sign in sign up
<<
Home , Baryon

arXiv:1002.1754v4 [hep-ph] 1 Sep 2010 eeaino poieciaiy hr h e new the where fermionic chirality, new single opposite have a of adding by generation cancelled are anomalies where h tnadmdlbsdo h ag , gauge the on based model SU standard the and gauged are L and low-scale. a B at where broken model spontaneously pa new are this a In propose invariant.) dimension we B-L the per are that since above issue (Note mentioned this operators address [2]. six not does decay B-L gauging to to operators bary scales violating six GUT dimension number of and contribution weak the not the suppress does between adequately one region” Then TeV). “desert a a around (i.e., need low is breaking B L for scale and the where symmetries gauge broken spontaneously [5].). Ref. the see observe bounds, ex- to current future and possible (For proposals be number perimental may and it expected number future baryon also of the is violation In number broken. lepton be Hence to see the [4]. through mechanism masses saw of one smallness since the appealing explain very can is Als masses . neutrino the Majorana in having - the of gin [3]. decay beta double neutrinoless and su [2] couplings) decay renormalizable proton the as by phenomen permitted new not to are rise (that give operators These [1]. respectively oe efidta hr santrlsprsino flavor of suppression natural a is there that find we model ere.I diinteidvda etnnumbers, lepton individual the addition sym- global In accidental are (L) metries. number lepton and (B) number etnnme.Frexample, and number For baryon violate number. that lepton operators find level can non-renormalizable one furthermore, SM the the At and massive. scale are electroweak the the at symmetries exact niiullpo numbers oscillat lepton neutrinos individual Since couplings. renormalizable the of where ecntutaddsusasml xeso of extension simple a discuss and construct We are L and B that possibility the examine we paper this In ori- the explain to order in broken be must number Baryon nteSadr oe S)o atcepyisbaryon physics of (SM) Model Standard the In (3) 3 = L L Λ N i B = SU and L n h diinlqak have additional the and osrit n inl tteLreHdo oldraebri are Collider au an Large is the candidate at matter signals dark and a constraints of stability c and the neutral that changing finds flavor the one level in tree violation forbid flavour content of particle suppression sees the natural anomalies of the a realization and is footing interesting same an the is on There are generation. L and B theory this In (2) e , Λ eivsiaeasml hoyweeBro ubr()adLe and (B) number Baryon where theory simple a investigate We L L N µ , r h clsweeBadLaebroken, are L and B where scales the are aynadLpo ubra oa ag Symmetries Gauge Local as Number Lepton and Baryon L .INTRODUCTION I. U τ (1) r loatmtcgoa symmetries global automatic also are , Y U N (1) QQQL/ U L (1) 2 i o given a for , aionaIsiueo ehooy aaea A 12 US 91125 CA, Pasadena, Technology, of Institute California 1 B nvriyo icni-aio,Dprmn fPhysics of Department Wisconsin-Madison, of University 10Uiest vne aio,W 30,UAand USA 53706, WI Madison, Avenue, University 1150 N Λ B 2 ae ieizP´erez Fileviez Pavel U (1) and 1 = B L LLHH/ The . i antbe cannot , Dtd coe 3 2018) 23, October (Dated: nthis In . U (1) the e Λ on ch L L in o a i - - , 1 wmcaimfrnurn ass utemr there Furthermore masses. neutrino for mechanism aw n akB Wise B. Mark and ret novn h urso hre etn.Also leptons. charged or quarks the involving urrents oe h Mfilstasomas: transform fields SM the model nasml xeso ftesadr oe hoybased theory model group standard gauge the the of extension on simple a in eei inl tteLreHdo oldradterelevan the