WATS I Proceedings V

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

WATS I Proceedings V PROCEEDINGS OF THE WESTERN ATLANTIC TURTLE SYMPOSIUM San Jose, Costa Rica 17-22 July 1983 ENGLISH EDITION VOLUME 2 Appendix 6 ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY OF SEA TURTLE RESEARCH IN THE WESTERN ATLANTIC PROCEEDINGS OF THE WESTERN ATLANTIC TURTLE SYMPOSIUM EDITORS Peter Bacon Fred Berry Karen Bjorndal Harold Hirth Larry Ogren Michael Weber SYMPOSIUM ON SEA TURTLE RESEARCH OF THE WESTERN ATLANTIC (POPULATIONS AND SOCIOECONOMICS) 17-22 July 1983 San José, Costa Rica Sponsored By The INTERGOVERNMENTAL OCEANOGRAPHIC COMMISSION ASSOCIATION FOR THE CARIBBEAN AND ADJACENT REGIONS Supported By The FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Published By RSMAS PRINTING MIAMI, FL 33149 USA APRIL 1984 In Cooperation With The GULF AND CARIBBEAN FISHERIES INSTITUTE Distributed By The CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION 624 9th Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001 USA With a grant from the U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service, WIDECAST has digitized the databases and proceedings of the Western Atlantic Turtle Symposium (WATS) with the hope that the revitalized documents might provide a useful historical context for contemporary sea turtle management and con- servation efforts in the Western Atlantic Region. With the stated objective of serving “as a starting point for the identification of critical areas where it will be necessary to concentrate all efforts in the future”, the first Western Atlantic Turtle Symposium con- vened in Costa Rica (17-22 July 1983), and the second in Puerto Rico four years later (12-16 October 1987). WATS I featured National Reports from 43 political jurisdictions; 37 presented at WATS II. WATS I opened with these words: “The talks which we started today have the multiple purpose of bringing our knowledge up to date about the biological peculiarities of the marine turtle populations of the western Atlantic; to know and analyse the scope of the National Reports prepared by the scientific and technical personnel of more than thirty nations of the region; to consider options for the orderly management of marine turtle populations; and in general to provide an adequate forum for the ex- change of experiences among scientists, administrators, and individuals interested in making contri- butions for the preservation of this important natural resource.” A quarter-century has passed, and the results of these historic meetings have been lost to science and to a new generation of managers and conservationists. Their unique importance in providing baseline data remains unrecognized, and their potential as a “starting point” is neither known nor appreciated. The proceedings document what was known at the time concerning the status and distribution of nest- ing and foraging habitat, population size and trend, mortality factors, official statistics on exploitation and trade, estimated incidental catch, employment dependent on turtles, mariculture operations, public and private institutions concerned with conservation and use, legal aspects (e.g. regulations, enforce- ment, protected areas), and active research projects. In most cases it was the first time a national sea turtle assessment had been conducted. Despite the potential value of this information to agencies responsible for conducting stock assess- ments, monitoring recovery trends, and safeguarding critical habitat in the 21st century, the hand- written National Reports, largely illegible in the published proceedings, have slipped into obscurity. To help ensure the legacy of these symposia, we have digitized the entire proceedings, including the National Reports, plenary presentations and panels, and annotated bibliographies of both meetings, and posted them online at http://www.widecast.org/What/RegionalPrograms.html. Each National Report, as well as this Proceedings volume, has been scanned from the original docu- ment. Errors in the scan have been corrected; however, to be true to the original content (as closely as we can discern it), potential errors of content have not been corrected. This article should be cited: Bacon, P., F. Berry, K. Bjorndal. H. Hirth, L. Ogren, and M. Weber (Editors). 