DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Safety Recommendations Review 2013           EUROPEAN AVIATION SAFETY AGENCY SAFETY ANALYSIS and RESEARCH DEPARTMENT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Safety Recommendations Review 2013           EUROPEAN AVIATION SAFETY AGENCY SAFETY ANALYSIS and RESEARCH DEPARTMENT EUROPEAN AVIATION SAFETY AGENCY AGENCE EUROPÉENNE DE LA SÉCURITÉ AÉRIENNE EUROPÄISCHE AGENTUR FÜR FLUGSICHERHEIT Annual Safety Recommendations Review 2013 EUROPEAN AVIATION SAFETY AGENCY SAFETY ANALYSIS AND RESEARCH DEPARTMENT Designed in Luxembourg EUROPEAN AVIATION SAFETY AGENCY AGENCE EUROPÉENNE DE LA SÉCURITÉ AÉRIENNE EUROPÄISCHE AGENTUR FÜR FLUGSICHERHEIT European Aviation Safety Agency Safety Analysis and Research Department Executive Directorate 2013 Annual Safety Recommendations Review Executive summary: The Annual Safety Recommendation Review is produced by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA). This edition provides an overview of the safety recommendations that have been addressed to EASA in 2013. It also presents the replies produced during the year. This annual review aims at providing a feedback on the follow-up given to Safety Recommendations in the context of openness, transparency and accountability that characterises the European Public Administration. Apart from its safety related information character, this review is also expected to provide relevant information related to raised safety concerns, both for EASA itself, as well as its stakeholders, including the European public. © European Aviation Safety Agency, 2014. All rights reserved. Proprietary document. Printed copies are not controlled. Confirm revision status through the EASA-Internet/Intranet. 2013 Annual Safety Recommendations Review Contents PAGE 5 Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Overview of Safety Recommendations in 2013 6 2.1 Safety recommendations received in 2013............................................................................................7 2.2 Origin of the final safety recommendations received in 2013 .............................................................8 2.3 Trends of investigated occurrences giving way to safety recommendations in 2013, by categories ...........................................................................................................................................9 2.4 Thematic distribution of final recommendations received in 2013 ...................................................12 3 Final safety recommendations replied 15 3.1 Final Safety Recommendations replied in 2013 ..................................................................................16 3.2 Status of final safety recommendations replied in 2013 ....................................................................17 3.3 Concluding actions �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������18 3.4 CONCLUSIONS .......................................................................................................................................20 ANNEX A. Replies to Recommendations in 2013 21 ANNEX B. Definitions 184 ANNEX C. Safety Recommendations classification 187 CHAPTER 1 CHAPTER 2 CHAPTER 3 ANNEX A. Introduction ANNEX B. ANNEX C. © Hawker Beechcraft Corporation 2013 Annual Safety Recommendations Review Introduction PAGE 7 Introduction At European Union level, the principles governing the investigation of accidents and serious incidents are defined in Regulation (EU) No 996/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 on the investi- gation and prevention of accidents and incidents in civil aviation and repealing Directive 94/56/EC. Regulation (EU) No 996/2010 implements international standards and recommended practices as described in Annex 13 to the Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation. It sets an obligation for each Member State of the European Union (EU) to establish an independent permanent national civil aviation safety investigation authority which shall investigate accidents and serious incidents in order to improve aviation safety and pre- vent future occurrences without apportioning blame or liability. Investigation reports and the related safety rec- ommendations shall be communicated to the concerned aviation authorities for consideration and appropriate action, as needed. The Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 as amended (“the Basic Regulation”) has transferred to the EU the competence for regulating civil aviation safety in the areas of initial and continuing airworthiness, environmental certification, aircrew licensing, air operations, ATM/ANS and aerodromes. The principal objective of the Regulation is to establish and maintain a high uniform level of civil aviation safety in Europe. Results of accident investigations play an impor- tant role in achieving this objective. This is fully recognised in the preamble to the Basic Regulation stating that “Results of air accident investigations should be acted upon as a matter of urgency, in particular when they relate to defective aircraft design and/or operational matters, in order to ensure consumer confidence in air transport”. EASA assigns high priority to the follow-up of safety recommendations. and has established effective procedures to that effect. In addition, EASA publishes this annual review of the safety recommendations handled during the year, including a statistical overview of the