[Edit 'Title' in Document Properties]

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

[Edit 'Title' in Document Properties] EPPING FOREST DISTRICT COUNCIL EXAMINATION OF THE DISTRICT LOCAL PLAN, 2011-2033 MATTER 9: DISTRICT OPEN LAND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT ON BEHALF OF EPPING FOREST DISTRICT COUNCIL APRIL 2019 HS 9 EFDLP Matter 9 Statement FINAL Matter 9: District Open Land Statement by Epping Forest District Council April 2019 INTRODUCTION Epping Forest District Council ("the Council") submits this statement in response to the Inspector's Matters, Issues and Questions ("MIQs") (ED5). This statement addresses Matter 9: District Open Land and provides the Council's response to all of the Inspector's questions associated with Issues 1 to 1 (ED5, p 18). Where appropriate, the Council's responses in this statement refer to but do not repeat detailed responses within the hearing statements submitted by the Council concerning other Matters. Key documents informing the preparation of this statement to which the Council may refer at the hearing sessions include: • EB1608 Green Belt and District Open Land Background Paper (2018) All documents referred to in this statement are listed in Appendix A of this statement together with links to the relevant document included within the Examination Library. Examination Library document references are used throughout for consistency and convenience. HS 9 EFDLP Matter 9 Statement FINAL 1 Matter 9: District Open Land Statement by Epping Forest District Council April 2019 Issue 1: Are the areas of District Open Land designated within the Plan justified and consistent with national policy? Inspector's Question 1 1. Do the provisions of Policy SP6 concerning District Open Land (DOL) seek to do anything different to the policy on Local Green Space (LGS) in the NPPF (paragraphs 76-78)? If not, would it be clearer to use the LGS terminology? Response to Question 1 1. The provisions in Policy SP 6 seek to retain the land designated as District Open Land (DOL) in its current use by affording it the same protection as Green Belt Land. However, upon review of the three areas proposed for designation in the LPSV, the Council considers that their protection is consistent with paragraphs 76 to 78 of the NPPF and does not seek to do anything different. Therefore, the Council proposes to replace all references to District Open Land with Local Green Space in the plan and accompanying policies map. 2. In order to do this, a number of amendments to the plan will be required and these are set out in Appendix B to this statement. Inspector's Question 2 If the DOL designation does not seek to depart from the LGS designation in national policy, does each site designated by the Plan (in NWB, Thornwood & Chigwell) meet the criteria in paragraphs 76-77 of the NPPF? Conversely, if the DOL designation seeks to do something different, are the designations justified with reference to the relevant criteria? Response to Question 2 3. Section 5.3 of the Green Belt and District Open Land Background Paper (EB1608) sets out how the areas of District Open Land identified in the Local Plan Submission Version perform against the characteristics listed in Paragraph 77 of the NPPF. The Council considers that it is more appropriate for these areas to be HS 9 EFDLP Matter 9 Statement FINAL 2 Matter 9: District Open Land Statement by Epping Forest District Council April 2019 designated as Local Green Spaces in accordance with paragraph 77 of the NPPF, and a more detailed consideration of each is provided below. Chigwell Village Green 4. The Council proposes to designate Chigwell Village Green, also known as the ‘Glebe Land’, as LGS because it is an important area of unmanaged open space which is integral to the historic form of the village and makes a significant contribution to the setting of the Chigwell Conservation Area. The Conservation Area Appraisal1 confirms (at page 3) that the land is the "village green […] which is an important area of unmanaged land and provides a natural setting to part of the Conservation Area". It is located in the heart of Chigwell Village adjacent to existing residential properties to the north west, south west and south east, and in close proximity to the amenities and services provided by the village including the primary school. The site is 1.8ha in size, is local in character and relates positively in scale to the village. A Public Right of Way crosses the Village Green, however the land is otherwise not publicly accessible. 5. The land is currently protected from development because it is within the Green Belt. However, as a result of the proposed alteration to the Green Belt to north east to account for development proposals for 59 dwellings connected to Chigwell Primary School, the land will no longer be afforded protection by the Green Belt, and does not benefit from any other designation that would protect it from development pressure. 