DOCSLIB.ORG

Thomsonspencer.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Thomsonspencer.Pdf r*o ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE EDITED BY J. REYNOLDS GREEN, D.Sc. HERBERT SPENCER ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE E^DITKD BY DR J. REYNOLDS GREEN. With Photogravure Frontispiece. Small Cr. 8vo, vs. 6d. net per vol. PRIESTLEY. By Dr THORPE, C.B., F.R.S. FLOWER. By Prof. R. LYDEK- KER, F.R.S. HUXLEY. By Prof. AINSWORTH DAVIS. BENTHAM. By B. DAYDON JACKSON, F.L.S. DALTON. /. M. DENT &> CO. All Rights Reserved J. ARTHUR THOMSON, M.A. REGIUS PROFESSOR OF NATURAL HISTORY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN- AUTHOR OF THE STUDY OF ANIMAL LIFE ; THE SCIENCE OF LIFE OUTLINES J OF ZOOLOGY ; PROGRESS OF SCIENCE ; ETC. ETC. PUBLISHED IN LONDON BY J. M. DENT & CO. AND IN NEW YORK BY E. P. DUTTON & CO. i 906 B V & A V -a O C, 99.^776 CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION ..... vii CHAP. I. HEREDITY i II. NURTURE ..... 7 III. PERIOD OF PRACTICAL WORK . 17 IV. PREPARATION FOR LIFE-WORK . 27 V. THINKING OUT THE SYNTHETIC PHILOSOPHY 37 VI. CHARACTERISTICS: PHYSICAL AND INTELLECTUAL 52 VII. CHARACTERISTICS : EMOTIONAL AND ETHICAL 74 VIII. SPENCER AS BIOLOGIST : THE DATA OF BIOLOGY . 93 IX. SPENCER AS BIOLOGIST : INDUCTIONS OF BIOLOGY . 1 1 o .XC^C. SPENCER AS CHAMPION OF THE EVOLUTION- IDEA . 135 XI. As REGARDS HEREDITY . .154 -All. FACTORS OF ORGANIC EVOLUTION . .180 XIII. EVOLUTION UNIVERSAL . 209 XIV. PSYCHOLOGICAL .... 232 XV. SOCIOLOGICAL .... 242 XVI. THE POPULATION QUESTION . .259 XVII. BEYOND SCIENCE .... 269 .-7 CONCLUSION .... 278 INDEX ..... 283 INTRODUCTION THIS volume attempts to give a short account of Herbert Spencer s life, an appreciation of his char acteristics, and a statement of some of the services he rendered to science. Prominence has been given to his to his to his Autobiography, Principles of Biology, and as a evolutionist little has been position cosmic ; but said of his psychology and sociology, which require another volume, or of his ethics and politics, or of his agnosticism the whetstone of so many critics. Our appreciation of Spencer s services is therefore partial, but it may not for that reason fail in its chief aim, that of illustrating the working of one of the most scientific minds that ever lived, " whose excess of science was almost unscientific." The story of Spencer s life is neither eventful nor picturesque, but it commands the interest of all who admire faith, courage, and loyalty to an ideal. It is a story of plain living and high thinking, of one who, though vexed by an extremely nervous temperament, was as resolute as a Hebrew prophet in delivering his message. It is the story of a quiet servant of science, indifferent to conventional honours, careless about " sensa getting on," disliking controversy, tionalism, and noise, trusting to the power of truth alone, that it must prevail. Another aspect of interest is that Spencer was an arch-heretic, one of the flowers of Nonconformity, viii INTRODUCTION against theology and against metaphysics, against monarchy and against molly-coddling legislation, against classical education and against socialism, against war and against Weismann. So that we can hardly picture the man who has not some crow to pick with Spencer. It is not to be wondered at, then, that we find extraordinary difference of opinion as to the value of the great Dissenter s deliverances. In 1894, Prof. Henry Sidgwick spoke of Herbert Spencer as " our most eminent living philosopher," and in the same sentence described him as "an impressive survival of the drift of thought in the first half of the nineteenth century." Some have likened him to a second Aris totle, while others assure us that the author of the Synthetic Philosophy was not a philosopher at all. Similarly there are scientists who tell us that Spencer may have been a great philosopher, but that he was too much of an a priori thinker to be of great account in science. Many critics, indeed, devote so much time and ability to demonstrating Spencer s incom petence, in this or that field of thought, that the reader is left with the impression that it must be a tower of strength which requires so many assaults. And there are others, neither philosophers nor scientists, who are content to dismiss Spencer with saying that the least in the Kingdom of Heaven is greater than he. Yet this