Why Are We Considering the Sellwood Bridge Project?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Why Are We Considering the Sellwood Bridge Project? FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AND FINAL SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION Sellwood Bridge SE Tacoma Street and Oregon 43 Multnomah County, Oregon Federal Highway Administration | Oregon Department of Transportation | Multnomah County August 2010 In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, alternative formats of this document will be made available upon request. Printed on recycled and recyclable paper Fact Sheet Project Title Two public briefings, an open house, and a public hearing were held in November and December Sellwood Bridge Project 2008. After public and agency comments were Project Description fully considered and evaluated, Alternative D was identified as the preferred alternative. The Sellwood Bridge project would rehabilitate Alternative D, which has been refined to address or replace the Sellwood Bridge located in public and agency comments and minimize Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon. The impacts, is evaluated as Alternative D Refined in bridge crosses the Willamette River on the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS). SE Tacoma Street on the east end and intersects Therefore, the FEIS evaluates a No Build with Oregon 43 (OR 43, also known as Alternative, the five Build alternatives evaluated in SW Macadam Avenue) on the west end. The the DEIS, and the preferred alternative following four main issues identify the need for (Alternative D Refined). this project: Under the No Build Alternative, the existing • Inadequate structural integrity to safely infrastructure would remain the same and the accommodate various vehicle types (including bridge would continue to operate as it does transit vehicles, trucks, and emergency today. The bridge, west-side interchange vehicles) and to withstand moderate seismic configuration, and east-side bridge approach events would not change. Multnomah County has • Substandard and unsafe roadway design identified maintenance activities under the No Build Alternative that would be necessary to keep • Substandard pedestrian and bicycle facilities the bridge operational and in as good a condition across the river as possible for the next 20 years. • Existing and future travel demands between The following list identifies the Build alternatives origins and destinations served by the evaluated in the FEIS. Sellwood Bridge exceed available capacity • Alternative A would rehabilitate the existing A Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS), bridge for motorized vehicles and would add which was distributed in November 2008, a separate bicycle/pedestrian bridge 300 feet evaluated a No Build Alternative and five Build north of the existing bridge. The river alternatives, lettered A through E. The Build crossing would be closed during alternatives were assembled from compatible construction. combinations of alignments, bridge cross- sections, bridge design types, west-end • Alternative B would rehabilitate the existing interchange types, and east-end intersection bridge and widen it on the north side. It types. These features were evaluated within the would include the option for a temporary context of individual Build alternatives. However, detour bridge to keep the river crossing open some features could be substituted into other during construction. alternatives. • Alternative C would consist of a double- deck bridge replacement on the existing Sellwood Bridge Project Final Environmental Impact Statement 3 Fact Sheet alignment. The river crossing would be closed can be obtained free of charge by contacting during construction. Multnomah County at: • Alternative D would consist of a Mike Pullen replacement bridge on the existing alignment, Multnomah County Public Affairs Office widened to the south. The river crossing (503) 988-6804 would remain open during construction. Printed copies of the FEIS are available at select • Alternative E would replace the existing Multnomah County and Clackamas County bridge on a new alignment to the north. The libraries, and other locations (see the river crossing would remain open during Distribution List in Appendix E of the FEIS). construction. Anticipated Permits and • Alternative D Refined (the preferred Approvals alternative) includes design refinements to Anticipated permits and approvals that would be Alternative D to address public and agency required for the project include the following: comments received on the DEIS, and to minimize environmental impacts, which Federal included the refinement of: • Federal Highway Administration − OR 43 footprint to reduce park impacts − Section 4(f) of the U.S. Department of Transportation Act of 1966 − Pedestrian and bicyclist facilities to • National Park Service improve access, improve safety, and − Section 6(f) of the Land and Water reduce park and natural resource impacts Conservation Act (Alternative A only) − A driveway access to improve safety and • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers/Oregon reduce park impacts Department of State Lands − Clean Water