DOCSLIB.ORG

Geotechnical, Geologic, and Seismic Impacts Technical Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geotechnical, Geologic, and Seismic Impacts Technical Report Geotechnical, Geologic, and Seismic Impacts Technical Report April 2013 Prepared by Geotechnical, Geologic and Seismic Impacts Technical Report April 2013 Prepared by: The San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Geotechnical, Geologic and Seismic Impacts Technical Report Table of Contents Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Purpose of the Report ........................................................................................ 1-1 1.1.1 Organization ........................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.2 Impact Evaluation ................................................................................... 1-2 1.2 Description of the Mid-Coast Corridor ................................................................ 1-3 1.3 Alternatives under Consideration ....................................................................... 1-5 1.3.1 No-Build Alternative ................................................................................ 1-5 1.3.2 Build Alternative .................................................................................... 1-13 2.0 REGULATORY CONTEXT ............................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Federal ............................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 National Environmental Policy Act .......................................................... 2-1 2.1.2 Federal Water Pollution Control Act ....................................................... 2-2 2.1.3 National Engineering Handbook ............................................................. 2-2 2.1.4 American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association Manual for Railway Engineering .......................................... 2-2 2.2 State ................................................................................................................... 2-2 2.2.1 California Environmental Quality Act ...................................................... 2-2 2.2.2 California Government Code .................................................................. 2-3 2.2.3 Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act ............................................ 2-4 2.2.4 Seismic Hazard Mapping Act .................................................................. 2-4 2.2.5 California Building Code ......................................................................... 2-4 2.2.6 California Department of Transportation ................................................. 2-4 2.3 Local ................................................................................................................... 2-5 2.3.1 City of San Diego Building and Fire Codes ............................................ 2-5 2.3.2 City of San Diego Municipal Code .......................................................... 2-5 2.3.3 City of San Diego Public Facilities, Services and Safety Element (Hazard Reduction) ................................................................................. 2-5 2.3.4 City of San Diego Seismic Safety Element (Geologic and Seismic Hazards) ................................................................................................. 2-6 3.0 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Study Area .......................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Data Sources ...................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2.1 Aerial Photography Analysis ................................................................... 3-1 3.2.2 Literature Review .................................................................................... 3-2 3.2.3 Consultant Reports and Geotechnical Borings ....................................... 3-2 3.2.4 Topographic Analysis ............................................................................. 3-2 3.2.5 Field Reconnaissance ............................................................................ 3-3 3.2.6 Fault Rupture Analysis............................................................................ 3-3 3.3 Impacts Assessment .......................................................................................... 3-4 3.4 Impact Determination ......................................................................................... 3-5 3.4.1 NEPA Guidance...................................................................................... 3-5 3.4.2 CEQA Guidance ..................................................................................... 3-5 4.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Geology and Soils .............................................................................................. 4-1 MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT April 2013 i Geotechnical, Geologic and Seismic Impacts Technical Report Table of Contents 4.1.1 Regional Geology ................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.2 Mid-Coast Corridor Geology ................................................................... 4-3 4.1.3 Corridor Soils .......................................................................................... 4-9 4.1.4 Ground Water ....................................................................................... 4-10 4.2 Geologic and Seismic Hazards ........................................................................ 4-15 4.2.1 Regional Faulting .................................................................................. 4-16 4.2.2 Seismicity.............................................................................................. 4-22 4.2.3 Local Faulting and Surface Fault Rupture Hazard ................................ 4-25 4.2.4 Strong Ground Shaking ........................................................................ 4-46 4.2.5 Liquefaction and Seismic Settlement .................................................... 4-47 4.2.6 Lateral Spread ...................................................................................... 4-48 4.2.7 Tsunami and Seiche ............................................................................. 4-48 4.2.8 Landslides, Mudslides, and Slope Stability ........................................... 4-49 4.2.9 Compressible Soils ............................................................................... 4-53 4.2.10 Subsidence ........................................................................................... 4-53 4.2.11 Corrosive Soils...................................................................................... 