Draft version December 22, 2020

A

Preprint typeset using LT X style emulateapj v. 12/16/11
E

MASS-GAP MERGERS IN ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI

1

Hiromichi Tagawa , Bence Kocsis , Zoltan Haiman , Imre Bartos , Kazuyuki Omukai , Johan Samsing

• 2
• 3
• 4
• 1
• 5

´

¹Astronomical Institute, Graduate School of Science, Tohoku University, Aoba, Sendai 980-8578, Japan

2

Rudolf Peierls Centre for Theoretical Physics, Clarendon Laboratory, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PU, UK
³Department of Astronomy, Columbia University, 550 W. 120th St., New York, NY, 10027, USA
⁴Department of Physics, University of Florida, PO Box 118440, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
⁵Niels Bohr International Academy, The Niels Bohr Institute, Blegdamsvej 17, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

Draft version December 22, 2020

ABSTRACT
The recently discovered gravitational wave sources GW190521 and GW190814 have shown evidence of BH mergers with masses and spins outside of the range expected from isolated stellar evolution. These merging objects could have undergone previous mergers. Such hierarchical mergers are predicted to be frequent in active galactic nuclei (AGN) disks, where binaries form and evolve efficiently by dynamical interactions and gaseous dissipation. Here we compare the properties of these observed events to the theoretical models of mergers in AGN disks, which are obtained by performing one-dimensional N- body simulations combined with semi-analytical prescriptions. The high BH masses in GW190521 are consistent with mergers of high-generation (high-g) BHs where the initial progenitor stars had high metallicity, 2g BHs if the original progenitors were metal-poor, or 1g BHs that had gained mass via super-Eddington accretion. Other measured properties related to spin parameters in GW190521 are also consistent with mergers in AGN disks. Furthermore, mergers in the lower mass gap or those with low mass ratio as found in GW190814 and GW190412 are also reproduced by mergers of 2g-1g or 1g-1g objects with significant accretion in AGN disks. Finally, due to gas accretion, the massive neutron star merger reported in GW190425 can be produced in an AGN disk. Keywords: binaries: close – gravitational waves –galaxies: active – methods: numerical – stars: black holes

1. INTRODUCTION

(Chatzopoulos & Wheeler 2012; Yoon et al. 2012). Like-

wise, the probability that the progenitor of the 85 M

ꢀ

Recently, several gravitational wave (GW) events were reported by LIGO and Virgo whose measured physical properties pose interesting constraints on their astrophysical origin. One of these is GW190521 (The

LIGO Scientific Collaboration et al. 2020b; Abbott

et al. 2020d), in which the masses of the merging
BH avoided a pulsation pair-instability supernova due to uncertainties on the reaction rate of carbon burning is low (Farmer et al. 2019). An alternative proposal is for Pop III stellar remnants to grow via accretion (Safarzadeh & Haiman 2020); this requires the remnant BHs to spend a significant time in a dense gaseous environment of their host protogalaxies. Similarly, the neutron star (NS) merger GW190425 indicates masses higher than in NS binaries observed in the Milky Way (Abbott et al. 2020a). To explain this event, a rapid merging pathway is proposed for the bi-

nary evolution channel (Romero-Shaw et al. 2020; Safarzadeh et al. 2020b; Galaudage et al. 2020). Addi-

tionally, mergers with very unequal masses have been

reported – GW190412 (The LIGO Scientific Collaboration et al. 2020a) and GW190814 (Abbott et al. 2020b)

–, which are also atypical in stellar evolutionary models

of isolated binaries (Gerosa et al. 2020b; Olejak et al.

• +21
• +17

• BHs (85
• M
• and 66

M , but see Nitz & Ca-

• ꢀ
• ꢀ

• −14
• −18

pano 2020) indicate that the merging BHs fall into the so-called “upper-mass gap”, as they are heavier than the maximum BH mass imposed by (pulsation) pair-

instability supernovae (Chatzopoulos & Wheeler 2012;

Farmer et al. 2019). The components’ dimensionless

• +0.27
• +0.24

• spins (a = 0.69
• and 0.73
• ) are also larger than

• −0.62
• −0.64

the maximum natal spins predicted by stellar evolutionary models for angular momentum transfer (Fuller & Ma 2019). A possible electromagnetic counterpart has been reported for GW190521, which, if real, would suggest mergers in gas-rich environments (McKernan et al. 2019; Graham et al. 2020). Further candidates for mergers in the upper-mass gap are reported in GW170729 (Abbott

et al. 2019), GW170817A (Zackay et al. 2019a), and six

other candidates in O3 (Abbott et al. 2020c). A possible explanation proposed for the large masses in these events is isolated binary evolution, presuming that massive BHs can form from Population III (Pop III) or metal-poor

stars (Tanikawa et al. 2020; Kinugawa et al. 2020; Farrell et al. 2020; Liu & Bromm 2020; Liu et al. 2020; Belczyn-

ski 2020). However, due to their expected rapid rotation, stellar remnants are unlikely to retain their hydrogen envelopes and produce BHs as massive as in GW190521
2020). The mass of the secondary object of 2.6 M in

