DOCSLIB.ORG

Transcription Factor Lhx2 Is Necessary and Sufficient to Suppress

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transcription Factor Lhx2 Is Necessary and Sufficient to Suppress Transcription factor Lhx2 is necessary and sufficient PNAS PLUS to suppress astrogliogenesis and promote neurogenesis in the developing hippocampus Lakshmi Subramaniana,1, Anindita Sarkara,1, Ashwin S. Shettya, Bhavana Muralidharana, Hari Padmanabhana, Michael Piperb, Edwin S. Monukic, Ingolf Bachd, Richard M. Gronostajskie,f, Linda J. Richardsb, and Shubha Tolea,2 aDepartment of Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai 400005, India; bQueensland Brain Institute and School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia; cDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697; dPrograms in Gene Function and Expression and Molecular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605; eDepartment of Biochemistry, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14203; and fDevelopmental Genomics Group, New York State Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics and Life Sciences, Buffalo, NY 14203 AUTHOR SUMMARY During the development of the verte- memory. We used two approaches to brate CNS, progenitor cells generate disrupt Lhx2 function in progenitors at neurons, the primary players in circuits, the peak of hippocampal neurogenesis, and glia, the support cells. A character- embryonic gestation day (E) 15. Condi- istic feature of this process, common to tional KO mice were used, in which the all vertebrate species, is that the pro- gene encoding Lhx2 protein was dis- duction of neurons precedes that of glial rupted by the introduction of an enzyme cells (1). The transition from neuro- called “Cre recombinase,” which can cut genesis to gliogenesis determines the and paste DNA (2). The second ap- number of neurons vs. support cells that proach used a “dominant-negative” con- NEUROSCIENCE are produced in a given structure. This struct that encodes a protein capable process is also likely to be one of the of binding Lhx2 and prevents it from critical steps shaped by evolution to bring accessing essential cofactors, thus ren- about the diversity of nervous systems dering it inactive. Each agent was in- and subsystems seen across verte- troduced directly into the embryonic brate species. brain at E15 using in utero surgical A common progenitor for neurons and techniques, which allow the perturbation glia means that intrinsic mechanisms of a small population of cells in an oth- within the cell or extrinsic cues from erwise normal background of unaltered surrounding cells or more distant regions cells (3). Briefly, the uterus is exposed must act to initiate a switch from neu- and DNA is introduced into the brain of rogenesis to gliogenesis. The molecular the embryo using a fine-glass capillary. mechanisms that control this switch are Electroporation is carried out by not well understood, but a cellular sig- placing electrodes, such that the nega- naling pathway known to play a funda- tively charged DNA moves toward the mental role in this process is triggered by positive electrode placed on the side the membrane receptor protein Notch. of the target tissue. The uterus is During the early neurogenic period, Fig. P1. Molecular control of cell fate in the replaced in the abdomen, the opening Notch signaling maintains proliferating developing hippocampus. (A) Progenitor cells (blue is sutured, and the mouse is allowed circles) first give rise to neurons (green triangles) and to recover (3). The manipulated embryos progenitors in an undifferentiated state then glia (yellow stars). This change in cell fate is so that the precursor pool may be ex- can be examined several days later, paralleled by decreasing levels of transcription factor – panded (1). At later stages, however, this Lhx2. Removing Lhx2 from early progenitors causes and we selected a stage 6 8 d after pathway has a distinct role in instructing them to produce glia prematurely. Supplementing electroporation, by which time the pro- gliogenesis (1). Although Notch signal- Lhx2 levels in late progenitors is sufficient to prolong genitors that incorporated the DNA ing is active from the early stages of de- their neuron production phase. Therefore, Lhx2 is fi velopment in the progenitor cells, glia necessary and suf cient to suppress glia production (specifically, astroglia or astrocytes) are andenhanceneuronproductioninhippocampal Author contributions: L.S., A.S., H.P., and S.T. designed progenitors. (B) At the molecular level, Lhx2 research; L.S., A.S., A.S.S., B.M., H.P., and M.P. performed not generated during the