6. On this basis, the Council proposes to designate this land as LGS because of its proximity to the local community, local historic significance to the setting of the Conservation Area, and to ensure its continued protection from inappropriate development. Thornwood Common 7. This land comprises allotments, open green/recreation space use for informal sports, a children’s playspace and the Parish Hall. It is located centrally within the village of Thornwood Common, functioning as a village green which is fully accessible by the public and owned and managed by North Weald Bassett Parish Council. It is of significant recreational and open space value for the village and its continued role within the centre of the village should be protected in the context of proposed residential and employment site allocations to the east, north and west of the site which are to be removed from the Green Belt. 8. The site is currently within the Green Belt, but does not benefit from any other designation which would protect it from development once the Green Belt is altered to facilitate proposed development on the site allocations in Thornwood. The site is 2.4ha in size, which is local in character and relates positively to the scale of the village. It is located in the centre of the village, adjacent to existing 1 https://www.eppingforestdc.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/chigwell-village- conservation-area.pdf HS 9 EFDLP Matter 9 Statement FINAL 3 Matter 9: District Open Land Statement by Epping Forest District Council April 2019 residential properties at Brookfields, High Road and Weald Hall Lane, and will be adjacent to proposed development coming forward on residential site allocations THOR.R1 and THOR.R2 9. This land is described in North Weald Bassett Parish Council’s Heritage and Character Assessment 20182 on pages 50 as being a recreation ground ‘with the character and function of a village green’ and that it ‘provides amenity greenspace to the residents of Thornwood Common’. 10. On this basis, the Council seeks to designate Thornwood Common as a LGS, recognising its special recreational value at the heart of the local community, and to ensure its continued protection from inappropriate development. Recreational space to the north of Tempest Mead, North Weald Bassett 11. This area of open space was designed as part of the housing scheme at Tempest Mead to provide access to open space for local residents. The development has taken place in the Green Belt which now constitutes a major anomaly, and the Council proposes an alteration to the Green Belt boundary. In order to maintain a defensible boundary, this area of open space is also proposed for release. The land does not benefit from any other designation. 12. It is within a few metres of the houses to the north or the estate and therefore is in close proximity to the community. It provides planned open space connected to the development of Tempest Mead, and provides recreational value to the local community. The area is small, its extent covering 0.78ha in total which is local in character and positively relates to the scale of the development at Tempest Mead. On this basis, the Council proposes to designate the land as LGS due to its local recreation value and to ensure its continued protection from inappropriate development. Conclusion 13. In conclusion, all three areas of land proposed as LGS are consistent with paragraphs 76 to 78 of the NPPF and justified by their local significance, proximity to the local community, local character and the lack of other designations that could otherwise protect the land from inappropriate development. 2 http://www.efdclocalplan.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Heritage-and-Character- Assessment-FINAL.pdf HS 9 EFDLP Matter 9 Statement FINAL 4 Matter 9: District Open Land Statement by Epping Forest District Council April 2019 APPENDIX A: Examination documents referred to in this statement Reference Document Title Author Date EB1608 Green Belt and District Open EFDC 2018 Land Background Paper 5 Matter 9: District Open Land Statement by Epping Forest District Council April 2019 APPENDIX B: Proposed amendments to the LPSV, appendices and policies map Location of proposed amendment Proposed amendment LPSV Paragraph 2.23 (page 18) The Vision for the Lee Valley Regional Park is included in the Local Plan under section 14(2)(a) of the Park Act. The delivery of the Vision is supported by the Local Plan through a number of policies including: • Policy SP 6 Green Belt and District Open Land Local Green Space; LPSV Map 2.2 (page 45) [Map legend item] LPSV Map 2.3 (page 46) District Open Land Local Green Space LPSV Map 2.4 (page 47) LPSV Map 5.1 (page 119) LPSV Map 5.3 (page 124) LPSV Map 5.6 (page 130) LPSV Map 5.8 (page 140) LPSV Map 5.10 (page 119) LPSV Map 5.12 (page 146) LPSV Map 5.13 (page 150) LPSV Map 5.14 (page 153) LPSV Map 5.15 (page 156) LPSV Map 5.16 (page 159) LPSV Map 5.17 (page 162) LPSV Map 5.18 (page 166) 6 Matter 9: District Open Land Statement by Epping Forest District Council April 2019 LPSV Map 5.19 (page 167) LPSV Map 5.20 (page 168) LPSV Map 5.21 (page 169) LPSV Map 5.22 (page 170) LPSV Map 5.23 (page 171) LPSV Map 5.24 (page 172) LPSV Header (page 48) Green Belt and District Open Land Local Green Space LPSV paragraph 2.144 (page 51) 2.144 In some locations the alteration to the Green Belt boundary removes areas of land that are not proposed for change.