situation. The aim of this annual safety recommendations review is twofold: • first, the review presents general statistical data of the final safety recommendations that the safety investigation authorities have addressed to EASA in 2013. It gives an overview of the work performed by EASA in the area of safety recommendations. • second, it presents the replies that EASA has given in 2013 to safety recommendations and shows the safety issues that have been managed and their follow-up. CHAPTER 1 CHAPTER 2 CHAPTER 3 Overview of Safety ANNEX A. Recommendations ANNEX B. in 2013 ANNEX C. © iStock 2013 Annual Safety Recommendations Review Overview of Safety Recommendations in 2013 PAGE 9 Overview of Safety Recommendations in 2013 2.1 Safety recommendations received in 2013 During the year 2013, 98 final Safety Recommendations (SRs) were received by EASA. These safety recommenda- tions were related to 3 studies and 43 different occurrences distributed as follows: 27 accidents, 11 serious inci- dents and 5 incidents. The total annual number of the final safety recommendations that the Agency has received until 2013 is shown in Chart 1. The number of safety recommendations varies according to aircraft operations and number of safety events. In 2009 it is observed a significant increase of incoming final safety recommendations that is kept since then. ´ Chart 1: Final Safety Recommendations per year 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 It is worth mentioning that with similar amount of safety recommendations, there have been 22% less occur- rences in 2013 but 3 more studies with respect to 2012. In Chart 2 it is depicted the amount of safety recommendations coming from different occurrence classes since 2009. 2013 Annual Safety Recommendations Review Overview of Safety Recommendations in 2013 PAGE 10 ´ Chart 2: Final Safety Recommendations (SR) by occurrence class per year 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 SR from Accidents SR from Serious Incidents SR from Incidents SR from Studies As the remit of EASA expanded, final safety recommendations related to this new remit and initially addressed to the Member States have now been transferred to EASA. Also in some exceptional cases, EASA, acting on its own initiative, has taken on board final safety recommenda- tions which, although they were not addressed to it, were found to fall within its area of activities. 2.2 Origin of the final safety recommendations received in 2013 In 2013, Safety Investigation Authorities of 17 different States addressed 98 final safety recommendations to EASA. With the exemption of 6 countries, which addressed to EASA 15 final safety recommendations accounting for 15% of the total amount (5% more than in 2012), the remaining part was issued by EASA Member States. 2013 Annual Safety Recommendations Review Overview of Safety Recommendations in 2013 PAGE 11 ´ Chart 3: Final Safety Recommendations received by EASA Member and Non Member States % EASA Members Non EASA Members % 2.3 Trends of investigated occurrences giving way to safety recommendations in 2013, by categories Drawing up a categorisation from a number of relatively limited events has to be carried out with caution. However, a distribution of the 43 occurrences addressed in 2013 to the Agency, for which safety recommenda- tions were issued, has been done. It is noted that these statistics come from the ICAO ADREP database. In chart 4, it is observed the percentage of aircraft involved in the referred occurrences by mass group. It shows similar pattern as in 2012, the mass group from 27 001kg to 272000kg (36%) and aircraft below 2 250 kg (36%) are the main participants. 2013 Annual Safety Recommendations Review Overview of Safety Recommendations in 2013 PAGE 12 ´ Chart 4: Aircraft mass group involved in the occurrences in 2013 % % 0-2 250 kg 2 251 to 5 700 kg 5 701 to 27 000 kg % 27 001 to 272 000 kg > 272 000 kg % % As shown in Chart 5, for 2013, the pattern of the distribution by type of operations changes with respect to 2012. “General Aviation” has decreased significantly from 32% to 16%, “Commercial Air Transport” has maintained the percentage and “Aerial Work” has increased from 7% to 23%. Again, there were not occurrences involving aircraft that conducted “State Flights” in 2013. ´ Chart 5: Type of operation in the occurrences in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Authors' Accepted Version: to Be Published in Antiquity Tormented
    Authors’ Accepted Version: to be published in Antiquity Tormented Alderney: archaeological investigations of the Nazi labour and concentration camp of Sylt Sturdy Colls, C.¹, Kerti, J.¹ and Colls, K.