neurogenic functions as a “brake” on glia-producing pathways research; E.S.M., I.B., R.M.G., and L.J.R. contributed new phase. This raises the question of how within the progenitors. A major target of these reagents/analytic tools; L.S., A.S., A.S.S., B.M., H.P., gliogenesis is suppressed until neuro- pathways is the GFAP gene, which is activated by the M.P., and S.T. analyzed data; and L.S., A.S., H.P., and genesis is complete. The molecular action of the Notch-Nfia pathway. Lhx2 overrides this S.T. wrote the paper. players that prevent the generation of activation, suppressing glia production until neuron The authors declare no conflict of interest. astrocytes during the neurogenic period production is complete. Freely available online through the PNAS open remain unknown. access option. In this study, we report a unique role This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. for a protein transcription factor belonging to the LIM-homeo- 1L.S. and A.S. contributed equally to this work. domain (Lhx) family, Lhx2: this protein acts as a gene switch in 2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]. suppressing astrogliogenesis in the developing hippocampus, See full research article on page E265 of www.pnas.org. which is a cerebral cortical structure critical for learning and Cite this Author Summary as: PNAS 10.1073/pnas.1101109108. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1101109108 PNAS | July 5, 2011 | vol. 108 | no. 27 | 10937–10938 Downloaded by guest on September 27, 2021 normally give rise to neurons. DNA constructs were tagged with toward late gestation, which provides a mechanism for the re- a GFP marker so that electroporated cells could be identified. lease of the suppression, signaling the transition from neuro- These were examined by immunohistochemistry for neuronal- genesis to astrogliogenesis (Fig. P1A). and astrocyte-specific markers in sections of the Lhx2 has a fundamental role in the early development of electroporated brain. the brain, that of a “selector gene” for cerebral cortical fate. Using this procedure, we discovered that loss of Lhx2 causes In the absence of Lhx2, the cortical primordium (hippocampus a dramatic and premature increase in astrogliogenesis (base- and neocortex) is lost at the expense of alternative noncortical line levels of 26% increased to 86% in the Cre electroporation fates (2). This is an early role for Lhx2, the critical period case, and those of 35% increased to 80% in the dominant- which ends by E10.5, after which loss of Lhx2 does not cause negative construct electroporation case). Thus, loss of Lhx2 loss of the cortical primordium (2). However, even after this produces astrocytes prematurely from progenitors that would time, Lhx2 continues to be expressed in the progenitor cells of otherwise produce neurons. Even more striking was the finding fi the cerebral cortex, of which the hippocampus is one major that enhancement of Lhx2 levels by overexpression is suf cient component. Our study reveals a previously undescribed role for to suppress astrogliogenesis and prolong neurogenesis into Lhx2 as a regulator of the neuron-astrocyte cell fate switch the astrogliogenic phase. In WT mice that had reached E15, during hippocampal development. Notch signaling is also known overexpression of Lhx2 decreased the baseline level of 35% to have multiple roles in the telencephalic neuroepithelium, an astrogliogenesis to 10%. Overexpression at E17 decreased the 79% level of astrogliogenesis to 31%, similar to levels on E15. early role in maintaining proliferation of the progenitor pool, Therefore, Lhx2 is necessary and sufficient to enhance and and a later role in instructing astrogliogenesis (1). Interestingly, prolong neurogenesis by suppressing astrogliogenesis in the de- Notch and Lhx2 appear to have parallel early roles in main- “ ” veloping hippocampus (Fig. P1A). This raised the question of taining the proliferation and cortical identity of cortical pro- how Lhx2 suppresses pathways that lead to gliogenesis. genitors, respectively. In contrast, they play opposing roles in Activation of Notch signaling promotes astrogliogenesis via regulating the cell fate of the progeny arising from these pro- the transcription factor Nfia, which is necessary and sufficient for genitors, such that Notch promotes gliogenesis and Lhx2 sup- the commitment to the astrocytic cell fate (4). In the hippo- presses it. How the balance between these opposing players is campus, astrogliogenesis can be prematurely induced by over- controlled to generate the choreography of neurogenesis, fol- expressing constitutively active Notch or its target, Nfia. If, at