DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1609.08928V2 [Hep-Ph] 3 Mar 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A review of the open charm and open bottom systems Hua-Xing Chen1, Wei Chen2, Xiang Liu3;4, Yan-Rui Liu5 and Shi-Lin Zhu6;7;8 1School of Physics and Beijing Key Laboratory of Advanced Nuclear Materials and Physics, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China 2Department of Physics and Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 5E2, Canada 3School of Physical Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China 4Research Center for Hadron and CSR Physics, Lanzhou University and Institute of Modern Physics of CAS, Lanzhou 730000, China 5School of Physics and Key Laboratory of Particle Physics and Particle Irradiation (MOE), Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China 6School of Physics and State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China 7Collaborative Innovation Center of Quantum Matter, Beijing 100871, China 8Center of High Energy Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] and [email protected] September 2016 Abstract. Since the discovery of the first charmed meson in 1976, many open-charm and open-bottom hadrons were observed. In 2003 two narrow charm-strange states Ds∗0(2317) and Ds1(2460) were discovered by the BaBar and CLEO Collaborations, respectively. After that, more excited heavy hadrons were reported. In this work, we review the experimental and theoretical progress in this field. arXiv:1609.08928v2 [hep-ph] 3 Mar 2017 PACS numbers: 14.40.Lb, 14.40.Nd, 14.20.Lq, 14.20.Mr, 14.40.Rt Keywords: Charmed mesons, Bottom mesons, Charmed baryons, Bottom baryons, Exotic states Submitted to: Rep. Prog. Phys. Contents 1 Introduction4 CONTENTS 2 1.1 From QED to QCD . .4 1.2 Quark Model . .6 1.2.1 Quark potential models . .7 1.2.2 Coupled channel and screening effects . 10 1.2.3 Quark pair creation (QPC) models . 12 1.2.4 QCD potential . 13 1.3 Regge trajectories . 14 1.4 Heavy quark symmetry and effective Lagrangians . 16 1.5 QCD sum rules . 19 1.6 Unsettled issues . 22 2 Experimental progress on heavy hadrons 23 2.1 The charmed mesons . 24 2.1.1 D and D∗................................ 24 ∗ ∗ 2.1.2 D0(2400), D1(2420), D1(2430), and D2(2460). 25 2.1.3 D(2550) and DJ (2580). 28 ∗ ∗ ∗ 0 2.1.4 D (2600), DJ (2650), and D1(2680) ................. 28 ∗ ∗ ∗ 0 2.1.5 D(2750), DJ (2740), D (2760), DJ (2760), D1(2760) , and ∗ − D3(2760) ............................... 29 ∗ ∗ 0 2.1.6 DJ (3000), DJ (3000), and D2(3000) ................. 30 2.2 The charmed-strange mesons . 30 ∗ 2.2.1 Ds and Ds ............................... 31 ∗ 2.2.2 Ds1(2536) and Ds2(2573). 32 ∗ 2.2.3 Ds0(2317) and Ds1(2460). 32 ∗ 2.2.4 DsJ (2632). 33 ∗ 2.2.5 Ds1(2700). 34 ∗ ∗ ∗ 2.2.6 DsJ (2860), Ds1(2860), and Ds3(2860). 35 2.2.7 DsJ (3040). 36 2.3 The bottom mesons . 37 2.3.1 B and B∗................................ 38 ∗ 0 ∗ 0 2.3.2 BJ (5732), B1(5721) , and B2 (5747) ................. 38 2.3.3 B(5970), BJ (5960), and BJ (5840). 40 2.4 The bottom-strange mesons . 41 ∗ 2.4.1 Bs and Bs ............................... 42 ∗ 0 ∗ 0 2.4.2 BsJ (5850), Bs1(5830) , and Bs2(5840) ................ 42 2.5 The charmed baryons . 44 + 2.5.1 Λc .................................... 46 + + 2.5.2 Λc(2595) and Λc(2625) ....................... 46 + + + 2.5.3 Λc(2765) ,Λc(2880) , and Λc(2940) . ............... 46 2.5.4 Σc(2455) and Σc(2520). 47 2.5.5 Σc(2800). 48 0 2.5.6 Ξc,Ξc, and Ξc(2645). 49 CONTENTS 3 2.5.7 Ξc(2790) and Ξc(2815). 49 0 2.5.8 Ξc(2930) ,Ξc(2980), Ξc(3055), Ξc(3080), and Ξc(3123). 49 0 0 2.5.9 Ωc and Ωc(2770) ............................ 52 2.6 The bottom baryons . 52 0 2.6.1 Λb .................................... 54 0 0 2.6.2 Λb(5912) and Λb(5920) ........................ 54 ∗ 2.6.3 Σb and Σb ................................ 55 0 ∗ 2.6.4 Ξb,Ξb and Ξb .............................. 56 − 2.6.5 Ωb .................................... 57 2.7 The doubly-charmed baryons . 57 2.8 The X(5568) . 58 3 Candidates of the conventional excited heavy mesons 59 3.1 The charmed mesons . 60 3.1.1 D(2550) and DJ (2580). 62 ∗ ∗ 3.1.2 D (2600) and DJ (2650). 64 3.1.3 D(2750) and DJ (2740). 65 ∗ ∗ ∗ 0 ∗ − 3.1.4 D (2760), DJ (2760), D1(2760) and D3(2760) ........... 67 ∗ ∗ 3.1.5 DJ (3000), DJ (3000) and D2(3000). 67 3.2 The charmed-strange mesons . 68 ∗ 3.2.1 Ds1(2700). 69 ∗ ∗ ∗ 3.2.2 DsJ (2860), Ds1(2860) and Ds3(2860). 72 3.2.3 DsJ (3040). 74 3.3 The bottom mesons . 74 ∗ 0 ∗ 0 3.3.1 BJ (5732), B1(5721) and B2 (5747) ................. 75 3.3.2 B(5970), BJ (5960) and BJ (5840). 77 3.4 The bottom-strange mesons . 