¹ ¹ Centre of Archaeology, L214 Flaxman Building, Staffordshire University, College Road, Stoke-on- Trent, ST4 2DF. Corresponding author email: [email protected] Abstract Following the evacuation of Alderney, a network of labour and SS concentration camps were built on British soil to house foreign labourers. Despite government-led investigations in 1945, knowledge concerning the history and architecture of these camps remained limited. This article reports on the findings of forensic archaeological investigations which sought to accurately map Sylt labour and concentration camp the for the first time using non-invasive methods and 3D reconstructive techniques. It also demonstrates how these findings have provided the opportunity – alongside historical sources – to examine the relationships between architecture, the landscape and the experiences of those housed there. Introduction The Nazis constructed a network of over 44,000 (concentration, extermination, labour, Prisoner of War (PoW) and transit) camps across Europe, imprisoning and murdering individuals opposed to Nazi ideologies, and those considered racially inferior (Megargee & White 2018). Information about these sites varies in part due to Nazi endeavours to destroy the evidence of their crimes (Arad 1987: 26; Gilead et al. 2010: 14; Sturdy Colls 2015: 3). Public knowledge regarding the camps that were built on British soil in the Channel Islands is particularly limited, not least of all because they were partially demolished and remain “taboo” (Carr & Sturdy Colls 2016: 1). Sylt was one of several camps built on the island of Alderney (Figures 1 & 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Holocaust Archaeology: Archaeological Approaches to Landscapes of Nazi Genocide and Persecution
    HOLOCAUST ARCHAEOLOGY: ARCHAEOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO LANDSCAPES OF NAZI GENOCIDE AND PERSECUTION BY CAROLINE STURDY COLLS A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Institute of Archaeology and Antiquity College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham September 2011 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT The landscapes and material remains of the Holocaust survive in various forms as physical reminders of the suffering and persecution of this period in European history. However, whilst clearly defined historical narratives exist, many of the archaeological remnants of these sites remain ill-defined, unrecorded and even, in some cases, unlocated. Such a situation has arisen as a result of a number of political, social, ethical and religious factors which, coupled with the scale of the crimes, has often inhibited systematic search. This thesis will outline how a non- invasive archaeological methodology has been implemented at two case study sites, with such issues at its core, thus allowing them to be addressed in terms of their scientific and historical value, whilst acknowledging their commemorative and religious significance.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts Book
    CONFERENCE BOOK TASC2 & SEISMOLOGY OF KASC9 THE SUN AND THE / Workshop SPACEINN & DISTANT STARS HELAS8 2016 /USING TODAY’S / Conference SUCCE SSES TO 11–15 July PREPARE THE Angra do Heroísmo Terceira, Açores FUTURE Portugal ORGANIZERS SPONSORS SEISMOLOGY OF THE SUN AND THE DISTANT STARS 2016 USING TODAY’S SUCCESSES TO PREPARE THE FUTURE Scientific Rationale For the last 30 years, since the meeting on Seismology of the Sun and the Distant Stars held in Cambridge, in 1985, the range of seismic data and associated science results obtained has far exceeded the expectations of the community. The continuous observation of the Sun has secured major advances in the understanding of the physics of the stellar interiors and has allowed us to build and prepare the tools to look at other stars. Several ground facilities and space missions have completed the picture by adding the necessary data to study stars across the HR diagram with a level of detail that was in no way foreseen in 1985. In spite of the great science successes, astero- and helioseismic data still contain many secrets waiting to be uncovered. The opportunity to use the existing data and tools to clarify major questions of stellar physics (mixing, rotation, convection, and magnetic activity are just a few examples) still needs to be further explored. The combination of data from different instruments and for different targets also holds the promise that further advances are indeed imminent. At the same time we also need to prepare the future, as major space missions and ground facilities are being built in order to collect more and better data to expand and consolidate the detailed seismic view of the stellar population in our galaxy.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Free Digital Flight Simulation Magazine
    Vol.2 Issue 7 June 2019 Your Free digital Flight Simulation magazine 2 Welcome once again. Summer is upon us with mixed weather but hopefully it will be fine for the Bray Air Display on 27th and 28th July. Check their website for what’s on in the air and on the ground. Flight Sim Show 2019 in Cosford, UK will be a two day event for the first time which should increase attendance. We are unsure whether we will exhibit, so keep an eye on the show website. Microsoft have announced their re-entry into the Flight Sim market with ‘Microsoft Flight Simulator’ for PC and X-Box. I don’t think it will be on par with Prepar3d as it has become very popular since its update to 64bit. However, it may mean more business for the add-on publishers. In this issue, John McNeely expresses his opinion on updates and buggy software in ‘Testing Times’. In addition to his Plane Talking column, Published by Ian Broni reports on his visit to ‘DAKS Over Normandy’. John Melville reviews The PC Pilots Ireland the Carenado A42 500 Series and Brian Church reviews the new Navigraph Charts. pcpilotsireland.com The next issue is due September 2019. Contributors Terry McGee Terry McGee [email protected] https://brayairdisplay.com Ian Broni [email protected] John Melville [email protected] John McNeely [email protected] Brian Church [email protected] Aerosoft www.aerosoft.com Simmarket www.simmarket.com Chillblast www.chillblast.com www.flightsimshow.com Contents: Page Aerosoft Advert 2 Testing Times 31 Editorial 3 Flightsim Apps 34 Front Cover 4 Plane