1984. Proceedings of the Western Atlantic Turtle Symposium, 17-22 July 1983, San José. Volume II: Annotated Biblio- graphy of Sea Turtle Research in the Western Atlantic. RSMAS Printing, Miami. 318 pp. Karen L. Eckert WIDECAST Executive Director June 2009 ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY of SEA TURTLE RESEARCH in the WESTERN CENTRAL ATLANTIC Peter R. Bacon University of the West Indies Jamaica June 1983 This Annotated Bibliography of Sea Turtle Research in the Western Central Atlantic has been prepared as a background document for the Western Atlantic Turtle Symposium (WATS), July 1983, San José, Costa Rica. It contains references to sea turtle research, populations and socio-economics. Collection of references has been in progress for some time, but the major work of annotation and cross ref- erencing was carried out between November 1982 and May 1983. Only papers received up to the end of May 1983 are included here. Financial support for this Bibliography was provided by FAO, through their Fishery Resources & Environment Division, whose help is gratefully acknowledged. Sources of information Published information on sea turtles was obtained from a variety of sources: (a) Bibliographies Bonnet, B. 1979. Introduction bibliographique a la physiologie de la tortue verte, Chelonia mydas (L.), avec references complementaires recentes - 1974 a 1979 - sur l'ecologie, l'exploitation et la protection de l'espece. Collection Travaux et Documents, No.4; UER Sciences. Carr, A.F., Iverson, J.B. & Jackson, D. 1979. Sea Turtle Bibliography, Worldwide 1974 - 77 (Draft). Center for Natural Areas, Maine, 14 pages. v Dodd, C.K. 1979. A Bibliography of endangered and threatened amphibians and reptiles in the United States and its territories (Conservation, distribution, natural history, status). Smithsonian Herpetological Information Service, No. 46; 35 pages. (Plus various Supplements). E.S.I.C. 1980. Bibliography of sea turtles. Prepared by the Environmental Science Information Center, National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration, Rockville, Maryland, Nov. 1980. FAO 1979 Turtle: Library & Documentation Division - ISIS Batch Retrieval, Data Base & Bibliography13/08/79; 10 pages. Rebel, T.P. 1974. Sea Turtles and the turtle industry of the West Indies, Florida and the Gulf of Mexico, University of Miami Press, 250 pages. Bibliography, pages 143 - 236. (b) Symposia & Meetings Papers delivered at a number of Symposia, Conferences, Workshops and Society Meetings have been included only when these have been published in "Proceedings". These appear in the Bibliography by author, and the Proceedings are cited by editor. (c) Libraries The author is grateful for access to and assistance received in the libraries of the University of the West Indies; The British Museum of Natural History, London; National Marine Fisheries Service, Miami and Panama City, Florida; and the University of Florida, Gainesville. Thanks are due to Professor A. Carr, Ms. J. Mortimer & Ms. A. Meylan, University of Florida, Gainesville, for access to their personal libraries. vi Types of publications consulted This Bibliography contains 954 annotated reference citations, which were derived from the following publications: Scientific journals 604 Books 56 Theses 12 Newsletters 36 Government Reports 116 Miscellaneous 130 The last category includes conference proceedings, reports to the international agencies and manuscript reports. References were published in the following languages: English 841 Spanish 64 French 19 Dutch 13 Portuguese 8 German 8 Danish 1 vii Scope of the Bibliography As far as possible, only references relevant to the Western Central Atlantic Region have been included. This region is as defined by WECAFC/FAO - Fishing Area 31 - and extends approximately from Latitudes 35°N to 10°S, and Longitude 20°E to the coastline of the Americas. This definition excludes parts of Brazil and the United States of America and Ascension Island, while including Bermuda. Consequently, references to sea turtles in the southern parts of Brazil and US states north of the Carolinas