DOCSLIB.ORG

Human Rights and Democracy in the World Report on EU Action in 2011 © European Union, 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Human Rights and Democracy in the World Report on EU Action in 2011 © European Union, 2012 Human rights and democracy in the world Report on EU Action in 2011 © European Union, 2012 This report is available online at http://eeas.europa.eu Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged Cover picture: © Wally Nell/ZUMA Press/Corbis A great deal of additional information on the European Union is also available on the Internet at : http://ec.europa.eu / http://www.consilium.europa.eu / http://www.europarl.europa.eu Published by the European External Action Service, June 2012 HUMAN RIGHTS AND DEMOCRACY IN THE WORLD: REPORT IN EU ACTION IN 2011 1 Table of contents 1. Overview ............................................................................................................................. 7 2. EU instruments and initiatives in non-EU countries .................................................. 15 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 15 2.1. EU guidelines on human rights and International Humanitarian Law (IHL) . 15 2.2. Human rights dialogues and consultations .......................................................... 16 2.3. Council decisions and crisis management ............................................................ 18 2.4. Démarches and declarations .................................................................................. 20 2.5. Human rights clauses in cooperation agreements with third countries ........... 20 2.6. The European Neighbourhood Policy ................................................................. 22 2.7. Activities funded under the European Initiative for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR) ...................................................................................................... 26 2.8. The review of EU human rights policy ................................................................ 29 3. Thematic Issues ................................................................................................................ 32 Thematic issues related to EU Guidelines .................................................................... 32 3.1. The death penalty .................................................................................................... 32 3.2. Torture and other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment .. 35 3.3. Rights of the child ................................................................................................... 38 3.4. Children and armed conflict .................................................................................. 40 3.5. Human rights defenders ......................................................................................... 42 3.6. Human rights of women ........................................................................................ 45 3.7. Women, peace and security ................................................................................... 48 3.8. Promoting compliance with International Humanitarian Law ......................... 55 Other thematic issues ...................................................................................................... 61 3.9. The ICC and the fight against impunity ............................................................... 61 3.10. Human rights and terrorism .................................................................................. 65 3.11. Freedom of expression including 'new media' .................................................... 67 3.12. Freedom of association and assembly .................................................................. 69 3.13. Freedom of thought, conscience and religion or belief ..................................... 72 3.14. Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Intersex Persons......................................... 75 3.15. Human rights and business, including CSR ......................................................... 78 3.16. Democracy support ................................................................................................ 82 3.17. Election support ...................................................................................................... 85 3.18. Election observation missions (EOMs) ............................................................... 86 3.19. Election expert missions (EEMs) ......................................................................... 89 3.20. Electoral assistance (EA) ....................................................................................... 90 3.21. European Endowment for Democracy ............................................................... 93 3.22. Work with Parliaments worldwide........................................................................ 93 3.23. Economic, social and cultural rights ..................................................................... 96 3.24. Asylum, migration, refugees and displaced persons ........................................... 98 3.25. Trafficking in human beings ................................................................................ 103 3.26. Racism, xenophobia, non-discrimination and respect for diversity ............... 107 3.27. Rights of persons belonging to minorities ......................................................... 110 2 3.28. Rights of persons with disabilities ...................................................................... 113 3.29. Indigenous issues .................................................................................................. 115 4. EU action in international forums ............................................................................... 119 4.1. 66th session of the UN General Assembly ....................................................... 119 4.2. The United Nations Human Rights Council ..................................................... 121 4.3. The Council of Europe ........................................................................................ 127 4.4. The Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) ............. 129 5. Country and regional issues .......................................................................................... 131 5.1. EU candidate countries and potential candidates ............................................. 131 5.1.1. Turkey .......................................................................................................... 131 5.1.2. Western Balkans ......................................................................................... 