Laos Mcgovern-Dole Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Laos Mcgovern-Dole Project Foreign Agricultural Service, United States Department of Agriculture La s McGovern-Dole Project o BAS LINE EVALUATION OctoberE 2018 USDA McGOVERN-DOLE FY17 BASELINE STUDY IN LAOS Final Report Program: McGovern-Dole Food for Education and Childhood Nutrition Agreement Number: FFE-439-2017-/022-00 Funding Year: Fiscal Year 2017 Project Duration: 2017-2021 Implemented by: World Food Programme Evaluation Authored by: NRMC Bhaskar Goswami Malay Das Ankita Singh Prapti Barooah DISCLAIMER: This publication was produced at the request of the United States Department of Agriculture. It was prepared independently by NRMC. The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Department of Agriculture or the United States Government. based decisionbased making - Decentralized Evaluation Decentralized evidence evaluation for USDA Mc-GOVERN DOLE FY17 BASELINE STUDY IN LAO PDR [FY 17-21] Final Report October 2018 WFP Country Office Lao PDR Mr. Utomo Tjipto, WFP Lao PDR Evaluation Manager Prepared by Team Leader: Bhaskar Goswami Team Member: Malay Das, Ankita Singh, Prapti Barooah Acknowledgements The NRMC evaluation team wishes to acknowledge the guidance, support and cooperation received from all the participants in the evaluation. NRMC takes this opportunity to extend sincere thanks to the distinguished Government officials at the Ministries, provincial level and district level for their time and precious inputs. The NRMC Evaluation Team expresses its gratitude to Ada Ihenachor and Tracy Johnson from USDA for their valuable suggestions and guidance for the evaluation. We would like to thank the members of RBB, Felicity Chard and Yumiko Kanemitsu, for sharing their useful insights. Their suggestions have immensely helped in enhancing the design of the evaluation. We would also like to thank the staff of international development agencies (The World Bank, UNICEF, UNFPA, Australian DFAT, Plan International, Big Brother Mouse, SNV, and GIZ) who kindly took the time to meet us and give us their views on the school feeding programme in Lao PDR. NRMC wishes to sincerely acknowledge the support and guidance received from the staff of the WFP Lao PDR Country Office, for assisting with the planning of and facilitating the evaluation mission, and for supplying documentation, especially to Sarah Gordon Gibson, Nanna Skau, Utomo Tjipto, Yangxia Lee, Serena Mithbaokar, Air Sensomphone, Khizar Ashraf, Outhai Sihalath, Phetsamone Southalack, Kevin Howley, Thai Thao, and the WFP staff from the Pakse and LuangNamtha sub-offices. We are grateful to the team from Geo-Sys for their partnership with the NRMC evaluation team throughout the period of evaluation, particularly for their untiring efforts for data collection. Last but not the least, the evaluation team wishes to acknowledge the cooperation received from all informants, including school children, school head, teachers, parents, cooks, storekeepers and VEDC members, during the primary survey. Disclaimer The opinions expressed in this report are those of the Evaluation Team, and do not necessarily reflect those of the World Food Programme. Responsibility for the opinions expressed in this report rests solely with the authors. Publication of this document does not imply endorsement by WFP of the opinions expressed. The designation employed and the presentation of material in maps do no imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WFP concerning the legal or constitutional status of any country, territory or sea area, or concerning the delimitation of frontiers. USDA Mc-Govern Dole FY 17 Baseline Study in Lao PDR Draft Report Table of Contents Acknowledgements List of Acronyms Executive Summary 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Overview of the Study Subject ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Context ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3. Study Methodology and Limitations .......................................................................................................... 5 2. Study Findings ................................................................................................................................ 10 2.1. Key baseline findings ....................................................................................................................................... 10 2.2. Relevance of MGD SFP FY17 in Lao PDR ............................................................................................... 13 2.3. Effectiveness of MGD-SFP FY17 ................................................................................................................. 15 2.4. Sustainability of MGD-SFP FY17 ................................................................................................................ 25 2.5. Theory of Change for MGD-SFP FY17 ..................................................................................................... 