much is conceded by most, that Herbert Spencer was an unusually keen intellectual combatant, who took the evolution- formula into his strong hands as a master-key, and tried (teaching others to try better) to open there with all the locked doors of the universe all the immediate, though none of the ultimate, riddles, INTRODUCTION ix physical and biological, psychological and ethical, social and religious. And this also is conceded, that his life was signalised by absolute consecration to the pursuit of truth, by magnanimous disinterestedness as to rewards, by a resolute struggle against almost overwhelming difficulties, and by an entire fearless ness in delivering the message which he believed the Unknown had given him for the good of the world. In an age of specialism he held up the banner of the Unity of Science, and he actually completed, so far as he could complete, the great task of his life greater than most men have even dreamed of that of applying the evolution-formula to everything knowable. He influenced thought so largely, he inspired so many disciples, he left so many enduring works enduring as seed-plots, if not also as achieve ments that his death, writ large, was immortality. HERBERT SPENCER CHAPTER I HEREDITY Ances try Grandparents Uncles Parents REMARKABLE parents often havecommonplace children, and a genius may be born to a very ordinary couple, yet the importance of pedigree is so patent that our first question in regard to a great man almost invari ably concerns his ancestry. In Herbert Spencer s case the question is rewarded. Ancestry. From the information afforded by the Autobiography in regard to ancestry remoter than grandparents, we learn that, on both sides of the house, Spencer came of a stock characterised by the spirit of nonconformity, by a correlated respect for something higher than legislative enactments, and by a regard for remote issues rather than immediate results. In these respects Herbert Spencer was true to his stock an uncompromising nonconformist, with " a conscience loyal to principles having superhuman above rules origins having human origins," and with an eye ever directed to remote issues. Truly it required more than "ingrained nonconformity," loyalty to principles, and far-sighted prudence to 2 HERBERT SPENCER make a Herbert Spencer, and hundreds unknown to fame have shared a similar but the must heritage ; resemblances between some of Spencer s character istics and those of his stock are too close to be dis regarded. Disown him as many nonconformists did, they could not disinherit him. Nonconformity was in his blood and bone of his bone. Grandparents. Spencer s maternal grandfather, John Holmes of Derby, was a business man and an active Wesleyan, with " a little more than the ordi of nee nary amount faculty." The grandmother, Jane Brettell, is described as commonplace," but her portrait suggests a more charitable verdict. Spencer s paternal grandfather was a schoolmaster, a "mechanical teacher," somewhat oppressed by life, " and extremely tender-hearted." If, when a news paper was being read aloud, there came an account of something cruel or very unjust, he would exclaim : I t it!" "Stop, stop, can bear Of this sensitive temperament his illustrious grandson had a large share. The most notable of the four grandparents was Catherine Spencer, nee Taylor, " of good type and "Born in both physically morally." 1758 and marrying in 1786, when nearly 28, she had eight children, led a very active life, and lived till 1843: dying at the age of 84 in possession of all her faculties." A personal follower of John Wesley, intensely religious, indefatigably unselfish, combining unswerving integrity with uniform good temper and " affection, she had all the domestic virtues in large measures." Her grandson has said that " nothing was specially manifest in her, intellectually considered, unless, indeed, what would be called sound common UNCLES 3 sense." Grandparents taken together count on an average for about a quarter of the individual inherit ance, but we would note that in Herbert Spencer s case, Catherine Spencer should be regarded as a peculiarly dominant hereditary factor. Uncles. Two of her children died in infancy, the was an invalid only surviving daughter (b. 1788) j then came Herbert Spencer s father, William George and there four other (b. 1790), were sons. Henry Spencer, a year and a half younger than Herbert