4-53 4.2.12 Expansive Soils .................................................................................... 4-53 4.2.13 Erosion Potential................................................................................... 4-54 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ....................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Direct and Indirect Impacts ................................................................................. 5-1 5.1.1 No-Build Alternative ................................................................................ 5-1 5.1.2 Build Alternative ...................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 Cumulative Impacts ............................................................................................ 5-6 5.3 Construction Impacts .......................................................................................... 5-7 6.0 MITIGATION .................................................................................................................. 6-1 7.0 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT DETERMINATION ......................... 7-1 7.1 Significance Criteria and Significance Criteria Application ................................. 7-1 7.2 Significance after Mitigation ............................................................................... 7-4 7.3 Cumulative Impacts ............................................................................................ 7-4 8.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................... 8-1 9.0 LIMITATIONS AND PREPARER SIGNATURES .......................................................... 9-1 List of Appendices APPENDIX A FAULT INTERPRETATION FROM AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY .................... A-1 MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT ii April 2013 Geotechnical, Geologic and Seismic Impacts Technical Report Table of Contents List of Figures Figure 1-1. Mid-Coast Corridor ............................................................................................. 1-4 Figure 1-2. No-Build Alternative Transportation Improvements ............................................ 1-7 Figure 1-3. No-Build Alternative Major Bus Routes .............................................................. 1-9 Figure 1-4. No-Build Alternative Bus Route 150 ................................................................. 1-11 Figure 1-5. No-Build Alternative Trolley Operating Plan in 2030 ........................................ 1-12 Figure 1-6. Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project ..................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 4 Conceptual Alternatives Considered
    Chapter 4 Conceptual Alternatives Considered MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 2010 Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Chapter 4.0 - Conceptual Alternatives Considered 4.0 CONCEPTUAL ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED The various alignment segments remaining after screening in each of the three segments (i.e., south, middle, and north) were combined into a set of full-length corridor conceptual alternatives carried forward to the comparative evaluation in step two of the three-step alternatives screening and evaluation process. The set of build alternatives for the Mid-Coast Corridor includes seven light rail transit (LRT) alternatives, four bus rapid transit (BRT) alternatives, and one Commuter Rail Alternative. Together with the No-Build Alternative and Transportation System Management (TSM) Alternative, these alternatives represent the set of alternatives carried forward for conceptual definition and evaluation. This chapter defines the conceptual alternatives under consideration for scoping. A discussion of alternatives proposed by others and the results of a peer review of the range of alternatives developed also is included. The definitions provide a description of the physical, operating, and policy assumptions developed for each alternative. Conceptual plans showing the horizontal and vertical alignments on aerial photography and station/stop locations for the proposed transit improvements under No-Build, TSM, and build alternatives are contained in Appendix A, Conceptual Plans, of this report. The basis for the development of the transit service improvements included as part of the TSM and build alternatives was the identification of travel markets described in Chapter 1, Purpose and Need, of this report. Travel markets identify the origins, destinations, and types of trips to be served by the proposed transit improvements under the alternatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction Update – February 19, 2019 PROJECT OVERVIEW
    Construction Update – February 19, 2019 PROJECT OVERVIEW 11-mile extension of Trolley Blue Line Old Town Transit Center to Westfield UTC 9 new stations (5 with parking) 36 trolley cars CONSTRUCTION OVERVIEW Relocate Build supporting Construct stations, Install track Testing and utilities infrastructure bridges and viaduct and power start-up San Diego River Bridge January 2018 January 2019 Storm Drain Installation near Tecolote Road Tecolote Road Station Site Tecolote Road Station Site 280 surface parking spaces for transit riders Tecolote Road and W. Morena Boulevard Clairemont Drive Station Site Future Development 150 surface parking spaces for transit riders Clairemont Drive Station / Morena Boulevard Morena Boulevard and Clairemont Drive Station Balboa Avenue Station Site 220 surface parking spaces for transit riders Kiss-and-ride drop-off / pick-up area 5 bus bays within station + 1-2 along Morena Blvd Pedestrian access from both sides of Balboa Ave Electric Vehicle Charging Stations Bicycle parking facilities 1-5 Off-ramp and Balboa Avenue Station Construction Update 1-5 Off-ramp to Balboa Avenue Work Area and Detour Map Balboa Avenue Bridges Retaining Wall north of Balboa Avenue Retaining Wall under SR-52 Retaining Wall at La Jolla Colony Mid-Coast – UCSD Viaduct Rose Creek Bikeway Absolute Work Windows (AWWs) • Select weekends where all rail service is suspended • Allows critical project milestones to be met • Reduces overall project schedule and budget • Ensures construction crew safety • Work competed during AWWs could include: o Rail replacement and repair o Replacement of rail ties o Bridge repair o Rail resurfacing o Undercrossing installation Rose Creek Flyover OH LRT - AWW Bent Cap 10 Bent Cap 7 Feb 9 & 10 AWW: • removed bent 7 falsework • erected bent 8 & 9 falsework Genesee Avenue / La Jolla Village Drive Girder Installation Contact Us [email protected] (877) 379-0110 KeepSanDiegoMoving.com/MidCoast Mid-Coast Trolley @MidCoastTrolley.