ꢀ

GW190814 falls in the so-called lower mass gap, predicted by stellar-evolutionary models (Fryer et al. 2012;

Zevin et al. 2020 but see Belczynski et al. 2012; Drozda

et al. 2020) and obeyed by observations of X-ray bina-

¨

ries (Ozel et al. 2012). The object in the lower mass gap in GW190814 and a non-zero spin for the primary BH

+0.16 −0.26

• (0.43
• ) in GW190412 are consistent with a scenario

in which the merging compact objects (COs) had experienced previous mergers or significant accretion. These events suggest that growth by gas accretion or hierarchical mergers may be common among COs (see e.g.

O’Leary et al. 2016; Gerosa et al. 2020b; Abbott et al.

E-mail: [email protected]

2

Tagawa et al.

2020d; Hamers & Safarzadeh 2020; Rodriguez et al. 2020; Safarzadeh et al. 2020a; Safarzadeh & Haiman 2020; Yang et al. 2020a; Liu & Lai 2020).

three-body encounters. Highly eccentric CO binaries also form due to the GW-capture mechanism in single-single encounters (e.g. O’Leary et al. 2009) and BS exchange

• interactions (Paper III).
• By analyzing the ensemble of events detected during

LIGO/Virgo’s O1-O3a observing runs, Kimball et al.

(2020) and Tiwari & Fairhurst (2020) found preference

for at least one, but probably multiple hierarchical mergers in the detected sample. The results by Kimball et al. (2020) strongly depend on the escape velocity at the merger sites, with higher escape velocities favoring a larger number of hierarchical mergers.
Regarding the interaction with gas, the velocities of all COs relative to the local AGN disk decrease due to accretion torque and gas dynamical friction. The binaries’ semi-major axis decreases due to gas dynamical friction from the AGN disk. Their semi-major axis and eccentricity evolve also due to type I/II migration torque from a circumbinary disk. COs migrate toward the SMBH due to type I/II torques from the AGN disk. CO masses, BH spins, and the orbital angular momentum directions of binaries gradually evolve due gas accretion (Paper II). We also account for dynamical interactions with single stars/COs and CO binaries. The binaries’ semi-major axis, velocities, orbital angular momentum directions, and eccentricity evolve due to BS interactions as prescribed in Leigh et al. (2018), and the velocities of all COs additionally evolve due to scattering. The soft binaries, i.e. those with binding energy lower than that of scattering objects, are either softened or ultimately disrupted during BS interactions. Hard binaries become harder during BS interactions, and exchange interactions may take place; the most massive pair is assumed to remain in the binary after the interaction (Paper III). The binaries’ separation and eccentricity decrease due to GW emission. When the pericenter distance of the binary becomes smaller than the innermost stable orbit, we assume that BHs merge, assign a kick velocity and mass loss due to GW emission, and prescribe BH spin evolution at the merger as in Paper II.
Active galactic nuclei (AGNs) represent environments where mass growth by gas accretion is possible (Levin 2007) and hierarchical mergers are frequent due to effi- cient hardening by interaction with gas (e.g. Bartos et al.

2017; Stone et al. 2017; McKernan et al. 2018, 2020b,a),

stars, and COs (Tagawa et al. 2020b, hereafter Paper I). Additionally, the high escape velocity in such systems helps retain recoiling merger remnants. Yang et al. (2020b) investigated the possibility of lower mass gap mergers by assuming that the objects are quickly delivered to migration traps of AGN disks where they undergo mergers. In Paper I, we performed one-dimensional (1D) N-body simulations combined with semi-analytical prescriptions for gaseous and stellar effects, to follow the evolution of binary separation, along with the radius and inclination of the orbit around the SMBH. The results showed that binaries form efficiently during dynamical encounters in gas, and mergers are facilitated by binarysingle (BS) interactions in the gap-forming inner regions. In Tagawa et al. (2020a, hereafter Paper II), we extended this model to follow the evolution of BH spins, and binary orbital angular momentum directions. In Tagawa et al. (2020c, hereafter Paper III), we also included the effects of binary eccentricity, and found that mergers are often highly eccentric in AGN disks if BS interactions are confined to the AGN plane due to gaseous torques (see also Samsing et al. 2020) or if the objects migrate close to the SMBH where they undergo GW capture events. In this paper, we extend our previous models to include NSs. We then examine the mass distribution of merging binaries in the AGN channel, and assess the likelihood of mergers in the lower and upper mass gaps, those with highly unequal mass ratios, and massive NS mergers as seen in GW190521, GW190814, GW190412, and GW190425.