Spencer s father, was " a favourable sample of the with " a dash of type," independent strong chivalry," an energetic, though in the end unsuccessful man of business, an ardent radical and with "a marked sense of humour." The next son, John, had strong in he a dividuality ; was notably self-assertive, obstinate solicitor, successful only in out-living all his brothers. Thomas, the next brother, began active life as a near a school-teacher Derby, was student of St John s, Cambridge, achieved honours (ninth wrangler), and became a clergyman of the Church of England at " " Hinton. He was a reformer," anticipating great " " " movements," a radical," a Free-Trader," a tee " an intensified totaler," Englishman." The youngest " son, William, distinguished less by extent of intel lectual acquisitions than by general soundness of a sense, joined with dash of originality," carried on his father s school, and was one of Herbert Spencer s teachers.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evolution and Personality [1]
    Evolution and Personality [1] James Gibson Hume (1922) Classics in the History of Psychology An internet resource developed by Christopher D. Green , ISSN 1492-3173 (Return to C lassics i ndex ) Evolution and Personality [1] James Gibson Hume (1922) First published in Philosophical Essays Presented to John Watson (pp. 298-330). : Queen's University.[*] Posted October 2001 Spencer in his Data of Ethics treated his subject from several successive standpoints entitled, The Physical, The Biological, The Psychological, the Sociological. He also attempted to co-ordinate all these various stages into what he termed a Synthetic Philosophy. This would give a fifth standpoint, the Philosophical. These five terms might be used to describe several different types of evolutionary theory. Let us note how these arose, that is, let us trace the evolution of evolutionary theory. Physical Evolution. Early Greek speculation was dominated by this standpoint which found its culmination in the Atomists. Among these Empedocles is noteworthy. He is quoted in the article 'Evolution' in the Encyclopaedia Britannica by J. Sully and T. H. Huxley. After a general Cosmology dealing with the formation of the Cosmos from the four original elements, fire, air, earth, water, by love and discord (attraction and repulsion) he proceeds to treat of the first origin of plants and of animals including man. As the original elements entered into various combinations there arose curious aggregates, heads without [p. 299] necks, arms without shoulders. These got strangely combined. Men's heads on oxen's shoulders, heads of .oxen on men's bodies, etc. Most of these combinations could not survive and so disappeared.
    [Show full text]
  • 003B Alhoff 83
    Hist. Phil. Life Sci., 25 (2003), 83-111 ---83 Evolutionary Ethics from Darwin to Moore Fritz Allhoff Department of Philosophy, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA ABSTRACT - Evolutionary ethics has a long history, dating all the way back to Charles Darwin.1 Almost immediately after the publication of the Origin, an immense interest arose in the moral implications of Darwinism and whether the truth of Darwinism would undermine traditional ethics. Though the biological thesis was certainly exciting, nobody suspected that the impact of the Origin would be confined to the scientific arena. As one historian wrote, ‘whether or not ancient populations of armadillos were transformed into the species that currently inhabit the new world was certainly a topic about which zoologists could disagree. But it was in discussing the broader implications of the theory…that tempers flared and statements were made which could transform what otherwise would have been a quiet scholarly meeting into a social scandal’ (Farber 1994, 22). Some resistance to the biological thesis of Darwinism sprung from the thought that it was incompatible with traditional morality and, since one of them had to go, many thought that Darwinism should be rejected. However, some people did realize that a secular ethics was possible so, even if Darwinism did undermine traditional religious beliefs, it need not have any effects on moral thought.2 Before I begin my discussion of evolutionary ethics from Darwin to Moore, I would like to make some more general remarks about its development.3 There are three key events during this history of evolutionary ethics.
