DOCSLIB.ORG

I Ri IH Iiil W

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
I Ri IH Iiil W I i > tr 4 u 0 r tfce k rdoes ot kaow completely d I d i ttWy war t ftofro Mra tomk teen ealr or oomblaation Other a grain port for the wwj of se matie Mid employed la full nd tofalllble anything c 8OMK NEW BOOKS the lasu but their the < apter pf aixidenU irtll b > rti fc I whet does oaiitto7 Is It not trio appropriately when it rival winter wheat belts a fruit port for Central I ht whole flat re and countries might oonoelvablr the ITnl ed Stato that agnosUo k BUM derived from a regarded aa equivalent for what has been its entire relationship of raw ma- and the West India favor of Europe as of the theor- anyman think says St i It A Brttlth View of American lodnt United States aa producers probably ao aa the Amerioajs mal nickname it title pf honor assumed in an- variously called philosophical or If power to for Mexico and more or he knows anything he knowetli iu I1 Problems terials but might lack tho wok Arc Idagate it hU peculiar boast that he U alwajr read tithesis to a designation of contempt I etical or metaphysical nothing up vigorously and skilfully Coast and one of the great ocean theory o- yet as he ought to know There we la always something bo them u to take suoh forecasts a the not the legitimacy of the origin of a asia simply scepticism It is the have There to kamed again have industrial skill with ways for international trade Moreover- risks If n St Paul declaring any true t might the o and the right to use a title so and limits of human intelligence that knowled i from an intelligent onlookerand therefore it dominates the Gulf of Mexico which in author any comfort he is derived out the raw materials H- questions either the certainty of we can havethe knowledge that wo all i e welcome tho book entitled America world Cuba Jamai- ¬ to them W assumed fez fromapparent Ourautho ft Our author recognizes that a successful Itself is a commercial her every men¬ ought to have la a consciousness Pro km by W R LAWSON Mexico thinks that the terms atheist theIst knowledge and the veracity of of know industrial Americans will require ca tin Caribbean Islands and the ¬ Ing nothing But he Sons Wo wel- ¬ competitor of the AgnMtlelim mtheUt materialist and Idealist tal or the certainty of some par did not thereby pro Edinburgh Blackvpod reminds us however that if coast of Central America have possibilities per himself we not by any means both He Many persons will find their Ideas con- ¬ are terms muoh more serviceable and much of knowledge and the verity claim an agnostic anxious to con- come It although do omplo supplies of material and a highly which can only bo appreciated by close all conclusions or shore Its raw cerning some Important subjects clari- ¬ less objectionable freethinker Is of some particular mental power or vert men to agnosticism lie ex- accept all of Its personnel more than half of observers like the merchants of New Orleans than we recognize with satU efficient are fied a perusal of Agno tieiimt by be understood- The limitation of the word to the sphere- pressed the sense of the imperfection of misgivings What this Is absolutely- Cuba alone might by this time have fur after or than agnostic must if the Industrial battle There in knowledge and his desire that a- faction is tho authors endeavor to acquire are nltbed employment for a dozen regular Robert Flint Scribners The author as antithetic to the gnostic of church of religion la quite unjustifiable ¬ true only when Industrial combatants ¬ ¬ men humbly so it imperfection to main- ¬ who Is professor In the University of Edin Ho agnostic Im- no reason for calling a man an agnostic felt an not accurate Informationand hlscffort allowed to flghtltoutby them elves When lines of If the proposed reciproc- a history understood though of steamer burgh corresponding member of pre- ¬ merely because Is an atheist or a to be unduly proud of it which they art tain an impartial attitude politics conditions ity Islands had been mode and a plies that all except agnostics are he cum comes Into play natural under- ¬ Is ap- ¬ wry apt to be and indeed th he cannot escape from the British reversed and ratified last year that fluent tho Institute of France has here tenders to a knowledge which they do not tlvlst or a materialist The name ¬ may be upset and sometimes n Is Is lie says In his