DOCSLIB.ORG

Passengers Charters in San Diego: a New Management Strategy 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Passengers Charters in San Diego: a New Management Strategy 1 Running head: Passengers Charters in San Diego: A New Management Strategy 1 Passenger Charters in San Diego: A New Management Strategy A Capstone Project by Diego de Waegh California State University Maritime Academy Passengers Charters in San Diego: A New Management Strategy 2 Abstract The Port of San Diego has recently been criticized for its ineffective management of illegal passenger charter operations, especially regarding small passenger vessels between 22-75ft in length). Illegal passenger charters are not permitted by the Port, the Coast Guard, or as is often the case, by both organizations. Illegal charters create a safety hazard to unknowing passengers and a loss of revenue to the Port. Currently, the Port of San Diego along with Harbor Police and the United States Coast Guard work in bilateral operations in hopes of decreasing illegal charter activity. Their combined efforts over the past few years, however, show little to no improvement in reducing illegal charter operators. As author of this project, I have firsthand experience with the issues illegal charters can cause. I manage a fleet of bareboat charter boats for Marina Sailing and spend the majority of my time at the docks, meeting passengers before charters and talking to other legal passenger charter operators. Legal charter operators have to jump through bureaucratic hurdles to run their businesses, and often they have to pay high premiums to Port authorized private marinas to pick up passengers. Using a well-structured system to increase legal charters, the Port of San Diego could capitalize on a steady revenue stream, all while increasing the safety of passengers in San Diego Bay by decreasing illegal passenger charters. Keywords: San Diego Boat Tours, Port of San Diego, illegal passenger charters, USCG ​ Passengers Charters in San Diego: A New Management Strategy 3 Introduction The Port of San Diego is a significant contributor to San Diego County’s local economy, with an economic output of roughly $4.4 billion in 2015 (Port of San Diego). The Port serves the local community in several ways: 1.Vastly different than most Ports globally, the Port of San Diego is also a managing partner of the San Diego International Airport. 2. The Port is a commercial hub for international imports & exports, dealing largely with imported cars and commodities. 3. The Port also acts as a base for several large military ships, aircraft carriers, and submarines. This is important since it pertains to national security. While most Ports have government stakeholders from various branches, in San Diego, the Navy is a top partner. San Diego is the number one Navy Base for the West coast, home to around 46 U.S. Navy ships and several other specialty vessels (Naval Technology). 4. In addition, the Port hosts tourists from all over the world by leasing land to popular waterfront hotels. 5. Furthermore, the Port manages the San Diego Harbor Police, a law enforcement agency responsible for patrolling: the San Diego International Airport, businesses on the Port land, and the San Diego Bay waterways. Passengers Charters in San Diego: A New Management Strategy 4 San Diego is a tourism hub for Southern California, boasting world renowned attractions such as SeaWorld, the convention center, Padres stadium, and seemingly endless miles of sandy beaches. In 2017, 35 million visitors to San Diego spent a total of about $10.8 billion in the local economy (San Diego Tourism Authority). In addition, San Diego is well located to see the whale migration and has excellent pelagic fishing. This influx of tourism has a strong effect on the Port of San Diego operations. The demand for passenger charters in San Diego Bay and cruises leaving out of San Diego increases year after year. The rise of new websites such as Yelp and TripAdvisor combined with the increasing popularity of social media platforms such as Instagram, give illegal charter business operators easy and cheap means of marketing their businesses. Since the existing regulatory system imposes barriers to entry and the enforcement of existing laws is inefficient, many boating tour operators prefer to avoid it altogether and run their businesses illegally. The Port of San Diego funds their operation with various streams of income. While the Port can successfully collect revenues from its real estate and wharfing operations, it has a harder time collecting