29 3. Conclusions and Recommendations ........................................................................................ 37 3.1. Overall Assessment/Conclusions .............................................................................................................. 37 3.2. Lessons Learned ................................................................................................................................................ 40 3.3. Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................ 41 Annexes .................................................................................................................................................... 44 Annex A Scope of Work for Baseline Study .................................................................................................. 44 Annex B Stakeholders and Report Users ....................................................................................................... 46 Annex C Map of the Intervention Area .......................................................................................................... 49 Annex D WFP SFP 2017-21coverage ............................................................................................................... 50 Annex E Project-Level Results Framework of WFP-Laos PDR MGD FY17-21 .......................... 51 Annex F Programme Objectives, Outcomes and Activities .................................................................. 54 Annex G Performance Indicator Targets for MGD-FY17 Program ................................................... 56 Annex H Funding for WFP School Feeding Programme......................................................................... 62 Annex I Programme Graduation Timeline .................................................................................................. 64 Annex J Role of WFP's partners in MGD SFP ................................................................................................... 65 Annex K Status of Poverty, Nutrition and Education in Lao PDR, 2012 ........................................ 67 Annex L Profile of Programme Provinces ..................................................................................................... 70 i USDA Mc-Govern Dole FY 17 Baseline Study in Lao PDR Draft Report Annex M ODA Assistance to Lao PDR ............................................................................................................... 74 Annex N Evaluation Mission Schedule ............................................................................................................ 77 Annex O Statistical Matching Technique........................................................................................................ 84 Annex P Key Baseline Questions and Evaluation Matrix ...................................................................... 86 Annex Q Documents Gathered ............................................................................................................................ 99 Annex R Sample Size Covered by Provinces and Respondent Category .................................... 103 Annex S List of Sample Schools ....................................................................................................................... 105 Annex T Data Analysis Methods ...................................................................................................................... 109 Annex U Baseline Values of Key Indicators ............................................................................................... 111 Annex V Baseline Values of Other Key Performance Indicators .................................................... 121 Annex W Indicator wise Findings .................................................................................................................... 131 Annex X Other Performance Indicators ...................................................................................................... 149 Annex Y Theory of Change ................................................................................................................................. 151 List of Tables Table 1:
Recommended publications
  • Nam Theun 2 Hydroelectric and Social and Environment Projects
    LAO PEOPLE’S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC Nam Theun 2 Hydroelectric and Social and Environment Projects Report No. 153963 DECEMBER 16, 2020 © 2021 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org Attribution—Please cite the work as follows: World Bank. 2021. Lao People’s Democratic Republic—Nam Theun 2 Hydroelectric and Social and Environment Projects. Independent Evaluation Group, Project Performance Assessment Report 153963. Washington, DC: World Bank. This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS The material in this work is subject to copyright. Because The World Bank encourages dissemination of its knowledge, this work may be reproduced, in whole or in part, for noncommercial purposes as long as full attribution to this work is given. Any queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to World Bank Publications, The World Bank Group, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax: 202-522-2625; e-mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Nam Theun 2 Hydroelectric Project SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
