Chapter 3 Affected Environment
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Reporting Marks
Lettres d'appellation / Reporting Marks AA Ann Arbor Railroad AALX Advanced Aromatics LP AAMX ACFA Arrendadora de Carros de Ferrocarril S.A. AAPV American Association of Private RR Car Owners Inc. AAR Association of American Railroads AATX Ampacet Corporation AB Akron and Barberton Cluster Railway Company ABB Akron and Barberton Belt Railroad Company ABBX Abbott Labs ABIX Anheuser-Busch Incorporated ABL Alameda Belt Line ABOX TTX Company ABRX AB Rail Investments Incorporated ABWX Asea Brown Boveri Incorporated AC Algoma Central Railway Incorporated ACAX Honeywell International Incorporated ACBL American Commercial Barge Lines ACCX Consolidation Coal Company ACDX Honeywell International Incorporated ACEX Ace Cogeneration Company ACFX General Electric Rail Services Corporation ACGX Suburban Propane LP ACHX American Cyanamid Company ACIS Algoma Central Railway Incorporated ACIX Great Lakes Chemical Corporation ACJR Ashtabula Carson Jefferson Railroad Company ACJU American Coastal Lines Joint Venture Incorporated ACL CSX Transportation Incorporated ACLU Atlantic Container Line Limited ACLX American Car Line Company ACMX Voith Hydro Incorporated ACNU AKZO Chemie B V ACOU Associated Octel Company Limited ACPX Amoco Oil Company ACPZ American Concrete Products Company ACRX American Chrome and Chemicals Incorporated ACSU Atlantic Cargo Services AB ACSX Honeywell International Incorporated ACSZ American Carrier Equipment ACTU Associated Container Transport (Australia) Limited ACTX Honeywell International Incorporated ACUU Acugreen Limited ACWR -
FLAT ROCK MASTER PLAN CITY of FLAT ROCK CITY COUNCIL Resolution 03-20-05
MASTER PLAN 2017 CITY OF FLAT ROCK, MICHIGAN MARCH 2017 Master Plan 2017 City of Flat Rock, Michigan Prepared by: 235 East Main Street, Suite 105 Northville, Michigan 48167 Telephone: (248) 596-0920 Facsimile: (248) 596-0930 www.mcka.com RESOLUTION OF ADOPTION CITY OF FLAT ROCK MASTER PLAN CITY OF FLAT ROCK CITY COUNCIL Resolution 03-20-05 Motion by Martin Supported by Wrobel RESOLVED, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing upon the expiration of the deadline for comment by the required entities to review the proposed Master Plan on January 23, 2017, pursuant to Public Act 33 of 2008, the Michigan Planning Enabling Act, MCL 125.3801 et. seq., and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission approved the Master Plan by adopting a resolution by the affirmative vote of at least 2/3 of its members on February 27, 2017, and WHEREAS, the Secretary of the Planning Commission has now submitted a copy of the Master Plan to the Flat Rock City Council, and WHEREAS, the City Council asserted its right to approve or reject the Master Plan by adopting Council Resolution 10-03-09, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission is now requesting that the City Council approve the Master Plan as submitted; therefore be it RESOLVED, that a statement recording this approval shall be signed by the City Clerk and shall be included on the inside of the front or back cover of the Master Plan and Future Land Use Map; be it further RESOLVED, that the Secretary of the Planning Commission is hereby authorized to submit copies of the adopted Master Plan to the required entities in accordance with the law; be it further RESOLVED, that this resolution is given immediate effect. -
2007 Study Plan for the Walhonding Watershed (Richland, Ashland, Wayne, Morrow Knox, Holmes and Coshocton Counties, OH)
Ohio EPA/DSW/MAS-EAU 2007 Walhonding Watershed Study Plan May 9, 2007 2007 Study Plan for the Walhonding Watershed (Richland, Ashland, Wayne, Morrow Knox, Holmes and Coshocton Counties, OH) State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Surface Water Lazarus Government Center 122 South Front St., Columbus, OH 43215 Mail to: P.O. Box 1049, Columbus, OH 43216-1049 & Monitoring and Assessment Section 4675 Homer Ohio Lane Groveport, OH 43125 & Surface Water Section Central District Office 50 West Town St., Suite 700 Columbus, OH 43215 & Surface Water Section Northwest District Office 347 North Dunbridge Rd. Bowling Green, OH 434o2 & Surface Water Section Southeast District Office 2195 Front Street Logan, OH 43138 1 Ohio EPA/DSW/MAS-EAU 2007 Walhonding Watershed Study Plan May 9, 2007 Introduction: During the 2007 field season (June thru October) chemical, physical, and biological sampling will be conducted in the Walhonding watershed to assess and characterize water quality conditions. Sample locations were either stratified by drainage area or selected to ensure adequate representation of principal linear reaches. In addition, some sites were selected to support development of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) models or because they are part of Ohio EPA’s reference data set. Four major municipal and two major industrial NPDES permitted entities exist in the study area (Table 1). Beyond assuring that sample locations were adequate to assess these potential influences, the survey was broadly structured to characterize possible effects from other pollution sources. These sources include minor permitted discharges, unsewered communities, agricultural or industrial activities, and oil, gas or mineral extraction. -
