DOCSLIB.ORG

APPENDIX G Cultural Resources Inventory and Site Evaluation Reports

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
APPENDIX G Cultural Resources Inventory and Site Evaluation Reports APPENDIX G Cultural Resources Inventory and Site Evaluation Reports PG&E Strength Testing and ILI June 2018 for Lines 300A, 300B, 311 and 311-1 Environmental Assessment Cultural Resources Inventory and Site Evaluations in Support of the Proposed Hydrostatic Testing of Line 300, San Bernardino County, California By: Ryan M. Byerly Sharon A. Waechter Kaely Colligan Gina Caretti Courtney R. Higgins Kimberley Carpenter May 2018 FINAL Submitted to: Bureau of Land Management California District Office 22835 Calle San Juan de los Lagos Moreno Valley, CA 92553 On behalf of: Pacific Gas and Electric Company 245 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105 FAR WESTERN ANTHROPOLOGICAL RESEARCH GROUP, INC. 2727 Del Rio Place, Suite A, Davis, California, 95618 http://www.farwestern.com 530-756-3941 Confidential Information – Not for Public Distribution Confidential Information – Not for Public Distribution Cultural Resources Inventory and Site Evaluations in Support of the Proposed Hydrostatic Testing of Line 300, San Bernardino County, California By: Ryan M. Byerly Sharon A. Waechter Kaely Colligan Gina Caretti Courtney R. Higgins Kimberley Carpenter Contributions by: William Hildebrandt Jack Meyer Sarah K. Rice Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Inc. Mary L. Maniery PAR Environmental Services, Inc. May 2018 FINAL Submitted to: Bureau of Land Management California District Office 22835 Calle San Juan de los Lagos Moreno Valley, CA 92553 On Behalf of: Pacific Gas and Electric Company 245 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Confidential Information – Not for Public Distribution Confidential Information – Not for Public Distribution MANAGEMENT SUMMARY Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) proposes to conduct hydrostatic strength tests for existing high pressure natural gas transmission lines denoted L-300 (including parallel Lines 300A and 300B; see ahead to Figure 1). The segments of Line 300 to be tested are in San Bernardino County, crossing lands primarily administered by the Barstow and Needles Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Field Offices. The project areas are within or intersect lands managed by federal, state, and local agencies and thus require compliance with (1) Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (36 CFR § 800, revised 2004); and (2) the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources code, Section 21000 et seq., revised 2005), which mandates federal and California public agencies to consider the effects of projects on historic properties. As the Federal Lead Agency for the project, the BLM required a Class III cultural resources inventory of those portions of the project area that have not been previously examined, or which have not been examined in a manner that reflects current standards, to meet Section 106 review and compliance obligations. They also required National Register of Historic Places (National Register) evaluations of all resources which intersect the project’s Area of Potential Effects (APE). Line 300 extends west-east, roughly paralleling State Route 66 and US Highway 40 between Needles, to just east of Daggett, California. This project area is composed of 96 consolidated work locations (including bell holes, laydown areas, staging yards, and in-line [ILI] inspection locations) and roughly 103 miles of extant access roads and planned bridge bypass routes. The L-300 APE was developed in consultation with BLM to include 50-meter peripheral buffers around work locations, and 15 meters off either edge of access roads and bridge bypasses. The APE incorporates approximately 5,293 acres. This report describes cultural resources that intersect the L-300 project APE. National Register and California Register of Historical Resources (California Register) eligibility assessments for these resources are also provided. Evaluations are based on survey-level data collected by Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Inc., (Far Western) between February 16, and March 6, 2018. Results include site record updates for 90 previously recorded sites and documentation of 99 newly recorded sites. The 99 newly found sites, include 19 prehistoric resources, four multicomponent, and 76 dating to the historic era, were documented and assessed for eligibility during the current project. Newly recorded historic-era sites include: the Essex townsite; a foundation; four mining sites; two railroad grades; 51 refuse deposits (of which seven are associated with other historical features or