DOCSLIB.ORG

Volume One Watershed Characteristics Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Volume One Watershed Characteristics Report Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed it is the only thing that ever has. Margaret Mead ABOUT THIS VOLUME This is Volume One of the Watershed Management Plan, “Watershed Characteristics Report,” a product of the Santa Clara Basin Watershed Management Initiative. It is the first volume of a planned four comprising the Watershed Management Plan for the Santa Clara Basin. It condenses a larger and much more detailed report, which is referenced throughout this volume as “Volume One Unabridged.” Chapter numbers and major sections in this report correspond to those in the unabridged version. Those who need or want the much greater detail found in Volume One Unabridged should contact the Project Coordinator for the Watershed Management Initiative at the address below. We would like to hear from our readers The Watershed Management Initiative values community participation and welcomes your feedback for consideration in future publications. If you would like to comment on this document, or are interested in playing a part in managing our watershed, send in the response card at the back of this report or contact: Project Coordinator for the Watershed Management Initiative c/o City of San Jose 4245 Zanker Road San Jose, CA 95134, 408-945-3024 Visit our Web site: www.scbwmi.org i Watershed Management Plan Volume One Watershed Characteristics Report Prepared by the Santa Clara Basin Watershed Management Initiative May 2000 ii Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction ..............................................................................................1 1.1 Santa Clara Basin Watershed Management Initiative ................................1 Purpose.......................................................................................................................... 1 Goals of the Watershed Management Initiative ............................................................ 2 1.2 Location and Characteristics of the Santa Clara Basin.............................3 General Characteristics.................................................................................................. 3 Watersheds .................................................................................................................... 3 Chapter 2 Report Preparation Process....................................................................8 Chapter 3 Cultural Setting of the Santa Clara Basin ............................................11 3.1 Summary of Santa Clara Basin Cultural History.......................................11 Native Americans........................................................................................................ 11 Spanish and Mexican Periods ..................................................................................... 12 California Gold Rush Era............................................................................................ 12 The Twentieth Century................................................................................................ 13 Silicon Valley.............................................................................................................. 13 3.2 Demographic and Cultural Inventory.........................................................14 Existing Community Characteristics........................................................................... 14 Projected Community Characteristics......................................................................... 17 Chapter 4 Land Use in the Santa Clara Basin.......................................................19 4.1 Effects of Land Use on Watersheds ..........................................................19 Overview: Spatial Pattern Matters .............................................................................. 19 Effects of Urbanization on Santa Clara Basin Watersheds ......................................... 20 Opportunities to Change Land Use and Development Patterns .................................. 22 Methods for Reducing Impacts from Developed Sites................................................ 23 Summary ..................................................................................................................... 24 iii Table of Contents 4.2 Patterns of Land Use...................................................................................24 Existing Land Use ....................................................................................................... 24 Projected Growth by Watersheds ................................................................................ 31 4.3 Analysis of Land Use, Other Special Features in Riparian Corridors ....31 Methods....................................................................................................................... 36 Results .........................................................................................................................36 Discussion ................................................................................................................... 36 Chapter 5 Organizational Setting...........................................................................37 5.1 Environmental Organizations.....................................................................37 5.2 Environmental Education Resources........................................................39 5.3 San Francisco Bay Estuary-Wide Organizations......................................40 5.4 Universities and Colleges...........................................................................41 5.5 Business and Industry Trade Organizations ............................................41 5.6 Community Organizations and Foundations ............................................42 5.7 Water Sport and Recreation Groups .........................................................43 5.8 Agricultural Organizations .........................................................................44 5.9 Government Agencies ................................................................................44 5.10 Media ............................................................................................................45 Chapter 6 Regulatory Setting .................................................................................59 6.1 Regulation of Water Quality .......................................................................48 Federal Laws and Regulations..................................................................................... 49 California Laws to Protect Water Quality................................................................... 52 Implementing Agencies............................................................................................... 53 Beneficial Uses............................................................................................................ 53 6.2 Regulation of Drinking Water Quality........................................................56 Laws and Regulations ................................................................................................. 56 Implementing Agencies............................................................................................... 57 6.3 Regulation of Water Rights ........................................................................58 Laws and Regulations ................................................................................................. 58 Implementing Agencies............................................................................................... 58 iv Table of Contents 6.4 Regulation of Wetlands and Riparian Zones ............................................59 Laws and Regulations ................................................................................................. 59 Implementing Agencies............................................................................................... 60 6.5 Regulation of Endangered Species ...........................................................60 Laws and Regulations ................................................................................................. 60 Implementing Agencies............................................................................................... 62 6.6 Regulation of Fisheries...............................................................................63 Laws and Regulations ................................................................................................. 63 6.7 Regulation of Land Use ..............................................................................63 California Environmental Quality Act ........................................................................ 74 Basin-Wide Planning (General Plans)......................................................................... 63 Local Planning Policies............................................................................................... 64 6.8 Regulation of Transportation .....................................................................64 Laws and Regulations ................................................................................................. 64 Implementing Agencies............................................................................................... 65 6.9 Regulation of Vector Control (Mosquito Abatement) ...............................65 6.10 Regulation of Pesticides.............................................................................65 Federal Regulation of Pesticides ................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Flood Insurance?
