DOCSLIB.ORG

Fishery Management Plan, Regulatory Impact Review, and Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fishery Management Plan, Regulatory Impact Review, and Final FISHERY MANAGEMENT PLAN, REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW, AND FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR CORALS AND REEF ASSOCIATED PLANTS AND INVERTEBRATES OF PUERTO RICO AND THE UNITED STATES VIRGIN ISLANDS CARIBBEAN FISHERY MANAGEMENT COUNCIL 268 Muñoz Rivera Avenue, Suite 1108 San Juan, Puerto Rico 00918-2577 July, 1994 IN MEMORIAM DR. CARLOS GOENAGA TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 DEFINITIONS 4 1.0 INTRODUCTION 7 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF RESOURCE 8 2.1 Corals 8 2.1.1 Class Hydrozoa 8 2.1.2 Class Anthozoa 9 2.1.2.1 Antipatharian anthozoans 9 2.1.2.2 Octocorallian anthozoans 9 2.1.2.3 Actinarian anthozoans 10 2.1.2.4 Scleractinian anthozoans 10 2.2 Live-Rock 13 2.2.1 Rubble-Rock 14 2.2.2 Algae-Rock 14 2.2.3 False-Coral 14 2.2.4 Sea-Mat 15 2.3 Invertebrates Associated with Reef and Coral Reefs 17 2.3.1 Porifera 17 2.3.2 Annelida 17 2.3.3 Mollusca 17 2.3.4 Arthropoda 19 2.3.5 Echinodermata 19 2.3.6 Bryozoa and Chordata 20 2.4 Marine Algae and Flowering Plants 21 2.5 Ecological Relationships 23 2.6 Fishery Management Unit 26 2.7 Distribution of Species in the Fishery Management Unit 26 2.8 Present Condition of Components of the FMU 30 2.8.1 Natural stressors 30 2.8.2 Anthropogenic stressors 31 2.8.2.1 Reefs 31 2.8.2.2 Seagrasses 36 2.9 Probable Condition of Habitat in the Future 37 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF FISHERY 38 3.1 History of Exploitation 38 3.2 Current Commercial Use 39 3.3 Current Recreational Use 41 3.4 Research and Medicine 43 3.5 Science and Education 44 3.6 User Conflicts 44 3.7 Landings and Value Information 44 3.8 Vessels, Gear, Employment and Marketing 45 3.9 International Activities 47 i 4.0 CAPACITY LIMITS 47 5.0 PROBLEMS IN THE FISHERY 48 5.1 Overfishing 48 5.1.1 Stony Corals, Octocorals, Live-Rock and Seagrasses 48 5.1.2 Other Reef-associated Invertebrates 49 5.2 Lack of Management 49 5.3 Lack of Effective Environmental Policies/ Enforcement 50 5.4 Inappropriate Harvest Techniques and Holding Facilities 51 5.5 Inadequate Information Base 51 5.6 Limited Public Information/Education 52 5.7 Habitat Loss and Degradation 52 5.8 User Conflicts 52 6.0 MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES 53 7.0 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 54 7.1 Management Measures Proposed 54 7.1.1 Management Measure 1 54 7.1.2 Management Measure 2 55 7.1.3 Management Measure 3 57 7.1.4 Management Measure 4 58 7.1.5 Management Measure 5 59 7.1.6 Management Measure 6 61 7.1.7 Management Measure 7 61 7.1.8 Management Measure 8 (RESERVED) 62 7.2 Procedure for Adjusting Management Measures 62 7.3 Future Management Considerations 63 7.3.1 Marine Conservation Districts 64 7.3.2 Quotas, Limited Entry and Harvest Prohibitions 65 7.3.3 Handling and Transportation of Live Organisms 66 7.3.4 Introduction of Exotic Marine Organisms 67 7.4 Data Collection and Research Requirement 67 7.5 Special Recommendations and Endorsement of State Actions 68 7.5.1 Recommendations 68 7.5.2 Endorsement 69 7.6 Public Education and Awareness 70 7.7 International Considerations 70 8.0 RELATED MANAGEMENT JURISDICTIONS, LAWS AND POLICIES 71 8.1 Federal Laws, Policies and Regulations 71 8.2 Local Laws, Policies and Regulations 74 8.3 Management Institutions 77 8.3.1 Federal Management Institutions 77 8.3.2 State Management Institutions 80 8.4 International Treaties and Agreements 80 ii 9.0 OTHER APPLICABLE LAWS AND REQUIREMENTS 81 9.1 Effect on Wetlands 81 9.2 Vessel Safety 81 9.3 Paperwork Reduction Act 81 9.3.1 Proposed Data Collection Program 82 9.3.2 Estimate of Reporting Burden and Cost 82 9.3.3 Coastal Zone Management Consistency 82 9.3.4 Federalism 82 9.3.5 Social Impact Assessment 83 10.0 MAJOR ISSUES DISCUSSED AT PUBLIC HEARINGS 83 11.0 REFERENCES 84 LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES Table 1 Species in the Fishery Management Unit 93 Table 2 Reported numbers of individuals of invertebrates exported from Puerto Rico 99 Table 3 Reported numbers of boxes of marine fish and invertebrates exported from Puerto Rico 101 Figure 1 Distribution of substrate type by coast and by depth 102 Figure 2 Distribution of live and submerged reefs on the insular shelf, Isla Caja de Muertos area, southern