Exe Breccia. Best displayed section of Permian Breccia Estuary Cliffs, Lympstone Lympstone SX988837 SX98SE2 lithology in East Devon. A good exposure of the mudstone facies of the Exmouth Sandstone and Estuary Cliffs, Sowden Lympstone SX991834 SX98SE3 Mudstone which is seldom seen inland Lake Bridge Brampford Speke SX927978 Type area for Brampford Speke Sandstone SX99NW1 Quarry with Dawlish sandstone and an excellent display of sand dune Sandpit Clyst St.Mary Sowton SX975909 SX99SE1 cross bedding Anchoring Hill Road Cutting Otterton SY088860 Sunken-lane roadside cutting of Otter sandstone. SY08NE1 Exposed deflation surface marking the junction of Budleigh Salterton Uphams Plantation Bicton SY041866 SY0W1 Pebble Beds and Otter Sandstone, with ventifacts A good exposure of Otter Sandstone showing typical sedimentary Dark Lane Budleigh Salterton SY056823 SY08SE1 features as well as eolian sandstone at the base The Maer Exmouth SY008801 Exmouth Mudstone and Sandstone Formation SY08SW1 A good example of the junction between Budleigh
    [Show full text]
  • View Our Annual Review 2017
    Annual Review 2017 1 We are one of Britain’s leading building conservation charities. With the help of supporters and grant- In 2017: making bodies we save historic buildings in danger of being lost forever. We carefully restore such 68,055 ‘Landmarks’ and offer them a new future by making guests stayed them available for self-catering holidays. The lettings in Landmarks income from the 200 extraordinary buildings in our care supports their maintenance and survival in our landscape, culture and society. 44 charities benefited from free breaks 15,087 visitors came along on open days 4,651 people donated to support our work PATRON TRUSTEES HRH The Prince of Wales Neil Mendoza, Chairman Dame Elizabeth Forgan Dr Doug Gurr DIRECTOR John Hastings-Bass At Tangy Mill in Kintyre Dr Anna Keay Charles McVeigh III Landmarkers live amongst Pete Smith the carefully preserved Martin Stancliffe FSA Dip Arch RIBA original hoisting and Sarah Staniforth CBE grinding machinery. 3 Our restoration of Purton Green, Within touching distance of the past Suffolk, in 1970-71 rescued it from the brink of ruination. A nation’s heritage not only illuminates its past but has the power to shape its future. That this charity has saved some 200 often crumbling structures has only been possible because Landmark’s supporters believe in a building’s potential. Most recently the Heritage Lottery Fund granted half of the £4.2m needed to save Llwyn Celyn, our medieval house in the Black Mountains. We are also grateful to specialist insurer, Ecclesiastical, who donated £200,000 to revive Cobham Dairy.
    [Show full text]
  • Parish/Town Area Vacant Seats Base Expenses Expenditure Electorate
    Parish/Town Area Vacant Seats Base Expenses Expenditure Electorate Total Expenditure Grand Total per Elector per Elector Abbotsbury 4 740 £0.06 346 £20.76 £760.76 Affpuddle and Turnerspuddle 9 740 £0.06 379 £22.74 £762.74 Alderholt 9 740 £0.06 2523 £151.38 £891.38 Allington 7 740 £0.06 693 £41.58 £781.58 Alton Pancras 2 740 £0.06 132 £7.92 £747.92 Anderson 1 740 £0.06 75 £4.50 £744.50 Arne 8 740 £0.06 1098 £65.88 £805.88 Ashmore 7 740 £0.06 159 £9.54 £749.54 Athelhampton 2 740 £0.06 29 £1.74 £741.74 Batcombe 2 740 £0.06 83 £4.98 £744.98 Beaminster 11 740 £0.06 2589 £155.34 £895.34 Beer Hackett 3 740 £0.06 81 £4.86 £744.86 Bere Regis 11 740 £0.06 1346 £80.76 £820.76 Bettiscombe 2 740 £0.06 50 £3.00 £743.00 Bincombe 3 740 £0.06 78 £4.68 £744.68 Bishop`s Caundle 7 740 £0.06 329 £19.74 £759.74 Blandford Badbury Heights 1 740 £0.06 906 £54.36 £794.36 Blandford Central 6 740 £0.06 3220 £193.20 £933.20 Blandford Hilltop 2 740 £0.06 731 £43.86 £783.86 Blandford Langton St Leonards 4 740 £0.06 1604 £96.24 £836.24 Blandford Old Town 3 740 £0.06 1596 £95.76 £835.76 Blandford St Mary 7 740 £0.06 1152 £69.12 £809.12 Bothenhampton - Bothenhampton 6 740 £0.06 1299 £77.94 £817.94 Bothenhampton - Walditch 3 740 £0.06 534 £32.04 £772.04 Bourton 9 740 £0.06 707 £42.42 £782.42 Bradford Abbas 7 740 £0.06 765 £45.90 £785.90 Bradford Peverell 7 740 £0.06 323 £19.38 £759.38 Bradpole - Bradpole Village 9 740 £0.06 1712 £102.72 £842.72 Bradpole - Claremont 1 740 £0.06 243 £14.58 £754.58 Bridport North 9 740 £0.06 3541 £212.46 £952.46 Bridport South 9 740 £0.06
    [Show full text]
  • Plymouth, South Hams & West Devon Local Planning Authorities' 2018, 5