Act, Section 404 − The width of the bridge deck on the − Oregon's Removal-Fill Law west-end − Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act − An access roadway footprint to • U.S. Coast Guard accommodate a future streetcar line − Section 9 of the Rivers and Harbors Act For a complete description of the alternatives, • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service/National Marine see Chapter 2 of the FEIS. Fisheries Service − Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act Lead Agencies Consultation; Biological Opinion Multnomah County − Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Federal Highway Administration − Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation Oregon Department of Transportation and Management Act − Migratory Bird Treaty Act Document Availability State The FEIS can be accessed at www.sellwoodbridge.org. Readers can follow a • Oregon Department of Agriculture link from that page to a page to submit comments − Oregon Endangered Species Act (Plants) online. The FEIS is also available on CD-ROM and • Oregon Department of Environmental Quality 4 Sellwood Bridge Project Final Environmental Impact Statement Fact Sheet − Clean Water Act Section 401: Water − Harbor Master Permit Quality Certification FEIS Appendix F, Summary of Permits and − Clean Water Act Section 402: National Clearances Needed, summarizes required Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits and clearances for this project. (NPDES) Program − Clean Water Act Section 402: NPDES The Federal Highway Administration, in Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System cooperation with the Oregon Department of (MS4) Program Transportation and Multnomah County, intends − Conformance with Oregon Department to issue a “statute of limitations” (SOL) notice in the Federal Register, pursuant to 23 United of Environmental Quality’s National States Code (U.S.C.) Section 139(l), indicating Ambient Air Quality Standards that one or more federal agencies have taken final • Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife action on permits, licenses, or approvals for this − Oregon Endangered Species Act transportation project. This SOL notice (Wildlife) establishes that claims seeking judicial review of − Fish Passage Plan Approval (Oregon those federal agency actions will be barred unless Administrative Rule [OAR] 635-012) such claims are filed within 180 days after the date of publication of the notice in the Federal • Oregon Department of Transportation Register. Multnomah County will also make the − Access spacing deviation (OAR 734-051) SOL notice available on the project website at • Oregon State Marine Board http://www.sellwoodbridge.org. − Recreational Waters Coordination Requirements Authors and Principal • State Historic Preservation Office Contributors − Section 106 Consultation, National The names of authors and principal contributors Historic Preservation Act are listed in FEIS Appendix C, List of Preparers. Local Record of Decision • City of Portland Following issuance of the FEIS, the Federal − Floodplain Development Permit Highway Administration will issue a Record of − Type II Greenway Permit Decision. This approval, and a Financial Plan − Type II Environmental Permit demonstrating how the project will be funded, − Type II Historic Design Review would allow Multnomah County to move ahead − Conditional Use Permit with the project. − Non Park Use Permit − Noise Ordinance Variance In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, alternative formats of this document will be made available upon request. Sellwood Bridge Project Final Environmental Impact Statement 5 Final Environmental Impact Statement Table of Contents Summary .................................................................................................... S-1 Chapter 1. Purpose and Need ................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Why are we considering the Sellwood Bridge project? ........................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Where is the project located? ..................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 What is the project setting? ......................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 What is the history of the project? ............................................................................................................ 1-2 1.4.1 Built in 1925 ...................................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4.2 Oregon’s First-Ever Four-Span, Continuous-truss Bridge
Recommended publications
  • Sellwood Bridge May 8, 2018 Project Overview Project Overview
