John C. Danforth Center on Religion and Politics Annual Report 2012-2013 Mission the Center Serves As an Ideologically Neutral John C

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

John C. Danforth Center on Religion and Politics Annual Report 2012-2013 Mission the Center Serves As an Ideologically Neutral John C John C. Danforth Center on Religion and Politics Annual Report 2012-2013 Mission The Center serves as an ideologically neutral John C. Danforth Center venue for fostering rigorous scholarship and informing on Religion and Politics broad academic and public communities about the Annual Report 2012-2013 intersections of religion and U.S. politics. Contents Founding 2 Letter from the Chancellor 4 Letter from the Center Director 5 Leading 6 People 8 Faculty Director Faculty Center Founders Postdoctoral Fellow Staff National Advisory Board 16 Washington University Executive Committee 18 Engaging 20 Public Events 22 Academics 24 Courses Religion and Politics Minor Colloquium Students 28 Online Journal 30 Supporters 32 Looking Ahead 34 New Appointments 36 Faculty Associate Director Graduate Students Coming Events 40 B John C. Danforth Center on Religion and Politics Founding The John C. Danforth Center on Religion and Politics owes its existence to the tremendous generosity of the Danforth Foundation, founded in 1927 by Mr. and Mrs. William H. Danforth. The Foundation’s commitment to funding St. Louis-based initiatives is well known, and in 2009 it announced a major gift to Washington University to establish the Center. John C. Danforth, former Senator from Missouri and U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, was particularly engaged in the Center’s founding and remains a member of its National Advisory Board. This gift reflects Senator Danforth’s specific interest in religion and politics, as set out in his 2006 book, Faith and Politics: How the “Moral Values” Debate Divides America and How to Move Forward Together (Viking). Letter from the Chancellor Letter from the Center Director profound issues on which American citizens The John C. Danforth Center has now completed sometimes disagree. its third full year of operations, and what a marvelous year it has been! Over the past year, the Center has certainly accomplished its mission. It has engaged the Two new faculty members, Mark Jordan and public by hosting more than 1,300 community Darren Dochuk, joined us in the summer of 2012, members at a varied program of lectures by along with our first postdoctoral research fellow, visiting professors and nationally recognized Anne Blankenship. In the course of the year, personalities. The online journal Religion and we hired another stellar faculty member, Laurie Politics celebrated its first year by garnering Maffly-Kipp, and another postdoctoral fellow, notable awards and more than one million page Lerone Martin, along with the Center’s new views. It has continued to recruit new faculty and Associate Director, Rachel M. Lindsey. staff members, increased the number of course Religion and Politics—two subjects that can elicit offerings from 3 to 7, and now offers a minor in All the while we were building a brand new un- founding gift from the Danforth Foundation and emotion and initiate debate across all levels of Religion and Politics for undergraduates. This past dergraduate curriculum in religion and politics; the extraordinary graciousness of Senator John C. our society, and two subjects that are historically year the Center also launched the Colloquium establishing a dissertation fellowship program Danforth, other gifts have increased our endow- bound together in American democracy. In the on American Religion, Politics, and Culture. This for visiting Ph.D. students; our online journal ment and enabled us to do still more to increase three years of its existence, the John C. Danforth research-oriented, community-building workshop reached more readers than ever before; and our the resources and possibilities of this innovative Center on Religion and Politics continues to featured 16 scholars from 12 different universities diverse public programming drew thousands Center. To those who have given generously and fulfill its mission of providing an ideologically and multiple disciplines who came together to to the Washington University campus and our sacrificially to the Center, know that we will use neutral place where dialogue on these subjects explore topical issues at the core of the Center: online streaming services. these gifts wisely and well. can be freely expressed, with respect for different church/state relations, religion and secularism, the points of view and belief systems, and with the role of religion in national elections, and the rise This year, the Center hosted seven public lectures, This year, we have been especially humbled by the focus always on providing excellent scholarship of the Religious Right, to name just a few. including two accomplished figures from across generosity of Dr. William Neaves, who established and encouraging relevant, thought-provoking the political spectrum. George F. Will’s December a professorship in the Center to honor his beloved discussion for the community. It is clear that the Center is contributing greatly 2012 keynote address