Recommended publications
  • Drugs Project Report 2019 Contents
    Drugs Project Report 2019 Contents Introduction . 3 Background . 4 What we accomplished . 4 Clean up of nitrous oxide canisters day . 5 Drug awareness poster campaign . 6 Anonymous survey . 8 Epping Forest Drugs Survey – How we collected the data . 9 The findings . 10 The survey questions Question 1 . 11 Question 2 . 12 Question 3 . 13 Question 4 . 14 Question 5 . 16 Question 6 . 17 Question 7 . 17 Question 8 . 18 The national picture . 19 What the Epping Forest Youth Council would like to see next . 20 A message from Cllr Sam Kane . 21 Lobbying Central Government . 22 Methodology . 23 Thanks . 23 Further reading . 24 References . 24 Poster campaign artwork . 25 Appendix A – Drugs Survey . 26 Appendix B – Youth Projects In Epping Forest 2019 Map . 27 2 Introduction The project was agreed following a consultation with 80 secondary school pupils at the 2017 youth conference and the Youth Councillors debated the topic at an Epping Forest Youth Council meeting. They agreed that some young people were taking drugs and that drugs were easily accessible locally, online and in schools. There was concern about the misuse of nitrous 1 oxide (NO2) and the effect it had on the community and environment. Nitrous oxide gas canisters are easily purchased online and although illegal for under 18s to purchase, no proof of age checks are required for online shopping. The drugs project included a pupil survey, drug awareness poster campaign and a clean-up day. 1 3 Nitrous oxide is also referred to as NO2, balloons, laughing gas and as a ‘legal high’. 3 Background To set the scene, the threat posed by the misuse of psychoactive substances2 has forced the government to launch a ban on these substances under the Psychoactive Substances Act 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Maybanks Farm, Toot Hill, Essex Preliminary
    MAYBANKS FARM, TOOT HILL, ESSEX PRELIMINARY ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT A Report to: Nicolas Tye Architects Report No: RT-MME-121505 Date: February 2016 Triumph House, Birmingham Road, Allesley, Coventry CV5 9AZ Tel: 01676 525880 Fax: 01676 521400 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.middlemarch-environmental.com Maybanks Farm, Toot Hill, Essex RT-MME-121505 Preliminary Ecological Assessment REPORT VERIFICATION AND DECLARATION OF COMPLIANCE This study has been undertaken in accordance with British Standard 42020:2013 “Biodiversity, Code of practice for planning and development”. Report Date Completed by: Checked by: Approved by: Version Paul Roebuck MSc MCIEEM (Senior Dr Philip Fermor Ecological Consultant) Colin Bundy MCIEEM Final 15/02/2016 MCIEEM CEnv and Ella Robinson BSc (Associate Director) (Managing Director) (Hons) (Ecological Project Assistant) The information which we have prepared is true, and has been prepared and provided in accordance with the Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management’s Code of Professional Conduct. We confirm that the opinions expressed are our true and professional bona fide opinions. DISCLAIMER The contents of this report are the responsibility of Middlemarch Environmental Ltd. It should be noted that, whilst every effort is made to meet the client’s brief, no site investigation can ensure complete assessment or prediction of the natural environment. Middlemarch Environmental Ltd accepts no responsibility or liability for any use that is made of this document other than by the client for the purposes for which it was originally commissioned and prepared. VALIDITY OF DATA The findings of this study are valid for a period of 24 months from the date of survey.
