DOCSLIB.ORG

Fundamental Ambiguity in the Definition of Vertical Motion

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fundamental Ambiguity in the Definition of Vertical Motion Fundamental Ambiguity in the Definition of Vertical Motion Geoffrey Blewitt Mackay School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, USA. Abstract. Vertical motion is generally described as 2 What is Vertical Motion? motion normal to some defined horizontal surface or family of surfaces. Such a surface can be con- Vertical motion is generally defined as motion that structed geometrically or gravitationally. In the is normal to some defined horizontal surface. Thus case of a geometrical surface, the ellipsoid is the it is entirely defined by the horizontal surface itself. shape of choice. In the case of a gravitational sur- face, it needs to be specified which masses are to be 2.1. Physical Model included in the definition of the center-of-mass ori- gin, and whether the surface evolves in time along In a physical model, the horizontal surface is gener- with the configuration of mass (as in a dynamic ally taken as an equipotential surface. More cor- equipotential) or whether it is static (as in a refer- rectly, an infinite family of equipotentials define the ence geoid). Vertical motion is therefore not an ab- direction of vertical motions everywhere. The di- solute concept, but rather one of convenience and rection of vertical motion follows a “plumb-line” convention. Even if properly defined, the ability to trajectory, which is generally curved. realize vertical displacement coordinates may be Despite its physical nature, there are many ways limited by uncertainty in the relationship between to define vertical motion within this class of model. observed quantities and the frame definition. Thus Most fundamentally, “equipotential” is not an abso- discrepancies between two analysis groups’ results lute concept, as it depends on the local relativistic on vertical station velocities may not be a result of frame. The equivalence principle states that accel- systematic error, but rather may simply reflect in- eration cannot be distinguished from gravity, hence ability to realize the same reference frame. equipotential surfaces be different in frames that accelerate relative to one another. Keywords. Vertical, reference frame, ellipsoid, One obvious cause of acceleration is rotation. gravity, gravitation, geoid, equipotential, sea level. Co-rotating frames therefore “see” different equipo- tential surfaces. Since Earth rotation is far from constant, this presents a problem. A conventional 1 Issues for Discussion solution is to adopt some defined constant angular velocity for Earth rotation, thus enforcing a conven- Vertical motion is an ambiguous term, in the sense tional centrifugal contribution to the equipotential. that vertical displacement coordinates depend on the In this case, it is typical to define “gravity” as being adopted conventions of the reference frame and equal to “gravitation” plus the conventional (rather coordinate system, and the ability to realize such a than actual) “centrifugal” term. Gravitation is here reference frame in practice. This paper addresses understood to be in a quasi-inertial local-Earth the roots of this ambiguity by posing the question, frame, co-orbiting the Sun along with the Earth sys- “what is vertical motion?” We identify different tem’s center of mass, and so is the Earth system’s classes of defined vertical motion, which are based gravity field as sensed by orbiting satellites, after on physical, geometric, and hybrid models. accounting for solar system gravitational forces. By analyzing this ambiguity, we investigate to However this is only one possibility. what extent differences between these models are Note that other choices of origin and rotation predictable. Part of the answer of course lies with create additional fictitious (non-inertial) forces and reference frames and reference system conventions. so have different equipotential surfaces. Other pos- Finally, we address the implications for ambigu- sibilities are frames that co-rotate with no-net rota- ity in vertical motion, including its effect in inter- tion with respect to the Earth’s surface, which raises comparison of vertical motion results, and on scien- the further issue of whether this condition is im- tific interpretation of vertical motions. posed as a long term average, or instantaneously as Earth rotation varies. The dynamic interpretation of vertical motion therefore strictly requires accounting same technique by two different analysis groups). for the choice of frame in this respect. In most cases the choice may not matter for practical pur- 2.3. Hybrid Model poses, however the theoretical distinctions must be kept in mind if we are to catch those few instances In a hybrid model, the horizontal surface is gener- of scientific interpretation where it does actually ally taken as a conventional ellipsoid, however the matter. center of the ellipsoid is typically taken as the Earth center of mass (as a function of time). Defining the 2.2. Geometric Model center in a physical way helps to resolve at least one source of ambiguity, although in practice different In a geometric model, the horizontal surface is gen- techniques produce slightly different solutions for erally taken as a conventional ellipsoid (sometimes