earned us much praise and and highly accomplished wife. In early 2013, Mark to the quality and impact of our University, and also some criticism. In February, we co-sponsored D. Jordan assumed the Reverend Priscilla Wood The Center seeks to deepen the academic and it is equally apparent that its endeavors are of a public lecture by Sandra Fluke, whose admirers Neaves Distinguished Professorship (page 33). public understanding of religion and politics use, interest, and value beyond the Washington and critics were no less vocal. Research universi- in America. Its ongoing commitment is to University community. We are grateful to Senator ties, like our Center itself, have always stood for I invite you to visit us online or in person, to see consider multiple and sometimes conflicting Danforth, a true visionary, whose strong belief the airing of truly diverse viewpoints; and in what we’re doing, and to share your ideas about perspectives and to contribute rigorous, unbiased that we can move forward together despite having these polarized times, engaging rigorously with how we may do it better. We will never stop trying standards and scholarship to these discussions. divergent opinions on matters of politics and perspectives that challenge one’s own has never to improve. Thank you again for your critical At the launch of the Center, former Senator religion is an aspiration that continues to guide us. seemed more urgent. feedback and support. and Ambassador to the United Nations John C. Danforth stated, “The more light that is shed Mark S. Wrighton None of these achievements would be possible R. Marie Griffith on a subject, the healthier we are.” The Center’s Chancellor without the concrete support of our growing Director goal is to shed light by encouraging and sustain- number of benefactors and donors, all of whom ing civil discourse and respectfully addressing we have listed at the end of this report. Since the 4 John C. Danforth Center on Religion and Politics Annual Report 2012-2013 5 Leading Our Commitments: To support and enhance outstanding scholarly research on the historical and contemporary intertwining of religion and politics. To disseminate excellent scholarship to students and the broad public by means of courses, lectures, and conferences. To foster debate and discussion among people who hold widely different views about religion and/ or politics. 6 John C. Danforth Center on Religion and Politics Annual Report 2012-2013 7 Faculty Director Faculty R. Marie Griffith Leigh Eric Schmidt R. Marie Griffith, the John C. Danforth Professor in the Divinity School, serving as well Leigh Eric Schmidt is the Edward C. Mallinckrodt the American Society of Church History. In Distinguished Professor in the Humanities at on the faculty committee for the History of University Professor in the Humanities at addition, Schmidt has served as co-editor with Washington University in St. Louis, is currently American Civilization program in the Faculty of Washington University in St. Louis. He joined the Sally Promey of American Religious Liberalism the director of the John C. Danforth Center Arts and Sciences. John C. Danforth Center on Religion and Politics (Indiana University Press, 2012), co-editor with on Religion and Politics. in 2011. Laurie Maffly-Kipp and Mark Valeri of Practicing Her first major publication was God’s Daughters: Protestants: Histories of the Christian Life in Professor Griffith earned her undergraduate Evangelical Women and the Power of Submission From 2009 to 2011, he was the Charles Warren America (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006), degree at the University of Virginia in Political (University of California Press, 1997), which Professor of the History of Religion in America and co-author with Edwin Scott Gaustad of The and Social Thought in 1989. She completed both examines the practices and perceptions of at Harvard University, and, from 1995 to 2009, Religious History of America (HarperOne, 2002). her M.A. and Ph.D. in the study of religion at contemporary evangelical women. Her next book, he taught at Princeton University where he Schmidt’s latest single- authored book is Heaven’s Harvard University. Upon earning her doctorate Born Again Bodies: Flesh and Spirit in American was the Agate Brown and George L. Collord Bride: The Unprintable Life of Ida C. Craddock, in 1995, she was awarded consecutive fellowships Christianity (University of California Press, 2004), Professor of Religion and served as chair of the American Mystic, Scholar, Sexologist, Martyr, and at both Princeton University and Northwestern explores the history of Christian-influenced Department of Religion. He has held research Madwoman (Basic Books, 2010). University. In 1999, she joined the faculty attitudes and practices related to embodiment in fellowships at Stanford and Princeton and at Princeton where she filled several roles. modern America, culminating in the evangelical also through the National Endowment for the His next book project explores how atheism and From 1999–2003, she was associate director of diet and fitness movement. These books, along Humanities, the American Council of Learned nonbelief have fared historically in American Princeton’s Center for the Study of Religion.