fees specifically from small passenger boats on charters. Year after year, the USCG and Port of San Diego Harbor Police spend resources to decrease the amount of illegal passenger charters operating out of San Diego Bay. Their efforts hardly pay off because of the scale of the problem at hand. The scope of this project will focus on the Port of San Diego’s efforts to regulate passenger charters. The Port has a symbiotic relationship with the USCG; through bilateral operations they can enforce established safety and passenger transport regulations. This paper focuses on steps the Port of San Diego can take to further benefit from their relationship with the USCG and ensure safe waterways. The aim of the paper is to put Passengers Charters in San Diego: A New Management Strategy 5 forward a viable solution for the Port of San Diego to increase revenues from passenger charters and to incentivize illegal charters to comply with existing Coast Guard and Port regulations. For these goals to be achieved, the Port of San Diego needs to be presented with a realistic alternative to their current regulatory framework and the infrastructure they provide in regards to small vessel passenger charters. First, the stage will be set with an informative background section, explaining current USCG passenger regulations and Harbor Police operations, as they are both key in instrumenting a better solution to benefit from passenger charter fees. After the background section, the reader will be presented with current passenger charter issues facing the Port of San Diego. Finally, a proposed solution will be recommended based on well documented research, financial projections, current statistics and on the ground analysis. Literature Section There are two important parties responsible for managing passenger charters in San Diego Bay; the United States Coast Guard and the Port of San Diego. The USCG makes the rules and is largely responsible for regulating commercial boating operations nationwide, including passenger charters. The USCG can be seen regularly in San Diego Bay inspecting vessels for safety equipment, checking mariner credentials, and enforcing their boating code through citations and fines. On the other hand, the Port of San Diego is responsible for giving local marine businesses fair opportunities to operate in the bay. This is not an easy task, as it involves collecting passenger fees and providing adequate infrastructure. Currently, the Port handles small vessel passenger fees through third party businesses who are responsible for providing the Passengers Charters in San Diego: A New Management Strategy 6 infrastructure and permits. The Port of San Diego also helps the USCG with keeping boating passengers safe through their sponsorship of the San Diego Harbor Police. Definitions In order for the reader to gain a better understanding of this paper, below are some of the most commonly used terms and abbreviations. ● 6-Pack: A type of compensated passenger charter with a limit of six passengers. These are common for small fishing charters, small sailboat instruction, and other customer boat tours. ● Certificate of Inspection: COI shortened. This certificate is issued by the United States Coast Guard to vessels carrying passengers for hire. COIs are renewed yearly and give the operator the opportunity to carry as many passengers as the vessel can handle safely (United States Coast Guard). ● Passenger Charter: Shortened to Charter: A boating event in which passengers are paying for a tour. An example of a charter can be a sunset cruise in San Diego Bay, where passengers are paying an owner or company for a boat tour. Friends taking other friends out boating on their own vessel does not count as a charter, as there is no condition of a sale. ● District Code: Short for San Diego Unified Port District Code, the main piece of regulatory paperwork from the Port of San Diego. This code lays out the rules in San Diego Bay and Port of San Diego controlled land. This code also sets the authority of the San Diego Harbor Police. Passengers Charters in San Diego: A New Management Strategy 7 ● Illegal Passenger Charter: Often shortened as ‘Illegal Charter’ in this paper. This type of charter is not up to code with either the United States Coast Guard, the Port of San Diego, or any applicable state codes. Therefore, these types of events are considered running an illegal business operation. For the scope of this paper, illegal charters are breaking either business permit codes or passenger limit codes. This paper will not cover legal safety requirements