DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliography Bibliography AAS (Australian Academy of Science). 2010. ‘Australia’s Renewable Energy Future: December 2009.’ Co-editors: Michael Dopita and Robert Williamson. Australian Academy of Science, Canberra. ABC Rural. 2015. ‘First Shipment of Natural Gas Leaves Gladstone in Queensland Bound for Asia.’ January 6. Available at http://www.abc.net.au/ news/2015–01–06/first-lng-from-csg-ship-leaves-queensland/6002446. ACCSR (Australian Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility). 2014. ‘The State of CSR in Australian and New Zealand 2014: Too Little, Too Slow.’ Available at http://www.csrconnected.com.au/2014/06/the-state-of-csr-in-australia-and- new-zealand-2014-too-slow-too-little/. ACF (Australian Conservation Foundation) and ACJP (Australian Climate Justice Program). 2009. ‘ACF Complaint to Australian Consumer and Competition Commission (ACCC).’ Australian Conservation Foundation and Australian Climate Justice Program, June. Available at http://www.acfonline.org.au/ uploads/res/ACF-Complaint-to-ACCC.pdf. ACF (Australian Conservation Foundation) and ACTU (Australian Council of Trade Unions). 2008. ‘Green Gold Rush: How Ambitious Environmental Policy Can Make Australia a Leader in the Global Race for Green Jobs.’ Available at http:// www.actu.org.au/Images/Dynamic/attachments/6211/Green_Gold%20_Rush_ final.pdf. ACJP (Australian Climate Justice Program). 2009. ‘Corporate Climate Risk: Comparing Political Claims with Actual Disclosures to Shareholders.’ Australian Climate Justice Program. Anderson, Ray. 2009. Confessions of a Radical Industrialist: Profits, People, Purpose: Doing Business by Respecting the Earth. New York: St Martin’s Press. Ansar, Atif, Ben Caldecott and James Tilbury. 2014. ‘Stranded Assets and the Fossil Fuel Divestment Campaign: What Does Divestment Mean for the Valuation of Fossil Fuel Assets?’ Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment, Oxford University, Oxford. Australian Government. 2012a. ‘Australian Gas Resource Assessment 2012.’ Department of Energy, Resources and Tourism; Geoscience Australia; and Bureau of Resources and Energy Economics. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra. ——— (Climate Change Authority). 2012b. ‘Renewable Energy Target Review.’ Final Report. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, December. ———. 2014a. ‘Renewable Energy Target Scheme. Report of the Expert Panel.’ Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, August. ——— (Climate Change Authority). 2014b. ‘Renewable Energy Target Review: Report.’ Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, December. Australian Senate. 2012. ‘The Senate Proof Committees. Electricity Prices Committee Report. Speech: Senator Thistlethwaite (Chair).’ Commonwealth Government, Canberra, 1 November. 194 Bibliography 195 Bailey, Ian and Geoff A. Wilson. 2009. ‘Theorising Transitional Pathways in Response to Climate Change: Technocentrism, Ecocentrism, and the Carbon Economy.’ Environment and Planning A 41(10): 2324–41. Bailey, Ian, Iain MacGill, Rob Passey and Hugh Compston. 2012. ‘The Fall (and Rise) of Carbon Pricing in Australia: A Political Strategy Analysis of the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme.’ Environmental Politics 21(5): 691–711. Baker, Mark. 2012. ‘Hypocrisy Call Over Carbon Tax.’ Sydney Morning Heraldd 1 June. Bakker, Karen. 2005. ‘Neoliberalising Nature? Market Environmentalism in Water Supply in England and Wales.’ Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95(3): 542–65. Banerjee, Subhabrata Bobby. 2008. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.’ Critical Sociologyy 34(1): 51–79 . Barnes, Robert. 2014. ‘Supreme Court Strikes Down Limits on Federal Political Campaign Donations.’ Washington Postt 2 April. Barry, John. 2003. ‘Ecological Modernisation.’ In Environmental Thought. Eds. Edward Page and John Proops. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. ———. 2005. ‘Ecological Modernisation.’ In Debating the Earth: The Environmental Politics Reader. Eds. John S. Dryzek and David Schlosberg. Oxford: Oxford University Press. BCA (Business Council of Australia) and AIG (Australian Industry Group). 2011. ‘Clean Energy Legislation Requires Safeguard Amendments.’ October. Bebbington, Anthony J. 2014. ‘Letter to the Editor: Socio-Economic Conflict: An Opportunity for Mining Companies.’ Journal of Cleaner Production 84: 34. Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Beder, Sharon. 2000. ‘The Decline of the Global Climate Coalition.’ Engineers Australia 41. Begos, Kevin. 2014. ‘Former Health Secretary: Pennsylvania Didn’t Seriously Study Fracking Health Impacts.’ Huffington Postt 12 July. Available at http:// www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/12/pennsylvania-fracking-former-health- secretary_n_5580980.html. Beier, Julia. 2012. ‘CSR “Made in Germany”: Are Voluntary Standards Enough?’ BSR: The Business of a Better World, 19 December. Available at http://www.bsr. org/en/our-insights/blog-view/csr-made-in-germany-are-voluntary-standards- enough. Bell, Stephen and Andrew Hindmoor. 2014. ‘The Structural Power of Business and the Power of Ideas: The Strange Case of the Australian Mining Tax.’ New Political Economyy 19(3): 470–86. Bendell, Jem. 2009. The Corporate Social Responsibility Movement: Five years of Global Corporate Responsibility Analysis from Lifeworth, 2001–2005. Sheffield: Greenleaf. Berger, Charles. 2009. ‘Two Face Strategy May Damage Polluters.’ Australian Financial Review 15 June. Available at http://www.acfonline.org.au/news-media/ opinions/two-faced-strategy-may-damage-polluters-australian-financial- review. Berners-Lee, Mike and Duncan Clark. 2013. The Burning Question. London: Profile Books. Beuermann, Christiane. 2000. ‘Germany: Regulation and the Precautionary Principle.’ In Implementing Sustainable Development: Strategies and Initiatives in 196 Bibliography High Consumption Societies. Eds. William M. Lafferty and James Meadowcroft. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Beuermann, Christiane and Bernhard Burdick. 1997. ‘The Sustainability Transition in Germany: Some Early Stage Experiences.’ Environmental Politics 6(1): 83–107. Beyond Zero Emissions. 2010. ‘Zero Carbon Australia Stationary Energy Plan.’ Energy Research Unit, University of Melbourne, July. Bickle, Mike J. 2009. ‘Geological Carbon Storage.’ Nature GeoScience 2(12): 815–18. Black, Leeora. 2012. ‘The Very Seductive Social Licence to Operate—A Reality Check.’ ProBono News, Pro Bono Australia, 31 October. Available at http:// www.probonoaustralia.com.au/news/2012/10/very-seductive-social-license- operate-%E2%80%93-reality-check. Blackburne, Alex. 2013. ‘From Ethics to Sustainability: Shifting the Investment Debate for 2014.’ Blue & Green Tomorrow, 18 December. Available at http:// blueandgreentomorrow.com/features/from-ethics-to-sustainability-shifting- the-investment-debate-for-2014/. Blowfield, Michael. 2005. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: Reinventing the Meaning of Development?’ International Affairs 81(3): 15–24. Blühdorn, Ingolfur. 2007. ‘Sustaining the Unsustainable: Symbolic Politics and the Politics of Simulation.’ Environmental Politics 16(2): 251–75. Blühdorn, Ingolfur and Ian Welsh. 2007. ‘Eco-politics beyond the Paradigm of Sustainability: A Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda.’ Environmental Politics 16(2): 185–205. Bookchin, Murray. 1980. Towards an Ecological Society. Montreal: Black Rose Books. ———. 1988. ‘Social Ecology versus Deep Ecology.’ Socialist Revieww 18(3): 9–29. Boutilier, Robert G. and Ian Thomson. 2011. ‘Modelling and Measuring the Social Licence to Operate: Fruits of a Dialogue between Theory and Practice.’ International Mine Management, Queensland. Breukers, Sylvia and Maarten Wolsink. 2007. ‘Wind Energy Policies in the Netherlands: Institutional Capacity Building for Ecological Modernisation.’ Environmental Politics 16(1): 92–112. Broome, Hamish. 2014. ‘Revealed: Metgasco’s “Missing” Letters to Ministers.’ The Northern Starr 12 March. Available at http://www.northernstar.com.au/news/ revealed-metgasco-boss-secret-ministerial-correspo/2195647/. Brulle, Robert J. 2013. ‘Institutionalizing Delay: Foundation Funding and the Creation of U.S. Climate Change Counter-Movement Organizations.’ Climate Change 122(4): 681–94. Buchan, David. 2012. ‘The Energiewende—Germany’s Gamble.’ SP 26. The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, June. Available at http://www.oxforden- ergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/SP-26.pdf. Bulkeley, Harriet. 2001. ‘No Regrets?: Economy and Environment in Australia’s Domestic Climate Change Policy Process.’ Global Environmental Change 11(2): 155–69. Burke, Latika. 2014. ‘G20 Summit: Barack Obama Puts Climate Change at Fore in Speech at University of Queensland.’ Brisbane Times 15 November. Buttel Frederick H. 2000. ‘Ecological Modernization as Social Theory.’ G eoforum 31(1): 57–65. Bibliography 197 ———. 2003. ‘Some Reflections on the Anti-Globalisation Movement.’ Australian Journal of Social Issues 38(1): 95–116. Cai, Wenju et al. 2014. ‘Increased Frequency of Extreme La Niña Events under Greenhouse Warming.’ Nature Climate Change 4(2): 111–16. Cama, Timothy. 2014. ‘Five Threats to EPA’s Climate Rule.’ The Hill, 30 November. Available at http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/e2-wire/225418- five-threats-to-the-epas-climate-rule. Carbon Market Institute. 2011. ‘Australia’s Clean Energy Package: A Guide for Business.’ Available at www.carboninstitute.org. Carrington, Damian. 2014. ‘India Will Be Renewables Superpower, Says Minister.’ The Guardian 1 October. Available at http://www.theguardian.com/ environment/2014/oct/01/india-will-be-renewables-superpower-says-energy- minister. Carruthers,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Greenhouse Solutions with Sustainable Energy by Mark Diesendorf
    Review: Greenhouse Solutions with Sustainable Energy By Mark Diesendorf Reviewed by Elery Hamilton-Smith Charles Sturt University, Australia Diesendorf, Mark. Greenhouse Solutions with Sustainable Energy . Sydney, NSW: University of New South Wales Press, 2007. 413 pp. ISBN 978-086-8409-733. AU$45.95, paper. This is indeed a timely book. The proliferation of books on world environmental trends, policies and issues means that there are literally thousands of pages clamoring for the attention of those interested. Many of these are simply advocating specific conceptualizations and solutions to one or more of the many global problems. Too many of them either neglect, or are deficient on, critical assessment of the necessary evidence. Diesendorf writes with great clarity, explaining complex issues and ideas without over-simplifying or dumbing down. Essentially, after a basic conceptual review, he critically evaluates eight major strategic directions, either already practiced or commonly proposed and advocated in global policy arenas. Each of these strategies is assessed in terms of the potential resources, current status and action, environmental, health and social impacts, economic and future development potential. Essentially, he concludes that, at least in Australia and probably globally, a combination of efficient energy use, solar hot water, gas, bio-energy, wind power, improved public transport and fuel-efficient vehicles could halve greenhouse emissions within a few decades. But the political will is lacking, and much government policy action serves only to further the production of greenhouse emissions. The large and wealthy fossil fuel industries, including their infrastructural demands such as power stations, transport, urban structure and building standards, are major determinants of governmental expenditure.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B: Submissions