ERTAC Rail Emissions Inventory Part 3: Class II and III Locomotives
ERTAC Rail Emissions Inventory Part 3: Class II and III Locomotives Michelle Bergin, GA Environmental Protection Division Matthew Harrell, IL Environmental Protection Agency Mark Janssen, Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium Acknowledgments: Steve Sullivan, American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association David Powell, Genesee & Wyoming Inc. Dennis McGeen, Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Lisa Higgins, Maine Dept. of Environmental Protection Laurel Driver, US EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Support Byeong Kim, GA Environmental Protection Division Introduction Air protection agencies from twenty-seven states, coordinated through the Eastern Regional Technical Advisory Committee (ERTAC) and headed by the Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium (LADCO), identified a need to better quantify and characterize rail-related emissions inventories. Traditional locomotives utilize large diesel engines, resulting in emissions of NO x, diesel PM, hydrocarbons, greenhouse gases, and other air pollutants. These emissions are sometimes concentrated in areas exceeding National Ambient Air Quality Standards. No cohesive nationwide railroad emission estimates based on local operations are known to have been made previously. Inventory development methods for locomotive emissions estimates vary from state to state and, in general, lack the spatial or temporal resolution needed to support air quality modeling and planning 1-5. The ERTAC Rail Subcommittee (ERTAC Rail) was established with active representatives from twelve member states, three regional planning offices, and the US EPA. The subcommittee’s goals are to (1) standardize agencies’ inventory development methods through a collaborative effort, (2) improve the quality of data received and the resulting emission inventories, and (3) reduce the administrative burden on railroad companies of providing data. -
October 2017
May 2017 Error! No text of specified style in document. fff October 2017 September 2016 E r r o r ! No text of specified style in document. | i Indiana State Rail Plan Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ S-1 S.1 PURPOSE OF THE INDIANA STATE RAIL PLAN .................................................................................................. S-1 S.2 VISION, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................. S-1 S.3 INDIANA RAIL NETWORK ............................................................................................................................ S-3 S.4 PASSENGER RAIL ISSUES, OPPORTUNITIES, PROPOSED INVESTMENTS AND IMPROVEMENTS ................................... S-7 S.5 SAFETY/CROSSING ISSUES, PROPOSED INVESTMENTS AND IMPROVEMENTS ....................................................... S-9 S.6 FREIGHT RAIL ISSUES, PROPOSED INVESTMENTS, AND IMPROVEMENTS .............................................................. S-9 S.7 RAIL SERVICE AND INVESTMENT PROGRAM ................................................................................................ S-12 1 THE ROLE OF RAIL IN STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION (OVERVIEW) ................................................ 1 1.1 PURPOSE AND CONTENT .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 MULTIMODAL -
MDOT Michigan State Rail Plan Tech Memo 2 Existing Conditions
Technical Memorandum #2 March 2011 Prepared for: Prepared by: HNTB Corporation Table of Contents 1. Introduction ..............................................................................................................1 2. Freight Rail System Profile ......................................................................................2 2.1. Overview ...........................................................................................................2 2.2. Class I Railroads ...............................................................................................2 2.3. Regional Railroads ............................................................................................6 2.4. Class III Shortline Railroads .............................................................................7 2.5. Switching & Terminal Railroads ....................................................................12 2.7. State Owned Railroads ...................................................................................16 2.8. Abandonments ................................................................................................18 2.10. International Border Crossings .....................................................................22 2.11. Ongoing Border Crossing Activities .............................................................24 2.12. Port Access Facilities ....................................................................................24 3. Freight Rail Traffic ................................................................................................25 -