    [Show full text]
  • In Defense of Herbert Spencer
    SUBSCRIBE NOW AND RECEIVE CRISIS AND LEVIATHAN* FREE! “The Independent Review does not accept “The Independent Review is pronouncements of government officials nor the excellent.” conventional wisdom at face value.” —GARY BECKER, Noble Laureate —JOHN R. MACARTHUR, Publisher, Harper’s in Economic Sciences Subscribe to The Independent Review and receive a free book of your choice* such as the 25th Anniversary Edition of Crisis and Leviathan: Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government, by Founding Editor Robert Higgs. This quarterly journal, guided by co-editors Christopher J. Coyne, and Michael C. Munger, and Robert M. Whaples offers leading-edge insights on today’s most critical issues in economics, healthcare, education, law, history, political science, philosophy, and sociology. Thought-provoking and educational, The Independent Review is blazing the way toward informed debate! Student? Educator? Journalist? Business or civic leader? Engaged citizen? This journal is for YOU! *Order today for more FREE book options Perfect for students or anyone on the go! The Independent Review is available on mobile devices or tablets: iOS devices, Amazon Kindle Fire, or Android through Magzter. INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE, 100 SWAN WAY, OAKLAND, CA 94621 • 800-927-8733 • [email protected] PROMO CODE IRA1703 CONTROVERSY In Defense of Herbert Spencer ✦ MAX HOCUTT n 1978, Liberty Fund published nineteenth-century intellectual giant Herbert Spencer’s Principles of Ethics in two volumes, with an introduction by Tibor R. IMachan. Spencer’s magnificent tome is full of wisdom and will be read with profit for generations. Machan’s brief introduction is more questionable. Calling it “Herbert Spencer: A Century Later,” Machan begins with some biographical details.
    [Show full text]
  • There Is No Alternative: a Discursive Analysis of Past and Present
    There Is No Alternative: A Discursive Analysis of Past and Present By Senne Vandevelde Introduction There is no alternative, or in short: TINA. One would be hard pressed to find a phrase that is so ideologically charged and at the same time so widely used in the world of politics. To disprove it seems straightforward in all circumstances. The starting point of this dissertation is therefore unequivocal: there is always an alternative. Even if a given socio-economic framework does not permit alternatives, it is always possible to alter the framework itself. As such, TINA or any other argument in the same vein is considered to be absurd. Yet both the use of such arguments as well as their appeal have by no means diminished since they were popularised by Margaret Thatcher in the 1980s. On the contrary, with the advent of the sovereign debt crisis in Europe and the austerity policies that ensued, TINA has only grown in importance. However, several people who used TINA during this time have no political affiliation with Thatcher whatsoever. To illustrate, this dissertation studies TINA as it was inserted into the social democratic prime ministerial discourse in Greece and Spain (which were led by George Papandreou and José Luis Rodriguez Zapatero respectively). To find out what this insertion might mean for the Eurozone and Europe today, this dissertation first goes back in time to uncover the discursive history of TINA. While TINA as an expression was coined originally by Herbert Spencer in the middle of the nineteenth century and eventually became part of regular political discourse with Thatcher, the logic of no alternative has been a recurrent theme for generations of advocates of economic liberalism, a discourse which adheres to the free market, free trade and a minimal state.
    [Show full text]
  • 3-Sem-Core-Classical-Sociological
    MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS SO3CRT03 CLASSICAL SOCIOLOGICAL THEORIES 1. In the history of the development of sociology, ------- is known as a period of remarkable intellectual development and change in philosophical thought. A. Industrial revolution B. Period of enlightenment C. Urbanization D. Religious change 2. The theorists who were most directly and positively influenced by the enlightenment thinking were A. Auguste Comte and Durkheim B. Saint Simon and Durkheim C. Karl Marx and Karl Manheim D. Alexis de Tocqueville and Karl Marx 3. The most extreme form of opposition to Enlightenment ideas was ------ A. French Catholic counterrevolutionary philosophy B. Suffrage Movement C. Orthodox Believers’ Movement D. Western European Union Philosophy 4. One of the prominent leaders of the French Catholic counterrevolutionary philosophy was A. Louis de Bonald B. Lewis Coser C. William Hopkins D. Karl Marx 5. ------------ was greatly influenced by Montesquieu’s ‘The Spirit of the Laws’ A. Machiavelli B. Auguste Comte C. Donald Stevenson D. Alexis de Tocqueville 6. Who coined the term Sociology A. Herbert Spencer B. Saint – Simon C. Auguste Comte D. Karl Marx 7. The scientific view developed by Auguste Comte is known as A. Philosophical science B. Positive philosophy C. Negative philosophy D. Scientific philosophy 8. Auguste Comte initially called Sociology ---------- A. Social dynamics B. Social system C. Social physics D. Social science 9. ‘The Law of Three Stages’ is an idea developed by A. Herbert Spencer B. Auguste Comte C. Karl Marx D. George Simmel 10. Comte developed the Law of Three Stages in his work ---- A. Treatise on Sociology B. Religion of Humanity C.