Puerto Rico 103 Figure 3 Live invertebrates exported from Puerto Rico: 1990-1992 104 Figure 4 Proposed MCDs for Puerto Rico 105 Figure 5 Proposed MCD for St. Croix, U.S.V.I. 106 APPENDIX A: Species excluded from the FMU 107 APPENDIX 1: The state of Puerto Rico and U. S. Virgin Island corals APPENDIX 2: A preliminary assessment of marine aquarium organisms APPENDIX 3: Regulatory Impact Review APPENDIX 4: Final Environmental Impact Statement iii ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS DOCUMENT AP Advisory Panel CFMC Caribbean Fishery Management Council CITES Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora CPUE Catch-per-unit-effort COE Corps of Engineers CZMA Coastal Zone Management Act CZMP Coastal Zone Management Program DAH Domestic Allowable (Annual) Harvest DNER Department of Natural and Environmental Resources (Puerto Rico) (Previously known as Department of Natural Resources - DNR) DPNR Department of Planning and Natural Resources (U.S.V.I.) EEZ Exclusive Economic Zone EIS Environmental Impact Statement EO Executive Order EPA Environmental Protection Agency EQB Environmental Quality Board FMFC Florida Marine Fishery Commission FMP Fishery Management Plan FMU Fishery Management Unit FRL Fisheries Research Laboratory of the DNRE FWS Fish and Wildlife Service GIFA Governing International Fishery Agreement GMSAF Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic Fisheries IDEA International Diving Education Association MCD Marine Conservation District MMS Minerals Management Service MPRSA Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act MSY Maximum Sustainable Yield NAUI National Association of Underwater Instructors NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service NOAA National Oceanographic Atmospheric Administration NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NPS National Park Service OCRM Office of Coastal Resource Management OY Optimum Yield PADI Professional Association of Diving Instructors PMP Preliminary Management Plan P.R. Puerto Rico iv RIR Regulatory Impact Review RTSC Recreational Training SCUBA Council SAFE Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation SAS Special Aquatic Sites SCUBA Self Contained Underwater Breathing Apparatus SIA Social Impact Assessment SSC Scientific and Statistical Committee SSI Scuba Schools International STPs Secondary Treatment Plants TALFF Total Allowable Level of Foreign Fishing USCG United States Coast Guard USGS United States Geological Service U.S.V.I. United States Virgin Islands v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for corals and reef-associated plants and invertebrates includes over 100 species of coral (including stony corals, sea fans and gorgonians) and over 60 species of plants (including seagrasses) and invertebrates. The Plan covers two distinct components. The first is a fishery for live invertebrates which are marketed for the marine aquarium trade. Aside from reef-associated invertebrates, this fishery includes what is widely known as live-rock - rock substrate supporting diverse invertebrate life forms. Live-rock is highly valued by aquarists and there is a rapidly growing market for this resource. The second component of the Plan comprises corals and coral reefs. These resources are of enormous value for the reef communities that they support, for their physical capacity to protect coastlines and for their aesthetic value. Indeed traditional coastal fisheries in the Caribbean may best be characterized as coral reef fisheries intimately dependent on the backbone of habitats created by coral reefs and associated invertebrates. Corals and invertebrate communities not only comprise the physical basis of the reef ecosystem and the fish and invertebrate resources that depend on it, but also exhibit considerable beauty. This means that they are not only essential for the persistence of commercial and recreational fisheries, but are also of incalculable value for tourism and other recreational activities. It also means that, because of their slow regeneration rates and limited distribution on the insular platform of Puerto Rico and the U. S. Virgin Islands, many species are extremely vulnerable to unregulated harvest by commercial and amateur collectors and damage from growing tourist activity. Furthermore, because of their largely sedentary nature, they are unable to escape the impact of a variety of anthropogenic activities, including anchoring and pollution. Because