    SELLWOOD BRIDGE MAY 8, 2018 PROJECT OVERVIEW PROJECT OVERVIEW • Procurement: CMGC • Owner: Multnomah County • Location: Portland, Oregon • Contract Value: $227,000,000 • Construction Timeline: • Started: December 2011 • Completed: January 2017 PROJECT TEAM • Agencies • Multnomah County • City of Portland • Oregon Department of Transportation • Federal Highway Administration • Designers/Consultants • T. Y. Lin International • CH2M Hill • David Evans and Associates • General Contractor • Slayden/Sundt Joint Venture HISTORY • Originally a Ferry Crossing • Original Sellwood Bridge - Opened 1925 • In depth inspections - mid 1980’s & 2003 • Further “Band aids” were installed • Loads Restrictions enforced in 2004 • In-depth inspection/evaluation 2005 • Structural rating - 2 out of 100 Local RR OR 43 to Tracks Portland Cemetery Willamette River Sellwood Landslide Riverpark and Sellwood Harbor OR 43 to Condos Lake Oswego CMGC PROCUREMENT CMGC CONSTRUCTION MANAGER/GENERAL CONTRACTOR • Collaboration between Owner, Designer, and Contractor • Up to Date Market Pricing • Design development Owner • Constructability Reviews • Value Engineering • ROW/TCE acquisition & Phasing • Schedule Development • Risk Management A/E Collaboration GC • Other Owner Drivers: • Sustainability • Public involvement • Minority Goals PRECONSTRUCTION • 7 Amendments (Design Packages) • Able to release packages early to start work • Shoofly • Landslide • Condo Demo/Reconstruct • Main Bridge - GMP • 60%, 90%, and 100% cost estimates • After each pricing exercise adjustments are made to validate the design aligns with the owners budget • Design Modifications • Value Engineering • Material Selections • Means and Methods Evaluated CONTRACTING PLAN • DMWESB Goal - 20% • Created a Contracting Plan with the Owner: • 4 Categories • Project Final DMWESB: • 20.41% • $45,491,206 SMALL GC PACKAGES • 4 scopes of work separated into GC-type packages • Subcontractor solicitation, best value scoring, and scope management for the entire scope.
    [Show full text]
  • A Report on the 2003 Parks Levy Investment Objective 1: Restore
    A Report on the 2003 Parks Levy Investment In November 2002, Portland voters approved a five-year Parks Levy to begin in July 2003. Levy dollars restored budget cuts made in FY 2002-03 as well as major services and improvements outlined in the Parks 2020 Vision plan adopted by City Council in July 2001. In order to fulfill our obligation to the voters, we identified four key objectives. This report highlights what we have accomplished to date. Objective 1: Restore $2.2 million in cuts made in 2002/03 budget The 2003 Parks Levy restored cuts that were made to balance the FY 2002-03 General Fund budget. These cuts included the closure of some recreational facilities, the discontinuation and reduction of some community partnerships that provide recreational opportunities for youth, and reductions in maintenance of parks and facilities. Below is a detailed list of services restored through levy dollars. A. Restore programming at six community schools. SUN Community Schools support healthy social and cross-cultural development of all participants, teach and model values of respect and inclusion of all people, and help reduce social disparities and inequities. Currently, over 50% of students enrolled in the program are children of color. 2003/04 projects/services 2004/05 projects/services Proposed projects/services 2005/06 Hired and trained full-time Site Coordinators Total attendance at new sites (Summer Continue to develop programming to serve for 6 new PP&R SUN Community Schools: 2004-Spring 2005): 85,159 the needs of each school’s community and Arleta, Beaumont, Centennial, Clarendon, increase participation in these programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Trail Running in the Portland Area
    TRAIL RUNNING IN THE PORTLAND AREA Banks-Vernonia State Trail Activity: Trail Running Buxton, OR Trail Distance: 4 miles A wide gravel multi-use trail that travels through a second-growth Douglas fir forest. You’ll enjoy the smooth graded surface on this 20-mile multi-use trail that travels through a serene forest canopy. Clackamas River Activity: Trail Running Estacada, OR Trail Distance: 8 miles A classic river trail that traces the contours of the Clackamas River through pockets of old- growth western red cedar and Douglas fir. River views. Creek crossings. Bridge crossings. Glendover Fitness Trail Loop Activity: Trail Running Portland, OR Trail Distance: 2 miles Wood-chip trail (with a short paved section) that circles Glendoveer Golf Course in northeast Portland. This sophisticated wood- chip trail circles the smooth greens of Glendoveer Golf Course in northe... Hagg Lake Loop Activity: Trail Running Forest Grove, OR Trail Distance: 15.1 miles Combination of singletrack trail, paved paths, and roads that take you around scenic Hagg Lake in Scoggins Valley Regional Park in Washington County. Bridge crossings. This sinewy trail offers plenty ... Leif Erikson Drive Activity: Trail Running Portland, OR Trail Distance: 12 miles Nonmotorized multi-use gravel-dirt road with distance markers that winds through 5,000- acre Forest Park in Portland. Occasional views. This civilized multi-use trail is an easy cruise on a multi-use g... Leif Erikson Drive - Wildwood Loop Activity: Trail Running Portland, OR Trail Distance: 7.9 miles The route travels on singletrack trails and a doubletrack gravel road through the scenic treed setting of Forest Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Sellwood Bridge Health Impact Assessment