79 ∗ 0 ∗ 0 3.4.1 BsJ (5850), Bs1(5830) and Bs2(5840) ................ 79 4 Candidates for the singly heavy baryons 82 4.1 The charmed baryons . 84 4.1.1 Λc(2595), Λc(2625), Ξc(2790) and Ξc(2815). 87 4.1.2 Λc(2765), Λc(2880), Λc(2940) and Σc(2800). 89 4.1.3 Ξc(2930), Ξc(2980), Ξc(3055), Ξc(3080) and Ξc(3123). 94 4.2 The bottom baryons . 95 4.2.1 Λb(5912) and Λb(5920). 96 5 The doubly and triply charmed baryons 98 6 Candidates for the exotic heavy hadrons 102 ∗ 6.1 The Ds0(2317) and Ds1(2460) . 102 6.1.1 Molecular scheme. 102 6.1.2 Tetraquark scheme. 106 CONTENTS 4 6.1.3 Conventional charmed-strange mesons with coupled-channel effects.107 6.1.4 Lattice QCD simulation. 111 6.1.5 Short summary. 112 6.2 The X(5568) . 113 7 Outlook and summary 117 1. Introduction 1.1. From QED to QCD There are four fundamental interactions in nature: the electromagnetic interaction, the weak interaction, the strong interaction, and gravitation. The electromagnetic interaction occurs between electrically charged particles, which is responsible for electricity and magnetism as well as light. We encounter the electromagnetic interaction and gravity every day. Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) is the underlying theory of the electromagnetic interactions. Its Lagrangian reads QED µ 1 µν L = ¯ iγ Dµ m FµνF ; (1) − − 4 where the gauge covariant derivative is defined as Dµ = @µ + ieAµ : (2) Here, (x) denotes the electron/positron field, Aµ is the electromagnetic field, Fµν = @µAν @νAµ, and γµ are Dirac matrices. − The electromagnetic interaction holds the electrons and protons together inside a single atom and leads to the gross, fine, and hyperfine structures of the line spectra. The electromagnetic interactions between the atoms appear as various chemical bonds, which bind the atoms to form the molecules and drive the chemical reactions. The residual electromagnetic interaction (together with some other sources) between the neutral molecules becomes the van der Waals force, which plays a fundamental role in condensed matter physics etc. The strong interaction, another fundamental interaction that occurs between quarks and gluons, is similar to the electromagnetic interaction in some aspects. In particle physics, Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) is the underlying theory of strong interactions. Its Lagrangian is similar to the QED one: QCD µ 1 a µν L = ¯i iγ (Dµ)ij mδij j G G (3) − − 4 µν a with the covariant derivative, which has the definition a a (Dµ)ij = @µδij igA T : (4) − µ ij a Here, i(x) is the quark/antiquark field and Aµ is the gluon field, both of which a a carry the color charge. γµ are Dirac matrices and Tij = λij=2 are the generators CONTENTS 5 of the SU(3) gauge group. The tensor of the gluon field strength is defined as a a a abc b c abc G = @µA @νA + gf A A , where f denotes the antisymmetric structure µν ν − µ µ ν constant of the group. Similar to the electromagnetic interaction, the strong interaction also has several ranges. On a larger scale about 1 to 3 fm, its residual strong interaction between the nucleons becomes the nuclear force, which binds the protons and neutrons into atomic nuclei. On the smaller scale less than 1 fm, the strong QCD interaction confines the quarks and gluons to form various color-singlet hadrons. The gross, fine and hyperfine structures also exist in the hadron spectra. An ideal platform to study these structures is the heavy hadrons containing one charm or bottom quark. In recent years there have been significant experimental developments on these heavy hadrons [1,2]. We shall review all these experimental progresses in Sec.2. We try to put them together into an integrated whole to let the readers know the current experimental status. We shall also review the experimental information on the four-quark state candidate X(5568), which was recently reported by the DØ Collaboration [3], but not confirmed by the LHCb and CMS collaborations [4,5]. However, different from QED, QCD is a non-Abelian quantum field theory. Because of the difficulty in understanding the nonperturbative nature of QCD at low energy, one has to rely on the effective theoretical approaches to study hadron properties. Various methods reflecting several aspects of QCD have been proposed, such as the relativistic quark model, the constitute quark model, the chiral quark model, the quark pair creation (QPC) model, the Regge trajectory phenomenology, the chiral unitary model, the QCD sum rule, and some effective Lagrangian theories/approaches, etc.
Recommended publications
  • The Particle World