current scientific evidence indicates that corals and certain other reef-associated invertebrates are extremely slow-growing, at least as measured against human time horizons, it is widely believed that their removal through harvest is likely to result in the net loss of these resources. Hence, corals and resources like them are essentially non-renewable in the typical fishery sense. Since they provide the Nation with substantial economic benefits unrelated to direct harvest, there appears to be little doubt that their greatest value lies in non-consumptive uses. Moreover, it is not clear whether typical fishery management approaches directly apply to reef resources and such standard measures have yet to be evaluated. In the meantime, given the current rates of degradation of coral reefs, their limited distribution and the consequent potential for their overexploitation, and the growing demand for reef-associated invertebrates, a decidedly conservative management approach must be applied. Scarcity of biological and harvest data is no excuse for lack of management. The Plan was developed largely for two reasons. The first concerned the increasingly serious impacts of anthropogenic activities on the condition of coral reefs and the communities of organisms with which they are closely associated in both Puerto Rico and the U.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Regional Studies in Marine Science Reef Condition and Protection Of
    Regional Studies in Marine Science 32 (2019) 100893 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Regional Studies in Marine Science journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/rsma Reef condition and protection of coral diversity and evolutionary history in the marine protected areas of Southeastern Dominican Republic ∗ Camilo Cortés-Useche a,b, , Aarón Israel Muñiz-Castillo a, Johanna Calle-Triviño a,b, Roshni Yathiraj c, Jesús Ernesto Arias-González a a Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del I.P.N., Unidad Mérida B.P. 73 CORDEMEX, C.P. 97310, Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico b Fundación Dominicana de Estudios Marinos FUNDEMAR, Bayahibe, Dominican Republic c ReefWatch Marine Conservation, Bandra West, Mumbai 400050, India article info a b s t r a c t Article history: Changes in structure and function of coral reefs are increasingly significant and few sites in the Received 18 February 2019 Caribbean can tolerate local and global stress factors. Therefore, we assessed coral reef condition Received in revised form 20 September 2019 indicators in reefs within and outside of MPAs in the southeastern Dominican Republic, considering Accepted 15 October 2019 benthic cover as well as the composition, diversity, recruitment, mortality, bleaching, the conservation Available online 18 October 2019 status and evolutionary distinctiveness of coral species. In general, we found that reef condition Keywords: indicators (coral and benthic cover, recruitment, bleaching, and mortality) within the MPAs showed Coral reefs better conditions than in the unprotected area (Boca Chica). Although the comparison between the Caribbean Boca Chica area and the MPAs may present some spatial imbalance, these zones were chosen for Biodiversity the purpose of making a comparison with a previous baseline presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Material
    Supplementary Material SM1. Post-Processing of Images for Automated Classification Imagery was collected without artificial light and using a fisheye lens to maximise light capture, therefore each image needed to be processed prior annotation in order to balance colour and to minimise the non-linear distortion introduced by the fisheye lens (Figure S1). Initially, colour balance and lenses distortion correction were manually applied on the raw images using Photoshop (Adobe Systems, California, USA). However, in order to optimize the manual post-processing time of thousands of images, more recent images from the Indian Ocean and Pacific Ocean were post- processed using compressed images (jpeg format) and an automatic batch processing in Photoshop and ImageMagick, the latter an open-source software for image processing (www.imagemagick.org). In view of this, the performance of the automated image annotation on images without colour balance was contrasted against images colour balanced using manual post-processing (on raw images) and the automatic batch processing (on jpeg images). For this evaluation, the error metric described in the main text (Materials and Methods) was applied to the images from following regions: the Maldives and the Great Barrier Reef (Figures S2 and S3). We found that the colour balance applied regardless the type of processing (manual vs automatic) had an important beneficial effect on the performance of the automated image annotation as errors were reduced for critical labels in both regions (e.g., Algae labels; Figures S2 and S3). Importantly, no major differences in the performance of the automated annotations were observed between manual and automated adjustments for colour balance.