Communicative & Integrative Biology
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Origins of Life: Transition from Geochemistry to Biogeochemistry
December 2016 Volume 12, Number 6 ISSN 1811-5209 Origins of Life: Transition from Geochemistry to Biogeochemistry NITA SAHAI and HUSSEIN KADDOUR, Guest Editors Transition from Geochemistry to Biogeochemistry Staging Life: Warm Seltzer Ocean Incubating Life: Prebiotic Sources Foundation Stones to Life Prebiotic Metal-Organic Catalysts Protometabolism and Early Protocells pub_elements_oct16_1300&icpms_Mise en page 1 13-Sep-16 3:39 PM Page 1 Reproducibility High Resolution igh spatial H Resolution High mass The New Generation Ion Microprobe for Path-breaking Advances in Geoscience U-Pb dating in 91500 zircon, RF-plasma O- source Addressing the growing demand for small scale, high resolution, in situ isotopic measurements at high precision and productivity, CAMECA introduces the IMS 1300-HR³, successor of the internationally acclaimed IMS 1280-HR, and KLEORA which is derived from the IMS 1300-HR³ and is fully optimized for advanced U-Th-Pb mineral dating. • New high brightness RF-plasma ion source greatly improving spatial resolution, reproducibility and throughput • New automated sample loading system with motorized sample height adjustment, significantly increasing analysis precision, ease-of-use and productivity • New UV-light microscope for enhanced optical image resolution (developed by University of Wisconsin, USA) ... and more! Visit www.cameca.com or email [email protected] to request IMS 1300-HR³ and KLEORA product brochures. Laser-Ablation ICP-MS ~ now with CAMECA ~ The Attom ES provides speed and sensitivity optimized for the most demanding LA-ICP-MS applications. Corr. Pb 207-206 - U (238) Recent advances in laser ablation technology have improved signal 2SE error per sample - Pb (206) Combined samples 0.076121 +/- 0.002345 - Pb (207) to background ratios and washout times. -
Green Rust: the Simple Organizing ‘Seed’ of All Life?
life Review Green Rust: The Simple Organizing ‘Seed’ of All Life? Michael J. Russell Planetary Chemistry and Astrobiology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109-8099, USA; [email protected] Received: 6 June 2018; Accepted: 14 August 2018; Published: 27 August 2018 Abstract: Korenaga and coworkers presented evidence to suggest that the Earth’s mantle was dry and water filled the ocean to twice its present volume 4.3 billion years ago. Carbon dioxide was constantly exhaled during the mafic to ultramafic volcanic activity associated with magmatic plumes that produced the thick, dense, and relatively stable oceanic crust. In that setting, two distinct and major types of sub-marine hydrothermal vents were active: ~400 ◦C acidic springs, whose effluents bore vast quantities of iron into the ocean, and ~120 ◦C, highly alkaline, and reduced vents exhaling from the cooler, serpentinizing crust some distance from the heads of the plumes. When encountering the alkaline effluents, the iron from the plume head vents precipitated out, forming mounds likely surrounded by voluminous exhalative deposits similar to the banded iron formations known from the Archean. These mounds and the surrounding sediments, comprised micro or nano-crysts of the variable valence FeII/FeIII oxyhydroxide known as green rust. The precipitation of green rust, along with subsidiary iron sulfides and minor concentrations of nickel, cobalt, and molybdenum in the environment at the alkaline springs, may have established both the key bio-syntonic disequilibria and the means to properly make use of them—the elements needed to effect the essential inanimate-to-animate transitions that launched life. -
The Vital Question Why Is Life the Way It Is?