    The Particle World

    The Particle World ² What is our Universe made of? This talk: ² Where does it come from? ² particles as we understand them now ² Why does it behave the way it does? (the Standard Model) Particle physics tries to answer these ² prepare you for the exercise questions. Later: future of particle physics. JMF Southampton Masterclass 22–23 Mar 2004 1/26 Beginning of the 20th century: atoms have a nucleus and a surrounding cloud of electrons. The electrons are responsible for almost all behaviour of matter: ² emission of light ² electricity and magnetism ² electronics ² chemistry ² mechanical properties . technology. JMF Southampton Masterclass 22–23 Mar 2004 2/26 Nucleus at the centre of the atom: tiny Subsequently, particle physicists have yet contains almost all the mass of the discovered four more types of quark, two atom. Yet, it’s composite, made up of more pairs of heavier copies of the up protons and neutrons (or nucleons). and down: Open up a nucleon . it contains ² c or charm quark, charge +2=3 quarks. ² s or strange quark, charge ¡1=3 Normal matter can be understood with ² t or top quark, charge +2=3 just two types of quark. ² b or bottom quark, charge ¡1=3 ² + u or up quark, charge 2=3 Existed only in the early stages of the ² ¡ d or down quark, charge 1=3 universe and nowadays created in high energy physics experiments. JMF Southampton Masterclass 22–23 Mar 2004 3/26 But this is not all. The electron has a friend the electron-neutrino, ºe. Needed to ensure energy and momentum are conserved in ¯-decay: ¡ n ! p + e + º¯e Neutrino: no electric charge, (almost) no mass, hardly interacts at all.
  • Qcd in Heavy Quark Production and Decay