Intro- We- philosophical study propriate Indeed to one whose refusal- more apt the moro imperfect It A- ¬ view It true as In international trade politics may become blunder la corrected will taken a historical and possess while It does not give the least give cltl ¬ believe In God and of ccordingly his remarkable and profound duction that ho has tried to the The United States begin to enter Into the full usufruct of Its of agnosticism In the various indication to what knowledge they them- to the existence of creditforevery- the dominant factor word u Is ground that declaration was Immediately preceded tens oftlio United States full complain a state legacy from Spain A still more tremendous of the word The thing If not the selves profess to possess just as freet- spiritual things based on the system could scarcely of such con- ¬ the words we know that we all have know- good quality of thnlr Industrial policy of mixing- Impetus will bo given to the growth of was known to the Hebrews the Chinese hinker implies that those who do not the human mind in Inherently and managers the organlzore of things sing that the knowing whether ledge Knowledge puffeth up but lort The workmenthe up politics s if peculiarly their New Orleans when the Isthmus of Panama and the as well as to the Greeks think as be does who so cells himself Is a stitutionally incapable of banks tho railroads IndO in the God spiritual or edlfleth the financiers the own All over tho commercial world a shall have been cut by an interoccanlo nor was unheard of servile thinker whUe it gives no indication there are a and the speculators moa representa- ¬ timers IM which the tariff makers and ocn Is now demanded Should canal world the of wherein the freedom assumed differs not But no kind of truth business ¬ Lv I with studious attempt at ploy bo ground the re treated a It turn the United Kingdom prefers In a chapter on the American workman tive agnostics of the transition pro from the servility alleged Our author may not rejected on the that If sympathetically I ¬ talriie not American fiscal doctrines to American the opinion Is expressed that the kernel of tween the Middle Ages and contends that so understood the term human mind Inherently and constitu- What then U the precise relation of What are the problems of In- ¬ Europe Montaigne Pascalo Bayle are made differentiate tionally Incapable of ascertaining whether agnosticism scepticism to the doctrini cd Tho produce It might no longer be so easy for the labor question as between agnoetlo not fairly dustry which are hero dlscuN America- subjects of special comment while to the Huxley cud colleagues hi the or not there Is such truth The weakness of neteieneet This question Is which the the States to maintain flattering and the United States is this In of his thu main problem around other Unite It Is assumed that every laborer however agnosticism of Hume and Kant a whole Metaphysical Society None of them would of the human mild is a plea which may be answered in the book before us The Is propounded revolve thu is perfectly true as our author says low down In the scale has brain as well chapter is Turning from tho have admitted that he was a gnostic or brought any region of inquiry relation is not one of Identity Industrial army of 22 millions of men all It devote view Is same the that Americans have not yet reached the as muscle He Is encouraged to use Isis historical to pint of decline to maintain that he was antignostic and the plea the whatever be with what is called the doctrine of nes-¬ more or less trained and many highly considers or abso- ¬ region In which It Is brought forward 1 calm conservative frame of salad which and to save his muscle for his old Prof Flint first Nobody can be expected to acknowledge cience the designation often meaning an Industrial fund of nearly 8000 bran a- trained regards fiscal questions without personal Both for work and muscle lute agnosticism which he be that he is a pretender to a knowledge which Things however which have the same merely the agnostic or sceptical doctrine dollars vast command of capital bran hold ¬ million ¬ and unattainable ideal re nature should havethe same name Hence of nescience such ¬ or- anxiety The mere thought of a new work ho Is than are corre- he does not possess as would do a doctrine as unde- and financial skill the bestknown tart ral the several of mitigated and ever