most discussed. and The briefly Collider are Hadron constraints Large an symmetry. the is at gauge stability signals the its generic and of candidate consequence matter operators. dark automatic a violating does has number symmetry model baryon The gauge dangerous show the generate of we the not breaking leptonic and for investigated spontaneous mechanism charged is the seesaw and masses that the neutrino quark of of the realization generation in The level sectors. tree at violation (3 toso ih addneutrinos, handed right of ations (3 (1 isi h Mguegopsol estse swell.): as satisfied be should anoma- group the gauge that one SM mind the in theory in keep following lies free to the has anomaly cancel one course to an (Of anomalies find new additional to add order to needs In ne of masses. generation the trino study to above model standard fl discussed. efly oai osqec fteguesmer.Some symmetry. gauge the of consequence tomatic , , , nti eto eso o ocne h anomalies the cancel to how show we section this In 2 1 1 etncscossneteguesmere and symmetries gauge the since sectors leptonic ayncAnomalies: Baryonic • , , , I AGN AYNADLPO NUMBERS LEPTON AND BARYON GAUGING II. 1 2 − r acle yadn igenwfermionic new single a adding by cancelled are / / 1 tnnme L r oa ag symmetries. gauge local are (L) number pton 6 3 , – – – – , , 0 1 1 , a h otiuin falqak n n finds one and quarks all A of contributions the has A urscnrbt n n finds one and contribute quarks Mqak aetesm aynnme,this number, baryon same the have quarks SM A A oe eeoenesetasae nanon-trivial a in states extra of representation needs one here fore, nyoeqakdoublet, quark one only A antcne hsanomaly, this cancel cannot / / 1) 3 3 3 SM 3 1 4 2 , , ne h ag ru.W d he gener- three add We group. gauge the under 0) 0) U SU U SU l , d , = (1) (1) 2 (3) (2) L T − R Y 2 Y ( = 2 3 2 2 G N N . ∼ N N SM A ,e ν, U U U U (3 (1) (1) SU N (1) (1) ) , L 1 B B 2 U (2) , B B   ∼ − ν (1)   nteAeinsco one sector Abelian the In : nti ae ic all since case, this In : R nti aealthe all case this In : ic nteS hr is there SM the in Since : . 1 (1 Q / B ∼ L 3 , Q , 2 N o ahfml one family each for , 1 A , (1 L T / − 2 SM U 3 , A 1 1 , (1) ( = / 1 SM 0) , 2 0 = , , , L 0 0 0 = nthis In . and ,d u, , , 2 3 1) 1) There- . . u , othe to , e ) L R R u- ∼ ∼ ∼ t 2

anomaly is equivalent to the U(1)Y anomaly con- These are the two simplest fermionic contents that dition in the SM, i.e. SM =0. give an anomaly free theory with gauge group A4 SU(3) SU(2) U(1)Y U(1)B U(1)L. For – 5 (U(1)B): The baryon- anomaly is also N N N N cancelledA in the SM, SM =0. the study of the phenomenological properties of models with A5 3 an extra generation see Ref. [8]. – 6 U(1)B : In this case one finds that this anomalyA is zero in the SM, SM =0. A6 • Leptonic Anomalies: III. MASS GENERATION AND FLAVOUR VIOLATION

2 – 7 SU(2) U(1)L : It is easy to show that A. Quark Sector ASM =3/2.N  A7 2 – 8 U(1)Y U(1)L : As in the previous case, We begin by considering the case 1), new generation where inA the SM thisN anomalyis notzero, SM = 3/2. the chirality is the same as in the generations. A8 − 2 Masses for the new quarks present in the model are generated – 9 U(1)Y U(1)L : In the SM this anomaly is cancelled.A N  from their couplings to the SM Higgs:

