DOCSLIB.ORG

Ferry County Public Participation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ferry County Public Participation Plan No. __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF FERRY COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER OF ADOPTING THE FERRY COUNTY RESOLUTION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND CURLEW LAKE SUB AREA PLAN WHEREAS, RCW 36.70.320 states that “Each planning agency shall prepare a comprehensive plan for the orderly physical development of the county, or any portion thereof, and may include any land outside its boundaries which, in the judgment of the planning agency, relates to planning for the county"; and WHEREAS, the County desires to engage the public in its planning and policy decisions at all stages. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Ferry County that the attached “Ferry County Comprehensive Plan” and “Curlew Lake Sub-Area Plan” is hereby adopted: APPROVED this ____ day of _______, ______. FERRY COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FERRY COUNTY, WASHINGTON ________________________________________________ , Chairman ________________________________________________ , Member ________________________________________________ , Member ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ________________________________ __________________________________ Amanda Rowton, Kathryn I. Burke Clerk of the Board Prosecuting Attorney 1 DRAFT Ferry County Comprehensive Plan Ferry County Planning Commission Draft – December 19, 2019 DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter 1 Introduction 1-1 Chapter 2 Vision Statement 2-1 Chapter 3 County-Wide Planning Goals and Policies 3-1 Chapter 3.1 Introduction 3-1 Chapter 3.2 Review Policy 3-2 Chapter 3.3 Private Property and Water Right Policy 3-2 Chapter 4 Definitions 4-1 Chapter 5 Land Use & Rural 5-1 Chapter 5.1 Introduction 5-1 Chapter 5.2 Study Area 5-1 Chapter 5.3 Critical Areas 5-1 Chapter 5.3.1 Wetlands 5-2 Chapter 5.3.2 Frequently Flooded Areas 5-3 Chapter 5.3.3 Aquifer Recharge Areas 5-5 Chapter 5.3.4 Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas 5-5 Chapter 5.3.5 Geologically Hazardous Areas 5-6 Chapter 5.3.6 Shorelines 5-6 Chapter 5.4 Natural Resource Lands 5-6 Chapter 5.4.1 Agricultural Lands 5-10 Chapter 5.4.2 Forest Lands 5-10 Chapter 5.4.3 Mineral Lands 5-11 Chapter 5.5 Existing Population and Forecasts 5-13 Chapter 5.6 Land Use 5-13 Chapter 5.6.1 Commercial/Industrial 5-14 Chapter 5.6.2 Residential 5-15 Chapter 5.6.3 Recreation 5-15 Chapter 5.6.4 Community Services 5-15 Chapter 5.7 Rural Element 5-16 Chapter 5.7.1 Rural Area Development Guidelines 5-17 Chapter 5.7.2 Issues Pertaining to Rural Area Development 5-19 Chapter 5.7.3 General Measures to Govern Rural Area Development 5-20 Chapter 6 Circulation Element 6-1 Chapter 6.1 Introduction 6-1 Chapter 6.2 Essential Transportation 6-3 Chapter 6.2.1 Transit Service 6-3 Chapter 6.2.2 Air Transportation 6-3 Chapter 6.2.3 Pedestrian Circulation 6-3 Chapter 6.2.4 Emergency Services 6-3 Chapter 6.2.5 School Busing 6-3 Chapter 6.2.6 Ferry and Rail Services 6-3 Chapter 6.3 Level of Service 6-3 Chapter 6.4 Land Use and Transportation 6-5 Chapter 6.5 Essential Utilities 6-5 Chapter 6.6 Capital Facilities 6-5 Chapter 7 Heritage 7-1 Chapter 7.1 Introduction 7-1 Chapter 7.2 Customs and Culture 7-2 Chapter 7.2.1 Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation 7-2 Chapter 7.2.2 Old Timers 7-2 Chapter 7.2.3 Newcomers 7-2 Chapter 7.3 History of Major Industries 7-2 Chapter 7.3.1 History of Agriculture 7-2 Chapter 7.3.2 History of Timber Industry 7-3 Chapter 7.3.3 History of Mining 7-3 Maps Introduction 1-1 State Requirements 2-1 County-Wide Planning Policies 3-1 Introduction 3-1 Urban Growth Areas and the 20-year population forecast 3-2 Promotion of contiguous and orderly development and provisions of urban services 3-3 Siting of county-wide and state-wide public capital facilities 3-4 County-wide transportation facilities and strategies 3-4 The need for distribution of affordable housing for all economic Segments 3-6 Joint County