DOCSLIB.ORG

U.S. DEPARTMENT of TRANSPORTATION Federal Highway Administration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
U.S. DEPARTMENT of TRANSPORTATION Federal Highway Administration U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Highway Administration RECORD OF DECISION April 2015 Trinity Parkway From IH-35E/SH-183 To US-175/SH-310 Dallas County, Texas Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) Control Section Job (CSJ) 0918-45-121 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 1 II. DECISION ................................................................................................................................................ 3 III. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ........................................................................................................... 4 III.A. No-Build Alternative ........................................................................................................................ 5 III.B. Build Alternatives ............................................................................................................................. 5 III.B.1. Initial Identification of Potential Corridors ............................................................................... 5 III.B.2. Development and Modification of Reasonable Alternatives .................................................... 6 III.B.3. Alternatives Screening Process: Executive Orders Practicability Analysis ................................ 9 III.B.4. EO Practicability Analysis Findings .......................................................................................... 10 III.B.5. Only Practicable Alternative Findings as to Wetlands and Floodplains .................................. 11 III.B.6. EO Practicability Analysis Conclusion...................................................................................... 14 III.B.7. The Environmentally Preferable Alternative .......................................................................... 16 IV. SECTION 4(f) and SECTION 6(f) ........................................................................................................ 17 V. MITIGATION MEASURES .................................................................................................................... 18 V.A. Compatibility with Local Use Plans/Policies ................................................................................... 18 V.B. Social ............................................................................................................................................... 18 V.C. Economics ....................................................................................................................................... 20 V.D. Cultural Resources and Parklands .................................................................................................. 21 V.E. Impacts to Water Features ............................................................................................................. 22 V.F. Vegetation and Wildlife Impacts ..................................................................................................... 24 V.G. Potential Impacts to Water Quality and Water Use ....................................................................... 25 V.H. Floodplain Impacts ......................................................................................................................... 27 V.I. Air Quality Impacts and Project Level Conformity Determination .................................................. 28 V.J. Noise Impacts .................................................................................................................................. 29 V.K. Visual Impacts ................................................................................................................................. 30 V.L. Hazardous/Regulated Materials ..................................................................................................... 30 V.M. Utilities........................................................................................................................................... 31 V.N. Energy and Mineral Impacts .......................................................................................................... 31 V.O. Temporary Impacts during Construction ....................................................................................... 31 V.P. Indirect Effects ................................................................................................................................ 33 TRINITY PARKWAY RECORD OF DECISION PAGE i V.Q. Cumulative Impacts ........................................................................................................................ 33 V.R. Regional Indirect and Cumulative Effects of Tolled Facilities and Managed Lanes........................ 35 VI. MONITORING OR ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM ............................................................................... 36 VII. COMMENTS RECEIVED ON THE FEIS ............................................................................................. 37 VIII. CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................................... 