wherever assent Is withheld becaune of the rtakes to show all agno dis- ¬ sends a shiver through whole sponding laborers in Europe But and forms who called himself himself that what except both for production and ¬ ¬ ganization ¬ partial agnosticism There may be a par alleged of the mind to ascer- tics sceptics supposed to be knowledge special gifts of Industrial leader- manufacturers and importers The mam- here lies the secret of the matter the Amer to be called a gnostic The use of gnot tribution ¬ tial or limited agnosticism as to ultimate tain the truth the name agnosticism is science is really ignorance nesclence ship and political conditions of the most moth corporations are no less nervous cans contrive to get out of unskilled labor- in gnosticism and agno iicirm to mean not Any change only objects of knowledge as to God and the o applicable- unsupported
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stereotypes About Agnostics
    To Believe or Not to Believe: Stereotypes About agnostics by Veronica Nilendra Zivana Bergstrom A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Psychology University of Toronto © Copyright by Veronica Nilendra Zivana Bergstrom 2018 To Believe or Not to Believe: Stereotypes About agnostics Veronica Nilendra Zivana Bergstrom Master of Arts Department of Psychology University of Toronto 2018 Abstract The present study investigated which stereotypes agnostics share with atheists, and which stereotypes are unique to each group. In Study 1, participants reported stereotypes that they believed society held about agnostics, atheists, Christians, and Muslims. Common stereotypes for agnostics were indecisive and questioning, but for atheists were immoral and intolerant. In Study 2, participants rated how representative 10 key traits from Study 1 were of agnostics, atheists, and four religious groups. Results revealed that agnostics were stereotyped less negatively than atheists. In Study 3, participants had to judge whether a target’s actions, such as being immoral, morally indecisive, or indecisive in general were representative of an agnostic/atheist/Christian/Muslim. Inconsistent with Studies 1 and 2, no significant differences were found for perceptions of agnostics versus atheists. Findings from Studies 1-2 suggest that nonreligious individuals are sometimes viewed as a heterogeneous group, but future research must determine when stereotypes converge and diverge. ii Acknowledgments I would like to thanK my supervisor, Dr. Alison Chasteen, for her invaluable guidance and support. Secondly, I would liKe to thanK my subsidiary advisor, Dr. Jason PlaKs, for his feedbacK and expertise. Lastly, I would liKe to thanK my external examination committee member, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Asharism and Atheism- a Glimpse Into Two Parallel Ideologies
    Btibsjtn!bne!Buifjtn;! B!Hmjnqtf!Jnup!Uxp! Qbsbmmfm!Jefpmphjft Autor: Ali Boriqee Source: Multaqa Ahlul-Hadeet Compiled by: al-Mustaqeem Publicatons This page left intentionally blank +)#0 ; رب ا+"2<!، و(.- >; و:.9 و28رك /.- 5'234 1)#0 و/.- آ+& و()'& أ$#"! 0"8 >+9E4./ FGH ورAB8* ;< C#Dت I initiate this discussion to enrich the understanding of the Muslims and to solidify what some of them can somewhat already perceive, but only in a general fashion. It may be funny, but it has a great element of tragedy in that those who follow the Ash’ari school of thought, who claim to be the followers of rationalism, simply do not see the rationale and conclusive ramifications of what their school of thought leads to. Whenever the theological topics concerning “limit” and or “place” for Allah comes up, the two heated sides are usually the salafis who are labeled as the anthropomorphists versus the Ash’aris (and we can add the Maturidis) and who are labelled the “Jahmis”. However, what many from Ahlu-Sunnah among the salafis/ahlul-hadeeth have been slightly unaware of, is that the polemic is much graver than simply the kalaam arguments for “limit”, “jism”, and “place” respectively. Little will they realize that discussion on each one of these topics are actually connected to the topic of ilhaad (atheism) and that the formulated doctrines of the later day Ash’aris is nothing less than an institutionalized form of atheism. We will, in this endeavor, highlight Athari Imaams who have either explicitly stated this fact or who have implied this fact.
