Galaxy Formation, Reionization, the First Stars and Quasars

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Galaxy Formation, Reionization, the First Stars and Quasars Ay 127 Galaxy Formation, Reionization, the First Stars and Quasars Coral Wheeler Galaxy Formation • The early stages of galaxy evolution — no clear-cut boundary — has two principal aspects: assembly of the mass, and conversion of gas into stars ! • Related to large-scale (hierarchical) structure formation, but very messy process, much more complicated than LSS formation and growth ! • Probably closely related to the formation of the massive central black holes as well ! • Star formation peaks in massive galaxies at z ~ 3, lower mass peak later. Cosmic SFR peaks near z ~2 ! • Observations have found thousands of galaxy candidates at z > 6, with spectroscopically confirmed galaxies out to nearly z = 9 ! • The frontier is now at z ~ 6 - 10, the so-called Era of Reionization (EoR) A General Outline • The smallest scale density fluctuations keep collapsing, with baryons falling into the potential wells dominated by the dark matter, achieving high densities through cooling – This process starts right after the recombination at z ~ 1100 ! • Once the gas densities are high enough, star formation ignites – This probably happens around z ~ 20 – By z ~ 6, UV radiation from young galaxies reionizes the universe ! • These protogalactic fragments keep merging, forming larger objects in a hierarchical fashion ever since then ! • Star formation enriches the gas, and some of it is expelled in the intergalactic medium, while more gas keeps falling in – SNe feedback can dramatically affect dwarf galaxy morphology and star formation ! • If a central massive black hole forms, the energy release from accretion can also create a considerable feedback on the young host galaxy An Outline of the Early Cosmic History (illustration from Avi Loeb) ! ! ! ! Recombination: Dark Ages: Reionization Era: Galaxy Release of the CMBR Collapse of Density The Cosmic evolution Fluctuations Renaissance begins Toy model of galaxy formation 1. Primordial abundance gas (hydrogen + helium) is dragged from into potential wells set by dark matter 2. The gas shocks and is heated to the halo virial temperature. The shock expands and fills the dark matter halo with hot gas that roughly traces the dark matter potential. 3. The hot gas is supported by pressure in quasi-static equilibrium, and cools radiatively. The cold gas falls in to form a disk. Classical Galaxy Formation Picture If the gas cools and contracts without angular momentum loss to form a thin, angular momentum supported exponential disc, the disc scale radius is given by Mo, Mao & White (1998): Rhalo = min(Rcool, Rvir) Simulated CDM haloes typically have The function f (∼1) in equation (2) contains information on the halo profile shape and contraction from baryonic infall, and depends on the initial halo concentration c ≡ Rhalo/Rs and the disc mass, md, in units of the total mass within Rhalo. Physical Processes of Galaxy Formation Galaxy formation is actually a much messier problem than structure formation. Must also include: ! • The evolution of the resulting stellar population • Feedback processes generated by the ejection of mass and energy from evolving stars • Production and mixing of heavy elements (chemical evolution) • Effects of dust obscuration • Formation of black holes at galaxy centers and effects of AGN emission, jets, etc. • … etc., etc., etc. • Also, may not be the same for all galaxy masses! Hydrostatic Force Balance For a gas in hydrostatic equilibrium, the gas profile, ρg(r), will be set by a competition between the isothermal gas pressure, , and the gravitational potential. If we assume that the gravitational force is dominated by the NFW halo potential, the hydrostatic force balance equation yields a pressure-support radius Pressure support radius Angular momentum support radius Kaufmann, Wheeler & Bullock 2007 Oñorbe et al. 2015 The Evolving Dark Halo Mass Function (Press-Schechter) Perturbations on all scales imprinted on the universe by quantum fluctuations during an inflationary era. Later, as radiation redshifts away, become mass perturbations, grow linearly. From small to large mass scales, perturbations collapse to z = 0 form galaxies/clusters 5 10 20 z = 30 Barkana & Loeb The Evolving Dark Halo Mass Function (Press-Schechter) Perturbations on all scales imprinted on the universe by quantum fluctuations during Cosmological (CDM) an inflationary era. Later, as radiation redshifts away, become mass perturbations, grow linearly. From small to large mass scales, perturbations collapse to z = 0 form galaxies/clusters 5 10 20 z = 30 Barkana & Loeb Read & Trentham 2005 CDM