37 Exhibit (found at the end of the Record of Decision (ROD)) Exhibit 1. Selected Alternative 3C Map Appendices Appendix A. Design Modifications to the Recommended Alternative as Presented in the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) Appendix B. List of Mitigation Measures and Commitments Appendix C. Comments on the FEIS and Responses Appendix D. Agency Coordination since Publication of the FEIS PAGE ii TRINITY PARKWAY RECORD OF DECISION I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY This document is the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) Record of Decision (ROD) for the proposed Trinity Parkway project. This ROD describes FHWA’s selection of Alternative 3C, henceforth referred to as the Selected Alternative 3C, as described in the Trinity Parkway Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) dated March 7, 2014 and updated in this ROD. The FEIS and the administrative project record are available for review by written request to the Texas Division of the FHWA. This ROD is FHWA approval of the Selected Alternative 3C for the Trinity Parkway and completes the environmental review process for the project. The FHWA (lead agency), the North Texas Tollway Authority (NTTA), the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), and the City of Dallas are project sponsors. The United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) are cooperating agencies for the project. As set forth in this ROD, the Selected Alternative 3C is the most practicable alternative in terms of both project cost and the needs and welfare of the community, and best serves the need for and purpose of this project. As shown in Exhibit 1, the Trinity Parkway project area comprises approximately 7,474 acres and is located on the west side of the Dallas Central Business District (CBD) in central Dallas County. The proposed project is a limited-access toll facility extending from the IH-35E/SH-183 interchange (northern terminus) to the US-175/SH-310 interchange (southern terminus), a distance of approximately 8.8 miles. This will provide a reliever route generally to the west of the Dallas CBD for Lower Stemmons (segment of IH-35E from the Mixmaster north to the Dallas North Tollway), Mixmaster (IH-30/IH-35E interchange), and the Canyon (depressed segment of IH-30 south of the CBD) thereby alleviating a major traffic bottleneck affecting mobility throughout the Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW) Metroplex in the north central Texas region. For the Trinity Parkway, the alternative alignments were developed within the project area to fulfill the need for and purpose of the project, to minimize potential environmental impacts, and to respond to public/landowner and resource agency comments. A Recommended Alternative was not identified in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS, February 2005), the Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement (SDEIS, February 2009), or the Limited Scope Supplemental (LSS, March 2012). After extensive evaluation and analyses in addition to response to and consideration of all substantive public and agency input, a Recommended Alternative (Build Alternative 3C) was included in the FEIS (March 2014). TRINITY PARKWAY RECORD OF DECISION PAGE 1 All four of the Build Alternatives described in the FEIS would affect both wetlands and floodplains, thus federal Executive Order (EO) 11988 (Floodplain Management) and EO 11990 (Protection of Wetlands) required the use of a ‘practicability analysis’ for the decision-making process. These EOs direct federal agencies to avoid new construction in floodplains and wetlands unless the head of the agency determines that there is no practicable alternative to such construction and the proposed action includes all practicable measures to minimize harm to floodplains and wetlands which may result from such use. As set forth in the FEIS and this ROD, FHWA finds that the Selected Alternative 3C is the only practicable alternative after following the required policies contained in EOs 11988 and 11990 and FHWA implementing regulations and guidance. After consideration of the agency and public comments received, the merits of the No-Build Alternative and the other Build Alternatives, as well as updated environmental data and impacts, mitigation planning for the Selected Alternative 3C has been included in this ROD. The concept of the Trinity Parkway project
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Texas Instruments Central Expressway Campus
    CHAPTER Central Expressway 3 The Original To McKinney September 1958 he freeway era in North Texas began on August Dates: original opening Campbell T19, 1949, when a crowd estimated at 7000 Collins Radio Expressway. Just three years earlier the path of the original building freewaycelebrated was the the opening Houston of &the Texas first Centralsection Railroad,of Central the ArapahoArap - bolic moment of triumph for the private automobile as March 5, 1955 75 itfirst displaced railroad the to berailroad built throughfor personal Dallas. transportation. It was a sym Richardson Widespread ownership of automobiles and newly built Spring Valley Rd freeways were poised to transform cities all across Texas Instruments Interstate 635 the United States. In North Texas, Central Expressway Campus interchange: Jan 1968 would lead the way into the freeway era, becoming 635 Semiconductor Building developing into the modern-day main street of Dallas. Spring 1954 the focus of freeway-inspired innovations and quickly North Texas were pioneered along Central Expressway. ForestForest LaneLane Hamilton Park The ManyMeadows of the Building, defining opened attributes in 1955 of modern-day alongside Cen - subdivision EDS headquarters c1975-1993 fortral the Expressway expansion near of business Lovers Lane, into the was suburbs. the first The large ex - plosiveoffice building growth outside of high-tech downtown industry and and paved the risethe wayof the June 1953 suburban technology campus began along the Central Expressway corridor in 1958 when Texas Instruments Walnut Hill (former H&TC) Northpark DART Red Line campus and Collins Radio opened a microwave engi- Mall opened the first building of its Central Expressway Northwest Highway new upscale suburban neighborhoods along Central Expresswayneering center and in young Richardson.