2.2. Evolution of neutron stars

While only stellar-mass BHs are followed in Papers I/II/III, here we additionally follow the evolution of NSs among the N-body particles. We assume that stars with zero-age main-sequence masses of 8–20 M

ꢀ

form NSs with 1.3 M . There are initially 5 × 10⁴ NSs

ꢀ

in the fiducial model. As NSs are lighter than BHs, we assume a shallower radial density profile

dN_NS,ini(r)
∝ r^−0.5

,

(1)

dr

where N_NS,ini(r) is the total initial number of NSs within distance r from the central SMBH, and a higher velocity dispersion in the frame comoving with the AGN (σ_NS = 0.4v_kep(r), where v_kep(r) is the Keplerian velocity at r) compared to those for BHs (dN_BH,ini(r)/dr ∝ r⁰, σ_BH = 0.2v_kep(r)), as expected from relaxation processes

(Hopman & Alexander 2006; Szolgyen & Kocsis 2018).

For simplicity, we assume that the spin magnitudes of NSs are always zero, the mass lost during mergers is
2. METHOD
Our model is based on Papers I, II, and III, summarized in § 2.1, with new ingredients described in § 2.2.

2.1. Overview of model

We consider a model with a supermassive BH (SMBH) at the center of a galaxy, surrounded by a gaseous accretion disk (hereafter AGN disk) and a spherical nuclear star cluster (NSC), which are assumed to be in a fixed steady-state. We follow the N-body evolution of COs consisting of those in the nuclear stars cluster and those captured inside the AGN disk. We follow several pathways to form binaries. Some fraction of COs are initially in binaries. In the AGN disk, binaries form due to gas dynamical friction during two-body encounters and dynamical interactions during
0.01 M , and their radius is 10 km, within which NSs are assumed to merge in addition to the condition described above. We regard objects with mass less than

ꢀ

2 M to be NSs, while we call objects with masses in the

ꢀ

range 2–5 M lower mass gap objects (LGOs), and treat

ꢀ

LGOs as BHs in the calculations. We assign no kicks during NS-CO mergers for simplicity (but see Dietrich et al. 2017), while the spin evolution during NS-CO mergers is prescribed as for BH-BH mergers but with zero spin magnitudes for NSs. The interactions of NSs with gas, COs, and stars are prescribed in the same manner as for

Mass-gap mergers in AGN disks

3

Table 1

The results of different models at t = 10 Myr. The two leftmost (”input”) columns show the model number and the differences from the fiducial model. The ”output” columns list the fraction of mergers weighted by the detectable volume for BH-LGO (f_BHLGO), LGO-LGO
(f_LGOLGO), LGO-NS (f_LGONS), BH-BH (f_BHBH), BH-NS (f_BHNS), NS-NS (f_NSNS) binaries, BH-BH binaries with m_bin > 130 M

ꢀ

• (f_M130), and the total number of mergers (N_mer), where LGOs represent lower mass gap objects with masses in 2–5 M
• .

ꢀ

input Parameter output

f_BHBH f_BHNS

Model M1 M2

• f_BHLGO f_LGOLGO
• f_LGONS

3 × 10⁻⁴ 7 × 10⁻⁵ 9 × 10⁻⁵

• f_NSNS
• f_M130

0.03 0.11

N_mer

Fiducial

m_1gBH ≤ 45 M Γ_Edd,cir = 20

4 × 10⁻³ 7 × 10⁻⁴ 5 × 10⁻³
3 × 10⁻⁴ 5 × 10⁻⁵ 5 × 10⁻⁵
0.989 0.998 0.994
6 × 10⁻³ 3 × 10⁻⁴ 1 × 10⁻³ 5 × 10⁻⁵ 8 × 10⁻⁴ 5 × 10⁻⁵
1.6 × 10³ 2.0 × 10³ 1.9 × 10³

ꢀ

• M3
• 0.35

• BHs.
• terms of detection volume for simplicity. The plots are

smoothed by performing kernel-density estimate using Gaussian kernels whose bandwidth is chosen to satisfy Scott’s rule (Scott 1992).