have usually been omitted from this Bibliography. For ease of treatment in the geographical indexing, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands are given separately from mainland USA. Isla Aves is listed with Venezuela, however, as are the Colombian islands of San Andres and Providencia listed with Colombia, as much less information was available for these islands. A number of general reference works on sea turtle biology, and some on physiology and taxonomy, are included where the research was carried out in the Region or where the data is of importance to the WATS symposium objectives. The Bibliography contains the following numbers of references to the six sea turtle species found in the Region: Chelonia mydas 332 Caretta caretta 254 Dermochelys coriacea 187 Eretmochelys imbricata 134 Lepidochelys kempi 124 Lepidochelys olivacea 61 viii Published works are included from the earliest paper in 1731 up to 1983. There was a dramatic increase in sea turtle research in the 1970's as the following listing of date of publication shows: Year of Publication Number of papers Before 1900 21 1900 - 1909 15 1910 - 1919 10 1920 - 1929 12 1930 - 1939 16 1940 - 1949 29 1950 - 1959 52 1960 - 1969 169 1970 - 1979 401 1980 - 1983 223 + 6 undated References to sea turtle research in the United States of America dominated the geographical citations, as shown: Country Number of papers
Recommended publications
  • 15 Sea Turtle Epibiosis
    15 Sea Turtle Epibiosis Michael G. Frick and joseph B. Pfaller CONTENTS 15. I Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 399 15.2 Common Forms .................................................................................................................... 401 15.2.1 Sessile Forms ............................................................................................................ 401 15.2.2 Sedentary Forms ....................................................................................................... 401 15.2.3 Motile Forms ............................................................................................................ 401 15.3 Communities and Community Dynamics ............................................................................ 402 15.3.1 Pelagic/Oceanic Communities .................................................................................. 402 15.3.2 Benthic/Neritic Communities ................................................................................... 402 15.3.3 Obligate Communities .............................................................................................. 403 15.3.4 Community Distribution ........................................................................................... 403 15.3.5 Community Succession ............................................................................................ 404 15.4 Ecological Interactions ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bryozoan Studies 2019
    BRYOZOAN STUDIES 2019 Edited by Patrick Wyse Jackson & Kamil Zágoršek Czech Geological Survey 1 BRYOZOAN STUDIES 2019 2 Dedication This volume is dedicated with deep gratitude to Paul Taylor. Throughout his career Paul has worked at the Natural History Museum, London which he joined soon after completing post-doctoral studies in Swansea which in turn followed his completion of a PhD in Durham. Paul’s research interests are polymatic within the sphere of bryozoology – he has studied fossil bryozoans from all of the geological periods, and modern bryozoans from all oceanic basins. His interests include taxonomy, biodiversity, skeletal structure, ecology, evolution, history to name a few subject areas; in fact there are probably none in bryozoology that have not been the subject of his many publications. His office in the Natural History Museum quickly became a magnet for visiting bryozoological colleagues whom he always welcomed: he has always been highly encouraging of the research efforts of others, quick to collaborate, and generous with advice and information. A long-standing member of the International Bryozoology Association, Paul presided over the conference held in Boone in 2007. 3 BRYOZOAN STUDIES 2019 Contents Kamil Zágoršek and Patrick N. Wyse Jackson Foreword ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 Caroline J. Buttler and Paul D. Taylor Review of symbioses between bryozoans and primary and secondary occupants of gastropod