    Safe, Clean Water and Natural Flood Protection Program The passage of the Safe, Clean Water and Natural Flood Protection Program in 2012 has made the community’s long term goals for protecting the future of the Santa Clara Valley possible, including: • Supplying safe, healthy water • Retrofitting dams and critical infrastructure for earthquakes • Reducing toxins, hazards and contaminants • Restoring wildlife habitat in our waterways • Providing natural flood protection Even though we are in a drought, flooding can happen. Santa Clara County has had several damaging floods over the years, Extreme dry conditions can harden the ground. Within the first few most notably in 1995 and 1997 along the Guadalupe River and 1998 days of heavy rain, the ground can deflect water into streams and along Coyote and San Francisquito creeks. Call your city’s floodplain creeks, increasing the chances of flash flooding. It can strike quickly manager or the Santa Clara Valley Water District’s Community with little or no warning. Projects Unit at 408.630.2650 to determine if you are in a floodplain. Floodwater can flow swiftly through neighborhoods and away from The water district’s flood prevention and flood awareness outreach streams when creeks “overbank” or flood. Dangerously fast-moving efforts reduce flood insurance rates by as much as 10 percent. FEMA’s floodwaters can flow thousands of feet away from the flooded creek National Flood Insurance Program Community Rating System (CRS) within minutes. evaluates the flood protection efforts that CRS communities make and provides a rating. While the chances may seem slim for a 1 percent flood* to occur, the real odds of a 1 percent flood are greater than one in four during the In our area, *participating CRS communities (noted on the magnet) earn length of a 30-year mortgage.
    [Show full text]
  • Dam Removal Planning in the California Coast Ranges by Clare
    The Big Five: Dam Removal Planning in the California Coast Ranges by Clare Kathryn O’Reilly A thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Landscape Architecture in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor G. Mathias Kondolf, Chair Professor Randolph T. Hester Professor Emeritus Robert Twiss Spring 2010 The thesis of Clare Kathryn O’Reilly, titled The Big Five: Dam Removal Planning in the California Coast Ranges, is approved: Chair Date: Professor G. Mathias Kondolf Date: Professor Randolph T. Hester Date: Professor Emeritus Robert Twiss University of California, Berkeley Spring 2010 The Big Five: Dam Removal Planning in the California Coast Ranges Copyright 2010 by Clare O’Reilly Table of Contents CHAPTER 1: Introduction 1 CHAPTER 2: Methods 18 CHAPTER 3: Conceptual Framework 22 CHAPTER 4: Case Studies 46 Upper York Creek Dam 47 Searsville Dam 58 San Clemente Dam 72 Matilija Dam 84 Rindge Dam 99 CHAPTER 5: Synthesis & Recommendations 108 REFERENCES 124 APPENDICES 136 table OF COnTEnTS i List of Figures CHAPTER 1 Figure 1-1. Sediment deposition from upstream watershed (left) and resulting deposition in reservoir. 2 Figure 1-2. Transport impact of dams. (Wildman, 2006) 3 Figure 1-3. Dams in the US by height. (USACE, 2009) 3 Figure 1-4. Dams in the US by hazard potential. (USACE, 2009) 3 Figure 1-5. Delta deposition in reservoir. (Mahmood, 1987) 5 Figure 1-6. Example of reservoir sediment deposit. 5 Figure 1-7. Infilled reservoir. (Morris & Fan, 1998) 5 Figure 1-8. Bar-lin Dam on the Dahan River in Taiwan, full of sediment in 2006 four years after completion (left), and post-failure in 2007 (right).
