DOCSLIB.ORG

En En Amendments 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
En En Amendments 1 European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Foreign Affairs 2019/2210(INI) 2.3.2020 AMENDMENTS 1 - 376 Draft report Tonino Picula (PE646.913v01-00) on a European Parliament recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on the Western Balkans, in the run-up to the 2020 summit (2019/2210(INI)) AM\1200111EN.docx PE648.421v01-00 EN United in diversityEN AM_Com_NonLegReport PE648.421v01-00 2/158 AM\1200111EN.docx EN Amendment 1 Marco Zanni Motion for a resolution Citation 2 Motion for a resolution Amendment – having regard to its resolution of deleted 24 October 2019 on opening accession negotiations with North Macedonia and Albania1 , __________________ 1 Texts adopted, P9_TA(2019)0050. Or. it Amendment 2 Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Hilde Vautmans, Michal Šimečka, Urmas Paet, Nathalie Loiseau, Petras Auštrevičius Motion for a resolution Citation 3 Motion for a resolution Amendment – having regard to the Final – having regard to the Final Agreement for the Settlement of the Agreement for the Settlement of the Differences as described in the UN Differences as described in the UN Security Council resolutions 817 (1993) Security Council resolutions 817 (1993) and 845 (1993), the termination of the and 845 (1993), the termination of the Interim Accord of 1995 and the Interim Accord of 1995 and the establishment of a Strategic Partnership on establishment of a Strategic Partnership on 17 June 2018 between Greece and the 17 June 2018 between Greece and North former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Macedonia, also known as the Prespa also known as the Prespa Agreement, Agreement, Or. en Amendment 3 Tonino Picula Motion for a resolution Citation 3 AM\1200111EN.docx 3/158 PE648.421v01-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment – having regard to the Final – having regard to the Final Agreement for the Settlement of the Agreement for the Settlement of the Differences as described in the UN Differences as described in the UN Security Council resolutions 817 (1993) Security Council resolutions 817 (1993) and 845 (1993), the termination of the and 845 (1993), the termination of the Interim Accord of 1995 and the Interim Accord of 1995 and the establishment of a Strategic Partnership on establishment of a Strategic Partnership on 17 June 2018 between Greece and the 17 June 2018 between Greece and North former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Macedonia, also known as the Prespa also known as the Prespa Agreement, Agreement, Or. en Amendment 4 Nikos Androulakis, Demetris Papadakis Motion for a resolution Citation 11 Motion for a resolution Amendment – having regard to the Presidency – having regard to the Presidency conclusions of the Thessaloniki European conclusions of the Thessaloniki European Council of 19 and 20 June 2003 concerning Council of 19 and 20 June 2003 and the the prospect of the Western Balkan EU - Western Balkans Summit countries joining the European Union, Declaration of Thessaloniki of 21 June 2003, concerning the prospect of the Western Balkan countries joining the European Union, Or. en Amendment 5 Manolis Kefalogiannis Motion for a resolution Citation 11 Motion for a resolution Amendment – having regard to the Presidency – having regard to the EU-Western conclusions of the Thessaloniki European Balkans Summit Declaration of PE648.421v01-00 4/158 AM\1200111EN.docx EN Council of 19 and 20 June 2003 Thessaloniki, 21 June 2003, concerning the concerning the prospect of the Western prospect of the Western Balkans joining Balkan countries joining the European the European Union, Union, Or. en Amendment 6 Vangelis Meimarakis, Manolis Kefalogiannis, Elissavet Vozemberg-Vrionidi, Stelios Kympouropoulos, Anna-Michelle Asimakopoulou, Georgios Kyrtsos, Theodoros Zagorakis, Loucas Fourlas, Lefteris Christoforou, Maria Spyraki Motion for a resolution Citation 11 Motion for a resolution Amendment – having regard to the Presidency – having regard to the EU-Western conclusions of the Thessaloniki European Balkans Summit Declaration of Council of 19 and 20 June 2003 Thessaloniki, 21 June 2003, concerning the concerning the prospect of the Western prospect of the Western Balkans joining Balkan countries joining the European the European Union, Union, Or. en Amendment 7 Tanja Fajon, Andreas Schieder, Robert Hajšel, Juozas Olekas, Nikos Androulakis Motion for a resolution Citation 11 a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment – having regard to the conclusions of the 2003rd Council meeting on the application of conditionality with a view to developing a coherent EU-strategy for the relations with the countries in the region of 29/30 April 1997, Or. en AM\1200111EN.docx 5/158 PE648.421v01-00 EN Amendment 8 Viola Von