    Plymouth, South Hams & West Devon Local Planning Authorities’ 2018, 5 Year Housing Land Supply Position Statement July 2019 Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 2 2. What is the 5 year land supply? ............................................................................................................ 2 3. What is the Housing Delivery Test? .................................................................................................... 3 4. National Policy & Guidance - Demonstrating a 5 Year Supply ...................................................... 9 5. JLP whole plan delivery 2014-2019 & 5 Year Housing Land Supply Position (2019 monitoring point) ........................................................................................................................................... 11 Appendices Appendix 1. MHCLG letter confirming recalculated 2018 HDT measurement for the 3 JLP authorities Appendix 2. Plymouth LPA supply over the next 5 years (2019-2024) Appendix 3 South Hams LPA supply over the next 5 years (2019-2024) Appendix 4. West Devon LPA supply over the next 5 years (2019-2024) Appendix 5. Sites removed from 5 Year Land Supply (lapsed and undeliverable consents & sites considered developable not deliverable 2019-2024) Appendix 6. Amendments to past net additional dwelling delivery due to NPPF/NPPG changes regarding counting student and communal accommodation Appendix 7. List of Small
    [Show full text]
  • 'Cherish' FINAL REPOR
    Coastal Heritage Risk – Imagery in Support of Heritage Planning and Management in South-West England ‘CHeRISH’ FINAL REPORT FOR HISTORIC ENGLAND Professor Robin McInnes, OBE, FICE, FGS, FRSA Coastal & Geotechnical Services Honeysuckle Cottage, St Lawrence Isle of Wight PO38 1UZ Document Control Grid Project name & English Heritage Reference Project 7145 – Final Report No. Author(s) and contact details Professor Robin McInnes [email protected] (01983) 854865 Origination Date 18th September 2016 Revisers Robin McInnes Date of last revision - Version 2 Final Summary of changes - Title Page Images: Top Left: ‘Axmouth Harbour, Devon’ by Edward William Cooke RA, 1858. Image Courtesy: Christie’s. Top Right: ‘Mousehole, Cornwall’ by Harold Harvey, 1939. Image Courtesy: Sotheby’s. Bottom: ‘Lyme Regis, Dorset’ by G. Hawkins, c.1830. Image Courtesy: Woolley & Wallis. The views expressed in this report are those of the author and not of any other individual or organisation. 2 Acknowledgements The author wishes to gratefully acknowledge the assistance of the following organisations and individuals with the preparation of this study:- HERITAGE ORGANISATIONS Tim Cromack, Claire Driver, Dave Hooley, Marcus Jecock, Kath Buxton, Vanessa Straker, Caroline Howarth, Charlotte Goodhart, Paul Backhouse and other officers of Historic England; Phil Dyke of The National Trust; Anna Keay and Caroline Stanford of The Landmark Trust; Charlie Courteney of Powderham Castle; Phillip Mansel and Julie Johnson of Smedmore House, Dorset; Garry Momber, Julie Satchell
    [Show full text]
  • January 2020 Appendices
    South Walks House Tel: (01305) 838336 South Walks Road Dorchester Website: www.dorsetcouncil.gov.uk DT1 1UZ Mr Trent NT Building Design Ltd 47 Wyke Road Contact: Chris Moscrop Weymouth Direct Line: 01305 838325 Email: [email protected] DT4 9QQ BROADMAYNE 04 December 2019 GRANT OF NON MATERIAL AMENDMENT Town and Country Planning Act 1990, Planning Act 2008, Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015 (DMPO) This permission does not carry any approval or consent which may be required under any enactment, byelaw, order or regulation (eg in relation to Building Regulations or the Diversion of Footpaths etc) other than Section 57 of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1990. Application No: WD/D/19/001264 Location of Development: 49 CHALKY ROAD, BROADMAYNE, DORCHESTER, DT2 8PJ Description of Development: Non Material Amendment to application WD/D/18/002624 Amendment to planning approval WD/D/18/002624 - Reconfiguration of internal layout and alterations to south facing part of extension In pursuance of their powers under the above mentioned Act, Dorset Council, HEREBY GRANT the non material amendment in accordance with the details described above. Subject to the following: 1. The scheme does involve elevational changes mainly to the rear South elevation (but also some changs to fenestration on the East and West elevations) both in terms of the appearance and the height of the South facing projection.(which is reduced). There are no other properties immediately to the south that might be affected by this change. Consequently the proposal would not impact upon the appearance of the whole building as approved.As such the proposals are acceptable as non-material amendment.
