A review of the open charm and open bottom systems Hua-Xing Chen1, Wei Chen2, Xiang Liu3;4, Yan-Rui Liu5 and Shi-Lin Zhu6;7;8 1School of Physics and Beijing Key Laboratory of Advanced Nuclear Materials and Physics, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China 2Department of Physics and Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 5E2, Canada 3School of Physical Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China 4Research Center for Hadron and CSR Physics, Lanzhou University and Institute of Modern Physics of CAS, Lanzhou 730000, China 5School of Physics and Key Laboratory of Particle Physics and Particle Irradiation (MOE), Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China 6School of Physics and State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China 7Collaborative Innovation Center of Quantum Matter, Beijing 100871, China 8Center of High Energy Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] and [email protected] September 2016 Abstract. Since the discovery of the first charmed meson in 1976, many open-charm and open-bottom hadrons were observed. In 2003 two narrow charm-strange states Ds∗0(2317) and Ds1(2460) were discovered by the BaBar and CLEO Collaborations, respectively. After that, more excited heavy hadrons were reported. In this work, we review the experimental and theoretical progress in this field. arXiv:1609.08928v2 [hep-ph] 3 Mar 2017 PACS numbers: 14.40.Lb, 14.40.Nd, 14.20.Lq, 14.20.Mr, 14.40.Rt Keywords: Charmed mesons, Bottom mesons, Charmed baryons, Bottom baryons, Exotic states Submitted to: Rep. Prog. Phys. Contents 1 Introduction4 CONTENTS 2 1.1 From QED to QCD . .4 1.2 Quark Model . .6 1.2.1 Quark potential models . .7 1.2.2 Coupled channel and screening effects . 10 1.2.3 Quark pair creation (QPC) models . 12 1.2.4 QCD potential . 13 1.3 Regge trajectories . 14 1.4 Heavy quark symmetry and effective Lagrangians . 16 1.5 QCD sum rules . 19 1.6 Unsettled issues . 22 2 Experimental progress on heavy hadrons 23 2.1 The charmed mesons . 24 2.1.1 D and D∗................................ 24 ∗ ∗ 2.1.2 D0(2400), D1(2420), D1(2430), and D2(2460). 25 2.1.3 D(2550) and DJ (2580). 28 ∗ ∗ ∗ 0 2.1.4 D (2600), DJ (2650), and D1(2680) ................. 28 ∗ ∗ ∗ 0 2.1.5 D(2750), DJ (2740), D (2760), DJ (2760), D1(2760) , and ∗ − D3(2760) ............................... 29 ∗ ∗ 0 2.1.6 DJ (3000), DJ (3000), and D2(3000) ................. 30 2.2 The charmed-strange mesons . 30 ∗ 2.2.1 Ds and Ds ............................... 31 ∗ 2.2.2 Ds1(2536) and Ds2(2573). 32 ∗ 2.2.3 Ds0(2317) and Ds1(2460). 32 ∗ 2.2.4 DsJ (2632). 33 ∗ 2.2.5 Ds1(2700). 34 ∗ ∗ ∗ 2.2.6 DsJ (2860), Ds1(2860), and Ds3(2860). 35 2.2.7 DsJ (3040). 36 2.3 The bottom mesons . 37 2.3.1 B and B∗................................ 38 ∗ 0 ∗ 0 2.3.2 BJ (5732), B1(5721) , and B2 (5747) ................. 38 2.3.3 B(5970), BJ (5960), and BJ (5840). 40 2.4 The bottom-strange mesons . 41 ∗ 2.4.1 Bs and Bs ............................... 42 ∗ 0 ∗ 0 2.4.2 BsJ (5850), Bs1(5830) , and Bs2(5840) ................ 42 2.5 The charmed baryons . 44 + 2.5.1 Λc .................................... 46 + + 2.5.2 Λc(2595) and Λc(2625) ....................... 46 + + + 2.5.3 Λc(2765) ,Λc(2880) , and Λc(2940) . ............... 46 2.5.4 Σc(2455) and Σc(2520). 47 2.5.5 Σc(2800). 48 0 2.5.6 Ξc,Ξc, and Ξc(2645). 49 CONTENTS 3 2.5.7 Ξc(2790) and Ξc(2815). 49 0 2.5.8 Ξc(2930) ,Ξc(2980), Ξc(3055), Ξc(3080), and Ξc(3123). 49 0 0 2.5.9 Ωc and Ωc(2770) ............................ 52 2.6 The bottom baryons . 52 0 2.6.1 Λb .................................... 54 0 0 2.6.2 Λb(5912) and Λb(5920) ........................ 54 ∗ 2.6.3 Σb and Σb ................................ 55 0 ∗ 2.6.4 Ξb,Ξb and Ξb .............................. 56 − 2.6.5 Ωb .................................... 57 2.7 The doubly-charmed baryons . 57 2.8 The X(5568) . 58 3 Candidates of the conventional excited heavy mesons 59 3.1 The charmed mesons . 60 3.1.1 D(2550) and DJ (2580). 62 ∗ ∗ 3.1.2 D (2600) and DJ (2650). 64 3.1.3 D(2750) and DJ (2740). 65 ∗ ∗ ∗ 0 ∗ − 3.1.4 D (2760), DJ (2760), D1(2760) and D3(2760) ........... 67 ∗ ∗ 3.1.5 DJ (3000), DJ (3000) and D2(3000). 67 3.2 The charmed-strange mesons . 68 ∗ 3.2.1 Ds1(2700). 69 ∗ ∗ ∗ 3.2.2 DsJ (2860), Ds1(2860) and Ds3(2860). 72 3.2.3 DsJ (3040). 74 3.3 The bottom mesons . 74 ∗ 0 ∗ 0 3.3.1 BJ (5732), B1(5721) and B2 (5747) ................. 75 3.3.2 B(5970), BJ (5960) and BJ (5840). 77 3.4 The bottom-strange mesons . 