    [Show full text]
  • 31403 191903
    191903 8-7-t9 ORDINANCE NO. 3',f 40 3 An ordinance amending Chapter 9, "Bicycles," and Chapter 28, "Motor Vehicles and Traffic," of the Dallas City Code by amending Sections 9-I,9-6, and 28-159; providing that the city may not prohibit electric bicycles from traveling on rights-of-way used by motor vehicles; providing that the city may not prohibit electric bicycles from areas where non-electric bicycles are permitted; providing a penalty not to exceed $500; providing a saving clause; providing a severability clause; and providing an effective date. WHEREAS, the 86th Texas Legislature met between January 8,2019 and May 27,2019; and WHEREAS, H.B. 2188 established regulations for the operation of electric and non- electric bicycles; and WHEREAS, H.B. 2188 established that a municipality may not prohibit the operation of an electric bicycle in an area in which the operation of a non-electric bicycle is permitted; and WHEREAS, H.B. 2188 was approved by both chambers of the Texas Legislature; and WHEREAS, H.B. 2188 was signed by Governor Greg Abbott on June 7 , 2019; and WHEREAS, H.B. 2188 becomes law on September 1.,2019;Now, Therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALLAS: Amend Chapter 9 and Chapter 28 (electric bicycles) - Page 1 191 90 3 314 0 3 SECTION 1. That Section 9-1, "Applicability of Traffic Regulations to Bicycle Riders," of Article I, "General," of Chapter 9, "Bicycles," of the Dallas City Code is amended to read as follows: "sEC.9-1.
    [Show full text]
  • For the Love of the City
    Bridging the Trinity For the Love of the City History and RECLAIMING BY THE CITY OF DALLAS DOWNTOWN LAKES OUR RIVER 2009 with a City Skyline he dream of two urban cohesive community,” said The Trinity a river should top the priority list of 2008 lakes and a West Dallas lake Trust Board Member Deedie Rose, every one of our civic leaders.” along the Trinity River is who donated funds to hire Ignacio The Balanced Vision Plan from e at The Trinity Trust OCTOBER 2008: happening. Bunster-Ossa of Wallace Roberts & 2003 depicts two lakes across from believe that what we TRINITY RIVER AUDUBON CENTER Dirt begins flying spring of next Todd to envision the amenities for the downtown, a 90-acre urban lake and a are doing is recapturing There is no place more beautiful to experience all nature has to offer in Dallas. Located in the heart of the year for the first phase of the Trinity phase one urban lakes. 60-acre natural lake. the soul of the city. Great Trinity Forest, this Antoine Predock-designed building is an educational learning center for children and Urban Lakes project. These two lakes In Bunster-Ossa’s vision, many of “Imagine our city grounded by a adults with programs about forest creatures, camping, water testing, kayaking and more. Dallas is here, we are here, – totaling 20 acres in the Trinity River the original features of the Trinity system of lakes and a meandering because of the Trinity River. The Location: 6500 Great Trinity Corridor – will create a new gathering River Corridor Project’s Balanced river through its central corridor, Spaniards who saw the three forks Forest Boulevard place with paddle boarding, canoeing Vision Plan are echoed, such as providing natural beauty and of the Trinity in 1690 exclaimed: and picnicking—in the center of the the council rings, an amphitheater, recreation and encouraging unity, “La Santisima Trinidad,” the Most DECEMBER 2008: LOWER CHAIN OF WETLANDS city.
    [Show full text]
  • Dallas-Fort Worth Freeways Texas-Sized Ambition Oscar Slotboom Dallas-Fort Worth Freeways Texas-Sized Ambition
    Dallas-Fort Worth Freeways Texas-Sized Ambition Oscar Slotboom Dallas-Fort Worth Freeways Texas-Sized Ambition Oscar Slotboom Copyright © 2014 Oscar Slotboom Published by Oscar Slotboom ISBN Hard cover print edition: 978-0-9741605-1-1 Digital edition: 978-0-9741605-0-4 First printing April 2014, 100 books Second printing August 2014, with updates, 60 books Additional information online at www.DFWFreeways.com Book design, maps and graphics by Oscar Slotboom. Image preparation and restoration by Oscar Slotboom. Book fonts: main text, Cambria except chapter 5, Optima; captions, Calibri; notes and subsection text, Publico. Illustrations on pages viii, 44, 64, 76, 149, 240, 250, 260, 320, 346, 466 and 513 by M.D. Ferrin based on preliminary sketches by Oscar Slotboom. Image Ownership: All images credited to a source other than the author are property of the credited owner and may not be used without the permission of the owner. Disclaimer: No warranty or guarantee is made regarding the accuracy, completeness or reliability of information in this publication. Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of all information presented. Only original sources deemed as reliable have been used. However, any source may contain errors which were carried through to this publication. Manufactured in the United States of America by Lightning Press Cover image: the High Five Interchange, US 75 Central Expressway and Interstate 635 Lyndon B. Johnson Freeway, photographed by the author in June 2009 Back cover image: the Fort Worth downtown Mixmaster interchange, Interstate 30 and Interstate 35W, photographed by the author in September 2009 Contents Foreword ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution of Support for the Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) D2 Subway Project, Which Will Establish a Second Light Rail Alignment Through Downtown Dallas
    Dallas County ☒ Resolution ☐ Solicitation/Contract BRIEFING / COURT ORDER ☐ Executive Session Commissioners Court - Feb 02 2021 ☐ Addendum Resolution of Support for the Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) D2 Subway Project, Which Will Establish a Second Light Rail Alignment Through Downtown Dallas. Briefing Date: Feb 2 2021 Funding Source: N/A Originating Department: Public Works Prepared by: Jurmerline Randle, Foreclosed Property Specialist Recommended by: Alberta Blair, Director of Public Works BACKGROUND INFORMATION: DART is currently preparing a submittal to continue to advance the D2 Subway Project through the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Capital Investment Grant (CIG) program as a Core Capacity project. The D2 Subway extends from Victory Park to the Deep Ellum area as shown in the enclosed map (Enclosure 1). The alignment will introduce four new stations and one relocated station including: one surface station (Museum Way), three underground stations (Metro Center, Commerce, and CBD East) and the relocated Deep Ellum Station from just north of Gaston Avenue to just south of Live Oak Street (now referred to as Live Oak Station). More information about the project is available on www.DART.org/D2, including the May 2020 Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement (SDEIS). Planning for a second alignment has been ongoing since 2007, and DART has advanced the D2 Subway project to 30% design, which is consistent with the September 2017 resolutions of the Dallas City Council and DART Board. The Dallas County Commissioners Court voted unanimously on August 1, 2017, to approve a letter of support for the selection of the D2 Subway Victory Park Right- of-Way Option, which is reflected in the current project design.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Press Release
    Press Release FROM: WSP USA One Penn Plaza New York, NY 10119 CONTACT: Denise Turner Roth Chief Development Officer WSP USA [email protected] 202 370 2943 WSP USA Begins Design for Two Texas Transportation Projects Providing design services for I-30 Dallas Canyon Interchange project, improvements to overburdened Odessa highways. DALLAS, TEXAS (July 15, 2020) — WSP USA, a leading engineering and professional services consultancy, was selected by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) to provide design services for the Interstate 30 (I-30) Dallas Canyon Interchange project and the planning of highway improvements in the Odessa District’s Permian Basin. Dallas I-30 Canyon Reconstruction WSP will take the lead role in providing TxDOT with the design and preparation of plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) and related documents for improvements to the depressed I- 30 roadway known as the “Canyon,” extending from the Interstate 35E interchange to the Interstate 45/Interstate 345 interchange. Becky Fly is serving as WSP project manager. The 1.5-mile-long, $369 million project includes the traffic control concepts to accommodate the 244,800 average daily vehicles and the design of multiple deck parks to re-invigorate the area around the Dallas Convention Center and the neighborhood known as The Cedars. This project will connect to WSP’s previous work on several Dallas mega projects in the area, including, the Dallas Horseshoe DB, Texas High Speed Rail and The Southern Gateway DB, as well as the Dallas I-345 Feasibility/PS&E Study. 2 “The Canyon is the next step in TxDOT’s overall plan to redesign the highway and stitch together South Dallas with downtown,” said Arpit Talati, WSP business manager for the Texas/Mountain region.