and City planning in urban areas 3-7 Economic development and employment 3-8 Analysis of fiscal impact 3-9 Policies relating to public education and citizen participation 3-9 Definitions 4-1 Planning Process 5-1 Growth Management Act 5-1 Public opinion survey 5-2 Rural character 5-2 Population trends and forecasts 5-3 Population densities 5-6 Goals and policies 5-6 Land use alternatives 5-7 Final adoption 5-7 Planning area 5-8 Planning Goals 6-1 Vision statement 6-1 Goals and policies 6-4 Land use & rural 6-4 Transportation 6-6 Housing 6-7 Utilities 6-7 Capital facilities 6-7 Heritage 6-8 Economic development 6-8 Rural & Land Use 7-1 Introduction 7-1 Study area 7-1 Major issues 7-2 Critical Areas 7-3 Wetlands 7-4 Functions 7-5 Goals 7-5 Designation of wetlands 7-5 Classification and protection 7-6 Flood plains 7-6 Goals 7-7 Designation 7-8 Historical background 7-9 Prior flood control investigations and actions 7-9 Existing flood plain management 7-9 Basis for establishing the areas of special flood hazard 7-9 Aquifer recharge areas 7-10 Designation 7-11 Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas 7-12 Goals & Policy 7-12 Designation Policy 7-12 Protection Policy 7-13 Soils and geologic material 7-13 Erosion hazard areas 7-15 Geologically hazardous areas 7-16 Landslide hazard areas 7-16 Seismic hazard areas 7-17 Mine hazard areas 7-18 Volcanic hazard areas 7-18 Goals 7-18 Classification 7 -18 Designation of geologically hazardous areas 7-19 Natural resource lands 7-19 Natural resource goal 7-19 Natural resource policies 7-19 Agricultural land of long-term commercial significance 7-21 Goals 7-22 Policies 7-22 Designation of ag lands of long-term commercial significance 7-23 Forest land soils 7-23 Goals of forest lands 7-24 Forest land of long-term commercial significance 7-24 Designation of forest lands 7-25 Mineral resource lands 7-26 Goals of mineral lands 7-26 Mineral land of long-term commercial significance 7-26 Designation of mineral lands 7-27 Existing population and employment 7-28 Population and race 7-28 Age and sex structure 7-28 Income 7-29 Population forecasts 7-31 Population estimates 7-31 Households 7-32 Land use 7-32 Land supply and ownership 7-33 Residential properties 7-33 Intensity of commercial industrial land use 7-34 Agricultural lands 7-34 Timber land 7-36 Mining 7-38 Recreation lands 7-39 Open space corridors 7-39 Community services 7-39 Growth and change in Ferry County 7-40 Residential development 7-40 Forecast of residential land demand 7-41 Infill 7-42 Urban growth areas 7-43 Sub area plans 7-44 Alternative land use scenarios 7-44 Alternative land use plan 7-45 Rural element 7-46 Rural area development - general provisions 7-46 Rural area development definitions 7-47 Rural area development - guidelines 7-48 Issues pertaining to rural area development 7-54 General measures to govern rural area development 7-55 Implementation plan 7-57 Maps 7-58 Transportation 8-1 Introduction 8-1 Major issues 8-2 Analysis of the existing transportation network 8-3 Level of service 8-5 Land use and transportation 8-11 Planned and programmed improvements (six-year road plan) 8-12 Funding sources 8-13 Recommended road plan 8-14 Housing 9-1 Introduction 9-1 Major issues 9-1 Inventory of existing housing stock 9-2 Land requirements 9-5 Affordable housing 9-7 Ferry County housing authority 9-7 Colville Confederated Tribes Housing Authority 9-7 Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development 9-8 Utilities 10-1 Introduction 10-1 Major issues 10-1 Electrical system 10-2 Solid waste management 10-3 Telecommunications 10-4 Natural gas 10-7 Cable television 10-7 Capital Facilities 11-1 Introduction 11-1 Major issues 11-1 Growth Management Act 11-1 Good management 11-2 Eligibility for grants and loans 11-3 Specific issues affecting Ferry County 11-3 Statutory requirements for capital, facilities plans 11-3 Parks and recreation 11-4 Community facilities 11-5 Schools 11-5 Water service 11-6 Wastewater disposal 11-7 Residential systems 11-7 Community systems 11-7 Wastewater flow standards 11-8 Storm drainage 11-8 Electrical system 11-8 