Cramon-Taubadel on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group Motion for a resolution Citation 11 a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment – having regard to the conclusions of the General Affairs Council of 29/30 April 1997 on the application of conditionality with a view to developing a coherent EU strategy for relations with the countries in the region, Or. en Amendment 9 Viola Von Cramon-Taubadel on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group Motion for a resolution Citation 11 b (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment – having regard to the Berlin Process, launched on 28 August 2014, in particular the declaration of the Western Balkans Foreign Ministers on regional cooperation and bilateral disputes of 27 August 2015 and the establishment of the Regional Youth Cooperation Office (RYCO), Or. en Amendment 10 Viola Von Cramon-Taubadel on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group Motion for a resolution Citation 11 c (new) PE648.421v01-00 6/158 AM\1200111EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment – having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 9 July 2015 on the Srebrenica Commemoration (2015/2747(RSP)), Or. en Amendment 11 Viola Von Cramon-Taubadel on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group Motion for a resolution Citation 11 d (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment – having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 2 April 2009 on European conscience and totalitarianism, Or. en Amendment 12 Tanja Fajon, Andreas Schieder, Robert Hajšel, Juozas Olekas, Nikos Androulakis Motion for a resolution Citation 12 Motion for a resolution Amendment – having regard to the Berlin Process, – having regard to the Berlin Process, launched on 28 August 2014, launched on 28 August 2014, in particular the declaration of the Western Balkans Foreign Ministers on regional cooperation and bilateral disputes of 27 August 2015, and the establishment of the Regional Youth Cooperation Office (RYCO), Or. en AM\1200111EN.docx 7/158 PE648.421v01-00 EN Amendment 13 Anna Fotyga Motion for a resolution Citation 12 Motion for a resolution Amendment – having regard to the Berlin Process, – having regard to the Berlin Process, launched on 28 August 2014, launched on 28 August 2014, with further summits taking place in Vienna (2015),Paris (2016), Trieste (2017), London (2018) and Poznan (2019); Or. en Amendment 14 Tanja Fajon, Andreas Schieder, Robert Hajšel, Juozas Olekas, Nikos Androulakis Motion for a resolution Citation 12 a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment – having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 9 July 2015 on the Srebrenica Commemoration1a, __________________ 1a Text adopted, P8_TA(2015)0276. Or. en Amendment 15 Anna Fotyga Motion for a resolution Citation 14 a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment – having regard to Joint Statement of 13 EU MS of 11th June 2019 on the EU commitment to the Western Balkans’ European integration PE648.421v01-00 8/158 AM\1200111EN.docx EN Or. en Amendment 16 Tonino Picula Motion for a resolution Citation 17 a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment – having regard European Committee of the Regions opinion on the Enlargement package 2019, adopted on 13 February 2020, Or. en Amendment 17 Sunčana Glavak Motion for a resolution Citation 17 a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment – having regard to the informal meeting of 16 February 2020, which brought together the leaders of the Western Balkan countries, the President of the European Council, the President of the European Commission, the High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the Prime Minister of the Republic of Croatia presiding the Council of the European Union, Or. en Amendment 18 Thierry Mariani, Nicolas Bay, Jérôme Rivière Motion for a resolution Recital A AM\1200111EN.docx 9/158 PE648.421v01-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment A. whereas enlargement has been one deleted of the EU’s most successful policies and the most effective foreign policy instrument contributing to extending the area of democracy, peace and prosperity across Europe; Or. fr Amendment 19 Marco Zanni Motion for a resolution Recital A Motion for a resolution Amendment A. whereas enlargement has been one A. whereas, since EU foreign policy is of the EU’s most successful policies and limited and fragmented by its very nature, the most effective foreign policy as there is no ‘European interest’ in this instrument contributing to extending the field, enlargement has been used area of democracy, peace and prosperity indiscriminately in the recent past without across Europe; any sustainability criterion, but as an instrument to wield influence and to engage in a geopolitical struggle with non-EU powers; Or. it Amendment 20 Bernhard Zimniok Motion for a resolution Recital A Motion for a resolution Amendment A. whereas enlargement has been one A. whereas enlargement was and is of the EU’s most successful policies and one of the EU’s more controversial the most effective foreign policy policies and a rather ineffective policy instrument contributing to extending the instrument in regard to extending the area area of democracy, peace and prosperity of democracy, peace and prosperity across PE648.421v01-00 10/158 AM\1200111EN.docx EN across Europe; Europe; Or. en Amendment 21 Nathalie Loiseau, Bernard Guetta, Malik Azmani, Christophe Grudler Motion for a resolution Recital A Motion for a resolution Amendment A.