the lowed by astrogliogenesis, remains an open question. same time as Notch or Nfia, we simultaneously overexpressed One final experiment revealed an unexpected spatial selec- Lhx2, we found that neurogenesis was restored. Lhx2 is a mem- tivity to this “glial-brake” function of Lhx2. When we inactivated ber of the transcription factor family of proteins, which means Lhx2 in the neocortex, neurons destined for different cortical that it can act as a master regulator, turning target genes on layers appeared to be produced normally despite loss of Lhx2 or off. We show that Lhx2 is able to repress expression of one function in the neocortical progenitors. This was surprising of the targets of Nfia, GFAP, which is one of the identifying because the two structures arise from a common primordium features of astrocytes. Removal of Lhx2 does not, however, and earlier studies examining astrogliogenic mechanisms had produce astrocytes if the Notch pathway is suppressed or if not uncovered region-specific functions of any molecular player.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Early Neuronal and Glial Fate Restriction of Embryonic Neural Stem Cells
    The Journal of Neuroscience, March 5, 2008 • 28(10):2551–2562 • 2551 Development/Plasticity/Repair Early Neuronal and Glial Fate Restriction of Embryonic Neural Stem Cells Delphine Delaunay,1,2 Katharina Heydon,1,2 Ana Cumano,3 Markus H. Schwab,4 Jean-Le´on Thomas,1,2 Ueli Suter,5 Klaus-Armin Nave,4 Bernard Zalc,1,2 and Nathalie Spassky1,2 1Inserm, Unite´ 711, 75013 Paris, France, 2Institut Fe´de´ratif de Recherche 70, Faculte´deMe´decine, Universite´ Pierre et Marie Curie, 75013 Paris, France, 3Inserm, Unite´ 668, Institut Pasteur, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France, 4Max-Planck-Institute of Experimental Medicine, D-37075 Goettingen, Germany, and 5Institute of Cell Biology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), ETH Ho¨nggerberg, CH-8093 Zu¨rich, Switzerland The question of how neurons and glial cells are generated during the development of the CNS has over time led to two alternative models: either neuroepithelial cells are capable of giving rise to neurons first and to glial cells at a later stage (switching model), or they are intrinsically committed to generate one or the other (segregating model). Using the developing diencephalon as a model and by selecting a subpopulation of ventricular cells, we analyzed both in vitro, using clonal analysis, and in vivo, using inducible Cre/loxP fate mapping, the fate of neuroepithelial and radial glial cells generated at different time points during embryonic development. We found that, during neurogenic periods [embryonic day 9.5 (E9.5) to 12.5], proteolipid protein ( plp)-expressing cells were lineage-restricted neuronal precursors, but later in embryogenesis, during gliogenic periods (E13.5 to early postnatal), plp-expressing cells were lineage-restricted glial precursors.
    [Show full text]
  • Notch-Signaling in Retinal Regeneration and Müller Glial Plasticity
    Notch-Signaling in Retinal Regeneration and Müller glial Plasticity DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Kanika Ghai, MS Neuroscience Graduate Studies Program The Ohio State University 2009 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Andy J Fischer, Advisor Dr. Heithem El-Hodiri Dr. Susan Cole Dr. Paul Henion Copyright by Kanika Ghai 2009 ABSTRACT Eye diseases such as blindness, age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy and glaucoma are highly prevalent in the developed world, especially in a rapidly aging population. These sight-threatening diseases all involve the progressive loss of cells from the retina, the light-sensing neural tissue that lines the back of the eye. Thus, developing strategies to replace dying retinal cells or prolonging neuronal survival is essential to preserving sight. In this regard, cell-based therapies hold great potential as a treatment for retinal diseases. One strategy is to stimulate cells within the retina to produce new neurons. This dissertation elucidates the properties of the primary support cell in the chicken retina, known as the Müller glia, which have recently been shown to possess stem-cell like properties, with the potential to form new neurons in damaged retinas. However, the mechanisms that govern this stem-cell like ability are less well understood. In order to better understand these properties, we analyze the role of one of the key developmental processes, i.e., the Notch-Signaling Pathway in regulating proliferative, neuroprotective and regenerative properties of Müller glia and bestow them with this plasticity.
