DOCSLIB.ORG

The Pedagogical Model

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Pedagogical Model THE PEDAGOGICAL MODEL Curriculum planning Building practice and assessment excellence Excellence in Evidence-based high teaching Evaluating impact impact teaching on learning strategies and learning r ito E Student on va achievement, lu engagement m a and wellbeing Parents and carers d t Empowering students Positive Community as partners n e and building school pride climate for engagement a a learning in learning Global citizenship t n Health and wellbeing n d Networks with schools, e services and agencies Setting expectations d Professional E and promoting inclusion leadership m e x i e g p a Building l l Intellectual communities a o g engagement and p g r self awareness n e n m E o I Building leadership Vision values s teams and culture e Instructional Strategic and shared resource leadership management Student achievement, E engagement v n a and wellbeing i l a u l a p t x e E D e v s e l l a o o p g a Elab rate t n o e d s p d l n an a se iti or Pri Acknowledgments The Department of Education and Training (the Department) acknowledges the expertise and commitment of teachers and school leaders in Victorian government schools who First published by the Department of Education and Training, work to build teaching and learning excellence every day. Melbourne, June 2018., updated October 2020. We would like to thank school principals, teachers and departmental colleagues for their valuable contribution to © State of Victoria (Department of Education and Training) developing this resource. 2020 The Pedagogical Model is designed to support delivery of The copyright in this document is owned by the State of the Victorian Curriculum F-10 and the Victorian Early Years Victoria (Department of Education and Training), or in the case Learning and Development Framework. It draws from the of some materials, by third parties (third party materials). No current evidence base, including the following frameworks part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance and initiatives: with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968, the National • Framework for Improving Student Outcomes Education Access Licence for Schools (NEALS) (see below) or • Australian Professional Standards for Teachers with permission. • Literacy and Numeracy Strategy An educational institution situated in Australia which is not • Practice Principles for Excellence in Teaching and Learning conducted for profit, or a body responsible for administering such an institution may copy and communicate the materials, • High Impact Teaching Strategies (HITS) other than third party materials, for the educational purposes • Professional Learning Communities of the institution. • School Differentiation Model (School Strategic Plan, Annual Authorised by the Department of Education and Training, Implementation Plan, Performance and Development 2 Treasury Place, East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002. Approach) • New Pedagogies for Deep Learning Community of Practice. ISBN 978-0-7594-0835-7 Contents Introduction 4 Why the Pedagogical Model? 5 What is the Pedagogical Model? 6 How does the Pedagogical Model fit into the 7 Victorian Teaching and Learning Model? How is the FISO Improvement Cycle 8 embedded in the Pedagogical Model? Who is the Pedagogical Model for? 9 How does the Pedagogical Model 10 align with other DET resources and initiatives? The Pedagogical Model domains explained 11 Domains overview 12 Engage 14 Explore 16 Explain 18 Elaborate 20 Evaluate 22 Glossary 24 Evidence base 26 Providing feedback This resource is the result of generous collaboration among Victorian government school teachers and departmental colleagues. We intend to update the resource over time, and your contribution will help us make it more useful for teachers. Please send your comments and ideas to: [email protected] Introduction Teachers have a critical role in shaping Victorian teachers and school leaders are Each of the resources in the Victorian the lives of their students. Victorian teachers responding to the extraordinary learning Teaching and Learning Model builds on the work everyday to prepare our young people challenges and opportunities facing children improvement priorities of the FISO and for a future which is characterised by and young people. In response to these aligns with the Literacy and Numeracy dynamic change. demands, the teaching profession itself is Strategy Phase 2: Achieving Excellence The Victorian Government is