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Balkans in 2020: the Year of Action and Decisions
    WESTERN BALKANS IN 2020: THE YEAR OF ACTION AND DECISIONS Friday, 20 March 2020 10:00 - 15:00 , National Palace of Culture (Hall 8), Sofia, Bulgaria ABOUT THE EVENT 2020 will be pivotal for the enlargement and the engagement with the Western Balkans countries and their perspective within the European Union. European prosperity and security is closely linked to the integration process and the advancement of peace, democracy, respect for human rights and rule of law in the Western Balkans region and their future in a strong and reformed EU. The Western Balkans, racked by war and tragedies throughout the 1990s, has recently seen a surge of significant political, social and economic progress. Yet the need for reforms and transformation is still crucial. We should not forget the fact that after a long stretch of ethnic instability, the region needs an accelerated pace of reforms to help countries moving towards the EU. The new methodology proposed by the EU commission should reassess and inject new dynamism into the enlargement process and provide a new impetus for the transformation of accession countries. EVENT SCHEDULE Friday, 20 March 2020 09:30 Arrival of participants and registration 10:00 - 10:30 Opening remarks: Ilhan Kyuchyuk MEP, Vice President of ALDE Party Jurgen Martens MP, President of European Liberal Forum Mustafa Karadayi MP, Chairman of MRF 10:30 - 12:00 Getting it Right: Towards a positive decision with a renewed accession process? Chaired by Ilhan Kyuchyuk MEP, Vice President of ALDE Party H.E. Nikola Dimitrov, Minister of Foreign Affairs of North Macedonia H.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Mr Josep Borrell Fontelles HR / VP of the European Commission [email protected] [email protected]
    Mr Josep Borrell Fontelles HR / VP of the European Commission [email protected] [email protected] Brussels, 13 May 2020 Dear High Representative and Vice-President Borrell, Censorship of the joint Op-Ed marking the 45th anniversary of EU–China relations on May 6 in the China Daily With this letter we would like to express our concerns about the way in which the EEAS is engaging with its Chinese counterparts and dealing with diplomatic pressure from Chinese official authorities. During our last exchange of views in the AFET Committee on April 30, you firmly reassured the Members of the Parliament that the EU would never bow to pressure coming from Chinese channels to censor our publications. Regrettably, we must however conclude that one week later the EEAS did exactly do that by watering down a joint Op-Ed marking the 45th anniversary of EU–China relations. After pressure from Chinese authorities, the Op-Ed was published on the 6th of May in the China Daily without the reference to the origins of the coronavirus. You will agree with us, that it is most unfortunate that this happened just few days following the World Press Freedom Day on the 3rd of May. The EEAS press release on May 8 attempts to justify the decision to proceed with the censored publication on the ground of the necessity to reach out to the wider Chinese public by passing key messages on a number of priority areas. We certainly recognise the strategical importance of engaging with China and its people.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Members of the European Parliament, 2014–2019
    List of members of the European Parliament, 2014–2019 Below is a list of Members of the European Parliament serving in the eighth term (2014–2019). It is sorted by an English perception of surname treating all variations of de/di/do, van/von, Ó/Ní, and so forth as part of the collation key, even if this is not the normal practice in a member's own country. During the 2014–19 term, there are 751 members of parliament divided among the 28 member states. Contents List of members Austria Belgium Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Results of the election: Finland GUE/NGL G-EFA EPP EFDD France S&D ALDE ECR NI Germany Greece Hungary Ireland Italy Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Poland Portugal