    Nam Theun 2 Hydroelectric Project SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Public Disclosure Authorized - ADDENDA AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, JANUARY 2005 - VOLUME 1: INTRODUCTION AND CROSS-CUTTING ISSUES Public Disclosure Authorized VOLUME 2: NAKAI PLATEAU – EMDP AND RAP VOLUME 3: DOWNSTREAM AREAS – EMDP, RESETTLEMENT AND LIVELIHOOD RESTORATION VOLUME 4: Public Disclosure Authorized PROJECT LANDS RESETTLEMENT (ACQUISITION AND COMPENSATION) PLAN Public Disclosure Authorized Nam Theun 2 Hydroelectric Project SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN - ADDENDA AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, JANUARY 2005 - Summary Table of Content VOLUME 1: INTRODUCTION AND CROSS CUTTING ISSUES Vol. 1 Chapters: 1 Introduction 2 Project Description 3 Legal and Policy Framework 4 Public Consultation, Participation and Disclosure 5 Health Impact Assessment and Public Health Action Plan 6 Organisational Framework and Responsibilities 7 Institutional Capacity Building and Staff Training 8 Risk Management Framework, Monitoring and Evaluation 9 EMDP Executive Summary Appendices: A Concession Agreement B Relevant Safeguard Policies of IFIs (WB and ADB) C National Legal and Policy Documents D Legal Instruments specific to the NT2 Project (Social Component) E Gender Action Plan – Addendums and Edits for SDP F IAG and POE Comments on the SDP G National Public Consultation Workshop H Bibliography VOLUME 2: NAKAI PLATEAU – EMDP AND RAP VOL. 2 PART 1: INTRODUCTION Executive Summary 10 Geographical Framework, Description of Impacts and Entitlements 11 Baseline Data – Nakai Plateau VOL. 2 PART 2: ETHNIC
    [Show full text]
  • GMS Nam Theun 2 Hydroelectric Project
    Environment and Social Monitoring Report Annual Progress Report January-December 2017 LAO PDR: GMS Nam Theun 2 Hydroelectric Project Prepared by the Environment and Social Division of Nam Theun 2 Power Company, Ltd. This environment and social monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. NAM THEUN 2 POWER COMPANY LTD Environment & Social Progress Report Period Jan 2017 to Dec 2017 Nam Theun 2 Power Company Ltd. E&S Progress Report Jan 2017-Dec 2017 This report is a revised version of the E&S Annual Progress Report, Jan to Dec 2017, produced by the E&S Unit of Nam Theun2 Power Co. Ltd. The report has been edited for public release. Nam Theun 2 Power Company Ltd. Nam Theun 2 Hydroelectric Project Annual Progress Report Environment and Social Division Jan – Dec 2017 Nam Theun 2 Power Company E&S Annual Progress Report - 2017 Nakai Plateau Resettlement and Environmental Programs Table of Contents Acronyms .................................................................................................................................................... iii General Introduction ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (LMHR) Joint UPR Submission Lao People's
    FIDH (International Federation for Human Rights) Lao Movement for Human Rights (LMHR) Joint UPR submission Lao People’s Democratic Republic 35th session (January - February 2020) 18 July 2019 FIDH (International Federation for Human Rights) Address: 17, Passage de la Main-d’Or 75011 Paris, France; Tel.: +33 (0)1 43 55 25 18; Fax: +33 (0)1 43 55 18 80 Website: http://www.fidh.org/ Email: [email protected] Lao Movement for Human Rights (LMHR) Address: BP 123 - 77206 Torcy Cedex, France; Tel./Fax: +33 (0)1 60 06 57 06 Website: http://www.mldh-lao.org/ Email: [email protected] 1 1. The join FIDH-LMHR Universal Periodic Review (UPR) submission focuses on the following human rights issues in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (PDR) since the second UPR cycle, which began in January 2015: freedom of opinion and expression; freedom of peaceful assembly; freedom of association; enforced disappearances; torture; prison conditions; freedom of religion or belief; the right to participate in the design and implementation of infrastructure and investment projects; and the right to take part in the conduct of public affairs. Information presented in this report has been collected from: 1) the analysis of publicly available documents; 2) research using primary sources; and 3) second- hand information which is specifically referenced in endnotes. Freedom of expression severely repressed 2. Despite its UPR commitment to ensure the right to freedom of opinion and expression, the government has continued to severely limit the exercise of this right. 3. During the second UPR of the Lao PDR, the government accepted four of the 14 recommendations it received with regard to freedom of opinion and expression.