committed to changing. Teachers are spending more time and Equity in Literacy and Numeracy. providing every student with opportunities working together. They devote collaborative Together they reinforce our shared vision to achieve excellence in reading, maths, time to evaluating and improving their and language for school improvement. The Pedagogical Model embeds that vision and science, critical and creative thinking, and practice and they draw on pedagogical language in the classroom, where teachers the arts. Our ambitious Education State resources to create deeper learning create opportunities for students to reach targets focus our efforts on promoting experiences for students. their full potential, regardless of their excellence across the curriculum, on the To support and complement the efforts of background or circumstance. health and wellbeing of students, and on our teachers and school leaders, we have breaking the link between disadvantage developed the Victorian Teaching and Teachers and school leaders have told and student outcomes. Learning Model which has four interrelated us they want resources that expand their conversations about effective teaching and Our schools deliver this excellence through elements. It gives us a Vision for Learning, the learning. The Pedagogical Model follows a focus on high quality teaching and Practice Principles for Excellence in Teaching their lead, it is adaptive and flexible, not learning. This is supported by the Victorian and Learning, the Pedagogical Model and prescriptive and linear, and it encourages Teaching and Learning Model which High Impact Teaching Strategies (HITS). teachers to move back and forth between includes the Pedagogical Model presented Together, they form an evidence-based the five domains as they respond to their here. The Pedagogical Model builds on the answer to the question every improvement- students’ learning needs. The Pedagogical previous e5 model and has been developed focused conversation in schools is about: ‘What is highly effective teaching and Model maps the five domains to the to align with the Framework for Improving learning?’ relevant Practice Principles and HITs, and Student Outcomes (FISO). These two key creates opportunities for deep learning frameworks are developed from the latest experiences. and best evidence for what works and teacher feedback. 4 Why the Pedagogical Model? Why the Pedagogical Model? In collaboration with Victorian teachers and school leaders, the Pedagogical Model has been The Pedagogical Model is… The Pedagogical Model is not… designed to reflect the current evidence base and departmental initiatives, including FISO and the Performance and Development approach. embedded in the Victorian Teaching and Learning Model that incorporates the Vision X a stand-alone resource While FISO focuses on school improvement, the new Pedagogical Model underpins teacher for Learning, Practice Principles and HITS practice improvement, recognising the vital role teachers play in improving student outcomes. focused on teacher practice as the main The Pedagogical Model, as a part of the Victorian Teaching and Learning Model (p. 7), a recipe for solving all problems in contributor to improved student learning X supports schools to build teacher excellence and instructional leadership. Combined with teaching and learning the Vision for Learning, Practice Principles for Excellence in Teaching and Learning (Practice outcomes Principles) and High Impact Teaching Strategies (HITS), the Pedagogical Model will stimulate improvement-focused to assist teachers discussions about current teaching practices in schools, help schools to build a high a tool for evaluating teacher with their professional learning, including X performance learning culture, and ultimately improve student achievement and engagement. performance designing their PD goals By providing common language and guidance on improving the quality and consistency of teaching practice, the Pedagogical Model enables school leaders, teachers and students adaptive and can be modified to fit specific to foster shared leadership so that everybody contributes to co-designed and connected X a prescriptive model learning. school and subject contexts The Pedagogical Model defines what high quality teaching looks like. It is not a prescription for practice. It is a flexible model that can be readily modified for different school settings and flexible, so teachers can move in and out of X a linear model learning areas. We encourage schools to take the lead in adapting the Pedagogical Model to different domains, depending on the context their own school contexts so that it deepens their continuing endeavour to improve learning outcomes through a concerted focus on students’ needs, interests and abilities. Schools can evolving and will be expanded through use the Pedagogical Model immediately or can benchmark their current pedagogical models showcasing best practice across Victorian X a static model for efficacy and consistency. government schools What is new about the Pedagogical Model? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 It