Recommended publications
  • International Programs Whitney R
    Whitney R. Harris World Law Institute Report of Activities | 2013-2016 International Programs Whitney R. Harris World Law Institute Washington University School of Law Report of Activities | 2013-2016 Contents Leadership 1 Dean Nancy Staudt 2 Professor Leila Nadya Sadat 3 International Council 4 MISSION: Faculty Advisory Board 6 Through a combination of education and research, the Whitney R. Harris World Law Institute contributes to the betterment of global Research Activities 8 society. It does this by increasing global knowledge and understand- Overview 10 ing, promoting the rule of law, and addressing problems that require Crimes Against Humanity Initiative 11 international cooperation and international solutions. Other Conferences 14 Selected Lectures 18 The Institute enhances the intellectual vibrancy of the Law School Workshops & Roundtables 22 and the University, provides advice and assistance to other University departments and transnational components of the Law School, and Outreach & Publications 24 fosters collaboration among colleagues at home and abroad who are Overview 26 engaged in international or comparative work. Books & Journals 27 Washington University Global Studies Law Review 28 Blog: Lex lata, lex ferenda 28 Documentary Film 29 Never Again: Forging a Convention for Crimes Against Humanity International Programs & Global Learning Opportunities 30 Overview 32 JD Students 33 LLM & JSD Students 36 International Programs & Student Opportunities 39 Faculty & Staff 42 Overview 44 Faculty 45 Selected Visiting Faculty & Scholars 47 Staff 47 Looking Forward 48 Fall 2016 Events 50 Spring 2017 Events 51 LEADERSHIP Do not go where the path may lead, go “instead where“ there is no path and leave a trail. — Ralph Waldo Emerson Leadership Leila Nadya Sadat Nancy Staudt James Carr Professor of International Dean and Howard & Caroline Cayne Criminal Law and Director, Professor of Law Whitney R.
    [Show full text]
  • Panel Session 1: Wednesday, August 8 10:45Am-12:15Pm
    Panel Session 1: Wednesday, August 8 10:45am-12:15pm “There’s an app for that!” Social Media and Virtual Soteriology Multipurpose Room A Dheepa Sundaram, College of Wooster, USA: “‘Instagram your Durgā pūjā!’ A Social Media Experience of Durgā Pūjā in Bengal” Andrea L Stanton, University of Denver, USA: “App’ing the Hajj: Keeping Count of Tawaf and Finding the Restrooms” Tine Vekemans, Ghent University, Belgium: “From Self-Learning Pathshala to Tirth App: The Expanding World of Jain Religious Apps” Owen Gottlieb, Rochester Institute of Technology, USA: “Minecrafting Bar Mitzvah: A Digital Pathway of Inclusion, Self-Expression, and Justice in Jewish Worship” Chair: Benedikt Kastner, University of Hamburg, Germany ​ ​ Roundtable on Teaching Religion and Journalism in the Age of Trump Multipurpose Room B Robert Jensen, University of Texas-Austin, USA Joyce Smith, Ryerson University, Canada Diane Winston, University of Southern California, USA Moderator: Mia Lövheim, Uppsala University, Sweden Streaming the Word: A Roundtable Discussion on Religion Podcasting Multipurpose Room C John Dehlin, Mormon Stories ​ Vincent Horn, Buddhist Geeks ​ Rev. Anne Dunlap, The Word is Resistance ​ Moderator: D. Ashley Campbell, (w)Holy Media podcast creator and host, and University of Colorado ​ ​ ​ Boulder, USA Pope Francis and the Media The View Laurens de Rooij, University of Cape Town, South Africa: “Papal Narratives: The Discourse of Pope Francis, And His Media Representation” Oren Golan and Michele Martini, University of Haifa, Israel: “The Making of Contemporary Papacy: Instagram Strategies and Manufactured Charisma” Gustavo Guizzardi, University of Padova, Italy: “When the Pope is Image” Carlo Nardella, University of Milano, Italy: “Behind the Representation: Pope and Journalists” Chair: Carlo Nardella, University of Milano, Italy Religion and Media in India Breakout Room A Soumi Banerjee, Lund University, Sweden: “The Emerging Hindutva wave in India: Politics of Hated, Collective Memory Mobilisation and Myth-making” Juli L.