Romania Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden United Kingdom Members of the European Parliament who are also citizen of a non-EU country Notes See also List of members Austria On the Austrian People's Party list: (EPP Group) On the Freedom Party list: (Non-inscrits, since 15 June 2015 ENF) 1. Othmar Karas 2. Elisabeth Köstinger – until 8 November 1. Harald Vilimsky 2017[1] 2. Franz Obermayr Lukas Mandl – since 30 November 2017 3. Georg Mayer 3. Paul Rübig 4. Barbara Kappel 4. Claudia Schmidt On The Greens – The Green Alternative list: (Greens- 5. Heinz K. Becker EFA) On the Social Democratic Party of Austria list: (S&D) 1. Ulrike Lunacek – until 8 November 2017[3] 1. Eugen Freund Thomas Waitz – since 10 November 2017 2. Evelyn Regner 2. Michel Reimon 3. Jörg Leichtfried – until 23 June 2015[2] 3.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Motion for a Resolution
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Plenary sitting B9-0357/2021 8.6.2021 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION with request for inclusion in the agenda for a debate on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law pursuant to Rule 144 of the Rules of Procedure on the situation in Sri Lanka, in particular the arrests under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (2021/2748(RSP)) Svenja Hahn, Petras Auštrevičius, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Dita Charanzová, Olivier Chastel, Vlad Gheorghe, Klemen Grošelj, Bernard Guetta, Karin Karlsbro, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Karen Melchior, Javier Nart, Frédérique Ries, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Ramona Strugariu, Dragoş Tudorache, Hilde Vautmans on behalf of the Renew Group RE\P9_B(2021)0357_EN.docx PE694.467v01-00 EN United in diversityEN B9-0357/2021 European Parliament resolution on the situation in Sri Lanka, in particular the arrests under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (2021/2748(RSP)) The European Parliament, having regard to Regulation No. 01 of 2021 published on the 12th of March 2021 under Sri Lanka’s Prevention of Terrorism Act; having regard to Sri Lanka’s Government regulation No. 2 of 2021 under Prevention of Terrorism Act, published on the 13th of April 2021 banning eleven organizations on national security grounds; having regard to the Report of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights of the 27th of January 2021 “Promotion reconciliation, accountability and human rights in Sri Lanka”1; having regard to the restoration of Sri Lanka’s enhanced GSP+ status on 19 May 2017 which provides additional
    [Show full text]
  • 1 03 Sept. 2014 How the Sakharov Prize 2014 Is Awarded Background Briefing in the Next 10 Days, the Nominations of the Sakharov
    1 03 Sept. 2014 How the Sakharov Prize 2014 is awarded Background briefing In the next 10 days, the nominations of the Sakharov Prize for Human Rights will be decided by the European Parliament. The prize is awarded to “honour exceptional individuals who combat intolerance, fanaticism and oppression.”1 Previous winners include Nelson Mandela, Reporters without Borders and Anatoli Marchenko. If you believe that Azerbaijani human rights defenders – who are now in jail following years of work on behalf of the rights of others, and most recently on a list of political prisoners in Azerbaijan (on which they are now included) – then let the MEPs who vote on this know. Nominations for the Sakharov Prize can be made by: Political groups in the European Parliament. Or At least 40 MEPs. The deadline for nominations is Thursday 18 September at 12:00 in Strasbourg. NOTE: In order to decide on a nominee from their group some political groups have internal deadlines in the course of the next week. The next days are crucial. We focus here on four important political groups which might to support this nomination: The EPP Social Democrats Liberals Greens 1Source: The European Union website: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/aboutparliament/en/00f3dd2249/Sakharov-Prize-for-Freedom-of-Thought.html 2 Once the nominations are been made, the Foreign Affairs and Development committees vote on a shortlist of three finalists. This happens on either Monday 6th or Tuesday 7th October 2014. The members list for the foreign affairs committee can be found here: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/afet/members.html, while the development committee is here: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/deve/members.html#menuzone.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Minutes