    [Show full text]
  • Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project SAN DIEGO TROLLEY SYSTEM
    Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project SAN DIEGO TROLLEY SYSTEM Mid-Coast Opened 1981 Currently operates 54 miles of revenue service with 53 stations 97,000 weekday riders, 32 million annual riders Blue Line has the highest fare box recovery ratio in the nation Recently completed $660 million Trolley Renewal Program, including procurement of 65 new low-floor vehicles 1 MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT OVERVIEW $1.7 billion, 11-mile LRT extension - Old Town Transit Center to Westfield UTC One seat ride San Ysidro to University City area Nine new stations 36 new rail vehicles Estimated 21,000 daily boardings Presidents FY 2016 budget includes recommendation of $150 million 2 MID-COAST AND THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO Connects 2 largest employment centers Connects 3 largest universities (UCSD, USD, San Diego State) Connects bedroom communities in South Bay to high end jobs in University City University City Connects these same communities to our largest health care facilities including the VA hospital Five of the nine environmental justice populations are located within one-half mile of the project alignment Downtown San Diego 3 AT-GRADE STATIONS Tecolote Road Clairemont Drive Balboa Ave Bus Transit Center VA Medical Center 4 TECOLOTE ROAD STATION 5 CLAIREMONT DRIVE STATION 6 BALBOA AVENUE STATION 7 VA MEDICAL CENTER 8 VA MEDICAL CENTER 9 AERIAL STATIONS & VIADUCT Nobel Drive Pepper Canyon at UCSD Voigt Drive at UCSD Executive Drive University Town Center 10 NOBEL DRIVE STATION 11 NOBEL DRIVE STATION 12 PEPPER CANYON AT UCSD
    [Show full text]
  • Mid-Coast Corridor Region
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA -- THE NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., Governor CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SAN DIEGO AREA 7575 METROPOLITAN DRIVE, SUITE 103 SAN DIEGO, CA 92108-4402 (619) 767-2370 W11b Addendum July 12, 2016 To: Commissioners and Interested Persons From: California Coastal Commission San Diego Staff Subject: Addendum to Item W11b, Coastal Commission Permit Application No. 6-16-0108 (SANDAG), for the Commission Meeting of Wednesday, July 13, 2016. ________________________________________________________________________ The purpose of this addendum is to clarify overlapping habitat impacts with a previously approved adjacent rail project and correct related calculations for anticipated habitat impacts, as well as add public comment letters as a new Exhibit No. 13. Staff recommends the following changes be made to the above-referenced staff report. Deletions shall be marked by a strikethrough and additions shall be underlined: 1. On page 2 of the staff report, add the following paragraph between the second and third paragraphs: One of the primary components of the proposed project – a new Trolley bridge over the San Diego River – would be located directly adjacent to an existing single-track rail bridge over the San Diego River. In December 2015, the Commission concurred with SANDAG’s consistency certification (CC-0003-15) to replace the single-track rail bridge with a new double-track bridge. To minimize spatial and temporal impacts, SANDAG will be utilizing a coordinated construction approach to build the rail bridge and the proposed Trolley bridge. The same contractor will be used to build both bridges and bridges will be built consecutively, starting with the rail bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project Final Supplemental Environmental
    Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement and Subsequent Environmental Impact Report Volume 1 State Clearinghouse No. 2010051001 U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration and the San Diego Association of Governments September 2014 Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project San Diego, California FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT PREPARED PURSUANT TO: National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, § 102 (42 United States Code [USC] § 4332); Federal Transit Law (49 USC Chapter 53); Public Law 112-141, 126 Statute 405, Section 1319(b); Clean Water Act, § 404 (33 USC § 1344); Clean Air Act (42 USC § 7401 et seq.); Endangered Species Act (7 USC § 136; 16 USC § 1531 et seq.); National Historic Preservation Act, § 106 (16 USC § 470f); Department of Transportation Act, § 4(f) (49 USC § 303); 