the location of the Earth’s center of mass. Another referred to as a “datum”). In this system, vertical problem here is that the origin is typically taken as motion is defined as motion along a straight line that the center of mass of the whole Earth system (to intersects the ellipsoid at right angles. This is very which satellite orbits are sensitive), however the different than in the physical model, where pure solid Earth itself (approximately an ellipsoid) must vertical motion does not generally follow a straight move with respect to this point as mass is redistrib- line. uted in its fluid envelope. So we have a situation There are as many ways to define vertical motion where in reality, the ellipsoid should really be mov- within this class of model as there are possible sets ing, but in a typical CTRF this is not modeled (or of ellipsoids. The typical convention is to adopt a not adequately modeled). The definition of vertical perfectly circular equator, in which case the ellip- motion in the hybrid model will depend on whether soid’s internal geometry is defined by two parame- or not this “geocenter motion” is modeled, or ters: the radius of the equator, and the flattening whether or not models specify time evolution of the factor. The external geometry (defining the location solid Earth’s deforming surface. and orientation of the ellipsoid in space) is defined by an additional six parameters: three for the origin, 3 Analyzing the Ambiguity two to define the orientation of the polar axis of symmetry, and one to define the origin of longitude From the above discussion, it is clear that “vertical (the prime meridian). Note that the ellipoid’s exter- motion” is not an absolute concept. From this con- nal geometry, including its center, is in practice de- clusion we can logically deduce the following corol- fined implicitly by a defined set of station coordi- laries. Since vertical and horizontal motion as de- nates and their evolution in time. This is called the fined above span 3-dimensional space, therefore “conventional terrestrial reference frame”, or CTRF. horizontal motion too is not absolute. From this we Even if we can all agree on a convention for the can infer that vertical motion in one reference sys- ellipsoid’s internal geometry, it is more difficult to tem can appear horizontal in another, and vice be consistent in the definition of the external ge- versa. ometry, because this requires consistency in the various CTRFs. For example, different techniques 3.1. Reference Frame Issues use different stations, and so convention would re- quire the adoption of accurate “local ties” between One might at this point naturally ask whether or (nearby) co-located stations. There would also need not these apparent differences are predictable, and to be consistency in the time evolution of the station in what cases are the differences accentuated or ex- coordinates. treme. Logically, the most extreme case is where In any situation where two groups have adopted a pure vertical motion in one system appears as pure different set of stations defining a CTRF, the defini- horizontal motion in another. As ridiculous as this tion of vertical motion will of course be different. may appear, there is actually such a case that corre- Differences in vertical motion between two different sponds to a very real physical phenomenon! frames are typically significant (much larger than An explanation of this phenomenon requires a inherent measurement precision), especially if there fundamental consideration of reference frame the- is relative motion between the origins of the two ory, as explained in Blewitt [2003], with further frames. This is major source of confusion when discussion in Blewitt and Clarke [2003], where it comparing vertical velocities of individual sites be- was shown how a perfect sphere deforms to another tween two different techniques (and even within the perfect sphere when subjected to a degree-1 spheri- cal harmonic surface load. Moreover, the sphere is loading models that use a proportional relationship displaced in inertial space due to conservation of between vertical displacement and barometric pres- momentum, such that the center of mass of the solid sure). In that case, the CL frame is implicitly as- Earth moves in response to a change in center of sumed. Another model might assume a priori that mass of the surface load. Depending on the choice surface motions are entirely horizontal (e.g., rigid of reference frame, the resulting vector field of sur- plate rotations). In this case, the CH frame is im- face displacements can appear either purely vertical, plicitly assumed. or purely horizontal. The is illustrated in Figure 1, Given that there are so many possible frames that which appears in Blewitt [2003]: are being used in either modeling or in space geo- detic analysis, it is imperative that care be taken to account for those frame differences when attempting to interpret station motions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 3 Rectangular Coordinate System and Graphs