    [Show full text]
  • ISBN TITLE AUTHOR PUBLISHER/MMEDIUM AREA SHELF LOCATION QUANT 9780761453482 Born for Adventure Kathleen Karr Two Lions Hardcover
    ISBN TITLE AUTHOR PUBLISHER/MMEDIUM AREA SHELF LOCATION QUANT 9780761453482 Born for Adventure Kathleen Karr Two Lions Hardcover Ackerman Children's Literature: Africa 1 9780374371784 Time's Memory Julius Lester Farrar Straus GHardcover Ackerman Children's Literature: Africa 1 At the Crossroads Rachel Isadora Greenwillow Hardcover Ackerman Children's Literature: Africa 1 9780517885444 Tar Beach Faith Ringgold Dragonfly BooPaperback Ackerman Children's Literature: Africa 1 Never Forgotten Patricia McKissack Schwartz and Hardcover Ackerman Children's Literature: Africa 1 9781563978227 Madoulina (Story from West Africa) Joe Bognomo Boyds Mills PrPaperback Ackerman Children's Literature: Africa 1 9780374312893 Circle Unbroken Margot Theis Raven Farrar, Straus Hardcover Ackerman Children's Literature: Africa 1 9780688102562 African Beginnings Kathleen Benson; James Haskins Amistad Hardcover Ackerman Children's Literature: Africa 1 9780688151782 Storytellers, The Ted Lewin Harpercollins Hardcover Ackerman Children's Literature: Africa 1 9780027814903 Abiyoyo Pete Seeger Simon and SchHardcover Ackerman Children's Literature: Africa 1 9780671882686 Fire on the Mountain Earl B. Lewis Simon & SchuHardcover Ackerman Children's Literature: Africa 1 9780690013344 Honey, I Love and Other Love Poems Eloise Greenfield HarperCollins Hardcover Ackerman Children's Literature: Africa 1 9780545270137 One Hen: How One Small Load Made a Big Difference Katie Smith Milway Scholastic Paperback Ackerman Children's Literature: Africa 2 Man of the People: A Novel
    [Show full text]
  • Practical Scientific Knowledge Education Based on Herbert Spencer’S “What Knowledge Is of Most Worth?”
    OPEN ACCESS EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education ISSN: 1305-8223 (online) 1305-8215 (print) 2017 13(7):4291-4299 DOI: 10.12973/eurasia.2017.00836a Practical Scientific Knowledge Education based on Herbert Spencer’s “What Knowledge is of Most Worth?” Yun-Na Liu Tianjin University of Technology, CHINA Kang Li Motorola, CHINA Arlis McLean Motorola, USA Received 12 December 2017 ▪ Revised 11 May 2017 ▪ Accepted 25 May 2017 ABSTRACT For industrial structure upgrading and modern service industry developing, China will need a large number of high-quality talents to contribute to new industrialization. China's higher education is important for cultivating high-quality, multi-skilled and well-trained talents. “What Knowledge is of most Worth?” that raised by Herbert Spencer is one of the most typical questions for education. After investigation, this study researches 2 questions based on China’s huge demand of well-trained, high-skilled, and application-oriented talents under current economic development: 1) “What Knowledge is of most Worth?” Practical Scientific Knowledge. 2) The guidance on the education practice. The essay demonstrates the challenges and provides constructive suggestions including reform education curriculum, strengthen faculty and enhance university-enterprise cooperation which is multi-win for undergraduates, universities and enterprises. Based on the university-enterprise cooperation practice with company M, the experiences are summarized and the research results can be popularized. This thesis will analyze Herbert Spencer’s “What Knowledge is of Most Worth?”, and provide the helpful advices on practical scientific knowledge education based on Herbert Spencer’s “What Knowledge is of Most Worth?” Keywords: practical scientific knowledge education, Herbert Spencer, worth INTRODUCTION In today’s competition, human resources are the most important resource for achieving the goals.