    [Show full text]
  • Trinity Parkway Technical Team Proposal (Conceptual Development of the Design Charrette Report) March 2016
    Trinity Parkway Technical Team Proposal (Conceptual Development of the Design Charrette Report) March 2016 Page 1 of 57 Technical Team Larry Beasley – Co-Facilitator Brent Brown – Co-Facilitator bcWORKSHOP – Urban Planning and Design City Design Studio – Urban Planning and Design Larry Good – Urban Planning/Design and Economic Development Gresham, Smith and Partners – Stormwater Management and Design/Environmental Planning Keith Manoy – Transportation Planning Halff Associates – Transportation Planning/Road Design HNTB Corporation – Geotechnical and Levee Integrity Salcedo Group – Civil Engineering Michael Van Valkenburgh and Associates – Environmental Design and Landscape Architecture Local, state and federal project partners: City of Dallas North Texas Tollway Authority (NTTA) North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Page 2 of 57 Design Charrette Team Larry Beasley – Planner/Urban Designer – Chairman* John Alschuler – Economic Development Specialist* Zabe Bent – Transportation Planner* Brent Brown – Urban Planning and Design* Ignacio Bunster-Ossa – Landscape Architect/Urban Designer Timothy Dekker – Hydrology Specialist* Elissa Hoagland Izmailyan – Economic Development Specialist* Allan Jacobs – Planner/Urban Designer Alex Krieger – Architect/Urban Designer* Elizabeth Macdonald – Urban Designer Alan Mountjoy – Architect/Urban Designer* Mark Simmons – Landscape Architect/Ecology Specialist Jeff Tumlin
    [Show full text]
  • Trinity River Corridor Project Update Council Trinity River Committee February 20, 2007 Table of Contents
    Trinity River Corridor Project Update Council Trinity River Committee February 20, 2007 Table of Contents Trinity Parkway/Lakes Design Margaret Hunt Hill Bridge IH-30 Bridge Dallas Floodway Extension Interior Drainage Elm Fork Initiatives Trinity River Audubon Center TXU Transmission Lines In Progress Planning & Economic Development Legislative Update 2 Trinity Parkway/Lakes Design Meeting held on Jan. 23rd to discuss issues with moving Parkway away from levee Consultants have developed a scenario to accommodate this movement Minimal impact to the lakes surface area Maintains Trinity River alignment under UP Railroad trestle Increases the size of the island feature Includes an extended promenade on the upper end of the lake Options were discussed to allow for the river realignment construction to begin in fall 2008 3 Impact of Parkway Shift Away from the Levee y Original Design – Close to Levee 1800' 1350' 200' 250' 500' MIN. 100' RIVER URBAN LAKE PARKWAY 300' MIN. 210' 200' MIN. 500' 100' GREEN/UTILITY CORRIDOR ISLAND PROMENADE MIN. 120’ 4 Impact of Parkway Shift Away from the Levee y New Design 1800' 1280' -110' 130' 250' 500' MIN. 100' RIVER URBAN LAKE PARKWAY 230' MIN. 210' 200' MIN. 500' 100' GREEN/UTILITY CORRIDOR ISLAND PROMENADE -110' 5 Impact of Parkway Shift Away from the Levee Consultants came up with two scenarios Alternative A – simply slides everything over the required amount, in order to fit the Parkway underneath the bridge bays Alternative A’ – “tweaks” Alternative A slightly Maintains the river alignment under the UP Railroad trestle Extends the promenade around the upper end of the Urban Lake Allows for more meandering opportunity for the river Both alternatives increase the size of the island Consultants recommended Alternative A’ for the river alignment opportunities and promenade extension 6 Alternative A E AK L L RA TU NA VIADUCT AL T UR BAN LAKE CONTIE MARGET HUNILBD TRINITY RIVER 500 0 500 1000 SCALE OF FEET 7 Alternative A’ I J - E 3 5 F .
    [Show full text]
  • For Public Inspection Comprehensive
    REDACTED – FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION COMPREHENSIVE EXHIBIT I. Introduction and Summary .............................................................................................. 3 II. Description of the Transaction ......................................................................................... 4 III. Public Interest Benefits of the Transaction ..................................................................... 6 IV. Pending Applications and Cut-Off Rules ........................................................................ 9 V. Parties to the Application ................................................................................................ 11 A. ForgeLight ..................................................................................................................... 11 B. Searchlight .................................................................................................................... 14 C. Televisa .......................................................................................................................... 18 VI. Transaction Documents ................................................................................................... 26 VII. National Television Ownership Compliance ................................................................. 28 VIII. Local Television Ownership Compliance ...................................................................... 29 A. Rule Compliant Markets ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Doug Rosequist Univision Communications 605 Third Avenue New York, NY 10158
    Doug Rosequist Univision Communications 605 Third Avenue New York, NY 10158 January 1, 2019 Dear Doug, The letters announcing the intention of KSTR-DT to begin broadcasting using the new ATSC 3.0 broadcast transmission standard were mailed on December 13, 2018 to 1301 medical facilities within KSTR-DT / ATSC 3’s the predicted coverage area. Enclosed is a copy of the Medical Notification Letter, a list of the addresses, and proof of mailing stamped by the US Post Office in Orlando, Florida. Shortly, you will receive a package containing the undeliverable letters returned by the USPS. The average return rate is generally eight to ten percent and letters are typically returned due to: the facility relocating and forwarding has expired, the name was changed, the facility refused to accept the letter, or the operation merged or was acquired by another company. The returned letters along with the total list of facilities notified and the proof of mailing will be evidence of your sincere attempt and good faith effort to identify and notify health care operations in your coverage area. Please place these documents in your Public File. In closing, it has been a pleasure to serve you and your station, and I look forward to helping you with any other notification needs as they arise in the future. Sincerely, Lisa Sockett COO – RF Notifications MAIL_DATE Attention: Administrator or Biomedical Engineer OrgName_LBN Prac1stAddr Prac2ndAddr PracCity, PracState PracZip Referring to: KSTR-DT - Irving, TX (“KSTR-DT” or the “Station”) NOTICE OF UPCOMING MODULATION SCHEMA, CHANNEL, AND BROADCAST FREQUENCY CHANGES OF KSTR-DT THIS LETTER CONCERNS TELEMETRY OPERATION.