    Qcd in Heavy Quark Production and Decay

    QCD IN HEAVY QUARK PRODUCTION AND DECAY Jim Wiss* University of Illinois Urbana, IL 61801 ABSTRACT I discuss how QCD is used to understand the physics of heavy quark production and decay dynamics. My discussion of production dynam- ics primarily concentrates on charm photoproduction data which is compared to perturbative QCD calculations which incorporate frag- mentation effects. We begin our discussion of heavy quark decay by reviewing data on charm and beauty lifetimes. Present data on fully leptonic and semileptonic charm decay is then reviewed. Mea- surements of the hadronic weak current form factors are compared to the nonperturbative QCD-based predictions of Lattice Gauge The- ories. We next discuss polarization phenomena present in charmed baryon decay. Heavy Quark Effective Theory predicts that the daugh- ter baryon will recoil from the charmed parent with nearly 100% left- handed polarization, which is in excellent agreement with present data. We conclude by discussing nonleptonic charm decay which are tradi- tionally analyzed in a factorization framework applicable to two-body and quasi-two-body nonleptonic decays. This discussion emphasizes the important role of final state interactions in influencing both the observed decay width of various two-body final states as well as mod- ifying the interference between Interfering resonance channels which contribute to specific multibody decays. "Supported by DOE Contract DE-FG0201ER40677. © 1996 by Jim Wiss. -251- 1 Introduction the direction of fixed-target experiments. Perhaps they serve as a sort of swan song since the future of fixed-target charm experiments in the United States is A vast amount of important data on heavy quark production and decay exists for very short.
  • Particle Physics Dr Victoria Martin, Spring Semester 2012 Lecture 12: Hadron Decays

    Particle Physics Dr Victoria Martin, Spring Semester 2012 Lecture 12: Hadron Decays

    Particle Physics Dr Victoria Martin, Spring Semester 2012 Lecture 12: Hadron Decays !Resonances !Heavy Meson and Baryons !Decays and Quantum numbers !CKM matrix 1 Announcements •No lecture on Friday. •Remaining lectures: •Tuesday 13 March •Friday 16 March •Tuesday 20 March •Friday 23 March •Tuesday 27 March •Friday 30 March •Tuesday 3 April •Remaining Tutorials: •Monday 26 March •Monday 2 April 2 From Friday: Mesons and Baryons Summary • Quarks are confined to colourless bound states, collectively known as hadrons: " mesons: quark and anti-quark. Bosons (s=0, 1) with a symmetric colour wavefunction. " baryons: three quarks. Fermions (s=1/2, 3/2) with antisymmetric colour wavefunction. " anti-baryons: three anti-quarks. • Lightest mesons & baryons described by isospin (I, I3), strangeness (S) and hypercharge Y " isospin I=! for u and d quarks; (isospin combined as for spin) " I3=+! (isospin up) for up quarks; I3="! (isospin down) for down quarks " S=+1 for strange quarks (additive quantum number) " hypercharge Y = S + B • Hadrons display SU(3) flavour symmetry between u d and s quarks. Used to predict the allowed meson and baryon states. • As baryons are fermions, the overall wavefunction must be anti-symmetric. The wavefunction is product of colour, flavour, spin and spatial parts: ! = "c "f "S "L an odd number of these must be anti-symmetric. • consequences: no uuu, ddd or sss baryons with total spin J=# (S=#, L=0) • Residual strong force interactions between colourless hadrons propagated by mesons. 3 Resonances • Hadrons which decay due to the strong force have very short lifetime # ~ 10"24 s • Evidence for the existence of these states are resonances in the experimental data Γ2/4 σ = σ • Shape is Breit-Wigner distribution: max (E M)2 + Γ2/4 14 41.
  • Arxiv:1502.07763V2 [Hep-Ph] 1 Apr 2015

