<<

GW190521: A Binary

Merger with a Total Mass of 150 M☉ LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration

Discovery paper - Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 101102 (2020) https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P2000020/public

(Astro)physical implications - Astrophys. J. Lett. 900, L13 (2020) https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P2000021/public

Data release - https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P2000158/public 1 Gravitational waves

Gravitational waves (GWs) are ripples in spacetime caused by accelerating masses

Some of the best sources of GWs are colliding black holes and neutron stars

Incoming GWs are measured by the Earth- based detector network

2

LIGO Livingston

LIGO-Virgo observing runs

Average sensitive distance to optimally oriented NS-NS source

https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P1200087/public https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-G1901322/public

3 GW190521 in LIGO Hanford, LIGO Livingston, Virgo

4 GW190521 signal morphology

GW150914 GW150914 Hanford (H1) Livingston (L1)

GW150914

Normalized Normalized energy Normalized energy

GW190521 GW190521 GW190521 Hanford (H1) Livingston (L1) Virgo (V1)

5 LIGO-Virgo sensitivity to binary black hole mergers

● LIGO-Virgo detectors measure the stretching and squeezing of spacetime caused by a passing Inspiral GW Ringdown Merger ● Higher mass binaries correspond to lower frequency GW150914 GW emission GW190521 less sensitive GW170729 ● GW signals from highest mass binaries in LIGO-Virgo detectors more sensitive lack the inspiral (characteristic “chirp”)

6 GW190521 in the context of all LIGO-Virgo detections

Supermassive Black Holes ● So far, LIGO-Virgo has reported 12 binary black hole mergers 105

● The final (remnant) mass of GW190521 is Intermediate Mass Black Holes well above 100 solar masses, marking it as the first intermediate mass black hole (IMBH) detected by LIGO-Virgo

● The primary mass lies outside of the

stellar mass graveyard (> 65 solar masses)

graveyard Stellar mass LIGO-Virgo component mass

LIGO-Virgo remnant mass Solar 7 masses LIGO-Virgo IMBH search sensitivity

LIGO-Virgo sensitive distance in O1-O2 Sensitive distance (Dsen): a measure of how well we can see a given source type on average

IMBH rate upper limit from O1-O2:

Astrophysical merger rate density of GW190521-like events: (based on one detected event)

GW190521, Dsen = 1.7 Gpc (in O3) 8 Searches for GW transients in early O3

Coherent Wave Burst (cWB) GstLAL, MBTA, PyCBC, SPIIR Search for generic transient signals Model-based searches for Cross-correlation in the time-frequency (wavelet) domain compact binary coalescences (CBC)

x

x

9 Low-latency discovery of GW190521

Pipeline Search type GW190521 results

cWB Generic transient Detected with FAR < 1 / 28 yr

GstLAL CBC Detected with FAR above alert threshold

MBTA CBC Not detected

PyCBC Live CBC Detected with FAR ~ 1 / 8 yr

FAR: rate of false alarms SPIIR CBC Detected with FAR above alert threshold ranked higher than the candidate in a given search 6-hr-latency localization using dominant-multipole waveforms w/o precession:

GraceDB page

10 GW190521 rediscovery with offline (archival) search

● Improve calibration of the data Pipeline Search type GW190521 results ● Investigate data quality issues, cWB Generic transient Detected with veto contaminated data FAR ~ 1 / 4900 yr ● Different analysis GstLAL CBC Detected with ○ Candidate ranking FAR ~ 1 / 829 yr ○ Analyzed interferometers ○ Searched mass range PyCBC CBC Detected* with ○ Duration of data used FAR ~ 1 / yr to measure the FAR * Masses/spins of GW190521’s components at the limit of PyCBC’s O3 search range

11 A special signal

● Very short duration (~0.1 s) ??? Massive source ● Low peak frequency (~60 Hz)

● Standard scenario: quasi-circular BBH merger GW190521 Very short inspiral signal

● Alternative scenarios may be explored:

Eccentric Binary, Head-on merger

GW150914

12 Inferring the source properties, assuming quasi-circular BBH

Compare the data to waveform templates for binary black holes:

● Three different template models (NRSurPHM, SEOBPHM, IMRPhenomPHM) ● Numerical simulations ● All include: higher-order multipoles and orbital precession

All models lead to consistent source parameters:

● Discovery paper: results using NRSurPHM. ● Properties & Implications paper: all results.