prehistoric isolated artifacts); seven road segments; eight rock feature sites (mining or recreation related); a telegraph line; and a late nineteenth- century Chinese worker’s camp. These variably date between the late nineteenth and mid- to late twentieth century. The historical components among multicomponent sites include foundations associated with refuse, two other refuse deposits, and a road segment. Prehistoric sites include a complex occupation with charcoal visibly surrounding surface ground stone, eight campsites (of which two also contain fire-altered rock [FAR]), five lithic reduction stations, and five pavement quarries or single segregated reduction locations (SRLs) surrounded by diffuse debitage scatters. Among multicomponent sites, prehistoric components include two campsites, a pavement quarry, and a lithic reduction station. Temporally diagnostic prehistoric artifacts were not found with any of these prehistoric components, although the complex occupation and two campsites with FAR have the potential to yield direct dates. Of the 189 total, 11 sites are recommended eligible or have eligible components/elements (SBR- 1908/H, -2340H, -4165H, -13115H, -13116H, -13117H, -15114H, -15440/H, P-36-027752, P-36-027757, and SN- Cultural Resources Inventory and Site Evaluations i Far Western in Support of the Proposed Hydrostatic Testing of Line 300, San Bernardino County, California Confidential Information – Not for Public Distribution X13); three others have been previously determined eligible or are associated with components/elements that have (SBR-2910H, -5794/13126/H, and -6693H). In all, 135 sites are wholly ineligible, have ineligible components, or have components/elements that require further research (SBR-2084/H, -3076, -4681, -5797, -6404H, -6515, -6530H, -10637, -10650H, -11583H, -11586H, -12918H, -12999H, -13038/13040/H, -13041, -13101/H, -13103/H, -13114H, -13118H, -13119H, -13619H, -13768, 15115H, -15439, -16742H, -16759H, -16782, -16784H, -16785, -16786H, -17101H, -29795H, -29796H, -29798H, -31747H, P-36-020271, -026456, -026459, -026460, -026468, -026469, -026470, -026490, -026491, -026492, -026493, -026494, -026496, -026499, -026518, -026519, -026532, -026541, -026542, -026543, AU-X1, AU-X2, AU-X3, EG-X10, EG-X11, EG-X12, EG-X13, EG-X15, EG-X17, EG-X20, EG-X21, EG-X22, EG-X23, EG-X24, EG-X25, EG-X26, EG-X27, EG-X28, EG-X29, EG-X31, EM-X16, EM-X17, EM-X18, EM-X19, EM-X20, EM-X21, EM-X22, EM-X23, EM-X26, EM-X27, EM-X28, EM-X29, EM-X32, EM-X33, EM-X34, EM-X35, EM-X36, EM-X38, EM-X39, EM-X40, EM-X41, EM-X42, EM-X43, EM-X44, EM-X46, EM-X47, EM-X48, EM-X49, EM-X50, EM-X53, EM-X55, EM-X56, EM-X57, EM-X58, KR-X1, MM-X1, NS-X1, NS-X2, RB-X10, RB-X12, RB-X13, SN-X14, SN-X15, SN-X16, SN-X17, SN-X19, SN-X20, SN-X22, SN-X23, SN-X24, SN-X27, SN-X29, SR-X6, SR-X7, SR-X8, SR-X10, SR-X11, SR-X12, SR-X13, and SR-X14). A total of 32 sites require further research to make eligibility determination (SBR-2328/H, -3276H, -3277H, -3278H, -3284H, -8920H, -13449/H, -15443/H, -15857H, -16773, -16787H, P-36-026486, -026495, -027530, EG-X7, EG-X8, EG-X9, EG-X14, EG-X16, EG-X18, EG-X19, EG-X30, EM-X24, EM-X25, EM-X30, EM- X31, EM-X37, EM-X45, RB-X2, RB-X6, RB-X11, and SR-X15). Eight prehistoric sites could not be re-located, are presumed destroyed and no further management is necessary (SBR-1804, -5798, -5799, -5800, -5801, -5807, -5808, and -10649). Included among these 32 is SBR-3284H (i.e., Amboy), for which a previous portion and the current APE are considered ineligible or non-contributing portions, although, the site, as a whole, remains unevaluated and requires further research to assess listing potential. No further management is recommended for all previously recorded/updated and newly recorded sites, or for those segments of extensive linears that intersect the project APE recommended ineligible for listing. No further management is also required for the eight sites which could not be relocated. No further management is also recommended for the 215 isolates newly found during the current study. Temporary construction fencing is recommended for portions of all sites intersecting the current project APE that are recommended/determined eligible or for which further research is necessary to assess eligibility. For those sites requiring further research intersected by proposed access roads, the road margin should be fenced for protection beginning 100 feet before the site boundary and ending 100 feet after the site boundary. Otherwise, temporary construction fencing should be placed around the APE-intersected boundaries of eligible sites, site components/elements, and those requiring further research to mitigate potential effects from proposed project work. The buried site sensitivity assessment