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Report 2008 Progress Report 2008
    Progress Report 2008 Progress Report 2008 Progress Report 2008 Responses to Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB) Safety Recommendations Responses recieved to AAIB recommendations made up to 31 December 2007, presented to the Secretary of State for Transport Progress Report 2008 Progress Report 2008 GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS © Crown Copyright 2008 aal above airfield level KTAS knots true airspeed ACAS Airborne Collision Avoidance System LAA Light Aircraft Association ACARS Automatic Communications And Reporting System lb pound(s) ADF automatic direction finding equipment LP low pressure AFIS(O) Aerodrome Flight Information Service (Officer) LDA landing distance available All rights reserved. Copies of this publication may be reproduced for personal use, or for use within a company AFRS Aerodrome Fire & Rescue Service LPC licence proficiency check or organisation, but may not otherwise be reproduced for publication. agl above ground level ltr litre(s) AIC Aeronautical Information Circular m metres amsl above mean sea level mb millibar(s) Extracts can be published without specific permission providing that the source is duly acknowledged. AOM aerodrome operating minima MDA Minimum Descent Altitude APU auxiliary power unit METAR a timed aerodrome meteorological report ASI airspeed indicator min(s) minutes ATC(C)(O) Air Traffic Control (Centre)( Officer) mm millimetre(s) ATIS Automatic Terminal Information System mph miles per hour BMAA British Microlight Aircraft Association MTWA maximum total weight authorised BGA British Gliding Association
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2007
    EU_ENTWURF_08:00_ENTWURF_01 01.04.2026 13:07 Uhr Seite 1 Analyses of the European air transport market Annual Report 2007 EUROPEAN COMMISSION EU_ENTWURF_08:00_ENTWURF_01 01.04.2026 13:07 Uhr Seite 2 Air Transport and Airport Research Annual analyses of the European air transport market Annual Report 2007 German Aerospace Center Deutsches Zentrum German Aerospace für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. Center in the Helmholtz-Association Air Transport and Airport Research December 2008 Linder Hoehe 51147 Cologne Germany Head: Prof. Dr. Johannes Reichmuth Authors: Erik Grunewald, Amir Ayazkhani, Dr. Peter Berster, Gregor Bischoff, Prof. Dr. Hansjochen Ehmer, Dr. Marc Gelhausen, Wolfgang Grimme, Michael Hepting, Hermann Keimel, Petra Kokus, Dr. Peter Meincke, Holger Pabst, Dr. Janina Scheelhaase web: http://www.dlr.de/fw Annual Report 2007 2008-12-02 Release: 2.2 Page 1 Annual analyses of the European air transport market Annual Report 2007 Document Control Information Responsible project manager: DG Energy and Transport Project task: Annual analyses of the European air transport market 2007 EC contract number: TREN/05/MD/S07.74176 Release: 2.2 Save date: 2008-12-02 Total pages: 222 Change Log Release Date Changed Pages or Chapters Comments 1.2 2008-06-20 Final Report 2.0 2008-10-10 chapters 1,2,3 Final Report - full year 2007 draft 2.1 2008-11-20 chapters 1,2,3,5 Final updated Report 2.2 2008-12-02 all Layout items Disclaimer and copyright: This report has been carried out for the Directorate-General for Energy and Transport in the European Commission and expresses the opinion of the organisation undertaking the contract TREN/05/MD/S07.74176.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on State Asset Management in the EU
    Study on State asset management in the EU Final study report for Pillar 2 – Portugal Contract: ECFIN/187/2016/740792 Written by KPMG and Bocconi University February 2018 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs Directorate Fiscal policy and policy mix and Directorate Investment, growth and structural reforms European Commission B-1049 Brussels 2 Portugal This Country fiche presents a quantitative overview of the mix of non-financial assets owned by the Portuguese General government. A recap and a summary table on sources of data and valuation methods used to map and assess (as far as possible) non-financial assets owned by the Portuguese General government is reported in the Appendix (Table C). 1. OVERVIEW OF NON-FINANCIAL ASSETS In 2015, the estimated value of Non-financial assets owned by the Portuguese General government was equal to 119.6 Eur Bn, accounting for about 82.9% of the estimated value of all assets (including Financial assets) owned by the General government1. Figure 1 General government’s Financial and Non-financial assets (Eur Bn), Portugal, 2015 Source: KPMG elaboration. Data on Gross Domestic Product were directly retrivied from Eurostat on 19th September 2017. (1) Estimated values refer to 2015 as the latest available year for both financial assets and all clusters of non-financial assets. (2) In this chart, the “estimated value” of financial assets is reported in terms of Total Assets of the country’s PSHs as weighted by the stake(s) owned by the Public sector into the PSHs themselves2. (3) Values of Dwellings, and Buildings other than dwellings were directly retrieved from Eurostat, while values for other Non-financial assets were estimated according to the valuation approaches explained in the Methodological Notes for Pillar 2.