    Arxiv:1502.07763V2 [Hep-Ph] 1 Apr 2015

    Constraints on Dark Photon from Neutrino-Electron Scattering Experiments S. Bilmi¸s,1 I. Turan,1 T.M. Aliev,1 M. Deniz,2, 3 L. Singh,2, 4 and H.T. Wong2 1Department of Physics, Middle East Technical University, Ankara 06531, Turkey. 2Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan. 3Department of Physics, Dokuz Eyl¨ulUniversity, Izmir,_ Turkey. 4Department of Physics, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005, India. (Dated: April 2, 2015) Abstract A possible manifestation of an additional light gauge boson A0, named as Dark Photon, associated with a group U(1)B−L is studied in neutrino electron scattering experiments. The exclusion plot on the coupling constant gB−L and the dark photon mass MA0 is obtained. It is shown that contributions of interference term between the dark photon and the Standard Model are important. The interference effects are studied and compared with for data sets from TEXONO, GEMMA, BOREXINO, LSND as well as CHARM II experiments. Our results provide more stringent bounds to some regions of parameter space. PACS numbers: 13.15.+g,12.60.+i,14.70.Pw arXiv:1502.07763v2 [hep-ph] 1 Apr 2015 1 CONTENTS I. Introduction 2 II. Hidden Sector as a beyond the Standard Model Scenario 3 III. Neutrino-Electron Scattering 6 A. Standard Model Expressions 6 B. Very Light Vector Boson Contributions 7 IV. Experimental Constraints 9 A. Neutrino-Electron Scattering Experiments 9 B. Roles of Interference 13 C. Results 14 V. Conclusions 17 Acknowledgments 19 References 20 I. INTRODUCTION The recent discovery of the Standard Model (SM) long-sought Higgs at the Large Hadron Collider is the last missing piece of the SM which is strengthened its success even further.
  • QCD at Colliders

    QCD at Colliders

    Particle Physics Dr Victoria Martin, Spring Semester 2012 Lecture 10: QCD at Colliders !Renormalisation in QCD !Asymptotic Freedom and Confinement in QCD !Lepton and Hadron Colliders !R = (e+e!!hadrons)/(e+e!"µ+µ!) !Measuring Jets !Fragmentation 1 From Last Lecture: QCD Summary • QCD: Quantum Chromodymanics is the quantum description of the strong force. • Gluons are the propagators of the QCD and carry colour and anti-colour, described by 8 Gell-Mann matrices, !. • For M calculate the appropriate colour factor from the ! matrices. 2 2 • The coupling constant #S is large at small q (confinement) and large at high q (asymptotic freedom). • Mesons and baryons are held together by QCD. • In high energy collisions, jets are the signatures of quark and gluon production. 2 Gluon self-Interactions and Confinement , Gluon self-interactions are believed to give e+ q rise to colour confinement , Qualitative picture: •Compare QED with QCD •In QCD “gluon self-interactions squeeze lines of force into Gluona flux tube self-Interactions” ande- Confinementq , + , What happens whenGluon try self-interactions to separate two are believedcoloured to giveobjects e.g. qqe q rise to colour confinement , Qualitativeq picture: q •Compare QED with QCD •In QCD “gluon self-interactions squeeze lines of force into a flux tube” e- q •Form a flux tube, What of happensinteracting when gluons try to separate of approximately two coloured constant objects e.g. qq energy density q q •Require infinite energy to separate coloured objects to infinity •Form a flux tube of interacting gluons of approximately constant •Coloured quarks and gluons are always confined within colourless states energy density •In this way QCD provides a plausible explanation of confinement – but not yet proven (although there has been recent progress with Lattice QCD) Prof.
  • 11. the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa Mixing Matrix