indicates that work areas modeled to have high to moderate sensitivity are all in the far western portions of L-300 and include, from west to east: (1) all of Location T-1225 N/T-1229 N; (2) the southern third of Location T-1225 Q/T-1229 M; (3) the first roughly one-kilometer start of the access road west of Location T-1225 L/T-1229 K; (4) a sliver of the northwestern portion of T-1225 L/T-1229 K; and (5) the southern on-third of Location T-1225 K. Excavations in these work areas should be monitored by a qualified archaeologist. As detailed in Chapter 7, two previously recorded campsites were newly recorded in Location T-1225 N/T-1229 N (i.e., EG-X7 and EG-X8); a previously recorded lithic reduction station is within the first roughly 1-kilometer start of the access road west of Location T-1225 L/T-1229 K (i.e., P-36-026488 [no trinomial assigned]); a new campsite (RB-X2) was found outside of the APE of the northwestern portion of T-1225 L/T-1229 K.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Redalyc.Géneros De Lamiaceae De México, Diversidad Y Endemismo
    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad ISSN: 1870-3453 [email protected] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México México Martínez-Gordillo, Martha; Fragoso-Martínez, Itzi; García-Peña, María del Rosario; Montiel, Oscar Géneros de Lamiaceae de México, diversidad y endemismo Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, vol. 84, núm. 1, marzo, 2013, pp. 30-86 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Distrito Federal, México Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=42526150034 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 84: 30-86, 2013 DOI: 10.7550/rmb.30158 Géneros de Lamiaceae de México, diversidad y endemismo Genera of Lamiaceae from Mexico, diversity and endemism Martha Martínez-Gordillo1, Itzi Fragoso-Martínez1, María del Rosario García-Peña2 y Oscar Montiel1 1Herbario de la Facultad de Ciencias, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. partado postal 70-399, 04510 México, D.F., México. 2Herbario Nacional de México, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Apartado postal 70-367, 04510 México, D.F., México. [email protected] Resumen. La familia Lamiaceae es muy diversa en México y se distribuye con preferencia en las zonas templadas, aunque es posible encontrar géneros como Hyptis y Asterohyptis, que habitan en zonas secas y calientes; es una de las familias más diversas en el país, de la cual no se tenían datos actualizados sobre su diversidad y endemismo.
    [Show full text]
  • The Grand Canyon of the Mojave.” It Was Originally Called Cave Canyon, but Acquire the Current Name After the Railroad Stop of Afton Was Created at the West End
    Afton Canyon: Afton Canyon is often called “the Grand Canyon of the Mojave.” It was originally called Cave Canyon, but acquire the current name after the railroad stop of Afton was created at the west end. It’s one of the few places where the Mojave River flows above ground in places all year round. Vehicle access is permitted through most of the canyon, however no vehicles are allowed in the western end, where the “horseshoe” is and where the caves are located. This closed area is bypassed by taking the access road along the railroad tracks and driving through the Mojave River wash under the railroad tressel. At one time there was a train stop at Afton and a station. Afton Cemetery is located south of where the station once sat. There are five stone-covered mounds and wooden crosses. One of the burials has been identified as that of Jose Flores, born about 1882, died May 29, 1906. Flores was one of three men who arrived at Afton Station on an early-morning train hoping to be hired on. They were intoxicated and after attacking Section Foreman Robert Y. Williams, who was severely injured in the brawl, Flores was killed. The other two were wounded, one fatally. [John V. Richardson, Jr., San Bernardino County Museum Association Quarterly, Vol. 55, Number 4, 2010]. MojaveRd1West Pages 5, 6. GPS: 35.030936,-116.366846 Arbuckle Mine: A magnesite (magnesium) mine high up on the side of a cliff on the south side of Afton Canyon. A large piece of timber at the mine has "Arbuckle Mine 1894" carved into it.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Visitors and Recreation Impacts: Baseline Data Available for Twentieth Century Conditions