133 5.1.3. Croatia .......................................................................................................... 134 5.1.4. The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia ........................................ 135 5.1.5. Montenegro ................................................................................................. 137 5.1.6. Albania ......................................................................................................... 139 5.1.7. Bosnia and Herzegovina ............................................................................ 141 5.1.8. Serbia ............................................................................................................ 142 5.1.9. Kosovo......................................................................................................... 143 5.2. Countries of the European Neighbourhood Policy ......................................... 146 5.2.1. Eastern Partnership .................................................................................... 146 5.2.2. South Caucasus (regional) ......................................................................... 147 5.2.3. Armenia ....................................................................................................... 147 5.2.4. Azerbaijan .................................................................................................... 149 5.2.5. Georgia ........................................................................................................ 150 5.2.6. Belarus .......................................................................................................... 152 5.2.7. Republic of Moldova .................................................................................. 154 5.2.8. Ukraine ......................................................................................................... 157 5.2.9. Union for the Mediterranean .................................................................... 159 5.2.10. Egypt .......................................................................................................... 159 5.2.11. Israel ........................................................................................................... 162 5.2.12. Occupied Palestinian Territory ............................................................... 164 5.2.13. Jordan ......................................................................................................... 165 5.2.14. Lebanon ..................................................................................................... 167 5.2.15. Syria ............................................................................................................ 168 5.2.16. Tunisia ........................................................................................................ 170 5.2.17. Algeria ........................................................................................................ 173 5.2.18. Morocco....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Iran Human Rights Defenders Report 2019/20
    IRAN HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS REPORT 2019/20 Table of Contents Definition of terms and concepts 4 Introduction 7 LAWYERS Amirsalar Davoudi 9 Payam Derafshan 10 Mohammad Najafi 11 Nasrin Sotoudeh 12 CIVIL ACTIVISTS Zartosht Ahmadi-Ragheb 13 Rezvaneh Ahmad-Khanbeigi 14 Shahnaz Akmali 15 Atena Daemi 16 Golrokh Ebrahimi-Irayi 17 Farhad Meysami 18 Narges Mohammadi 19 Mohammad Nourizad 20 Arsham Rezaii 21 Arash Sadeghi 22 Saeed Shirzad 23 Imam Ali Popular Student Relief Society 24 TEACHERS Esmaeil Abdi 26 Mahmoud Beheshti-Langroudi 27 Mohammad Habibi 28 MINORITY RIGHTS ACTIVISTS Mary Mohammadi 29 Zara Mohammadi 30 ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVISTS Persian Wildlife Heritage Foundation 31 Workers rights ACTIVISTS Marzieh Amiri 32 This report has been prepared by Iran Human Rights (IHR) Esmaeil Bakhshi 33 Sepideh Gholiyan 34 Leila Hosseinzadeh 35 IHR is an independent non-partisan NGO based in Norway. Abolition of the Nasrin Javadi 36 death penalty, supporting human rights defenders and promoting the rule of law Asal Mohammadi 37 constitute the core of IHR’s activities. Neda Naji 38 Atefeh Rangriz 39 Design and layout: L Tarighi Hassan Saeedi 40 © Iran Human Rights, 2020 Rasoul Taleb-Moghaddam 41 WOMEN’S RIGHTS ACTIVISTS Raha Ahmadi 42 Raheleh Ahmadi 43 Monireh Arabshahi 44 Yasaman Aryani 45 Mojgan Keshavarz 46 Saba Kordafshari 47 Nedaye Zanan Iran 48 www.iranhr.net Recommendations 49 Endnotes 50 : @IHRights | : @iranhumanrights | : @humanrightsiran Definition of Terms & Concepts PRISONS Evin Prison: Iran’s most notorious prison where Wards 209, 240 and 241, which have solitary cells called security“suites” and are controlled by the Ministry of Intelligence (MOIS): Ward 209 Evin: dedicated to security prisoners under the jurisdiction of the MOIS.
    [Show full text]
  • Reporters Without Borders TV5 Monde Prize 2015 Nominees
    Reporters Without Borders ­ TV5 Monde Prize 2015 Nominees Journalist Category Mahmoud Abou Zeid, aka Shawkan (Egypt) “I am a photojournalist, not a criminal,” Shawkan wrote from Tora prison in February. “My ​ ​ ​ indefinite detention is psychologically unbearable. Not even animals would survive in these conditions." ​ Shawkan is an Egyptian freelance photojournalist who has been in pre­trial detention for more than 760 days. He was arrested on 14 August 2013 while providing the US photojournalism agency Demotix and the US digital media company Corbis with coverage of ​ ​ ​ ​ the violence used to disperse demonstrations by deposed President Mohamed Morsi’s supporters in Rabiaa Al­Awadiya Square. Three journalists were killed that day in connection with their work Aged 28, Shawkan covered developments in Egypt closely from Mubarak’s fall to Morsi’s overthrow and on several occasions obtained striking shots of the popular unrest. His detention became illegal in August of this year because, under Egyptian law, pre­trial detention may surpass two years only in exceptional cases. Few people in Egypt have ever been held pending trial as long as him. A date has finally been set for the start of his trial, 12 December 2015, when he will be prosecuted before a Cairo criminal court along with more than 700 other defendants including members of the Muslim Brotherhood, which was declared a terrorist organization in December 2013. Many charges have been brought against him without any evidence, according to his lawyer, Karim Abdelrady. The most serious include joining a banned organization [the Muslim Brotherhood], murder, attacking the security forces and possession of weapons.