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) § 622.101; 23 CFR Parts 771 and 774; 36 CFR Part 800; 40 CFR Parts 51, 93 and 1500-1508; and Executive Orders 11988 (Floodplain Management) and 12898 (Environmental Justice). by the FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and the SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (SANDAG) _________________________________________ ______________________ Leslie T. Rogers Date of Approval Regional Administrator, Region IX Federal Transit Administration _________________________________________ ______________________ Gary Gallegos Date of Approval Executive Director San Diego Association of Governments MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT September 2014 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT September 2014 ABSTRACT The Federal Transit Administration and the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) have completed Preliminary Engineering and preparation of a Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) for the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project in San Diego, San Diego County, California.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Agenda
    Board Members Lori Holt Pfeiler, Chair Mayor, Escondido Jerome Stocks, First Vice Chair Councilmember, Encinitas Jack Dale, Second Vice Chair Councilmember, Santee Matt Hall Councilmember, Carlsbad Cheryl Cox BOARD OF DIRECTORS Mayor, Chula Vista Carrie Downey AGENDA Councilmember, Coronado Crystal Crawford Councilmember, Del Mar Mark Lewis Note meeting time change to 8 a.m. Mayor, El Cajon Jim Janney Mayor, Imperial Beach Friday, July 23, 2010 Art Madrid Mayor, La Mesa ¾ ¾ ¾ 8 a.m. to 12 noon ½ ½ ½ Mary Teresa Sessom SANDAG Board Room Mayor, Lemon Grove 401 B Street, 7th Floor Ron Morrison Mayor, National City San Diego Jim Wood Mayor, Oceanside Don Higginson Mayor, Poway Jerry Sanders Mayor, San Diego AGENDA HIGHLIGHTS Ben Hueso Council President, San Diego Jim Desmond • DRAFT 2010 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION Mayor, San Marcos IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Lesa Heebner Deputy Mayor, Solana Beach Judy Ritter • MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT – FINAL Mayor Pro Tem, Vista COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES Pam Slater-Price Chairwoman, County of San Diego REPORT Bill Horn Vice Chairman, County of San Diego • 2010 TransNet PLAN OF FINANCE UPDATE Advisory Members Hon. Wally Leimgruber, Supervisor • 2050 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN: DRAFT Imperial County PLAN PERFORMANCE MEASURES AND DRAFT Cindy McKim, Director California Department UNCONSTRAINED TRANSPORTATION NETWORK of Transportation Harry Mathis, Chairman Metropolitan Transit System PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES DURING THE MEETING Bob Campbell, Chairman North County Transit District YOU CAN LISTEN TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS CAPT Keith Hamilton, USN, CEC, Southwest Division Naval Facilities MEETING BY VISITING OUR WEB SITE AT WWW.SANDAG.ORG Engineering Command U.S. Department of Defense Scott Peters, Commissioner San Diego Unified Port District MISSION STATEMENT The 18 cities and county government are SANDAG serving as the forum for regional decision-making.
    [Show full text]
  • Clairemont Community Planning Group September 20, 2016 PROJECT OVERVIEW
    Clairemont Community Planning Group September 20, 2016 PROJECT OVERVIEW • 11-mile extension of Trolley Blue Line • Old Town Transit Center to Westfield UTC Transit Station • Nine new stations (five with parking) • 36 new rail vehicles CONSTRUCTION OVERVIEW Relocate Build supporting Construct stations, Install track Testing & start-up utilities infrastructure bridges and viaduct and power CONSTRUCTION OVERVIEW BUILD STATIONS CONSTRUCTION OVERVIEW • Daytime construction hours generally M-F, 7 a.m.– 5 p.m. • Night time construction hours generally M-F, 7 p.m. – 5 a.m. • Weekend work, as needed • Right-of-way acquisition in process • Traffic Management Plans • Noise permits for night time work • Dust mitigation TECOLOTE ROAD STATION SITE PLAN TECOLOTE ROAD STATION RENDERING CLAIREMONT DRIVE STATION SITE PLAN CLAIREMONT DRIVE STATION RENDERING CLAIREMONT DRIVE STATION RENDERING BALBOA AVENUE STATION SITE PLAN BALBOA AVENUE STATION RENDERING CONSTRUCTION IN CLAIREMONT AREA • Late 2016: SB Morena in railroad corridor • Early 2017: Work/laydown at Tecolote site • Early 2017: Balboa area LOSSAN bridge, wall, and off ramp • 2017: Demo/site-work/laydown at Clairemont site • Early 2018: Station platforms and Tecolote creek LRT bridge • 2018-2019: Parking, stations, substations, roadways, and traffic signals • 2019: Balboa area LRT bridge, walls, stairs, etc. Easing Construction Impacts Maintain a safe Keep people moving Protect the environment construction site Continue community outreach Construction hotline Coordinate with emergency services PROJECT