    06022_CH03_123-154.QXP 10/29/10 10:56 AM Page 123 3 Rectangular Coordinate System and Graphs In This Chapter A Bit of History Every student of mathematics pays the French mathematician René Descartes (1596–1650) hom- 3.1 The Rectangular Coordinate System age whenever he or she sketches a graph. Descartes is consid- ered the inventor of analytic geometry, which is the melding 3.2 Circles and Graphs of algebra and geometry—at the time thought to be completely 3.3 Equations of Lines unrelated fields of mathematics. In analytic geometry an equa- 3.4 Variation tion involving two variables could be interpreted as a graph in Chapter 3 Review Exercises a two-dimensional coordinate system embedded in a plane. The rectangular or Cartesian coordinate system is named in his honor. The basic tenets of analytic geometry were set forth in La Géométrie, published in 1637. The invention of the Cartesian plane and rectangular coordinates contributed significantly to the subsequent development of calculus by its co-inventors Isaac Newton (1643–1727) and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646–1716). René Descartes was also a scientist and wrote on optics, astronomy, and meteorology. But beyond his contributions to mathematics and science, Descartes is also remembered for his impact on philosophy. Indeed, he is often called the father of modern philosophy and his book Meditations on First Philosophy continues to be required reading to this day at some universities. His famous phrase cogito ergo sum (I think, there- fore I am) appears in his Discourse on the Method and Principles of Philosophy. Although he claimed to be a fervent In Section 3.3 we will see that parallel lines Catholic, the Church was suspicious of Descartes’philosophy have the same slope.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Graviresponse and Biological Effects of Vertical and Horizontal Clinorotation in Arabidopsis Thaliana Root Tip
    plants Article Analysis of Graviresponse and Biological Effects of Vertical and Horizontal Clinorotation in Arabidopsis thaliana Root Tip Alicia Villacampa 1 , Ludovico Sora 1,2 , Raúl Herranz 1 , Francisco-Javier Medina 1 and Malgorzata Ciska 1,* 1 Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas Margarita Salas-CSIC, Ramiro de Maeztu 9, 28040 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] (A.V.); [email protected] (L.S.); [email protected] (R.H.); [email protected] (F.-J.M.) 2 Department of Aerospace Science and Technology, Politecnico di Milano, Via La Masa 34, 20156 Milano, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-91-837-3112 (ext. 4260); Fax: +34-91-536-0432 Abstract: Clinorotation was the first method designed to simulate microgravity on ground and it remains the most common and accessible simulation procedure. However, different experimental set- tings, namely angular velocity, sample orientation, and distance to the rotation center produce different responses in seedlings. Here, we compare A. thaliana root responses to the two most commonly used velocities, as examples of slow and fast clinorotation, and to vertical and horizontal clinorotation. We investigate their impact on the three stages of gravitropism: statolith sedimentation, asymmetrical auxin distribution, and differential elongation. We also investigate the statocyte ultrastructure by electron microscopy. Horizontal slow clinorotation induces changes in the statocyte ultrastructure related to a stress response and internalization of the PIN-FORMED 2 (PIN2) auxin transporter in the lower endodermis, probably due to enhanced mechano-stimulation. Additionally, fast clinorotation, Citation: Villacampa, A.; Sora, L.; as predicted, is only suitable within a very limited radius from the clinorotation center and triggers Herranz, R.; Medina, F.-J.; Ciska, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Vertical and Horizontal Transcendence Ursula Goodenough Washington University in St Louis, [email protected]
    Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship Biology Faculty Publications & Presentations Biology 3-2001 Vertical and Horizontal Transcendence Ursula Goodenough Washington University in St Louis, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/bio_facpubs Part of the Biology Commons, and the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Goodenough, Ursula, "Vertical and Horizontal Transcendence" (2001). Biology Faculty Publications & Presentations. 93. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/bio_facpubs/93 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Biology at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biology Faculty Publications & Presentations by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL TRANSCENDENCE Ursula Goodenough Draft of article published in Zygon 36: 21-31 (2001) ABSTRACT Transcendence is explored from two perspectives: the traditional concept wherein the origination of the sacred is “out there,” and the alternate concept wherein the sacred originates “here.” Each is evaluated from the perspectives of aesthetics and hierarchy. Both forms of transcendence are viewed as essential to the full religious life. KEY WORDS: transcendence, green spirituality, sacredness, aesthetics, hierarchy VERTICAL TRANSCENDENCE One of the core themes of the monotheistic traditions, and many Asian traditions as well, is the concept of transcendence. A description of this orientation from comparative religionist Michael Kalton (2000) can serve to anchor our discussion. "Transcendence" both describes a metaphysical structure grounding the contingent in the Absolute, and a practical spiritual quest of rising above changing worldly affairs to ultimate union with the Eternal.