    [Show full text]
  • Black's Guide to Devonshire
    $PI|c>y » ^ EXETt R : STOI Lundrvl.^ I y. fCamelford x Ho Town 24j Tfe<n i/ lisbeard-- 9 5 =553 v 'Suuiland,ntjuUffl " < t,,, w;, #j A~ 15 g -- - •$3*^:y&« . Pui l,i<fkl-W>«? uoi- "'"/;< errtland I . V. ',,, {BabburomheBay 109 f ^Torquaylll • 4 TorBa,, x L > \ * Vj I N DEX MAP TO ACCOMPANY BLACKS GriDE T'i c Q V\ kk&et, ii £FC Sote . 77f/? numbers after the names refer to the page in GuidcBook where die- description is to be found.. Hack Edinburgh. BEQUEST OF REV. CANON SCADDING. D. D. TORONTO. 1901. BLACK'S GUIDE TO DEVONSHIRE. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from University of Toronto http://www.archive.org/details/blacksguidetodevOOedin *&,* BLACK'S GUIDE TO DEVONSHIRE TENTH EDITION miti) fffaps an* Hlustrations ^ . P, EDINBURGH ADAM AND CHARLES BLACK 1879 CLUE INDEX TO THE CHIEF PLACES IN DEVONSHIRE. For General Index see Page 285. Axniinster, 160. Hfracombe, 152. Babbicombe, 109. Kent Hole, 113. Barnstaple, 209. Kingswear, 119. Berry Pomeroy, 269. Lydford, 226. Bideford, 147. Lynmouth, 155. Bridge-water, 277. Lynton, 156. Brixham, 115. Moreton Hampstead, 250. Buckfastleigh, 263. Xewton Abbot, 270. Bude Haven, 223. Okehampton, 203. Budleigh-Salterton, 170. Paignton, 114. Chudleigh, 268. Plymouth, 121. Cock's Tor, 248. Plympton, 143. Dartmoor, 242. Saltash, 142. Dartmouth, 117. Sidmouth, 99. Dart River, 116. Tamar, River, 273. ' Dawlish, 106. Taunton, 277. Devonport, 133. Tavistock, 230. Eddystone Lighthouse, 138. Tavy, 238. Exe, The, 190. Teignmouth, 107. Exeter, 173. Tiverton, 195. Exmoor Forest, 159. Torquay, 111. Exmouth, 101. Totnes, 260. Harewood House, 233. Ugbrooke, 10P.
    [Show full text]
  • PROPOSED REDEYELOPMENT, YEOFORD YILLAGE HALL PRELTMTNARY Srre LAYOUT, SCALE 1/500TH
    PROPOSED REDEYELOPMENT, YEOFORD YILLAGE HALL PRELTMTNARY SrrE LAYOUT, SCALE 1/500TH Reference No: 14/01656/OUT Parish: Crediton Hamlets 19 TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 APPROVAL OF OUTLINE PLANNING APPLICATION Name and Address of Applicant: Name and Address of Agent: Yeoford Community Association C/o Mr N Cant Nigel Cant Planning Peppercorn Cottage Woodland Head Yeoford Crediton EX17 5HF Date Registered : 12th November 2014 Date of Permission : 7th January 2015 Proposal: Outline for the erection of 2 dwellings following demolition of former village hall Location: Village Hall Station Road Yeoford Devon Site Vicinity Grid Ref: 278216/98533 MID DEVON DISTRICT COUNCIL HEREBY GRANTS OUTLINE PLANNING PERMISSION FOR THE ABOVE DEVELOPMENT Subject to the following conditions : 1. Before any part of the development hereby permitted is begun, detailed drawings to an appropriate scale of the layout, scale and appearance of the building(s), the means of access thereto and the landscaping of the site (hereinafter called the Reserved Matters) shall be submitted to and be approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. 2. Application(s) for approval of all the Reserved Matters shall be made to the Local Planning Authority before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission. 3. The development hereby permitted shall be begun either before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission, or before the expiration of two years from the date of approval of the last of the Reserved Matters which have been approved, whichever is the later. 4. The detailed drawings required to be submitted by Condition CO1 shall include the following additional information boundary treatments, existing site levels, finished floor levels, Fixed Datum Point on highway, tree protection plan, and foul and surface water drainage.
    [Show full text]