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2021 North Carolina Public School Salary Schedules
    Fiscal Year 2020 - 2021 North Carolina Public School Salary Schedules Available online: www.dpi.nc.gov/districts-schools/district-operations/financial-and-business-services/compensation-public-school-employees Financial & Business Services NC Department of Public Instruction 2020-2021 BACHELOR'S DEGREE CERTIFIED TEACHER SALARY SCHEDULE Effective July 1, 2020 Years Bachelor's Teacher Bachelor's w/ NBPTS Certification of Monthly 12 Monthly Annual Salary Monthly 12 Monthly Annual Salary Exp Salary Installments (10 months) Salary Installments (10 months) 0 $3,500 $2,916.67 $35,000 N/A N/A N/A 1 $3,600 $3,000.00 $36,000 N/A N/A N/A 2 $3,700 $3,083.33 $37,000 N/A N/A N/A 3 $3,800 $3,166.67 $38,000 $4,256 $3,546.67 $42,560 4 $3,900 $3,250.00 $39,000 $4,368 $3,640.00 $43,680 5 $4,000 $3,333.33 $40,000 $4,480 $3,733.33 $44,800 6 $4,100 $3,416.67 $41,000 $4,592 $3,826.67 $45,920 7 $4,200 $3,500.00 $42,000 $4,704 $3,920.00 $47,040 8 $4,300 $3,583.33 $43,000 $4,816 $4,013.33 $48,160 9 $4,400 $3,666.67 $44,000 $4,928 $4,106.67 $49,280 10 $4,500 $3,750.00 $45,000 $5,040 $4,200.00 $50,400 11 $4,600 $3,833.33 $46,000 $5,152 $4,293.33 $51,520 12 $4,700 $3,916.67 $47,000 $5,264 $4,386.67 $52,640 13 $4,800 $4,000.00 $48,000 $5,376 $4,480.00 $53,760 14 $4,900 $4,083.33 $49,000 $5,488 $4,573.33 $54,880 15 $5,000 $4,166.67 $50,000 $5,600 $4,666.67 $56,000 16 $5,000 $4,166.67 $50,000 $5,600 $4,666.67 $56,000 17 $5,000 $4,166.67 $50,000 $5,600 $4,666.67 $56,000 18 $5,000 $4,166.67 $50,000 $5,600 $4,666.67 $56,000 19 $5,000 $4,166.67 $50,000 $5,600 $4,666.67 $56,000 20 $5,000 $4,166.67 $50,000 $5,600 $4,666.67 $56,000 21 $5,000 $4,166.67 $50,000 $5,600 $4,666.67 $56,000 22 $5,000 $4,166.67 $50,000 $5,600 $4,666.67 $56,000 23 $5,000 $4,166.67 $50,000 $5,600 $4,666.67 $56,000 24 $5,000 $4,166.67 $50,000 $5,600 $4,666.67 $56,000 25+ $5,200 $4,333.33 $52,000 $5,824 $4,853.33 $58,240 NOTE: "NBPTS" stands for National Board for Professional Teacher Standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Pedagogical Quality in Preschool an Issue of Perspectives
    GÖTEBORG STUDIES IN EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES 160 Sonja Sheridan Pedagogical Quality in Preschool An issue of perspectives ACTA UNIVERSITATIS GOTHOBURGENSIS ISBN etc. To my dearest loved ones: my husband Joseph, my daughter Tina and my son Tony Abstract Title: Pedagogical Quality in Preschool – An issue of perspectives Language: English Keywords: Pedagogical quality, external evaluations of pedagogical quality, self- evaluations of pedagogical quality, a model of competence development, children’s rights ISBN: 91-7346-403-1 The main aims of this thesis on the pedagogical quality in preschool are: to define and describe a pedagogical concept of quality; to explore how quality is experienced and valued from different perspectives; to find out what characterises a pedagogical environment of high quality; and to discuss how those characteristics can be used to improve the quality of pre- school. The thesis comprises four studies, a meta-perspective of the results of these and a theoretical framework. Two studies were part of a project, which aimed to improve the peda- gogical quality in 20 preschools. The use of both external and self-evaluations of quality with ECERS gave an opportunity to compare these evaluations with one another as well as using the results to plan the content of a targeted development programme. In the third study, three preschools evaluated to be of low quality and three of good quality were selected for in-depth studies. Thirty-nine five-year-old children were interviewed about their conceptions of decision-making and how they experienced their possibilities for exercising influence in their own preschool. In a comparative study between Germany and Sweden, researchers made parallel and independent evaluations of the quality with ECERS in 20 preschools, 10 in each country.