    B Appendix B - Submissions Submissions 1 Mr Gavin Brown 2 Mr Jonathon Peter 3 Ms Glenda Maxwell 4 Mr Paul Savi 5 Mr Stuart Allinson 6 EcoEnviro Pty Ltd 7 Professor Derek Abbott 8 Mr Ian Fischer 9 Mr David Gates 10 Mr Paul Myers 11 Professor Keith Thompson 12 Mr Barry Murphy 13 Mr Peter Briggs 14 Mr Terry Ryan 15 Mr Denys Smith 16 Professor John Quiggin Attachment 1 16.1 Supplementary to submission 16 190 17 Mr Terje Petersen 18 Mr Allen Tripp 19 Mr Rob Watson-Smith 20 Dr Matthew Gustafson 21 Mr John Hallam 22 Cr Dominic Wy Kanak 23 Mr Ian Bennett 24 Mr Stephen Brown 25 Mr Greig Meyer 26 Mr John Drake 27 Mr Alan Hewett 28 Mr Robert Gishubl 29 ThorCon US 30 Mr Richard Legar and Ms Lyn Allenn 31 Mr Geoff Billard 32 Ms Trish Frail 33 Mr Bruce McDonald 34 Mr Dale Hess 35 Mr Goronwy Price 36 Friends of the Earth Australia 37 Dr Geoffrey Hudson 38 Mr Eric Gribble 39 SMR Nuclear Technology Pty Ltd 40 Mr Gerard Van Hees 41 Dr Ziggy Switkowski AO 42 Mr Allen Biggins 43 Dr Susan Tregeagle 44 Ms Helen Smith APPENDIX B - SUBMISSIONS 191 45 Mr Gregory Wolfe 46 Mr David Allen 47 Mrs Jacqualine McCarroll 48 Mr Mark Fitzsimmons 49 Ms Peggy Fisher 50 Mr Michael Angwin 51 Ms Claudia Tregoning 52 Ms Jenny Lovric 53 Mr Clif Barker 54 Hydricity Systems 55 Mr Stuart McConville 56 Dr Tom Biegler 57 Mr Fred Tropp-Asher 58 Mrs Carmel Laycock 59 Mr Arnaud Coquillard 60 Mr Barrie Hill Attachment 1 Attachment 2 Attachment 3 61 Mr Terry Krieg 62 Mr Dennis Nickell 63 Dr Heiko Timmers 64 Mr Adrian Stephan 64.1 Supplementary to submission 64 65 Mr Wayne Chamley 66 Mr
    [Show full text]
  • Dollars for Death Say No to Uranium Mining & Nuclear Power
    Dollars for Death Say No to Uranium Mining & Nuclear Power Jim Green & Others 2 Dollars for Death Contents Preface by Jim Green............................................................................3 Uranium Mining ...................................................................................5 Uranium Mining in Australia by Friends of the Earth, Australia..........................5 In Situ Leach Uranium Mining Far From ‘Benign’ by Gavin Mudd.....................8 How Low Can Australia’s Uranium Export Policy Go? by Jim Green................10 Uranium & Nuclear Weapons Proliferation by Jim Falk & Bill Williams..........13 Nuclear Power ...................................................................................16 Ten Reasons to Say ‘No’ to Nuclear Power in Australia by Friends of the Earth, Australia...................................................................16 How to Make Nuclear Power Safe in Seven Easy Steps! by Friends of the Earth, Australia...................................................................18 Japan: One Year After Fukushima, People Speak Out by Daniel P. Aldrich......20 Nuclear Power & Water Scarcity by Sue Wareham & Jim Green........................23 James Lovelock & the Big Bang by Jim Green......................................................25 Nuclear Waste ....................................................................................28 Nuclear Power: Watt a Waste .............................................................................28 Nuclear Racism .................................................................................31
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple Benefits Assessment of the Low Emission Development Strategies in Asia-Pacific Cities
    PlacePlace Final Technical Report logo logo CRRP2017-07SY-Farzaneh here here Multiple Benefits Assessment of the Low Emission Development Strategies in Asia-Pacific Cities The following collaborators worked on this project: 1. Hooman Farzaneh, Kyushu University, Japan, [email protected] 2. Benjamin Craig McLellan, Kyoto University, Japan; [email protected] 3. Mahendra Sethi, ISARD, India, [email protected] 4. WANG Xin, Tongji University, China, [email protected] 5. Nasrudin bin Abd Rahim, UM, Malaysia, [email protected] 6. Hang Seng Che, UM, Malaysia, [email protected] 7. Hideaki Ohgaki, Kyoto University, Japan, [email protected] 8. Scott Kelly, UTS, Australia, [email protected] 9. Jose A. Puppim de Oliveira, FGV, Brazil, [email protected] 1 Copyright © 2019 Asia-Pacific Network for Global Change Research APN seeks to maximise discoverability and use of its knowledge and information. All publications are made available through its online repository “APN E-Lib” (www.apn-gcr.org/resources/). Unless otherwise indicated, APN publications may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services. Appropriate acknowledgement of APN as the source and copyright holder must be given, while APN’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services must not be implied in any way. For reuse requests: http://www.apn-gcr.org/?p=10807 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Responding to Climate Change