    [Show full text]
  • Symbiosis and Parasitism in the Crustacea1)
    CHAPTER 16 SYMBIOSIS AND PARASITISM IN THE CRUSTACEA1) BY JEAN-PAUL TRILLES AND RÉGINE HIPEAU-JACQUOTTE Contents. – Introduction. Crustaceans as parasites and symbionts – Diversity of the associations encountered – Associations with a permanent or temporary character – The consequences of living in association. The parasites of crustaceans. Appendix. Bibliography. INTRODUCTION Many Crustacea live in some kind of association with other living beings, either animals or plants. In some cases, such a relation would seem the result of accidental, merely occasional encounters: specimens of Volvox, chironomid larvae, and certain ostracodes that are sometimes found in the brood pouch of daphniid Branchiopoda can only be qualified as ‘strays’. For other organisms, in contrast, we can observe true relationships that are often complex and as yet only superficially known. In such cases of true association, quite exact and stringent rules prevail that determine the delicate, yet not infrequently obligate, relationship between the associates at issue. For generations, biologists have attempted to classify those associations into categories. The criterion that was most often applied concerned the exchange, either unilateral or bilateral, between the two associates and included the effects of either profit or harm, even damage. Obviously, teleological and/or anthropomorphic reasoning can easily influence such an approach. The results, thus, were primarily speculative and vague, and the relationships recognized were grossly described as of two types that could relatively easily be determined, i.e., either involving spatial relationships (shelter, protection), or nutritional associations. 1) The original text was updated by Jean-Paul Trilles in May 2008. © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2012 Crustacea 3 (16): 239-317 240 J.-P.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Survey of the United States Virgin Islands
    United States In cooperation with Department of the Virgin Islands Agriculture Department of Planning Soil Survey of and Natural Resources; the Natural Virgin Islands Cooperative the United States Resources Extension Service; and the Conservation United States Department Service of Interior, National Park Virgin Islands Service 3 How to Use This Soil Survey General Soil Map The general soil map, which is the color map preceding the detailed soil maps, shows the survey area divided into groups of associated soils called general soil map units. This map is useful in planning the use and management of large areas. To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the map, identify the name of the map unit in the area on the color-coded map legend, then refer to the section General Soil Map Units for a general description of the soils in your area. Detailed Soil Maps The detailed soil maps follow the general soil map. These maps can be useful in planning the use and management of small areas. To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the Index to Map Sheets, which precedes the soil maps. Note the number of the map sheet and turn to that sheet. Locate your area of interest on the map sheet. Note the map units symbols that are in that area. Turn to the Contents, which lists the map units by symbol and name and shows the page where each map unit is described. The Contents shows which table has data on a specific land use for each detailed soil map unit.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishery Management Plan, Regulatory Impact Review, and Final
    FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN, REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW, AND FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR CORALS AND REEF ASSOCIATED PLANTS AND INVERTEBRATES OF PUERTO RICO AND THE UNITED STATES VIRGIN ISLANDS CARIBBEAN FISHERY MANAGEMENT COUNCIL 268 Muñoz Rivera Avenue, Suite 1108 San Juan, Puerto Rico 00918-2577 July, 1994 IN MEMORIAM DR. CARLOS GOENAGA TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 DEFINITIONS 4 1.0 INTRODUCTION 7 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF RESOURCE 8 2.1 Corals 8 2.1.1 Class Hydrozoa 8 2.1.2 Class Anthozoa 9 2.1.2.1 Antipatharian anthozoans 9 2.1.2.2 Octocorallian anthozoans 9 2.1.2.3 Actinarian anthozoans 10 2.1.2.4 Scleractinian anthozoans 10 2.2 Live-Rock 13 2.2.1 Rubble-Rock 14 2.2.2 Algae-Rock 14 2.2.3 False-Coral 14 2.2.4 Sea-Mat 15 2.3 Invertebrates Associated with Reef and Coral Reefs 17 2.3.1 Porifera 17 2.3.2 Annelida 17 2.3.3 Mollusca 17 2.3.4 Arthropoda 19 2.3.5 Echinodermata 19 2.3.6 Bryozoa and Chordata 20 2.4 Marine Algae and Flowering Plants 21 2.5 Ecological Relationships 23 2.6 Fishery Management Unit 26 2.7 Distribution of Species in the Fishery Management Unit 26 2.8 Present Condition of Components of the FMU 30 2.8.1 Natural stressors 30 2.8.2 Anthropogenic stressors 31 2.8.2.1 Reefs 31 2.8.2.2 Seagrasses 36 2.9 Probable Condition of Habitat in the Future 37 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF FISHERY 38 3.1 History of Exploitation 38 3.2 Current Commercial Use 39 3.3 Current Recreational Use 41 3.4 Research and Medicine 43 3.5 Science and Education 44 3.6 User Conflicts 44 3.7 Landings and Value Information 44 3.8 Vessels, Gear, Employment
    [Show full text]
  • B U L L E T I N
    i.- U8s~18~ _B_U_L_L_E_T_IN ___ , OF NATURAL HISTORY~ ISLAND LISTS OF WEST INDIAN AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES Robert Powell and Robert W. Henderson, Editors Vol. 51, No.2, pp. 85-166 2012 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE l 136 BULLETIN FLORIDA MUSEUM NATURAL HISTORY VOL. 51 (2) PUERTO RICO AND THE VIRGIN ISLANDS Gregory C. Mayerl "The multitude of other islands in the group or in part, from that of Puerto Rico, to which they will well repay the visit of the zoologist, since belong politically. The St. Croix Bank, 40 km south the life of this section of the West Indies Calmot of St. Thomas (on the Puerto Rico Bank), consists be said to be known until all the cays and islets of St. Croix and four small islets. Its fauna shows have been investigated" (Wetmore 1927). considerable endemism, but also shares several Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands comprise over forms with the Puerto Rico Banle 150 islands for which herpetological records exist. About 100 species of reptiles and amphibians These islands are spread over five island banks: have been recorded from the area covered, of which the Mona Bank, the Monito Barlie, the Desecheo more than 20 have been introduced. The introduced Bank, the Puerto Rico Bank (also 1mown as Greater populations of Cyclura pinguis are deliberate Puerto Rico: Schmidt 1928), and the St. Croix Bank trans locations within the probable former range of (Fig. 8). The Puerto Rico Bank extends from the this endangered species (Lazell 2005). Mona Passage in the west to the Anegada Passage The following lists were compiled starting in the east.
    [Show full text]
  • CPB5 C14 WEB.Pdf
    540 ¢ U.S. Coast Pilot 5, Chapter 14 26 SEP 2021 64°30'W Chart Coverage in Coast Pilot 5—Chapter 14 NOAA’s Online Interactive Chart Catalog has complete chart coverage http://www.charts.noaa.gov/InteractiveCatalog/nrnc.shtml 65°W 64°45'W 25641 VIRGIN ISLAND 18°30'N Jost Van Dyke Island Tobago Island TORTOLA ST. THOMAS Peter Island SIR FRANCIS DRAKE CHANNEL ST. JOHN 25649 Norman Island 25647 PILLSBURY SOUND 18°15'N Charlotte Amalie MAR CARIBE 18°N 25644 25645 Christiansted 17°45'N Frederiksted Port Alucroix ST. CROIX 25641 17°30'N 26 SEP 2021 U.S. Coast Pilot 5, Chapter 14 ¢ 541 Virgin Islands (1) This chapter describes the United States Virgin peaks rising from the tableland of St. John (U.S.) to Islands, which include the islands of St. Thomas, St. heights of 800 to 1,300 feet. John and St. Croix and about 40 small islets or cays. (8) From about 20 miles north of the islands, a separation Information is given on the ports and harbors of the islands will be observed between St. Thomas and St. John, but including Charlotte Amalie, Christiansted, Port St. Croix, St. John, Jost Van Dyke, Tortola and Virgin Gorda will Cruz Bay and Frederiksted. A general description of the appear to be one large island. St. Thomas is less rugged British Virgin Islands is also included; more complete in outline than the other islands, but it may be recognized information is given in Pub. No. 147, Sailing Directions from its large midisland saddle that has horns nearly (Enroute), Caribbean Sea, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Assessment 12 July 2021