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Fish and Invertebrates Listed in the CITES Appendices
    JOINTS NATURE \=^ CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Checklist of fish and mvertebrates Usted in the CITES appendices JNCC REPORT (SSN0963-«OStl JOINT NATURE CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Report distribution Report Number: No. 238 Contract Number/JNCC project number: F7 1-12-332 Date received: 9 June 1995 Report tide: Checklist of fish and invertebrates listed in the CITES appendices Contract tide: Revised Checklists of CITES species database Contractor: World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 ODL Comments: A further fish and invertebrate edition in the Checklist series begun by NCC in 1979, revised and brought up to date with current CITES listings Restrictions: Distribution: JNCC report collection 2 copies Nature Conservancy Council for England, HQ, Library 1 copy Scottish Natural Heritage, HQ, Library 1 copy Countryside Council for Wales, HQ, Library 1 copy A T Smail, Copyright Libraries Agent, 100 Euston Road, London, NWl 2HQ 5 copies British Library, Legal Deposit Office, Boston Spa, Wetherby, West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ 1 copy Chadwick-Healey Ltd, Cambridge Place, Cambridge, CB2 INR 1 copy BIOSIS UK, Garforth House, 54 Michlegate, York, YOl ILF 1 copy CITES Management and Scientific Authorities of EC Member States total 30 copies CITES Authorities, UK Dependencies total 13 copies CITES Secretariat 5 copies CITES Animals Committee chairman 1 copy European Commission DG Xl/D/2 1 copy World Conservation Monitoring Centre 20 copies TRAFFIC International 5 copies Animal Quarantine Station, Heathrow 1 copy Department of the Environment (GWD) 5 copies Foreign & Commonwealth Office (ESED) 1 copy HM Customs & Excise 3 copies M Bradley Taylor (ACPO) 1 copy ^\(\\ Joint Nature Conservation Committee Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Keys…
    What Do We Know? • Florida Keys… − Stony coral benthic cover declined by 40% from 1996 – 2009 (Ruzicka et al. 2013). − Potential Driving Factor? Stress due to extreme cold & warm water temperatures − Stony coral communities in patch reefs remained relatively constant after the 1998 El Niño (Ruzicka et al. 2013). − Patch reefs exposed to moderate SST Carysfort Reef - Images from Gene Shinn - USGS Photo Gallery variability exhibited the highest % live coral cover (Soto et al. 2011). Objective To test if the differences in stony coral diversity on Florida Keys reefs were correlated with habitats or SST variability from 1996 - 2010. Methods: Coral Reef Evaluation & Monitoring Program (CREMP) % coral cover 43 species DRY TORTUGAS UPPER KEYS MIDDLE KEYS LOWER KEYS 36 CREMP STATIONS (Patch Reefs (11), Offshore Shallow (12), Offshore Deep (13)) Methods: Sea Surface Temperature (SST) • Annual SST variance were derived from weekly means. • Categories for SST variability (variance): • Low (<7.0°C2) • Intermediate (7.0 - 10.9°C2) • High (≥11.0°C2) Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) SST data Vega-Rodriguez M et al. (2015) Results 1 I 0.5 Acropora palmata I s i Millepora complanata x Multivariate Statistics A l a Acropora c i Agaricia agaricites n o Pseudodiploriarevealed clivosa cervicornisthat stonycomplex n a C 0 Porites astreoides Madracis auretenra h t i coral diversity varied w Diploria labyrinthiformis Agaricia lamarcki n o Siderastrea radians i t Porites porites a l e significantly with r r Orbicella annularis o C -0.5 Pseudodiploriahabitats strigosa Colpophyllia natansStephanocoenia intercepta Montastraea cavernosa Siderastrea siderea Canonical Analysis of Principal Coordinates (CAP) -1 0.6 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 Correlation with Canonical Axis I ) % 0.4 7 6 .