    [Show full text]
  • January 2018 Newsletter
    BNAPS News January 2018 BNAPS News Vol 8 Iss 1 – January 2018 2018 - “Charlie November” Restoration Completion 2018 will see our historic B-N Islander G-AVCN, often referred to as “Charlie November”, emerge fully restored as a high quality static exhibit. At present the plan is to have the formal unveiling on Saturday 16 June, 2018, at BNAPS’ restoration workshop near Ryde. This will be some 53 years and 3 days after the first flight of the prototype BN-2, 50 years since Islander G-AVCN flew Aurigny Air Services inaugural passenger flight and just over 18 years since G-AVCN was repatriated to the UK from Puerto Rico. Bringing it all together for June 2018 The next few months will present even more of a challenge for the restoration team – that of bringing all the many parts of “Charlie November” together ready for its first public appearance on 16 June. In this issue of BNAPS News: Part 2 of “Flying with Britten-Norman” by Colin Newnes - Pages 13-21 50 Years of Aurigny Air Services – Pages 22-28 Wight Aviation Heritage Tours – Page 31 1 BNAPS Supporters Fund Raising Appeal - January 2018 2018 2010 2016 Dear BNAPS Supporter, All will no doubt be eagerly looking forward to seeing our historic Islander emerge as a fully assembled high quality static exhibit in 2018. This achievement will be a credit to the restoration team of volunteers that has enabled the project to go from strength to strength since the project was restarted in March 2010. Thanks go to all who have generously supported the project over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • Air France-KLM Group for the Year Ended Activity AFR 33 December 31, 2012
    Selected fi nancial information 2 Highlights of the 2012 fi nancial year AFR 4 4.6 Note on the methodology for the reporting Corporate governance AFR 5 of the environmental indicators 129 1.1 The Board of Directors 6 4.7 Environmental indicators 132 1.2 The CEO Committee 30 4.8 Statutory Auditor’s Attestation report on the social, environmental and corporate 1 1.3 The Group Executive Committee 30 citizenship information disclosed in the 2012 management report 136 4.9 Statutory Auditor’s Assurance report on a selection of environmental and social indicators of Air France-KLM group for the year ended Activity AFR 33 December 31, 2012. 137 2.1 Market and environment 34 2.2 Strategy 42 2 Activities Financial r eport 139 2.3 Passenger business 45 2.4 Cargo business 53 5.1 Investments and fi nancing 140 2.5 Maintenance business 57 5.2 Property, plant and equipment 143 2.6 Other businesses 62 5 5.3 Comments on the fi nancial statements 146 2.7 Fleet 64 5.4 Key fi nancial indicators 150 2.8 Highlights of the beginning Financial statements AFR of the 2013 fi nancial year 71 5.5 Consolidated fi nancial statements 156 5.6 Notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements 163 5.7 Statutory auditors’ report on the consolidated fi nancial statements 245 Risks and risk 5.8 Statutory fi nancial statements 247 5.9 Five-year results summary 259 management AFR 73 5.10 Statutory Auditor’s report 3.1 Risk management process 74 on the fi nancial statements 260 3 3.2 Risk factors and their management 75 5.11 Statutory Auditors’ special report on regulated agreements and commitments 261 3.3 Market risks and their management 83 3.4 Report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors on corporate governance, internal control and risk management for the 2012 fi nancial year 87 3.5 Statutory auditors’ report prepared in accordance Other information 265 with article L.225-235 of the French Commercial Code (Code de commerce) on the report prepared 6.1 History 266 by the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Air France-KLM S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of Long Distance Aircraft