    IssuesOfOurTime-Text.x:IssuesOfOurTime-Text.x 14/1/08 12:07 PM Page 5 Responding to Climate Change Ian Lowe n 1989, I wrote a book on climate change, Living in the IGreenhouse. At the time the scientific community was still divided about climate change. It was clear that the planet was getting warmer and that other changes were happening, like rising sea levels and altered rainfall patterns. It was also clear that the massive increase in our use of the so-called “fossil fuels” — coal, oil and gas — was changing the amount of carbon dioxide in the air. While a distinguished Swedish scientist had shown in the late 19th century that this could affect the global climate, some cautious colleagues were reluc- tant to accept that human energy use was actually causing the changes that were being observed. As more research has been done, it has become clearer that changes to the global climate have not just followed the increasing human use of fossil fuels but are being caused by that process. While there was genuine uncertainty in the science, it was defensible for short-sighted politicians to do nothing about the problem. The science has now been refined to the point where there is no legitimate dispute about the human influence on climate. That doesn’t mean that the debate is over. As I was finalising this contribu- tion, our national daily newspaper was still printing columns suggesting that we should do nothing because the science is not yet rock-solid! ISSUES OF OUR TIME 5 IssuesOfOurTime-Text.x:IssuesOfOurTime-Text.x 14/1/08 12:07 PM Page 6 IAN LOWE The politicians of the developed world accepted the scientific arguments ten years ago when they negotiated the Kyoto protocol to slow down release of greenhouse gases.
    [Show full text]
  • Passing Gas: Why Renewables Are the Future
    PASSING GAS: WHY RENEWABLES ARE THE FUTURE CLIMATECOUNCIL.ORG.AU Thank you for supporting the Climate Council. The Climate Council is an independent, crowd-funded organisation providing quality information on climate change to the Australian public. Published by the Climate Council of Australia Limited. ISBN: 978-1-922404-21-3 (print) 978-1-922404-22-0 (digital) Andrew Stock © Climate Council of Australia Ltd 2020. Climate Councillor This work is copyright the Climate Council of Australia Ltd. All material contained in this work is copyright the Climate Council of Australia Ltd except where a third party source is indicated. Climate Council of Australia Ltd copyright material is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia License. To view a copy of this license visit http://creativecommons.org.au. Greg Bourne You are free to copy, communicate and adapt the Climate Council of Climate Councillor Australia Ltd copyright material so long as you attribute the Climate Council of Australia Ltd and the authors in the following manner: Passing Gas: Why Renewables are the Future. Authors: Andrew Stock, Greg Bourne, Will Steffen and Tim Baxter. The authors would like to thank our two reviewers, Dr Hugh Saddler and one anonymous reviewer who donated their time of reviewing this report. Professor Will Steffen Climate Councillor — Cover image: Climate Council. Jeeralang A Power Station in Victoria. This report is printed on 100% recycled paper. Tim Baxter Senior Researcher (Climate Solutions) facebook.com/climatecouncil [email protected] twitter.com/climatecouncil climatecouncil.org.au CLIMATE COUNCIL I Contents Key findings .....................................................................................................................................................................................ii 1. Introduction: Gas has no place in Australia’s economic recovery, or climate safe future ................................1 2.