    [Show full text]
  • Trinity River Corridor Project Update
    Trinity River Corridor Project Update Col. Charles H. Klinge Commander, Fort Worth District US Army Corps of Engineers Jill A. Jordan, P.E. Assistant City Manager City of Dallas Dallas City Council briefing Aug. 21, 2013 US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG® 1 Purpose • To provide an overview of the Trinity River Corridor Project • To introduce the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) • To outline next steps 2 Trinity River Corridor Project Partners Federal, State and Local Partners • US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) • City of Dallas • Dallas County • North Texas Tollway Authority (NTTA) • Texas Dept. of Transportation (TxDOT) • Fed. Highway Administration (FHWA) • Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) • North Central Texas Council of Governments (COG) 3 Trinity River Corridor Project Non- Profit Partners • Trinity Trust Foundation • Trinity Commons Foundation • Audubon Society • Boone Family Foundation • Circle Ten Boy Scouts • Dallas Camera Club • Dallas Running Club • Downtown Dallas • EQUEST • Groundwork Dallas • Girl Scouts of Northeast Texas • River Ranch Education Charities • Ocean Conservancy • Scottish Rite Hospital • Student Conservation Association • Texas Horse Park Foundation • Trinity Bird Count • Trinity Strand Trail • The Mission Continues 4 Trinity River Corridor Project Private Sector Partners • AT&T • CVS Caremark • Dallas Morning News • Dr. Pepper/Snapple • National Fish & Wildlife/FedEx • Hilton Anatole • Kroger •
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC MEETING I-345 IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT FROM: I-30 to WOODALL RODGERS FREEWAY (Spur 366) DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS CSJ: 0092-14-094
    PUBLIC MEETING I-345 IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT FROM: I-30 TO WOODALL RODGERS FREEWAY (Spur 366) DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS CSJ: 0092-14-094 Monday, Dec. 2, 2019 Tuesday, Dec. 3, 2019 Thursday, Dec. 5, 2019 St. Philip’s School and CityPlace Sheraton Dallas Hotel Community Center Conference Center Dallas Ballroom 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. Lakewood Room, First Floor 400 N. Olive St. Dallas, Texas 75215 2711 N. Haskell Ave. Dallas, Texas 75201 6:00 – 8:00 p.m. Dallas, Texas 75204 10:00 a.m. – 8:00 p.m. Presentation: 7:00 p.m. 6:00 – 8:00 p.m. Presentations: Noon, 4:30 Presentation: 7:00 p.m. p.m. and 7:00 p.m. FORMAL PRESENTATION BY MS. CEASON CLEMENS, P.E . CEASON CLEMENS, P.E., Public Meeting Officer SLIDE 1 – Title Slide Good evening ladies and gentlemen. Please be seated and we will begin the formal presentation. My name is CEASON CLEMENS and I’m the Deputy District Engineer with the Texas Department of Transportation. Thank you for taking time to be with us and for your interest in the Interstate 345 Feasibility Study, which studies I-345 from its interchange with I-30 to the interchange with Woodall Rodgers Freeway, also known as Spur 366. Page 1 of 10 As you arrived, you were given the opportunity to register your attendance for this meeting at the sign-in table, which allows us to record your participation. You are also invited to make any written comments you may have about the feasibility study using the comment forms provided. There is also a court reporter present to take your verbal comments.
    [Show full text]