DOCSLIB.ORG

United States1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

United States1 Alabama Arkansas Army Army Anniston Army Depot Pine Bluff Arsenal Fort Rucker Redstone Arsenal Air Force U.S. Army Recruiting Command, 2nd Little Rock Air Force Base Medical Recruiting Battalion U.S. Army Recruiting Command, California Montgomery Battalion Army Air Force Camp Parks Maxwell Air Force Base and Gunter Fort Hunter Liggett Annex Fort Irwin Presidio of Monterey (DLI/FLC) Alaska U.S. Army Recruiting Command, Fresno Battalion Army U.S. Army Recruiting Command, Los Fort Greely Angeles Battalion Fort Wainwright U.S. Army Recruiting Command, Joint Base Elmendorf – Richardson JBER Sacramento Battalion U.S. Army Recruiting Command, Air Force Southern California Battalion Eielson Air Force Base Joint Base Elmendorf – Richardson JBER Marine Corps Camp Pendleton Arizona Marine Corps Logistics Base Barstow Marine Corps Recruit Depot San Diego Army Marine Corps Air Station Miramar Fort Huachuca Marine Corps Mountain Warfare U.S. Army Recruiting Command, Training Center (MWTC) Phoenix Battalion Twentynine Palms (MCAGCC) Yuma Proving Ground Navy Marine Corps Naval Air Facility El Centro Marine Corps Air Station Yuma Naval Air Station Lemoore Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake Air Force Naval Base Coronado Davis-Monthan Air Force Base Naval Base Point Loma Luke Air Force Base Naval Base San Diego Naval Base Ventura County – Point Mugu/Port Hueneme Clearinghouse for Military Family Readiness at Penn State http://schoolresources.militaryfamilies.psu.edu/ California (Continued) District of Columbia (Continued) Navy (Continued) Navy Naval Support Activity Monterey Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling Naval Support Activity Washington Air Force Beale Air Force Base Air Force Edwards Air Force Base Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling Los Angeles Air Force Base Pentagon – Air Force March Air Reserve Base Travis Air Force Base Florida Vandenberg Air Force Base Army Defense Logistics Agency U.S. Army Recruiting Command, Defense Distribution Depot San Joaquin Jacksonville Battalion U.S. Army Recruiting Command, Miami Colorado Battalion U.S. Army Recruiting Command, Tampa Army Battalion Fort Carson USSOUTHCOM/U.S. Army Garrison- U.S. Army Recruiting Command, Denver Miami Battalion Navy Air Force Naval Air Station Jacksonville Buckley Air Force Base Naval Air Station Key West Peterson Air Force Base Naval Air Station Pensacola Schriever Air Force Base Naval Air Station Whiting Field USAF Academy Naval Station Mayport Naval Support Activity Orlando Connecticut Naval Support Activity Panama City Navy Air Force Naval Submarine Base New London Eglin Air Force Base Hurlburt Field Delaware MacDill Air Force Base Patrick Air Force Base Air Force Tyndall Air Force Base Dover Air Force Base Georgia District of Columbia Army Army Fort Benning Pentagon – Army Fort Gordon Fort Stewart Hunter Army Airfield Clearinghouse for Military Family Readiness at Penn State http://schoolresources.militaryfamilies.psu.edu/ Georgia (Continued) Illinois (Continued) Army (Continued) Air Force U.S. Army Cadet Command 6th Brigade Scott Air Force Base U.S. Army Recruiting Command, Atlanta Battalion Indiana Marine Corps Army Marine Corps Logistics Base – Albany U.S. Army Recruiting Command, Chicago Battalion Navy U.S. Army Recruiting Command, Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay Indianapolis Battalion Air Force Kansas Moody Air Force Base Robins Air Force Base Army Fort Leavenworth Hawaii Fort Riley Army Air Force Shofield Barracks/Fort Shafter McConnell Air Force Base Marine Corps Kentucky MCB Hawaii Army Navy Fort Campbell Joint Base Pearl Harbor - Hickam Fort Knox U.S. Army Cadet Command 1st Brigade Air Force U.S. Army Cadet Command 7th Brigade Joint Base Pearl Harbor – Hickam U.S. Army Cadet Command Headquarters Idaho U.S. Army Recruiting Command, 3rd Medical Recruiting Battalion Air Force Mountain Home Air Force Base Louisiana Illinois Army Fort Polk Army U.S. Army Recruiting Command, Baton Rock Island Arsenal Rouge Battalion U.S. Army Cadet Command 3rd Brigade Navy Navy Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Naval Station Great Lakes New Orleans Clearinghouse for Military Family Readiness at Penn State http://schoolresources.militaryfamilies.psu.edu/ Louisiana (Continued) Massachusetts Air Force Army Barksdale Air Force Base Fort Devens Natick Soldier Systems Center (NSCC) Maine Air Force Army Hanscom Air Force Base U.S. Army Recruiting Command, New Westover Air Reserve Base England Battalion Michigan Navy Portsmouth Naval Shipyard Army U.S. Army Garrison-Detroit Arsenal Maryland U.S. Army Recruiting Command, Great Lakes Battalion Army Aberdeen Proving Ground Defense Logistics Agency Fort Detrick Hart-Dole-Inouye Federal Center Fort George G. Meade U.S. Army Recruiting Command, 1st Minnesota Medical Recruiting Battalion U.S. Army Recruiting Command, Army Baltimore Battalion U.S. Army