    [Show full text]
  • Bananas, Beliefs and the Being
    Bananas, Beliefs and The Being: A Pragmatic Refutation of Determined Agnostheism and its Harmful Effects Submitted by Margaret Jean Schneider Philosophy To The Honors College Oakland University In partial fulfillment of the requirement to graduate from The Honors College Mentor: Fritz J. McDonald, Associate Professor of Philosophy Philosophy Department Oakland University December 11, 2018 Schneider 1 Introduction Is the claim that “God’s existence is unknowable” a valid premise for a religious belief? This paper seeks to argue that “determined agnostheism”, a specific version of agnosticism that claims the existence of God unknowable, is an inadequate assertion. “Determined agnostheism” is a logically conceivable proposition that many individuals assert as a religious belief, yet, due to its claim that knowledge on God’s existence is ultimately unfathomable, its originating premise eliminates it from religious discussions. Previous philosophers of religion such as Richard Dawkins have expressed dissatisfaction with the “wishy-washy” tendencies of agnosticism, but none have gone as far as to prove its argument as incoherent. In order to accomplish this goal of proving this specific version of agnosticism as a false religious belief, an analytic approach that focuses on an explicit use of definitions, premises, and conclusion is implemented. The paper defines basic terms such as belief, doubt, and religion, followed by a contextual explanation of the most commonly held religious positions in relation to each other, namely atheism and theism. Next, agnosticism is explicitly defined, introducing the new term “determined agnostheism”. This version of agnosticism is evaluated under its logical existence as a proposition, and its actual existence as a religious belief using a process of logical deduction, implementing modus tollens.
    [Show full text]
  • Atheism, Agnosticism, and Nonbelief
    ATHEISM, AGNOSTICISM, AND NONBELIEF: A QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE STUDY OF TYPE AND NARRATIVE By Christopher Frank Silver Ralph W Hood Jr Jim Tucker Professor Professor (Co-Chair) (Co-Chair) Valerie C. Rutledge David Rausch Professor Assistant Professor (Committee Member) (Committee Member) Anthony J. Lease A. Jerald Ainsworth Dean of the College of Health, Education Dean of the Graduate School and Professional Studies ATHEISM, AGNOSTICISM, AND NONBELIEF: A QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE STUDY OF TYPE AND NARRATIVE By Christopher Frank Silver A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Education The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Chattanooga, Tennessee August 2013 ii Copyright © 2013 By Christopher Frank Silver All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Extensive research has been conducted in exploration of the American religious landscape, however recently has social science research started to explore Nonbelief in any detail. Research on Nonbelief has been limited as most research focuses on the popularity of the religious “nones” or the complexities of alternative faith expressions such as spirituality. Research has been limited in exploring the complexity of Nonbelief or how non-believers would identify themselves. Most research assumes nonbelievers are a monolithic group with no variation such as Atheism or Agnosticism. Through two studies, one qualitative and one quantitative, this study explored identity of Nonbelief. Study one (the qualitative study) discovered that individuals have shared definitional agreement but use different words to describe the different types of Nonbelief. Moreover, social tension and life narrative play a role in shaping one’s ontological worldview.
    [Show full text]
  • Atheism, Agnosticism, and Nonbelief
    ATHEISM, AGNOSTICISM, AND NONBELIEF: A QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE STUDY OF TYPE AND NARRATIVE By Christopher Frank Silver Ralph W Hood Jr Jim Tucker Professor Professor (Co-Chair) (Co-Chair) Valerie C. Rutledge David Rausch Professor Assistant Professor (Committee Member) (Committee Member) Anthony J. Lease A. Jerald Ainsworth Dean of the College of Health, Education Dean of the Graduate School and Professional Studies ATHEISM, AGNOSTICISM, AND NONBELIEF: A QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE STUDY OF TYPE AND NARRATIVE By Christopher Frank Silver A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Education The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Chattanooga, Tennessee August 2013 ii Copyright © 2013 By Christopher Frank Silver All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Extensive research has been conducted in exploration of the American religious landscape, however recently has social science research started to explore Nonbelief in any detail. Research on Nonbelief has been limited as most research focuses on the popularity of the religious “nones” or the complexities of alternative faith expressions such as spirituality. Research has been limited in exploring the complexity of Nonbelief or how non-believers would identify themselves. Most research assumes nonbelievers are a monolithic group with no variation such as Atheism or Agnosticism. Through two studies, one qualitative and one quantitative, this study explored identity of Nonbelief. Study one (the qualitative study) discovered that individuals have shared definitional agreement but use different words to describe the different types of Nonbelief. Moreover, social tension and life narrative play a role in shaping one’s ontological worldview.