simulations Galaxy luminosity fct Read & Trentham 2005 CDM simulations Galaxy luminosity fct Read & Trentham 2005 CDM simulations Galaxy luminosity fct Cooling & AGN Feedback (QSOs) Read & Trentham 2005 CDM simulations Galaxy luminosity fct SNe Feedback Cooling & AGN Feedback (QSOs) LCDM predicts 1000s of subhalos around the Milky Way Stadel et al. 2009 Currently ~30 known MW satellites Drlica-Wagner et al. 2015 Koposov 2015, Leavens 2015, Martin 2015, Kim 2015, Kim & Jerjen 2015b UFDs have ancient stellar pops 30 6 3 2 Redshift 0.5 0.15 Hercules 1 Leo IV Hercules CVn II UMa I Hercules Cumulative SFH Leo IV Boo I Brown et al. 2014 CVn II Com Ber (STMAG) UMa I Magnitude 814 Bootes I m Epoch of reionization Coma Beren Fraction of stars formed Fraction of stars -0.4 -0.3 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 02 m606-m814 (STMAG) Age (Gyr) Stopped forming stars ~10 Gyr ago Simulated UFDs have ancient stellar pops 5 3 2 Redshift 0.5 0.25 UFD Simulated UFDs 106 ) sun 105 Simulated (M * Classical Dwarfs M Centrals 104 Cumulative SFH Satellites 103 109 1010 12 10 8 6 4 2 Mhalo (Msun) Age (Gyr) Wheeler et al. 2015 Both satellites & centrals Simulated UFDs have ancient stellar pops Infall times 5 3 2 Redshift 0.5 0.25 UFD Simulated UFDs 106 ) sun 105 Simulated (M * Classical Dwarfs M Centrals 104 Cumulative SFH Satellites 103 109 1010 12 10 8 6 4 2 Mhalo (Msun) Age (Gyr) Wheeler et al. 2015 Quenching unrelated to infall, likely reionization SimulatedMocking UFD continues the to Universe form stars when no reionizing background present 1.0 105 ] 0.75 0.5 104 0.25 Cumulative Stellar Mass [M 3 Cumulative Star Formation History Normal Reionization 10 Normal Reionization No Reionization No Reionization 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 Time [Gyr] Time [Gyr] Elbert et al. in prep Garrison-Kimmel et al. 2014 Lyman Alpha Forest Gunn & Peterson, 1965 QSO Observations Suggest the End of the Reionization at z ~ 6 Songaila (2004) Evolution of transmitted flux from observations of 50 high signal-to-noise quasars (2 < z < 6.3) Strong evolution of Lyα absorption at z > 5 • Transmitted flux quickly approaches zero at z > 5.5 • Complete absorption troughs begin to appear at z > 6 • Gunn-Peterson optical depths >> 1, indicating a rapid increase in the neutral fraction QSO Observations Suggest the End of the Reionization at z ~ 6 Ionized Neutral Songaila (2004) Evolution of transmitted flux from observations of 50 high signal-to-noise quasars (2 < z < 6.3) Strong evolution of Lyα absorption at z > 5 • Transmitted flux quickly approaches zero at z > 5.5 • Complete absorption troughs begin to appear at z > 6 • Gunn-Peterson optical depths >> 1, indicating a rapid increase in the neutral fraction Reionization Tricky process to determine! Depends on a number of poorly understood parameters: ! • Abundance and spectral shapes of early galaxies • Fraction of ionizing photons produced that are able to escape galactic environment contribute to reionization, fesc • IGM gas density distribution ! fesc in local Universe extremely low, but may increase at higher redshift High resolution simulations show fesc = 0.01 - 0.20, with possible boosts if one considers older stellar populations and binaries Substantial Diversity of IGM Absorption Seen IGM transmission over same redshift window along 4 different QSO lines of sight A Considerable Cosmic Variance Exists in the transmission of the Lyα forest at z > 5 Also possibly due to “patchy” reionization Cube = 200 million light-years Time = first billion years of the universe Blue = heated & ionized regions around galaxies Visualization credit: Marcelo Alvarez, Ralf Kaehler (Stanford), Tom Abel When did reionization start? Use the CMB: • Light from the CMB is Thompson scattered by free electrons, polarizing the signal • Estimate the column density via this polarization • Planck measured the scattering optical depth, found best “instantaneous reionization” model at z ~ 8 CMB Constraints on Reionization Planck Collaboration 2016: τ = 0.058 ± 0.012 for instantaneous reionization model, z = 8.2 ± 1.1 favored Upper limit to the width of reionization period: ∆z < 2.8 Data points from QSOs, Ly-alpha emitters and Ly- alpha absorbers Looking Even Deeper: The 21cm Line We can in principle image HI condensations in the still neutral, pre-reionization universe using the 21cm line. Several experiments are now being constructed or planned to do this, e.g., the Mileura Wide-Field Array in Australia, or the Square Kilometer Array (SKA) (Simulations of z = 8.5 H I, from P. Madau) Reionization Simulations Pawlik et al. 2016 fesc ~ 0.6 fesc ~ 0.3 Escape fraction and SNe feedback efficiency tuned to match cosmic SFH Simulation with the most realistic escape fraction