    [Show full text]
  • Bhasha Bhavana (Institute of Language and Literature)
    OBJECTIVES AND OUTCOMES Bhasha Bhavana (Institute of Language and Literature) Department of Assamese Course Code 152 CERTIFICATE OF PROFICIENCY EXAMINATION IN ASSAMESE LANGUAGE CERTIFICATE OF PROFICIENCY- A TWO YEAR COURSE Programme objectives: Language departments of Bhasha-Bhavana offer 2 years Certificate Course for non-native speakers of that particular language. The primary objective of this course is to introduce various literature and culture of different communities and states via languages. Course Objectives: The Certificate Course in Assamese has been designed to make non-Assamese learners adept in reading, understanding, speaking and writing. To make the learners skilled in Assamese the basic grammar and prose- poetry has been introduced in two papers- (i) grammar and (ii) texts. The third paper is based on oral skill or language speaking practice. Programme Specific Objectives: The Certificate Course in Assamese is a course for non-native speakers and has been planned to make the learners attracted for learning, reading, understanding, writing and speaking Assamese and translating from Assamese to their respective mother languages. M.A. in comparative literature Course Objectives: To introduce Assamese language, literature & culture, its structure, genres, characteristics to the Comparative Literature MA students, who are non-native speakers of Assamese is the objective of this course. Programme Specific Objectives: To make the students skilled in understanding, reading, writing, speaking and also translating from Assamese is intended after completion of this course. The course has four papers in each semester and each paper has four section or groups of contents including 20% marks for internal assessment. The First Paper is of Introduction to the history of Assamese language and languages of Assam, Structure of Assamese, Writing and Reading Assamese and Spoken Assamese.
    [Show full text]
  • Prémio Sakharov Para a Liberdade De Pensamento
    PRÉMIO SAKHAROV PARA A LIBERDADE DE PENSAMENTO uma edição: www.carloscoelho.eu por Carlos Coelho Deputado ao Parlamento Europeu, Membro da Comissão das Liberdades Cívicas, Justiça e Assuntos Internos PRÉMIO SAKHAROV PARA A LIBERDADE DE PENSAMENTO Nesta pequena edição divulgo o Prémio Sakharov que é um dos instrumentos da União Europeia para promover os Direitos do Homem no Mundo. O Prémio Sakharov recompensa personalidades excepcio- nais que lutam contra a intolerância, o fanatismo e a opres- são. A exemplo de Andrei Sakharov, os laureados com este Pré- mio são ou foram exemplos da coragem que é necessária para defender os Direitos do Homem e a Liberdade de ex- pressão. 2 3 E QUEM FOI ANDREI SAKHAROV? Prémio Nobel da Paz em 1975, o físico russo Andrei Dmitrievitch Sakharov (1921-1989) foi, antes de mais, o inventor da bomba de hidrogénio. O QUE É Preocupado com as consequências dos seus trabalhos para o futuro da humanidade, O PRÉMIO SAKHAROV? procurou despertar a consciência do perigo da corrida ao armamento nuclear. Obteve um êxito parcial com a assinatura do Tratado O “Prémio Sakharov para a Liberdade de Pensamento” é contra os Ensaios Nucleares em 1963. atribuído todos os anos pelo Parlamento Europeu. Criado em 1988, reconhece e distingue personalidades ou entidades Considerado na URSS como um dissidente que se esforçam por defender os Direitos Humanos e as com ideias subversivas, cria, nos anos setenta, liberdades fundamentais. um Comité para a defesa dos direitos do Homem e para a defesa das vítimas políticas. No dia 10 de Dezembro (ou na data mais próxima), o Os seus esforços viriam a ser coroados com o Parlamento Europeu entrega o seu Prémio no valor de Prémio Nobel da Paz em 1975.