    United States Department of Agriculture Wilderness Visitors and Forest Service Recreation Impacts: Baseline Rocky Mountain Research Station Data Available for Twentieth General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-117 Century Conditions September 2003 David N. Cole Vita Wright Abstract __________________________________________ Cole, David N.; Wright, Vita. 2003. Wilderness visitors and recreation impacts: baseline data available for twentieth century conditions. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-117. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 52 p. This report provides an assessment and compilation of recreation-related monitoring data sources across the National Wilderness Preservation System (NWPS). Telephone interviews with managers of all units of the NWPS and a literature search were conducted to locate studies that provide campsite impact data, trail impact data, and information about visitor characteristics. Of the 628 wildernesses that comprised the NWPS in January 2000, 51 percent had baseline campsite data, 9 percent had trail condition data and 24 percent had data on visitor characteristics. Wildernesses managed by the Forest Service and National Park Service were much more likely to have data than wildernesses managed by the Bureau of Land Management and Fish and Wildlife Service. Both unpublished data collected by the management agencies and data published in reports are included. Extensive appendices provide detailed information about available data for every study that we located. These have been organized by wilderness so that it is easy to locate all the information available for each wilderness in the NWPS. Keywords: campsite condition, monitoring, National Wilderness Preservation System, trail condition, visitor characteristics The Authors _______________________________________ David N.
    [Show full text]
  • 800/834-7557
    Searles Valley Delano Kernville 178 Death Valley 155 National Monument Delano Munipal 155 China Lake Naval Airport Weapons Ctr 99 Woody Rd na 155 Wofford Heights Tro 65 Ridgecrest Inyokern 38 China Lake 155 Mcfarland 178 178 178 178 99 178 Ridgecrest d South Lake 14 an R Bowm E Mountain Mesa 127 Lake Isabella Famoso Woody Rd Bodfish Cerro Coso Junior College y w H e l l i v r China Lake Naval e t r o d P Weapons Ctr R n tio ta S s e rl 395 a e S 43 Shafter-Minter 65 Field 178 Shafter y w H 99 e l l i G v o r l e d t en r S o ta P te H wy Meadows d R a Field Kern River n o 44 r State Park T Oildale ll rre Fort Irwin Ha red Alf wy H Garlock Rio Bravo Country Club Red Rock Canyon Red 178 State Rec Area Rosedale Mountain Randsburg 58 184 Greenacres 14 Bakersfield 43 Cantil Baker 43 Bakersfield Municipal Airport ck ba 58 de ud C d R Lamont A W Noon Weedpatch Park Galileo 5 Park South Co lumbi a Rd d lv B d ir 223 rb 223 46 de un h Arvin T Borax Bill Merrick Blvd 395 C Park h ick Blvd ip Rudn a California n g Um rd Ave a tali Rd Stanfo li City ey Rd S Vall t Bear 14 r d B Gordon Blvd e R e a w y r o le V 184 L l a dberg Blvd d a ll Lin rge Blv V ey Geo Cumberland R d buru Rd Rd v u Rd Mendi d W l Mendibur d B e d R Golden s v n y l e B t ppy Blvd N Loop Blvd l w o Po l B a r a lv o l b a V Hills d d l r o r v e a Bear Valley Springs B l e d e rnia City Blvd h B Califo B 204 Y dsburg Cutoff c C Ran t i a t Teha reat Circle Dr S Loop Blvd li chap M G fo i d S Blvd r 202 Valley Blvd v n l y d ia r r v Blvd B r Redwood l C 99 u D i n t B y i l
    [Show full text]
  • No. 40. the System of Lunar Craters, Quadrant Ii Alice P
    NO. 40. THE SYSTEM OF LUNAR CRATERS, QUADRANT II by D. W. G. ARTHUR, ALICE P. AGNIERAY, RUTH A. HORVATH ,tl l C.A. WOOD AND C. R. CHAPMAN \_9 (_ /_) March 14, 1964 ABSTRACT The designation, diameter, position, central-peak information, and state of completeness arc listed for each discernible crater in the second lunar quadrant with a diameter exceeding 3.5 km. The catalog contains more than 2,000 items and is illustrated by a map in 11 sections. his Communication is the second part of The However, since we also have suppressed many Greek System of Lunar Craters, which is a catalog in letters used by these authorities, there was need for four parts of all craters recognizable with reasonable some care in the incorporation of new letters to certainty on photographs and having diameters avoid confusion. Accordingly, the Greek letters greater than 3.5 kilometers. Thus it is a continua- added by us are always different from those that tion of Comm. LPL No. 30 of September 1963. The have been suppressed. Observers who wish may use format is the same except for some minor changes the omitted symbols of Blagg and Miiller without to improve clarity and legibility. The information in fear of ambiguity. the text of Comm. LPL No. 30 therefore applies to The photographic coverage of the second quad- this Communication also. rant is by no means uniform in quality, and certain Some of the minor changes mentioned above phases are not well represented. Thus for small cra- have been introduced because of the particular ters in certain longitudes there are no good determi- nature of the second lunar quadrant, most of which nations of the diameters, and our values are little is covered by the dark areas Mare Imbrium and better than rough estimates.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary Glossary