13 Masses

● Most massive binary ever detected

● Most massive colliding black holes

● Masses within the pair instability gap

14 90% credible regions Spins

Orbital angular momentum

BH1 BH2 ● Spin magnitude (cosmic censorship) ● Orientation (or tilt)

15 Spins

Orbital angular momentum

BH1 BH2 BH1 BH2 ● Spin magnitude (cosmic censorship) ● Orientation (or tilt)

16 Spins

Orbital angular momentum

● Spin magnitude (cosmic censorship) ● tilt = 0: constant orbital plane

17 Spins

Orbital angular momentum

● Spin magnitude (cosmic censorship) ● tilt = 0: constant orbital plane ● tilt not 0: orbital precession

18 Spins

● Spin magnitudes:

○ Strong support at ○ Also at

● Support for misaligned spins

19 Distance and inclination angle

● GWs: sum of many emission modes (multipoles)

● : : Loud signal, only quadrupole multipole ● : Weaker signal, many multipoles.

● No statistical evidence for modes beyond quadrupole

Low latency (6h) estimate: No precession or higher multipoles 20 Final black hole: mass and spin

● The binary merger produces a final BH

● No support for ○ Most massive BH observed via GWs ○ First conclusive observation of an intermediate-mass black hole

● Final spin consistent with the remnant BH of a non-spinning binary

21 Looking at the final black hole: Testing GR

● Two ways to measure the final black hole properties ○ Measure the binary parameters + infer the remnant

22 Looking at the final black hole: Testing GR

● Two ways to measure the final black hole properties ○ Measure the binary parameters + infer the remnant ○ Directly look at the remnant signal ● Black holes characterised by mass and spin

● Material ● Mass

● Size ● Spin

23 Looking at the final black hole: Testing GR

● Two ways to measure the final black hole properties ○ Measure the binary parameters + infer the remnant ○ Directly look at the remnant signal ● Black holes characterised by mass and spin ● Comparing both measurements: test of ● Both agree Redshifted mass

24 Astrophysical implications

IMBHs: the missing link between stellar and supermassive black holes 25 Primary component in the pair-instability (PI) mass gap

Efficient pair production in massive stars drives (pulsational) pair instability:

opens a gap in ~ 65 - 120 M⊙ range

Large uncertainties on mass gap boundaries:

● Nuclear reaction rates, e.g. 12C(α,γ)16O

● Collapse of hydrogen envelope

● Stellar rotation

● Convection model

CHALLENGE FOR

26 Dynamical scenarios: Hierarchical mergers

● Multiple mergers of black holes are possible in dense star clusters and galactic nuclei:

○ mass in the PI gap First-generation (1g) black holes ○ consistent with χ ~ 0 and large χ eff p ○ uncertain rates credit: NASA / ESA / Hubble ● GW170729 final black hole in the PI gap

Second generation ● Results of hierarchical Bayesian inference on (2g) a population model depend strongly on assumed properties of 1g mergers

→ no conclusive evidence for GW190521 to be a 2g merger

27 Dynamical scenarios: Stellar mergers in young star clusters

Giant star ● Merger of a massive star with He core and a with He core MS main sequence (MS) star produces a star star with oversized H envelope

● It could collapse to a black hole in the PI gap credit: NASA, ESA, F. Paresce, R. O’Connell ● In a dense star cluster, the black hole acquires companions dynamically: Stellar merger product ○ primary mass in PI gap

○ consistent with χeff~ 0 and large χp Black hole in PI gap ○ uncertain evolution of stellar collision product

○ rate < 10% of all detectable BBH mergers

Credit: Ugo N. Di Carlo 28 Dynamical scenarios: Active galactic nucleus (AGN) disks

