DOCSLIB.ORG

Brisbane Common Ground Evaluation: Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Brisbane Common Ground Evaluation: Final Report University of Pennsylvania From the SelectedWorks of Dennis P. Culhane December, 2015 Brisbane Common Ground Evaluation: Final Report Cameron Parsell, University of Queensland Maree Petersen, University of Queensland Ornella Moutou Dennis P Culhane Ed Lucio, University of Queensland, et al. Available at: https://works.bepress.com/dennis_culhane/229/ Brisbane Common Ground Evaluation: Final Report PREPARED FOR: THE QUEENSLAND STATE GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND PUBLIC WORK ISSR RESEARCH REPORT Submitted: December 2015 ABN: 63 942 912 684 Institute for Social Science Research Level 4, General Purpose North No.3 (Building 39A) The University of Queensland 4072 Telephone: (07) 3346 7646 | Facsimile: (07) 3346 7646 Institute for Social Science Research Director Professor Mark Western BA(Hons) PhD FASSA CRICOS PROVIDER NUMBER 00025B Acknowledgements The research team are grateful for the assistance provided by Dr Genevieve Dingle. Dr Dingle provided expert advice about the use of validated measures. Staff at Micah Projects and Common Ground Queensland provided significant assistance to the research team throughout the evaluation. Without the continued assistance provided by Micah Projects and Common Ground Queensland, particularly the assistance provided making contact with tenants, the evaluation would not have been possible. Dr Troy Allard also generously gave his expertise to assist with police costing analysis. We received phenomenal support from many sectors of the Queensland Government to access tenant’s administrative data. Initially Catherine Ryan from the Department of Communities, Child Safety and Disability Services and Karen Cosgrove from the Queensland Treasury, were extremely significant in setting up access to enable administrate data. Many people subsequently played important roles in facilitating administrative data access, Ben Wilkinson, Trisha Johnston and Shane Warren were extremely helpful. Thanks also to Ann Harrington, Leah Hodson, Claire Slater, Janet Moncrieff, John Gomes, Kristen Breed, and Melanie Stacey. Catherine Taylor, Principle Data Linkage Officer at Queensland Health, made continued and outstanding contributions to all components of the administrative data. Without Catherine Taylor’s astute capacities the analysis of administrative data would not have been possible. Finally, and as demonstrated throughout this report, tenants’ contributions constitute a central component of this evaluation. The research team relied heavily on tenant participation. We thank the tenants for positively enabling the research team to conduct this research in their homes. Institute for Social Science Research The University of Queensland T +61 7 3346 7344 E [email protected] Brisbane QLD 4072 Australia F + 61 7 3346 7646 W www.issr.uq.edu.au ii Institute for Social Science Research Director Professor Mark Western BA(Hons) PhD FASSA CRICOS PROVIDER NUMBER 00025B Printed Last saved 18 December 2015 File name Final Report Authors Cameron Parsell, Maree Petersen, Ornella Moutou, Dennis Culhane, Ed Lucio, and Alan Dick ISSR Director Mark Western Name of project Evaluation of the Brisbane Common Ground Initiative Name of organisation Queensland Government Project number ISSR020387 Institute for Social Science Research The University of Queensland T +61 7 3346 7344 E [email protected] Brisbane QLD 4072 Australia F + 61 7 3346 7646 W www.issr.uq.edu.au iii Table of Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................1 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................7 1.1.1 Purpose of the evaluation ...............................................................................................8 1.1.2 Structure of the report ................................................................................................. 11 2 Research Design ............................................................................................................... 12 2.1.1 Literature review .......................................................................................................... 12 2.1.2 Tenancy database ....................................................................................................... 12 2.1.3 Analysis of financial documents .................................................................................. 12 2.1.4 Tenant qualitative interviews ....................................................................................... 13 2.1.5 Stakeholder qualitative interviews ............................................................................... 13 2.1.6 Housing and support satisfaction survey .................................................................... 14 2.1.7 Longitudinal tenant outcomes survey .......................................................................... 15 2.1.8 Tenant service utilisation data ..................................................................................... 18 2.1.10 Limitations ................................................................................................................... 19 3 Supportive housing: a review of the literature ................................................................... 21 3.1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 21 3.1.2 What is supportive housing? ....................................................................................... 