2.3. Numerical choices

The parameters of the fiducial model (M1) are listed in Table 3 in the Appendix, which are the same as those in Papers I/II/III. We also study the additional models M2 and M3, which differ in the initial masses of stellar-mass BHs and efficiency of gas accretion.
In model M1, the primary-mass distribution extends to as high as > 100M despite the low initial BH mass

ꢀ

of ≤ 15 M (Fig. 1 a). High-mass events with & 50 M

• ꢀ
• ꢀ

BHs, including GW190521, primarily arise from high-g mergers as seen in Fig. 2 a, where the distribution is shown for the mergers between high n-generation objects with n ≥ 4. In model M1 at t = 10 Myr, the expected detection fraction of upper-mass gap mergers with 50 M ≤ m₁ ≤ 150 M contributed by 3, 4, 5, 6,
In model M1, we set the mass of first-generation (1g) BHs to m_1gBH ≤ 15 M given the observed high metal-

ꢀ

licity population for 90% of stars in the Milky Way NSC (e.g. Do et al. 2020) and the observations indicating strong mass loss during the luminous blue variable phase of solar-metallicity stars (e.g. Chen et al. 2015), which

• ꢀ
• ꢀ

7, 8, and n ≥ 9th-generation primary BHs is 0, 5, 17, 30, 21, 3, and 24 percent, respectively, where an ng BH signifies a BH consisted of n 1g BHs as the merged prolikely limits the maximum mass of 1g BHs to be ∼ 15 M

ꢀ

(e.g. Belczynski et al. 2010).

On the other hand, in model M2, the initial masses of 1g BHs are multiplied by 3 compared to the values in genitors. As the mass of ng BHs is at most ∼ n × 15 M

ꢀ

in model M1, primary BHs of GW190521-like mergers m₁ ∼ 85 M come from n ≥ 6-g BHs. The fraction of

ꢀ

model M1, and so m_1gBH ≤ 45 M . Such high masses for

ꢀ

massive binary mergers with m_bin ≥ 130 M (∼ 90 per-

ꢀ

1g BHs may exist as indicated by a moderately metalpoor subpopulation in the Milky Way’s NSC (Do et al. 2020), and given that there are significant uncertainties in the initial mass function of 1g BHs in NSCs due to star formation in strong gravitational field (e.g. Nayak-

shin et al. 2007), gas accretion (e.g. Davies & Lin 2020),

uncertainties in stellar evolution (e.g. Belczynski et al. 2010), and the diversity in the possible origin of objects

(e.g. Mapelli & Gualandris 2016).

• centile lower limit for GW190521) over all events (f_M130
• )

is 0.03 in model M1. Since GW190521 was found among ∼ 60 triggers, the rate of this type of events can be explained by the AGN channel if it is the dominant channel for all the detected events. Here, note that the maximum mass of merging binaries (∼ 185 M ) is significantly re-

ꢀ

duced from Papers I (∼ 10⁴ M ), which is discussed in

ꢀ

the Appendix. The mergers tend to have high spin around ∼ 0.7
(Fig. 1 b). This is because the spin of their members is already high as a result of previous episode of mergers (e.g. Buonanno et al. 2008). Also, the angles θ₁, θ₂ between the binary orbital angular momentum and the primary and secondary BH spin, respectively, are widely distributed in the entire range of (0–π) (Fig. 1 c) due to several BS interactions, which are assumed to randomize the orientation of the orbital angular momentum. Yet, strong correlation between θ₁ and θ₂ is still observed owing to spin alignment by gas accretion. High-g mergers have a wide range of χ_p and χ_eff (right panel of Fig. 2 a) due to the spin enhancement during mergers and the randomization of the orbital angular momentum directions by BS interactions.
In model M3, we increase the maximum accretion rate in Eddington units onto stellar-mass COs to 20, given the uncertainties due to radiation feedback onto dust (Toy-

ouchi et al. 2020) and rotating gas (Jiang et al. 2014;

Sugimura et al. 2018), and the possible anisotropy of ra-

diation (Proga et al. 2000).

3. RESULTS

3.1. Upper mass-gap mergers

We first compare the properties of predicted mergers in AGN disks with those of the upper-mass gap event GW190521. The parameter distributions for all events at t = 10 Myr in model M1 are shown in Fig. 1, while those for specific generation mergers at t = 100 Myr reproducing well GW190521 in models M1–M3 in Fig. 2. Note that the maximum binary masses are not sensitive to time in later phases of t ≥ 10 Myr as discussed in the Appendix. In Fig. 2, results at t = 100 Myr are presented to reduce variation due to a small number of mergers. The distributions are weighted by the observable volume depending on the masses of merging binaries calibrated for aLIGO Handford prior to O3 as in Paper I, while the dependence on either χ_eff or eccentricity is ignored in
In summary, the results above demonstrate that mergers between high-g BHs in model M1 is consistent with the observed properties (χ_eff , χ_p, m₁, m₂, a₁, a₂, θ₁, θ₂, rate) of GW190521. Fig. 2b shows the parameter distributions of the 2g-2g BH mergers in model M2, in which the maximum initial BH mass is elevated to 45 M , typical for metal-poor pro-

ꢀ

genitors. This high initial mass allows 2g-2g BH mergers
4

Tagawa et al.

Figure 1. The parameter distributions for merging binaries weighted by the detectable volume at t = 10 Myr in model M1. The four panels present distributions of (a) the masses of primary and secondary object (m₁ vs. m₂) in units of M , (b) the dimensionless spins