    European Aviation Safety Agency Safety Analysis and Research Department Executive Directorate 2008 Annual Safety Recommendations review Executive Directorate- Safety Analysis and Research Page 1/48 © European Aviation Safety Agency, 2008. All rights reserved. Proprietary document. Printed copies are not controlled. Confirm revision status through the EASA-Internet/Intranet. European Aviation Safety Agency Annual Safety Recommendations review 2008 SAR-002-2009 2008 Annual Safety Recommendations review Document ref. Status Date SAR-002-2008 20 August 2009 Contact name and address for enquiries: European Aviation Safety Agency Safety Analysis and Research Postfach 10 12 53 50452 Köln - Germany Information on EASA is available at: www.easa.europa.eu Disclaimer: Neither the European Aviation Safety Agency, nor any person acting on behalf of the European Aviation Safety Agency is responsible for the use which might be made of the following information. Authorisation : Name Signature Date Zsofia Olah 05 March 2009 Prepared Dominique Verdoni Reviewed 1 Bernard Bourdon Reviewed 2 Authorised John Vincent Executive Directorate- Safety Analysis and Research Page 2/48 © European Aviation Safety Agency, 2008. All rights reserved. Proprietary document. Printed copies are not controlled. Confirm revision status through the EASA-Internet/Intranet. European Aviation Safety Agency Annual Safety Recommendations review 2008 SAR-002-2009 Table of Contents 1 Introduction...........................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • The Homeland Security Market 2013-2023 Aviation, Mass Transit, Maritime, Infrastructure, Cyber, CBRN, Border, CTI & Public Safety
    The Homeland Security Market 2013-2023 Aviation, Mass Transit, Maritime, Infrastructure, Cyber, CBRN, Border, CTI & Public Safety ©notice This material is copyright by visiongain. It is against the law to reproduce any of this material without the prior written agreement of vision- gain. You cannot photocopy, fax, download to database or duplicate in any other way any of the material contained in this report. Each pur- chase and single copy is for personal use only. Contents 1. Executive Summary 1.1 Global Homeland Security Market Overview 1.2 Benefits of This Report 1.3 Who is This Report For? 1.4 Methodology 1.5 Global Homeland Security Market Forecast 2013-2023 1.6 Homeland Security Submarket Forecasts 2013-2023 1.7 Leading Homeland Security National Market Forecasts 2013-2023 2. Introduction to the Global Homeland Security Market 2.1 Homeland Security - The Nature and History of the Threat 2.2 Homeland Security: The Historical and Current Response to the Threat 2.3 Defining The Homeland Security Market 2.4 Other Issues With Definition in the Global Homeland Security Market 2.5 Threats Driving the Homeland Security Market 2.5.1 Terrorism and Sabotage 2.5.2 Domestic Insurgency 2.5.3 Domestic Unrest 2.5.4 Theft and Piracy 2.5.5 Infiltration 2.5.6 Environmental Threats 3. Global Homeland Security Market 2013-2023 3.1 The Global Homeland Security Market Forecast 2013-2023 3.2 The Global Homeland Security Market Analysis 2013-2023 3.3 Global Homeland Security Drivers & Restraints 3.4 The Global Homeland Security Market Forecast 2013-2023
    [Show full text]
  • WASHINGTON AVIATION SUMMARY February 2015 EDITION
    WASHINGTON AVIATION SUMMARY February 2015 EDITION CONTENTS I. REGULATORY NEWS .............................................................................................. 1 II. AIRPORTS ................................................................................................................ 4 III. SECURITY AND DATA PRIVACY ……………………..................................................6 IV. E-COMMERCE AND TECHNOLOGY ....................................................................... 7 V. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................ 8 VI. U.S. CONGRESS ...................................................................................................... 9 VII. BILATERAL AND STATE DEPARTMENT NEWS ................................................... 11 VIII. EUROPE/AFRICA ................................................................................................... 13 IX. ASIA/PACIFIC/MIDDLE EAST ................................................................................ 15 X. AMERICAS ............................................................................................................. 18 For further information, including documents referenced, contact: Joanne W. Young Kirstein & Young PLLC 1750 K Street NW Suite 200 Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: (202) 331-3348 Fax: (202) 331-3933 Email: [email protected] http://www.yklaw.com The Kirstein & Young law firm specializes in representing U.S. and foreign airlines, airports, leasing companies, financial institutions
    [Show full text]