    [Show full text]
  • Nowruz Action 2020
    Nowruz Action کارزار نوروز new day”) is an ancient holiday celebrated on the first day of“) نوروز The Iranian holiday Nowruz spring in the northern hemisphere to welcome in the new year. On this Nowruz we want to remember several courageous prisoners of conscience and prisoners held for politically motivated reasons in Iran with Nowruz greetings. We ask you to send cards with simple Nowruz greetings You can say “thinking of you at Nowruz time” or نوروز مبارک ”such as “Nowruz mobarak “hoping you are well.” You may send a greeting in either English or Farsi (Persian) but please do not mention Amnesty International or specifics of the recipient’s case. Please also refrain from mentioning the political situation, human rights or U.S.-Iran relations. We suggest sending cards with pictures of landscapes, spring flowers or the like, in keeping with the spirit of the holiday and the message of hope and renewal. Please do not choose cards that have pictures of people, and please do not use cards that depict bottles of wine or other alcoholic beverages or gambling. Traditional Nowruz celebrations include the preparation of a Haft Sin table which literally means the seven s’s. Seven items beginning with the Persian letter Sin (equivalent to the English s) and which represent spring time are set out. To honor this tradition, this year Amnesty International has selected seven cases, prisoners of conscience and prisoners held for politically motivated reasons, who have been identified by Amnesty International as “individuals at risk” and are therefore targeted for intensified campaigning.
    [Show full text]
  • Uhm Phd 9519439 R.Pdf
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality or the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely. event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor. MI48106·1346 USA 313!761-47oo 800:521-0600 Order Number 9519439 Discourses ofcultural identity in divided Bengal Dhar, Subrata Shankar, Ph.D. University of Hawaii, 1994 U·M·I 300N. ZeebRd. AnnArbor,MI48106 DISCOURSES OF CULTURAL IDENTITY IN DIVIDED BENGAL A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE DECEMBER 1994 By Subrata S.
    [Show full text]
  • Leto Imenovalnik Rodilnik Dajalnik 1988 Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela
    Leto Imenovalnik Rodilnik Dajalnik Nelson Rolihlahla Mandela Nelsona Rolihlahle Mandele Nelsonu Rolihlahli Mandeli 1988 Anatolij Marčenko Anatolija Marčenka Anatoliju Marčenku 1989 Aleksander Dubček Aleksandra Dubčka Aleksandru Dubčku 1990 Aung San Su Či Aung San Su Či Aung San Su Či 1991 Adem Demaçi Adema Demaçija Ademu Demaçiju (gibanje) Matere z Majskega Mater z Majskega trga (gibanja Materi z Majskega trga (gibanju 1992 trga (Madres de Plaza de Madres de Plaza de Mayo) Madres de Plaza de Mayo) Mayo) 1993 Oslobođenje Oslobođenja Oslobođenju 1994 Taslima Nasrin (ž) Taslime Nasrin Taslimi Nasrin 1995 Lejla Zana (ž) Lejle Zana Lejli Zana 1996 Wei Jingsheng (m) Wei Jingshenga Wei Jingshengu 1997 Salima Ghezali (ž) Salime Ghezali Salimi Ghezali 1998 Ibrahim Rugova Ibrahima Rugove Ibrahimu Rugovi 1999 Xanana Gusmão (m) Xanane Gusmãa Xanani Gusmãu 2000 (gibanje) ¡BASTA YA! gibanja Basta Ya gibanju Basta Ya Izat Ghazavi (m) Izata Ghazavija Izatu Ghazaviju 2001 Nurit Peled-Elhanan (ž) Nurit Peled-Elhanan Nurit Peled-Elhanan dom Zacarias Kamwenho (m) dom Zacariasa Kamwenha dom Zacariasu Kamwenhu Oswalda Joséja Payája 2002 Oswaldo José Payá Sardiñas Oswaldu Joséju Payáju Sardiñasu Sardiñasa generalni sekretar Združenih 2003 narodov Kofi Anan in celotno Kofija Anana Kofiju Ananu osebje Združenih narodov Belorusko združenje 2004 Žane Litvine Žani Litvini novinarjev (Žana Litvina) (gibanje) Dame v belem Dam v belem Damam v belem (Damas de Blanco) 2005 (gibanja Damas de Blanco) (gibanju Damas de Blanco) Hauva Ibrahim (ž) Hauve Ibrahim Hauvi Ibrahim