21 3.1.3 Who is supportive housing for? ................................................................................... 23 3.1.4 The aims of supportive housing .................................................................................. 24 3.1.5 History of supportive housing ...................................................................................... 24 3.1.6 What is the evidence for supportive housing? ............................................................ 26 3.1.7 Housing sustainment and homelessness exits ........................................................... 26 3.1.8 Elements of success ................................................................................................... 29 3.1.9 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 30 4 Formative evaluation ......................................................................................................... 32 4.1.1 Has Brisbane Common Ground been implemented as intended, and how well is the initiative managed? ..................................................................................................................... 33 4.1.2 What factors have impacted (positively or negatively) upon implementation? ........... 37 4.1.3 What are the tenancy assessment processes, and how do they contribute to or undermine the intended allocation of properties and tenant mix? .............................................. 43 4.1.4 How is support provided, and are the tenancy managers and support providers working collaboratively? .............................................................................................................. 49 4.1.5 How is access to mainstream and allied service providers achieved, and is it successful? .................................................................................................................................. 54 5 Post-Occupancy evaluation .............................................................................................. 57 5.1.1 How is Brisbane Common Ground rated by tenants, and what are tenants’ preferences for housing and support? ........................................................................................ 57 5.1.2 Is Brisbane Common Ground people’s home? ........................................................... 59 5.1.3 Is Brisbane Common Ground a safe, comfortable and desirable place to live, and what contributes to and undermines this? Is the concierge providing a controlled, safe and welcoming environment?............................................................................................................. 62 5.1.4 In what ways do tenants use or avoid using the building, and what could contribute to more positive or less negative use? ........................................................................................ 67 Institute for Social Science Research The University of Queensland T +61 7 3346 7344 E [email protected] Brisbane QLD 4072 Australia F + 61 7 3346 7646 W www.issr.uq.edu.au iv 5.1.5 What is the impact of the tenant mix (reduced stigma, social interactions, role modelling)? .................................................................................................................................. 75 5.1.6 How do neighbours perceive Brisbane Common Ground? ......................................... 78 5.1.7 Is Brisbane Common Ground a (or developing to be) community resource? ............. 79 6 Longitudinal research and tenant outcomes ..................................................................... 81 6.1.1 What housing outcomes, including sustainability, has Brisbane Common Ground achieved? .................................................................................................................................... 81 6.1.2 What health, quality of life, socio and economic participation, and social and community
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Homelessness a System Perspective
    Homelessness A System Perspective Christian Seelos1 Global Innovation for Impact Lab, Stanford University PACS How to cite: Seelos, C (2021) Homelessness. A System Perspective (Part 1). Case Study_2021_001, Global Innovation for Impact Lab at Stanford PACS. 1 I am grateful to my colleagues Johanna Mair and Charlotte Traeger for joint interviews and reflection sessions throughout the work on this case study. Table of Contents Part 1 - The emergence of homelessness as a social problem The 1960s – Wars on poverty we can’t win… _____________________________________ 5 Contemporary frames of poverty __________________________________________________ 6 Challenges of addressing complex social problems ____________________________________ 6 The 1970s – Setting the course for homelessness _________________________________ 10 The undeserving poor: Framing the problem of homelessness __________________________ 10 A troubling situation but not a social problem _______________________________________ 12 The 1980s – Homelessness emerges as a social problem ___________________________ 14 Homeless numbers-games and convenient explanations ______________________________ 15 The awakening of homelessness activism ___________________________________________ 16 Radical activism _______________________________________________________________ 17 Research and documentation ____________________________________________________ 17 Litigation _____________________________________________________________________ 19 Dedicated organizations ________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Sheltering the Homeless: Social Mobility Along the Continuum of Care