    Glossary Glossary Albedo A measure of an object’s reflectivity. A pure white reflecting surface has an albedo of 1.0 (100%). A pitch-black, nonreflecting surface has an albedo of 0.0. The Moon is a fairly dark object with a combined albedo of 0.07 (reflecting 7% of the sunlight that falls upon it). The albedo range of the lunar maria is between 0.05 and 0.08. The brighter highlands have an albedo range from 0.09 to 0.15. Anorthosite Rocks rich in the mineral feldspar, making up much of the Moon’s bright highland regions. Aperture The diameter of a telescope’s objective lens or primary mirror. Apogee The point in the Moon’s orbit where it is furthest from the Earth. At apogee, the Moon can reach a maximum distance of 406,700 km from the Earth. Apollo The manned lunar program of the United States. Between July 1969 and December 1972, six Apollo missions landed on the Moon, allowing a total of 12 astronauts to explore its surface. Asteroid A minor planet. A large solid body of rock in orbit around the Sun. Banded crater A crater that displays dusky linear tracts on its inner walls and/or floor. 250 Basalt A dark, fine-grained volcanic rock, low in silicon, with a low viscosity. Basaltic material fills many of the Moon’s major basins, especially on the near side. Glossary Basin A very large circular impact structure (usually comprising multiple concentric rings) that usually displays some degree of flooding with lava. The largest and most conspicuous lava- flooded basins on the Moon are found on the near side, and most are filled to their outer edges with mare basalts.
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Abstracts: Studying Old Master Paintings
    BOOK OF ABSTRACTS STUDYING OLD MASTER PAINTINGS ­ TECHNOLOGY AND PRACTICE THE NATIONAL GALLERY TECHNICAL BULLETIN 30TH ANNIVERSARY CONFERENCE 16­18 September 2009, Sainsbury Wing Theatre, National Gallery, London Supported by The Elizabeth Cayzer Charitable Trust STUDYING OLD MASTER PAINTINGS ­ TECHNOLOGY AND PRACTICE THE NATIONAL GALLERY TECHNICAL BULLETIN 30TH ANNIVERSARY CONFERENCE BOOK OF ABSTRACTS 16­18 September 2009 Sainsbury Wing Theatre, National Gallery, London The Proceedings of this Conference will be published by Archetype Publications, London in 2010 Contents Presentations Page Presentations (cont’d) Page The Paliotto by Guido da Siena from the Pinacoteca Nazionale of Siena 3 The rediscovery of sublimated arsenic sulphide pigments in painting 25 Marco Ciatti, Roberto Bellucci, Cecilia Frosinini, Linda Lucarelli, Luciano Sostegni, and polychromy: Applications of Raman microspectroscopy Camilla Fracassi, Carlo Lalli Günter Grundmann, Natalia Ivleva, Mark Richter, Heike Stege, Christoph Haisch Painting on parchment and panels: An exploration of Pacino di 5 The use of blue and green verditer in green colours in seventeenth­century 27 Bonaguida’s technique Netherlandish painting practice Carole Namowicz, Catherine M. Schmidt, Christine Sciacca, Yvonne Szafran, Annelies van Loon, Lidwein Speleers Karen Trentelman, Nancy Turner Alterations in paintings: From non­invasive in­situ assessment to 29 Technical similarities between mural painting and panel painting in 7 laboratory research the works of Giovanni da Milano: The Rinuccini
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 General Plan
    CITY OF CALIMESA 2014 GENERAL PLAN ADOPTED AUGUST 4, 2014 CITY OF CALIMESA 2014 GENERAL PLAN ADOPTED AUGUST 4, 2014 Prepared by the City of Calimesa General Plan Advisory Committee and ® City of Calimesa 908 Park Avenue Calimesa, CA 92320 909.795.9801 This document is available for electronic download at http://cityofcalimesa.net The preparation of this General Plan was funded in whole or in part through a grant awarded by the Strategic Growth Council The statements and conclusions of this report are those of the City of Calimesa and not necessarily those of the Strategic Growth Council or of the Department of Conservation, or its employees. The Strategic Growth Council and the Department make no warranties, expressed or implied, and assume no liability for the information contained in the succeeding text. Chapter 1: Introduction Chapter 2: Land Use Chapter 3: Transportation and Mobility Chapter 4: Infrastructure and Public Services Chapter 5: Housing Element Chapter 6: Resource Management Chapter 7: Open Space, Parks, and Recreation Chapter 8: Safety Chapter 9: Noise Chapter 10: Air Quality Chapter 11: Sustainability Appendix A: Housing Element Background Report - under