for vessels, such as fire prevention systems, life jackets, flares, and sound signaling devices. ● Gross-Tons: Shortened as GT: A measurement unit for vessel weight. Used for classifying boats under United States Coast Guard regulations. For example, a 60 ft keel sailboat would be approximately 21 gross tons, a smaller 34 ft sailboat would be between 6-9 gross tons. ● OUPV - Operator of an Uninspected Passenger Vessel- This USCG license is issued to operators limited to six passengers and working on uninspected vessels. Usually for non-U.S. citizens or small scale operators. This is informally referred to as the 6-pack license in part because it allows operators to carry up to six paying passengers and crew on their uninspected craft up to 100 tons. ● USCG: United States Coast Guard: the main authority on the waterways of the United States. ● UPV - Uninspected Passenger Vessel - A passenger vessel which has not been formally inspected by the USCG.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spot LNG Charter Market Is Unexpected
    Tuesday March 31, 2020 Daily Briefing Leading maritime commerce since 1734 LEAD STORY: Saudis join floating storage surge Saudis join floating storage as oil surplus strains land-based capacity surge as oil surplus strains WHAT TO WATCH: land-based capacity Coronavirus: More cargo ship seafarers test positive Lockdown brings Indian subcontinent ship scrapping to a halt Capital dispute with AISSOT traced to sanctions fear Coronavirus: Singapore allows crew changes under special circumstances OPINION: Lifting Trump’s tariffs on China could boost the medical supply chain ANALYSIS: Coronavirus: No let-up in boxship blank sailings Coronavirus: Støhle says ‘buoyant’ SAUDI ARABIAN OIL trader Aramco Trading Co has reportedly spot LNG charter market is chartered three very large crude carriers for floating storage, joining unexpected companies including Shell, Vitol and Trafigura that have hired tankers MARKETS: to profit from an oversupply of crude and refined products amid China Merchants orders four plunging prices. multipurpose ships and sells three small tankers The Kingdom’s storage play suggests that ATC is running out of land- China Merchants Port warns on based capacity as the coronavirus lockdown slashes oil demand by 20% weakening economic outlook over March and April. ATC leases or owns land-based storage tanks off Fujairah, Yanbu, Ain Sukhna and Malaysia, according to its annual Coronavirus: Trucker shortage report. delaying cargo at Indian ports IN OTHER NEWS: One of the three ATC-chartered VLCCs was listed as Cosgrand Lake, Coronavirus: Call for seafarers to be owned by Chinese shipowner Cosco, according to shipbroker reports. regarded as ‘key personnel’ Asahi to build first battery-powered The other two were also said to be Cosco-owned tonnage.
    [Show full text]
  • Bill of Lading—Pivotal to the International Sale Transaction
    Mohammad Abdur Razzak: “Bill of Lading: A Pivotal Document in International Sale Transactions” published by Bangladesh Bar Council in its law journal titled “Bangladesh Legal Decision” (BLD) in November Volume, 2005, Pp 29-44. 1 BILL OF LADING: A PIVOTAL DOCUMENT IN INTERNATIONAL SALE TRANSACTIONS Mohammad Abdur Razzak LL.B & LL.M: University of Dhaka; LL.M: Nottingham University, UK Advocate Supreme Court of Bangladesh (High Court Division) 1. Introduction:1 “Sale of goods” is a common phenomenon in modem world. This transaction may take place among the merchants trading within the territory of a country. The contract of sale of goods may also be concluded between two or more persons carrying on their trade in different countries governed by different legal systems which involves cross border movement of goods. In sale transactions of the latter kind, which is called “contract of international sale of goods”,2 a question invariably posed as to how the seller will accomplish his obligation to deliver the stipulated goods to the buyer beyond his country. Usually, the parties at the very outset settle whether the goods will move by water ways, air ways or by road or by a combination thereof. The water ways being less costly and widely spread out reaching the remote corners of the earth majority of the sale transactions are effected over water ways by sea going vessels. At this stage, the parties to a sale transaction get involved in contract of afreightment in order to obtain the service of a sea going vessel for onward transmission of the goods.3 The contract of afreightment may either be in the form of charterparty4 or in the form of bill of lading.