′ ′ – 10 (U(1)L): The lepton-gravity anomaly is can- (1) ′ ˜ A ∆ ′ = hU Q H uR celled since we add three families of right-handed − Lq mass L ′ ′ ′ neutrinos, νR (1, 1, 0, 0, 1). + h Q H d + h.c., (1) ∼ D L R 3 – 11 U(1) : As in the previous case this A L where H (1, 2, 1/2, 0, 0) is the SM Higgs, and H˜ = anomaly is cancelled once we add three families ∗ ∼ of right-handed neutrinos. iσ2H . To avoid having a stable colored particle we couple the We have to cancel all the anomalies discussed above (and not SM fermions to the new fourth generation quarks. How- induce standard model gauge anomalies as well) in order to ever, at the same time it is important to avoid tree level fla- find an anomaly free theory with B and L gauged. For a pre- vor changing neutral currents in the quark sector. We achieve vious study of these anomalies see Ref. [6]. this goal by adding a new scalar field, φ (1, 2, 1/2, 4/3, 0) ∼ There are two simple ways to cancel the anomalies. They which does not get a vev. The interactions of this scalar are, ′ ˜ are: Y1 QL φuR + h.c., which permit the new fourth generation quarks to decay to a scalar and a standard model quark. One • Case 1) All baryonic anomalies are cancelled adding ′ ′ ′ T might think that this particle is the . Unfortunately, new quarks, QL = (u , d )L (3, 2, 1/6, 1, 0), 0 ′ ′ ∼ − it is not consistent with experiment [9] to have the φ be the , and , uR (3, 1, 2/3, 1, 0) dR (3, 1, 1/3, 1, 0) dark matter because the mass degeneracyof the imaginary and which∼ transform− as the SM quarks∼ but− with− baryon real parts [10]. number, B = 1. At the same time the leptonic ′ − T Next we consider case 2), where the new fermions have the anomalies are cancelled if one adds new leptons lL = ′ ′ ′ opposite chirality to the standard model. We shall see that in (ν ,e )L (1, 2, 1/2, 0, 3), eR (1, 1, 1, 0, 3) ′ ∼ − − ∼ − − this case there is a dark matter candidate. Now, mass for the and νR (1, 1, 0, 0, 3). All anomalies in the SM new quarks is generated through the terms, gauge group∼ are cancelled− since we have introducedone (2) ′ ′ ′ new full family. It differs from the usual standard model ∆ ′ = Y Q H˜ u − Lq mass U R L families since the new quarks have mi- ′ ′ ′ nus one and the new leptons have lepton number minus + YD QR H dL + h.c.. (2) three[17]. Decays of the new quarks are induced by adding a new scalar • Case 2) The baryonic anomalies are cancelled adding field X with gauge quantum numbers, X (1, 1, 0, 2/3, 0) ′ ′ ′ T ∼ − new quarks, QR = (u , d )R (3, 2, 1/6, 1, 0), and the following terms occur in the Lagrange density: ′ ′ ∼ u (3, 1, 2/3, 1, 0), and d (3, 1, 1/3, 1, 0), L ∼ L ∼ − (2) ′ ′ which transform as the SM quarks of opposite chiral- ∆ = λQ X QL Q + λU X uR u − LDM R L ity but with baryon number, B = 1. At the same time ′ + λD X dR dL + h.c.. (3) the leptonic anomalies are cancelled if one adds new ′ ′ ′ ′ T leptons lR = (ν ,e )R (1, 2, 1/2, 0, 3), eL The field X does not get a vev and so there is no mass mix- ′ ∼ − ∼ (1, 1, 1, 0, 3) and νL (1, 1, 0, 0, 3). All anomalies ing between the new exotic generation quarks and the stan- in the− SM gauge group∼ are cancelled since we have in- dard model ones. When X is the lightest new particle with troduced one new full family but with opposite chirality. baryon number, it is stable. This occurs because the model ′ ′ ′ It also differs from the usual standard model families has a global U(1) symmetry where the QR, uL, dL and X get since the new quarks have baryon number one and the multiplied by a phase. This U(1) symmetry is an automatic new leptons have lepton number three. consequence of the gauge symmetry and the particle content. 3