    [Show full text]
  • 100% Renewable Electricity for South Australia a Background Paper for the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission
    100% Renewable Electricity for South Australia A background paper for the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission Conservation Council of South Australia June 2015 This report was researched and written by Dr Mark Diesendorf, Associate Professor and Deputy Director of the Institute of Environmental Studies, UNSW Australia, for the Conservation Council of South Australia. Contact email: [email protected] Views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of the Conservation Council of South Australia. Suggest citation: Diesendorf M (2015) 100% Renewable Electricity for South Australia. Conservation Council of South Australia, Adelaide. 1 2 Contents Executive summary 5 Abbreviations and conversion factor 10 1. Introduction 11 2. Renewable energy resources 12 3. Reliability 12 3.1 Reliability of supply with high penetrations of RE 13 3.2 Reliability of supply with high penetration of nuclear 15 4. Economics 16 4.1 Renewable energy economics 16 4.2 Nuclear energy economics 19 4.3 Comparing costs of renewable and nuclear 21 5. Benefits, risks and safety 21 5.1 Benefits 21 5.2 Risks and safety 23 6. The key challenges and policies for solving them 23 6.1 The key challenges 23 6.2 Targets 24 6.3 Renewable energy incentives 24 6.4 Renewable energy certificates 24 6.5 Reverse auction 25 6.6 Capacity payments for flexible, fast response power stations 25 6.7 Fair feed-in tariffs for small- and medium-scale renewable energy 25 6.8 Fair prices for retail electricity 26 6.9 A new transmission spine 26 6.10 Sea-water pumped hydro 27 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Electricity Policy for Australia
    Renewable electricity policy for Australia Mark Diesendorf Associate Professor, School of Humanities & Languages UNSW Sydney Email: [email protected] November 2018 ABOUT THE AUSTRALIA INSTITUTE The Australia Institute is an independent public policy think tank based in Canberra. It is funded by donations from philanthropic trusts and individuals and commissioned research. We barrack for ideas, not political parties or candidates. Since its launch in 1994, the Institute has carried out highly influential research on a broad range of economic, social and environmental issues. OUR PHILOSOPHY As we begin the 21st century, new dilemmas confront our society and our planet. Unprecedented levels of consumption co-exist with extreme poverty. Through new technology we are more connected than we have ever been, yet civic engagement is declining. Environmental neglect continues despite heightened ecological awareness. A better balance is urgently needed. The Australia Institute’s directors, staff and supporters represent a broad range of views and priorities. What unites us is a belief that through a combination of research and creativity we can promote new solutions and ways of thinking. OUR PURPOSE – ‘RESEARCH THAT MATTERS’ The Institute publishes research that contributes to a more just, sustainable and peaceful society. Our goal is to gather, interpret and communicate evidence in order to both diagnose the problems we face and propose new solutions to tackle them. The Institute is wholly independent and not affiliated with any other organisation. Donations to its Research Fund are tax deductible for the donor. Anyone wishing to donate can do so via the website at https://www.tai.org.au or by calling the Institute on 02 6130 0530.
    [Show full text]
  • View, Nuclear Power Plants Provide a Hope Which Coal Plants Cannot
    ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY: THE CASE OF PHOTOVOLTAICS Submitted to fulfill the requirements for candidacy as an Honors student in the Environmental Studies Program by Abram Walden Kaplan April, 1985 Oberlin College Please do not quote or distribute without the express permission of the author ----and the Environmental--· . --- Studies -- Program,----- Oberlin--- College.--- - Acknowledgements This proJect has been tremendously challenging and satisfying. It has given me the opportunity to link together my studies in many-- different disciplines, and to show their relevance to one another certainly a crucial facet of Environmental Studies. Four people in particular have invested considerable effort in seeing me through the research and writing process, and I cannot express enough my appreciation for their advice: Gil Heilaender and Larry Buell, my Honors advisors, have given me carefully prescribed doses of constructive feedback and thoughtful criticism. Thia proJect never ran into anything one might call a crisis, and my advisors can take much of the credit for preventing that. The two other maJor influences have been my parents, who have been incredibly patient and encouraging in seeing through the development of some of the themes in this thesis. Harlan Wilson, one of my Honors advisors for the first half of the proJect (until he left for a semester in London) was also very helpful in narrowing my focus and forcing me to think about what it was that I was attempting to do. Michael Kraft, Lucy Jarosz, Bob Tufts, Bob Hilborn, David Orr, Jay HacDaniel, George Lankford, and George Foy read all or part of my thesis in various stages, and offered excellent advice in clarifying and refining my writing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic and Institutional Foundations of the Paris Agreement on Climate Change: the Political Economy of Roadmaps to a Sustainable Electricity Future