    [Show full text]
  • A N N U a L R E P O R T 2 0
    NATIONAL BLACK MBA ASSOCIATION® INC Staying Current, Creative and Credible! ANNUAL REPORT 2007 3 NBMBAA® Background 4 Messages 6 A Culmination of a 5-Year Strategy 9 National Award Recipients 2003–2007 TABLE OF 11 Education 14 Career CONTENTS 15 Leadership 16 Entrepreneurship & Lifestyle 17 Chapters 19 Independent Auditor’s Report 20 Financials 22 Partners NBMBAA® Management Team 2007 Board of Directors Barbara L. Thomas William W. Wells Jr., Board Chair President & CEO President, W. Wells & Associates Cecil B. Lucy Angela D. Eason, Secretary Vice President, Finance & Legal Affairs/CFO Senior Manager, Deloitte Kim Wilson Dimitrius M. Hutcherson, Sr., Treasurer Vision Vice President, Strategic Program Initiatives Senior Manager, Deloitte Liz Hope Charles A. Bogguess The NBMBAA’s vision is to be an organization which leads in the creation of Director, Administration & Fund Development, Marketing Consultant, Next Age Consulting economic and intellectual wealth for Blacks. Bridgitti Knox Alvin Brown (Immediate Past Chair) CMP Director, Conference, Meetings & Events Senior Advisor, Hillary Clinton Fred Phillips Thomas W. Dortch, Jr. Director, Chapter Relations & Membership Services Chairman and CEO, TWD, Inc. Mission Reniece Wright Audrey D. Hines Director, Human Resources President, Dillard Hines & Associates ® Established in 1970, the National Black MBA Association is dedicated Stephen C. Lewis to developing partnerships that result in the creation of intellectual and Director, Strategic Planning, Manufacturing Executive economic wealth in the black community. In partnership with over 480 of Office, Ford Motor Company the nation’s top business organizations, the association has inroads into a Dr. dt ogilvie wide range of industries as well as the public and private sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Avery Coonley School Magazinewinter 2011 Spring 2019
    The Avery Coonley School MagazineWinter 2011 Spring 2019 One Journey Ends, Another Begins The Avery Coonley School 2018-2019 Board of Trustees Our Philosophy Mission Statement Chair of the Board Amy Louis We believe that the joy and excitement of The Avery Coonley School is an Vice Chair learning must begin early in life. We place independent school whose mission is to Brendan Sheehy a high premium on developing the desire provide a learning environment that is in our students to become critical thinkers Treasurer appropriate both for academically bright and and independent, life-long learners. gifted children who are motivated to learn William Atwood and have demonstrated the potential for the We assist our students in realizing their Assistant Treasurer scholastic achievement necessary to succeed intellectual, emotional, social, creative, and Deborah Clarke in a challenging academic program, in order physical potential by promoting academic that they may become positive, productive, Secretary achievement, character development, and respectful members of society. Shannon Weinberger self-reliance, self-confidence, independent thought, and personal fitness. Assistant Secretary Jennifer Reenan We recognize and are sensitive to the Trustees unique needs of gifted children. Within Mary Ellen Bull ‘79 a traditional structure, we provide Nancy Doris ‘91 acceleration and enrichment, and foster Brian Gilmartin a supportive atmosphere that provides Sue Gould opportunities for creativity, problem- solving, and risk-taking. Raj Goyal Jo h n P. G r u b e We believe that diversity is the Jacqueline Gupta foundation for a strong, competent, and John Harrast compassionate community. Therefore, Kevin Peterson ‘69 we value racial, religious, economic, and Imran Qureshi cultural diversity in our student body, Catherine Slark faculty, and staff.