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda and Meeting Notice
    Board Members Ron Roberts, Chair Chair, County of San Diego Terry Sinnott, First Vice Chair Deputy Mayor, Del Mar Matt Hall Mayor, Carlsbad Mary Salas Mayor, Chula Vista BOARD OF DIRECTORS Carrie Downey Councilmember, Coronado Bill Wells AGENDA Mayor, El Cajon Lisa Shaffer Deputy Mayor, Encinitas Friday, January 22, 2016 Sam Abed 9 a.m. to 12 noon Mayor, Escondido Serge Dedina SANDAG Board Room Mayor, Imperial Beach 401 B Street, 7th Floor Kristine Alessio Councilmember, La Mesa San Diego Mary Teresa Sessom Mayor, Lemon Grove Ron Morrison Mayor, National City Jim Wood AGENDA HIGHLIGHTS Mayor, Oceanside Steve Vaus Mayor, Poway • HEARING OF NECESSITY: ACQUISITION OF Kevin Faulconer PROPERTY INTERESTS LOCATED IN THE CITY OF Mayor, City of San Diego SAN DIEGO FOR THE MID-COAST CORRIDOR Todd Gloria Councilmember, City of San Diego TRANSIT PROJECT, SAN DIEGO RIVER DOUBLE- Jack Dale TRACK PROJECT, AND ELVIRA TO MORENA Councilmember, Santee DOUBLE-TRACK PROJECT Jim Desmond Mayor, San Marcos Lesa Heebner • 2015 TransnNet PLAN OF FINANCE UPDATE Councilmember, Solana Beach Judy Ritter • 2015 TransNet TRANSIT OPERATIONS PLAN OF Mayor, Vista FINANCE Dianne Jacob Vice Chair, County of San Diego Advisory Members PLEASE SILENCE ALL ELECTRONIC DEVICES DURING THE MEETING Hon. John Renison Supervisor, District 1 Imperial County YOU CAN LISTEN TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Malcolm Dougherty, Director MEETING BY VISITING OUR WEBSITE AT SANDAG.ORG California Department of Transportation MESSAGE FROM THE CLERK Harry Mathis, Chair Metropolitan Transit System In compliance with Government Code §54952.3, the Clerk hereby announces that the compensation for legislative body members attending the following simultaneous or serial meetings is: Executive Mark Packard, Chair North County Transit District Committee (EC) $100, Board of Directors (BOD) $150, and Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) CAPT John J.
    [Show full text]
  • PROJECT WORKING GROUP STATIONS DESIGN UPDATE June 16, 2014
    PROJECT WORKING GROUP STATIONS DESIGN UPDATE June 16, 2014 1 At‐Grade Station Concepts Illustrate site plan and organization of station features for: Tecolote Road Station Clairemont Drive Station Balboa Avenue Station Design Features For the station area and platform: Shelter Concepts Separation Wall Station Furniture Landscape Theme 2 STATION DESIGN WORKSHOP AT‐GRADE STATION CONCEPTS 3 STATION DESIGN WORKSHOP Tecolote Road Station Site Plan 4 STATION DESIGN WORKSHOP Tecolote Road Station –Cross Section TECOLOTE PARK and RIDE LOSSAN STATION CORRIDOR 5 STATION DESIGN WORKSHOP Clairemont Drive Station Site Plan 6 STATION DESIGN WORKSHOP Clairemont Drive Station – Cross Section INTERSTATE 5 LOSSAN CLAIREMONT MORENA PARK and RIDE North Bound Lanes CORRIDOR STATION BOULEVARD PARK and RIDE FACILITY LOSSAN CLAIREMONT MORENA CORRIDOR STATION BOULEVARD 7 STATION DESIGN WORKSHOP Balboa Avenue Station Site Plan 8 STATION DESIGN WORKSHOP Balboa Avenue Station – Cross Section BALBOA TRANSIT PARK and RIDE STATION PLAZA LOSSAN CORRIDOR Section Looking North 9 STATION DESIGN WORKSHOP AT‐GRADE STATIONS DESIGN FEATURES 10 STATION DESIGN WORKSHOP Green Line –Convention Center Orange Line –47th Street Blue Line –Iris Avenue Downtown C Street – Civic Center Green Line –Seaport Village 11 SHELTER CONCEPTS OPTION 1 OPTION 3 OPTION 2 12 SHELTER CONCEPTS OPTION 1 13 SHELTER CONCEPTS OPTION 2 14 SHELTER CONCEPTS OPTION 2a 15 SHELTER CONCEPTS OPTION 3 16 SHELTER CONCEPTS OPTION 1 OPTION 2 OPTION 3 17 SHELTER CONCEPTS OPTION 1 18 SHELTER CONCEPTS OPTION 2
    [Show full text]
  • Tecolote Road Station Layout Options Technical Memorandum