Forecasted future needs 11-9 Water 11-9 Waste water 11-9 Transportation 11-9 Parks and community facilities 11-9 School enrollment and capacity 11-9 Capital facilities program 11-10 Roads 11-10 Schools 11-10 Concurrency 11-11 Transportation 11-11 Water and sewage 11-11 Schools 11-11 Colville Confederated Tribes 11-12 Capital facilities priority list 11-15 Heritage 12-1 Introduction 12-1 Custom and culture 12-1 History of major industries 12-2 Archaeological/historical 12-4 Economic Development 13-1 Introduction 13-1 Major issues 13-1 Implementation 14-1 Regulatory measures 14-1 Capital improvements 14-2 Administrative actions 14-2 Process for initiating plan amendments 14-2 Judicial review 14-3 DEIS or FEIS Appendix A Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION The choices presently confronting Ferry County could dramatically alter the area’s character and quality of life. This Ferry County Comprehensive Plan is a method of deciding between the available choices, and of bringing about the sorts of changes Ferry County residents want.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Biodiesel Use by Washington State Agencies, Jul-Dec 2015
    Biodiesel Use by Washington State Agencies January through December 2017 Published February 2019 Contacts: Chris Liu, Director, Department of Enterprise Services, (360) 407-9201 Eci Ameh, Assistant Director, Department of Enterprise Services, (360) 407-8820 To accommodate persons with disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats by calling the Department of Enterprise Services (DES) at (360) 407-8059. TTY/TDD users should contact DES via the Washington Relay Service at 711 or 1-800-833-638 Biodiesel Use by Washington State Agencies January to December 2017 REPORT HIGHLIGHTS • During 2017, biodiesel purchased by state agencies under state fuel contracts reached a new high, totaling over 1.2 million gallons. This is the fifth year in a row that state agency biodiesel purchases topped 1 million gallons. • Washington State Ferries (WSF) is the largest state agency consumer of diesel fuel. WSF purchased 882,000 gallons of biodiesel during 2017, which is about 74,000 gallons more than that purchased in 2016. This increase was due primarily to overall increased fuel use. WSF averaged 4.7 percent biodiesel in 2017, up from 4.3 percent in 2016, with fuel containing 5 percent biodiesel (B5) the standard fuel for the fleet. • Beyond WSF operations, Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) accounted for the state’s second largest purchaser of diesel fuel. WSDOT purchased 364,000 gallons of biodiesel (B100) during 2017, almost the same amount purchased in 2015 and 2016. Biodiesel made up 19 percent of total diesel fuel purchased in Western Washington and 10% percent in Eastern Washington. Statewide, WSDOT averaged 14 percent biodiesel, down 1 percent from 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Linkchapter
    Index (Italic page numbers indicate major references) Abalone Cove landslide, California, Badger Spring, Nevada, 92, 94 Black Dyke Formation, Nevada, 69, 179, 180, 181, 183 Badwater turtleback, California, 128, 70, 71 abatement districts, California, 180 132 Black Mountain Basalt, California, Abrigo Limestone, Arizona, 34 Bailey ash, California, 221, 223 135 Acropora, 7 Baked Mountain, Alaska, 430 Black Mountains, California, 121, Adams Argillite, Alaska, 459, 462 Baker’s Beach, California, 267, 268 122, 127, 128, 129 Adobe Range, Nevada, 91 Bald Peter, Oregon, 311 Black Point, California, 165 Adobe Valley, California, 163 Balloon thrust fault, Nevada, 71, 72 Black Prince Limestone, Arizona, 33 Airport Lake, California, 143 Banning fault, California, 191 Black Rapids Glacier, Alaska, 451, Alabama Hills, California, 152, 154 Barrett Canyon, California, 202 454, 455 Alaska Range, Alaska, 442, 444, 445, Barrier, The, British Columbia, 403, Blackhawk Canyon, California, 109, 449, 451 405 111 Aldwell Formation, Washington, 380 Basin and Range Province, 29, 43, Blackhawk landslide, California, 109 algae 48, 51, 53, 73, 75, 77, 83, 121, Blackrock Point, Oregon, 295 Oahu, 6, 7, 8, 10 163 block slide, California, 201 Owens Lake, California, 150 Basin Range fault, California, 236 Blue Lake, Oregon, 329 Searles Valley, California, 142 Beacon Rock, Oregon, 324 Blue Mountains, Oregon, 318 Tatonduk River, Alaska, 459 Bear Meadow, Washington, 336 Blue Mountain unit, Washington, 380 Algodones dunes, California, 101 Bear Mountain fault zone, California,