matches observations best Reionization in Simulations Sims using common models for reionization backgrounds did not reproduce heating claimed by those same models!!! This has important considerations for many aspects of galaxy formation, such as the minimum halo mass that can form a galaxy Onorbe et al. 2016 What Reionized the Universe? • First stars in minihalos? - initially thought to start reionization, now likely form too early • First galaxies? - How low mass are needed? What happens to the L-fct at high redshift? What happens to those galaxies today? • Active Galactic Nuclei / QSOs? - Are there enough at high z? Minihalos First stars expected to form in dark matter (DM) minihalos of typical mass ∼ 106 M⊙ at redshifts z ∼ 20.
Recommended publications
  • Report from the Dark Energy Task Force (DETF)
    Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Fermilab Particle Astrophysics Center P.O.Box 500 - MS209 Batavia, Il l i noi s • 60510 June 6, 2006 Dr. Garth Illingworth Chair, Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee Dr. Mel Shochet Chair, High Energy Physics Advisory Panel Dear Garth, Dear Mel, I am pleased to transmit to you the report of the Dark Energy Task Force. The report is a comprehensive study of the dark energy issue, perhaps the most compelling of all outstanding problems in physical science. In the Report, we outline the crucial need for a vigorous program to explore dark energy as fully as possible since it challenges our understanding of fundamental physical laws and the nature of the cosmos. We recommend that program elements include 1. Prompt critical evaluation of the benefits, costs, and risks of proposed long-term projects. 2. Commitment to a program combining observational techniques from one or more of these projects that will lead to a dramatic improvement in our understanding of dark energy. (A quantitative measure for that improvement is presented in the report.) 3. Immediately expanded support for long-term projects judged to be the most promising components of the long-term program. 4. Expanded support for ancillary measurements required for the long-term program and for projects that will improve our understanding and reduction of the dominant systematic measurement errors. 5. An immediate start for nearer term projects designed to advance our knowledge of dark energy and to develop the observational and analytical techniques that will be needed for the long-term program. Sincerely yours, on behalf of the Dark Energy Task Force, Edward Kolb Director, Particle Astrophysics Center Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Professor of Astronomy and Astrophysics The University of Chicago REPORT OF THE DARK ENERGY TASK FORCE Dark energy appears to be the dominant component of the physical Universe, yet there is no persuasive theoretical explanation for its existence or magnitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Fine-Tuning, Complexity, and Life in the Multiverse*
    Fine-Tuning, Complexity, and Life in the Multiverse* Mario Livio Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA E-mail: [email protected] and Martin J. Rees Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The physical processes that determine the properties of our everyday world, and of the wider cosmos, are determined by some key numbers: the ‘constants’ of micro-physics and the parameters that describe the expanding universe in which we have emerged. We identify various steps in the emergence of stars, planets and life that are dependent on these fundamental numbers, and explore how these steps might have been changed — or completely prevented — if the numbers were different. We then outline some cosmological models where physical reality is vastly more extensive than the ‘universe’ that astronomers observe (perhaps even involving many ‘big bangs’) — which could perhaps encompass domains governed by different physics. Although the concept of a multiverse is still speculative, we argue that attempts to determine whether it exists constitute a genuinely scientific endeavor. If we indeed inhabit a multiverse, then we may have to accept that there can be no explanation other than anthropic reasoning for some features our world. _______________________ *Chapter for the book Consolidation of Fine Tuning 1 Introduction At their fundamental level, phenomena in our universe can be described by certain laws—the so-called “laws of nature” — and by the values of some three dozen parameters (e.g., [1]). Those parameters specify such physical quantities as the coupling constants of the weak and strong interactions in the Standard Model of particle physics, and the dark energy density, the baryon mass per photon, and the spatial curvature in cosmology.