    [Show full text]
  • 15233 SSRC NDSP Book.Rp2.Indd
    WHY PRAYER? February 6th & 7th, 2015 Italian Academy, Columbia University New York, New York NDSP New Directions in the Study of Prayer (NDSP) is a project developed by the Social Science Research Council’s program on Religion and the Public Sphere. Launched in 2011 under the leadership of former program director Jonathan VanAntwerpen and a multidisciplinary advisory committee, NDSP provided funding and fellowship opportunities to twenty- eight scholars and journalists engaged in innovative research and reporting on the social, cultural, historical, psychological, and cognitive dimensions of the practice of prayer. Grants were made possible by the John Templeton Foundation. Now, as the project draws to a close, it is a pleasure to bring grantees and other interlocuters together for Why Prayer? A Conference on New Directions in the Study of Prayer. With topics ranging from examinations of religious technologies and politics to insights on language, embodiment, and psychology, this two-day gathering offers an invaluable opportunity to look back on the excellent work done as part of the NDSP project and to look ahead to new avenues of exploration in the study of prayer and its many manifestations. — Candace E. West PROGRAM OFFICER, RELIGION AND THE PUBLIC SPHERE SSRC The Social Science Research Council (SSRC) is an independent, international, nonprofit organization founded in 1923. It fosters innovative research, nurtures new generations of social scientists, deepens how inquiry is practiced within and across disciplines, and mobilizes necessary knowledge on important public issues. The SSRC is guided by the belief that justice, prosperity, and democracy all require better understanding of complex social, cultural, economic, and political processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    2019-2020 ANNUAL REPORT WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST. LOUIS Prof. Griffith, Center Director, teaches a small seminar class. ABOUT THE COVER: Sen. Jack Danforth and Prof. Amy Chua discuss her recent book in a public conversation hosted in Washington University’s Graham Chapel. MISSION The Center serves as an open venue for fostering rigorous scholarship and informing broad academic and public communities about the intersections of religion and U.S. politics. PG 2 PG 4 PG 6 PG 12 PG 26 PG 45 AT A GLANCE LETTERS RESEARCH AND PUBLIC PEOPLE LOOKING TEACHING ENGAGEMENT FORWARD 1 John C. Danforth Center on Religion and Politics 2019-2020 Annual Report 2019-2020 AT A GLANCE The John C. Danforth Center on Religion and Politics is a dynamic academic center with many different activities and community interactions happening each day. While we can’t tell a full story with numbers, a snapshot can give a sense of this year’s accomplishments. 14 48 UNDERGRADUATE ARTICLES PUBLISHED COURSES in Religion & Politics OFFERED IN 2019-2020 IN 2019-2020 12 2000+ 11 PUBLIC EVENTS ATTENDEES AT MEETINGS OF THE SUPPORTED BY PUBLIC EVENTS COLLOQUIUM THE CENTER IN 2019-2020 ON AMERICAN RELIGION, POLITICS, AND CULTURE 34 8 STUDENTS WITH FACULTY A DECLARED MINOR MEMBERS IN RELIGION AND POLITICS 2 Umrath Hall is home to the John C. Danforth Center on Religion and Politics. 3 LETTER FROM THE CHANCELLOR What a year it has been! In fact, I’d venture to say this past academic year was filled with some of the most pressing political and ethical challenges of our time, one of the most significant being our community and global response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • The Center for Religion and Media 726 Broadway, Suite 554 New York, New York 10003
    new york university The Center for Religion and Media 726 Broadway, Suite 554 New York, New York 10003 faculty of arts and science tisch school of the arts new york university the center for religion and media newsletter 2008 www.nyu.edu/fas/center/religionandmedia Mission Statement The Center for Religion and Media seeks to develop interdisciplinary, cross-cultural knowledge of how religious ideas and practices are shaped and spread through a variety of media. The Center, funded by The Pew Charitable Trusts, is a collaborative project of the Religious Studies Program; the Center for Media, Culture and History; and the Department of Journalism, providing a space for scholarly endeavor, a stage for public educational events, and an electronic interface with media specialists and the public through its innovative web magazine, The Revealer: A Daily Review of Religion and the Press (www.therevealer.org). Staff Advisory Board Purnima Mankekar Faye Ginsburg Lila Abu-Lughod Stanford University Co-Director Columbia University Birgit Meyer Angela Zito Arjun Appadurai Free University, Amsterdam Co-Director New School University Daniel Miller Barbara Abrash Orlando Bagwell University College, London Director of Public Programs Ford Foundation Michael Renov Nam June Paik, TV Buddha, 1974, Laura Terruso Elizabeth Castelli University of Southern California collection of Stedelijk Museum, Amsterdam Program Coordinator Barnard College of Patricia Spyer Jeff Sharlet Columbia University Leiden University Editor, The Revealer Stewart M. Hoover Jeremy Stolow