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #3 CURRENT and FUTURE CONDITIONS of the STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
    WSDOT | WASHINGTON TRANSPORTATION PLAN, PHASE 2 – IMPLEMENTATION | 2017 - 2040 Appendix C TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #3 CURRENT AND FUTURE CONDITIONS OF THE STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM APPENDIX C | CURRENT AND FUTURE CONDITIONS WSDOT | WASHINGTON TRANSPORTATION PLAN, PHASE 2 – IMPLEMENTATION | 2017 - 2040 CONTENTS Purpose .............................................................................................................................................. C1 Data Description .............................................................................................................................. C1 Describe The System: Modes ....................................................................................................... C1 Active Transportation .....................................................................................................................................C1 Table C-1: 2008-2015 Bicycle and Pedestrian Count Information .............................................................................. C3 Table C-2: Fatality and Injury Statistics, 2009-2016 .......................................................................................................... C3 Aviation System .................................................................................................................................................C4 Figure C-1: Washington State Public Use Airports ............................................................................................................. C5 Figure C-2: WSDOT Managed
    [Show full text]
  • Ferry County, Washington Community Wildfire Protection Plan Pg I
    Ferry County, Washington Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) DDDeeeccceeemmmbbbeeerrr 888,,, 222000000666 Vision: Promote a countywide hazard mitigation ethic through leadership, professionalism, and excellence, leading the way to a safe, sustainable Ferry County. Volume II This plan was developed by the Ferry County Community Wildfire Protection Plan Core Team in cooperation with Northwest Management, Inc., 233 E. Palouse River Dr., P.O. Box 9748, Moscow, ID, 83843, Tel: 208-883-4488, www.Consulting-Foresters.com Acknowledgments This Community Wildfire Protection Plan represents the efforts and cooperation of a number of organizations and agencies; through the commitment of people working together to improve the preparedness for wildfire events while reducing factors of risk. Ferry County Commissioners Washington State Department of Natural Resources and the employees of Ferry County USDI Bureau of Land Management USDA Forest Service USDI Bureau of Indian Affairs City of Republic, Washington USDI National Park Service Federal Emergency Management Agency Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation Ferry County Sheriff’s Department Ferry/Okanogan County Fire Protection Ferry County Emergency Services District #13 Republic City Police Ferry/Okanogan County Fire Protection Ferry County Public Utilities District District #14 Ferry County Public Hospital District No. 1 Ferry County Joint Fire Protection Ferry Conservation District District #3 & Local Businesses and Citizens of Ferry County To obtain copies of this plan contact: Ferry
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Fish Restoration Project