    [Show full text]
  • Differential Timing and Coordination of Neurogenesis and Astrogenesis
    brain sciences Article Differential Timing and Coordination of Neurogenesis and Astrogenesis in Developing Mouse Hippocampal Subregions Allison M. Bond 1, Daniel A. Berg 1, Stephanie Lee 1, Alan S. Garcia-Epelboim 1, Vijay S. Adusumilli 1, Guo-li Ming 1,2,3,4 and Hongjun Song 1,2,3,5,* 1 Department of Neuroscience and Mahoney Institute for Neurosciences, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; [email protected] (A.M.B.); [email protected] (D.A.B.); [email protected] (S.L.); [email protected] (A.S.G.-E.); [email protected] (V.S.A.); [email protected] (G.-l.M.) 2 Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA 3 Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA 4 Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA 5 The Epigenetics Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 19 October 2020; Accepted: 24 November 2020; Published: 26 November 2020 Abstract: Neocortical development has been extensively studied and therefore is the basis of our understanding of mammalian brain development. One fundamental principle of neocortical development is that neurogenesis and gliogenesis are temporally segregated processes. However, it is unclear how neurogenesis and gliogenesis are coordinated in non-neocortical regions of the cerebral cortex, such as the hippocampus, also known as the archicortex. Here, we show that the timing of neurogenesis and astrogenesis in the Cornu Ammonis (CA) 1 and CA3 regions of mouse hippocampus mirrors that of the neocortex; neurogenesis occurs embryonically, followed by astrogenesis during early postnatal development.
    [Show full text]
  • Postnatal Neurogenesis and Gliogenesis in the Olfactory Bulb from NG2-Expressing Progenitors of the Subventricular Zone
    10530 • The Journal of Neuroscience, November 17, 2004 • 24(46):10530–10541 Development/Plasticity/Repair Postnatal Neurogenesis and Gliogenesis in the Olfactory Bulb from NG2-Expressing Progenitors of the Subventricular Zone Adan Aguirre and Vittorio Gallo Center for Neuroscience Research, Children’s Research Institute, Children’s National Medical Center, Washington, DC 20010 We used a 2Ј,3Ј-cyclic nucleotide 3Ј-phosphodiesterase (CNP)–enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) transgenic mouse to study postnatal subventricular zone (SVZ) progenitor fate, with a focus on the olfactory bulb (OB). The postnatal OB of the CNP–EGFP mouse contained EGFP ϩ interneurons and oligodendrocytes. In the anterior SVZ, the majority of EGFP ϩ progenitors were NG2 ϩ. These NG2 ϩ/EGFP ϩ progenitors expressed the OB interneuron marker Er81, the neuroblast markers doublecortin (DC) and Distalless-related homeobox (DLX), or the oligodendrocyte progenitor marker Nkx2.2. In the rostral migratory stream (RMS), EGFP ϩ cells displayed a migrating phenotype. A fraction of these cells were either NG2 Ϫ/Er81 ϩ/DC ϩ/DLX ϩ or NG2 ϩ/Nkx2.2 ϩ. DiI (1,1Ј-dioctadecyl-3,3,3Ј,3Ј- tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate) injection into the lateral ventricle (LV) of early postnatal mice demonstrated that NG2ϩ/ EGFP ϩ progenitors migrate from the SVZ through the RMS into the OB. Moreover, fluorescence-activated cell-sorting-purified NG2ϩ/ CNP–EGFP ϩ or NG2 ϩ/␤-actin–enhanced yellow fluorescent protein-positive (EYFP ϩ) progenitors transplanted into the early postnatal LV displayed extensive rostral and caudal migration. EYFP ϩ or EGFP ϩ graft-derived cells within the RMS were DLX ϩ/Er81 ϩ or Nkx2.2 ϩ, migrated to the OB, and differentiated to interneurons and oligodendrocytes.