separate cover Chapter 1: Introduction Chapter 2: Land Use Chapter 3: Transportation and Mobility Chapter 7: Open Space, Parks, and Recreation Chapter 8: Safety Chapter 2: Land Use Chapter 3: Transportation and Mobility Chapter 5: Housing Element Chapter 9: Noise Chapter 10: Air Quality CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION The Calimesa General Plan expresses our community’s vision of its long-term physical form and development. This General Plan is comprehensive in scope and represents the product of years of effort on the part of residents and businesses in the community working to maintain and improve Calimesa’s quality of life and implement the community’s shared vision for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Mojave National Preserve: Administrative History
    Mojave National Preserve: Administrative History Mojave Administrative History From Neglected Space To Protected Place: An Administrative History of Mojave National Preserve by Eric Charles Nystrom March 2003 Prepared for: United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Mojave National Preserve Great Basin CESU Cooperative Agreement H8R0701001 TABLE OF CONTENTS moja/adhi/adhi.htm Last Updated: 05-Apr-2005 http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/moja/adhi/adhi.htm[8/6/2013 5:32:15 PM] Mojave National Preserve: Administrative History (Table of Contents) Mojave Administrative History TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER ACKNOWLEDGMENTS LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION CHAPTER TWO: PRELUDE TO SYSTEMATIC FEDERAL MANAGEMENT Native Americans and Anglo Contact Grazing Mining Railroads Homesteading Modern Roads and Rights of Way Modern Military Training Recreation CHAPTER THREE: BLM MANAGEMENT IN THE EAST MOJAVE FLPMA and the Desert Plan The East Mojave National Scenic Area and the Genesis of the CDPA The Political Battle Over the CDPA CHAPTER FOUR: AN AWKWARD START AND THREATS OF AN EARLY END The Dollar Budget CHAPTER FIVE: PLANNING FOR MOJAVE'S FUTURE CHAPTER SIX: PARK MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION CHAPTER SEVEN: VISITOR SERVICES Resource and Visitor Protection Interpretation CHAPTER EIGHT: RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Natural Resources http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/moja/adhi/adhit.htm[8/6/2013 5:32:17 PM] Mojave National Preserve: Administrative History (Table of Contents) Cultural Resources CHAPTER NINE: FUTURES BIBLIOGRAPHY FOOTNOTES INDEX (omitted from the online edition) LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Illustration 1 - Joshua tree and buckhorn cholla Illustration 2 - Prehistoric petroglyphs at Indian Well Illustration 3 - The 7IL Ranch Illustration 4 - Stone walls of 1880s-era Providence Illustration 5 - U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • General Disclaimer One Or More of the Following Statements May Affect
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19710025504 2020-03-11T22:36:49+00:00Z View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NASA Technical Reports Server General Disclaimer One or more of the Following Statements may affect this Document This document has been reproduced from the best copy furnished by the organizational source. It is being released in the interest of making available as much information as possible. This document may contain data, which exceeds the sheet parameters. It was furnished in this condition by the organizational source and is the best copy available. This document may contain tone-on-tone or color graphs, charts and/or pictures, which have been reproduced in black and white. This document is paginated as submitted by the original source. Portions of this document are not fully legible due to the historical nature of some of the material. However, it is the best reproduction available from the original submission. Produced by the NASA Center for Aerospace Information (CASI) 6 X t B ICC"m date: July 16, 1971 955 L'Enfant Plaza North, S. W Washington, D. C. 20024 to Distribution B71 07023 from. J. W. Head suhiecf Derivation of Topographic Feature Names in the Apollo 15 Landing Region - Case 340 ABSTRACT The topographic features in the region of the Apollo 15 landing site (Figure 1) are named for a number of philosophers, explorers and scientists (astronomers in particular) representing periods throughout recorded history. It is of particular interest that several of the individuals were responsible for specific discoveries, observations, or inventions which considerably advanced the study and under- standing of the moon (for instance, Hadley designed the first large reflecting telescope; Beer published classic maps and explanations of the moon's surface).