    [Show full text]
  • Exercise Lien on Cargo
    Exercise Lien On Cargo phonotypicRog still tocher and nostalgicallytrustless Huntlee while mollycoddling compulsive Cary quite spruces detachedly that paper-cutter.but hewing her Unenvied evaporators Salmon insincerely. still swipe: erringly.Demolished and doglike Husein rappels her zibets cross-reference while Irvin parenthesize some remorse Whether or cargo on the background to be made save or maritime law of competing claims There is what rule whether the deduction of frog for mark to some loss your cargo. May be sold to exercise liens for freight demurrage storage. 57 A lien on sub-freight clause serves only could provide the shipowner the. The cargo on such principle, as a lien in exercising a monetary claim, as a suit despite being exercised? Exercise his lien irrespective of whether though the time specified for discharge the opposite still belongs to the shipper or charterer who are liable via the. Death or collision Cargo rack or loss Unpaid freightdemurrage Pollution. Ocean Cargo Lines Ltd v North Atlantic Marine Co 227 F. A Shipowner's Lien on Sub-Sub-Freight in England and the. 30515 even stand it extends to interstate shipments requires carrier notification that it must exercise a lien on future shipments if payment of bulk due freight charges. Maritime Liens Penn Law exchange Scholarship Repository. The Kimball 70 US 37 Casetext Search Citator. The sneakers of lading is standing by the buyercargo receiver to bold the charterer has sold the bounce The shipowner wants to associate whether art can dive a lien on. Unpaid Freight and Shipowners Right to Maritime Lien. A carrier's lien on freight extends to facility and all monies the shipper owes it.
    [Show full text]
  • Coffee Shipments by Chartered Vessels
    LOGISTICS COMMITTEE SUBCOMMITTEE ON CHARTERING COFFEE SHIPMENTS BY CHARTERED VESSELS COFFEE SHIPMENTS BY CHARTERED VESSELS TABLE OF CONTENTS I INTRODUCTION II THE CARGO BROKERS III VESSEL SUITABILITY IV PAYMENT OF FREIGHT V DISCHARGE OF PLACE OF REST VI CLAIMS VII THE CHARTER PARTY AGREEMENT VIII DEFINITIONS IX ABBREVIATIONS I INTRODUCTION In recent years the transporting of coffee on voyage chartered vessels has represented an increasing share of the shipments into the United States and Canada. Also noted is an increase in the number of participants involved in each chartered voyage. The Terms and conditions incorporated in and added to the Charter Party Agreements generally being used at present have evolved by years of honing through experiences, trial and error. The G.C.A. Traffic & Warehouse Committee decided that a fresh and thorough review of the present relevant terms, conditions and practices would be beneficial to the coffee industry as a whole. Thus, this subcommittee was formed to perform this review, to propose any recommended actions and to provide information for the benefit of the members of the Green Coffee Association of N.Y.C., Inc. SUBCOMMITTEE MEMBERS Donald A. Pisano Farr Man Coffee, Inc. William Bajorski Saks International, Inc. John Callahan Johnson & Higgins, Inc. Douglas Martocci, Sr. Continental Terminals, Inc. CONSULTANTS Joe Carroll Gateway Chartering Corp. David Benham Victor B. Benham & Co. Ltd. This brieflet is the product of the Subcommittee on Chartering of the Traffic and Warehouse Committee of the Green Coffee Association of N.Y.C., Inc. Several key areas of concern have been addressed and hopefully clarified herein or incorporated as clauses to the Charter Party.