79 ∗ 0 ∗ 0 3.4.1 BsJ (5850), Bs1(5830) and Bs2(5840) ................ 79 4 Candidates for the singly heavy baryons 82 4.1 The charmed baryons . 84 4.1.1 Λc(2595), Λc(2625), Ξc(2790) and Ξc(2815). 87 4.1.2 Λc(2765), Λc(2880), Λc(2940) and Σc(2800). 89 4.1.3 Ξc(2930), Ξc(2980), Ξc(3055), Ξc(3080) and Ξc(3123). 94 4.2 The bottom baryons . 95 4.2.1 Λb(5912) and Λb(5920). 96 5 The doubly and triply charmed baryons 98 6 Candidates for the exotic heavy hadrons 102 ∗ 6.1 The Ds0(2317) and Ds1(2460) . 102 6.1.1 Molecular scheme. 102 6.1.2 Tetraquark scheme. 106 CONTENTS 4 6.1.3 Conventional charmed-strange mesons with coupled-channel effects.107 6.1.4 Lattice QCD simulation. 111 6.1.5 Short summary. 112 6.2 The X(5568) . 113 7 Outlook and summary 117 1. Introduction 1.1. From QED to QCD There are four fundamental interactions in nature: the electromagnetic interaction, the weak interaction, the strong interaction, and gravitation. The electromagnetic interaction occurs between electrically charged particles, which is responsible for electricity and magnetism as well as light. We encounter the electromagnetic interaction and gravity every day. Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) is the underlying theory of the electromagnetic interactions. Its Lagrangian reads QED µ 1 µν L = ¯ iγ Dµ m FµνF ; (1) − − 4 where the gauge covariant derivative is defined as Dµ = @µ + ieAµ : (2) Here, (x) denotes the electron/positron field, Aµ is the electromagnetic field, Fµν = @µAν @νAµ, and γµ are Dirac matrices. − The electromagnetic interaction holds the electrons and protons together inside a single atom and leads to the gross, fine, and hyperfine structures of the line spectra. The electromagnetic interactions between the atoms appear as various chemical bonds, which bind the atoms to form the molecules and drive the chemical reactions. The residual electromagnetic interaction (together with some other sources) between the neutral molecules becomes the van der Waals force, which plays a fundamental role in condensed matter physics etc. The strong interaction, another fundamental interaction that occurs between quarks and gluons, is similar to the electromagnetic interaction in some aspects. In particle physics, Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) is the underlying theory of strong interactions. Its Lagrangian is similar to the QED one: QCD µ 1 a µν L = ¯i iγ (Dµ)ij mδij j G G (3) − − 4 µν a with the covariant derivative, which has the definition a a (Dµ)ij = @µδij igA T : (4) − µ ij a Here, i(x) is the quark/antiquark field and Aµ is the gluon field, both of which a a carry the color charge. γµ are Dirac matrices and Tij = λij=2 are the generators CONTENTS 5 of the SU(3) gauge group. The tensor of the gluon field strength is defined as a a a abc b c abc G = @µA @νA + gf A A , where f denotes the antisymmetric structure µν ν − µ µ ν constant of the group. Similar to the electromagnetic interaction, the strong interaction also has several ranges. On a larger scale about 1 to 3 fm, its residual strong interaction between the nucleons becomes the nuclear force, which binds the protons and neutrons into atomic nuclei. On the smaller scale less than 1 fm, the strong QCD interaction confines the quarks and gluons to form various color-singlet hadrons. The gross, fine and hyperfine structures also exist in the hadron spectra. An ideal platform to study these structures is the heavy hadrons containing one charm or bottom quark. In recent years there have been significant experimental developments on these heavy hadrons [1,2]. We shall review all these experimental progresses in Sec.2. We try to put them together into an integrated whole to let the readers know the current experimental status. We shall also review the experimental information on the four-quark state candidate X(5568), which was recently reported by the DØ Collaboration [3], but not confirmed by the LHCb and CMS collaborations [4,5]. However, different from QED, QCD is a non-Abelian quantum field theory. Because of the difficulty in understanding the nonperturbative nature of QCD at low energy, one has to rely on the effective theoretical approaches to study hadron properties. Various methods reflecting several aspects of QCD have been proposed, such as the relativistic quark model, the constitute quark model, the chiral quark model, the quark pair creation (QPC) model, the Regge trajectory phenomenology, the chiral unitary model, the QCD sum rule, and some effective Lagrangian theories/approaches, etc.