Recruiting Command, Minneapolis Battalion Navy Fort George G. Meade – Navy Mississippi Joint Base Andres – Naval Air Facility Washington Navy Naval Air Station Patuxent River Naval Air Station Meridian Naval Support Activity Annapolis – U.S. Naval Construction Battalion Center Naval Academy Gulfport Naval Support Activity Bethesda Home Stennis Space Center of Walter Reed National Military Medical Center Air Force Naval Support Activity South Potomac Columbus Air Force Base (NSF Indian Head) Keesler Air Force Base Air Force Missouri Air National Guard (ANG) Joint Base Andrews-Naval Air Facility Army Washington Fort Leonard Wood U.S. Army Recruiting Command, Kansas City Battalion Clearinghouse for Military Family Readiness at Penn State http://schoolresources.militaryfamilies.psu.edu/ Missouri (Continued) New Jersey (Continued) Air Force Air Force Whiteman Air Force Base Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst Montana New Mexico Air Force Army Malmstrom Air Force Base U.S. Army Garrison White Sands Missile Range Nebraska Air Force Air Force Cannon Air Force Base Offutt Air Force Base Holloman Air Force Base Kirtland Air Force Base Nevada New York Army U.S. Army Recruiting Command, 6th Army Medical Recruiting Battalion Fort Drum Fort Hamilton Navy U.S. Army Recruiting Command, Albany Naval Air Station Fallon Battalion U.S. Army Recruiting Command, New Air Force York City Battalion Creech Air Force Base U.S. Army Recruiting Command, Nellis Air Force Base Syracuse Battalion United States Military Academy at West New Hampshire Point Air Force Navy Pease ANGB Naval Support Activity Saratoga Springs New Jersey North Carolina Army Army Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst Fort Bragg Picatinny Arsenal U.S. Army Cadet Command 4th Brigade U.S. Army Cadet Command 2nd Brigade U.S. Army Recruiting Command, U.S. Army Recruiting Command, Mid- Raleigh Battalion Atlantic Battalion Marine Corps Navy Camp Lejeune Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point Naval Weapons Station Earle Marine Corps Air Station New River Clearinghouse for Military Family Readiness at Penn State http://schoolresources.militaryfamilies.psu.edu/ North Carolina (Continued) Pennsylvania Air Force Army Pope Army Airfield Carlisle Barracks Seymour Johnson Air Force Base Tobyhanna Army Depot U.S. Army Recruiting Command, North Dakota Harrisburg Battalion Air Force Defense Logistics Agency Grand Forks Air Force Base Defense Logistics Agency at Minot Air Force Base Susquehanna Ohio Rhode Island Army Navy U.S. Army Recruiting Command, Naval Station Newport Cleveland Battalion U.S. Army Recruiting Command, South Carolina Columbus Battalion Army Air Force Fort Jackson Wright-Patterson Air Force Base U.S. Army Recruiting Command, Columbia Recruiting Battalion Defense Logistics Agency Defense Supply Center Columbus Marine Corps Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort Oklahoma Marine Corps Recruit Depot Parris Island Army Fort Sill Navy McAlester Army Ammunition Plant Joint Base Charleston U.S. Army Recruiting Command, Oklahoma City Battalion Air Force 169th Fighter Wing, McEntire Joint Air Force National Guard Base Altus Air Force Base Joint Base Charleston Tinker Air Force Base Shaw Air Force Base Vance Air Force Base South Dakota Oregon Air Force Army Ellsworth Air Force Base U.S. Army Recruiting Command, Portland Battalion Clearinghouse for Military Family Readiness at Penn State http://schoolresources.militaryfamilies.psu.edu/ Tennessee Utah Army Army U.S. Army Recruiting Command, Dugway Proving Ground Nashville Battalion U.S. Army Recruiting Command, Salt Lake City Battalion Navy Naval Support Activity Mid-South Air Force Hill Air Force Base Air Force Arnold Air Force Base Virginia Texas Army Fort Belvoir Army Fort Lee Fort Bliss Fort Myer (Joint Base Myer – Henderson Fort Hood Hall) Joint Base San Antonio (Lackland Joint Base Langley-Eustis Randolph, Sam Houston) Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek- Red River Army Depot Fort Story U.S. Army Cadet Command 5th Brigade U.S. Army Recruiting Command, U.S. Army Recruiting Command, 5th Richmond Recruiting Battalion Medical Recruiting Battalion U.S. Army Recruiting Command, Dallas Marine Corps Battalion Henderson Hall (Joint Base Myer – U.S. Army Recruiting Command, Henderson Hall) Houston Battalion MARFORCOM, Camp Allen and MCSF U.S. Army Recruiting Command, San Regiment Antonio Battalion Marine Corps Base Quantico Navy Navy Naval Air Station Corpus Christi Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek- Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Fort Story Fort Worth Naval Air Station Oceana Naval Air Station Kingsville Naval Air Station Oceana Dam Neck Annex Air Force Naval Station Norfolk Dyess Air Force Base Naval Support Activity Northwest Annex Goodfellow Air Force Base Naval Support Activity
Recommended publications
  • Defense - Military Base Realignments and Closures (1)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R