    Emergency Fish Restoration Project Final Report 2002 DOE/BP-00006664-1 March 2003 Field37: This Document should be cited as follows: LeCaire, Richard, ''Emergency Fish Restoration Project'', Project No. 2001-06600, 28 electronic pages, (BPA Report DOE/BP-00006664-1) Bonneville Power Administration P.O. Box 3621 Portland, Oregon 97208 This report was funded by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), U.S. Department of Energy, as part of BPA's program to protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife affected by the development and operation of hydroelectric facilities on the Columbia River and its tributaries. The views in this report are the author's and do not necessarily represent the views of BPA. EMERGENCY FISH RESTORATION PROJECT CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE COLVILLE INDIAN RESERVATION BPA Project No. 2001-066-00 Project Funded By United States Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration Division of Fish and Wildlife Portland, Oregon Report Prepared for Greg Baesler, COTR Report prepared by Richard LeCaire Fisheries Biologist II Colville Confederated Tribes Emergency Fish Restoration Project Introduction; Lake Roosevelt is a 151-mile impoundment created by the construction of Grand Coulee Dam during the early 1940’s. The construction of the dam permanently and forever blocked the once abundant anadromous fish runs to the upper Columbia Basin. Since the construction of Grand Coulee Dam in 1943 and Chief Joseph Dam in 1956 this area is known as the blocked area. The blocked area is totally dependant upon resident fish species to provide a subsistence, recreational and sport fishery. The sport fishery of lake Roosevelt is varied but consists mostly of Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), Kokanee salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka), Walleye (Stizostedion vitreum) Small mouth bass (Micropterus dolomieui) and white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus).
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Linkchapter
    Index [Italic page numbers indicate major references] accessory minerals, 349 381 biotite, 2, 3, 12, 49, 50, 60, 73, 84, actinolite, 318 Augusta stock, 204 86, 100, 117, 120, 122, 125, agglomerates, 256 Australia, 226 126, 136, 172, 227, 228, 232, aggregates, 291 Axtel quartz diorite, 48, 50,52, 62, 233, 234, 290, 291, 311, 316, Alaska, southeastern, 395,402 64,67 349, 355, 381, 384, 399, 400, Albion Mountains, 286 model, 65 404 albite, 126, 318 Aztec Sandstone, 114 Bitterroot batholith, 348, 350, 355, albitization, 126, 128, 292 356 Alexander terrane, 396, 402 Bahia de Los Angeles tumoff, 22 Bitterroot lobe, 372 allanite, 13, 60, 84, 100, 125, 228, Bahia de San Francisquitos, 22 Bitterroot Range, 348 377 Baja California, 1,19 Black Mountains, 170, 172 alteration, 173 Bald Mountain pendant, 275 blocks, cumulate, 334 posteruptive, 321 Baldy terrane, 34, 41 Blodgett Creek, 348 potassic, 151 barite, 275 Bobeck Peak, 316, 318 sericitic, 292 barium, 229 Bolo Hill, 114 alumina, 309, 350, 391 Barrett Ridge gneiss, 246, 247, 248 Bootleg Wash, 171, 173, 181 aluminosilicate, 49 Barrett Ridge slice, 240, 241, 246 Boston Peak rhyolite, 204, 205 amphibole, 50, 66, 304, 355 Barstow, 273, 275 Boulder City pluton, 170 amphibolite, 49, 209, 226, 241, 345 basalt flows, 136, 197 Boulder Creek, 255, 262 anatexis, crustal, 359 basalt, 64, 137, 163, 170, 173, 185, Boulder Creek Granodiorite, 198 andalusite, 31, 287 316, 333, 341, 342, 344, 356, Boulder Wash area, 170 andesine, 304 371 Boulder Wash volcano, 170 andesite flows, 171 alkali, 163 Boyden Cave pendant,
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Transportation Chronology