    [Show full text]
  • Microglia Enhance Neurogenesis and Oligodendrogenesis in the Early Postnatal Subventricular Zone
    The Journal of Neuroscience, February 5, 2014 • 34(6):2231–2243 • 2231 Development/Plasticity/Repair Microglia Enhance Neurogenesis and Oligodendrogenesis in the Early Postnatal Subventricular Zone Yukari Shigemoto-Mogami,1 Kazue Hoshikawa,1 James E. Goldman,2 Yuko Sekino,1 and Kaoru Sato1 1Laboratory of Neuropharmacology, Division of Pharmacology, National Institute of Health Sciences, Tokyo 158-8501, Japan, and 2Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York 10032 Although microglia have long been considered as brain resident immune cells, increasing evidence suggests that they also have physio- logical roles in the development of the normal CNS. In this study, we found large numbers of activated microglia in the forebrain subventricular zone (SVZ) of the rat from P1 to P10. Pharmacological suppression of the activation, which produces a decrease in levels of a number of proinflammatory cytokines (i.e., IL-1␤, IL-6, TNF-␣, and IFN-␥) significantly inhibited neurogenesis and oligodendro- genesis in the SVZ. In vitro neurosphere assays reproduced the enhancement of neurogenesis and oligodendrogenesis by activated microglia and showed that the cytokines revealed the effects complementarily. These results suggest that activated microglia accumulate in the early postnatal SVZ and that they enhance neurogenesis and oligodendrogenesis via released cytokines. Key words: cytokine; microglia; neurogenesis; neurosphere; oligodendrogenesis; subventricular zone Introduction SVZ
    [Show full text]
  • Concerted Control of Gliogenesis by Inr/TOR and FGF Signalling in the Drosophila Post-Embryonic Brain Amélie Avet-Rochex1, Aamna K
    RESEARCH ARTICLE 2763 Development 139, 2763-2772 (2012) doi:10.1242/dev.074179 © 2012. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd Concerted control of gliogenesis by InR/TOR and FGF signalling in the Drosophila post-embryonic brain Amélie Avet-Rochex1, Aamna K. Kaul1, Ariana P. Gatt1, Helen McNeill2 and Joseph M. Bateman1,* SUMMARY Glial cells are essential for the development and function of the nervous system. In the mammalian brain, vast numbers of glia of several different functional types are generated during late embryonic and early foetal development. However, the molecular cues that instruct gliogenesis and determine glial cell type are poorly understood. During post-embryonic development, the number of glia in the Drosophila larval brain increases dramatically, potentially providing a powerful model for understanding gliogenesis. Using glial-specific clonal analysis we find that perineural glia and cortex glia proliferate extensively through symmetric cell division in the post-embryonic brain. Using pan-glial inhibition and loss-of-function clonal analysis we find that Insulin-like receptor (InR)/Target of rapamycin (TOR) signalling is required for the proliferation of perineural glia. Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signalling is also required for perineural glia proliferation and acts synergistically with the InR/TOR pathway. Cortex glia require InR in part, but not downstream components of the TOR pathway, for proliferation. Moreover, cortex glia absolutely require FGF signalling, such that inhibition of the FGF pathway almost completely blocks the generation of cortex glia. Neuronal expression of the FGF receptor ligand Pyramus is also required for the generation of cortex glia, suggesting a mechanism whereby neuronal FGF expression coordinates neurogenesis and cortex gliogenesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Notch Signaling, Brain Development, and Human Disease
    0031-3998/05/5705-0104R PEDIATRIC RESEARCH Vol. 57, No. 5, Pt 2, 2005 Copyright © 2005 International Pediatric Research Foundation, Inc. Printed in U.S.A. Notch Signaling, Brain Development, and Human Disease JOSEPH L. LASKY AND HONG WU University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, Los Angeles, California, 90025 ABSTRACT The Notch signaling pathway is central to a wide array of summarizes what is currently known about the role of the Notch developmental processes in a number of organ systems, includ- pathway in neural stem cells, gliogenesis, learning and memory, ing hematopoiesis, somitogenesis, vasculogenesis, and neuro- and neurologic disease. (Pediatr Res 57: 104R–109R, 2005) genesis. These processes involve maintenance of stem cell self- renewal, proliferation, specification of cell fate or differentiation, Abbreviations and apoptosis. Recent studies have led to the recognition of the FCD, focal cortical dysplasia role of the Notch pathway in early neurodevelopment, learning, ICD, intracellular domain and memory, as well as late-life neurodegeneration. This review PS1, presenilin1 The formation of the mammalian nervous system takes place interacts with Notch ligands, such as Delta or Serrate (in via a number of developmental steps. All phases of brain Drosophila), on an adjacent cell (Fig. 1). This interaction development involve the recurrent themes of induction, cell triggers two proteolytic events culminating in the release of the proliferation, cell fate determination (differentiation), cell Notch ICD. The free intracellular fragment then translocates to movement (migration), cell process formation, and targeting the nucleus where it binds to the transcriptional regulator CSL (synapse formation) (1).