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ENVI_PV(2020)0928_1 MINUTES Meeting of 28 September 2020, 13.45-15.45 BRUSSELS The meeting opened at 13.55 on Monday, 28 September 2020, with Pascal Canfin (Chair) presiding. 1. Adoption of agenda ENVI_OJ(2020)0928_1 The agenda was adopted in the form shown in these minutes. 2. Chair's announcements The Chair made the following announcements: Interpretation status: due to scarcity of resources and technical restrictions in the meeting room and based on the linguistic profile of ENVI Members, interpretation was available in 6 languages: French, German, Italian, English, Spanish and Polish. Electronic meeting file/Webstreaming: The Chair announced that as usual, the meeting file was available electronically via the e-meeting application and that the meeting would be web streamed. Remote participation of ENVI Members: The Chair announced that the meeting would be held in a remote participation format. At 15.45, the remote voting session opened. Members taking part in the vote had received a ballot paper- voting list that needed to be signed and sent back with the voting indications PV\1217944EN.docx PE660.271v01-00 EN United in diversityEN before 17.45. The results of the votes on the amendments would be announced in writing. Information on the outcome on the budget amendments : The Chair informed that during the voting session on 21 September 2020, ENVI had voted on the amendments to the "General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2021 - all sections". The list of the adopted amendments could be found on the website.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Results
    Briefing June 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Results Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 7 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 3 seats 2 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Heinz Christian Strache 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide 6. Alexander Bernhuber 7. Barbara Thaler NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 1. Maria Arena* Socialist Party (PS) Christian Social Party 3. Johan Van Overtveldt 2. Marc Tarabella* (S&D) 2 seats (CSP) (EPP) 1 seat New Flemish Alliance (N-VA) 1. Olivier Chastel (Greens/EFA) Reformist 2. Frédérique Ries* 4 seats Movement (MR) (ALDE) 2 seats 1. Philippe Lamberts* 2. Saskia Bricmont 1. Guy Verhofstadt* Ecolo (Greens/EFA) 2. Hilde Vautmans* 2 seats Open Flemish Liberals and Democrats (Open 1. Benoît Lutgen Humanist VLD) (ALDE) 2 seats democratic centre (cdH) (EPP) 1 seat 1. Kris Peeters Workers’ Party of 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ramona-Victoria Strugariu European Parliament, WIB 05M047 1047, Brussels Brussels, 30Th of April 2020
    Ramona-Victoria Strugariu European Parliament, WIB 05M047 1047, Brussels Brussels, 30th of April 2020 Dear Commissioner Breton, Dear Commissioner Gabriel, The Corona virus crisis is not only a medical, logistical and economic challenge, it is also a cultural challenge. As it was also underlined in the resolution of the European Parliament adopted on the 17th of April 2020 - EU coordinated action to combat the COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences, the cultural and creative sectors in the Member States have been hit especially hard due to the closure of cinemas, theatres and music venues and the sudden stop of ticket sales. The current crisis is particularly critical for cultural and creative sectors due to the sudden and massive loss of revenue opportunities. In the aforementioned resolution, the European Parliament has also pointed out that these sectors have high numbers of freelance and self- employed workers, many of whom were struggling well before the outbreak and that the effects are particularly dire for creative professionals, whose income streams have been unexpectedly reduced to zero and who now have little or no support from the social system. The current situation creates therefore a structural threat to the survival of many actors involved in cultural and creative production. And yet cultural actors have found creative ways to offer hope amid the COVID-19 crisis and showed their solidarity in very concrete ways. Many cultural institutions and actors have provided online and free content in recent weeks, aware of the fact that the availability of cultural contents contributes to the mental health and the general well-being of our populations, especially in times of crisis when citizens are confronted with the reality of disease and lockdowns.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Motion for a Resolution
