Meeting Agenda
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Cultural Resources Assessment Report for the Rockport Ranch Project Menifee, California (Gpa 2016-287, Cz 2016-288, Sp 2016-286, Tr 2016-285)
CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR THE ROCKPORT RANCH PROJECT MENIFEE, CALIFORNIA (GPA 2016-287, CZ 2016-288, SP 2016-286, TR 2016-285) Prepared for: Mr. Jason Greminger Consultants Collaborative 160 Industrial Street San Marcos, CA 92078 Submitted by: Laguna Mountain Environmental, Inc. 7969 Engineer Road, Suite 208 San Diego, CA 92111 LME Project #1705 Andrew R. Pigniolo, RPA Carol Serr June 2017 National Archaeological Data Base Information Type of Study: Cultural Resource Assessment Sites: None USGS Quadrangle: Romoland, and Winchester 7.5' Area: 79.68 Acres Key Words: City of Menifee, County of Riverside, Negative Survey TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page ABSTRACT.. iii I. INTRODUCTION. 1 A. Project Location and Description.. 1 B. Project Personnel. 1 C. Structure of the Report.. 1 II. NATURAL AND CULTURAL SETTING. 4 A. Natural Setting. 4 B. Cultural Setting. 4 C. Prior Research. 8 III. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS. 12 A. Survey Research Design. 12 B. Survey Methods. 12 IV. SURVEY RESULTS. 13 V. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS. 14 VI. REFERENCES. 15 APPENDICES A. Resume of Principal Investigator B. Archaeological Records Search Confirmation Cultural Resources Assessment Report for the Rockport Ranch Project Page i LIST OF FIGURES Number Title Page 1 Regional Location Map. 2 2 Project Location. 3 LIST OF TABLES Number Title Page 1 Cultural Resources Investigations within One Mile of the Project Area.. 9 2 Recorded Cultural Resources within One Mile of the Project Area. 11 Cultural Resources Assessment Report for the Rockport Ranch Project Page ii Abstract ABSTRACT Laguna Mountain Environmental, Inc. (Laguna Mountain) completed a cultural resource assessment for the proposed Rockport Ranch Development. -
Chapter 11 Case No. 21-10632 (MBK)
Case 21-10632-MBK Doc 249 Filed 04/06/21 Entered 04/06/21 16:21:35 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 92 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY In re: Chapter 11 L’OCCITANE, INC., Case No. 21-10632 (MBK) Debtor. Judge: Hon. Michael B. Kaplan CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Ana M. Galvan, depose and say that I am employed by Stretto, the claims and noticing agent for the Debtors in the above-captioned case. On April 2, 2021, at my direction and under my supervision, employees of Stretto caused the following documents to be served via first-class mail on the service list attached hereto as Exhibit A, and via electronic mail on the service list attached hereto as Exhibit B: Notice of Deadline for Filing Proofs of Claim Against the Debtor L’Occitane, Inc. (attached hereto as Exhibit C) [Customized] Official Form 410 Proof of Claim (attached hereto as Exhibit D) Official Form 410 Instructions for Proof of Claim (attached hereto as Exhibit E) Dated: April 6, 2021 /s/ Ana M. Galvan Ana M. Galvan STRETTO 410 Exchange, Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92602 Telephone: 855-434-5886 Email: [email protected] Case 21-10632-MBK Doc 249 Filed 04/06/21 Entered 04/06/21 16:21:35 Desc Main Document Page 2 of 92 Exhibit A Case 21-10632-MBK Doc 249 Filed 04/06/21 Entered 04/06/21 16:21:35 Desc Main Document Page 3 of 92 Exhibit A Served via First-Class Mail Name Attention Address 1 Address 2 Address 3 City State Zip Country 1046 Madison Ave LLC c/o HMH Realty Co., Inc., Rexton Realty Co. -
Chapter 4 Conceptual Alternatives Considered
Chapter 4 Conceptual Alternatives Considered MID-COAST CORRIDOR TRANSIT PROJECT July 2010 Comparative Evaluation of Alternatives Chapter 4.0 - Conceptual Alternatives Considered 4.0 CONCEPTUAL ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED The various alignment segments remaining after screening in each of the three segments (i.e., south, middle, and north) were combined into a set of full-length corridor conceptual alternatives carried forward to the comparative evaluation in step two of the three-step alternatives screening and evaluation process. The set of build alternatives for the Mid-Coast Corridor includes seven light rail transit (LRT) alternatives, four bus rapid transit (BRT) alternatives, and one Commuter Rail Alternative. Together with the No-Build Alternative and Transportation System Management (TSM) Alternative, these alternatives represent the set of alternatives carried forward for conceptual definition and evaluation. This chapter defines the conceptual alternatives under consideration for scoping. A discussion of alternatives proposed by others and the results of a peer review of the range of alternatives developed also is included. The definitions provide a description of the physical, operating, and policy assumptions developed for each alternative. Conceptual plans showing the horizontal and vertical alignments on aerial photography and station/stop locations for the proposed transit improvements under No-Build, TSM, and build alternatives are contained in Appendix A, Conceptual Plans, of this report. The basis for the development of the transit service improvements included as part of the TSM and build alternatives was the identification of travel markets described in Chapter 1, Purpose and Need, of this report. Travel markets identify the origins, destinations, and types of trips to be served by the proposed transit improvements under the alternatives. -