    11. the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa Mixing Matrix

    11. CKM mixing matrix 103 11. THE CABIBBO-KOBAYASHI-MASKAWA MIXING MATRIX Revised 1997 by F.J. Gilman (Carnegie-Mellon University), where ci =cosθi and si =sinθi for i =1,2,3. In the limit K. Kleinknecht and B. Renk (Johannes-Gutenberg Universit¨at θ2 = θ3 = 0, this reduces to the usual Cabibbo mixing with θ1 Mainz). identified (up to a sign) with the Cabibbo angle [2]. Several different forms of the Kobayashi-Maskawa parametrization are found in the In the Standard Model with SU(2) × U(1) as the gauge group of literature. Since all these parametrizations are referred to as “the” electroweak interactions, both the quarks and leptons are assigned to Kobayashi-Maskawa form, some care about which one is being used is be left-handed doublets and right-handed singlets. The quark mass needed when the quadrant in which δ lies is under discussion. eigenstates are not the same as the weak eigenstates, and the matrix relating these bases was defined for six quarks and given an explicit A popular approximation that emphasizes the hierarchy in the size parametrization by Kobayashi and Maskawa [1] in 1973. It generalizes of the angles, s12 s23 s13 , is due to Wolfenstein [4], where one ≡ the four-quark case, where the matrix is parametrized by a single sets λ s12 , the sine of the Cabibbo angle, and then writes the other angle, the Cabibbo angle [2]. elements in terms of powers of λ: × By convention, the mixing is often expressed in terms of a 3 3 1 − λ2/2 λAλ3(ρ−iη) − unitary matrix V operating on the charge e/3 quarks (d, s,andb): V = −λ 1 − λ2/2 Aλ2 .
  • Detection of a Strange Particle

    Detection of a Strange Particle

    10 extraordinary papers Within days, Watson and Crick had built a identify the full set of codons was completed in forensics, and research into more-futuristic new model of DNA from metal parts. Wilkins by 1966, with Har Gobind Khorana contributing applications, such as DNA-based computing, immediately accepted that it was correct. It the sequences of bases in several codons from is well advanced. was agreed between the two groups that they his experiments with synthetic polynucleotides Paradoxically, Watson and Crick’s iconic would publish three papers simultaneously in (see go.nature.com/2hebk3k). structure has also made it possible to recog- Nature, with the King’s researchers comment- With Fred Sanger and colleagues’ publica- nize the shortcomings of the central dogma, ing on the fit of Watson and Crick’s structure tion16 of an efficient method for sequencing with the discovery of small RNAs that can reg- to the experimental data, and Franklin and DNA in 1977, the way was open for the com- ulate gene expression, and of environmental Gosling publishing Photograph 51 for the plete reading of the genetic information in factors that induce heritable epigenetic first time7,8. any species. The task was completed for the change. No doubt, the concept of the double The Cambridge pair acknowledged in their human genome by 2003, another milestone helix will continue to underpin discoveries in paper that they knew of “the general nature in the history of DNA. biology for decades to come. of the unpublished experimental results and Watson devoted most of the rest of his ideas” of the King’s workers, but it wasn’t until career to education and scientific administra- Georgina Ferry is a science writer based in The Double Helix, Watson’s explosive account tion as head of the Cold Spring Harbor Labo- Oxford, UK.
  • Charm Meson Molecules and the X(3872)

    Charm Meson Molecules and the X(3872)

    Charm Meson Molecules and the X(3872) DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Masaoki Kusunoki, B.S. ***** The Ohio State University 2005 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Eric Braaten, Adviser Professor Richard J. Furnstahl Adviser Professor Junko Shigemitsu Graduate Program in Professor Brian L. Winer Physics Abstract The recently discovered resonance X(3872) is interpreted as a loosely-bound S- wave charm meson molecule whose constituents are a superposition of the charm mesons D0D¯ ¤0 and D¤0D¯ 0. The unnaturally small binding energy of the molecule implies that it has some universal properties that depend only on its binding energy and its width. The existence of such a small energy scale motivates the separation of scales that leads to factorization formulas for production rates and decay rates of the X(3872). Factorization formulas are applied to predict that the line shape of the X(3872) differs significantly from that of a Breit-Wigner resonance and that there should be a peak in the invariant mass distribution for B ! D0D¯ ¤0K near the D0D¯ ¤0 threshold. An analysis of data by the Babar collaboration on B ! D(¤)D¯ (¤)K is used to predict that the decay B0 ! XK0 should be suppressed compared to B+ ! XK+. The differential decay rates of the X(3872) into J=Ã and light hadrons are also calculated up to multiplicative constants. If the X(3872) is indeed an S-wave charm meson molecule, it will provide a beautiful example of the predictive power of universality.
  • 06.08.2010 Yuming Wang the Charm-Loop Effect in B → K () L