    [Show full text]
  • Charter Parties (I)
    1 UNIT TWELVE CHARTER PARTIES (I) A charter party is a document of contract by which a shipowner agrees to lease, and the charterer agrees to hire, a vessel or all the cargo space, or a part of it, on terms and conditions forth in the charter party. If permitted to do so by the terms of charter party, the charterer may enter into subcontracts with other shippers. The main types of charter parties are Bareboat Charter Party (sometimes called a Demise Charter). Time Charter Party and Voyage Charter Party. If your vessel is chartered it is of the utmost importance that you read the charter party carefully, especially the added clauses, until it is thoroughly understood. It is advisable to have the officers read it as a matter of information and instruction and it will do no harm to discuss it with them, especially with the chief officer. The important clauses should be check-marked for quick reference. If any refer to dates of the notification of ETA to consignee or charterer's agent, make a note of the day the message is to be sent and be sure to send it. 1 2 Bareboat Charter Party. By this type of charter, the shipowner leases his entire vessel and the charterer has the responsibility of operating it as though it were his own vessel. As the name implies, the bare vessel is chartered. The shipowner has, for the period covered by the charter party, lost control of his vessel. The charterer pays all expenses: fuel, stores, provisions, harbour dues, pilotage, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Insurance of Risks Under the Bareboat Charter Contract
    Zbornik PFZ, 67, (1) 85-105 (2017) 85 INSURANCE OF RISKS UNDER THE BAREBOAT CHARTER CONTRACT Marija Pijaca, Ph. D. * UDK: 368.23 Božena Bulum, Ph. D. ** 347.795:368.23 Izvorni znanstveni rad Primljeno: ožujak 2016. The bareboat charter contract may appear to be a simple contractual relation: the owner gives to the charterer a vessel for the performance of a sea-going activity, and charterer pays hire to the owner. However, this contractual relation is very complex and the complexity of this contract can be seen in the complex system of legal relations of the parties that arises from the provision of vessel for use. Based on the complexities of mutual rights and obligations of the parties to a bareboat charter contract, an issue of insurance also arises in a very complex form. The hull and machinery insurance and liability insurance are intertwined and therefore there is a very real possibility that some interests might be missed and left unin- sured. Therefore, it is necessary to establish with certainty who is obliged to take out hull and machinery and liability insurance and to establish all other aspects of insurance specific for this type of vessel employment. The aim of this paper is to ascertain the characteristics of bareboat charter contract insurance, especially hull and machinery and liability insurance, and, also, to analyse the manner in which the issue of bareboat charter contract insurance is standardized by the provisions of the BIMCO Standard Bareboat Charter, code name BARECON 2001. This standard contractual form is most often used in the practice of bare- boat charter contracting and therefore it is deemed necessary to establish whether or not its provisions provide broad enough coverage of bareboat charter contract insurance.
    [Show full text]
  • Shipping Case Digest
    Shipping case digest Consolidated edition January – June 2019 hilldickinson.com Contents January - 2019 May - 2019 The “FREE GODDESS”: time extensions The “ELENI P”: owners unable to claim 3 - 4 27 - 28 by consent must be notified to the court hire whilst vessel detained by pirates Volcafe: Supreme Court clarifies who Pan Ocean -v- China-Base: clear and has the legal burden of proof for 5 - 6 precise written confirmation required 29 - 30 damage to cargo under the Hague Rules for exclusive jurisdiction clause under Brussels Recast February - 2019 The Chartered Institute of Arbitrators The “FOUR ISLAND”: Court considers -v- B; C and D: instituting changes to the 31 - 32 whether arbitration clause in 7 duty of confidentiality in arbitrations charterparty applied to subsequent settlement agreement June - 2019 Nautical Challenge -v- Evergreen: The “RENOS”: Supreme Court decides Collision case returns to the High Court 8 - 9 what costs should be included in 33 - 34 for the assessment of damages owners’ CTL calculation Kaefer -v- AMS Drilling: Court of Appeal 10 - 11 The “ATLANTIC TONJER”: payment confirms test to establish jurisdiction 35 - 37 made or disputed within agreed period March - 2019 UTB LLC- v- Sheffield: application The M/V “ARCTIC”: is the obligation to of Disclosure Pilot and privileged 38 - 39 12 - 14 keep the vessel in class absolute? communications Globalink -v- DHL: right of set-off and 15 - 17 freight forwarding contracts A -v- B: When should experts’ reports be 18 - 19 excised for inadmissibility? April - 2019 The “LADY M”: can an owner be exempt under the Hague-Visby Rules for a fire 20 - 22 started by his own crew Michael Wilson & ‘Partners’ Ltd -v- John Forster Emmott: removing the Angel 23 - 24 Bell exception from a freezing injunction Lambert -v- VJ Glover Limited and Friday: 25 - 26 the extent of a skipper’s duty of care hilldickinson.com January 2019 Griffin Underwriting Limited -v- Ion G.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF of Chapter V in English As Amended to 2009