Solicitation No. 11A3245 the Following Is the Table of Contents for the Small Business Minor B Package Documents
Solicitation No. 11A3245 The following is the Table of Contents for the Small Business Minor B Package documents: Table of Contents 1 Page Invitation for Price Quote–Cover Letter 1 Page General Bidders Instructions/Checklist 2 Pages Proposed Form of Agreement, STD. 213 2 Pages Specifications 23 Pages Revised Standard Specifications Applicable to the 2018 Edition of the Standard Specifications available at: Page 24 https://dot.ca.gov/programs/design/ccs-standard-plans-and-standard-specifications The Bid Package contains 7 Project Plans for this project. STATE OF CALIFORNIA------- CALIFORNIA STATE TRANSPORTATION AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATION DIVISION OF PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTS 1727 30th STREET, MS-65 SACRAMENTO, CA 95816-7006 PHONE (916) 227-6000 Making Conservation FAX (916) 227-6155 a California Way of Life. TTY 711 https://dot.ca.gov/programs/procurement-and-contracts/ Invitation for Price Quote (IFPQ) Contract No. 11A3245 Quote Due Date: May 21, 2021 Prospective Contractors: The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans/Department) has issued the enclosed Invitation for Price Quote (IFPQ) for services described in the enclosed proposed contract. Please read the entire contract package and all attachments carefully. If you desire to submit a quote, complete the Price Quote sheet and return the original in a sealed envelope. Your signature affixed to and dated on the quote proposal shall constitute a certification under penalty of perjury, unless exempted, that you have complied with the nondiscrimination program requirements of Government Code Section 12990 and Title 2, California Code of Regulations, Section 11102, and the nondiscrimination program requirements of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 21, and 23 CFR Part 200. -
San Diego History Center Is a Museum, Education Center, and Research Library Founded As the San Diego Historical Society in 1928
The Journal of San Diego Volume 61 Winter 2015 Numbers 1 • The Journal of San Diego History Diego San of Journal 1 • The Numbers 2015 Winter 61 Volume History Publication of The Journal of San Diego History is underwritten by a major grant from the Quest for Truth Foundation, established by the late James G. Scripps. Additional support is provided by “The Journal of San Diego History Fund” of the San Diego Foundation and private donors. The San Diego History Center is a museum, education center, and research library founded as the San Diego Historical Society in 1928. Its activities are supported by: the City of San Diego’s Commission for Arts and Culture; the County of San Diego; individuals; foundations; corporations; fund raising events; membership dues; admissions; shop sales; and rights and reproduction fees. Articles appearing in The Journal of San Diego History are abstracted and indexed in Historical Abstracts and America: History and Life. The paper in the publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Science-Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. Front Cover: Clockwise: Casa de Balboa—headquarters of the San Diego History Center in Balboa Park. Photo by Richard Benton. Back Cover: San Diego & Its Vicinity, 1915 inside advertisement. Courtesy of SDHC Research Archives. Design and Layout: Allen Wynar Printing: Crest Offset Printing Editorial Assistants: Travis Degheri Cynthia van Stralen Joey Seymour The Journal of San Diego History IRIS H. W. ENGSTRAND MOLLY McCLAIN Editors THEODORE STRATHMAN DAVID MILLER Review Editors Published since 1955 by the SAN DIEGO HISTORICAL SOCIETY 1649 El Prado, Balboa Park, San Diego, California 92101 ISSN 0022-4383 The Journal of San Diego History VOLUME 61 WINTER 2015 NUMBER 1 Editorial Consultants Published quarterly by the San Diego History Center at 1649 El Prado, Balboa MATTHEW BOKOVOY Park, San Diego, California 92101. -
Jill and Hank Chambers' San Diego Favorites
JILL AND HANK CHAMBERS’ SAN DIEGO FAVORITES We’ve personally eaten at all of these restaurants and recommend them to you. We’ve left off countless ones that weren’t so great and may not have visited some new great ones. There is a great map of San Diego in the Restaurant section of the Yellow Pages. Of course there is Google and Yahoo as well. Also there is a map and itinerary at the end of this list. (The numbers next to the restaurants refer to that map) Most of these will require reservations at least a few days in advance. However, if you use www.opentable.com, there are often reservations available even when the restaurant says that they don’t have any. Another great website for restaurants and other activities with review is: http://www.tripadvisor.com/Tourism-g60750-San_Diego_California- Vacations.html Pick up the ―Reader‖ at any supermarket or convenience store. It has the best list of what’s happening in San Diego or go online to http://www.sandiegoreader.com/home/ By the way an 858 prefix usually means north of the I-8, 619 south of the I-8 and 760 is North County Our City San Diego Magazine Favorites June 2009 Best Place to find your inner solitude: Mount Soledad Best Bookstore for Hour Long Lounging: Upstart Crow in Horton Plaza Best Place to Buy Healthy Food: Whole Foods Best Place to See the Sunset: La Jolla Shores Beach Best Place for a Solo Meal: Zenbu in LaJolla and Cardiff-by-the-Sea Best Healthy Restaurant: Tender Greens in Point Loma Liberty Station Best Place to Pamper Yourself: The Spa at Rancho Bernardo Inn Best Salon: MODA Hair Design 3754 Sixth Ave. -