    THE ECONOMIC AND INSTITUTIONAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE PARIS AGREEMENT ON CLIMATE CHANGE: THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF ROADMAPS TO A SUSTAINABLE ELECTRICITY FUTURE Mark Cooper Senior Fellow for Economic Analysis Institute for Energy and the Environment, Vermont Law School Adjunct Fellow, Silicon Flatirons, University of Colorado Abstract Three recent “roadmap” analyses outline routes to a low-carbon economy that model the decarbonization of the electricity sector and the pervasive electrification of the transportation and industrial sectors. Two of these also impose a pollution constraint on electricity resources that rejects the use of nuclear power and fossil fuels with carbon capture and storage. Using independent cost estimates and sequentially “relaxing” the constraints on resource selection, this paper compares the resource costs of the resulting portfolios of assets needed to meet the need for electricity. Reflecting the continuing decline of the cost of renewable resources, the paper supports the claim that the long run costs of the 100% renewable portfolios are not only less than business-as-usual portfolios, but that the “environmental merit order” of asset selection is quite close to the “economic merit order.” Neither fossil fuels with carbon capture and storage nor nuclear power enters the least-cost, low-carbon portfolio. As long as a rigorous least-cost constraint is imposed on decarbonization, the pollution constraint is superfluous. The paper evaluates the Paris Agreement on climate change in light of these findings. The Agreement is described as a progressive, mixed market economic model with a governance structure based on a polycentric, multi-stakeholder approach for management of a common pool resource.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission: Senate Select Committee on Fuel and Energy
    Submission to Senate Select Committee on Fuel and Energy www.aph.gov.au/SENATE/committee/fuelenergy_ctte/index.htm [email protected] Submission by: Anti-nuclear & Clean Energy Campaign Friends of the Earth, Australia Contact: Jim Green B.Med.Sci.(Hons.), PhD National nuclear campaigner - Friends of the Earth, Australia 0417 318 368 [email protected] PO Box 222, Fitzroy, Victoria, 3065. <www.foe.org.au/anti-nuclear> July 21, 2009 "The nuclear non-proliferation treaty continues to fracture. And there has been little if any progress on nuclear arms reduction – let alone nuclear disarmament." Kevin Rudd 5 July 2007 – Lowy Institute. "[T]he Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty disintegrates before our very eyes … the current non-proliferation regime is fundamentally fracturing. The consequences of the collapse of this regime for Australia are acute, including the outbreak of regional nuclear arms races in South Asia, North East Asia and possibly even South East Asia." Kevin Rudd 19 September 2006 - Sydney Institute. CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Nuclear power and climate change 3. Nuclear power and nuclear weapons 4. Nuclear power and water scarcity 5. Radioactive waste 6. Nuclear accidents 7. Economics of nuclear power 1. INTRODUCTION Friends of the Earth, Australia (FoE) understands that the Select Committee is considering nuclear energy in the context of energy security, hence this submission. While this submission focusses on nuclear power, references to a large and ever-growing number of scientific 'deep cuts' studies - most of which propose a mix of renewables plus concerted energy conservation/efficiency measures - are posted at: www.foe.org.au/anti-nuclear/issues/clean-energy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eye of the Storm. an Integral Perspective on Sustainable
    The Eye of the Storm An Integral Perspective on Sustainable Development and Climate Change Response Christopher Riedy Institute for Sustainable Futures University of Technology, Sydney Thesis submitted for the PhD in Sustainable Futures May 2005 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORSHIP/ORIGINALITY I certify that the work in this thesis has not previously been submitted for a degree nor has it been submitted as part of requirements for a degree except as fully acknowledged within the text. I also certify that the thesis has been written by me. Any help that I have received in my research work and the preparation of the thesis itself has been acknowledged. In addition, I certify that all information sources and literature used are indicated in the thesis. Signature of Candidate _________________________________________________ Acknowledgements The thesis I present here is the culmination of a long journey that has taken many twists and turns. I have many people to thank for their guidance and support along that journey. My supervisors have each contributed in their own way. Mark Diesendorf, my original supervisor, provided the vision that began the journey and introduced me to academic research. It was Mark’s idea to investigate subsidies to fossil fuel production and consumption in Australia. My initial work on subsidies benefited greatly from Mark’s experience. My second supervisor, Chloe Mason, introduced me to the social sciences and to the rigour required of an academic. The lessons were difficult at the time but valuable in hindsight. Indirectly, Chloe taught me to pursue my own research path. My current supervisor, Professor Stuart White, gave me the freedom to pursue that path and my work flourished under his supervision.
    [Show full text]