    [Show full text]
  • The Philosophical Underpinnings of Educational Research
    The Philosophical Underpinnings of Educational Research Lindsay Mack Abstract This article traces the underlying theoretical framework of educational research. It outlines the definitions of epistemology, ontology and paradigm and the origins, main tenets, and key thinkers of the 3 paradigms; positivist, interpetivist and critical. By closely analyzing each paradigm, the literature review focuses on the ontological and epistemological assumptions of each paradigm. Finally the author analyzes not only the paradigm’s weakness but also the author’s own construct of reality and knowledge which align with the critical paradigm. Key terms: Paradigm, Ontology, Epistemology, Positivism, Interpretivism The English Language Teaching (ELT) field has moved from an ad hoc field with amateurish research to a much more serious enterprise of professionalism. More teachers are conducting research to not only inform their teaching in the classroom but also to bridge the gap between the external researcher dictating policy and the teacher negotiating that policy with the practical demands of their classroom. I was a layperson, not an educational researcher. Determined to emancipate myself from my layperson identity, I began to analyze the different philosophical underpinnings of each paradigm, reading about the great thinkers’ theories and the evolution of social science research. Through this process I began to examine how I view the world, thus realizing my own construction of knowledge and social reality, which is actually quite loose and chaotic. Most importantly, I realized that I identify most with the critical paradigm assumptions and that my future desired role as an educational researcher is to affect change and challenge dominant social and political discourses in ELT.
    [Show full text]
  • Education: the Three Disciplines of Educational Neuroscience
    MARIAN UNIVERSITY Indianapolis ® School of Education and Exercise Science The Three Disciplines of Educational Neuroscience Educational neuroscience is the discipline that combines neuroscience, pedagogy, and psychology bringing the current research from how the brain learns, behaves, and relates to instructional practices in the classroom. Every class, assignment, and experience shapes the human brain. Understanding how the brain processes information into learning and knowing more about what it takes for students’ brains to be engaged, responsive, and alert are fundamental to the teaching and learning process. Pedagogy is the study of the art and science of the teaching and learning process. Educators need to Neuroscience is the study of the understand how the environment, brain’s development, structure, and NEUROSCIENCE PEDAGOGY poverty, boredom, support systems, function. The goal of educators is to Brain and Individual education substance abuse, and all emotional, have successful students and one of its functioning and learning social, and cognitive facets affect the ways to promote success in our the brain and how it learns, students is to understand how the NEUROEDUCATION relates, and behaves. Educational learning process occurs. The process Mind, brain, and neuroscience is the active of learning involves changing the education science engagement of purposeful strategies brain. The selection of instructional based on the principles derived techniques and the designing from neuroscience and of lesson plans can be aided educational psychology. by understanding how the brain responds and through applying principles from the neuroscience PSYCHOLOGY Educational psychology is the research in the classrooms. Mind and behavior study of developmental mental processes responsible for cognition and behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • CE 001 572 the Recognition of Continuing Education: Working
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 090 421 CE 001 572 TITLE National Task Force on a Uniform Measurement Unit for the Recognition of Continuing Education: Working Papers; and The Continuing Education Unit: A Uniform Unit of Measure for Non-Credit Continuing Education Programs (An Interim Statement of the National Task Forces) . INSTITUTION National Univ. Extension Association, Washington, D.C. PUB DATE Jul 70 NOTE 33p.; There is no page 7 in the Working Papers EDRS PRICE MF-$0.75 HC-$1.85 PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTORS Administrator Guides; *Adult Education; *Adult Education Programs; Adult Educators; Guidelines; *Noncredit Courses; Pilot Projects; Post Secondary Education; Program Development; Program Planning; Recordkeeping IDENTIFIERS CEU; *Continuing Education Unit ABSTRACT In 1968, a national planning conference, under the joint sponsorship of 34 organizations responsing to