SUPER LOOP TRANSIT PROJECT Final Negative Declaration/ Environmental Initial Study
SUPER LOOP TRANSIT PROJECT Final Negative Declaration/ Environmental Initial Study AUGUST 2007 401 B Street, Suite 800 • San Diego, CA 92101-4231 • (619) 699-1900 PREFACE This is a Final Negative Declaration (ND), prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), addressing potential environmental consequences of the implementation of the Super Loop in the City of San Diego. The Draft ND/Initial Study (IS) was circulated for public review from March 20March 19, 2007 to May 15, 2007 (State Clearinghouse No. 2007031104). During the pubic review period, several comments were received from public agencies, organizations and individuals. The comments, along with responses addressing the issues of concern, are provided following this preface. In response to comments received on the Draft ND, minor revisions have been made to the IS. Specifically, Figure 2 has been revised to clarify existing land uses in the project area, and Table 10 has been revised to clarify planned roadway improvements. Revisions to the text are shown in strikeout and underline; if no strikeout or underline is indicated, information remains unchanged. COMMENTS RESPONSES A1. Noise complaints or operational issues associated with the Super Loop should be directed to the Metropolitan Transit System at (619) 231-1466. A1 A2 A2. All potential users of parking are subject to the same, uniform regulations. Outside users are generally prohibited from using on-site (off-street) parking within residential communities. Residential complexes are generally required to supply sufficient parking to meet the needs of residences of communities, such that conflicts regarding on-street spaces are minimized. Control of on-street parking spaces is under the jurisdiction of the City of San Diego. -
Noise Analysis
NOISE ANALYSIS SUPER LOOP La Jolla, CA December 22, 2006 Prepared for: HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. 7578 El Cajon Boulevard, Suite 200 La Mesa, CA 91941 Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 517 4th Avenue, Suite 301 San Diego, CA 92101 ãKimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2006 NOISE ANALYSIS SUPER LOOP La Jolla, CA _____________________________________ Jeffrey D. Fuller, INCE, REHS Senior Project Manager _____________________________________ Steve Fiedler, INCE Project Acoustical Analyst Prepared for: HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. 7578 El Cajon Boulevard, Suite 200 La Mesa, CA 91941 ãKimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2006 December 22, 2006 095219008 Section 1 Introduction.................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Noise Background .............................................................................................1-1 1.2 Applicable Noise Standards ...............................................................................1-2 Section 2 Project Description ........................................................................................ 2-1 Section 3 Exterior Noise Environment.......................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Sound Level Measurements ...............................................................................3-1 3.2 Traffic Noise Analysis.......................................................................................3-4 Section 4 Mitigation....................................................................................................... -
The Golden Triangle 0
TheUCS n Diego / Volume 48, Number 4 / Thursday, January 13, 1983 The ~I fi" It :::> i " c Golden ~ 1\ ;z g; fi D : 0 Il Triangle II 11 II 11 ~ II \1 ~ il 11 Ie 11 U P il 1\ ~, ~ H" il ~ ~ ]1 ii ]l' \\ h 11 Ii 11 b 11 il 11 "\\ ~ U 11 if 11 ~~ P 11 Ii 11 11 II n "~ J/ it 1\ \\ Local developers send a message to UCSD By EILEEN MO RRIS and STEVE STOY ANOW Staff Writers "There's nothing on a UCSD. are not in the best and High way 52 on the south. - Lake at La Jolla Village. question the traffic \'olume railroad track here," Jim Hare interest of the university. He Developers have" named the 120 acres of residential units intenSl\-e de\"elopment would told six new members of the stresses that the realiza tion of area "the Golden Triangle," surrounding a 9 acre lake at bring (for example, La Jolla U n ivers it y Communit y these developments w ill because of its money-making Nobel and TO\\ ne Center Village Dr. currentl} handles Planning Group Tuesday constitute a betrayal by the potential, a potential. they Drive around 32,000 cars per day night. Hare, a community city of San Diego of an claim, that commercial and - Plaza at La Jolla Village. a With dewlopmem. the \"Illume planner for the city of an agreement entered into with industrial development would commercial residential pro would Increase to around Diego , was referring to the the university in 1959, to the serve better than exclusivelv ject at the northeast corner of 65.000 per day). -