    [Show full text]
  • Electronics-Technici
    WORLD'S LARGEST ELECTRONIC TRADE CIRCULATION Tips on Color Servicir Color TV Horizontal Problems How to Choose and Use Controls Troubleshooting Transistor Circuits MAY 1965 ENirr The quality goes in before the name goes on FOR THE FINEST COLOR AND UHF RECEPTION INSTALL ZENITH QUALITY ANTENNAS ... to assure finer performance in difficult reception areas! More color TV sets and new UHF stations mean new antenna installation jobs for you. Proper installation with antennas of Zenith quality is most important because of the sensi tivity of color and JHF signals. ZENITH ALL -CHANNEL VHF/UHF/FM AND FM -STEREO LOG -PERIODIC ANTENNAS The unusually broad bandwidth of the new Zenith VHF/UHF/FM and FM -Stereo log -periodic resonant V -dipole arrays pulls in all frequencies from 50 to 900 mc-television channels 2 to 83 /\' plus FM radio. The multi -mode operation pro- vides nigh gain and good rejection of ghosts. These frequency independent antennas, devel- , oped // by the research laboratories at the University of Illinois, are designed according to a geometrically derived logarithmic -periodic formula used in satellite telemetry. ZENITH QUALITY HEAVY-DUTY ZENITH QUALITY ANTENNA ROTORS WIRE AND CABLE Zenith quality antenna rotors are Zenith features a full line of quality heavy-duty throughout-with rugged packaged wire and cable. Also espe- motor and die-cast aluminum hous- cially designed UHF transmission ing. Turns a 150-Ib. antenna 360 de- wires, sold only by Zenith. Zenith grees in 45 seconds. The weather- wire and cable is engineered for proof bell casting protects the unit greater reception and longer life, from the elements.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Physics Misconceptions at the Circus: the Case of Circular Motion
    PHYSICAL REVIEW PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH 16, 010134 (2020) Identifying physics misconceptions at the circus: The case of circular motion Alexander Volfson,1 Haim Eshach,1 and Yuval Ben-Abu2,3,* 1Department of Science Education & Technology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel 2Department of Physics and Project Unit, Sapir Academic College, Sderot, Hof Ashkelon 79165, Israel 3Clarendon laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, United Kingdom (Received 17 November 2019; accepted 31 March 2020; published 2 June 2020) Circular motion is embedded in many circus tricks, and is also one of the most challenging topics for both students and teachers. Previous studies have identified several misconceptions about circular motion, and especially about the forces that act upon a rotating object. A commonly used demonstration of circular motion laws by physics teachers is spinning a bucket full of water in the vertical plane further explaining why the water did not spill out when the bucket was upside down. One of the central misconceptions regarding circular motion is the existence of so-called centrifugal force: Students mistakenly believe that when an object spins in a circular path, there is real force acting on the object in the radial direction pulling it out of the path. Thus, one of the most frequently observed naïve explanations is that the gravity force mg is compensated by the centrifugal force on the top of the circular trajectory and thus, water does not spill down. In the present study we decided to change the context of the problem from a usual physics class demonstration to a relatively unusual informal environment of a circus show and investigate the spectators’ ideas regarding circular motion in this context.
    [Show full text]
  • Projectile Motion Motion in Two Dimensions
    Projectile Motion Motion In Two Dimensions We restrict ourselves to objects thrown near the Earth’s surface so that gravity can be considered constant. Objectives 1. For a projectile, describe the changes in the horizontal and vertical components of its velocity, when air resistance is negligible. 2. Explain why a projectile moves equal distances horizontally in equal time intervals when air resistance is negligible. 3. Describe satellites as fast moving projectiles. Projectile motion applies to sports. Projectile motion applies to destructive projectiles. A projectile is any object that moves through the air or through space, acted on only by gravity (and air resistance). The motion of a projectile is determined only by the object’s initial velocity, launch angle and gravity. Projectile motion is a combination of horizontal motion and vertical motion. The horizontal motion of a projectile is constant because no gravitational force acts horizontally The vertical motion of a projected object is independent of its horizontal motion. Let's say a Wiley coyote runs off a cliff. As he leaves the cliff he has a horizontal velocity. As soon as the coyote leaves the cliff he will experience a vertical force due to gravity. This force will cause him to start to accelerate in the vertical direction. As he falls he will be going faster and faster in the vertical direction The horizontal and vertical components of the motion of an object going off a cliff are Y separate from each other, and can not affect each other. X In a lot of books you will see the horizontal component called x and the vertical component called y.