    [Show full text]
  • 420 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    420 bus time schedule & line map 420 Ongar - Bobbingworth - North Weald - Epping - View In Website Mode Harlow The 420 bus line (Ongar - Bobbingworth - North Weald - Epping - Harlow) has 3 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Epping: 7:30 PM (2) Harlow Town Centre: 5:30 AM - 7:55 PM (3) Ongar: 4:55 AM - 7:30 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 420 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 420 bus arriving. Direction: Epping 420 bus Time Schedule 23 stops Epping Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 7:30 PM Monday Not Operational Bus Station, Harlow Town Centre 10 East Walk, Harlow Tuesday Not Operational Leisure Centre, Harlow Wednesday Not Operational St Marks School, Tye Green Thursday Not Operational Friday Not Operational Westƒeld, Tye Green Saturday Not Operational Church Leys, Tye Green Tumbler Road, Brays Grove Baileys, Brays Grove 420 bus Info Direction: Epping School, Brays Grove Stops: 23 Trip Duration: 25 min Line Summary: Bus Station, Harlow Town Centre, Larkswood, Potter Street Leisure Centre, Harlow, St Marks School, Tye Green, Westƒeld, Tye Green, Church Leys, Tye Green, The Red Lion, Potter Street Tumbler Road, Brays Grove, Baileys, Brays Grove, Southern Way, Harlow School, Brays Grove, Larkswood, Potter Street, The Red Lion, Potter Street, Park Avenue, Potter Street, Park Avenue, Potter Street Mcdonalds, Thornwood, Horseshoes Farm, Thornwood, Rye Hill Road, Thornwood, Upland Road, Mcdonalds, Thornwood Thornwood, Carpenters Arms, Thornwood Common, Brickƒeld Business Centre, Epping,
    [Show full text]
  • E1.1 Overview of Assessment of Traveller Sites
    Epping Forest District Council Epping Forest District Local Plan Report on Site Selection E1.1 Overview of Assessment of Traveller Sites | Issue | September 2016 Appendix E1.1 Site proceeds at this stage Overview of Assessment of Traveller Sites Site does not proeed at this stage This stage is not applicable for this site Settlement (Sites Site Ref Address Parish proceeding to Stage 4 Promoted Use Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Stage 5 Stage 6 Justification only) Abbess Beauchamp AB 581 Adjoining Woodyhyde, Cockerills Cottage and Fairlands Traveller Site is too close to existing residential property. and Berners Roding Abbess Beauchamp AB 582 Adjoining Anchor House Traveller Site is too close to existing residential property. and Berners Roding Abbess Beauchamp Site is too close to existing residential properties and lacks AB 583 Between The Rodings and Brick Kiln, Anchor Lane Traveller and Berners Roding defined boundary. Abbess Beauchamp AB 584 Adjoining The Rodings, Anchor Lane Traveller Site is too close to existing residential property. and Berners Roding Abbess Beauchamp AB 585 Adjoining Brick Kiln, Anchor Lane Traveller Site is too close to existing residential property. and Berners Roding Abbess Beauchamp AB 586 Adjoining Brick Cottage, Anchor Lane Traveller Site is too close to existing residential property. and Berners Roding Abbess Beauchamp AB 587 West of Berwick House Traveller Site is too close to existing residential property. and Berners Roding Adjoining Berwick House and another residential Abbess Beauchamp AB 588 Traveller Site is too close to existing residential property. property and Berners Roding Adjoining Berwick House and another residential Abbess Beauchamp AB 589 Traveller Site is too close to existing residential property.