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Electric Vehicle Outreach and Marketing Plan
    Regional Electric Vehicle Outreach and Marketing Plan Driving to Net Zero Submitted to: Santa Clara County County of Santa Clara Office of Sustainability Submitted by: ICF FUNDED THROUGH A GRANT AWARDED BY THE CALIFORNIA MARCH 9, 2018 STRATEGIC GROWTH COUNCIL Driving to Net Zero: Outreach Campaign Acknowledgements The work upon which this publication is based was funded in whole or in part through a grant awarded by the California Strategic Growth Council. Santa Clara County would like to acknowledge the cities of Cupertino, Morgan Hill, Mountain View, Palo Alto, San Jose, and Sunnyvale for their contributions and support as partners in the Driving to Net Zero Project. Disclaimer The statements and conclusions of this report are those of the County of Santa Clara and/or ICF and not necessarily those of the California Strategic Growth Council or of the California Department of Conservation, or its employees. The California Strategic Growth Council and the California Department of Conservation make no warranties, express or implied, and assume no liability for the information contained in the succeeding text. 2 Driving to Net Zero: Outreach Campaign Table of Contents I. Setting the Stage ............................................................................................................................. 4 II. The Goal ........................................................................................................................................... 5 III. The Audience ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California
    1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California Prepared for: Premia Capital, LLC 801 Hamilton Street Redwood City, CA Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. January 18, 2019 1180 MAIN STREET PROJECT, CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY AND EVALUATION REPORT, REDWOOD CITY, SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA This document entitled 1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California was prepared by Stantec Inc. (“Stantec”) for the account of Premia Capital, LLC (the “Client”). Any reliance on this document by any third party is strictly prohibited. The material in it reflects Stantec’s professional judgment in light of the scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document and in the contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into account any subsequent changes. In preparing the document, Stantec did not verify information supplied to it by others. Any use which a third party makes of this document is the responsibility of such third party. Such third party agrees that Stantec shall not be responsible for costs or damages of any kind, if any, suffered by it or any other third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this document. Prepared by (signature) Joanne Grant, Archaeologist, MA, RPA Reviewed by (signature) John A. Nadolski, M.A. Approved
    [Show full text]
  • JUNTOS Initiative
    7/9/2020 Print/Preview Powered by ZoomGrants™ Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority 2020 Urban Grant Program Deadline: 7/1/2020 Santa Clara County Public Health Department JUNTOS Initiative Jump to: Project Description Documents Upload $ 199,955.00 Requested Santa Clara County Public Health Department Submitted: 6/30/2020 11:43:58 AM Telephone408-817-6881 (Pacific) 1775 Story Road, Suite 120 Fax 408-251-4014 San Jose, CA 95122 Web www.sccphd.org Project Contact EIN 94-6000533 Michelle Wexler Senior Health Care Program [email protected] Manager Tel: 408-817-6881 Bonnie Broderick [email protected] Additional Contacts none entered Project Description top Applicant Type 1. What type of organization is this? ✔ Public Agency School or School District 501(c)3 Nonprofit Eligible organization acting as Fiscal Sponsor for another organization 2. Does the application include a fiscal sponsor? If the project includes a fiscal sponsor, the fiscal sponsor must be the applicant. YES ✔ NO Overview https://www.zoomgrants.com/printprop.asp?rfpidu=EAFEEA1775E740ADA668DE61AB8BC94A&propidu=1827D0E2B10C428BBA75DF3417C12D24 1/13 7/9/2020 Print/Preview 3. Which type of grant are you requesting? Small ($10,000 - $39,999) ✔ Large ($40,000 - $250,000) 4. Grant category (check all that apply) Environmental Stewardship and Restoration Parks, Trails, and Public Access ✔ Environmental Education ✔ Urban Agriculture / Food Systems 5. Type of project (check all that apply) Capital improvement (Large projects only) Planning ✔ Program 6. Project Location: Address / Neighborhood What is the physical location of the project? If there is no physical location, please enter "N/A." If the project will be in multiple locations, please list all.