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmology Slides
    Inhomogeneous cosmologies George Ellis, University of Cape Town 27th Texas Symposium on Relativistic Astrophyiscs Dallas, Texas Thursday 12th December 9h00-9h45 • The universe is inhomogeneous on all scales except the largest • This conclusion has often been resisted by theorists who have said it could not be so (e.g. walls and large scale motions) • Most of the universe is almost empty space, punctuated by very small very high density objects (e.g. solar system) • Very non-linear: / = 1030 in this room. Models in cosmology • Static: Einstein (1917), de Sitter (1917) • Spatially homogeneous and isotropic, evolving: - Friedmann (1922), Lemaitre (1927), Robertson-Walker, Tolman, Guth • Spatially homogeneous anisotropic (Bianchi/ Kantowski-Sachs) models: - Gödel, Schücking, Thorne, Misner, Collins and Hawking,Wainwright, … • Perturbed FLRW: Lifschitz, Hawking, Sachs and Wolfe, Peebles, Bardeen, Ellis and Bruni: structure formation (linear), CMB anisotropies, lensing Spherically symmetric inhomogeneous: • LTB: Lemaître, Tolman, Bondi, Silk, Krasinski, Celerier , Bolejko,…, • Szekeres (no symmetries): Sussman, Hellaby, Ishak, … • Swiss cheese: Einstein and Strauss, Schücking, Kantowski, Dyer,… • Lindquist and Wheeler: Perreira, Clifton, … • Black holes: Schwarzschild, Kerr The key observational point is that we can only observe on the past light cone (Hoyle, Schücking, Sachs) See the diagrams of our past light cone by Mark Whittle (Virginia) 5 Expand the spatial distances to see the causal structure: light cones at ±45o. Observable Geo Data Start of universe Particle Horizon (Rindler) Spacelike singularity (Penrose). 6 The cosmological principle The CP is the foundational assumption that the Universe obeys a cosmological law: It is necessarily spatially homogeneous and isotropic (Milne 1935, Bondi 1960) Thus a priori: geometry is Robertson-Walker Weaker form: the Copernican Principle: We do not live in a special place (Weinberg 1973).
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1707.01004V1 [Astro-Ph.CO] 4 Jul 2017
    July 5, 2017 0:15 WSPC/INSTRUCTION FILE coc2ijmpe International Journal of Modern Physics E c World Scientific Publishing Company Primordial Nucleosynthesis Alain Coc Centre de Sciences Nucl´eaires et de Sciences de la Mati`ere (CSNSM), CNRS/IN2P3, Univ. Paris-Sud, Universit´eParis–Saclay, Bˆatiment 104, F–91405 Orsay Campus, France [email protected] Elisabeth Vangioni Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, UMR-7095 du CNRS, Universit´ePierre et Marie Curie, 98 bis bd Arago, 75014 Paris (France), Sorbonne Universit´es, Institut Lagrange de Paris, 98 bis bd Arago, 75014 Paris (France) [email protected] Received July 5, 2017 Revised Day Month Year Primordial nucleosynthesis, or big bang nucleosynthesis (BBN), is one of the three evi- dences for the big bang model, together with the expansion of the universe and the Cos- mic Microwave Background. There is a good global agreement over a range of nine orders of magnitude between abundances of 4He, D, 3He and 7Li deduced from observations, and calculated in primordial nucleosynthesis. However, there remains a yet–unexplained discrepancy of a factor ≈3, between the calculated and observed lithium primordial abundances, that has not been reduced, neither by recent nuclear physics experiments, nor by new observations. The precision in deuterium observations in cosmological clouds has recently improved dramatically, so that nuclear cross sections involved in deuterium BBN need to be known with similar precision. We will shortly discuss nuclear aspects re- lated to BBN of Li and D, BBN with non-standard neutron sources, and finally, improved sensitivity studies using Monte Carlo that can be used in other sites of nucleosynthesis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reionization of Cosmic Hydrogen by the First Galaxies Abstract 1