    [Show full text]
  • Binary Framings, Islam and Struggle for Women's Empowerment In
    Feminist Dissent Binary Framings, Islam and Struggle for Women’s Empowerment in Bangladesh Sohela Nazneen* Address *Correspondence: [[email protected]] Abstract In this paper, I investigate how binary framings of women’s identity have influenced struggles for women’s rights and the interpretations of the relationship between Islam and women’s empowerment in Bangladesh. These binary framings position women at opposite ends by dividing them between ‘Muslim/religious/moral/authentic/traditional’ or ‘Bengali/ secular/immoral/Westernised/ modern’. I trace the particular genealogies of these binary constructs which emerged during specific historical junctures and are influenced by the shifts in regional and international Peer review: This article politics. Drawing on primary research with women in religious political has been subject to a double blind peer review parties and women’s movement actors and newspaper reports, I provide process an account of how binary framings have been used by the Islamist actors and the counter framings used by the feminists to make claims over the state. I show how these framings have influenced the politics of © Copyright: The Authors. This article is representation of gender equality concerns, and reflect on what this means issued under the terms of the Creative Commons for possibilities of women’s empowerment and strategies for resistance. Attribution Non- Commercial Share Alike License, which permits use and redistribution of the work provided that Keywords: Bangladesh, women’s empowerment, gender, Islam, Hefazat the original author and source are credited, the work is not used for commercial purposes and that any derivative works are madentroduction available under the same license terms.
    [Show full text]
  • I DIRITTI UMANI ALLA RIBALTA Pubblicazione Sul Premio Sacharov Edita Dal Parlamento Europeo E' Stato Pubblicato a Cura Del Parla
    I DIRITTI UMANI ALLA RIBALTA Pubblicazione sul premio Sacharov edita dal Parlamento Europeo E' stato pubblicato a cura del Parlamento europeo un opuscolo sul premio Sacharov 2011. L'edizione, di agevole lettura, propone un excursus sugli individui e le organizzazioni cui dal 1988 ad oggi è stato assegnato il premio, per poi incentrare l'attenzione sui premiati 2011: Asmaa Mahfouz (Egitto), Ahmed al-Zubair Ahmed al-Sanusi (Libia), Razan Zaitouneh (Siria), Ali Farzat (Siria), Mohamed Bouazizi (Tunisia), in considerazione del ruolo decisivo svolto da costoro nella cosiddetta “primavera araba” vissuta dai paesi del nord Africa nel corso dell'anno. Dal 1988, il Parlamento europeo conferisce ogni anno il « Premio Sacharov per la libertà di pensiero » per onorare, personalità o vvero organizzazioni che si sono distinte per il loro impegno a favore dei diritti dell’uomo, delle libertà fondamentali e contro l’oppressione e l’ingiustizia. Andrej Sacharov (1921–1989), fisico membro dell’Accademia delle Scienze, dissidente e premio Nobel per la pace nel 1975. La sua figura ha assunto un certo rilievo non solo perchè egli si impegnava concretamente per la liberazione di dissidenti nel proprio paese, ma affrontava nei suoi scritti anche il rapporto fra scienza e società, coesistenza pacifica e libertà di pensiero. Sacharov è diventato quindi a livello mondiale il simbolo della lotta contro la negazione dei diritti fondamentali. Nello spirito di Sacharov, tutte le personalità che hanno finora ricevuto il premio a lui intitolato testimoniano il grande coraggio, per difendere i diritti dell’uomo e per rivendicarne la validità universale. Quasi sempre il loro impegno per la dignità della persona umana ha comportato grandi sacrifici.