    [Show full text]
  • Do No R Resource G Uide
    H Reaching for the Stars… Continuing the Legacy www.csecc.org “You have the opportunity to brighten lives with your generosity to your favorite charities. Join Maria and me and become someone's star by participating in the 2008 California State Employees Charitable Campaign.” donor resource guide resource donor A RN OLD S CHWARZENEGGER Governor of California 2008 California State Employees Charitable Campaign Chair H H Chair’s Message H Dear Fellow State Employees, It is a big thrill to be back as chairman of the 2008 California State Employees Charitable Campaign. I enjoyed last year’s campaign so much that I couldn’t wait to get started again. Together, we raised $8.7 million for our favorite charities. I am proud to say this was the most we’ve ever raised and the biggest annual increase in the history of the campaign. It was truly a fantastic year, and working with so many wonderful and compassionate volunteers was a tremendous inspiration. In fact, my belief that Californians are the most generous people in the world is stronger than ever, and I know that we can set the bar even higher this year. Thank you for all of your great work, and I look forward to another record-breaking campaign. Arnold Schwarzenegger Governor 2008 CSECC Chair 2 H California State Employees Charitable Campaign H Table of Contents H United Way Organizations (PCFDs) .....................9 America’s Charities ........................................................... 33 Arrowhead United Way ........................................................ 9 Animal Charities of America .............................................. 34 United Way of the Bay Area ................................................. 9 Arts Council Silicon Valley ..................................................35 United Way of Butte & Glenn Counties ................................12 Asian Pacific Community Fund of Southern California ..........35 United Way California Capital Region ..................................13 Bay Area Black United Fund, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Coast
    Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Consultation History......................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Proposed Action ............................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Action Area ..................................................................................................................... 32 2. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT: BIOLOGICAL OPINION AND INCIDENTAL TAKE STATEMENT ......................................................................................................... 34 2.1 Analytical Approach ....................................................................................................... 34 2.2 Life History and Range-wide Status of the Species and Critical Habitat ...................... 35 2.3 Environmental Baseline .................................................................................................. 48 2.4 Effects of the Action ........................................................................................................ 62 2.5 Cumulative Effects .......................................................................................................... 76 2.6 Integration and Synthesis ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Who Pays Soundexchange: Q1 - Q3 2017
    Payments received through 09/30/2017 Who Pays SoundExchange: Q1 - Q3 2017 Entity Name License Type ACTIVAIRE.COM BES AMBIANCERADIO.COM BES AURA MULTIMEDIA CORPORATION BES CLOUDCOVERMUSIC.COM BES COROHEALTH.COM BES CUSTOMCHANNELS.NET (BES) BES DMX MUSIC BES ELEVATEDMUSICSERVICES.COM BES GRAYV.COM BES INSTOREAUDIONETWORK.COM BES IT'S NEVER 2 LATE BES JUKEBOXY BES MANAGEDMEDIA.COM BES MEDIATRENDS.BIZ BES MIXHITS.COM BES MTI Digital Inc - MTIDIGITAL.BIZ BES MUSIC CHOICE BES MUSIC MAESTRO BES MUZAK.COM BES PRIVATE LABEL RADIO BES RFC MEDIA - BES BES RISE RADIO BES ROCKBOT, INC. BES SIRIUS XM RADIO, INC BES SOUND-MACHINE.COM BES STARTLE INTERNATIONAL INC. BES Stingray Business BES Stingray Music USA BES STORESTREAMS.COM BES STUDIOSTREAM.COM BES TARGET MEDIA CENTRAL INC BES Thales InFlyt Experience BES UMIXMEDIA.COM BES SIRIUS XM RADIO, INC CABSAT Stingray Music USA CABSAT MUSIC CHOICE PES MUZAK.COM PES SIRIUS XM RADIO, INC SDARS 181.FM Webcasting 3ABNRADIO (Christian