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook-2Nd-Semeste
    SKE Society’s RANI PARVATI DEVI COLLEGE OF ARTS & COMMERCE Tilakwadi, Belagavi. DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY HANDBOOK Course Title: Orthodox and Medieval Indian philosophy Staff Member: Pierre Carvalho Class: BA IInd Semester Year: December 2017 – April 2018 Handbook – BA 6 th Semester – Philosophy 2 Table of Content 1. Syllabus & Time Budget ........................................... 3 2. Bibliography ............................................................. 5 3. Model Questions ...................................................... 6 4. Glossary .................................................................... 10 Handbook – BA 6 th Semester – Philosophy 3 SYLLABUS & TIME BUDGET: B.A Second Semester Paper: Orthodox and Medieval Indian philosophy Course Objectives: 1. To develop the Indian method of logical thinking 2. To know the significance of yoga in life 3. To know the social philosophy I. NYAYA and VAISHESHIKA: 1. Pramanas of Nyaya. 2. Categories of Vaisheshika. 3. Nature and proofs for God's existence according to Nyaya. II. SANKHYA-YOGA: 1. Satkaryavada, purusha, prakriti and evolution of the world. 2. Patanjali yoga, its psychology, chitt vrutti, pancha klesh, , chittabhumi, samadhi . 3. Astanga-yoga. III. PURVAMIMAMSA: 1. Theory of knowledge including Arthapathi and Anupalabdi 2. Theory of error: akhyati and viparitakyati. 3. Religion and Ethics; Karma, and apurva. IV. VEDANTA: 1. Advait of Shankara: Nirguna Brahman, Maya and Vivarthavada. 2. Vishistadvaita of Ramanuja: Saguna Brahman, refutation of Maya, Parinamavada. 3. Dvaita of Maddhva; Saguna Brahman, refutation of Maya, panchabheda. V. LINGAYATISM/VIRASHAIVISM: 1. Astavarana 2. Panchachara 3. Shatashala 4. Kayaka and dashoha gender and economic equality Handbook – BA 6 th Semester – Philosophy 4 Bibliography I. In English: 1. Outlines of India Philosophy. By M. Hiriyanna 2. A Critical Survey of Indian Philosophy. By C. D. Sharma 3. Essentials of Indian Philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary the Absurd—A Sense That the World Is Devoid
    Glossary The Absurd—a sense that the world is devoid of the purpose or meaning that human beings usually demand; also a key cultural aspect of existentialism in The Theatre of the Absurd (one example of which is Eugene Ionescu’s 1959 play “Rhinoceros”). Absurdity—a function of the contradiction between two elements of a situation. For Camus the foremost absurdity is the clash between humanity’s desire for understanding and meaning and a world that is foreign to any such desire. Agnostic Atheism--the philosophical view that encompasses both atheism and agnosticism. Due to definitional variance, an agnostic atheist does not believe in God or gods and by extension holds true: 'the existence and nonexistence of deities is currently unknown and may be absolutely unknowable', or 'knowledge of the existence and nonexistence of deities is irrelevant or unimportant', or 'abstention from claims of knowledge of the existence and nonexistence of deities is optimal'. Agnosticism--the philosophical view that the truth values of certain claims — particularly theological claims regarding the existence of God, gods, or deities — are unknown, inherently unknowable, or incoherent, and therefore, (some agnostics may go as far to say) irrelevant to life. Agnosticism, in both its strong (explicit) and weak (implicit) forms, is necessarily a non- atheist and non-theist position, though an agnostic person may also be either an atheist, a theist, or one who endorses neither position. Agnostic Theism--the philosophical view that encompasses both theism and agnosticism. An agnostic theist is one who views that the truth value of claims regarding the existence of god(s) is unknown or inherently unknowable but chooses to believe in god(s) in spite of this.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on Religion