    [Show full text]
  • The Polar Coordinate System
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln MAT Exam Expository Papers Math in the Middle Institute Partnership 7-2008 The Polar Coordinate System Alisa Favinger University of Nebraska-Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/mathmidexppap Part of the Science and Mathematics Education Commons Favinger, Alisa, "The Polar Coordinate System" (2008). MAT Exam Expository Papers. 12. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/mathmidexppap/12 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Math in the Middle Institute Partnership at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in MAT Exam Expository Papers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. The Polar Coordinate System Alisa Favinger Cozad, Nebraska In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Arts in Teaching with a Specialization in the Teaching of Middle Level Mathematics in the Department of Mathematics. Jim Lewis, Advisor July 2008 Polar Coordinate System ~ 1 Representing a position in a two-dimensional plane can be done several ways. It is taught early in Algebra how to represent a point in the Cartesian (or rectangular) plane. In this plane a point is represented by the coordinates (x, y), where x tells the horizontal distance from the origin and y the vertical distance. The polar coordinate system is an alternative to this rectangular system. In this system, instead of a point being represented by (x, y) coordinates, a point is represented by (r, θ) where r represents the length of a straight line from the point to the origin and θ represents the angle that straight line makes with the horizontal axis.
    [Show full text]
  • Latitude and Longitude Tools of the Trade Tools of the Trade
    Latitude and Longitude Tools of the Trade Tools of the Trade Mathematicians use graphs, formulas, theorems, and calculators to help them analyze data and calculate answers. Scientists use beakers, balances, and thermometers to conduct their research. Historians use timelines. What specialized tools do geographers use to analyze and apply geographic data that lead to practical solutions? Maps Geographers use maps to locate places, analyze spatial relationships, and predict future trends. A map is a flat representation of Earth, or at least a portion of it. Maps can represent large or small areas, but most are foldable and portable. Maps can show an incredible amount of detail that other tools (globes, satellite, or space shuttle photographs) cannot illustrate, or they can show an overview of the entire world. What are the advantages of a map? Grid Lines Grid lines and other imaginary lines should be included on almost every map because they are necessary tools that help the user identify specific locations on the map. For instance, when looking at a political map of the United States, latitude and longitude lines assist the user in finding specific cities, national parks, or other points of interest. Underline the key phrases. Latitude Lines of latitude are imaginary horizontal lines, running east and west, parallel to the equator, that measure distances north and south of the equator. Underline the key phrases. Trace 3 lines of LATITUDE in RED. Equator The equator is where the sun hits Earth most directly, and so it has a measurement of 0° N/S. As the air begins to warm, it rises.
    [Show full text]
  • EPSS 15 Spring 2017 Introduction to Oceanography
    4/7/17 EPSS 15 Spring 2017 Introduction to Oceanography Laboratory #1 Maps, Cross-sections, Vertical Exaggeration, Graphs, and Contour Skills MAPS • Provide valuable interface to explore the geography of the world • Incorporate quantifiable units • Have scales equating distances on the surface of the earth with distances on the surface of the map (1cm = 1000km or 1mm =100km) 1 4/7/17 Maps, continued • Latitudes are measured • Longitudes are measured from 0 – 90 degrees north from 0 - 180 degrees east and south of the equator; and west of the prime they mark points of equal meridian, which runs from the angle above and below the north to south pole through equator Greenwich, England Parallels of Latitude Meridians of Longitude Cross-Sections • Present a side view of the earth • Depth dimension allows for description of the interior of the Earth and subsurface of the oceans. • In this class, we are primarily interested in cross-sections illustrating vertical profiles generated through our oceans, and what they can tell us about changes in salinity, temperature, etc and the surface shape of the ocean’s floor. • The next page shows a portion of an actual cross-section of part of the earth’s crust below the town of Santa Barbara, CA…. 2 4/7/17 Cross-Sections Elevation (meters) Distance Scale: __cm = __m (meters) Fault Geologic formation contact Bedding • This was generated using geometric data observed from the surface of the earth between two points, & shows the predicted subsurface geometry of rocks. Cross-Sections Northridge Earthquake Davis & Namson, 1994 Elevation (meters) Distance Scale is 1 inch = 500 feet (meters) Fault Geologic formation contact Bedding • This was generated using geometric data observed from the surface of the earth between two points, & shows the predicted subsurface geometry of rocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Tides and Overtides in Long Island Sound