    06.08.2010 Yuming Wang the Charm-Loop Effect in B → K () L

    The Charm-loop effect in B K( )`+` ! ∗ − Yu-Ming Wang Theoretische Physik I , Universitat¨ Siegen A. Khodjamirian, Th. Mannel,A. Pivovarov and Y.M.W. arXiv:1006.4945 Workshop on QCD and hadron physics, Weihai, August, 2010 1 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 20 22.5 25 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 I. Motivation and introduction ( ) + B K ∗ ` `− induced by b s FCNC current: • prospectiv! e channels for the search! for new physics, a multitude of non-trival observables, Available measurements from BaBar, Belle, and CDF. Current averages (from HFAG, Sep., 2009): • BR(B Kl+l ) = (0:45 0:04) 10 6 ! − × − BR(B K l+l ) = (1:08+0:12) 10 6 : ! ∗ − 0:11 × − Invariant mass distribution and FBA (Belle,−2009): ) 2 1.2 /c 1 2 1 L / GeV 0.5 0.8 F -7 (10 0.6 2 0 0.4 1 0.2 dBF/dq 0.5 ) 0 FB 2 A /c 2 0.5 0 0.4 / GeV -7 0.3 (10 1 2 0.2 I A 0 0.1 dBF/dq 0 -1 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15 17.5 20 22.5 25 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 q2(GeV2/c2) q2(GeV2/c2) Yu-Ming Wang Workshop on QCD and hadron physics, Weihai, August, 2010 2 q2(GeV2/c2) q2(GeV2/c2) Decay amplitudes in SM: • A(B K( )`+` ) = K( )`+` H B ; ! ∗ − −h ∗ − j eff j i 4G 10 H = F V V C (µ)O (µ) ; eff p tb ts∗ i i − 2 iX=1 Leading contributions from O and O can be reduced to B K( ) 9;10 7γ ! ∗ form factors.
  • Associated Higgs-Bottom Quark Production: Reconciling the 4FS and the 5FS Approach

    Associated Higgs-Bottom Quark Production: Reconciling the 4FS and the 5FS Approach

    Associated Higgs-bottom quark production: reconciling the 4FS and the 5FS approach R. Harlander, M. Kr¨amer, M. Schumacher 6. April 2011 — v0.52 1 Two approaches The cross section for associated Higgs-bottom quark production, pp → b¯bH + X, can be calculated in two different schemes. As the mass of the bottom quark is large compared to the QCD scale, mb ≫ ΛQCD, bottom quark production is a perturbative process and can be calculated order by order. Thus, in a four-flavour scheme (4FS), where one does not consider b quarks as partons in the proton, the lowest-order QCD production pro- cesses are gluon-gluon fusion and quark-antiquark annihilation, gg → b¯bH and qq¯ → b¯bH, respectively. However, the inclusive cross section for gg → b¯bH develops logarithms of the form ln(µF/mb), which arise from the splitting of gluons into nearly collinear b¯b pairs. The large scale µF ≈ MH /4 corresponds to the upper limit of the collinear region up to which factorization is valid [1, 2, 3]. For MH ≫ 4mb the logarithms become large and spoil the convergence of the perturbative series. The ln(µF/mb) terms can be summed to all orders in perturbation theory by introducing bottom parton densities. This defines the so-called five-flavour scheme (5FS). The use of bottom distribution functions is based on the approximation that the outgoing b quarks are at small transverse momentum. In this scheme, the LO process for the inclusive b¯bH cross section is bottom fusion, b¯b → H. If all orders in perturbation theory were taken into account, the four- and five-flavour schemes would be identical, but the way of ordering the perturbative expansion is different.
  • Identification of Boosted Higgs Bosons Decaying Into B-Quark