    The Sellwood Bridge Project: A Health Impact Assessment Prepared by: Maya Bhat, Research Analyst Elizabeth Clapp , Research Analyst Health Assessment & Evaluation Office of Health & Social Justice January 21, 2011 Lillian Shirley, Director, Multnomah County Health Department Sandy Johnson, Director, Health & Social Justice For information please contact: Maya Bhat (503) 988-3663 ext. 29055 [email protected] Contents List of figures and table......................................................................................................... ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 1 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 3 2 PURPOSE ........................................................................................................................... 3 3 SCOPE OF THIS HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT ................................................................ 3 4 PROJECT BACKGROUND 4.1 Existing conditions on the bridge ......................................................................................... 3 4.2 Locally preferred bridge design .................................................................................................... 4 5 ANALYSIS OF HEALTH IMPACTS OF THE REPLACEMENT BRIDGE 5.1 Improve bicyclist and pedestrian safety .............................................................................. 7 5.1.a Concerns about bike and pedestrian
    [Show full text]
  • Multnomah County Willamette River Bridges Capital Improvement Plan (2015-2034) FINAL
    Multnomah County Willamette River Bridges Capital Improvement Plan (2015-2034) FINAL Prepared for: Multnomah County Department of Community Services Bridge Division 1403 SE Water Ave. Portland, OR 97214 503 988-3757 www.multco.us/bridges Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Results .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Prioritization Process for Bridge CIP Projects .......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Bridge CIP Project Costs ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 3 Bridge CIP Development Process Summary ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Existing Information Review ...................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ross Island Bridge Rehabilitation Project Frequently Asked Questions
    Ross Island Bridge Rehabilitation Project Frequently Asked Questions What does the project involve? Starting in October 2014, contractors will remove about 250 deteriorating rivets and upgrade the steels members. This first phase will take six to eight weeks to complete. In the spring of 2015, crews will begin preparations to paint the bridge. This involves stripping old paint down to the bare steel, treating the bare steel for rust and then applying the new paint. Why paint the Ross Island Bridge? The paint on the U.S. 26 Willamette River Bridge (Ross Island Bridge) has deteriorated and no longer provides the necessary corrosion protection and aesthetic appearance. The bridge was last painted in 1967. This work will preserve its structural integrity and help extend its useful life. Why do the rivets need to be removed? Many of the rivets haven’t been replaced since the bridge opened in 1926 and are being removed because of rust and corrosion. Removing and replacing the rivets will help strengthen the bridge, preserve its structural stability and extend its service life. What’s the schedule? Rivet removal will take place in the fall of 2014 and will require six to eight weeks to complete. The painting will take place in the dry season, spring to fall, in 2015, 2016 and 2017. The project is scheduled for completion in late 2017, although the schedule is subject to change due to weather and site conditions. What are the work hours? The rivet work will occur during the day between 7 a.m. and 6 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Landfill Legacy
    Our landfi ll legacy Metro-area landfi lls closed since 1960 and their impact on the region’s urban and natural environment March 2004 Above – The undulating sur- face of a hotel parking lot in north Portland is evidence of an unstable landfi ll beneath Metro Report the pavement. Left – Oaks Bottom Wildlife Refuge shows signs of possible seepage from a 1970’s landfi ll. Metro People places • open spaces Clean air and clean water do not stop at city limits or county lines. Neither does the need for jobs, a thriving economy and good trans por ta tion choices for people and businesses in our region. Voters have asked Metro to help with the challenges that cross those lines and affect the 24 cities and three counties in the Portland metropolitan area. A regional approach simply makes sense when it comes to protecting open space, caring for parks, plan ning for the best use of land, man ag ing garbage dis pos al and increasing recycling. Metro oversees world-class facilities such as the Oregon Zoo, which con trib utes to con ser va tion and education, and the Oregon Convention Center, which benefi ts the region’s economy. Your Metro representatives Metro Council President – David Bragdon Metro Councilors – Rod Park, District 1; Brian Newman, deputy council president, District 2; Carl Hosticka, District 3; Susan McLain, District 4; Rex Burkholder, District 5; Rod Monroe, District 6. Auditor – Alexis Dow, CPA Web site: www.metro-region.org I-5 W ASH IN GTO N ORE I-205 G ON MULTNOMAH CO.