    Journal of Marine Research, 68, 1–36, 2010 Journal of MARINE RESEARCH Volume 68, Number 1 Tides and Overtides in Long Island Sound by Diane C. Bennett1,2, James O’Donnell1, W. Frank Bohlen1 and Adam Houk1 ABSTRACT Using observations obtained by acoustic Doppler profilers and coastal water level recorders, we describe the vertical and horizontal structure of the currents and sea level due to the principal tidal constituents in Long Island Sound, a shallow estuary in southern New England. As expected, the observations reveal that M2 is the dominant constituent in both sea surface and velocity at all depths and sites. We also find evidence that the vertical structure of the M2 tidal current ellipse parameters vary with the seasonal evolution of vertical stratification at some sites. By comparing our estimates of the vertical structure of the M2 amplitudes to model predictions, we demonstrate that both uniform and vertically variable, time invariant eddy viscosities are not consistent with our measurements in the Sound. The current records from the western Sound contain significant overtides at the M4 and M6 frequencies with amplitudes and phases that are independent of depth. Though the M4 amplitude decreases to the west in proportion to M2, the M6 amplifies. Since the dynamics that generate overtides also produce tidal residuals, this provides a sensitive diagnostic of the performances of numerical circulation models. We demonstrate that the observed along-Sound structure of the amplitude of the M4 and M6 overtides is only qualitatively consistent with the predictions of a nonlinear, laterally averaged layer model forced by a mean flow and sea level at the boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Are You? Mathematics
    underground Where are you? mathematics What do you do when you are lost? If you are lucky enough to have a smart phone, you’ll probably use the GPS feature. This pin-points your global coordinates using information sent from satellites (see Conic sections in real life). But what are those global coordinates? Ordinary flat maps are often divided up into a grid formed by vertical and horizontal lines. The resulting grid boxes are usually labelled by letters (A, B, C, etc.) in the horizontal direction, and by numbers (1,2,3, etc.) in the vertical direction. To find a location, say a particular street in your home town, you look up its coordinates, for example A4, in the index, and then find the grid box labelled by that letter and number. The street youare looking for will be within this box. Navigation around the spherical Earth uses the same idea, only here the grid isn’t formed by straight lines but by circles that lie on the surface of the Earth. One set of circles (which we can think of as horizontal) comes from planes that are perpendicular to the rotation axis of the Earth. These slice right through the Earth, meeting its surface in circles which are called lines of latitude. The radii of these circles vary: the largest one is the equator, which chops the Earth neatly into northern and southern hemispheres. As you move north or south the circles become smaller, and at the poles they are just points. The other set of circles (which we can think of as the vertical lines) come from planes that slice right through the Earth and contain the axis around which it rotates.
    [Show full text]
  • STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM 12(I)
    August 2002 STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM 12(i) Table of Contents Section Page 12.1 SURVEY DATUM CONSIDERATIONS........................................................................... 12.1(1) 12.1.1 Purpose of Survey Datums..................................................................................... 12.1(1) 12.1.2 Vertical Control Datum.......................................................................................... 12.1(1) 12.1.3 Horizontal Control Datum ..................................................................................... 12.1(2) 12.2 LOCATION AND SURVEY METHODS ........................................................................... 12.2(1) 12.2.1 Limitations of Plane Surveying.............................................................................. 12.2(1) 12.2.1.1 Effects of the Earth’s Curvature........................................................... 12.2(1) 12.2.1.2 Relationships of Independent Surveys ................................................. 12.2(1) 12.2.2 Positioning By Latitude and Longitude ................................................................. 12.2(1) 12.2.3 Benefits of Geodetic Surveying ............................................................................. 12.2(1) 12.2.4 State Plane Coordinate Systems............................................................................. 12.2(2) 12.3 THE MONTANA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM .......................................... 12.3(1) 12.3.1 Montana State Statute ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]