    Identification of Boosted Higgs Bosons Decaying Into B-Quark

    Eur. Phys. J. C (2019) 79:836 https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7335-x Regular Article - Experimental Physics Identification of boosted Higgs bosons decaying into b-quark pairs with the ATLAS detector at 13 TeV ATLAS Collaboration CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland Received: 27 June 2019 / Accepted: 23 September 2019 © CERN for the benefit of the ATLAS collaboration 2019 Abstract This paper describes a study of techniques for and angular distribution of the jet constituents consistent with identifying Higgs bosons at high transverse momenta decay- a two-body decay and containing two b-hadrons. The tech- ing into bottom-quark pairs, H → bb¯, for proton–proton niques described in this paper to identify Higgs bosons decay- collision data collected by the ATLAS detector√ at the Large ing into bottom-quark pairs have been used successfully in Hadron Collider at a centre-of-mass energy s = 13 TeV. several analyses [8–10] of 13 TeV proton–proton collision These decays are reconstructed from calorimeter jets found data recorded by ATLAS. with the anti-kt R = 1.0 jet algorithm. To tag Higgs bosons, In order to identify, or tag, boosted Higgs bosons it is a combination of requirements is used: b-tagging of R = 0.2 paramount to understand the details of b-hadron identifica- track-jets matched to the large-R calorimeter jet, and require- tion and the internal structure of jets, or jet substructure, in ments on the jet mass and other jet substructure variables. The such an environment [11]. The approach to tagging√ presented Higgs boson tagging efficiency and corresponding multijet in this paper is built on studies from LHC runs at s = 7 and and hadronic top-quark background rejections are evaluated 8 TeV, including extensive studies of jet reconstruction and using Monte Carlo simulation.
  • Charm and Strange Quark Contributions to the Proton Structure

    Charm and Strange Quark Contributions to the Proton Structure

    Report series ISSN 0284 - 2769 of SE9900247 THE SVEDBERG LABORATORY and \ DEPARTMENT OF RADIATION SCIENCES UPPSALA UNIVERSITY Box 533, S-75121 Uppsala, Sweden http://www.tsl.uu.se/ TSL/ISV-99-0204 February 1999 Charm and Strange Quark Contributions to the Proton Structure Kristel Torokoff1 Dept. of Radiation Sciences, Uppsala University, Box 535, S-751 21 Uppsala, Sweden Abstract: The possibility to have charm and strange quarks as quantum mechanical fluc- tuations in the proton wave function is investigated based on a model for non-perturbative QCD dynamics. Both hadron and parton basis are examined. A scheme for energy fluctu- ations is constructed and compared with explicit energy-momentum conservation. Resulting momentum distributions for charniand_strange quarks in the proton are derived at the start- ing scale Qo f°r the perturbative QCD evolution. Kinematical constraints are found to be important when comparing to the "intrinsic charm" model. Master of Science Thesis Linkoping University Supervisor: Gunnar Ingelman, Uppsala University 1 kuldsepp@tsl .uu.se 30-37 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Standard Model 3 2.1 Introductory QCD 4 2.2 Light-cone variables 5 3 Experiments 7 3.1 The HERA machine 7 3.2 Deep Inelastic Scattering 8 4 Theory 11 4.1 The Parton model 11 4.2 The structure functions 12 4.3 Perturbative QCD corrections 13 4.4 The DGLAP equations 14 5 The Edin-Ingelman Model 15 6 Heavy Quarks in the Proton Wave Function 19 6.1 Extrinsic charm 19 6.2 Intrinsic charm 20 6.3 Hadronisation 22 6.4 The El-model applied to heavy quarks