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of the 2005 Coral Bleaching Event on Porites Porites and Colpophyllia Natans at Tektite Reef, US Virgin Islands
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Springer - Publisher Connector Coral Reefs (2007) 26:689–693 DOI 10.1007/s00338-007-0241-y NOTE Impact of the 2005 coral bleaching event on Porites porites and Colpophyllia natans at Tektite Reef, US Virgin Islands K. R. T. Whelan · J. Miller · O. Sanchez · M. Patterson Received: 7 August 2006 / Accepted: 19 April 2007 / Published online: 6 June 2007 © Springer-Verlag 2007 Abstract A thermal stress anomaly in 2005 caused mass Introduction coral bleaching at a number of north-east Caribbean reefs. The impact of the thermal stress event and subsequent Coral bleaching occurs when coral polyps loose pigment or White-plague disease type II on Porites porites and Colpo- expel zooxanthellae due to physiological stress, which phyllia natans was monitored using a time series of photo- recently has been most-often related to high water tempera- graphs from Tektite Reef, Virgin Islands National Park, tures and high solar radiation (Brown 1997; Winter et al. St. John. Over 92% of the P. porites and 96% of the 1998; Santavy et al. 2005). Since the 1980s, reports of coral C. natans experienced extensive bleaching (>30% of col- bleaching in the Caribbean have increased, with major ony bleached). During the study, 56% of P. porites and Caribbean-wide bleaching occurring in 1997–1998 (Hoegh- 42% of C. natans experienced whole-colony mortality Guldberg 1999; Aronson et al. 2000; Gardner et al. 2003). within the sample plots. While all whole-colony mortality Approximately 43–47% of coral tissue bleached at two St of P.
    [Show full text]
  • Pseudosiderastrea Formosa Sp. Nov. (Cnidaria: Anthozoa: Scleractinia)
    Zoological Studies 51(1): 93-98 (2012) Pseudosiderastrea formosa sp. nov. (Cnidaria: Anthozoa: Scleractinia) a New Coral Species Endemic to Taiwan Michel Pichon1, Yao-Yang Chuang2,3, and Chaolun Allen Chen2,3,4,* 1Museum of Tropical Queensland, 70-102 Flinders Street, Townsville 4810, Australia 2Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Nangang, Taipei 115, Taiwan 3Institute of Oceanography, National Taiwan Univ., Taipei 106, Taiwan 4Institute of Life Science, National Taitung Univ., Taitung 904, Taiwan (Accepted September 1, 2011) Michel Pichon, Yao-Yang Chuang, and Chaolun Allen Chen (2012) Pseudosiderastrea formosa sp. nov. (Cnidaria: Anthozoa: Scleractinia) a new coral species endemic to Taiwan. Zoological Studies 51(1): 93-98. Pseudosiderastrea formosa sp. nov. is a new siderastreid scleractinian coral collected in several localities in Taiwan. It lives on rocky substrates where it forms encrusting colonies. Results of morphological observations and molecular genetic analyses are presented. The new species is described and compared to P. tayamai and Siderastrea savignyana, and its morphological and phylogenic affinities are discussed. http://zoolstud.sinica.edu.tw/Journals/51.1/93.pdf Key words: Pseudosiderastrea formosa sp. nov., New species, Scleractinia, Siderastreid, Western Pacific Ocean. A siderastreid scleractinian coral was Pseudosiderastrea, described as P. formosa sp. collected from several localities around Taiwan nov. and nearby islands, where it is relatively rare. The specimens present some morphological similarities with Pseudosiderastrea tayamai Yabe MATERIAL AND METHODS and Sugiyama, 1935, the only species hitherto known from that genus, and with Siderastrea Specimens were collected by scuba diving at savignyana Milne Edwards and Haime, 1849, Wanlitung (21°59'48"N, 120°42'10"E) and the outlet which is the sole representative in the Indian of the 3rd nuclear power plant (21°55'51.38"N, Ocean of the genus Siderastrea de Blainville, 120°44'46.82"E) on the southeastern coast 1830.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy and Phylogenetic Relationships of the Coral Genera Australomussa and Parascolymia (Scleractinia, Lobophylliidae)