Music) Webcasting 3ABNRADIO (Religious) Webcasting 8TRACKS.COM Webcasting 903 NETWORK RADIO Webcasting A-1 COMMUNICATIONS Webcasting ABERCROMBIE.COM Webcasting ABUNDANT RADIO Webcasting ACAVILLE.COM Webcasting *SoundExchange accepts and distributes payments without confirming eligibility or compliance under Sections 112 or 114 of the Copyright Act, and it does not waive the rights of artists or copyright owners that receive such payments. Payments received through 09/30/2017 ACCURADIO.COM Webcasting ACRN.COM Webcasting AD ASTRA RADIO Webcasting ADAMS RADIO GROUP Webcasting ADDICTEDTORADIO.COM Webcasting ADORATION Webcasting AGM BAKERSFIELD Webcasting AGM CALIFORNIA - SAN LUIS OBISPO Webcasting AGM NEVADA, LLC Webcasting AGM SANTA MARIA, L.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2020 News
    Spring 2020 News We are Different. We are Able. Mission CAA provides an equitable collegiate experience to adults with special needs who historically have not had access to college education. Students Bernard and Frank in our new computer lab Vision CAA Classes go online during Shelter in Place Empowering the student body When the shelter in place mandate was put in with Joint Venture Silicon Valley to secure to creatively transform the way place March 2020 there was one week left in the community volunteers to help CAA students the world views individuals quarter. In the last week of the Winter Quarter, and families with their new distance learning with disabilities. CAA creates CAA transitioned to a fully online learning equipment. successful contributing citizens platform, and we have Michael Reisman, Director through the arts. CAA student ambassador Oliver M. was able to of the School of Science and Technology, and Dr. give Mayor Sam Liccardo a CAA Visionary Award Motto Pamela Lindsay, Dean of Instruction, to thank. the day the Mayor Zoomed in to be interviewed by Showcase Ability! They worked tirelessly researching Zoom and the CAA podcasting class. establish links that the students would use. They Founders Executive Board also wrote and published instructions for accessing CAA extends to the entire community heartfelt Dr. Pamela Lindsay, EdD/CI Ali Barekat each of the 58 courses. thanks for your support and goodwill during these DeAnna Pursai, Exec. Dir. Reverend David Bird times. Communication, teamwork, and a steadfast Board of Directors David Cross Spring Quarter resumed on Monday, April 6. CAA desire to give adults of all abilities a chance to Leann Cherkasky-Makhni Piero Dusa welcomed ten new students.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum CAPITAL of SILICON VALLEY
    NSE AGENDA: 04/14/16 ITEM: d(5) CITY OF ~ SAN JOSE Memorandum CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY TO: NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES FROM: Angel Rios, Jr. AND EDUCATION COMMITTEE SUBJECT: PLACEMAKING IN SAN JOSI~ DATE: March 28, 2016 Approved Date COUNCIL DISTRICT: Citywide RECOMMENDATION Accept the Parks, Recreation and Neighborhood Services (PRNS) report on Placemaking achievements and opportunities within the City of San OUTCOME The vision of PRNS is to be a national leader in parks and recreation in cultivating healthy communities through quality programs and dynamic public spaces. Public spaces help define the character of our city, build civic pride, and encourage social connection. Developing, activating, and maintaining public spaces creates mutual stewardship of place within the community, encouraging residents to come out to play and have fun. The Department is focused on "building community through fun" and the placemaking activities are an excellent way to accomplish this. BACKGROUND The mission of PRNS is to build healthy communities through people, parks, and programs. One of the department’s focuses is the development, activation, and maintenance of spaces that encourage community building and engage communities to come out and play. With over 187 neighborhood parks, nine regional parks, over 57 miles of trail, 18 community gardens and 51 community centers, PRNS plays a prominent role in promoting and fostering healthy, active and social lifestyles, making San Jos6 the place to be. NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES AND EDUCATION COMMITTEE March 28, 2016 Subject: Placemaking in San Jos~ Page 2 The concept of a community-based approach to planning began in the 1960s when writers like Jane Jacob.s and William H.