● Gas torques from AGN disks favor black hole pairing and hierarchical mergers

○ primary mass in PI gap

Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech ○ large χ p ○ uncertain rates

○ predicts an EM counterpart

● Candidate optical counterpart in AGN J124942.3+344929 (Graham et al. 2020)

AGN : z = 0.438

GW190521 redshift: z = 0.82 (+0.28, -0.34) (90% CI)

Credit: Imre Bartos 29 Astrophysical implications: Summary

ISOLATED BINARY EVOLUTION: DYNAMICAL SCENARIOS:

● Main issue: primary mass in the PI gap ● All dynamical scenarios we considered might produce BBHs ● Uncertainties on stellar evolution with mass in the PI gap and large χp leave open the possibility that the lower edge of the mass gap is >65 M⊙ ● Rates, masses and spins uncertain and model dependent

CHALLENGE FOR DYNAMICAL AND STELLAR EVOLUTION MODELS

30

Alternative scenarios

HEAD-ON COLLISION or STRONG GRAVITATIONAL LENSING by HIGHLY ECCENTRIC MERGER: galaxies or galaxy clusters:

○ Extremely rare: < 1% of BBH mergers ○ Low expected lensing rate -3 -4 in star clusters ○ Low optical depth (~10 - 10 ) ○ Absence of an identifiable multi-image counterpart

CORE-COLLAPSE SUPERNOVA: → no evidence in favor of strong lensing

○ Inconsistent GW signal morphology ○ Non-detection of neutrino signal COSMIC STRINGS: ○ Data strongly favor BBH over cosmic string PRIMORDIAL BLACK HOLES: cusp or kink model: ○ Exciting scenario for dark matter ○ Difficult to constrain

31 Summary and Conclusions

● GW190521 is well described by GR waveforms. ● The GW signal is consistent with a BBH merger source,

with total mass of 150 M⊙ . ● The final merged (remnant) black hole is an Intermediate Mass Black Hole (IMBH).

● The more massive of the two BHs in binary is ~ 85 M⊙ , in the Pair Instability Supernova mass gap. ● It may itself be the result of a previous BBH merger. ● Good agreement between full IMR waveforms from NR, and ringdown-only, as a test of GR. ● Forthcoming Population paper will address whether GW190521 is consistent with mass distribution of BBHs observed by L-V.

32 The future is LOUD!

● LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA will have a large sample of GW190521-like black holes ● Next-generation ground- and space-based detectors (such as LISA) will detect intermediate-mass black holes LISA over a broad range of masses, further deepening our understanding of BBH formation and populations, and providing powerful tests of GR.

33 Extra slides

34 Distance: impact of higher emission multipoles

● Higher multipoles break degeneracies ○ Distance and inclination

● Absence of higher modes is informative ○ Inclination must be low ○ The source is further away

● Omission of higher modes: ○ Closer source. ○ Low latency alert: 35 Spins

● Spin encoded in two effective parameters

Aligned spins In-plane spins (precession)

● Data barely informative about ● More information about

36 Final black hole: recoil velocity

● GW emission is asymmetric ○ Asymmetric emission of linear momentum ○ Final black hole inherits a recoil velocity ● Recoil depends on mass ratio and spins ○ No spins: < 200km/s ○ Aligned-spins: < 500 km/s ○ Precessing spins: up to 5000km/s ● Spins not greatly constrained: ○ Recoil is not well constrained ○ Consistent with retention in XXXX

37 Bayesian inference on hierarchical mergers

38 Table

39 Skymap

40 Cosmic Strings

41 Searches for GW transients in early O3

Weakly-modeled searches for Not GW190521 generic transient signals Not GW190521

Coherent Wave Burst (cWB)

Relatively insensitive to signal origin and dynamics at the source Model-based searches for compact binary coalescences Not GW190521

with masses from M⊙ to ~500M⊙

GstLAL, MBTA, PyCBC, SPIIR

Balance between physical accuracy, simplicity, sensitivity and computational efficiency

Candidates are assigned a “FAR” The FAR is a property of the search+noise, Rate of false alarms ranked higher than the candidate not an intrinsic property of the GW signal 42