continuing education needs, created the National Task Force to determine the feasibility of a uniform unit of measurement and develop a proposal for field testing the concept. Stressing that continuing education units should supplement, not supplant the credit hour, a working paper was issued suggesting a program of action that included general standards and criteria, questions to be answered, potential subcommittee tasks, and design of forms. In 1973, after two years of deliberation, the National Task Force issued an interim statement defining the Continuing Education Unit (CEU) as: "ten contact hours of participation in an organized continuing education experience under responsible sponsorship, capable direction, and qualified instruction." This document, forming a basic framework for future development and utilization of the also sets forth purposes and objectives, administrative requirements, suggested applications, and practical guidelines. It concludes with the announcement of a pilot project to test the report recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Program for Continuing Education Policy Guidelines and Procedures
    Program for Continuing Education Policy Guidelines and Procedures I. Purpose The P.E.O. Program for Continuing Education is a D. Grants may be awarded for one term of need based grant program providing one-time academic or technical courses, including online financial assistance to women whose education programs offered by educational institution in has been interrupted and who find it necessary to the United States or Canada. return to school to complete a degree or E. The applications of individuals who satisfy certification that improves their marketable skills for these eligibility criteria will be evaluated on a employment to support them. nondiscriminatory basis without consideration of race, national origin, religious affiliation, II. Eligibility disability, or P.E.O. connection. A. A woman is eligible for recommendation by a III. Amount of Grant local chapter if she: • is a citizen or legal permanent resident of the The maximum grant is $3,000. A request for less United States or Canada; than a maximum grant is encouraged when the • is enrolled in a certification or degree full amount is not essential. The total grant program from an accredited institution; awarded is based on the availability of funds and • is living and studying in the United States or applicants’ individual needs. Regardless of the Canada for the entire course of study; amount awarded, recipients are only eligible to • has had at least 24 consecutive months as a receive one PCE grant. nonstudent sometime in her adult life; Grants to Canadian women will be paid in • is within 18 consecutive months of Canadian dollars unless attending an educational completing her educational program which, at program in the U.S.; then payment may be in the conclusion of, will lead to employment or U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Educational Psychology a Contemporary Approach
    BORICP01.doc - 1 Second Edition Educational Psychology A Contemporary Approach Gary D. Borich The University of Texas at Austin Martin L. Tombari University of Denver (This publication may be reproduced for student and classroom use without prior written permission of the authors) BORICP01.doc - 2 BORICP01.doc - 3 Contents in Brief Preface Chapter 1: Introduction to Educational Psychology Part I: What Teachers Need to Know About Development Chapter 2: Cognitive Development Chapter 3: Personal-Social Development: The Feeling Child Part II: What Teachers Need to Know About Learning Chapter 4: The Behavioral Science Approach to Learning Chapter 5: Cognitive Learning I: Understanding Effective Thinking Chapter 6: Making Learners Active Thinkers Chapter 7: Motivation and Classroom Learning Part III: What Teachers Need to Know About Instruction and Classroom Management Chapter 8: Group Process in the Classroom Chapter 9: Positive Approaches to Conduct Management Chapter 10: Instructional Management Part IV: What Teachers Need to Know About Assessment Chapter 11: Assessing for Learning: Ability and Standardized Assessment Chapter 12: Assessing for Learning: Objective and Essay Tests Chapter 13: Assessing for Learning: Performance Assessment BORICP01.doc - 4 Part V: What Teachers Need to Know About Learner Diversity Chapter 14: Teaching Exceptional and At-Risk Learners Chapter 15: Multicultural and Gender-Fair Instruction Chapter 16: Family Systems and Home-School Partnerships Appendix: Discussion and Practice Answers Glossary References BORICP01.doc
    [Show full text]
  • Why Pedagogy Matters: the Importance of Teaching in a Standards-Based Environment Susan Entz, Instructor, Hawaii Community College