    A Study on Religion Religious studies is the academic field of multi-disciplinary, secular study of religious beliefs, behaviors, and institutions. It describes, compares, interprets, and explains religion, emphasizing systematic, historically based, and cross-cultural perspectives. While theology attempts to understand the nature of transcendent or supernatural forces (such as deities), religious studies tries to study religious behavior and belief from outside any particular religious viewpoint. Religious studies draws upon multiple disciplines and their methodologies including anthropology, sociology, psychology, philosophy, and history of religion. Religious studies originated in the nineteenth century, when scholarly and historical analysis of the Bible had flourished, and Hindu and Buddhist texts were first being translated into European languages. Early influential scholars included Friedrich Max Müller, in England, and Cornelius P. Tiele, in the Netherlands. Today religious studies is practiced by scholars worldwide. In its early years, it was known as Comparative Religion or the Science of Religion and, in the USA, there are those who today also know the field as the History of religion (associated with methodological traditions traced to the University of Chicago in general, and in particular Mircea Eliade, from the late 1950s through to the late 1980s). The field is known as Religionswissenschaft in Germany and Sciences de la religion in the French-speaking world. The term "religion" originated from the Latin noun "religio", that was nominalized from one of three verbs: "relegere" (to turn to constantly/observe conscientiously); "religare" (to bind oneself [back]); and "reeligare" (to choose again).[1] Because of these three different meanings, an etymological analysis alone does not resolve the ambiguity of defining religion, since each verb points to a different understanding of what religion is.[2] During the Medieval Period, the term "religious" was used as a noun to describe someone who had joined a monastic order (a "religious").
    [Show full text]
  • New Atheism As a Case of Competitive Postsecular Worldviews
    New Atheism as a Case of Competitive Postsecular Worldviews Alan G. Nixon 98061264 A dissertation submitted to the School of Social Sciences and Psychology The University of Western Sydney In part fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Social Sciences 2014 Acknowledgements I would firstly like to thank my interview participants for their time, as I would not have been able to have a well-rounded thesis without their views. Secondly, my family and friends for their support throughout this long process. I would especially like to thank my mother Kim for her tireless editing. I would also like to thank my primary supervisor Adam Possamai for his efforts in helping this project to come to completion. Last, but certainly not least, my partner Megan, who supported me through all the ups and downs that such a large project entails. I could not have done it without all of you. Statement of Authorship The work presented in this thesis is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, original except as acknowledged in the text. I hereby declare that I have not submitted this material, either in full or in part for a degree at this or any other institution. Alan Nixon Date: …………………………………………. Signature: ………………………………….. Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................................ V LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................................................VI
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Scoping Exercise Report PARTICIPANTS
    1 Nonreligion in a Complex Future (NCF) Canadian Scoping Exercise Report PARTICIPANTS: Peter Beyer, Ted Malcolmson, Sana Patel, Cory Steele, and Lauren Strumos (University of Ottawa); Solange Lefebvre (Université de Montréal) INTRODUCTION This report outlines the findings of a scoping exercise on nonreligion in Canada across the five key areas of the NCF project: health (Ted Malcolmson), migration (Sana Patel), law (Cory Steele), the environment (Lauren Strumos), and education (Solange Lefebvre). The main purpose of the exercise was to identify research gaps in literature related to nonreligion in Canada by exploring what research has already been done on nonreligion. In addition to peer reviewed articles and books, this exercise incorporated non- academic sources to help identify manifestations of nonreligion currently unexplored in scholarship. These sources include news articles, government surveys and reports, various forms of media, and the websites of nonreligious organizations. Internet sources authored by nonreligious individuals also offered insight into nonreligious ways of thinking that are absent from qualitative research. The following general keywords were used to conduct the scoping exercise: agnostic, atheism, atheist, de-churched, freethinkers, humanists, humanism, infidel, irreligion, irreligious, nonbelief, nonbelievers, nones, secularism, secularists, secular spirituality, spiritual but not religious, spirituality, unaffiliated, unbelief, and unchurched The first section of this report offers a brief overview of nonreligious demographics in Canada. The second section summarizes the findings of the scoping exercise and is divided by the NCF project’s focal areas. Emphasis is placed on existing academic literature though suggestions are also made for future possible directions of NCF research. A list of surveys that may prove helpful for future research is then provided.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lived Experience of Atheist and Irreligious Youth Living Within