    [Show full text]
  • How Capitalism Lost Its Soul Marie-Laure Salles-Djelic
    How Capitalism Lost its Soul Marie-Laure Salles-Djelic To cite this version: Marie-Laure Salles-Djelic. How Capitalism Lost its Soul: From Protestant Ethics to Robber Barons. D. Daianu; Radu Vranceanu. Ethical Boundaries of Capitalism, Ashgate Publishing, pp.43 - 64, 2005, 9780754643951. hal-01892001 HAL Id: hal-01892001 https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01892001 Submitted on 10 Oct 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. How Capitalism Lost its Soul From Protestant Ethics to Robber Barons Marie-Laure Djelic, ESSEC, France Published in Daianu, D. and Vranceanu, R. (eds), Ethical Boundaries of Capitalism, Ashgate 2005 1. Introduction A serious discussion of capitalism and its development cannot avoid the confrontation, at one moment or another, with ethical issues. Historically, there have been quite a number of different positions in the debate – giving us a sense that the confrontation is, indeed, a complex one. When it comes to the connection between ethics and capitalism, we can differentiate between at least four different ideal typical perspectives. First, we find what we call the missionary perspective. „Missionaries‟ are in general associated with the liberal tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • Left-Libertarianism: a Review Essay
    BARBARA H. FRIED Left-Libertarianism: A Review Essay I. INTRODUCTION Peter Vallentyne and Hillel Steiner's two-volume collection of historical and contemporary works on left-libertarianism formally marks the emergence over the past two decades of a theory of distributive justice that seeks to harness the premises of the libertarian right to the political agenda of the egalitarian left. Its proponents and sympathetic fellow travelers include (in addition to Vallentyne and Steiner) Philippe Van Parijs, Allan Gibbard, Michael Otsuka, Baruch Brody, and James Grunebaum, among others. Vallentyne and Steiner draw together a wealth of interesting material, intelligently situated in the excellent introductory essays and sum- maries provided by the editors. The first volume, The Origins of Left- Libertarianism, contains writings from a number of historical figures whom Vallentyne and Steiner correctly identify as intellectual forebears. In this group are John Locke, early agrarian radicals Thomas Paine and William Ogilvie, liberal socialists of the mid-nineteenth century includ- ing Hippolyte Colins, Leon Walras and Francois Huet, and left-liberal radical land reformers including J. S. Mill, (the early) Herbert Spencer, and, most famously, Henry George. The volume brings to the fore a long This article considers The Origins of Left-Libertarianism: An Anthology of Historical Writings and Left-Libertarianism and its Critics: The Contemporary Debate both edited by Peter Vallentyne and Hillel Steiner (New York: Palgrave, 2000), hereinafter V&S or V&SII. Earlier versions were presented at faculty workshops at Boston University, University of Michigan, Stanford University and New York University law schools. I am grateful to par- ticipants in those workshops, as well as to Elizabeth Anderson, Joseph Bankman, Hugh Baxter, Thomas Grey, Don Herzog, Mark Kelman, Gary Lawson, Debra Satz, Bill Simon and the Editors of Philosophy & Public Affairs for their very helpful comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Durkheim's Refutation of Spencerian Methodological Individualism: a Critical Evaluation
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2009 Durkheim's Refutation of Spencerian Methodological Individualism: A Critical Evaluation. Matthew rB yan Smith East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Theory, Knowledge and Science Commons Recommended Citation Smith, Matthew Bryan, "Durkheim's Refutation of Spencerian Methodological Individualism: A Critical Evaluation." (2009). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1891. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1891 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Durkheim’s Refutation of Spencerian Methodological Individualism: A Critical Evaluation ____________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of Sociology and Anthropology East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in Sociology ___________________ by Matthew Bryan Smith May 2009 ___________________ Dr. Paul Kamolnick, Chair Dr. Scott Beck Dr. Michael Allen Keywords: Durkheim, Spencer, individualism, social facts, collective consciousness, division of labor, group mind, morality, contract. ABSTRACT Durkheim’s Refutation of Spencerian Methodological Individualism: A Critical Evaluation by Matthew Bryan Smith The famed French classical social theorist Emile Durkheim’s academic reputation is based largely on his critical rejection of the British utilitarian tradition and specifically the writings of the classical British sociologist Herbert Spencer.