    [Show full text]
  • Why Prayer? a Conference on New Directions in the Study of Prayer New York, NY | February 6 & 7, 2015 Italian Academy, Columbia University
    Why Prayer? A Conference on New Directions in the Study of Prayer New York, NY | February 6 & 7, 2015 Italian Academy, Columbia University Friday, February 6 9:30 a.m. – 9:45 a.m. Welcome Plenary - Teatro Candace West, SSRC Courtney Bender, NDSP Advisory Committee Chair 9:45 a.m. – 11:15 a.m. Prayer Machines – Library The Point of Contact: Radio Prayers and the Apparatus of Belief Anderson Blanton, Max Planck Institute, Göttingen Pray Pray Revolution: The Re-Invention of Islamic Rites by Engineers Leor Halevi, Vanderbilt University A Prayer Machine by Any Other Name John Modern, Franklin and Marshall College Discussant: Fabio Rambelli, UC Santa Barbara Moderator: Charles Hirschkind, UC Berkeley Prayer and Embodiment – Salone Prayer as an Embodied Cognitive Activity Mark Aveyard, American University of Sharjah Prayer and the Extraordinary Action of Beings Without Bodies Tom Csordas, UC San Diego Existential Chabad: Contemplative Prayer and Everyday Transcendence Don Seeman, Emory University Discussant: Kevin Ladd, Indiana University South Bend Moderator: Courtney Bender 11:15 a.m. – 11:30 a.m. Break 11:30 a.m. – 1:15 p.m. Covering Prayer- Teatro A Roundtable Moderated By: Sam Freedman, Columbia University and The New York Times Peter Manseau, Freelance Journalist Emma-Kate Symons, Freelance Journalist Christine Wicker, Freelance Journalist Introduction: Diane Winston, University of Southern California Prayer and the Political I - Salone An Ethnography of Religious Labor in an Indian Muslim Community Parvis Ghassem-Fachandi, Rutgers University The Politics of Prayer Books: Delegated Intercession, Names, and Community Boundaries in the Russian Orthodox Church Sonja Luehrmann, Simon Fraser University Prayers as Life Affirming Practices: Dalit Christianity in Kerala Sanal Mohan, Mahatma Gandhi University Prayers of Purification Among Muslim Women in France Fareen Parvez, University of Massachusetts, Amherst Discussant: Matthew Engelke, London School of Economics Moderator: Peter van der Veer, Max Planck Institute, Göttingen 1:15 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridging the Gap
    UPDATE Bridging the Gap Religion and the News Media by John Dart and Jimmy Allen Bridging the Gap: Religion and the News Media by John Dart and Jimmy Allen ©2000 First Amendment Center 1207 18th Avenue South Nashville, TN 37212 (615) 321-9588 www.freedomforum.org Editor: Natilee Duning Designer: Sonya Watson Proofreader: Eugenia Harris Publication No. 93-F04: Rev. 3/00 To order additional copies of this report, call 1-800-830-3733. Contents I. U PDATE 2000 Gap narrows as religion coverage expands . .i II. B RIDGING THE G AP: RELIGION AND THE N EWS M EDIA 1993 Introduction by John Seigenthaler . .1 Chapter One Divided by the seas of suspicion: An overview . .5 Chapter Two The climate of contemporary opinion . .9 Chapter Three Secular newsrooms, sacred message . .13 Chapter Four How believers view the news . .29 Chapter Five Testing the troubled waters: A survey . .43 Chapter Six Previous research and skewed perceptions . .53 Chapter Seven Working the religion beat . .67 Chapter Eight Final words on closing the gap: Recommendations . .75 A PPENDIX Coverage polarizes news media, clergy . .85 B IBLIOGRAPHY . .93 A CKNOWLEDGMENTS . .99 A BOUT THE A UTHORS . .101 I NDEX . .103 UPDATE 2000 Gap narrows as religion coverage expands B Y J OHN D ART When this study was first published in 1993, religious leaders were expressing dissatisfaction with news coverage of religion, and the complaints were grabbing the attention of media professionals like never before. From churches to temples, conservatives and liberals alike spoke of shoddy, simplistic reporting and anti-religious bias. They complained of the widespread underplaying — even downright avoidance — of religious influences in news events.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Religious Literacy?