    Transportation Chronology by Kit Oldham, updated 2004/p.1 Updated by Kit, 2004 WASHINGTON TRANSPORTATION CHRONOLOGY 1835. The Hudson's Bay Company ship Beaver is the first steamship to travel on Puget Sound. HL #1946 October-November, 1845 . The Michael Simmons-George Bush party cuts a makeshift road from Cowlitz Landing (now Toledo) on the Cowlitz River to Budd Inlet on Puget Sound, where they establish Tumwater, the first American settlement north of the Columbia River. Dorpat, 63; HL # 5646; Meeker, 158. 1851 . A crude wooden track portage line along the north bank of the Columbia river at the Cascades in the Columbia Gorge is the first railway constructed in the future Washington. Schwantes, Railroad , 15. 1852 . The first road established by law in the future Washington state is Byrd's Mill Road between Puyallup, Tacoma, and Steilacoom, established by the Oregon Territorial Legislature. Garrett, 3. 1853 . First overland passenger service from Olympia to the Columbia River begins; passengers are initially carried on freight wagons known as mudwagons (given the poor conditions on the route which do not improve much even when a military road is completed in 1861), with stage coaches coming into use as passengers numbers increase. (Except for the Columbia-Puget Sound connection, stagecoaches are little used in Western Washington, as the waters of Puget Sound provide the crucial transportation links). Dorpat, 66-67; Schwantes, Journey , 88-89. 1853. The steamer Fairy is the first steamer to provide regular service among Puget Sound ports. HL #869 January 7, 1853. Congress appropriates $20,000 for a military road from Fort Steilacoom to Fort Walla Walla by way of Naches Pass, a route that Indians used for generations to travel between Puget Sound and the Yakima Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurement of Lake Roosevelt Biota in Relation to Reservoir Operations
    MEASUREMENT OF LAKE ROOSEVELT BIOTA IN RELATION TO RESERVOIR OPERATIONS FINAL REPORT 1993 Prepared by: Amy C. Voeller Spokane Tribal Fish and Wildlife Center Spokane Tribe of Indians Wellpinit,WA 99040 Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration . Environment, Fish and Wildlife P.O. Box 3621 Portland, OR 97208-3621 Project Number 94-043 Modification Number 001 . Contract Number 94BI32148 \\ DISTRIBUTION OF THIS DOCUMENT IS DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or use- fulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any spe- cific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufac- turer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recom- mendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to collect biological data from Lake Roosevelt to be used in the design of a computer model that will predict biological responses to reservoir operations as part of the System Operation Review Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincoln County, Washington
    Lincoln County, Washington CCoommmmuunniittyy WWiillddffii rree PPrrootteeccttiioonn PPllaann AAAdddooopppttteeeddd bbbyyy ttthhheee LLLiiinnncccooolllnnn CCCooouuunnntttyyy BBBoooaaarrrddd ooofff CCCooommmmmmiiissssssiiiooonnneeerrrsss iiinnn SSSeeepppttteeemmmbbbeeerrr 222000000999 Harker Canyon Fire, Lincoln County, Washington – August 2005 This plan was developed by the Lincoln County Community Wildfire Protection Plan committee in cooperation with the Lincoln County Conservation District, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Bureau of Land Management, and Northwest Management, Inc. Acknowledgments This Community Wildfire Protection Plan represents the efforts and cooperation of a number of organizations and agencies working together to improve preparedness for wildfire events while reducing factors of risk. Lincoln County Conservation District Lincoln County Fire District #1 Lincoln County Fire District #6 Lincoln County Fire District #3 Lincoln County Fire District #7 Lincoln County Fire District #4 Lincoln County Fire District #8 Lincoln County Fire District #5 Lincoln County Fire District #9 Town of Almira Town of Creston Unincorporated Communities Town of Harrington & City of Davenport Town of Odessa City of Sprague Town of Reardan Local Businesses and Citizens of Lincoln County Town of Wilbur To obtain copies of this plan contact: Elsa Coffman, Project Coordinator Phone: 509-725-4181 ext.117 Lincoln County Conservation District Fax: 509-725-4515 1310 Morgan Street PO Box 46 Davenport, Washington 99122 Table of Contents
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Gas Storage in Basalt Aquifers of the Columbia Basin, Pacific Northwest USA: a Guide to Site Characterization