    [Show full text]
  • 203287 Cov Final Vol 1.Ai
    Summary Summary SUMMARY Sections Figures Tables S.1 Introduction and Purpose of S.1 Overview of SFPUC Regional S.1 WSIP Goals and Objectives the PEIR System and Water Supply Watersheds S.2 WSIP Facility Improvement S.2 Program Description Projects S.2 SFPUC Water Service Area – S.3 Environmental Effects San Francisco and SFPUC S.3 Summary of WSIP Facility Construction and Operation S.4 Areas of Controversy and Wholesale Customers Impacts Issues to be Resolved S.3 Annual Average Historical and S.4 Summary of Facility Mitigation S.5 Required Actions and Projected Customer Purchase Measures by Impact Approvals Requests S.5 Summary of Water Supply Impacts S.6 WSIP Variants S.4 WSIP Water Supply Sources, Nondrought Years and Mitigation Measures – S.7 Alternatives to the Proposed Tuolumne River System and Program S.5 WSIP Water Supply Sources, Downstream Water Bodies Drought Years S.6 Summary of Water Supply Impacts S.6a Location of WSIP Facility and Mitigation Measures – Improvement Projects – Sunol Alameda Creek Watershed Valley, Bay Division, Peninsula, and San Francisco Regions S.7 Summary of Water Supply Impacts and Mitigation Measures – S.6b Location of WSIP Facility Peninsula Watersheds Improvement Projects – San Joaquin Region S.8 Summary of Water Supply Impacts and Mitigation Measures – S.6c Location of WSIP Facility Westside Groundwater Basin Improvement Projects – Hetch Hetchy Region S.9 Summary of Water Supply Impacts and Mitigation Measures – S.7 Preliminary WSIP Construction Cumulative Water Supply Schedule S.1 Introduction and Purpose of the PEIR (Chapter 1) The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) proposes to adopt and implement the Water System Improvement Program (WSIP or proposed program) to increase the reliability of the regional water system that serves 2.4 million people in San Francisco and the San Francisco Bay Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Cunningham Park Regional Park 8 4 183.25 Alum Rock Park 15350 Penitencia Creek Rd
    Developed Council Park Area (in Name Address Park Type District District acres) Lake Cunningham Park Regional Park 8 4 183.25 Alum Rock Park 15350 Penitencia Creek Rd. Regional Park 4 6 77.5 Kelley Park Regional Park 7 7 47.44 Kelley Park - Happy Hollow Park and Zoo Regional Park 7 7 41.57 Penitencia Creek Park Neighborhood Park 4 8 36.65 Emma Prusch Farm Park Regional Park 5 6 36.41 Cataldi Park Neighborhood Park 4 8 33.97 Overfelt Gardens Regional Park 5 6 32.04 Almaden Lake Park 6099 Winfield Blvd Regional Park 10 1 30.4 Guadalupe Gardens Regional Park 3 5 27.23 Watson Park Neighborhood Park 3 5 22.32 Municipal Baseball Stadium Sports Facility 7 7 19.22 Edenvale Garden Park Regional Park 2 2 18.76 Jeffery Fontana Park Neighborhood Park 10 1 18.05 T.J. Martin Park Neighborhood Park 10 1 15.75 Calabazas Park Neighborhood Park 1 3 15.12 Arcadia Ballpark Regional Park 8 4 15.08 P.A.L. Stadium Park Sports Facility 5 6 14.28 Hillview Park Neighborhood Park 5 6 14.04 Willow Street Frank Bramhall Park Neighborhood Park 6 3 13.63 Roosevelt Park Neighborhood Park 3 5 13.62 Flickinger Park Neighborhood Park 4 8 13.53 La Colina Park Neighborhood Park 2 1 12.58 Houge Park Neighborhood Park 9 3 12.22 Evergreen Park Neighborhood Park 8 4 12.1 Capitol Park Neighborhood Park 5 6 11.91 Los Paseos Park Neighborhood Park 2 1 11.8 Fowler Creek Park Neighborhood Park 8 4 11.68 Great Oaks Park Neighborhood Park 2 2 11.54 Groesbeck Hill Park Neighborhood Park 8 4 11.46 John Mise Park Neighborhood Park 1 3 11.45 Backesto Park 13th Street and Empire Street
    [Show full text]