    [Show full text]
  • UXO/Mine Action in Lao PDR
    2014 ANNUAL REPORT This document acts as Annual Report of the National Regulatory Authority for UXO/Mine Action in Lao PDR. For further information, please contact the: National Regulatory Authority for UXO/Mine Action Sector in Lao PDR (NRA) Sisangvone Village, P.O. Box 7621, Unit 19, Saysettha District, Vientiane, Lao PDR Website: www.nra.gov.la Telephone: (856-21) 262386 Donation for UXO victims: your support can make a difference. Your contribution to the National Regulatory Authority for UXO/Mine Action in Lao PDR can support for families and children whose lives have been suffered by the UXO from the Indo-China War. For how to give, please contact Victim Assistance Unit of the National Regulatory Authority for UXO/Mine Action in Lao PDR, Mr. Bountao Chanthavongsa via email: [email protected] Compiled and designed by: Vilavong SYSAVATH and Olivier BAUDUIN Photos: Photos that appear in the Operator Reports, unless individually credited, were taken by and are the property of that Operator. All other photos in this report, unless individually creditied, have been taken by the following people - Vilavong SYSAVATH Acknowledgements: The NRA would like to thank all UXO/Mine Action Sector Operators who provided images and information on their projects and activities in 2014 for this report. The NRA Programme and Public Relations Unit would also like to acknowledge the support and effort put in by all Members of the NRA team in helping to compile the UXO Sector Annual Report 2014. This report may be subject to change after publication. To find out more about changes, errors, or omissions please visit the website: www.nra.gov.la.
    [Show full text]
  • Microfinance in the Lao Pdr, 2009
    MICROFINANCE IN THE LAO PDR, 2009 EDITORIAL BOARD Mr. Souphith DARACHANTHARA Deputy Director General, National Economic Research Institute Survey Team Leader ‐ Analyst, Editor Mr. Phokhong THEPKAYSONE Director, Development Research Division Survey Team Leader Assistant ‐ Analyst Mr. Thanongsai SOUKKHAMTHAT Deputy Director, Development Research Division Project Coordinator ‐ Analyst Ms. Phoutthasone SINTHAVONG Ms. Dorkfa SIYOTHA Ms. Viengsavanh SOULIYA Mr. Bounmy SOUTPILA Survey and Research Team Members Prof. (em.) Dr. Hans Dieter Seibel Mr. Klaus Prochaska GIZ Project Director Editors CONTENTS Page FOREWORD………………………………………………………………………………………………………i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................... iii Chapter 1: Microfinance in the Lao PDR ............................................................. 1 1.1. Background and History of Microfinance in the Lao PDR ............................................................ 1 1.2. From Microcredit to Microfinance: the Terminology of an Emerging Sector .............................. 2 1.3. The Emergence of Village Fund Networks ................................................................................... 3 1.4. The Microfinance Working Group for Lao P.D.R……………………………………………………………………….4 1.5. The Regulatory Framework of Microfinance ............................................................................... 4 Chapter 2: Governmental and International Support Programs .................... 6 2.1. Government Programs and Projects…………………………………………………………………………………………6
    [Show full text]
  • Lao Movement for Human Rights (LMHR) FIDH – International Federation for Human Rights
    Lao Movement for Human Rights (LMHR) FIDH – International Federation for Human Rights United Nations Human Rights Committee (CCPR) – 123rd session Joint shadow report LAO PDR Table of contents 2….Article 2: Domestic legislation inconsistent with the Lao PDR’s obligations under the ICCPR 2….Article 6: Death sentences still imposed for crimes that are not ‘the most serious’ 3….Article 7: Torture of inmates “common” 4….Article 9: Government critics arbitrarily detained, enforced disappearances unaddressed 6….Article 10: Prison conditions below international standards, children detained 8….Article 14: Flawed trials amid denial of legal assistance 9….Article 18: Christian minorities persecuted 10..Article 19: Freedom of expression severely repressed, criminalized 13..Article 21: Freedom of peaceful assembly restricted 14..Article 22: Space for civil society virtually non-existent 16..Article 25: Elections not “genuine” in the one-party state 16..Article 27: Rights of ethnic minorities denied The civil and political rights situation in the Lao PDR remains dire. The present shadow report, jointly submitted by FIDH and LHMR as part of the United Nations (UN) Human Rights Committee (CCPR)’s review of the Lao PDR, documents numerous and serious human rights violations committed by Lao PDR authorities and illustrates the government’s failure to comply with its obligations under the provisions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). The Lao PDR’s initial report under Article 40 of the ICCPR was submitted by the government in 2017, seven years after the original 2010 deadline. The government report is essentially a list of legislative provisions and incomplete statistics, and contains no details on how domestic laws and government policies and actions comply with the provisions of the ICCPR.