    Defense - Military Base Realignments and Closures (1)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R

    The original documents are located in Box 11, folder “Defense - Military Base Realignments and Closures (1)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 11 of The John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON October 31, 197 5 MEMORANDUM TO: JACK MARSH FROM: RUSS ROURKE I discussed the Ft. Dix situation with Rep. Ed Forsythe again. As you may know, I reviewed the matter with Marty Hoffman at noon yesterday, and with Col. Kenneth Bailey several days ago. Actually, I exchanged intelligence information with him. Hoffman and Bailey advised me that no firm decision has as yet been made with regard to the retention of the training function at Dix. On Novem­ ber 5, Marty Hotfman will receive a briefing by Army staff on pos­ sible "back fill'' organizations that may be available to go to Dix in the event the training function moves out.
  • A Valley Ruled by Giants; Looking Back 20 Years at Unit History

    A Valley Ruled by Giants; Looking Back 20 Years at Unit History

    A valley ruled by Giants; looking back 20 years at unit history http://www.dm.af.mil/news/story_print.asp?id=123138863 A valley ruled by Giants; looking back 20 years at unit history by Master Sgt. Ruby Zarzyczny 943rd Rescue Group Public Affairs 3/9/2009 - DAVIS-MONTHAN AIR FORCE BASE, Ariz. -- Twenty years ago at the 943 rd Rescue Group's reservists worked in the "Valley of the Giants." Here on the flight line, six Jolly Green Giant helicopters call-sign Pony resided on the flight line. There these giants, towered more than 18 feet tall, stretched 73 feet, and more than 15 feet wide awaited the call of the 71st Special Operations Squadron. When called, these Ponies, two CH-3Es and four HH-3Es helicopters, weighed more than 22,000 (max) pounds, equipped with hoist (HH-3Es) and two 50 cal machines guns, used two General Electric T58-GE5 turbo shaft engines to soar to altitudes of up to 21,000 feet to traverse terrain where angels feared to tread. Most of these helicopters were Vietnam Veterans many flying A 71st SOS HH-3E Jolly Green Giant helicopter hoists a reservist during a training mission in the Southern with the 20th Helicopter Squadron and the 21 Special Arizona desert in the late 1980s. (Courtesy photo) Operations Squadron in Southeast Asia supporting Operation Pony Express before entering the Air Force Reserve fleet. According to Senior MasterSgt. Henry Shaw, 943rd Maintenance Squadron, supporting this operation is how they got their call sign that is still used today with our HH-60 Pavehawk helicopters.
  • Joint Land Use Study

