University of Southampton Research Repository
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of Southampton Research Repository Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis and, where applicable, any accompanying data are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non- commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis and the accompanying data cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content of the thesis and accompanying research data (where applicable) must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holder/s. When referring to this thesis and any accompanying data, full bibliographic details must be given, e.g. Thesis: Author (Year of Submission) "Full thesis title", University of Southampton, name of the University Faculty or School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination. Data: Author (Year) Title. URI [dataset] University of Southampton Faculty of Arts and Humanities Department of Archaeology The Perceptual Validity of Visuo-Spatial Approaches to Landscape Archaeology: Implications for Interpretation, Site Presentation and Perceptual Research by Damien Campbell-Bell Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2019 University of Southampton Abstract Faculty of Arts and Humanities Department of Archaeology The Perceptual Validity of Visuo-Spatial Approaches to Landscape Archaeology: Implications for Interpretation, Site Presentation and Perceptual Research by Damien Campbell-Bell Visuo-spatial approaches have been a fundamental aspect of landscape archaeology since its inception. Such methods rely on the visual identification and presentation of spatial relationships, and therefore depend on visual perception. It has been argued that visual perception is affected by an individual’s cultural background. If this is the case, then landscape archaeologists will have a different perception of the landscape to the people that they study, and from many of those to whom they present the past. The former brings into question the validity of data used to form archaeological hypotheses. The latter raises concerns for engaging an increasingly diverse public in heritage. Whilst the extent of cultural influence upon visual perception has been debated widely within archaeology, perceptual research has never been used to inform the discussion. This thesis applies perceptual research to landscape archaeology for the first time, in order to understand the effect of culture upon visual perception. Having established what may be learnt from existing perceptual research about modern populations, archaeological evidence which may give insight into the visual perception of past people is investigated. In order to understand the effect of culture on visual perception of the landscape, a landscape based perceptual experiment was undertaken. Using the principle of Perceptual Uniformitarianism, the results of this experiment were used to argue that culture does not have an effect upon visual perception of the landscape. It was therefore concluded that the underpinnings of landscape interpretation and presentation were perceptually valid. i ii List of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................................ i List of Contents .................................................................................................................................. iii List of Tables ...................................................................................................................................... vi List of Illustrations .............................................................................................................................. vi List of Accompanying Material .......................................................................................................... xi Abbreviations Used ............................................................................................................................ xi 1 Visuo-Spatial Perception in Landscape Archaeology ........................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 What is Visual Perception? ........................................................................................................... 6 1.3 What is Landscape? ...................................................................................................................... 7 1.4 What is Culture? .......................................................................................................................... 11 1.5 Environment, Context and Presentation .................................................................................... 14 1.6 What Constitutes Visuo-Spatial Data in a Landscape Context? .................................................. 16 1.7 Archaeological Approaches to the Perception of Landscape ..................................................... 17 1.8 The Audience in Site Presentation .............................................................................................. 24 1.9 Perceptual Research and Ocularcentrism ................................................................................... 29 1.10 Research Aims, Objectives and Methods.................................................................................. 37 1.11 Summary and Thesis Outline .................................................................................................... 42 2 Visual Perception .......................................................................................................................... 47 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 47 2.2 Requirements for Explaining Visual Perception .......................................................................... 48 2.3 Approaches to Visual Perception ................................................................................................ 50 2.3.1 Phenomenology ................................................................................................................... 50 2.3.2 Gestalt Theory ...................................................................................................................... 52 2.3.3 Probabilistic Functionalism .................................................................................................. 54 2.3.4 Psychological Empiricism ..................................................................................................... 55 2.3.5 Ecological Perception ........................................................................................................... 58 2.3.6 The Enactive Approach to Visual Perception ....................................................................... 65 2.3.7 Sense-Datum Theory ............................................................................................................ 71 2.3.8 Extended Cognition and Perception .................................................................................... 76 2.3.9 Electronic Approaches to Understanding Human Vision ..................................................... 85 2.4 Summary and Archaeological Implications ................................................................................. 87 3 Cross-cultural Perception and Perceptual Experiments .................................................................... 93 iii 3. 1 Theoretical Implications ............................................................................................................. 93 3.1.1 Affordances .......................................................................................................................... 95 3.1.2 Summary of Theoretical Implications ................................................................................ 100 3.2 Illusion and Pictorial Representations ...................................................................................... 100 3.3 Real World Perceptual Experiments ......................................................................................... 106 3.4 Ecological Motor Theory ........................................................................................................... 111 3.5 Conclusions from Perceptual Research Reviews ...................................................................... 115 4 Archaeological Evidence for Perception .......................................................................................... 119 4.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 119 4.2 Maps.......................................................................................................................................... 121 4.3 Geoglyphs............................................................................................................................ 142 4.4 Rock Art ..................................................................................................................................... 146 4.4.1 Drawing Conventions ......................................................................................................... 148 4.4.2 Gestalt Principles