Your Guide to Mohican Country Geographic References –
YOUR GUIDE TO MOHICAN COUNTRY GEOGRAPHIC REFERENCES By IRV OSLIN Black Fork of the Mohican River — Originates near Shelby, flowing through Richland and Ashland counties. It is impounded by Charles Mill Dam. Downstream of the dam, Black Fork flows under Ohio 603 and Ohio 39, through Perrysville and Loudonville (including the liveries south of the village Ohio 3). The Native American village of Greentown was located on the stretch between Rocky Fork and Perrysville, downstream of County Road 1075. Rocky Fork of the Mohican River flows into Black Fork downstream from Charles Mill Dam. Rocky Fork flows down from Mansfield. Rocky Fork flows under Ohio 603 between Ohio 95 and Ohio 39. Charles Mill Dam — Impounds Black Fork of the Mohican River south of Mifflin. Charles Mill Lake — Not to be confused with Charles Mill Dam. The lake is the body of water behind the dam. Note, Charles Mill Lake and Charles Mill Lake Park are managed by the Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District. The dam is managed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. It is NOT Charles Mill Reservoir, as some call it. Charles Mill Lake Park — A Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District-run park on the shores of Charles Mill Lake. Note, the campground, marina and beach are in Ashland County. The western half of the lake and Eagle Point Campground (on Ohio 430) are in Richland County. Cinnamon Lake — The lake itself is an impoundment of Muddy Fork of the Mohican River. The privately run residential community surrounding it is the third- largest in the county after the City of Ashland and Loudonville. -
Camping Rates 2011 Mwcd Parks
Leesville PARKS AND CAMPGROUNDS RATES Atwood Charles Mill Kokosing Southfork Piedmont Pleasant Hill Seneca Tappan DAILY CAMPING Class A full hook-ups $32.25 $31.75 $34.25 $32.25 $32.25 Class A w/electric $27.00 $29.00 $25.00 $27.00 $30.00 $27.00 $27.00 Class A w/o electric $27.00 $23.00 Class B w/electric $25.00 $23.00 $25.00 Primitive $25.00 $22.00 $25.00 $25.00 30-DAY CAMPING RATES Class A waterfront full hook-up $800.75 Class A non-waterfront full hook-up $765.00 $709.00 $765.00 $765.00 $765.00 Class A waterfront w/electric $632.50 $632.50 $443.75 $749.75 $632.50 Class A non-waterfront w/electric $545.75 $545.75 $367.25 $505.00 $545.75 $545.75 $545.75 Class A waterfront w/o electric $489.50 Class A non-waterfront w/o electric $438.50 Class B waterfront w/electric $581.50 $397.75 Class B non-waterfront w/electric $515.00 $357.00 SEVEN-MONTH RATES Class A waterfront full hook-up $3,340.50 Class A non-waterfront full hook-up $2,835.50 $2,272.50 $2,274.50 $2,835.50 $2,341.00 Class A waterfront w/electric $2,774.50 $2,009.50 $2,321.50 $2,774.50 Class A non-waterfront w/electric $2,239.00 $1,693.25 * $1,453.50 $1,991.00 $1,693.25 $2,239.00 $1,897.25 Class B waterfront w/electric $2,478.50 $2,029.75 Class B non-waterfront w/electric $2,106.25 $1,790.00 *This is a six (6) month rate at Kokosing Campground (NOT a seven [7] month rate) PATIO CABINS Daily $81.50 $76.50 $51.00 Weekly $433.50 $408.00 $306.00 CAMPER CABINS Daily $32.50 $30.50 $30.50 $30.50 Weekly $180.50 $173.50 $173.50 $173.50 GROUP CAMPING (Adult) Up to 10 units $250.00 $270.25 -
Cincinnati 7
- city of CINCINNATI 7 RAILROAD IMPROVEMENT AND SAFETY PLAN Ekpatm~d Tra tim & Engineering Tran~~murnPlanning & Urhn 'Design EXHIBIT Table of Contents I. Executive Summary 1 Introduction 1 Background 7 Purpose 7 I. Enhance Rail Passenger Service to the Cincinnati Union Terminal 15 11. Enhance Freight Railroad Service to and Through Cincinnati 21 111. Identify Railroad Related Safety Improvements 22 RlSP Projects 26 Conclusions 26 Recommendations 27 Credits List of Figures Figure 1 Cincinnati Area Railroads Map (1965) Figure 2 Cincinnati Area Railroads Map (Existing) Figure 3 Amtrak's Cardinal on the C&O of Indiana Figure 4 Penn Central Locomotive on the Blue Ash Subdivision Figure 5 CSX Industrial Track (Former B&0 Mainline) at Winton Road Figure 6 Cincinnati Riverfront with Produce Companies Figure 7 Railroads on the Cincinnati Riverfront Map (1976) Figure 8 Former Southwest Connection Piers Figure 9 Connection from the C&O Railroad Bridge to the Conrail Ditch Track Figure 10 Amtrak's Cardinal at the Cincinnati Union Terminal Figure 11 Chicago Hub Network - High Speed Rail Corridor Map Figure 12 Amtrak Locomotive at the CSX Queensgate Yard Locomotive Facility Figure 13 Conceptual Passenger Rail Corridor Figure 14 Southwest Connection Figure 15 Winton Place Junction Figure 16 Train on CSX Industrial Track Near Evans Street Crossing Figure 17 Potential Railroad Abandonments Map Figure 18 Proposed RlSP Projects Map Figure 19 RlSP Project Cost and Priority Executive Summary Introduction The railroad infrastructure in Cincinnati is critical for the movement of goods within the City, region, and country. It also provides the infrastructure for intercity passenger rail. -
Ohio River Basin Pilot Study