    Contributions to Zoology, 83 (3) 195-215 (2014) Taxonomy and phylogenetic relationships of the coral genera Australomussa and Parascolymia (Scleractinia, Lobophylliidae) Roberto Arrigoni1, 7, Zoe T. Richards2, Chaolun Allen Chen3, 4, Andrew H. Baird5, Francesca Benzoni1, 6 1 Dept. of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126, Milan, Italy 2 Aquatic Zoology, Western Australian Museum, 49 Kew Street, Welshpool, WA 6106, Australia 3Biodiversity Research Centre, Academia Sinica, Nangang, Taipei 115, Taiwan 4 Institute of Oceanography, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106, Taiwan 5 ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia 6 Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, UMR227 Coreus2, 101 Promenade Roger Laroque, BP A5, 98848 Noumea Cedex, New Caledonia 7 E-mail: [email protected] Key words: COI, evolution, histone H3, Lobophyllia, Pacific Ocean, rDNA, Symphyllia, systematics, taxonomic revision Abstract Molecular phylogeny of P. rowleyensis and P. vitiensis . 209 Utility of the examined molecular markers ....................... 209 Novel micromorphological characters in combination with mo- Acknowledgements ...................................................................... 210 lecular studies have led to an extensive revision of the taxonomy References ...................................................................................... 210 and systematics of scleractinian corals. In the present work, we Appendix .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Survey of the United States Virgin Islands
    United States In cooperation with Department of the Virgin Islands Agriculture Department of Planning Soil Survey of and Natural Resources; the Natural Virgin Islands Cooperative the United States Resources Extension Service; and the Conservation United States Department Service of Interior, National Park Virgin Islands Service 3 How to Use This Soil Survey General Soil Map The general soil map, which is the color map preceding the detailed soil maps, shows the survey area divided into groups of associated soils called general soil map units. This map is useful in planning the use and management of large areas. To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the map, identify the name of the map unit in the area on the color-coded map legend, then refer to the section General Soil Map Units for a general description of the soils in your area. Detailed Soil Maps The detailed soil maps follow the general soil map. These maps can be useful in planning the use and management of small areas. To find information about your area of interest, locate that area on the Index to Map Sheets, which precedes the soil maps. Note the number of the map sheet and turn to that sheet. Locate your area of interest on the map sheet. Note the map units symbols that are in that area. Turn to the Contents, which lists the map units by symbol and name and shows the page where each map unit is described. The Contents shows which table has data on a specific land use for each detailed soil map unit.
    [Show full text]
  • Coral Injuries Caused by Spirobranchus Opercula with and Without Epibiotic Turf Algae at Curaçao
    Marine Biology (2019) 166:60 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-019-3504-6 SHORT NOTE Coral injuries caused by Spirobranchus opercula with and without epibiotic turf algae at Curaçao Bert W. Hoeksema1,2 · Dagmar Wels1 · Roeland J. van der Schoot1 · Harry A. ten Hove1 Received: 11 January 2019 / Accepted: 26 March 2019 © The Author(s) 2019 Abstract Reef-dwelling Christmas tree worms (Spirobranchus spp.) are common coral associates. Their calcareous tubes are usually embedded in the coral skeleton and can be closed by an operculum. Tubes not overgrown by coral tissue either remain bare or become covered by algae. Despite their widespread distribution, high abundance and striking appearance, little is known about the impact of these worms on their hosts. We quantifed visible coral damage caused by Spirobranchus in Curaçao (Southern Caribbean) and found that 62.6% of worm opercula (n = 1323) caused abrasions and tissue loss in their hosts. Filamentous turf algae, known to be potentially harmful to corals, covered 76.9% of the opercula. Examination of the six most frequently inhabited host species showed a variation in the damage percentages, although this was independent of the presence of epibiotic algae on 78.4% of all opercula. Since injured corals are more susceptible to diseases, the overall nega- tive impact of Spirobranchus worms on their hosts may be more severe than previously assumed. Introduction and Nishihira 1996), even if the host becomes overgrown by sponges and octocorals, which in turn can act as replacement Coral-dwelling tubeworms of the genus Spirobranchus hosts (Hoeksema et al. 2015, 2016; García-Hernández and (Polychaeta: Serpulidae), known popularly as Christmas Hoeksema 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Central American Cichlids Thea Quick Beautiful Guide to the Major Klunzinger’S Groups! Wrasse