Notice that the new fermions have V +A interactions with the The interactions that generate masses for the new leptons in W-. The X particle is a dark matter candidate and its case 2) are: properties will be investigated in a future publication. (2) ′′ ′ ′ The field X has flavor changing couplings that cause tran- ∆ l = YE lR H eL + h.c. (9) − L ′′ ′ ′ sitions between quarks with baryon number 1 and the usual (2) C ∆ = Yν lHν + Y l¯ Hν˜ + quarks with baryon number 1/3. However, since there is no − Lν ν R L λ ′ mass mixing between these two types of quarks integrating + a νC S νC + λ νC S† ν 2 L c L L out the X does not generate any tree level flavor changing ′ ′ ¯ † neutral currents for the ordinary quarks. Those first occur at + λl lR lLSL + λe e¯R eL SL + h.c., (10) the one loop level. Notice that in this case SL does not get a vev in order to avoid tree level lepton flavour violation. Then, the neutrinos can be Dirac fermions and one has to introduce a new scalar field to B. Leptonic Sector ′ break U(1)L. Let us say S (1, 1, 0, 0,nL), where nL = L ∼ 6 2, 6. Notice that if in this case we do not introduce SL, the The interactions that generate masses for the new charged ± ± leptons in case 1) are: heavy extra Dirac neutrino is stable and it is difficult to satisfy the experimental bounds from dark matter direct detection in (1) ′ ′ ′ combination with the collider bounds on a heavy stable Dirac ∆ = YE lL H eR + h.c. (4) − Ll neutrino. while for the neutrinos they are In order to complete the discussion of

′ ′ we introduce a new Higgs, SB, with non-zero baryon number (1) C ∆ ν = Yν lHν + Yν l HN + (but no other gauge quantum numbers) which gets the vev, − L ′ λ v , breaking U(1) and giving mass to the leptophobic Z . + a νC S νC + λ νC S† N + h.c.,(5) B B B L b L In summary, the Higgs sector in case 2) is composed of the 2 ′ SM Higgs, S , S , S and X. This is the minimal Higgs where is the Higgs that breaks , L L B SL (1, 1, 0, 0, 2) U(1)L sector needed to have a realistic theory where B and L are generating∼ masses for the right-handed neutrinos and the ′ C C both gauged, and have a DM candidate. quark-phobic ZL. We introduce the notation ν = (νR) and N = (ν′ )C . After symmetry breaking the mass matrix R ′ for neutrinos in the left handed basis, (ν,ν ,N,νC ), is given IV. FLAVOUR VIOLATION AND SIGNALS AT THE LHC by the eight by eight matrix • Flavour Violation: 0 0 0 MD ′  0 0 M 0  Even though there are no quark flavor changing neu- ′ D N = T . (6) tral currents at tree level, they do occur at the one loop M  0 (MD) 0 Mb   T T  level. The scalar X is used to couple the fourth gen- MD 0 Mb Ma  eration quarks to the ordinary ones and we find that Here, M = Y v /√2 and M = λ v /√2 are 3 3 ma- at one loop there are box diagrams that give contribu- D ν H a a L ′ ′ ∗ × trices, Mb = λbv /√2 is a 1 3 matrix, M = Y vH /√2 tions (after integrating out the heavy particles) to the L × D ν ¯ is a number and SL = vL/√2. Lets assume that the three effective Lagrangian for K K mixing of the form, h i C 4 ¯ µ ¯ − 2 2 right-handed neutrinos ν are the heaviest. Then, integrating λ dL,Rγ sL,RdL,RγµsL,R/(16π M ) + h.c., where them out generates the following mass matrix for the three the product of the four elements of the Yukawa matrix light-neutrinos : λi (and CKM angles) that enter into the coefficient are denoted by λ4 and M denotes a mass scale set by the −1 T ν = MD M M . (7) masses of the new fields in the loop. For M of order M a D 100 GeV this is negligible provided λ< 10−2. In addition, a Majorana mass M ′ for the fourth generation right handed neutrino N, Charged lepton neutral currents are induced at one loop level. For example, there is a one loop contribution to ′ M = M M −1M T , (8) the amplitude for µ eγ. It involves the usual fac- b a b → ′ ′ tor of the mass and one loop suppression factor. is generated. Furthermore, suppose that M << M , then In addition it requires two factors of the mixing be- ′ D the new fourth generation neutrinos ν and N are quasi-Dirac tween the essentially massless ordinary neutrinos and ′ with a mass equal to MD. Of course we need this mass to the new fourth generation neutrino. In the limit we dis- be greater than MZ /2 to be consistent with the measured Z- cussed above where the fourth generation neutrino in width. In this model we have a consistent mechanism quasi-Dirac this mixing is small. A detailed study of for neutrino masses which is a particular combination of Type the flavour violation issue in this context is beyond the I seesaws [4]. scope of this letter. 4