Pacific Beach Corridor Study Final Report
Paciϐic Beach Corridor Study Final Report - January 2017 SKYWAY LIGHT RAIL Prepared by: In Association with: Prepared for: CHS • KTU+A • CUP • HELIX • AECOM SANDAG Pacific Beach Corridor Study Final Report January 2017 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 3 2.0 Summary of Findings .............................................................................................................................. 4 3.0 Background of the Study Area ............................................................................................................... 3 3.1 Topography and Demography ........................................................................................................... 3 3.2 Circulation System.............................................................................................................................. 4 3.3 Transit System .................................................................................................................................... 5 3.4 Grand Avenue Alignment ................................................................................................................... 6 3.5 Environmental Conditions .................................................................................................................. 7 3.6 Geotechnical Conditions ................................................................................................................... -
SAFETY ELEMENT Table of Contents
La Mesa General Plan 2012 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE SAFETY ELEMENT Table of Contents Vision ........................................................................................................... SE-1 Introduction ................................................................................................. SE-1 Purpose ........................................................................................................ SE-1 Hazard Mitigation Plan ......................................................................................................... SE-2 Organization and Content ............................................................................ SE-2 Relationship to Other General Plan Elements .............................................. SE-3 Flood Hazard ............................................................................................... SE-3 Drainage Patterns .................................................................................................................. SE-4 Seismic Hazard ..................................................................................................................... SE-7 Local Conditions ................................................................................................................... SE-8 Landslides .................................................................................................. SE-14 Local Conditions ................................................................................................................. SE-15 Fire Hazard -
Construction Update – February 19, 2019 PROJECT OVERVIEW
Construction Update – February 19, 2019 PROJECT OVERVIEW 11-mile extension of Trolley Blue Line Old Town Transit Center to Westfield UTC 9 new stations (5 with parking) 36 trolley cars CONSTRUCTION OVERVIEW Relocate Build supporting Construct stations, Install track Testing and utilities infrastructure bridges and viaduct and power start-up San Diego River Bridge January 2018 January 2019 Storm Drain Installation near Tecolote Road Tecolote Road Station Site Tecolote Road Station Site 280 surface parking spaces for transit riders Tecolote Road and W. Morena Boulevard Clairemont Drive Station Site Future Development 150 surface parking spaces for transit riders Clairemont Drive Station / Morena Boulevard Morena Boulevard and Clairemont Drive Station Balboa Avenue Station Site 220 surface parking spaces for transit riders Kiss-and-ride drop-off / pick-up area 5 bus bays within station + 1-2 along Morena Blvd Pedestrian access from both sides of Balboa Ave Electric Vehicle Charging Stations Bicycle parking facilities 1-5 Off-ramp and Balboa Avenue Station Construction Update 1-5 Off-ramp to Balboa Avenue Work Area and Detour Map Balboa Avenue Bridges Retaining Wall north of Balboa Avenue Retaining Wall under SR-52 Retaining Wall at La Jolla Colony Mid-Coast – UCSD Viaduct Rose Creek Bikeway Absolute Work Windows (AWWs) • Select weekends where all rail service is suspended • Allows critical project milestones to be met • Reduces overall project schedule and budget • Ensures construction crew safety • Work competed during AWWs could include: o Rail replacement and repair o Replacement of rail ties o Bridge repair o Rail resurfacing o Undercrossing installation Rose Creek Flyover OH LRT - AWW Bent Cap 10 Bent Cap 7 Feb 9 & 10 AWW: • removed bent 7 falsework • erected bent 8 & 9 falsework Genesee Avenue / La Jolla Village Drive Girder Installation Contact Us [email protected] (877) 379-0110 KeepSanDiegoMoving.com/MidCoast Mid-Coast Trolley @MidCoastTrolley.