    Sheltering the Homeless: Social Mobility Along the Continuum of Care Charles Hoch Professor Lynette Bowden Research Assistant Great Cities Institute College of Urban Planning and Public Affairs University of Illinois at Chicago A Great Cities Institute Working Paper Sheltering the Homeless: Social Mobility Along the Continuum of Care Charles Hoch Professor Lynette Bowden Research Assistant Great Cities Institute College of Urban Planning and Public Affairs University of Illinois at Chicago A Great Cities Institute Working Paper November 1998 The Great Cities Institute The Great Cities Institute is an interdisciplinary, applied urban research unit within the College of Urban Planning and Public Affairs at the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC). Its mission is to create, disseminate, and apply interdisciplinary knowledge on urban areas. Faculty from UIC and elsewhere work collaboratively on urban issues through interdisciplinary research, outreach and education projects. About the Authors Charles Hoch is a professor in the Urban Planning and Policy Program in the College of Urban Planning and Public Affairs at the University of Illinois at Chicago and was a Faculty Scholar at Great Cities Institute from fall 1997 through spring 1998. He can be reached at [email protected]. Lynette Bowden is a former research assistant at the Great Cities Institute. Additional Copies Great Cities Institute (MC 107) College of Urban Planning and Public Affairs University of Illinois at Chicago 412 S. Peoria Street, Suite 400 Chicago IL 60607-7067 Phone: 312-996-8700 FAX: 312-996-8933 Great Cities Institute Publication Number: GCP-98-3 The views expressed in this report represent those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the Great Cities Institute or the University of Illinois at Chicago.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Hostels and Temporary Accommodation
    Part A _ Articles 67 The Role of Hostels and Temporary Accommodation Volker Busch-Geertsema and Ingrid Sahlin Gesellschaft für innovative Sozialforschung und Sozialplanung (GISS), Bremen, Germany Department of Social Work, Göteborg University, Sweden >> Abstract_ The provision of hostel accommodation for those who are homeless has a long history. Despite the fact that their functions and consequences are often questioned, hostels remain a basic element in the provision of services for those who are homeless in all European countries. The aim of this paper is to consider the present-day role of homeless hostels as temporary accom- modation, and to discuss its qualities in an “ ideal ” situation. We do this through presenting and discussing the main functions allegedly served by the hostel, as well as its inherent and associated problems. Following a brief review of housing-led approaches to reduce homelessness, we suggest minimum requirements concerning security of tenure, standard and support if a decent quality of existing and future hostels is to be ensured. Our conclu- sion is that the reasons for hostels boil down to a need for physical shelter in emergency and transition situations where self-contained dwellings and regular hotels are unavailable or deficient. However, an organised provision of mainstream housing, let with security of tenure and coupled with support when requested by the residents is the only working solution to homelessness and would also minimise the need for homeless hostels. >> Key Words_ hostels, shelters, temporary accommodation, homeless accom- modation, security of tenure ISSN 2030-2762 / ISSN 2030-3106 online 68 European Journal of Homelessness _ Volume 1, December 2007 Introduction Hostels are perhaps the oldest institution for homeless people, existent long before there were any explicit policies to mitigate and resolve homelessness.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategies to Combat Homelessness
    Strategies to combat homelessness United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat) Nairobi, 2000 This publication has been reproduced without formal editing by the United Nations. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers of boundaries. Reference to names of firms and commercial products and processes does not imply their endorsement by the United Nations, and a failure to mention a particular firm, commercial product or process is not a sign of disapproval. Excerpts from the text may be reproduced without authorisation, on condition that the source is indicated. Cover design: Amrik Kalsi, UNCHS (Habitat), Nairobi Cover photos credits: UNCHS (Habitat), UNICEF and Mark Edwards Printing: UNON Printshop, Nairobi United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat) Nairobi, 2000 HS / 599 / 00 E ISBN 92-1-131458-5 An electronic version of this publication is available for download from the UNCHS (Habitat) web-site by August 2000. The electronic version — in compiled HTML format, allowing complex text searches — requires Microsoft Windows 98 or Microsoft Windows 95 plus Microsoft Internet Explorer (version 4 or later). United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat) publications can be obtained from UNCHS (Habitat)’s Regional Offices or directly from: United Nations Centre for Human Settlements (Habitat), Publications Unit, P.O. Box 30030, Nairobi, Kenya Fax: 254-2-604060 E-mail: [email protected] URL: http://www.unchs.org Preface Within the next few years, and for the first time in human history, more people will live in cities and towns than in rural areas.