    [Show full text]
  • Herbert Spencer
    5 Herbert Spencer Draft Proof - Do not copy, post, or distribute Copyright ©2017 by SAGE Publications, Inc. This work may not be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means without express written permission of the publisher. Chapter 5 Herbert Spencer 131 Chapter Outline Spencer and Comte General Theoretical Principles Sociology The Evolution of Society Ethics and Politics Criticisms and Contemporary Applications n the theoretical ideas of Herbert Spencer (1820–1903) we see a considerable advance over those of Auguste Comte. Not only was Spencer’s work important in Ithe development of sociological theory, but many of his theoretical ideas stand up well from the vantage point of contemporary sociological theory. In spite of this, Jonathan Turner (1985b; see also Francis, 2007, 2011), who has agreed with many of Spencer’s ideas, pointed out that modern sociological theorists have been disinclined to take Spencer seriously, relegating him, like Comte, to the “dustbin” of history. (Actually, in superheated terms, Turner argued that contemporary social theorists have been inclined to “spit on the grave of Spencer” [1985b:71].) This negativity is, to a large extent, traceable to Spencer’s highly conservative libertarian (not liberal) politics and to his belief in a sociological version of survival of the fittest. Although we do not fully share Turner’s enthusiasm for Spencer, there is much of merit in Spencer’s work. We demonstrate that a number of Spencer’s theoretical ideas con- tinue to be important and relevant to sociological theory. However, there are also serious problems with Spencer’s theory that lead to the conclusion that although it represents an advance over Comtian theory, it is not quite up to the standard of the other major early theorists—Marx, Durkheim, Weber, and Simmel—to be discussed in the ensuing four chapters.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Classical Liberalism in “Progressive” Times: the Divergent
    Rethinking Classical Liberalism in “Progressive” Times: The Divergent Sociologies of Spencer and Sumner Robert Adcock [email protected] Department of Political Science The George Washington University Paper presented at panel on “Rethinking Teleology and Liberalism,” Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Toronto. September 4, 2009. 1 Nineteenth-century liberal political thought was intimately interwoven with theories of transformative social change. Liberal institutions and ideals were championed as the optimal political order for “modern” or “advanced” societies.1 This mode of argument was premised on beliefs about the character of such societies and how they arise. When early nineteenth-century liberals such as Benjamin Constant articulated these beliefs they drew on the theory of the rise of “commercial society” associated with the Scottish Enlightenment.2 But that theory predated, and thus did not speak directly to, democratization and industrialization, the two dominant socially transformative trends of the new century. When Tocqueville updated liberalism by addressing these trends in the 1830s he interpreted them as potential threats to the political order classical liberals advocated: a representative government limited to securing peace, property, and the rule of law, and thereby, a society in which the motor of progress is free competition and association. The dark edge of Tocqueville’s analysis was, however, mitigated by mid-century as liberals such as John Stuart Mill intellectually tamed industrialization and suffrage expansion by interpreting them as extensions of paths of economic and political progress charted in the rise of commerce. Classical liberalism’s limited government ideal was thereby rearticulated as being just as relevant and forward-looking a political theory as it had been early in the century.
    [Show full text]