The Vital Question Why is life the way it is? Introduction Nick Lane Biochemist and writer About Dr Nick Lane is a British biochemist and writer. He was awarded the first Provost’s Venture Research Prize in the Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment at University College London, where he is now a Reader in Evolutionary Biochemistry. Dr Lane’s research deals with evolutionary biochemistry and bioenergetics, focusing on the origin of life and the evolution of complex cells. Dr Lane was a founding member of the UCL Consortium for Mitochondrial Research, and is leading the UCL Research Frontiers Origins of Life programme. He was awarded the 2011 BMC Research Award for Genetics, Genomics, Bioinformatics and Evolution, and the 2015 Biochemical Society Award for his sustained and diverse contribution to the molecular life sciences and the public understanding of science. The Vital Question Why is life the way it is? Introduction There is a black hole at the heart of biology. Bluntly put, we do not know why life is the way it is. All complex life on earth shares a common ancestor, a cell that arose from simple bacterial progenitors on just one occasion in 4 billion years. Was this a freak accident, or did other ‘experiments’ in the evolution of complexity fail? We don’t know. We do know that this common ancestor was already a very complex cell. It had more or less the same sophistication as one of your cells, and it passed this great complexity on not just to you and me but to all its descendants, from trees to bees. -
THE UNIVERSAL EVOLUTION and the ORIGIN of LIFE Gennady
THE UNIVERSAL EVOLUTION AND THE ORIGIN OF LIFE Gennady Shkliarevsky DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.18564.86404 Abstract: The origin of life occupies a very important place in the study of the evolution. Its liminal location between life and non-life poses special challenges to researchers who study this subject. Current approaches in studying the origin and evolution of early life are reductive: they either reduce the domain of non-life to the domain of life or vice versa. This contribution seeks to provide a perspective that would avoid reductionism of any kind. Its goal is to outline a frame that would include both domains and their respective evolutions as its particular cases. The study examines the main theoretical perspectives on the origin and evolution of early life and provides a constructive critique of these perspectives. An objective view requires viewing an object or a phenomenon from all available points of view. The goal of this contribution is not to prove the current perspectives wrong and to deny their achievements. It seeks to provide an angle that would be sufficiently wide and would allow synthesizing current perspectives for a comprehensive and objective interpretation of the origin and evolution of early life. In other words, it seeks to outline a frame for an objective view that will help understand life’s place within the universe. Key words: origin of life, prokaryotes, eukaryotes, multicellular life, process of creation, evolution, conservation, and levels of organization. Introduction Life is perhaps the most intimately familiar experience that all humans have. It begins even before we are born. -
Introduction: Why Is Life the Way It Is?
INTRODUCTION: WHY IS LIFE THE WAY IT IS? here is a black hole at the heart of biology. Bluntly put, we do not Tknow why life is the way it is. All complex life on earth shares a common ancestor, a cell that arose from simple bacterial progenitors on just one occasion in 4 billion years. Was this a freak accident, or did other ‘experiments’ in the evolution of complexity fail? We don’t know. We do know that this common ancestor was already a very complex cell. It had more or less the same sophistication as one of your cells, and it passed this great complexity on not just to you and me but to all its descendants, from trees to bees. I challenge you to look at one of your own cells down a micro- scope and distinguish it from the cells of a mushroom. They are practically identical. I don’t live much like a mushroom, so why are my cells so similar? It’s not just that they look alike. All complex life shares an astonishing cata- logue of elaborate traits, from sex to cell suicide to senescence, none of which is seen in a comparable form in bacteria. There is no agreement about why so many unique traits accumulated in that single ancestor, or why none of them shows any sign of evolving independently in bacteria. Why, if all of these traits arose by natural selection, in which each step offers some small advantage, did equivalent traits not arise on other occasions in various bacterial groups? These questions highlight the peculiar evolutionary trajectory of life on earth. -
What Are the Principles That Govern Life?
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 3 July 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202007.0014.v1 Peer-reviewed version available at Communicative & Integrative Biology 2020, 13, 97-107; doi:10.1080/19420889.2020.1803591 What are the principles that govern life? by Jaime Gómez-Márquez Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biology - CIBUS, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT We know that living matter must behave in accordance with the universal laws of physics and chemistry. However, these laws are insufficient to explain the specific characteristics of the vital phenomenon and, therefore, we need new principles, intrinsic to biology, which are the basis for developing a theoretical framework for understanding life. Here I propose what I call the seven commandments of life (the Vital Order, the Principle of Inexorability, the Central Dogma, the Tyranny of Time, the Evolutionary Imperative, the Conservative Rule, the Cooperating Thrust) as a set of principles that help us explain the vital phenomenon from an evolutionary perspective. In a metaphorical way, we can consider life like an endless race in which living beings are the runners, who are changing as the race goes on (the evolutionary process), and the commandments the rules. Keywords: life rules, vital determinism, evolution, cooperativity, central dogma 1 © 2020 by the author(s). Distributed under a Creative Commons CC BY license. Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 3 July 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202007.0014.v1 Peer-reviewed version available at Communicative & Integrative Biology 2020, 13, 97-107; doi:10.1080/19420889.2020.1803591 Introduction In the last two centuries there has been enormous scientific progress in the understanding of biological processes. -