    Joint Land Use Study

    Fairbanks North Star Borough Joint Land Use Study United States Army, Fort Wainwright United States Air Force, Eielson Air Force Base Fairbanks North Star Borough, Planning Department July 2006 Produced by ASCG Incorporated of Alaska Fairbanks North Star Borough Joint Land Use Study Fairbanks Joint Land Use Study This study was prepared under contract with Fairbanks North Star Borough with financial support from the Office of Economic Adjustment, Department of Defense. The content reflects the views of Fairbanks North Star Borough and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Office of Economic Adjustment. Historical Hangar, Fort Wainwright Army Base Eielson Air Force Base i Fairbanks North Star Borough Joint Land Use Study Table of Contents 1.0 Study Purpose and Process................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction....................................................................................................................1 1.2 Study Objectives ............................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Planning Area................................................................................................................. 2 1.4 Participating Stakeholders.............................................................................................. 4 1.5 Public Participation........................................................................................................ 5 1.6 Issue Identification........................................................................................................
  • Information Regarding the Number of UK Personnel Stationed at Creech

    Information Regarding the Number of UK Personnel Stationed at Creech

    Air Command Secretariat Spitfire Block 1?e Headquarters Air Command Royal Air Force High Wycombe Ministry Buckinghamshire of Defence HP14 4UE Ref. 2020/04244 11 May 2020 Thank you for your email of 31 March 2020 asking for details of personnel stationed at Creech Air Force Base. You requested the following information. 1. The number of UK personnel stationed or otherwise present at Creech Air Force Base, Nevada, for each year between 2016-2020. If possible use the same census date for each year (e.g., 1 January), unless this would be overly-burdensome; 2. A breakdown of which squadron/wing/unit these forces are assigned to, with numbers per unit, again broken down by year; 3. The number of these forces which are considered 'embedded', and the units to which they are attached, again broken down by year; 4. A breakdown of the rank and role of UK personnel at Creech, again by unit and year. I am treating your correspondence as a request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA). We have now completed a search of our paper and electronic records for the information you requested and I can confirm that information within the scope of your request is held. The number of personnel stationed at Creech by unit is given in the table below: Unit 1 Jan 16 1 Jan 17 1 Jan 18 1 Jan 19 1 Jan 20 39 Sqn 69 74 101 102 105 Em bedded 1 3 1 1 1 Total 70 77 102 103 106 The number of personnel stationed at Creech is given by rank in the table below: Rank 1 Jan 16 1 Jan 17 1 Jan 18 1 Jan 19 1 Jan 20 (Including equivalents) Wg Cdr 1 1 2
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract: DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION

    U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract: DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION

    CALIFORNIA HISTORIC MILITARY BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES INVENTORY VOLUME II: THE HISTORY AND HISTORIC RESOURCES OF THE MILITARY IN CALIFORNIA, 1769-1989 by Stephen D. Mikesell Prepared for: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract: DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION Prepared by: JRP JRP HISTORICAL CONSULTING SERVICES Davis, California 95616 March 2000 California llistoric Military Buildings and Stnictures Inventory, Volume II CONTENTS CONTENTS ..................................................................................................................................... i FIGURES ....................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................. iv PREFACE .................................................................................................................................... viii 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1-1 2.0 COLONIAL ERA (1769-1846) .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Spanish-Mexican Era Buildings Owned by the Military ............................................... 2-8 2.2 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................
  • Linkages Study 2015

    Linkages Study 2015

    Florida’s Military Installations Linkages Study conducted by The Principi Group and The SPECTRUM Group Team for the Florida Defense Support Task Force February 10, 2015 Florida’s Military Installations Linkages Study Table of Contents Executive Summary…………………………………………………4 Introduction……………….…………………………………………10 Scope of Study………….…………………………………………..10 Methodology……….………………………………………………..11 Analysis…………………………………………………….………..13 Intrastate Linkages…..………………………………………….…14 Interstate Linkages…………………………………………….…..31 Conclusions………….………….…………………………………..54 Recommendations………………………..………………….…….56 Navy Installation Linkages…………………………………...…..58 Air Force Installation Linkages……..………………………...…67 Team Orlando/National Simulation Center Linkages………..83 Coast Guard Linkages…………………………………………….88 National Guard Linkages…………………………………..……102 2 Florida’s Military Installations Linkages Study List of Figures Figure 1. Florida’s Major Military Installations and Ranges………………………….14 Figure 2. Key Command and Control Linkages in Florida……………………………15 Figure 3. Key Command and Control Linkages in South Florida…...………………16 Figure 4. Key Command and Control Linkages in Northeast Florida………………16 Figure 5. Key Command and Control Linkages in Northwest Florida……………...17 Figure 6. Key Communication Support Linkages in Florida…………………………18 Figure 7. Key Communications Support Linkages in Northwest Florida………….18 Figure 8. Key Training Linkages in Florida……………………………………………...20 Figure 9. Key Training Linkages in South Florida……………………………………...20 Figure 10. Key Training Linkages
  • Luke Air Force Base : Arizona