    European Parliament 2014-2019 Plenary sitting B8-0058/2016 14.1.2016 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION to wind up the debate on the statement by the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy pursuant to Rule 123(2) of the Rules of Procedure on the implementation of the mutual assistance clause, Article 42(7) of the Treaty on European Union (2015/3034(RSP)) Urmas Paet, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Louis Michel, Jozo Radoš, Marietje Schaake, Pavel Telička, Johannes Cornelis van Baalen, Hilde Vautmans, Guy Verhofstadt, Ivo Vajgl on behalf of the ALDE Group RE\1083533EN.doc PE575.960v01-00 EN United in diversity EN B8-0058/2016 European Parliament resolution on the implementation of the mutual assistance clause, Article 42(7) of the Treaty on European Union (2015/3034(RSP)) The European Parliament, – having regard to the 2004 Madrid terrorist attacks, the 2005 London terrorist attacks, the 2014 Brussels terrorist attacks and the multiple 2015 Paris terrorist attacks, – having regard to the speech made by the President of the French Republic before a joint session of the French Parliament on 16 November 2015, – having regard to Title V of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and its Article 42(7), – having regard to Article 222 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), – having regard to Article 2(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), – having regard to the European Security Strategy adopted by the European Council on 12 December 2003, and to the report
    [Show full text]
  • Protokół Posiedzenia W Dniu 10 Lutego 2015 R. (2016/C 102/02)
    17.3.2016 PL Dziennik Urzędo wy U nii Europejskiej C 102/13 Wtorek, 10 lutego 2015 r. PROTOKÓŁ POSIEDZENIA W DNIU 10 LUTEGO 2015 R. (2016/C 102/02) Spis treści Strona 1. Otwarcie posiedzenia . 14 2. Debata nad przypadkami łamania praw człowieka, zasad demokracji i państwa prawa (ogłoszenie 14 o złożonych projektach rezolucji) . 3. Inicjatywy w ramach prowadzonej w Międzynarodowej Organizacji Pracy debaty dotyczącej prawa do strajku 16 (debata) . 4. Europejska Inicjatywa na rzecz Młodzieży (zmiana rozporządzenia w sprawie Europejskiego Funduszu 16 Społecznego) (debata) . 5. Promowanie partycypacji finansowej pracowników (debata) . 17 6. Zatwierdzenie protokołu poprzedniego posiedzenia . 18 7. Transgraniczna wymiana informacji dotyczących przestępstw lub wykroczeń związanych z bezpieczeństwem 18 ruchu drogowego ***I (debata) . 8. Sytuacja w Republice Demokratycznej Konga (debata) . 18 9. Niedobór finansowania Organizacji Narodów Zjednoczonych ds. Pomocy Uchodźcom Palestyńskim 19 (UNRWA) (debata) . 10. Sprostowanie (art. 231 Regulaminu) . 19 11. Sytuacja na Ukrainie (debata) . 19 12. Konferencja przeglądowa stron układu o nierozprzestrzenianiu broni jądrowej w 2015 r. (debata) . 20 13. Prace Wspólnego Zgromadzenia Parlamentarnego AKP-UE (debata) . 21 14. Skład Parlamentu . 21 15. Skład delegacji międzyparlamentarnych . 21 16. Zero tolerancji dla okaleczania kobiecych narządów płciowych (debata) . 22 17. Przystąpienie Gabonu do konwencji haskiej z 1980 r. dotyczącej cywilnych aspektów uprowadzenia dziecka za granicę * — Przystąpienie Andory do konwencji haskiej z 1980 r. dotyczącej cywilnych aspektów upro- wadzenia dziecka za granicę * — Przystąpienie Republiki Seszeli do konwencji haskiej z 1980 r. dotyczącej cywilnych aspektów uprowadzenia dziecka za granicę * — Przystąpienie Rosji do konwencji haskiej z 1980 r. dotyczącej cywilnych aspektów uprowadzenia dziecka za granicę * — Przystąpienie Albanii do konwencji haskiej z 1980 r.
    [Show full text]
  • Care Farming State-Of-The-Art National Report
    2017-1-PL01-KA202-038380 CARE-T-FARMS Care Activities Raising Employment and Training on Farm Adaptation to Responsible and Mental-health Services Care Farming State-of-the-Art European Report https://europa.eu/european-union/about-e 1 Developed by the European Landowners’ Organization in Brussels, Belgium (Marie-Alice Budniok, Maeve Howe, and Servane Morand) February 2018 page 1 of 16 Introduction 1. Theoretical background of care farming at European level. Care farming, also known as “green care”, “social farming”, "farming for health", and "green therapies", has taken on various forms and is organised in different ways in different European countries. There is great variety in the approaches to social farming across Europe, as well as in how it is connected to other sectors and the funding mechanisms that are used. Care farming has taken on many different forms across Europe, broadly based around three different discourses; multifunctional agriculture, public health, and social inclusion. One could say that care farming is most established in the Netherlands, Belgium, and Italy. Most research in the Netherlands focuses on care farming as part of the agricultural sector and as a new source of farm income. Great importance is also placed on interaction between participants and the farmers and their families. Care farming took off commercially in the Netherlands in the 1990s. It tends to operate on a service-based model. Engaging in care farming activities are seen as a type of social or health service and these activities are paid for directly or indirectly through health insurance. Similarities with the Dutch experience of social farming can be observed in Flanders (Belgium) and Slovenia.
    [Show full text]