Evaluating Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Unfolded Protein Response Through the Lens of Ecology and Evolution
Biol. Rev. (2021), 96, pp. 541–556. 541 doi: 10.1111/brv.12667 Evaluating endoplasmic reticulum stress and unfolded protein response through the lens of ecology and evolution Kang Nian Yap1* , KayLene Yamada1, Shelby Zikeli1, Hippokratis Kiaris2 and Wendy R. Hood1 1Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, 101 Rouse Life Science Building, Auburn, AL, 36849, U.S.A. 2Department of Drug Discovery and Biomedical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, and Peromyscus Genetic Stock Center, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, U.S.A. ABSTRACT Considerable progress has been made in understanding the physiological basis for variation in the life-history patterns of animals, particularly with regard to the roles of oxidative stress and hormonal regulation. However, an underappreciated and understudied area that could play a role in mediating inter- and intraspecific variation of life history is endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, and the resulting unfolded protein response (UPRER). ER stress response and the UPRER maintain proteostasis in cells by reducing the intracellular load of secretory proteins and enhancing protein folding capacity or ini- tiating apoptosis in cells that cannot recover. Proper modulation of the ER stress response and execution of the UPRER allow animals to respond to intracellular and extracellular stressors and adapt to constantly changing environments. ER stress responses are heritable and there is considerable individual variation in UPRER phenotype in animals, suggesting that ER stress and UPRER phenotype can be subjected to natural selection. The variation in UPRER phenotype presum- ably reflects the way animals respond to ER stress and environmental challenges. Most of what we know about ER stress and the UPRER in animals has either come from biomedical studies using cell culture or from experiments involving con- ventional laboratory or agriculturally important models that exhibit limited genetic diversity. -
Teleology and the Origin of Evolution Sy Garte Sy Garte
Article Teleology and the Origin of Evolution Sy Garte Sy Garte Darwinian evolution is not synonymous with change; it is a uniquely biological pro- cess. The biochemical mechanism of evolution is distinct from the observations made by Darwin on hereditable variation and natural selection. The key to biological evo- lution is a tight linkage between inheritable genotype and gene-directed phenotype, which allows the phenotype to be the target of selection. It is theoretically possible for some forms of life to exist without evolution; thus, the origin of life and the origin of evolution are two separate research questions. The classical problem of teleology in biol- ogy may be approached by a close examination of the mechanism behind the universal genotype-phenotype linkage: the protein synthesis or translation system. This solution to the problem of converting nucleic acid chemistry into protein chemistry may be the fundamental root of teleonomy and inherent teleology in living organisms. f we believe that God created life to teleology is contrary to the very fabric of evolve to humans as image bearers,1 Darwinism. then we can think of God’s will to I However, there are indications that evo- have living animals capable and desir- ous of a relationship with him as the lutionary biology itself is moving toward fi nal cause of evolution. However, some a far more complex view of how biologi- 2 Christian thinkers, both currently and in cal variation is produced, and a good the past, have found it diffi cult to recon- deal of evidence has shown that there cile Darwin’s theory of evolution with are, very likely, suffi cient constraints on the theological view that God created our evolutionary developments to allow for 3 universe and all life purposefully. -
An Improbable Journey Adrian Woolfson Enjoys Two Studies on Microbial Life’S Trek Towards Complexity
ORIGINS OF LIFE An improbable journey Adrian Woolfson enjoys two studies on microbial life’s trek towards complexity. n 1676, the Dutch merchant and amateur rise to bacteria and archaea, which have no The Vital Question: Why is Life the Way it is? scientist Antoni van Leeuwenhoek sub- nucleus or other sub-cellular organelles. NICK LANE mitted an essay to the Royal Society of The evolutionary engine of life then seems Profile: 2015. ILondon detailing a singular discovery. This to have got stuck, idling along at the unicel- Life’s Engines: How Microbes Made Earth was the world of unicellular organisms, lular level for another 2 billion to 3 billion Habitable which he observed using a self-designed years. Falkowski explains how unicellu- PAUL G. FALKOWSKI microscope. Three hundred years later, lar organisms, although morphologically Princeton Univ. Press: 2015. Leeuwenhoek’s “animalcules” were shown challenged, managed to perfect the basic to hold the secret to the evolution of complex biochemical ‘engines’ that would power all ancestral archaean host engulfed a small life on Earth. forms of life on Earth. According to Lane, population of symbiotic bacteria, resulting In his imaginative and beautifully written the stagnation occurred because the molec- in the first eukaryotic cell, the forebear of The Vital Question, evolutionary biochem- ular motors that drive the biochemistry of complex life. ist Nick Lane defines a genealogy that links bacteria and archaea were unable to cross Lane recounts how over time, the engulfed the descendants of the Cambrian explosion the energetic threshold necessary for the bacteria jettisoned most of their genes that — the first appearance of morphologically evolution of complex form.