    Forum on Public Policy Why Pedagogy Matters: The Importance of Teaching In A Standards-Based Environment Susan Entz, Instructor, Hawaii Community College Abstract The goal of the standards movement has been to improve student outcomes for all children regardless of their backgrounds or risk factors. The focus has primarily been on the instructional, program or performance standards. Paramount importance has been placed on what children will do to demonstrate that they have learned. While important, there is another ingredient in achieving positive student outcomes. What teachers do and how they do it is critically important and has a profound impact on the quality of the educational experience for children. This paper presents the seminal work of the Center For Research On Education, Diversity and Excellence (CREDE), one of the twelve federally funded research centers on education. Its findings, summarized in five critical elements of effective pedagogy, demonstrate that when consistently implemented the result is greater student outcomes across the curriculum regardless of age, and higher academic test scores regardless of the student population. Application in early childhood education settings is also discussed. Pedagogy: The Science Of Teaching Word Origin--Greek: Paidagogas paidos—a boy a gogos-leader agein-to lead In Ancient Greece a paidagogos was a trusted slave who accompanied a child to his classes, ensured his good behavior in public, cared for his needs and tutored him with his homework. Introduction Teaching and learning are complex processes. Throughout history, society has looked for better ways to educate children. Americans are still struggling with that fundamental issue, particularly in light of our diverse population and the rapid rate of technological change.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Data Terms
    Glossary of Terms The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board has produced this Glossary of commonly used Texas higher education terms. By its nature, the Glossary will be an evolving document. If you have suggestions for clear wording for terms in the Glossary or for terms whose definition you would like to have included, please send your suggestions to Torca Bunton at [email protected] at the Coordinating Board. TEXAS HIGHER EDUCATION COORDINATING BOARD Educational Data Center Glossary of Terms August 14, 2017 AAT Associate of Arts in a Teaching degree. Board-approved collegiate degree programs consisting of lower-division courses intended for transfer to baccalaureate programs that lead to initial Texas teacher certification. (CTC CBM009) Academic Course Guide Manual (ACGM) The official list of approval numbers for general academic transfer courses that may be offered for state funding by public community and technical colleges in Texas. It lists a basic core of general academic courses which are freely transferable among all public institutions of higher education in Texas in accordance with the Texas Education Code, §61.051(g). TCCNS numbers are assigned to most courses in the manual. Academic courses reported on the CTC CBM004 must appear either on this list of approved courses or in the Special Approval/Unique Need Inventory. See Lower Division Academic Course Guide Manual. (CTC CBM004) Academic Credit Course A college-level course that, if successfully completed, can be applied toward the number of courses required for achieving a degree, diploma, certificate, or other formal award. Academic Program Instructional program leading toward an associate’s, bachelor’s, master’s, doctor’s, or first-professional degree or resulting in credits that can be applied to one of these degrees.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy of Science and Educational Research: Strategies for Scientific Effectiveness and Improvement of the Education
    Philosophy of Science and Educational Research: Strategies for Scientific Effectiveness and Improvement of the Education Omar a. Poncea, José Gómez Galánb and Nellie Pagán-Maldonadoc a Professor (Metropolitan University, AGMUS, Puerto Rico-United States). [email protected] b Research Professor and Director of CICIDE (Metropolitan University, AGMUS, Puerto Rico-United States & Catholic University of Avila, Spain). [email protected] & [email protected] c Professor (Metropolitan University, AGMUS, Puerto Rico-United States). [email protected] Abstract This article is a theoretical study on the effectiveness of educational research in the context of philosophy of science. This topic of discussion, in the area of educational research, has been the subject of intellectual debate and arises again at the beginning of the 21st century. This article outlines the challenges and opportunities for scientific effectiveness facing educational research if it aspires to contribute to the ideal of an education of excellence and quality. Nine strategies to improve scientific effectiveness in educational research are identified and discussed. As a conclusion, it is argued that the foundations of contemporary educational research need to be revisited and reformulated, parallel to the new concepts present in the philosophy of science, to face the new problems present in our society*. Keywords: Educational Research; Philosophy of Science; Scientific Knowledge; Scientific Effectiveness; Education. 