    [Show full text]
  • Thammasat Institute of Area Studies (TIARA), Thammasat University
    No. 06/ 2017 Thammasat Institute of Area Studies WORKING PAPER SERIES 2017 Regional Distribution of Foreign Investment in Lao PDR Chanthida Ratanavong December, 2017 THAMMASAT UNIVERSITY PAPER NO. 09 / 2017 Thammasat Institute of Area Studies, Thammasat University Working Paper Series 2017 Regional Distribution of Foreign Investment in Lao PDR Chanthida Ratanavong Thammasat Institute of Area Studies, Thammasat University 99 Moo 18 Khlongnueng Sub District, Khlong Luang District, Pathum Thani, 12121, Thailand ©2017 by Chanthida Ratanavong. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit including © notice, is given to the source. This publication of Working Paper Series is part of Master of Arts in Asia-Pacific Studies Program, Thammasat Institute of Area Studies (TIARA), Thammasat University. The view expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the Institute. For more information, please contact Academic Support Unit, Thammasat Institute of Area Studies (TIARA), Patumthani, Thailand Telephone: +02 696 6605 Fax: + 66 2 564-2849 Email: [email protected] Language Editors: Mr Mohammad Zaidul Anwar Bin Haji Mohamad Kasim Ms. Thanyawee Chuanchuen TIARA Working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. Comments on this paper should be sent to the author of the paper, Ms. Chanthida Ratanavong, Email: [email protected] Or Academic Support Unit (ASU), Thammasat Institute of Area Studies, Thammasat University Abstract The surge of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) is considered to be significant in supporting economic development in Laos, of which, most of the investments are concentrated in Vientiane.
    [Show full text]
  • The Seventh Five-Year National Socio- Economic Development Plan (2011-2015)
    LAO PEOPLE’S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC PEACE INDEPENDENCE DEMOCRACY UNITY PROSPERITY The Seventh Five-year National Socio- Economic Development Plan (2011-2015) (Full Version) (The initial session of the Seventh National Assembly, during June 15-24, 2011, at National Assembly, Vientiane Capital) Ministry of Planning and Investment Vientiane, October 7, 2011 1 TABLE OF CONTENT PREAMBLE .......................................................................................................................................... 8 PART ONE: EVALUATION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FIVE‐YEAR SOCIO‐ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN VI (2006‐2010) .............................................................................................. 10 I. GLOBAL, REGIONAL AND NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT ....................................................................... 10 1.Global and regional environment ......................................................................................... 10 [1]. Advantages ................................................................................................................... 11 [2]. Challenges and constraints ........................................................................................... 11 2. National environment .......................................................................................................... 11 [1]. Advantages ................................................................................................................. 12 [2]. Challenges and constraints .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • [Draft Implementing Decree for New FIL]
    Authentic in Lao Only LAO PEOPLE’S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC Peace Independence Democracy Unity Prosperity Prime Minister’s office No. 301/PM Vientiane Capital, dated 12 October 2005 Decree of the Prime Minister Regarding the Implementation of The Law on the Promotion of Foreign Investment - Pursuant to the Law on the Government of the Lao PDR No. 02/NA, dated 6 May 2003; - Pursuant to the Law on the Promotion of Foreign Investment No. 11/NA, dated 22 October 2004; - Referencing to the proposal of the President of the Committee for Planning and Investment. SECTION I General Provisions Article 1. Objective This Decree is set out to implement the Law on the Promotion of Foreign Investment correctly to the objectives and uniformly throughout the country on the principles, methods and measures regarding the promotion, protection, inspection, resolution of disputes, policies towards productive persons and measures against the violators. Article 2. Legal Guarantees The State provides legal guarantees to foreign investors who are established under the Law on the Promotion of Foreign Investment as follows: 2.1 administer by Law and regulation on the basis of equality and mutual interests; 2.2 undertake all of the State’s obligations under the laws, international treaties in which the State is a party, the Agreement Regarding the Page 1 of 61 Promotion and Protection of Foreign Investment and the agreements that the government has signed with the foreign investor; 2.3 do not interfere with the legally business operation of foreign investors. Article 3. Capital Contribution which is an Intellectual Property The State recognizes the shared capital contribution of the enterprises which is an intellectual property; the evaluation of the intellectual property value shall be determined in detail by the scope of rights, obligations and interest in the resolution of a shareholders’ meeting and the business joint venture agreement of the enterprise.