• ZL and ZB: V. SUMMARY In this model one can observe lepton number violat- ing processes at the LHC through the channels with We have constructed and investigated a simple theory ∗ same-sign dileptons: pp ZL νR νR where Baryon (B) number and Lepton (L) number are local ± ± ∓ ∓ → → → W W ei ej . However, for this Drell-Yan produc- gauge symmetries. In this theory, B and L are treated on the tion one needs the mixing between Z and ZL,or ZL and same footing, anomalies are cancelled by adding a single new ZB. One can also have pair production of ZL through fermionic generation, there is a simple realization of the see- its couplings to the physical Higgses. For a study of saw mechanism for neutrino masses and there is a natural sup- these channels see Ref. [11]. In the case of the lepto- pression for flavour violation at tree level in the quark and lep- phobic ZB its coupling to the third generation of quarks tonic sectors. It is important to emphasize that in this theory can be used to observe it at the LHC. In particular, the theB and L violationscales can beaslow asTeV andonedoes ∗ ¯ channel: pp ZB t t. For previous studies of not have dangerous processes, such as . Also one → ′ → a lepto-phobic Z see Ref. [12]. For a review on the finds that the stability of a dark matter candidate is an auto- properties of new U(1) gauge bosons see for example matic consequence of the gauge symmetry. Constraints and Ref. [13]. signals at the have been briefly dis- cussed. The results of our paper can be applied to different • Decays of the new quarks: theories for physics beyond the Standard Model, such as the As we have discussed above to avoid a stable colored Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model, where new inter- particle we introduced the new interactions in Eq.(3). actions can give rise to fast proton decay. Now we discuss signals at the LHC coming from these interactions. Here we will focus on the case where the new quarks can decay into X and the . Then, Acknowledgment ′ ′ one can have the interesting channel: pp t¯ t → → X X tt¯ . Since X is stable, the final state has missing P. F. P. would like to thank T. Han and S. Spinner for use- energy and a tt¯ pair (After posting the first version of ful discussions and pointing out Ref. [14]. The work of P. F. this article the paper [14] appeared.). P. was supported in part by the U.S. Department of Energy • Baryon number violating processes: contract No. DE-FG02-08ER41531 and in part by the Wis- consin Alumni Research Foundation. The work of M.B.W. Since baryon number is spontaneously broken it is im- was supported in part by the U.S. Department of Energy un- portant to consider possible baryon number violating der contract No. DE-FG02-92ER40701. operators that might arise after symmetry breaking. Us- ing the minimal Higgs sector discussed above one can 2 see that the operator, QQQL/ΛB, is never generated since we do not have a Higgs which carries B and L quantum numbers. Also, in general we expect the [1] S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 (1979) 1566. ∆B = 2 operators only when SB has B = 2, but in [2] For a review see: P. Nath and P. Fileviez P´erez, Phys. Rept. 441 general we do not induce this operator as well. Hence (2007) 191 [arXiv:hep-ph/0601023]. the model we have introduced does not give rise to dan- [3] For a review see: S. R. Elliott and P. Vogel, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 52 (2002) 115 [arXiv:hep-ph/0202264]. gerous baryon number operators. At the same time, in [4] P. Minkowski, Phys. Lett. B 67 (1977) 421. T. Yanagida, in order to avoid the vev for X, one should forbid the Proceedings of the Workshop on the Unified Theory and the terms with an odd power of X in the scalar poten- Baryon Number in the Universe, eds. O. Sawada et al., (KEK tial. Then, one must impose the condition B(SB) = Report 79-18, Tsukuba, 1979), p. 95. M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond 2/3, 1/3, 2/9, 2. 6 and R. Slansky, in Supergravity, eds. P. van Nieuwenhuizen et ± ± ± ± al., (North-Holland, 1979), p. 315. S.L. Glashow, in Quarks and • Other aspects: Leptons, Carg`ese, eds. M. L´evy et al., (Plenum, 1980), p. 707. It is well known, that in any model with an extra R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovi´c, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 (1980) 912. fermionic generation one finds that the fusion [5] D. Autiero et al., JCAP 0711 (2007) 011 [arXiv:0705.0116 cross section for the SM Higgs is larger by a factor 9. [hep-ph]]. See for example Ref. [15]. However, the new results [6] R. Foot, G. C. Joshi and H. Lew, Phys. Rev. D 40 (1989) 2487. from CDF and D0 [16], do not rule out our model when [7] C. D. Carone and H. Murayama, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 484. the Higgs mass is 114 GeV < MH < 120 GeV, or [8] P. H. Frampton, P. Q. Hung and M. Sher, Phys. Rept. 330 (2000) 263 [arXiv:hep-ph/9903387]. See also: B. Holdom, W. S. Hou, when MH > 200 GeV. Notice that for a large mixing between H and the singlets S and S one can relax T. Hurth, M. L. Mangano, S. Sultansoy and G. Unel, PMC Phys. L B A 3 (2009) 4 [arXiv:0904.4698 [hep-ph]]. those constraints. For the study of other aspects, such [9] M. Drees and G. Gerbier, in PDG, Phys. Lett. B 667 (2008) 1. as electroweak precision constraints, see for example [10] M. Cirelli, N. Fornengo and A. Strumia, Nucl. Phys. B 753 Ref. [15]. (2006) 178 [arXiv:hep-ph/0512090]. 5

[11] P. Fileviez P´erez, T. Han and T. Li, Phys. Rev. D 80 and C. D. Carone, Phys. Lett. B 443 (1998) 352 (2009) 073015 [arXiv:0907.4186 [hep-ph]]. K. Huitu, S. Khalil, [arXiv:hep-ph/9809522]. H. Okada and S. K. Rai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 181802 [13] P. Langacker, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 (2008) 1199 [arXiv:0803.2799 [hep-ph]]. J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, Nucl. [arXiv:0801.1345 [hep-ph]]. Phys. B 828 (2010) 289 [arXiv:0905.2221 [hep-ph]]. L. Basso, [14] J. Alwall, J. L. Feng, J. Kumar and S. Su, arXiv:1002.3366 A. Belyaev, S. Moretti and C. H. Shepherd-Themistocleous, [hep-ph]. Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 055030 [arXiv:0812.4313 [hep- [15] G. D. Kribs, T. Plehn, M. Spannowsky and T. M. P. Tait, Phys. ph]]. E. Salvioni, A. Strumia, G. Villadoro and F. Zwirner, Rev. D 76 (2007) 075016 [arXiv:0706.3718 [hep-ph]]. arXiv:0911.1450 [hep-ph]. [16] T. Aaltonen et al. [CDF and D0 Collaborations], [12] D. C. Bailey and S. Davidson, Phys. Lett. B 348 (1995) 185 arXiv:1001.4162 [hep-ex]. [arXiv:hep-ph/9411355]. C. D. Carone and H. Murayama, [17] For the case of baryonic anomalies see Ref. [7] which pro- Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) 3122 [arXiv:hep-ph/9411256]. poses the same baryon number charge assignment for the exotic M. Drees, O. J. P. Eboli and J. K. Mizukoshi, Phys. Lett. fourth generation. B 447, 116 (1999) [arXiv:hep-ph/9811343]. A. Aranda