    David Goodstein’s Cosmology Book The Reionization of Cosmic Hydrogen by the First Galaxies Abraham Loeb Department of Astronomy, Harvard University, 60 Garden St., Cambridge MA, 02138 Abstract Cosmology is by now a mature experimental science. We are privileged to live at a time when the story of genesis (how the Universe started and developed) can be critically explored by direct observations. Looking deep into the Universe through powerful telescopes, we can see images of the Universe when it was younger because of the finite time it takes light to travel to us from distant sources. Existing data sets include an image of the Universe when it was 0.4 million years old (in the form of the cosmic microwave background), as well as images of individual galaxies when the Universe was older than a billion years. But there is a serious challenge: in between these two epochs was a period when the Universe was dark, stars had not yet formed, and the cosmic microwave background no longer traced the distribution of matter. And this is precisely the most interesting period, when the primordial soup evolved into the rich zoo of objects we now see. The observers are moving ahead along several fronts. The first involves the construction of large infrared telescopes on the ground and in space, that will provide us with new photos of the first galaxies. Current plans include ground-based telescopes which are 24-42 meter in diameter, and NASA’s successor to the Hubble Space Telescope, called the James Webb Space Telescope. In addition, several observational groups around the globe are constructing radio arrays that will be capable of mapping the three-dimensional distribution of cosmic hydrogen in the infant Universe.
    [Show full text]
  • DARK AGES of the Universe the DARK AGES of the Universe Astronomers Are Trying to fill in the Blank Pages in Our Photo Album of the Infant Universe by Abraham Loeb
    THE DARK AGES of the Universe THE DARK AGES of the Universe Astronomers are trying to fill in the blank pages in our photo album of the infant universe By Abraham Loeb W hen I look up into the sky at night, I often wonder whether we humans are too preoccupied with ourselves. There is much more to the universe than meets the eye on earth. As an astrophysicist I have the privilege of being paid to think about it, and it puts things in perspective for me. There are things that I would otherwise be bothered by—my own death, for example. Everyone will die sometime, but when I see the universe as a whole, it gives me a sense of longevity. I do not care so much about myself as I would otherwise, because of the big picture. Cosmologists are addressing some of the fundamental questions that people attempted to resolve over the centuries through philosophical thinking, but we are doing so based on systematic observation and a quantitative methodology. Perhaps the greatest triumph of the past century has been a model of the uni- verse that is supported by a large body of data. The value of such a model to our society is sometimes underappreciated. When I open the daily newspaper as part of my morning routine, I often see lengthy de- scriptions of conflicts between people about borders, possessions or liberties. Today’s news is often forgotten a few days later. But when one opens ancient texts that have appealed to a broad audience over a longer period of time, such as the Bible, what does one often find in the opening chap- ter? A discussion of how the constituents of the universe—light, stars, life—were created.
    [Show full text]
  • Dermining the Photon Budget of Galaxies During Reionization with Numerical Simulations, and Studying the Impact of Dust Joseph Lewis
    Who reionized the Universe ? : dermining the photon budget of galaxies during reionization with numerical simulations, and studying the impact of dust Joseph Lewis To cite this version: Joseph Lewis. Who reionized the Universe ? : dermining the photon budget of galaxies during reioniza- tion with numerical simulations, and studying the impact of dust. Astrophysics [astro-ph]. Université de Strasbourg, 2020. English. NNT : 2020STRAE041. tel-03199136 HAL Id: tel-03199136 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-03199136 Submitted on 15 Apr 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG ÉCOLE DOCTORALE 182 UMR 7550, Observatoire astronomique de Strasbourg THÈSE présentée par : Joseph Lewis soutenue le : 25 septembre 2020 pour obtenir le grade de : Docteur de l’université de Strasbourg Discipline/ Spécialité : Astrophysique Qui a réionisé l’Univers ? Détermination par la simulation numérique du budget de photons des galaxies pendant l’époque de la Réionisation, et étude de l’impact des poussières THÈSE dirigée par : M. AUBERT Dominique Professeur des universités, Université de Strasbourg RAPPORTEURS : M. GONZALES Mathias Maître de conférences, Université de Paris M. LANGER Mathieu Professeur des universités, Université Paris-Saclay AUTRES MEMBRES DU JURY : M.