    Luke Air Force Base : Arizona

    Military Asset List 2016 U.S. Air Force LUKE AIR FORCE BASE : ARIZONA Established in 1941, Luke Air Force Base’s namesake is World War I pilot and Phoenix native, 2nd Lt. Frank Luke Jr. He bears the distinction of being the first aviator to receive the Congressional Medal of Honor. In eight days of flying, Lieutenant Luke scored 18 victories (14 German air balloons and 4 airplanes). Luke AFB is home to the 56th Fighter Wing, which is the largest fighter wing in the world. It is the only active-duty Air Force F-16 Above: The Spad XIII is the oldest aircraft to be displayed at the Luke AFB Air Park. training wing and The French-built Spad XIII equipped 16 squadrons in World War I, including formally added the F-35 Lieutenant Luke's 27th Aero Squadron. training mission in May (U.S. Air Force photo, Senior Airman Darlene Seltmann) 2015. Since 1941, Luke Left: Brig. Gen. Scott Pleus, 56th Fighter AFB has graduated more Wing commander, lands the wing’s flagship F-35 at Luke after ferrying it from than 57,650 pilots. As of Lockheed Martin’s Fort Worth, Texas, June 2015, the wing has plant April 28, 2015. The arrival marked that jet’s first flight as a U.S. Air Force 113 aircraft, 23 operations and support squadrons, and hosts the aircraft. (U.S. Air Force photo, Senior Airman Devante Williams) 944th Fighter Wing, Navy Operational Support Center Phoenix and Marine Corps Reserves’ Bulk Fuel Company C. It’s also home to MISSION STATEMENT approximately 5,150 military and civilian Airmen.
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories

    United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories

    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
  • California State Parks

    California State Parks

    1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 Pelican SB Designated Wildlife/Nature Viewing Designated Wildlife/Nature Viewing Visit Historical/Cultural Sites Visit Historical/Cultural Sites Smith River Off Highway Vehicle Use Off Highway Vehicle Use Equestrian Camp Site(s) Non-Motorized Boating Equestrian Camp Site(s) Non-Motorized Boating ( Tolowa Dunes SP C Educational Programs Educational Programs Wind Surfing/Surfing Wind Surfing/Surfing lo RV Sites w/Hookups RV Sites w/Hookups Gasquet 199 s Marina/Boat Ramp Motorized Boating Marina/Boat Ramp Motorized Boating A 101 ed Horseback Riding Horseback Riding Lake Earl RV Dump Station Mountain Biking RV Dump Station Mountain Biking r i S v e n m i t h R i Rustic Cabins Rustic Cabins w Visitor Center Food Service Visitor Center Food Service Camp Site(s) Snow Sports Camp Site(s) Geocaching Snow Sports Crescent City i Picnic Area Camp Store Geocaching Picnic Area Camp Store Jedediah Smith Redwoods n Restrooms RV Access Swimming Restrooms RV Access Swimming t Hilt S r e Seiad ShowersMuseum ShowersMuseum e r California Lodging California Lodging SP v ) l Klamath Iron Fishing Fishing F i i Horse Beach Hiking Beach Hiking o a Valley Gate r R r River k T Happy Creek Res. Copco Del Norte Coast Redwoods SP h r t i t e s Lake State Parks State Parks · S m Camp v e 96 i r Hornbrook R C h c Meiss Dorris PARKS FACILITIES ACTIVITIES PARKS FACILITIES ACTIVITIES t i Scott Bar f OREGON i Requa a Lake Tulelake c Admiral William Standley SRA, G2 • • (707) 247-3318 Indian Grinding Rock SHP, K7 • • • • • • • • • • • (209) 296-7488 Klamath m a P Lower CALIFORNIA Redwood K l a Yreka 5 Tule Ahjumawi Lava Springs SP, D7 • • • • • • • • • (530) 335-2777 Jack London SHP, J2 • • • • • • • • • • • • (707) 938-5216 l K Sc Macdoel Klamath a o tt Montague Lake A I m R National iv Lake Albany SMR, K3 • • • • • • (888) 327-2757 Jedediah Smith Redwoods SP, A2 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • (707) 458-3018 e S Mount a r Park h I4 E2 t 3 Newell Anderson Marsh SHP, • • • • • • (707) 994-0688 John B.
  • Air Force Sexual Assault Court-Martial Summaries 2010 March 2015