    The Ocean Cleanup Final Environmental Impact Assessment 12 July 2021 Prepared for: Prepared by: The Ocean Cleanup CSA Ocean Sciences, Inc. Batavierenstraat 15, 4-7th floor 8502 SW Kansas Avenue 3014 JH Rotterdam Stuart, Florida 34997 The Netherlands United States THE OCEAN CLEANUP DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT DOCUMENT NO. CSA-THEOCEANCLEANUP-FL-21-81581-3648-01-REP-01-FIN-REV01 Internal review process Version Date Description Prepared by: Reviewed by: Approved by: J. Tiggelaar Initial draft for A. Lawson B. Balcom INT-01 04/20/2021 K. Olsen science review G. Dodillet R. Cady K. Olen J. Tiggelaar INT-02 04/24/2021 TE review K. Metzger K. Olsen K. Olen Client deliverable Version Date Description Project Manager Approval 01 04/27/2021 Draft Chapters 1-4 K. Olsen Combined 02 05/07/2021 K. Olsen deliverable Incorporation of The Ocean Cleanup and 03 05/17/2021 K. Olsen Neuston Expert Comments Incorporate legal FIN 07/09/2021 comments and add K. Olsen additional 2 cruises FIN REV01 07/12/2021 Revised Final K. Olsen The electronic PDF version of this document is the Controlled Master Copy at all times. A printed copy is considered to be uncontrolled and it is the holder’s responsibility to ensure that they have the current version. Controlled copies are available upon request from the CSA Document Production Department. Executive Summary BACKGROUND The Ocean Cleanup has developed a new Ocean System (S002) which is made by a Retention System (RS) comprising two wings of 391 m in length each and a Retention Zone (RZ), that will be towed by two vessels to collect buoyant plastic debris from the within the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre (NPSG) located roughly midway between California and Hawaii.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Epibionts Associated with Lepidochelys Olivacea (Eschscholtz 1829) Sea Turtles Nesting in the Mexican South Pacific
    animals Article Diversity of Epibionts Associated with Lepidochelys olivacea (Eschscholtz 1829) Sea Turtles Nesting in the Mexican South Pacific Brenda Sarahí Ramos-Rivera 1 , Himmer Castro-Mondragon 1, José Gabriel Kuk-Dzul 1,2, Pedro Flores-Rodríguez 1 and Rafael Flores-Garza 1,* 1 Facultad de Ecología Marina, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Av. Las Palmas No. 20 Fraccionamiento las Playas, Acapulco de Juárez C.P. 39390, Mexico; [email protected] (B.S.R.-R.); [email protected] (H.C.-M.); [email protected] (J.G.K.-D.); pfl[email protected] (P.F.-R.) 2 Dirección de Cátedras-CONACYT, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT), Ciudad de México C.P. 03940, Mexico * Correspondence: rfl[email protected] Simple Summary: Epibionts are organisms that live or grow attached to other living beings, and sea turtles can be suitable habitat for these organisms because they provide a large and diverse substrate. They usually have interspecific relationships of the commensal type; however, some species become parasitic and may cause severe damage, mainly in soft areas. Epibionts provide us with information on the migratory habits of sea turtles and can indicate health status. There are several studies on epibionts and their relationships with sea turtles; however, it is essential to expand research to increase the knowledge that will allow us to comprehend these relationships and their implications. Citation: Ramos-Rivera, B.S.; In this study, we analyze the richness, abundance, diversity, prevalence, body distribution, and Castro-Mondragon, H.; Kuk-Dzul, interspecific relationships of epibionts with Lepidochelys olivacea turtles nesting in the Mexican South J.G.; Flores-Rodríguez, P.; Pacific, relate turtle size with the presence of epibionts, characterize the body distribution of epibionts, Flores-Garza, R.