    Understanding Religious Literacy Content Creators and Providers in Education, Journalism and New Media A Report for the Arthur Vining Davis Foundations August 2021 Background The Arthur Vining Davis Foundations (AVDF) commissioned the Aspen Institute Inclusive America Project (IAP) to conduct a review of content providers and creators of religious literacy materials in the categories of new media, education, and journalism. IAP partnered with the USC Center for Religion and Civic Culture (CRCC) to undertake the review, focusing on those three categories. This collaborative effort has two aims: to distill findings and recommendations that might inform an approach to building on content creators’ current work; and to offer resources to funders as they explore opportunities to participate in this work. For all inquiries related to the Inclusive America Project, please contact: [email protected]. Copyright © 2021 by The Aspen Institute The Aspen Institute 2300 N Street, NW Suite 700 Washington, DC 20037 Published in the United States of America in 2021 by The Aspen Institute All rights reserved Overview This report seeks to help practitioners, content creators, academics, and funders understand the landscape of religious literacy content being developed in education, new media, and journalism. Our hope is to provide these individuals with a broader perspective on what has been created so that they can situate themselves within this Constructing the landscape, find a community of fellow travelers with whom they 1 category of what is can foster new collaborations, and learn and grow their own work. and is not religion In doing so, they may contribute to a larger collective effort.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Report
    The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is a non-profit grassroots organization dedicated to presenting an Islamic perspective on issues of importance to the American public. CAIR is the largest American Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization in the United States, serving the interests of over seven million American Muslims. The vision of CAIR is to be a leading advocate for social justice and mutual understanding. CAIR's mission is to enhance a general understanding of Islam, encourage dialogue, protect civil liberties, empower American Muslims and build coalitions that promote justice and mutual understanding. CAIR would like to acknowledge Mrs. Khadija Athman, Ms. Sanaa Ansari, Mr. Noman Bajwa and CAIR’s Civil Rights Department in the compilation of the 2005 report. We would also like to acknowledge Ms. Taiyyaba Qureshi and Mr. Mohamed Sabur for their research during their 2004 summer internship at CAIR. Questions about this report can be directed to: Arsalan T. Iftikhar National Legal Director Council on American-Islamic Relations 453 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington DC 20003 Tel: 202/488-8787 Fax: 202/488-0833 Email: [email protected] To obtain copies of this report, please contact [email protected] FAIR USE NOTICE: This report may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of political, human rights, democracy and social justice issues, and so on. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads/Pdf/Public Information/NYPD Report-Radicalization in the West.Pdf (Accessed on 2 April 2015)
    Societies 2015, 5, 354–383; doi:10.3390/soc5020354 OPEN ACCESS societies ISSN 2075-4698 www.mdpi.com/journal/societies Article “Jihad Cool/Jihad Chic”: The Roles of the Internet and Imagined Relations in the Self-Radicalization of Colleen LaRose (Jihad Jane) Caroline Joan S. Picart Tim Bower Rodriguez, P.A., 601 N. Ashley Drive, Suite 310, Tampa, FL 33602, USA; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-850-459-0066 Academic Editor: Jonathan Frauley Received: 25 January 2015 / Accepted: 10 April 2015 / Published: 22 April 2015 Abstract: The internet provides the means through which a “self-activating terrorist” may first self-radicalize through some imaginary or sympathetic connection with an organized terrorist network. Additionally, the internet allows such a self-activating terrorist to move into the stage of radical violent action. The internet serves both functions by providing the lone wolf with not only a rhetorical medium for self-justification and communication through the use of “monster talk” and its converse, the rhetoric about the “good citizen,” but it is also a source for relatively inexpensive and more unpredictable technologies of mass destruction. Crucial to this analysis is the distinction between radicalization of thought and radicalization of action, as a theoretical rhetoric of radicalization does not automatically convert into a rhetoric of radical action unless there are catalysts at work. The internet, as well as imagined relations cemented by the rhetorics of “jihadi cool” or “jihadi chic,” function as these crucial
    [Show full text]