    Air Force Sexual Assault Court-Martial Summaries 2010 March 2015

    Air Force Sexual Assault Court-Martial Summaries 2010 March 2015 – The Air Force is committed to preventing, deterring, and prosecuting sexual assault in its ranks. This report contains a synopsis of sexual assault cases taken to trial by court-martial. The information contained herein is a matter of public record. This is the final report of this nature the Air Force will produce. All results of general and special courts-martial for trials occurring after 1 April 2015 will be available on the Air Force’s Court-Martial Docket Website (www.afjag.af.mil/docket/index.asp). SIGNIFICANT AIR FORCE SEXUAL ASSAULT CASE SUMMARIES 2010 – March 2015 Note: This report lists cases involving a conviction for a sexual assault offense committed against an adult and also includes cases where a sexual assault offense against an adult was charged and the member was either acquitted of a sexual assault offense or the sexual assault offense was dismissed, but the member was convicted of another offense involving a victim. The Air Force publishes these cases for deterrence purposes. Sex offender registration requirements are governed by Department of Defense policy in compliance with federal and state sex offender registration requirements. Not all convictions included in this report require sex offender registration. Beginning with July 2014 cases, this report also indicates when a victim was represented by a Special Victims’ Counsel. Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, sexual assaults against those 16 years of age and older are charged as crimes against adults. The appropriate disposition of sexual assault allegations and investigations may not always include referral to trial by court-martial.
  • Letter 2 (PDF)

    Letter 2 (PDF)

    SARAH PALIN, GOVERNOR 410 Willoughby Avenue, Suite 303 Post Office Box 111800 DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Juneau, Alaska 99811-1800 OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER Phone: 907-465-5066 Fax: 907-465-5070 www.dec.state.ak.us October 20, 2008 Elin Miller, Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900 Mail Code: RA-140 Seattle, WA 98101-3140 Dear Ms. Miller: The Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) has reviewed your th August 18 letter regarding EPA’s PM2.5 designations for Alaska and the nonattainment boundaries for the communities of Fairbanks and Juneau. We have carefully considered the available data and analyses. ADEC believes the available scientific evidence does not support EPA’s boundary recommendations which substantially expand upon those recommended by us. ADEC believes public health will be protected and the applicable legal requirements met by taking the actions described in this letter, which include a proposed nonattainment boundary for the Fairbanks area that is larger than originally proposed by ADEC, but smaller than proposed by EPA. For Juneau, we are requesting EPA revisit certain assumptions and include data from 2008 before making a final decision on whether a nonattainment designation is warranted, and if so, the appropriate boundaries of the nonattainment area. Protecting public health is a goal we share with EPA. As you are already aware, we are proactively and expeditiously working with the local governments to address identified PM2.5 concerns in Fairbanks and Juneau. To this end, ADEC does not believe EPA’s proposed boundaries will ultimately assist in protecting public health.
  • Technology Innovation and the Future of Air Force Intelligence Analysis

    Technology Innovation and the Future of Air Force Intelligence Analysis

    C O R P O R A T I O N LANCE MENTHE, DAHLIA ANNE GOLDFELD, ABBIE TINGSTAD, SHERRILL LINGEL, EDWARD GEIST, DONALD BRUNK, AMANDA WICKER, SARAH SOLIMAN, BALYS GINTAUTAS, ANNE STICKELLS, AMADO CORDOVA Technology Innovation and the Future of Air Force Intelligence Analysis Volume 2, Technical Analysis and Supporting Material RR-A341-2_cover.indd All Pages 2/8/21 12:20 PM For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RRA341-2 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0633-0 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2021 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. William Chockey; faraktinov, Adobe Stock. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.