    PART V MARITIME COMMERCE CHAPTER I MARINE ENTERPRISE SECTION I SHIPS Article 740 (Definition of Ship) A ship mentioned in this Act is a vessel used for navigation for the purpose of commercial activities or any other profit-making transactions. [This Article Wholly Amended, Aug. 3, 2007] Article 741 (Scope) (1) The provisions of this Part shall apply mutatis mutandis to the ships used for navigation even if they are not used for the purpose of commercial activities or any other profit-making transactions: Provided , That notwithstanding the proviso of Article 29 of the Ship Act, the above shall not apply to national or public ships, if it is determined by the Presidential Decree that the mutatis mutandis application of the provisions of this Part is not appropriate considering the purpose and character, etc. of navigation. (2) The provisions of this Part shall not apply to small boats or to any vessel propelled mainly by oars. [This Article Wholly Amended, Aug. 3, 2007] Article 742 (Accessory to Ship) Any article entered in the ship's inventory of appurtenances shall be presumed to be an accessory to the ship. [This Article Wholly Amended, Aug. 3, 2007] Article 743 (Transfer of Ownership of Ship) Where a ship is eligible for registration and entry, the transfer of the ownership of the ship shall take effect only by an agreement between the parties: Provided , That such transfer shall not be asserted against a third party unless it has been registered and an entry thereof has been made in the ship's nationality certificate. [This Article Wholly Amended, Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tramp Shipping Market
    The Tramp Shipping Market Produced by Clarkson Research Studies April 2004 This report is presented as an economic description of the Tramp shipping market. Clarkson Research has no experience of the terms or expressions used under competition law. This report has been prepared by Clarkson Research and com- missioned by the European Community Shipowners' Associa- tions (ECSA) (supported by the International Chamber of Ship- ping). Data in this publication is prepared by Clarkson Research Stud- ies for the use of Clarkson subscribers and may not be repro- duced without the written permission of Clarkson Research Studies. The information contained in this report is believed to be correct but the accuracy thereof is not guaranteed and the Company and its employees cannot accept liability for loss suf- fered in consequence of reliance on the information contained herein. This report does not obviate the need to make further appropriate enquiries and inspections. Executive Summary MAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF THE TRAMP MARKET 1. Globally competitive markets 2. Close to perfect competition model 3. Different sub-market segments in response to customer needs 4. Competition between sub-market segments for cargo 5. Volatile and unpredictable demand 6. Many small entrepreneurial shipping companies 7. Global ship trading patterns including “cross trades” 8. Ease of entry and exit 9. Very cost effective 1. This report is intended to provide a briefing on the organization and competitive economic structure of the tramp shipping industry. The nature of the world shipping business 2. The international shipping industry transported 6.2 billion tonnes of cargo in 2003 (Table A1.4), with a fleet of 26,280 deep sea cargo ships (see Table 3 below).
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Law INTRODUCTION