    [Show full text]
  • Sellwood Community Center Business Plan
    Sellwood Community Center Business Plan Fiscal Year 2011-12 Sellwood Community Center Business Plan Fiscal Year 2011-12 Published April 2011 Project Staff Pauline Miranda, Corporate Strategy Kim Calame, Sellwood Community Center Recreation Supervisor Patty Gaines, Recreation Coordinator I Review Team Eileen Argentina, PP&R Services Manager Jeff Milkes, South Zone Manager Randy Webster, Corporate Strategy Manager Portland Parks & Recreation 1120 SW 5th Ave, Suite 1302 Portland, Oregon 97204 (503) 823-PLAY Nick Fish, Commissioner www.PortlandParks.org Zari Santner, Director Table of Contents Introduction..............................................................................................................................................1 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................3 Business Profile Vision..................................................................................................................................................5 Mission................................................................................................................................................5 Origin and History.............................................................................................................................5 Sustainability ......................................................................................................................................6 Location and Hours ...........................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • The Portland Planning Commission
    Portland State University PDXScholar Portland Regional Planning History Oregon Sustainable Community Digital Library 1-1-1979 The orP tland Planning Commission: An Historical Overview Laura Campos Portland (Or.). Bureau of Planning Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/oscdl_planning Part of the Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Recommended Citation Campos, Laura and Portland (Or.). Bureau of Planning, "The orP tland Planning Commission: An Historical Overview" (1979). Portland Regional Planning History. Paper 15. http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/oscdl_planning/15 This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Portland Regional Planning History by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Portland Planning Commission an Historical Overview CITY OF PORTLAND <S© BUREAU OF PLANNING The Portland Planning Commission an Historical Overview The Portland Planning Commission an Historical Overview BY LAURA CAMPOS HOLLY JOHNSON, Editor PATRICIA ZAHLER, Graphic Design BART JONES, typist HELEN MIRENDA, typist produced by: City of Portland, Bureau of Planning December, 1979 This booklet gives an historical overview of the City of Portland's Planning Commission. It was designed to present summary information and a complete list of Commission reports for new Commissioners and staff of the Cityfs Bureau of Planning. The project
    [Show full text]
  • Family -Friendly Spots to Live, Play And
    Vote for your favorites! PDX Parent Picks 2021 for the long days and short years theCity Guide FamiFamilyly- friendly spotspotss to live, play and eat PDXPARENT.COM PORTLAND | VANCOUVERpdxparent.com | JANUARY | January 2021 1 pdxparent.com | January 2021 3 4 January 2021 | pdxparent.com contents ERIN J. BERNARD BONCHRON DENISE CASTAÑON NATALIE GILDERSLEEVE PORTLAND PARKS AND RECREATION PDX Parent’s City Guide Take a deep dive into family-friendly neighborhoods across the quadrants and beyond. Find family-tested places to eat and play; housing costs; transit, walk and bike scores; and much more. North: BONUS STORIES RESOURCES St. Johns neighborhood ..........................................................8 Editor’s Note ..........................................................................6 City Guide Listings Northeast: A helpful directory to find Friendly Neighborhoods King neighborhood .......................................................................12 for LGBTQ+ Families ....................................................9 everything your family needs — from dentists to dance Southeast: Supporting Local Black-owned .......................................................................10 Sellwood-Moreland neighborhood ............................16 classes. Businesses .............................................................................13 School Open Houses ............................... 31 Southwest: GreatSchools.org: .................................................20 Maplewood neighborhood Ratings Aren’t the