    [Show full text]
  • Determining the Redshift of Reionization from the Spectra Of
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by CERN Document Server Determining the Redshift of Reionization From the Sp ectra of High{Redshift Sources 1;2 1 Zoltan Haiman and Abraham Lo eb ABSTRACT The redshift at which the universe was reionized is currently unknown. We examine the optimal strategy for extracting this redshift, z , from the sp ectra of reion early sources. For a source lo cated at a redshift z beyond but close to reionization, s 32 (1 + z ) < (1 + z ) < (1 + z ), the Gunn{Peterson trough splits into disjoint reion s reion 27 Lyman , , and p ossibly higher Lyman series troughs, with some transmitted ux in b etween these troughs. We show that although the transmitted ux is suppressed considerably by the dense Ly forest after reionization, it is still detectable for suciently bright sources and can b e used to infer the reionization redshift. The Next Generation Space Telescop e will reach the sp ectroscopic sensitivity required for the detection of such sources. Subject headings: cosmology: theory { quasars: absorption lines { galaxies: formation {intergalactic medium { radiative transfer Submitted to The Astrophysical Journal, July 1998 1. Intro duction The standard Big Bang mo del predicts that the primeval plasma recombined and b ecame predominantly neutral as the universe co oled b elow a temp erature of several thousand degrees at 3 a redshift z 10 (Peebles 1968). Indeed, the recent detection of Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) anisotropies rules out a fully ionized intergalactic medium (IGM) beyond z 300 (Scott, Silk & White 1995). However, the lack of a Gunn{Peterson trough (GP, Gunn & Peterson 1965) in the sp ectra of high{redshift quasars (Schneider, Schmidt & Gunn 1991) and galaxies (Franx et < al.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure Formation in a CDM Universe
    Structure formation in a CDM Universe Thomas Quinn, University of Washington Greg Stinson, Charlotte Christensen, Alyson Brooks Ferah Munshi Fabio Governato, Andrew Pontzen, Chris Brook, James Wadsley Microwave Background Fluctuations Image courtesy NASA/WMAP Large Scale Clustering A well constrained cosmology ` Contents of the Universe Can it make one of these? Structure formation issues ● The substructure problem ● The angular momentum problem ● The cusp problem Light vs CDM structure Stars Gas Dark Matter The CDM Substructure Problem Moore et al 1998 Substructure down to 100 pc Stadel et al, 2009 Consequences for direct detection Afshordi etal 2010 Warm Dark Matter cold warm hot Constant Core Mass Strigari et al 2008 Light vs Mass Number density log(halo or galaxy mass) Simulations of Galaxy formation Guo e tal, 2010 Origin of Galaxy Spins ● Torques on the collapsing galaxy (Peebles, 1969; Ryden, 1988) λ ≡ L E1/2/GM5/2 ≈ 0.09 for galaxies Distribution of Halo Spins f(λ) Λ = LE1/2/GM5/2 Gardner, 2001 Angular momentum Problem Too few low-J baryons Van den Bosch 01 Bullock 01 Core/Cusps in Dwarfs Moore 1994 Warm DM doesn't help Moore et al 1999 Dwarf simulated to z=0 Stellar mass = 5e8 M sun` M = -16.8 i g - r = 0.53 V = 55 km/s rot R = 1 kpc d M /M = 2.5 HI * f = .3 f cosmic b b i band image Dwarf Light Profile Rotation Curve Resolution effects Low resolution: bad Low resolution star formation: worse Inner Profile Slopes vs Mass Governato, Zolotov etal 2012 Constant Core Masses Angular Momentum Outflows preferential remove low J baryons Simulation Results: Resolution and H2 Munshi, in prep.