    [Show full text]
  • HOMELESSNESS and the HOMELESS: Responses and Innovations
    HOMELESSNESS AND THE HOMELESS: Responses and Innovations A Canadian Contribution to IYSH 1987 H. Peter Oberlander and Arthur L Fallick The Centre for Human Settlements Faculty of Graduate Studies The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada HOMELESSNESS AND THE HOMELESS: RESPONSES AND INNOVATIONS A CANADIAN CONTRIBUTION TO IYSH 1987 by H. Peter Oberlander and Arthur L. Fallick ****** Centre for Human Settlements The University of British Columbia 1988 The research and publication of this report was made possible through a generous grant from Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC); the views expressed are the personal views of the authors. TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE 1 THE INTERNATIONAL YEAR OF SHELTER FOR THE HOMELESS 3 Objectives of the International Year 5 Global Conditions and the IYSH 6 Sources of Homelessness in Canada 11 Numerical Estimates 12 Canada's Homeless 13 CANADIAN INITIATIVES DURING THE INTERNATIONAL YEAR 17 Regional Initiatives 17 Traditional Support for the Poor and Disadvantaged 21 SELECTED CANADIAN SOLUTIONS 26 Criteria for Selecting Canadian Solutions 26 Demonstrating Successful Initiatives 59 A FRAMEWORK FOR ACTION BEYOND THE INTERNATIONAL YEAR 131 BIBLIOGRAPHY 141 PREFACE The International Year of Shelter for the Home­ senior and experienced colleagues together with less focussed attention on the plight of the graduate students, to discuss the issue of home­ homeless nationally and internationally. Canada lessness, review relevant papers and advise on Mortgage and Housing Corporation, Canada's approach and scope of analysis. Their collective national housing agency, served as the national contribution is deeply appreciated. focal point and supported a wide range of The haunting line drawings portraying the initiatives to identify and highlight the best homeless in their daily search for shelter, means of aiding the homeless and alleviating food, clothing and dignity of life, are the work homelessness.
    [Show full text]
  • Homelessness and Poverty: Reviewing the Links
    Heriot-Watt University Research Gateway Homelessness and poverty: reviewing the links Citation for published version: Johnsen, S & Watts, B 2014, Homelessness and poverty: reviewing the links. Heriot-Watt University. Link: Link to publication record in Heriot-Watt Research Portal Document Version: Early version, also known as pre-print General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via Heriot-Watt Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy Heriot-Watt University has made every reasonable effort to ensure that the content in Heriot-Watt Research Portal complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 30. Sep. 2021 Homelessness and Poverty: Reviewing the Links A Report for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation Anti-Poverty Programme Sarah Johnsen & Beth Watts Institute for Social Policy, Housing, Environment and Real Estate (I-SPHERE), Heriot-Watt University Acknowledgements The authors would like to extend their sincere thanks to the stakeholders interviewed for taking the time to share their knowledge and expertise. Thanks are also due to Chris Goulden, Kathleen Kelly and Suzanne Fitzpatrick for their valuable comments on an earlier draft. Contents
    [Show full text]
  • Homelessness, Victimization and Crime: Knowledge and Actionable Recommendations
    ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. HOMELESSNESS, VICTIMIZATION AND CRIME: Knowledge and Actionable Recommendations Institute for the Prevention of Crime www.prevention-crime.ca Acknowledgements This report was prepared for the Homelessness Partnering Strategy and received funding from the National Research Program of the National Homelessness Initiative. The research and recommendations are that of the Institute for the Prevention of Crime (IPC) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Housing and Homelessness Branch.