    [Show full text]
  • Odebrecht Reinforce Offline Rights Violations: Guilty of Corruption
    USA: As many as two million people marched in protest in cities across the USA and around the world on 20 January, the day of President Trump’s inauguration. THE GAMBIA: President Jammeh tried to hold onto power despite losing the election, but was forced to stand down after popular and international pressure. JANUARY PAKISTAN: Five social media and blogging activists, outspoken campaigners against the Taliban and the military’s human YEAR IN REVIEW rights abuses were detained and tortured. DOMINICAN REPUBLIC: Determined to challenge systematic, large- scale corruption, the Green March Movement (Movimiento Marcha Verde) saw an estimated 200,000 people march on 22 January, the largest peaceful demonstration in the country’s history. january YEAR IN REVIEW 2 2017 opened with some notable civil society successes: when the Gambia’s when eight activists were arrested and charged for making allegedly anti- (see below). President Yahya Jammeh tried to cling onto power after losing government statements and insulting the king on social media. an election, unified civil society action was a crucial part of the pressure that forced him to accept the people’s verdict. An access to information bill was In the USA, and elsewhere, attempts were made to suppress protest energies finally approved by parliament in Lebanon, eight years after the first draft by violence and the introduction of constraining laws. InChile , water cannons was presented, following extensive engagement by civil society. In India, were used against Mapuche indigenous protesters seeking the release of Lawyers Collective, a civil society organisation (CSO) that had its registration their detained spiritual leader, and many protesters were detained.
    [Show full text]
  • Nasrin Sotoudeh Has Been Sentenced to 38 Years in Prison and 148 Lashes After Two Grossly Unfair Trials
    Third UA: 126/18 Index: MDE 13/0024/2019 Iran Date: 14 March 2019 URGENT ACTION 38 YEARS AND 148 LASHES FOR WOMEN’S RIGHTS DEFENDER Prominent Iranian human rights lawyer Nasrin Sotoudeh has been sentenced to 38 years in prison and 148 lashes after two grossly unfair trials. The charges against her stem solely from her peaceful human rights work, including defending women’s rights and her outspoken opposition to the death penalty. TAKE ACTION: WRITE AN APPEAL IN YOUR OWN WORDS OR USE THIS MODEL LETTER Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei C/o Permanent Mission of Iran to the UN Chemin du Petit-Saconnex 28 1209 Geneva, Switzerland Dear Mr Khamenei, Nasrin Sotoudeh, a prominent human rights lawyer and women’s rights defender, has been unjustly sentenced to a total of 38 years in prison and 148 lashes following two grossly unfair trials. I appeal to you to release her as she is a prisoner of conscience. On 9 February 2019, Nasrin Sotoudeh was informed by the office for the implementation of sentences in Tehran’s Evin prison, where she is jailed, that the verdict in her most recent court case had been issued. She was allowed to read the verdict, which convicted her on seven charges and sentenced her to 33 years in prison and 148 lashes. Her trial took place on 30 December 2018 before Branch 28 of the Revolutionary Court in Tehran in her absence. She has not been allowed access to her lawyer. Some of the charges against her are related to her opposition to forced hijab (veiling) laws, including “inciting corruption and prostitution” and “openly committing a sinful act…by appearing in public without a hijab”.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report12
    Annual Report12 Advocating for peace, justice & equality ii Nobel Women’s Initiative Supporting our work for peace The Nobel Women’s Initiative would like to thank the following organizations and individuals whose generous support allowed us to serve as a voice for women, peace and security around the world in 2012: Cynda Collins Arsenault Sarah Cavanaugh Lauren Embrey Sara Vetter Kay Wilemon Nancy and Emily Word Trea Yip FLOW: Funding Leadership and Opportunities for Women of the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs MDG3 Fund of the Netherlands Ministry of Development Cooperation Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs Kalliopeia Foundation Cornell Douglas Foundation UN Women, Latin American and Caribbean Section All of the Nobel Peace Laureates of the Nobel Women’s Initiative in 2012: Shirin Ebadi Mairead Maguire Rigoberta Menchú Tum Leymah Gbowee Tawakkol Karman Jody Williams And many more generous individuals. I think the most powerful thing is women saying over and over and in different places that women have to stand up and take the lead in making the “world a better place for everyone. ”- Jody Williams 2012 ANNUAL REPORT 1 Message from the Nobel Women …humanity is fast evolving to this higher consciousness… We can rejoice and celebrate today because we are living in a miraculous time. Everything “is changing and everything is possible. Mairead Maguire ” Amidst the turmoil of the past year, hope sprang forth as women around the world took the lead in nonviolent movements for change. From the democratic uprisings in the Middle East and North Africa, to the quest for justice for survivors of sexual violence in Central America, and the protests against the oil sands pipeline in North America, women have emerged front and centre, as peacebuilders and commu- nity leaders, to put an end to gender violence, promote just societies, and build healthy, sustainable environments.
    [Show full text]