    [Show full text]
  • Epibionts on Brachiopods from the Devonian Dundee Formation of Ohio
    EPIBIONTS ON BRACHIOPODS FROM THE DEVONIAN DUNDEE FORMATION OF OHIO Rituparna Bose A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December 2006 Committee: Margaret M. Yacobucci, Advisor Richard D. Hoare Don C. Steinker © 2006 Rituparna Bose All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Dr. Margaret M. Yacobucci, Advisor Epibionts seem to be more common in siliciclastic units than in carbonate units. To evaluate this difference, the paleontology of the Middle Devonian Dundee Formation has been explored. A total of 245 brachiopod specimens were collected from a fossiliferous horizon of the Dundee Formation exposed at Whitehouse Quarry and identified to the generic level. Brachiopod genera identified were Strophodonta, Rhipidomella, Rhynchotrema, Atrypa, and Mucrospirifer. All the brachiopod shells were examined under a stereomicroscope for evidence of epibionts, and preferred host taxa were determined. Epibionts are absent on all the brachiopod shells except some Rhipidomella shells. Further examination of these Rhipidomella shells under 100x magnification showed evidence of biotic interactions in 21 out of 48 specimens. Large boreholes were produced by worm borers, scars were left on a few specimens by worms, branching grooves were the traces of soft-bodied ctenostome bryozoans, and sheet-like encrustation was produced by an indeterminate group of bryozoans. Ctenostome bryozoans had a commensal relationship with their host while a few worms had a parasitic relation with the host. While one might expect encrustation on hardgrounds within this carbonate unit, field work has determined that much of the Dundee Formation was extensively bioturbated, implying a soft substrate.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Thomas/St. John St. Croix
    U.S. Virgin Islands Marine Resources and Fisheries Strategic and Comprehensive Conservation Plan 2005 UNITED STATES VIRGIN ISLANDS MARINE RESOURCES AND FISHERIES STRATEGIC AND COMPREHENSIVE CONSERVATION PLAN Division of Fish and Wildlife Department of Planning and Natural Resources U.S. Virgin Islands December 2005 U.S. Virgin Islands ii Marine Resources and Fisheries Strategic and Comprehensive Conservation Plan 2005 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The US Virgin Islands (USVI) is a territory of the United States. It lies in the northeast Caribbean and consists of four major islands, St. Thomas, St. John, St. Croix, and Water Island, and about 50 cays. The USVI is endowed with many natural resources and contains examples of tropical ecosystems such as coral reefs, seagrass meadows, salt ponds, and mangrove forests. These habitats provide food and shelter for a large variety of resident marine and terrestrial life. In addition, a variety of fish and wildlife migrate through the USVI annually. These natural resources are under pressure from a variety of user groups. The marine waters are heavily fished by both recreational and commercial fishermen. Annually, thousands of tourists visit the USVI to go snorkeling and diving. Pollution is also a primary impact on the marine resources. In addition, economic development such as home and hotel construction continues to infringe on coastal environments. There have been numerous plans completed, at least to draft stage, relating to some aspect of the fisheries and marine resources in the U.S. Virgin Islands (Chapter 1). Plans have been written regarding management of specific areas, topics and issues, and species related to the fisheries and marine resources of the USVI.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking a Trip with Microbes and Plankton. Subjects: Life Science / Biology, Environmental Science, Marine / Ocean Science Grades: 6-8
    W&M ScholarWorks Reports 2017 Microscopic Hitchhiking: Taking a Trip with Microbes and Plankton. Subjects: Life Science / Biology, Environmental Science, Marine / Ocean Science Grades: 6-8 Lucia Safi Virginia Institute of Marine Science Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/reports Part of the Animal Sciences Commons, Biology Commons, Marine Biology Commons, and the Science and Mathematics Education Commons Recommended Citation Safi, L. (2017) Microscopic Hitchhiking: Taking a Trip with Microbes and Plankton. Subjects: Life Science / Biology, Environmental Science, Marine / Ocean Science Grades: 6-8. VA SEA 2017 Lesson Plans. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary. https://doi.org/10.21220/V5WJ0Z This Report is brought to you for free and open access by W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Reports by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Microscopic hitchhiking: Taking a trip with microbes and plankton Lúcia Safi Virginia Institute of Marine Science Grade Level Middle School Subject area Life Science, Biology, or Environmental Science This work is sponsored by the National Estuarine Research Reserve System Science Collaborative, which supports collaborative research that addresses coastal management problems important to the reserves. The Science Collaborative is funded by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and managed by the University of Michigan Water Center. 1. Activity Title: Microscopic hitchhiking: taking a trip with microbes and plankton. 2. Focus: The main focus of this class is to work concepts on food webs and ecological relationships, giving special attention to microbes and Chesapeake Bay species and dynamics.
    [Show full text]