    Redfish Issue #6, December 2011 Central American cichlids theA quick beautiful guide to the major Klunzinger’s groups! Wrasse Tropical Marine Reef Grow the Red Tiger Lotus! Family Serranidae explored. Vanuatu’s amazing reef! 100 80 60 40 Light insensityLight (%) 20 0 0:00 4:00 8:00 12:00 16:00 20:00 0:00 Time PAR Readings Surface 855 20cm 405 40cm 185 60cm 110 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Model Number Dimensions Power Radiance 60 68x22x5.5cm 90W Radiance 90 100x22x5.5cm 130W Radiance 120 130x22x5.5cm 180W 11000K (white only) Total Output 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 Distribution Relative Spectral Relative 0.0 0.0 400 500 600 700 400 500 600 700 Wavelength Marine Coral Reef Aqua One Radiance.indd 1 9/12/11 12:36 PM Redfish contents redfishmagazine.com.au 4 About 5 News Redfish is: 7 Off the shelf Jessica Drake, Nicole Sawyer, Julian Corlet & David Midgley 13 Where land and water meet: Ripariums Email: [email protected] Web: redfishmagazine.com.au 15 Competitions Facebook: facebook.com/redfishmagazine Twitter: @redfishmagazine 16 Red Lotus Redfish Publishing. Pty Ltd. PO Box 109 Berowra Heights, 17 Today in the Fishroom NSW, Australia, 2082. ACN: 151 463 759 23 Klunzinger’s Wrasse This month’s Eye Candy Contents Page Photos courtesy: (Top row. Left to Right) 28 Not just Groupers: Serranidae ‘Gurnard on the Wing - Coió’ by Lazlo Ilyes ‘shachihoko’ by Emre Ayaroglu ‘Starfish, Waterlemon Cay, St. John, USVI’ by Brad Spry 33 Snorkel Vanuatu ‘Water Ballet’ by Martina Rathgens ‘Strange Creatures’ by Steve Jurvetson 42 Illumination: Guide to lighting (Part II) (Bottom row.
    [Show full text]
  • Molinière-Beauséjour Marine Protected Area Management Plan Table of Ccontentsontents
    MolinièreMolinière----BeauséjourBeauséjour Marine Protected Area Grenada Management Plan Grenada Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry & FisheriesFisheries September 2010 Acknowledgments All persons who have contributed to the development of this plan, namely the MPA Stakeholders Committee, the personnel of the Fisheries division, and all the people who kindly shared relevant pieces of information that were put together to build this document are hereby acknowledged. Special thanks are due to local communities and fishermen who willingly gave their time to participate in the surveys. This management plan was developed with technical assistance provided by the United States Agency for International Development through the Caribbean Open Trade Support project (COTS). The consultant Dr Dominique Roby, main author of this document, was assisted in the field by Tyrone Buckmire. Jerry Mitchell produced the maps on Figures 1, 4 and 8. The National Fish and Wildlife Foundation provided a financial support to the MPA Realization in Grenada Project which outputs were integrated in the development of the management plan. ii Molinière-Beauséjour Marine Protected Area Management Plan Table of ccontentsontents AcknowledgmentsAcknowledgments................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................................................................................................ ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MRAG South Atlantic PSA Draft Report
    South Atlantic Species Productivity – Susceptibility Analyses Draft Report To the Lenfest Ocean Program MRAG Americas 65 Eastern Avenue, Unit B2C Essex, MA 01929 Ph. 978-768-3880 Fax. 978-768-3878 www.mragamericas.com August 27, 2008 Table of Contents 1 Introduction........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 The Risk Based Assessment ........................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Information Collection ...................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 A Note about our Productivity Susceptibility Analysis Methodology................................................ 3 2 Non Snapper/Grouper Species ............................................................................................................ 3 2.1 Pink Shrimp, Penaeus [Farfantepenaeus] duorarum ....................................................................... 3 2.2 Red Drum, Sciaenops ocellatus ....................................................................................................... 4 3 Snapper/Grouper Complex .................................................................................................................. 5 3.1 Groupers .......................................................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Snapper.........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]