    [Show full text]
  • The Optical Depth to Reionization As a Probe of Cosmological and Astrophysical Parameters Aparna Venkatesan University of San Francisco, [email protected]
    The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center Physics and Astronomy College of Arts and Sciences 2000 The Optical Depth to Reionization as a Probe of Cosmological and Astrophysical Parameters Aparna Venkatesan University of San Francisco, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.usfca.edu/phys Part of the Astrophysics and Astronomy Commons, and the Physics Commons Recommended Citation Aparna Venkatesan. The Optical Depth to Reionization as a Probe of Cosmological and Astrophysical Parameters. The Astrophysical Journal, 537:55-64, 2000 July 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/309033 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts and Sciences at USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in Physics and Astronomy by an authorized administrator of USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 537:55È64, 2000 July 1 ( 2000. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. THE OPTICAL DEPTH TO REIONIZATION AS A PROBE OF COSMOLOGICAL AND ASTROPHYSICAL PARAMETERS APARNA VENKATESAN Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 5640 South Ellis Avenue, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637; aparna=oddjob.uchicago.edu Received 1999 December 17; accepted 2000 February 8 ABSTRACT Current data of high-redshift absorption-line systems imply that hydrogen reionization occurred before redshifts of about 5. Previous works on reionization by the Ðrst stars or quasars have shown that such scenarios are described by a large number of cosmological and astrophysical parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • High Redshift Quasar Hunting with the Dark Energy Survey
    High Redshift Quasar Hunting with the Dark Energy Survey Quasars in the Epoch of Reionisation Sophie Reed Supervisors: Richard McMahon, Manda Banerji 1 Why? ★ Theories of black hole formation and evolution z = 6 - 15 z = 2 WORDS Epoch of peak of galaxy Reionization and quasar ★ Metal abundances in the early universe activity ★ Gas distribution and reionisationv z = 20 - 30 z = 6 - 8 Start of z = 1100 first stars Reionization matter-radiation “Population III” decoupling (CMB) 2 Quasar Spectrum at z ~ 6 Spectrum of a z = 5.86 quasar from Venemans et al 2007 Continuum break across rest frame Lyman-alpha (λrest = 121.6nm) gives distinctive colours 3 Quasar Spectrum at z ~ 6 480 nm 640 nm 780 nm 920 nm 990 nm 1252 nm 2147 nm 4 The Dark Energy Survey (DES) First Light September 2012 Very large area when completed: ~5000 deg2, currently have ~2000 deg2 Deep imaging: 10 σ limits for i and z are AB = 23.4 and AB = 23.2 Sophisticated camera, DECam Credit: DES Collaboration 5 DECam Mosaic of 62 2k by 4k CCDs (0.27” pixels) Multi waveband imaging: Visible (400 nm) to Near IR (1050 nm), g, r, i, z and Y bands covered Much more sensitive to red light than SDSS Credit: DES Collaboration 6 DES - SDSS Comparison SDSS was most sensitive to bluer light in the r band DES is most sensitive to redder light in the z band u g r i z Y 7 The VISTA Hemisphere Survey (VHS) Will cover 10,000 deg2 in the infrared when completed VHS-DES (J, H and K) overlaps DES and is deeper VHS-ATLAS (Y, J, H and K) is a shallower survey 8 Currently Known Objects Lots of quasars known
    [Show full text]
  • High Redshift Galaxies As Probes of the Epoch of Reionization
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2016 High Redshift Galaxies As Probes Of The Epoch Of Reionization Jessie Frances Taylor University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Astrophysics and Astronomy Commons, and the Physics Commons Recommended Citation Taylor, Jessie Frances, "High Redshift Galaxies As Probes Of The Epoch Of Reionization" (2016). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2603. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2603 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2603 For more information, please contact [email protected]. High Redshift Galaxies As Probes Of The Epoch Of Reionization Abstract Following the Big Bang, as the Universe cooled, hydrogen and helium recombined, forming neutral gas. Currently, this gas largely resides between galaxies in a highly diffuse state known as the intergalactic medium (IGM). Observations indicate that the IGM, fueled by early galaxies and/or accreting black holes, ``reionized'' early in cosmic history--the entire volume of the Universe refilling with ionized gas. This thesis analyzes and develops several ways to use observations of high redshift galaxies to probe this period, the Epoch of Reionization (EoR). We examine the redshift evolution of the Ly-alpha fraction, the percentage of Lyman-break selected galaxies (LBGs) that are Lyman-alpha emitting galaxies (LAEs). Observing a sharp drop in this fraction at z ~ 7, many early studies surmised the z ~ 7 IGM must be surprisingly neutral. We model the effect of patchy reionization on Ly-alpha fraction observations, concluding that sample variance reduces the neutral fraction required.
    [Show full text]