    [Show full text]
  • Crime Analysist Presentation
    Crime -EFDC Kim Stalabrass West LPA Partnership Analyst Figures for All Crime, Violence Against the Person & Burglary –Dwelling are taken from the Home Office system iQuanta. Latest data set available is for offences recorded up to and including November 2015. iQuantaprovides data for a 3 year span. Crime -EFDC All Crime 800 Up 14% (630 cases) in 700 comparison to previous 600 year to date. 500 4506 to 5136 cases 400 300 Month on month totals – 200 Dec 2012 591 cases 100 compared with Nov 2015 0 642 cases. An increase of 13 13 14 14 15 15 13 14 15 13 13 14 14 15 15 12 13 13 14 14 15 13 14 15 13 14 15 13 14 15 13 14 15 l l l t 13 t 14 t 15 r r r r r r y y y c v c v c v b b b u u u a a a p p p a a a e o e o e o ug ep ug ep ug ep an un an un an un e e e J J J 7.9% 51 cases overall over A Oc A Oc A Oc J J J J J J M M M F F F D A S N D A S N D A S N M M M 3 years. Crime -EFDC All Crime 90 80 Epping is 8th within Essex and 70 5.9% below the county 60 50 average. 40 In real terms, Epping had 56.8 30 reported incidents against the 20 county average of 60.4 per 10 0 thousand residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B1.1 – Overview of Assessment
    EB801B Epping Forest District Council Epping Forest District Local Plan Report on Site Selection B1.1 Overview of Assessment of Residential Sites | Issue | September 2016 EB801B Appendix B1.1 Site proceeds at this stage. Site references in italic denote that this site was orignially one part of a site Overview of Assessment of Residential Sites Site does not proceed at this stage. SR-0111 comprising multiple parts sharing a single SLAA reference number. An This stage is not applicable for this site. amendment to the site reference was made to create a unique identifier for each site. Settlement (Sites Pre- Site Ref Address Parish proceeding to Promoted Use Secondary Use Split Site Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Justification Stage 1 Stage 2 only) 16 SITE_01 Land south of Roding Lane, Roding River Chigwell Housing Site subject to Major Policy Constraint. Meadows, Buckhurst Hill 16 SITE_02 Land north of Vicarage Lane, Chigwell, IG7 6LS, Chigwell Chigwell Housing The site should not proceed for further testing. UK SR-0001 Prospect Nursery, Old Nazeing Road, Nazeing, Nazeing Housing Site subject to Major Policy Constraint. Broxbourne SR-0002 Wealdstead, Toot Hill Road, Greensted, Ongar, Standford Rivers Housing Site subject to Major Policy Constraint. Essex, CM5 9LJ SR-0003 Two fields East and West of Church Lane (North North Weald North Weald Housing Site is recommended for allocation. of Lancaster Road), North Weald Bassett, Essex Bassett Bassett SR-0004 Land opposite The White House, Middle Street, Nazeing Housing Site subject to Major Policy Constraint. Nazeing, Essex, EN9 2LW SR-0005 54 Centre Drive, Epping Epping Housing Site is subject to extant planning permission dated prior to 31st July 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Epping Forest District Council Representations to the Draft Local Plan Consultation 2016 (Regulation 18)
    Epping Forest District Council Representations to the Draft Local Plan Consultation 2016 (Regulation 18) Stakeholder ID 4854 Name James and Waters Barbara Method Letter Date 28/2/2017 This document has been created using information from the Council’s database of responses to the Draft Local Plan Consultation 2016. Some elements of the full response such as formatting and images may not appear accurately. Should you wish to review the original response, please contact the Planning Policy team: [email protected] Letter or Email Response: Green Belt: The Council are to be congratulated that no alterations have been made to the Green Belt boundaries since 1998. However, the primary aim of this legislation is to prevent sprawl and 'releasing' extra land now will enlarge the existing holes in the Green Belt leading eventually to development cutting a swathe through the district and dividing it from Buckhurst Hill to Harlow. Thornwood Common: The proposed residential site SR-0149 for 124 homes at Thornwood Common is too big. It will impact on the 'Shrubbery' a fine building of character built by a local craftsman in 1898. It will also have a detrimental effect on the Thornwood Common Nature Reserve (est. 1996) by closing off the access/ingress to open countryside. Any development should preserve the field adjacent to the Nature Reserve and not link with Brookfield. Extra houses should be placed away at distance from the High Road, preferably following the line of the original Common boundary; otherwise the open aspect of the area will be destroyed. A good example of this is Forest Grove - replacing the Blacksmith's Arms at Woodside! I cannot see how the provision of such a large number of homes in Thornwood Common will help meet 'local need' unless the District Council actually own these homes and control the allocation to 'local people'.