    [Show full text]
  • European Journal of Homelessness
    European Observatory on Homelessness European Journal of Homelessness Quality and Standards in Homelessness Services and Housing for Marginal Groups Volume 1 _ December 2007 194, Chaussée de Louvain n 1210 Brussels n Belgium Tel.: + 32 2 538 66 69 n Fax: + 32 2 539 41 74 [email protected] n www.feantsa.org EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HOMELESSNESS Journal Philosophy The European Journal of Homelessness provides a critical analysis of policy and practice on homelessness in Europe for policy makers, practitioners, researchers and academics. The aim is to stimulate debate on homelessness and housing exclusion at the European level and to facilitate the development of a stronger evidential base for policy development and innovation. The journal seeks to give international exposure to significant national, regional and local developments and to provide a forum for comparative analysis of policy and practice in preventing and tackling homelessness in Europe. The journal will also assess the lessons for Europe which can be derived from policy, practice and research from elsewhere. The European Journal of Homelessness is produced by FEANTSA’s European Observatory on Homelessness. Co-ordinator Bill Edgar, European Housing Research Ltd, Dundee, UK Editorial Team Joe Doherty, Centre for Housing Research, St Andrews University, UK Suzanne Fitzpatrick, Centre for Housing Policy, University of York, UK Eoin O’Sullivan, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland Core Research Team Lars Benjaminsen, SFI, The Danish National Centre for Social Research, Copenhagen, Denmark.
    [Show full text]
  • Homelessness and Health in Canada
    HOMELESSNESS AND HEALTH IN CANADA HOMELESSNESS AND HEALTH IN CANADA EDITED BY Manal Guirguis-Younger Ryan McNeil Stephen W. Hwang University of Ottawa Press 2014 The University of Ottawa Press acknowledges with gratitude the support extended to its publishing list by Heritage Canada through the Canada Book Fund, by the Canada Council for the Arts, by the Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences through the Awards to Scholarly Publications Program and by the University of Ottawa. Copy editing: Trish O’Reilly-Brennan Proofreading: Joanne Muzak Typesetting: Infographie CS Cover illustration and design: Johanna Pedersen eBook development: WildElement.ca Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Homelessness & health in Canada / edited by Manal Guirguis-Younger, Ryan McNeil, Stephen W. Hwang. Includes bibliographical references. Issued in print and electronic formats. ISBN 978-0-7766-2143-2 (pbk.).-- ISBN 978-0-7766-2148-7 (pdf).-- ISBN 978-0-7766-2147-0 (epub) 1. Homelessness--Health aspects--Canada. 2. Homeless persons-- Health and hygiene--Canada. 3. Homeless persons--Medical care--Canada. 4. Homeless persons--Government policy--Canada. 5. Homeless persons-- Canada--Social conditions. I. Guirguis-Younger, Manal, 1967- author, editor of compilation II. McNeil, Ryan, 1982- author, editor of compilation III. Hwang, Stephen, editor of compilation IV. Title: Homelessness and health in Canada. RA564.9.H63H64 2014 362.1’0425 C2014-901278-0 C2014-901279-9 © University of Ottawa Press, 2014 Printed in Canada Table of Contents
    [Show full text]
  • View from the Street 2021
    Coalition for the Homeless: View from the Street 2021 April 2021 VIEW FROM THE STREET UNSHELTERED NEW YORKERS AND THE NEED FOR SAFETY, DIGNITY, AND AGENCY By Lindsey Davis By Senior Director of Crisis Services, Coalition for the Homeless Foreword by Kim Hopper Professor of Clinical Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health Coa- lition for the Homeless: View from the Street 2021 SAFETY, DIGNITY, AGENCY 11 Coalition for the Homeless: View from the Street 2021 March 2021 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project was conceived, designed, and executed with the invaluable help of Kim Hopper, whose decades of influential work with, and on behalf of, people experiencing homelessness continues to shed light on the path forward. This project would also not have been possible without the help of Coalition for the Homeless staff who generously volunteered their time and expertise during countless late nights and early mornings, including Liz Henderson, Katie Mack, Lauren May, Jenn Solomon, Joseph Timmons, and Destini Torres. A special thanks to Steven Lopez and Juan De La Cruz without whom we would not have reached nearly as many of our unsheltered neighbors, and to Tim Campbell for helping shepherd this project through to its completion. Finally, thank you to Dave Giffen for envisioning this project with me more than three years ago and giving voice to the experience of the unsheltered New Yorkers we serve. SAFETY, DIGNITY, AGENCY 2 Coalition for the Homeless: View from the Street 2021 INTRODUCTION March 2021 Forty years ago, the Community Service Society of New York published what proved to be a momentous study of the “Homelessness has taken on a rarified connotation lives of homeless New Yorkers, Private Lives / Public Spaces, that I’m a stereotype instead of being minus a which “sought to obtain the perspective of the chronically home, and the two shouldn’t be connected, but mentally disabled as they were confronted by day-to-day they are.