    [Show full text]
  • November 3, 2005
    Reference for CTF Sellwood in the News Blogs County release third Sellwood Bridge survey August 15th, 2007 - Jonathan Maus (Editor), BikePortland.org http://bikeportland.org/2007/08/15/county-releases-third-sellwood-bridge-survey/ A closer look at bikes and the Sellwood Bridge project August 15th, 2007 - Jonathan Maus (Editor), BikePortland.org http://bikeportland.org/2007/08/15/a-closer-look-at-bikes-and-the-sellwood-bridge-project/ Neighborhood Petition August 2007, ongoing -VoteForTeal.com http://www.voteforteal.com/ News Articles To view all articles about the project, go to www.sellwoodbridge.org/NewsRoom.aspx Sellwood Bridge will close Sunday during an inspection September 4, 2007 - Patrick O'Neill, The Oregonian http://blog.oregonlive.com/breakingnews/2007/09/sellwood_bridge_will_close_sun.html Infrastructure Gridlock August 10, 2007 - Randal O'Toole, The American Spectator http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=11855 Daily bridge commute has an ominous side August 9, 2007 - Dan Itel, The Lake Oswego Review http://www.lakeoswegoreview.com/opinion/story.php?story_id=118661464739486300 Don’t wait for a crisis August 7, 2007 - The Gresham Outlook http://www.theoutlookonline.com/opinion/story.php?story_id=118655100511386000 REFERENCE FOR CTF 1 9/11/2007 SELLWOOD IN THE NEWS Oregon bridges ok, but we’re uneasy August 5, 2007 - The Corvallis Gazette-Times http://www.gazettetimes.com/articles/2007/08/06/news/opinion/0di01_bridge0806.txt Sellwood: A bridge too far gone? August 5, 2007 - James Mayer and Andy Dworkin, The Oregonian
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Constrained Project List Projects Are Listed Alphabetically by County and Nominating Agency
    2018 Regional Transportation Plan Constrained Project List - Public Review Draft Draft Constrained Project List Projects are listed alphabetically by County and nominating agency. Included in Financially Nominating 2018 RTP Estimated Cost Constrained RTP Investment County Agency Primary Facility Owner Time Period ID Project Name Start location End location Description (2016 dollars) project list Category Primary Purpose Clackamas County Clackamas County Clackamas County 2018-2027 11774 Johnson Creek Blvd and Bell Ave Johnson Creek NA Improve intersection of Johnson Creek Blvd and $ 1,500,000 Yes Active Reduce fatal and Intersection Safety Improvements Blvd/Bell Ave Bell Ave to improve intersection safety by Transportation severe injury crashes (TSAP) intersection implementing proven safety counter measures for bicyclist and pedestrians as identified in county Transportation Safety Action Plan and improve ADA accessibility. No change in intersection capacity. Clackamas County Clackamas County ODOT 2018-2027 10018 82nd Ave. Bike and Ped Safety Monterey Ave. Sunnybrook Blvd. Improve safety for bike and pedestrian system $ 1,745,000 Yes Active Reduce fatal and Improvements by completing gaps and implementing proven Transportation severe injury crashes safety counter measures at identified locations within the corridor. Improve ADA accessibility. Clackamas County Clackamas County ODOT 2018-2027 10024 McLoughlin Blvd. Improvement Milwaukie Gladstone Improve safety for bicyclist and pedestrians by $ 7,685,000 Yes Active Reduce fatal and adding bikeways, pedestrian facilities, fill Transportation severe injury crashes sidewalk gaps, add transit supportive elements, improve ADA accessibility, and implementing proven safety counter measures. Clackamas County Clackamas County NCPRD 2018-2027 10085 Lake Oswego Oak Grove Bike Ped Willamette Shoreline Trolley Trail Improve safety and mobility for bicyclists and $ 21,536,380 Yes Active Increase travel Bridge Over the Willamette River pedestrians by constructing a bike/pedestrian Transportation options/alt.
    [Show full text]