1. Introduction Philosophical thinking centered on science has been an object of intense debate for centuries. Thus, when we speak today of philosophy of science, we refer fundamentally to any reflection produced around the scientific methodology and its results. It faces, from the point of view of reason, the nature of science and the philosophical problems generated around it, with a direct implication in its results and applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Governing Post-Secondary Education and Skills in Canada Alison Howard, Jessica Edge
    Centre for Skills and Post-Secondary Education POLICIES, LAWS, AND REGULATIONS Governing Post- Secondary Education and Skills in Canada. REPORT NOVEMBER 2014 For the exclusive use of Joseph Mior, [email protected], Fleming College. Policies, Laws, and Regulations: Governing Post-Secondary Education and Skills in Canada Alison Howard, Jessica Edge Preface This report analyzes the policies, laws, and regulations governing post- secondary education (PSE) and skills in Canada. It is one of three foundational studies by The Conference Board of Canada’s Centre for Skills and Post- Secondary Education. The report strives to understand and make sense of past efforts, including successes and failures, and to identify priority areas for action on policies, laws, and regulations reform that will lead to future, ongoing success in the skills and PSE environment. To cite this report: Howard, Alison and Jessica Edge. Policies, Laws, and Regulations: Governing Post-Secondary Education and Skills in Canada. Ottawa: The Conference Board of Canada, 2014. © 2014 The Conference Board of Canada* Published in Canada | All rights reserved | Agreement No. 40063028 | *Incorporated as AERIC Inc. ® The Conference Board of Canada and the torch logo are registered trademarks of The Conference Board, Inc. Forecasts and research often involve numerous assumptions and data sources, and are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties. This information is not intended as specific investment, accounting, legal, or tax advice. © The Conference Board of Canada. All rights reserved. Please contact cboc.ca/ip with questions or concerns about the use of this material. Acknowledgements This report has been prepared by The Conference Board of Canada, under the direction of Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • (Ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in Early Childhood Education: Review of Research Methodologies (Vol
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273380166 . In O. N. Saracho (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in early childhood education: Review of research methodologies (Vol. 1, pp. 717-751). Charlotte, NC: Information Age. CHAPTER · MARCH 2015 READS 232 2 AUTHORS: Douglas H. Clements Julie Sarama University of Denver University of Denver 329 PUBLICATIONS 4,219 CITATIONS 166 PUBLICATIONS 1,737 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Available from: Douglas H. Clements Retrieved on: 26 January 2016 CHAPTER 21 METHODS FOR DEVELOPING SCIENTIFIC EDUCATION Research-Based Development of Practices, Pedagogies, Programs, and Polides1 Douglas H. Clements and Julie Sarama Many types of studies contribute to the field of education. But too few, in our opinion, go to the heart of the educational enterprise-developing sci­ entifically based practices, pedagogies, programs, and policies. Whether de­ veloped for children or their teachers, these are the main malleable factors that affect the quality of children's educational experiences. In this chap­ ter, we describe why be believe that this type of research-and-development program should take precedence in early childhood education and then describe a framework for such a program. I fandbook of Research Methods in Early Childhood Education, pages 717-751 Copyright© 2015 by Infonnalion Age Publishing All rights or reproduction in any form reserved. 717 718 • D. H. CLEMENTS and J. SARAMA WHY DO WE NEED RESEARCH-BASED DEVElOPMENT OF PRACTICES, PEDAGOGIES, PROGRAMS, AND POliCIES? VVhat directly affects the quality and effectiveness of young children's ex­ periences in the classroom? Teachers do, including their practices and pedagogical strategies (Darling-Hammond, 1997; Ferguson, 1991; National Research Council, 2001; Schoen, Cebulla, Finn, & Fi, 2003).
    [Show full text]