    An Open Access Journal from The Law Brigade (Publishing) Group 34 Maritime Law Written by Kunal Almadi 4th Year BA LLB (H) Student, Amity University INTRODUCTION Transportation of products and travelers by water is a standout amongst the most antiquated channels of business on record. This method of transportation was and still is fundamental for global exchange since ships are fit for conveying massive goods which generally would not be conveyed. Tenets representing connections among members of ocean transport have additionally been known since c.1st thousand years BC. Old oceanic principles got from the traditions of the early Egyptians, Phoenicians and the Greeks who conveyed a broad business in the Mediterranean Sea. The most punctual oceanic code is credited to the island of Rhodes which is said to have affected Roman law. It is for the most part acknowledged that the soonest oceanic laws were the Rhodian Sea Laws, which have been guaranteed to date from 900 B.C., yet which more probable showed up in the shape perceived today amid the period from 500 to 300 B.C. These laws were perceived in the Mediterranean world as a strategy for giving unsurprising treatment of vendors and their vessels. The many-sided quality and tender loving care found in the Rhodian Sea Laws exhibited the modernity of business and exchange of Ancient Greece – a universe of business, the focal point of which, Rhodes, was in a position to manage terms for exchange. In spite of the fact that the decay of Greece and the ascent of the Roman Empire altered the impact of the Rhodian Sea Law, a uniform code in light of the Rhodian Law remained and was perceived as basic to quiet and beneficial Mediterranean exchange: the Mediterranean Sea was for more than one thousand years [300 B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Interplay Between Mortgage and Bareboat Charter Registration
    World Maritime University The Maritime Commons: Digital Repository of the World Maritime University World Maritime University Dissertations Dissertations 2012 Discordant regimes : the interplay between mortgage and bareboat charter registration Ryan Acosta Federo World Maritime University Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.wmu.se/all_dissertations Part of the Corporate Finance Commons Recommended Citation Federo, Ryan Acosta, "Discordant regimes : the interplay between mortgage and bareboat charter registration" (2012). World Maritime University Dissertations. 3. https://commons.wmu.se/all_dissertations/3 This Dissertation is brought to you courtesy of Maritime Commons. Open Access items may be downloaded for non-commercial, fair use academic purposes. No items may be hosted on another server or web site without express written permission from the World Maritime University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WORLD MARITIME UNIVERSITY Malmö, Sweden DISCORDANT REGIMES: THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN MORTGAGE AND BAREBOAT CHARTER REGISTRATION By RYAN ACOSTA FEDERO Philippines A dissertation submitted to the World Maritime University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In MARITIME AFFAIRS (MARITIME LAW AND POLICY) 2012 Copyright Ryan Acosta Federo, 2012 DECLARATION I certify that all the materials in this dissertation that are not my own work have been identified, and that no material is included for which a degree has previously been conferred on me. The contents of this dissertation reflect my own personal views, and are not necessarily endorsed by the University. (Signature): ____________________________ (Date): ____________________________ Supervised by: Assoc. Prof. Maximo Q. Mejia Jr. World Maritime University Assessor: Prof. Proshanto Mukherjee Institution/organization: World Maritime University Co-assessor: Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • 1989 SEMINAR KNOKKE ZOUTE .Pdf 1.94 MB
    C.M.I. COMITE MARITIME INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON BAREBOAT CHARTERPARTIES REPORT KNOKKE-ZOUTE APRIL 1989 SEMINAR ON BAREBOAT CHARTERPARTIES INDEX List of Speakers and Members of Secretariat Page 1 List of Participants Page 2-8 Opening Address by Mr. W. Birch Reynardson Page 9 Presentation of General Papers: Purpose for which the bareboat charterparty is used: Professor F. Berlingieri Pages 10-15 Rights and obligations: a) Dr. B. Kroger Pages 16-27 b) Mr. W. Birch Reynardson Pages 28-35 Allocation of risks and costs: a) Professor J. Ramberg Pages 36-46 b) Mr. J. Kimball Pages 47-58 Bareboat charter for newbuilding: a) Mr. J. Alcantara Pages 59-63 b) Professor W. Tetley Pages 64-78 Bareboat charter for trading ships: a) Professor T. Falkanger Pages 79-84 b) Mr. R. Heward Pages 85-90 Analysis of contract clauses: Mr. M. Wilford Pages 91-98 Registration and mortgage security: Dr. P. Ehlermann Pages 99-108 Registration of ships under bareboat charter with particular reference to dual registration: Mrs. Vesna Polio Curcio Pages109-118 5. Report on discussion session: April6 Pages119-123 6. Summing up by Professor F. Berlingieri Pages124-128 7. Special papers. Appendix Pages 1-25 SPEAKERS Professor F. BERLINGIERI (President, C.M.I.) Mr. W. BIRCH REYNARDSON (Rapporteur) Mr. J. ALCÁNTARA Mrs. V. POLIC CURCIC Dr. P. EHLERMANN Professor T. FALKANGER Mr. R. HEWARD Mr. J. KIMBALL Dr. B. KROGER , Professor J. RAMBERG Professor W. TETLEY Mr. M. WILFORD SECRETARIAT Mr. G.E. BOUTON Miss J. CHALLENOR (Seminar Secretary) Mrs. P. LAWRENCE Mrs. A. PHILIPPART Miss H.
    [Show full text]