    Tecolote Road Station Layout Options Technical Memorandum August 2014 Prepared by Tecolote Road Station Layout Options Technical Memorandum August 2014 Prepared by: The San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Tecolote Road Station Layout Options Technical Memorandum Introduction In April 2013, the Federal Transit Administration and the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) completed the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement/Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIS/SEIR). The Draft SEIS/SEIR evaluated a Build Alternative and a No-Build Alternative. The Build Alternative provided for the extension of the Trolley Blue Line from the Santa Fe Depot in Downtown San Diego to the University Towne Centre (UTC) Transit Center in University City. The Draft SEIS/SEIR was available for review and comment from May 17, 2013 through July 17, 2013. Approximately 1,420 comments were received during the comment period from more than 300 individuals, organizations, and agencies. All substantial comments received on the Draft SEIS/SEIR will be responded to in the Final SEIS/SEIR. Several of the comments received during the comment period warranted consideration prior to finalizing the Build Alternative for evaluation in the Final SEIS/SEIR due to their potential to affect the alignment, stations, or other elements of the Build Alternative. Comments regarding the station at Tecolote Road opposed the relocation of the Armstrong Garden Center to accommodate the Tecolote Road Station and the park-and-ride facility. In addition, Toys “R” Us indicated that the loss of parking could impose significant costs to reconstruct the store; otherwise, Toys “R” Us may terminate its lease.
    [Show full text]
  • Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project Contractor Outreach
    Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project Contractor Outreach Navy Gold Coast Event August 6, 2018 AGENDA • Project(s) Overview • Who is MCTC? • What is CM/GC? • Self-Performed and Subcontractor Work • Construction Bench • Project Requirements • Contact Us MID-COAST TRANSIT CONSTRUCTORS Eric Meisgeier, MCTC, Deputy Project Manager Project Overview Program Summary Project Name Supplement 1 Early work Package (CP Rose & Wet Utilities) Supplement 2 San Diego River Double Track (SDRDT) Supplement 3 Gilman Bridge Supplement 4 Mid-Coast Transit Project (MCCTP) Supplement 5 Elvira – Morena DBL Track (EMDT) Supplement 6 Voigt Drive Over Crossing Supplement 7 Rose Creek Bikeway (RCBW) Total Project Value – in excess of $1 Billion & 56 Month Duration Mid-Coast Project Overview • Extension of Trolley Blue Line from Downtown to UTC Transit Center • 10.9 miles of new LRT tracks • 4 plus miles of elevated guideway & bridges • 4 at-grade and 5 aerial stations • Traction power, signals & communications • Special trackwork & shoofly track • Utility relocation SAN DIEGO RIVER BRIDGE DOUBLE TRACK • Double track heavy rail bridge over San Diego River • 1 mile of new double track SDRDT • 2000’ of new bridges, before DB16 building new light rail transit (LRT) bridge • Integral coordination with Mid- Coast project Slide 7 DB16 is this correct? Desiree Benet, 7/17/2018 MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT MCCTP • Extension of the blue line trolley from Old Town San Diego to UTC Transit Center MCCTP • 10.9 miles of new LRT double track, SDRDT 3.3 miles of it aerial viaduct
    [Show full text]
  • MCCT Travel Forecasting Results Report
    Travel Forecasting Results Report August 2014 Prepared by Travel Forecasting Results Report August 2014 Prepared by: The San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Travel Forecasting Results Report Table of Contents Table of Contents PREFACE ............................................................................................................................... P-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose of the Report ...................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Description of the Mid-Coast Corridor .............................................................. 1-2 1.3 Alternatives under Consideration ..................................................................... 1-2 1.3.1 No-Build Alternative .............................................................................. 1-2 1.3.2 Build Alternative ................................................................................. 1-12 2.0 TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL AND TRAVEL DEMAND................................................ 2-1 2.1 Travel Demand Model ...................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Travel Analysis Districts ................................................................................... 2-2 2.3 Travel Demand Forecasts ................................................................................ 2-4 2.4 Major Transit Markets
    [Show full text]