    [Show full text]
  • The Desert Serrano of the Mojave River
    The Desert Serrano of the Mojave River Mark Q. Sutton and David D. Earle Abstract century, although he noted the possible survival of The Desert Serrano of the Mojave River, little documented by “perhaps a few individuals merged among other twentieth century ethnographers, are investigated here to help un- groups” (Kroeber 1925:614). In fact, while occupation derstand their relationship with the larger and better known Moun- tain Serrano sociopolitical entity and to illuminate their unique of the Mojave River region by territorially based clan adaptation to the Mojave River and surrounding areas. In this effort communities of the Desert Serrano had ceased before new interpretations of recent and older data sets are employed. 1850, there were survivors of this group who had Kroeber proposed linguistic and cultural relationships between the been born in the desert still living at the close of the inhabitants of the Mojave River, whom he called the Vanyumé, and the Mountain Serrano living along the southern edge of the Mojave nineteenth century, as was later reported by Kroeber Desert, but the nature of those relationships was unclear. New (1959:299; also see Earle 2005:24–26). evidence on the political geography and social organization of this riverine group clarifies that they and the Mountain Serrano belonged to the same ethnic group, although the adaptation of the Desert For these reasons we attempt an “ethnography” of the Serrano was focused on riverine and desert resources. Unlike the Desert Serrano living along the Mojave River so that Mountain Serrano, the Desert Serrano participated in the exchange their place in the cultural milieu of southern Califor- system between California and the Southwest that passed through the territory of the Mojave on the Colorado River and cooperated nia can be better understood and appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • Program of the 75Th Anniversary Meeting
    PROGRAM OF THE 75 TH ANNIVERSARY MEETING April 14−April 18, 2010 St. Louis, Missouri THE ANNUAL MEETING of the Society for American Archaeology provides a forum for the dissemination of knowledge and discussion. The views expressed at the sessions are solely those of the speakers and the Society does not endorse, approve, or censor them. Descriptions of events and titles are those of the organizers, not the Society. Program of the 75th Anniversary Meeting Published by the Society for American Archaeology 900 Second Street NE, Suite 12 Washington DC 20002-3560 USA Tel: +1 202/789-8200 Fax: +1 202/789-0284 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://www.saa.org Copyright © 2010 Society for American Archaeology. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted in any form or by any means without prior permission from the publisher. Program of the 75th Anniversary Meeting 3 Contents 4............... Awards Presentation & Annual Business Meeting Agenda 5……….….2010 Award Recipients 10.................Maps of the America’s Center 12 ................Maps of Renaissance Grand St. Louis 14 ................Meeting Organizers, SAA Board of Directors, & SAA Staff 15 .............. General Information 18. ............. Featured Sessions 20 .............. Summary Schedule 25 .............. A Word about the Sessions 27............... Program 161................SAA Awards, Scholarships, & Fellowships 167............... Presidents of SAA . 168............... Annual Meeting Sites 169............... Exhibit Map 170................Exhibitor Directory 180................SAA Committees and Task Forces 184………….Index of participants 4 Program of the 75th Anniversary Meeting Awards Presentation & Annual Business Meeting America’s Center APRIL 16, 2010 5 PM Call to Order Call for Approval of Minutes of the 2009 Annual Business Meeting Remarks President Margaret W.
    [Show full text]