    [Show full text]
  • Women, Poverty and Homelessness in Canada
    Voices: Women, Poverty and Homelessness in Canada By Rusty Neal May 2004 Voices The National Anti–Poverty Study on Homelessness Organization’s This report is dedicated to the brave women who participated in this study, and to homeless women across Canada who struggle daily for their voices to be heard. Acknowledgements Primary writer: Rusty Neal Additional writer: Sandra Bender Researcher: Marie–José Dancoste Editor: Sandra Bender Translation: Mireille Levesque Revision: Madeleine Roy Proofreading: Jennifer Wessner Preliminary Design: Margie Adam, ArtWork Final Design: Evolving Media & Design Inc. Partial Funding: National Network on Environments and Women’s Health and an anonymous NAPO donor. The National Anti–Poverty Organization 2212 Gladwin Crescent, Unit 7 Ottawa ON K1B 5N1 Canada Telephone: 613.789.0096 Facsimile: 613.789.0141 Voices: Women, Poverty and Homelessness in Canada in Homelessness and Poverty Women, ounded in 1971, as a result of the Poor People’s Conference held in Toronto, the National Anti- Poverty Organization (NAPO) is a non-profit, non-partisan organization representing the inter- ests of low-income people in Canada. Currently funded by both Human Resources Development FCanada and individual contributions, a twenty-two person board made up of of people (who either live in or have lived in poverty as some point in their lives) from every province and territory in Canada governs the work of the organization. NAPO assists local and regional organizations of low–income people in Canada to comment on processes in their communities and to help these organizations influence the national debate in which NAPO has an active interest. To this end, NAPO produces reports, fact sheets and press statements and sponsors court challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating Housing, Healthcare and Employment Supports to Solve Homelessness
    Integrating Housing, Healthcare and Employment Supports to Solve Homelessness Kerry Lange, MPA candidate School of Public Administration University of Victoria March 2016 Client: Rob Turnbull, Chief Executive Officer Streetohome Foundation Supervisor: Dr. Barton Cunningham School of Public Administration, University of Victoria Second Reader: Dr. Budd L. Hall School of Public Administration, University of Victoria Chair: Dr. Rebecca Warburton School of Public Administration, University of Victoria ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author would like to express his sincere gratitude to the following people and organizations: The Streetohome Foundation—for providing the opportunity to research best practices in integrated service delivery to homeless people. Dr. Rob Turnbull, CEO—for the opportunity to write this research and for his feedback and encouragement. Writing this research has been an enlightening and eye-opening journey—one I am glad to have made. Dr. Kimberley Speers—for recommending Streetohome Foundation as a client and for her encouragement to move forward with my project. Dr. Barton Cunningham—for being a calm and encouraging supervisor, who kept in touch even when I forgot and did not flinch when presented with an issue. My wife, Cornelia—for unselfishly giving me the days, evenings, weekends, and holidays to lock myself away to complete this research. Although locked away, I could always feel your support. When I came out of my “cave,” you were always there. I could not have worked day-to-day and also completed this research without your endless patience, understanding, and support. Thank you to everyone who contributed. You were generous with your time. I enjoyed listening to everyone and learning.
    [Show full text]