    [Show full text]
  • Clonal Analysis of Gliogenesis in the Cerebral Cortex Reveals Stochastic Expansion of Glia and Cell Autonomous Responses to Egfr Dosage
    cells Article Clonal Analysis of Gliogenesis in the Cerebral Cortex Reveals Stochastic Expansion of Glia and Cell Autonomous Responses to Egfr Dosage 1, 2, 1, 3 Xuying Zhang y, Christine V. Mennicke y, Guanxi Xiao y, Robert Beattie , Mansoor A. Haider 2 , Simon Hippenmeyer 3 and H. Troy Ghashghaei 1,* 1 Department of Molecular Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA; [email protected] (X.Z.); [email protected] (G.X.) 2 Department of Mathematics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA; [email protected] (C.V.M.); [email protected] (M.A.H.) 3 Institute of Science and Technology Austria, Am Campus 1, 3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria; [email protected] (R.B.); [email protected] (S.H.) * Correspondence: [email protected] These authors contributed equally to this work. y Received: 16 November 2020; Accepted: 7 December 2020; Published: 11 December 2020 Abstract: Development of the nervous system undergoes important transitions, including one from neurogenesis to gliogenesis which occurs late during embryonic gestation. Here we report on clonal analysis of gliogenesis in mice using Mosaic Analysis with Double Markers (MADM) with quantitative and computational methods. Results reveal that developmental gliogenesis in the cerebral cortex occurs in a fraction of earlier neurogenic clones, accelerating around E16.5, and giving rise to both astrocytes and oligodendrocytes. Moreover, MADM-based genetic deletion of the epidermal growth factor receptor (Egfr) in gliogenic clones revealed that Egfr is cell autonomously required for gliogenesis in the mouse dorsolateral cortices. A broad range in the proliferation capacity, symmetry of clones, and competitive advantage of MADM cells was evident in clones that contained one cellular lineage with double dosage of Egfr relative to their environment, while their sibling Egfr-null cells failed to generate glia.
    [Show full text]
  • All in the Family: Proneural Bhlh Genes and Neuronal Diversity Nicholas E
    © 2018. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Development (2018) 145, dev159426. doi:10.1242/dev.159426 REVIEW All in the family: proneural bHLH genes and neuronal diversity Nicholas E. Baker1,* and Nadean L. Brown2,* ABSTRACT lethal of scute [lsc,orl(1)sc] and asense (ase) – that are responsible Proneural basic Helix-Loop-Helix (bHLH) proteins are required for for development of much of the Drosophila CNS and PNS (Cubas neuronal determination and the differentiation of most neural et al., 1991; Garcia-Bellido and de Celis, 2009). Expression of these precursor cells. These transcription factors are expressed in vastly proneural genes defines regions of ectoderm with neurogenic divergent organisms, ranging from sponges to primates. Here, we competence, such that their default fate will be that of neural review proneural bHLH gene evolution and function in the Drosophila precursors unless diverted to another fate, for example by Notch and vertebrate nervous systems, arguing that the Drosophila gene signaling (Knust and Campos-Ortega, 1989; Simpson, 1990). ac, sc atonal provides a useful platform for understanding proneural gene and lsc are proneural genes, conferring proneural competence that structure and regulation. We also discuss how functional equivalency may or may not lead to neuronal determination in every cell, experiments using distinct proneural genes can reveal how proneural whereas ase is a neural precursor gene, expressed after the neural gene duplication and divergence are interwoven with neuronal fate decision has been made. It has been suggested that the complexity. vertebrate homologs of these genes are expressed in ectoderm with previously acquired neural character, and therefore are not true KEY WORDS: bHLH gene, Neural development, Neurogenesis, proneural genes (Bertrand et al., 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Proneural Genes and the Specification of Neural Cell Types
    REVIEWS PRONEURAL GENES AND THE SPECIFICATION OF NEURAL CELL TYPES Nicolas Bertrand*, Diogo S. Castro* and François Guillemot Certain morphological, physiological and molecular characteristics are shared by all neurons. However, despite these similarities, neurons constitute the most diverse cell population of any organism. Recently, considerable attention has been focused on identifying the molecular mechanisms that underlie this cellular diversity. Parallel studies in Drosophila and vertebrates have revealed that proneural genes are key regulators of neurogenesis, coordinating the acquisition of a generic neuronal fate and of specific subtype identities that are appropriate for the location and time of neuronal generation. These studies reveal that, in spite of differences between invertebrate and vertebrate neural lineages, Drosophila and vertebrate proneural genes have remarkably similar roles. BASIC HELIX–LOOP–HELIX Building a nervous system involves the production of a ‘proneural genes’,which encode transcription factors of A structural motif that is present vast array of neuronal and glial cell types that must be the BASIC HELIX–LOOP–HELIX (bHLH) class, are both neces- in many transcription factors, produced in the correct numbers and at appropriate sary and sufficient, in the context of the ectoderm, which is characterized by two positions. The uniform epithelial sheath that constitutes to initiate the development of neuronal lineages and to α-helices separated by a loop. The helices mediate the primordium of the nervous system in invertebrate promote the generation of progenitors that are com- dimerization, and the adjacent and vertebrate embryos consists of cells that have the mitted to differentiation. Importantly, proneural genes basic region is required for DNA potential to generate both neurons and glia.