    PNNL-13962 Natural Gas Storage in Basalt Aquifers of the Columbia Basin, Pacific Northwest USA: A Guide to Site Characterization prepared for United States Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory 626 Cochrans Mill Road Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15236 August 2002 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161; phone orders accepted at (703) 487-4650. This document was printed on recycled paper. (8/00) PNNL-13962 Natural Gas Storage in Basalt Aquifers of the Columbia Basin, Pacific Northwest USA: A Guide to Site Characterization S. P. Reidel V. G. Johnson F. A. Spane August 2002 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-76RL01830 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, Washington 99352 Executive Summary Increasing domestic and commercial demand for natural gas in the Pacific Northwest requires development of adequate storage facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Geology
    V 0 1,1\ WASHINGTON VOLJ.J~E~~g~ GEOLOGY REPUBLIC, 1908 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENTOF REPUBLIC CENTENNIAL ISSUE Natural Resources Featuring articles about the geology of the Re_public a_rea , Jennifer M. Belcher- Commissioner of Public Lands the Republic Mining Distri,ct, and Eocene fossil deposits Kaleen Cottingham - Supervisor WASHINGTON IN CELEBRATION OF THE REPUBLIC CENTENNIAL GEOLOGY Vol. 24, No. 2 Raymond Lasmanis June 1996 Washington Division of Geology and Earth Re sources PO Box 47007. Olympia, WA 98504-7007 Washingron Geology (ISSN 1058-2 134) is pub li~hed four times each year by the Wash ington Stale Depart ment of Natural Resources, Division of Geology and Earth Resources . Thi s pub­ lica ti on is free upon request. The Division also publishes bul le­ ti ns, information circu lars, repo n s of inves tigations. geo logic n Apri l 18. 1896. a group of 64 men gathered where the maps, and open-file reports. A list of th ese pub I ications wi II be O Okanogan mail trail crossed Eureka Creek to organize sent upon request. the Eurek a mining distric t. The golu ru sh l uwn u f Eureka sprang up overnight and was soon renamed 'Republic· , af ter DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES the Republic Gold M ini ng & M ill i ng Company. In 1899, Ferry Raymo nd Lasma ni s. S1u re Gen/ogist County was established out of the western ponion of Stevens .I. Eric Schuster, /\ssis1w11 Swte Ceologi.11 County . Republic became the county seat. Wi lliam S. Lingley.
    [Show full text]
  • [Italic Page Numbers Indicate Major References] Abajo Mountains, 314
    Index [Italic page numbers indicate major references] Abajo Mountains, 314 andesite, 70, 82, 86, 267, 295, 297, terranes, 36, 644 Abert Lake-Goose Lake area, 343 299, 303, 305, 308, 310, 343, volcanic. See volcanic arcs Abert Rim area, 303, 377 345, 350, 371, 375, 483, 527, volcanism, 74, 81, 89, 299, 300, Absaroka Range, 290, 354 543, 644, 654 320, 385, 482, 491, 642 Absaroka system, 592 Aneth Formation, 45 waning, 643 Absaroka thrust, 172, 219, 594, 599, Angora Peak member, 316 See also specific arcs 601 Angustidontus, 34 Archean, 629, 632, 651, 652 Absaroka volcanic field, 218, 297, Anita Formation, 275 arches, 15, 46 300, 486, 491 anorthosite, 412, 633 archipelago, volcanic, 453 accretion, 36, 111, 127, 128, 131, Antelope Mountain Quartzite, 38, 40, arenite, 142 141, 168, 242, 252, 254, 262, 420 argillite, 11, 16, 31, 34, 38, 41, 62, 265, 273, 450, 468, 534, 545, Antelope Range Formation, 28 70, 81, 85, 87, 89, 111, 128, 555, 636, 646, 664, 677, 693 Antelope Valley Limestone, 22, 23, 24 130, 133, 136, 138, 141, 160, accretionary prism, 37, 127, 141, 241, anticlines, 213, 319, 340 162, 164, 281, 434, 543, 547, 281, 422, 423, 432, 436, 468, antimony, 643, 644 635, 658, 663, 671, 676 471, 621, 654, 676 Antler allochthon, 422, 431 Argus Range, 365, 600 actinolite, 528, 637 Antler assemblage, 419, 422, 450 Arikaree Formation, 286 Adams Mine, 632 Antler foredeep basin, 35, 61, 62, 74, Arizona, 140, 597 Adaville Formation, 219 94, 96, 420, 425, 430, 471 south-central, 323 Adel Mountain volcanic field, 218, Antler foreland basin, 28, 42,
    [Show full text]