Institute for Water Resources–Responses to Climate Change Program Ohio River Basin Pilot Study CWTS report 2017-01, May 2017 OHIO RIVER BASIN– Formulating Climate Change Mitigation/Adaptation Strategies through Regional Collaboration with the ORB Alliance U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Ohio River Basin Alliance Institute for Water Resources, Responses to Climate Change Program Sunrise on the Ohio River. January, 2014. i Institute for Water Resources–Responses to Climate Change Program Ohio River Basin Pilot Study i Institute for Water Resources–Responses to Climate Change Program Ohio River Basin Pilot Study Ohio River Basin Climate Change Pilot Study Report ABSTRACT The Huntington District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, in collaboration with the Ohio River Basin Alliance, the Institute for Water Resources, the Great Lakes and Ohio River Division, and numerous other Federal agencies, non-governmental organizations, research institutions, and academic institutions, has prepared the Ohio River Basin Climate Change Pilot Report. Sponsored and supported by the Institute for Water Resources through its Responses to Climate Change program, this report encapsulates the research of numerous professionals in climatology, meteorology, biology, ecology, geology, hydrology, geographic information technology, engineering, water resources planning, economics, and landscape architecture. The report provides downscaled climate modeling information for the entire basin with forecasts of future precipitation and temperature changes as well as forecasts of future streamflow at numerous gaging points throughout the basin. These forecasts are presented at the Hydrologic Unit Code-4 sub-basin level through three 30-year time periods between 2011 and 2099. The report includes the results of preliminary investigations into the various impacts that forecasted climate changes may have on both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems and operating water resources infrastructure. -
John F. Bjorklund Collection
John F. Bjorklund Collection Finding Aid to the Collection at the Center for Railroad Photography & Art Prepared by Jordan Radke Last updated: 03/30/17 Collection Summary Title: John F. Bjorklund Collection Span Dates: 1950 – 2004 Bulk Dates: 1971 – 2001 Creator: Bjorklund, John F., 1939 – 2005 Extent: 99 metal cartons in 17 archival boxes (55,221 color slides); 17 linear feet Language: English Repository: Center for Railroad Photography & Art, Madison, WI Abstract: Color slides by John F. Bjorklund, from his collection of approximately 55,000 photographs, which his widow, Mrs. Rose Bjorklund, donated to the Center in 2011. The collection focuses on American and Canadian railroads from the late 1960s through the early 2000s, spanning much of North America. Selected Search Terms Country: Canada United States State/Province: Alberta Nevada Arizona New Brunswick Arkansas New Hampshire British Columbia New Jersey California New Mexico Colorado New York Idaho North Carolina Illinois North Dakota Indiana Nova Scotia Iowa Ohio Kansas Oklahoma Kentucky Ontario Louisiana Oregon Manitoba Pennsylvania Michigan Prince Edward Island Minnesota Quebec Missouri Saskatchewan Montana South Dakota Nebraska Tennessee John F. Bjorklund Collection 2 Texas Washington D.C. Utah West Virginia Vermont Wisconsin Virginia Wyoming Washington Railroad Name: Algoma Central Railway Detroit, Toledo and Ironton Railroad Ann Arbor Railroad East Broad Top Railroad Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railway Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway Arcade and Attica Railroad Erie Railroad -
Regulations Governing the Use of Setlines, Banklines, Trotlines, and Floatlines in the Inland Fishing District
Division of Wildlife Publication 28 Ohio Department of Natural Resources (R1096) Regulations Governing the Use of Setlines, Banklines, Trotlines, and Floatlines in the Inland Fishing District SETLINES OR BANKLINES are used to catch turtles and fish. The name and address of the user must be attached to each line. The maximum is 50 lines, each having a single hook. Treble hooks may not be used. The lines must be attached to the shore above water, but not to a boat, dam, dock, pier, pole, rod, or wall. No more than six set or banklines may be used in all public waters of the state of Ohio less than 700 surface acres. All lines must be inspected or maintained once every 24 hour period. All lines must be removed after completion of use. It is unlawful for any person to disturb or molest a legally placed set or bankline of another without permission from the set or bankline user. TROTLINES must be marked with the name and address of the user. Trotlines must be anchored. Wire or cable may not be used. Not more than three trotlines are permitted in any one body of water in the Inland Fishing District. Not more than 50 hooks per trotline are permitted in any tributary of Lake Erie. Trotlines may not be used within 1,000 feet downstream of any dam. Trotlines may be used only in (1) streams; (2) Mosquito Lake north of the causeway and south of a line of buoys designating the wildlife refuge; (3) Charles Mill Lake north of St.