    [Show full text]
  • Mondays to Fridays Saturdays Sundays
    541 Loughton Station - Debden Station - Epping Station - Harlow TrustyBus (operated by Galleon Travel) The information on this timetable is expected to be valid until at least 1st October 2013. Where we know of variations, before or after this date, then we show these at the top of each affected column in the table. Direction of stops: where shown (eg: W-bound) this is the compass direction towards which the bus is pointing when it stops Mondays to Fridays Loughton, Loughton Station (Stop A) 0729 0833 33 1433 1536 1636 1742 1844 1934 2034 2134 2234 Loughton, adj Durnell Way 0736 0840 40 1440 1543 1643 1749 1849 1939 2039 2139 2239 Debden, nr Rectory Lane 0646 0742 0846 46 1446 1549 1649 1755 1855 1943 2043 2143 2243 Abridge, opp Field Close 0752 0856then 56 1456 1559 1700 1806 1905 Abridge, o/s The Blue Boar 0651 at 1950 2050 2150 2250 Abridge, New Farm Drive (NE-bound) 0754 0858these 58 1458 1601 1702 1808 1907 Abridge, o/s Roding Hall 0756 0900mins 00until 1500 1603 1704 1810 1909 Theydon Bois, adj Theydon Bois Green 0655 0800 0904past 04 1504 1607 1708 1814 1913 1956 2056 2156 2256 Ivy Chimneys, adj Meadow View 0700 0805 0909each 09 1509 1612 1713 1819 1918 2000 2100 2200 2300 Epping, o/s Epping Station arr 0704 0809 0913hour 13 1513 1616 1717 1823 1922 2004 2104 2204 2304 Epping, o/s Epping Station dep 0704 0809 0913 13 1513 1618 1719 1825 1922 2004 2104 2204 2304 Epping, o/s Church 0707 0812 0916 16 1516 1621 1722 1828 2006 2106 2206 2306 Epping, inside St.
    [Show full text]
  • Epping Forest District Questionnaire for Essex County Council
    Epping Forest District Questionnaire for Essex County Council Local Bus Network Review Consultation August 2016 Background In 2015 Essex County Council (ECC) began a thorough review of its financial support for those local bus services that it pays for across the County. This consultation is the start of the second part of the review and looks at 70 services across Essex where the current contract ends in 2017. We have grouped together services by geographical area of the County so it is easy to see whether your service is part of the review. Most bus services in Essex are run by commercial operators. The County Council’s role is to decide, where the commercial operators do not provide a service, whether one is needed and if it determines that one is, then to provide it. To help make this decision ECC looks at many factors including what alternatives are available, how many people use them and whether they offer value for money. The Council will not normally continue to support a service where it pays the operator £5.00 or more per passenger carried after all revenue (from fares of all types including the concessionary bus pass scheme) has been taken into account. This is the Cost Per Passenger Journey (CPPJ). A number of the services in this review were last tendered in 2009/10 and the prices agreed then are therefore relatively low compared to prices today. In addition ECC has not increased many of its fares since 2009. As a result a number of bus services in this review are currently close to or exceeding the £5.00 CPPJ upper support limit and are very likely to exceed it after tender.
    [Show full text]
  • Epping Forest District Council Local Highways Panel Meeting Agenda
    EPPING FOREST DISTRICT COUNCIL LOCAL HIGHWAYS PANEL MEETING AGENDA Date: 20th March 2019 Time: 17:00 Venue: 25 Hemnall Street Epping CM16 4L Chairman: Cllr V Metcalfe Panel Cllr C Whitbread (Vice Chairman, Cllr C Pond, Cllr R Gadsby, Members: Cllr A Jackson, Cllr M McEwen, Cllr G Mohindra, Cllr P Keska (EFDC), Cllr C Roberts (EFDC), Cllr E Webster (EFDC) Barbara Scruton (Parish Representative) Attendees: Cllr S Kane (EFDC) Cllr Nigel Avey (EFDC) Officers: Essex Highways Officer Sarah Alcock- Highway Liaison Officer Essex Highways Officer David Gollop- Design Manager North Essex Parking Partnership – Paul Seabright – Area Manager EFDC Kim Durrani, Assistant Director Secretariat: Jackie Leither (EFDC) Page Item Subject Lead Paper 1 Welcome & Introductions Chairman Verbal 2 Apologies for Absence Chairman Verbal Declarations of Interest 1-10 3 Minutes of meeting held on 23rd January 2019 to be agreed as a Chairman correct record 4 Matters Arising from Minutes of the previous meeting Chairman Verbal 11-18 5 Approved Works Programme HLO Report 1 19-40 6 Potential Schemes List for consideration of the Panel in 2019-20 HLO Report 2 • Direct Delivery Discussion 7 Appendix (for information) 41-49 • Safer Road Schemes 2019-20 HLO Verbal • Surveys and VAS repairs • Highways Rangers • Section 106 Schemes 8 Any other business Chairman Verbal • LHP Paperwork Discussions 9 Date of next meeting: TBC Chairman Verbal 20th March 2019 Epping Forest District 20th March 2019 Epping Forest District Epping Forest District LOCAL HIGHWAYS PANEL MINUTES 23 January
    [Show full text]
  • 3.0 THORNWOOD COMMON FRINGES 3.1 Overview 3.2 Visual
    3.0 THORNWOOD COMMON FRINGES 3.1 Overview 3.1.1 Thornwood Common is situated to the northeast of Epping, north of Coopersale and west of North Weald Bassett. The settlement is predominantly situated within Epping Green Farmland Plateau Landscape Character Area (C9), with the southern edge of the village within North Weald Ridges and Valleys Landscape Character Area (F5). 3.1.2 The western landscape setting of Thornwood encompasses a patchwork of small, medium and large-scale fields that are lined with hedgerows. To the north of the settlement, mature field trees are also a feature. Similarly, medium to large-scale arable fields line the eastern edge of the settlement. To the east, however, the corridor of the M11 motorway introduces a source of noise and movement. 3.1.3 At the southern edge of the village, dense, mature woodland within the Lower Forest provides a strong sense of enclosure and also provides physical and visual separation from the settlements of Coopersale and Epping to the south. 3.2 Visual Character 3.2.1 The analysis of key visual characteristics and attributes that contribute to variations in the overall character of the landscape within the fringes of Thornwood Common are illustrated on Figure 3.1 and described in summary below: The majority of the settlement edges are lined with mature hedgerows, trees or large blocks of woodland, which create soft, green edges; There is a small patch of harsh urban edge at the northern edge of the settlement where low or gappy hedgerows within the back gardens allow short distance
    [Show full text]
  • Epping Forest District Council Local Highways
    EPPING FOREST DISTRICT COUNCIL LOCAL HIGHWAYS PANEL MEETING AGENDA Date: 4th September 2019 Time: 17:00 Venue: Committee Room 2, Epping Forest District Council Offices Chairman: Cllr V Metcalfe (ECC) Panel Cllr C Whitbread (Vice Chairman - ECC), Cllr C Pond (ECC), Cllr R Gadsby (ECC), Members: Cllr A Jackson (ECC), Cllr M McEwen (ECC), Cllr G Mohindra (ECC), Cllr P Keska (EFDC), Cllr D Wixley (EFDC), Cllr S Kane (EFDC), Cllr A Lion (EFDC) Barbara Scruton (Parish Representative) Attendees: Cllr N Avey (EFDC) Officers: Essex Highways Officer Sarah Alcock- Highway Liaison Officer Essex Highways Officer David Gollop- Design Manager EFDC Kim Durrani, Assistant Director Secretariat: Jackie Leither (EFDC) Page Item Subject Lead Paper 1 Welcome & Introductions Chairman Verbal 2 Apologies for Absence & Declarations of Interest Chairman Verbal 1-8 3 Minutes of meeting held on 10th June 2019 to be agreed Chairman as a correct record 4 Matters Arising from Minutes of the previous meeting Chairman Verbal 5 Presentation on 20mph schemes HLO Verbal 6 Report on Funded Schemes HLO Report 1 9-18 • 2018-19 • Match Funded • 2019-20 19-32 7 Report on Schemes Awaiting Future Funding HLO Report 2 8 Report on Revenue Spend (electronically only) HLO Verbal • Highways Rangers • Traffic Surveys • VAS Maintenance 9 Report on S106 (electronically only) HLO Verbal 10 Any other business Chairman Verbal 11 Date of next meeting: 15th January 2020 5pm Committee Chairman Verbal Room 2 4th September 2019 Epping Forest District 4th September 2019 Epping Forest District Epping
    [Show full text]