    [Show full text]
  • Glial Cell Fate Specification by Hes5
    Development 127, 2515-2522 (2000) 2515 Printed in Great Britain © The Company of Biologists Limited 2000 DEV4317 Glial cell fate specification modulated by the bHLH gene Hes5 in mouse retina Masato Hojo1,2, Toshiyuki Ohtsuka1, Nobuo Hashimoto2, Gérald Gradwohl3, François Guillemot3 and Ryoichiro Kageyama1,* 1Institute for Virus Research, Kyoto University and 2Department of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan 3Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, CNRS/INSERM/Université Louis Pasteur/Collège de France, 67404 Illkirch, CU de Strasbourg, France *Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]) Accepted 29 March; published on WWW 23 May 2000 SUMMARY Neurons and glial cells differentiate from common retrovirus significantly increased the population of glial precursors. Whereas the gene glial cells missing (gcm) cells at the expense of neurons. Conversely, Hes5-deficient determines the glial fate in Drosophila, current data about retina showed 30-40% decrease of Müller glial cell number the expression patterns suggest that, in mammals, gcm without affecting cell survival. These results indicate that homologues are unlikely to regulate gliogenesis. Here, we Hes5 modulates glial cell fate specification in mouse retina. found that, in mouse retina, the bHLH gene Hes5 was specifically expressed by differentiating Müller glial cells Key words: bHLH, Glial specification, Hes5, Müller glia, Retina, and that misexpression of Hes5 with recombinant Mouse, Cell fate INTRODUCTION homologues have been characterized (Gcm1/Gcma and Gcm2/Gcmb) (Akiyama et al., 1996; Kim et al., 1998; Retina provides a powerful model system to investigate the Kanemura et al., 1999; Reifegerste et al., 1999) and it was mechanisms of cell fate decision in mammalian central nervous shown that one of them, Gcm1, can substitute functionally for system.
    [Show full text]
  • Neural Stem Cells: What Happens When They Go Viral?
    viruses Review Neural Stem Cells: What Happens When They Go Viral? Yashika S. Kamte, Manisha N. Chandwani, Alexa C. Michaels and Lauren A. O’Donnell * Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Duquesne University, 600 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15282, USA; [email protected] (Y.S.K.); [email protected] (M.N.C.); [email protected] (A.C.M.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-412-396-5133 Abstract: Viruses that infect the central nervous system (CNS) are associated with developmental abnormalities as well as neuropsychiatric and degenerative conditions. Many of these viruses such as Zika virus (ZIKV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), and herpes simplex virus (HSV) demonstrate tropism for neural stem cells (NSCs). NSCs are the multipotent progenitor cells of the brain that have the ability to form neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes. Viral infections often alter the function of NSCs, with profound impacts on the growth and repair of the brain. There are a wide spectrum of effects on NSCs, which differ by the type of virus, the model system, the cell types studied, and the age of the host. Thus, it is a challenge to predict and define the consequences of interactions between viruses and NSCs. The purpose of this review is to dissect the mechanisms by which viruses can affect survival, proliferation, and differentiation of NSCs. This review also sheds light on the contribution of key antiviral cytokines in the impairment of NSC activity during a viral infection, revealing a complex interplay between NSCs, viruses, and the immune system. Keywords: neural stem cells; viruses; proliferation; survival; neurogenesis; differentiation; gliogenesis; cell death; cytokines Citation: Kamte, Y.S.; Chandwani, M.N.; Michaels, A.C.; O’Donnell, L.A.
    [Show full text]