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture Development Strategy to 2025 and Vision to 2030
    Agriculture Development Strategy to 2025 and Vision to the year 2030 Sectoral Vision and Aims “Ensuring food security, producing comparative and competitive agricultural commodities, developing clean, safe and sustainable agriculture and shift gradually to the modernization of a resilient and productive agriculture economy linking with rural development contributing to the national economic basis” Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry May 2015 Lao People’s Democratic Republic Peace Independence Democracy Unity Prosperity Government No. 53/GoV Vientiane Capital, dated 20-2-2015 Decree on Endorsement and Declaration of the Agriculture Development Strategy to the year 2025 and Vision to the year 2030 Pursuant to the Law of the Government of the Lao PDR No. 02/NA, dated 6 May 2003. Pursuant to the Decision of the Lao Government regular monthly Conference of May 2015 No. 06/GoL, dated 02 July 2014. With reference to the proposal of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry No. 1258/MAF, dated 26 August 2014. The Government issues Decree: Article 1: To officially endorse and declare the “Agriculture Development Strategy to the year 2025 and Vision to the year 2030”. Article 2: To authorize the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry in collaboration with concerned ministries-equivalent organizations and local authorities to effectively study, enhance and implement the Agriculture Development Strategy to the year 2025 and Vision to the year 2030. Article 3: The concerned Ministries, Ministerial equivalent Organizations, Vientiane Capital, Provinces and other concerned organizations to aware, accept and implement this Decree strictly and effectively. Article 4: This Decree shall enter into force from the date it is signed.
    [Show full text]
  • Gibbon Conservation Action Plan for Lao PDR 2011-2020
    Lao People’s Democratic Republic Peace Independence Democracy Unity Prosperity Gibbon Conservation Action Plan for Lao PDR 2011-2020 Division of Forest Resource Conservation Department of Forestry Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Lao PDR May 2011 Gibbon Conservation Action Plan for Lao PDR 2011 to 2020 © Copyright of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Department of Forestry, Division of Forest Resource Conservation, Lao PDR, 2011 All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the Division of Forest Resource Conservation, Department of Forestry, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry of Lao PDR. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Department of Forestry Division of Forest Resource Conservation PO BOX: 811, Vientiane, Lao PDR Tel: 856‐21‐215000 / 856‐21‐216921 Fax: 856‐21‐215004 / 856‐21‐217161 Citation: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF), 2011. Gibbon Conservation Action Plan for Lao PDR. Division of Forest Resource Conservation, Department of Forestry. Vientiane, Lao PDR. Technical support from International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Lao PDR and Fauna & Flora International Funding support from the United States Embassy to Lao PDR, the Arcus Foundation, the Mohammed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund Cover page design: Phaivanh Phiapalath and Chaynoy Sisomphan Cover photographs: Background photo for the front and back cover pages by Phaivanh Phiapalath/IUCN and Northern white‐cheeked gibbons (Nomascus leucogenys) photo by Terry Whittaker. The back cover photo was taken in Phou Hin Poun NPA and shows Mr. Souli Thammavong from Nakai District Agriculture and Forestry Office in action during a gibbon survey, February 2011.
    [Show full text]