    THE LIVED EXPERIENCE OF ATHEIST AND IRRELIGIOUS YOUTH LIVING WITHIN RELIGIOUS HOUSEHOLDS by ANTHONY WAYNE HANSEN (Under the Direction of Anneliese A. Singh) ABSTRACT In the U.S., the population of people who identify as atheist or irreligious is growing (Brewster et al., 2014; Zuckerman, 2010, 2011; Kosmin & Keysar, 2008; Zuckerman, 2007). Recent studies show that atheism and irreligious people are viewed in a negative light with many persons in the US; as antipathy toward atheists is greater when compared to other religious groups, racial and ethnic groups, or (LGBTQ) people (Cragun et al., 2012). Hunsberger and Altemeyer (2006) found that conflict within family structures over a family member’s lack of belief caused feelings of ostracism and discrimination from other religious family members. Moreover, adolescents report poorer parental relationships when parents are more religious than the youth (Kim-Spoon, Longo, & McCullogough, 2012). Research on atheism remains poor within social science scholarship, psychology, and within counseling psychology specifically. Yet it is apparent that non-belief is quickly becoming a valid issue of diversity within psychology and counseling psychology as a profession (Brewster et al., 2014; D’Andrea & Sprenger, 2007). Counseling psychology has traditionally been at the forefront of social justice issues and cultural competencies within APA, yet the lack of attention to atheism as a diversity issue is problematic (Brewster et al., 2014). The current study sought to explore and understand the experiences of self-identified atheist/irreligious youth who live with their religious parents or are dependent on parents for financial support. A qualitative methodology known as psychological phenomenology, centered in social constructivist theory (Gergen, 1985; Creswell, 2012) and guided by the minority stress model (Meyer, 2003), served as the theoretical foundation into the exploration of the lived experiences of atheist and irreligious youth living within religious households.
    [Show full text]
  • Atheism Profile
    Atheism By Robert M. Bowman, Jr. Organizations: American Atheists; American Humanist Association; Atheists United; Council for Secular Humanism; Freedom from Religion Foundation Books: Bertrand Russell, Why I Am Not a Christian; George Smith, Atheism: The Case Against God; Sam Harris, The End of Faith and Letter to a Christian Nation; Daniel Dennett, Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon; Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion; Christopher Hitchens, god Is Not Great; Michael Martin (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Atheism Periodicals: Free Inquiry; The Humanist; Reason; Skeptical Inquirer Definition and Related Views: Atheism is the belief that rejects belief in the existence of God, however conceived. Agnosticism is the belief that God’s existence is unknown or unknowable. (An agnostic can be an atheist.) Skepticism is the belief that only what one can irrefutably prove is knowable; modern skepticism questions the validity of supernatural and paranormal experiences and events. Naturalism is the belief that only nature exists. Nihilism is the belief that human life has no meaning or purpose (since there is no God who created us). Humanism is the belief that human life does have meaning and purpose, but that human beings themselves are the source and standard of positive human values. (This definition does not apply to the movement called Renaissance humanism.) Secularism is the belief that public, social, and governmental values should be devoid of religious influence. Religious humanism affirms that humanism is compatible with religious or spiritual beliefs (though not with belief in the supernatural); secular humanism denies such compatibility. HISTORY Atheism has existed in various forms for well over two thousand years, but became a culturally powerful movement only in the past two centuries.
    [Show full text]