Shathla, Village Survey Of, Part-VI-No-3, Vol-XX, Himachal
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
CENSUS OF INDIA 1961 VOLUME XX-PART VI-NO.3 H '1 MAC HAL P R A DES H SHATHLA A Village Survey of umarsain Sub-Tehsil, Mahasu District Field Investigation and Draft by CHUNI LAL SHAR MA Editor RAM CHANDRA PAL SINGH of the Indian Administrative Service Superintendent of Census Operations Himachal. Pradesh ~& :.....,'~' ~ .... ........ : .. ~: :.: ':.. ~. '. -'" . '-',' . .. ': • ~"1"" I' • : ........... :~ ......~:: .......: . '\.. "\" \ . " . ........ \ :..... \ . ···} .... ~.ttwJ :,;. • :• 11""v : . .......... Contents FOREWORD ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vi PREFACE vii I. THE VILLAGE Introduction-History and Name-Physical Aspects-Flora & Fauna- Water Sources-Climate-Rainfall and Conjiguration Important Public Places. 2. THE PEOPLE 8 Castes-Residential Patlern--House/lOld Goods- Utensils-Dress -Ornaments - Food and Drinks-Birth, Marriage alld Death Customs. 3. ECONOMY 20 Sources of Income-Occupational Pattern~Workers and Non workers - Income - Expenditure - Agriculture - Horlicu/lure Ownership of Land-Animal Husbandry-Village Craft. 4. SOCIAL AND CULTURAL LIFE 38 Common beliefs-Village Temples and Deities-Family-lnter Caste Relationship-Fairs and Festivals-Dance and Drama Taboos and Superstifiofls-Recr{'aUOll and Hospifalily- Community Development - Panc!zayat-------"Co-operatil'e Society - Credit and Thrift balik-Delia! Sud/wr Committee-Education-Medical. 5. CONCLUSION 50 6. APPENDICES 52 ApPENDIX I ApPENDIX 11 ApPENDIX III 1966 PRINTED IN lNDlr\. BY THE MANAGER CAMBRIDGE PRINTING WORKS DELHI FOR THE MANAGFR OF PUBLICATIONS CIVIL LINES DFLHI Foreword A PAR T from laying the foundations of demography in this subcontinent, a hundred years of the Indian Census has also produced 'elaborate and scholarly accounts of the variegated phenomen of Indian life sometimes' with no statistics attached, but usually with just enough statistics to give empirical under-pinning to their conclusions'. In a country, largely illiterate, wher;e statistical or nume rical comprehension of even such a simple thing as age was liable to be inaccurate, an understanding of the social structure was essential. It was more necessary to attain a broad understanding of what was happening around oneself than to wrap oneself up in 'statistical ingenuity' or 'mathematical manipulation.' This explains why the Indian Census came to be interested in 'many by-paths and 'nearly every branch of socholarship, from anthropology and sociology to geography and religion'. In the last few decades the Census has increasingly turned its efforts to the presentation of village statistics. This suits the temper of the times .as well as our political and economic structure. For even as we have a great deal of centrali zation on the one hand and decentralization on the other, my colleagues thought it would be a welcome continuation of the Census tradition to try to invest the dry bones of village statistics with flesh-and-blood accounts of social structure and social change. It was accordingly decided to select a few villages in every State for special study, where personal observation would be brought to bear on the interpretation of statistics to find out how much of a village was sta~ic and yet changing and how fast the winds of change were blowing and from where. Randomness of selection was, therefore, eschewed. There was no intention to build up a picture for the whole State in quantitative terms on the basis of villages selected statistically at random. The selection was avowedly purposive: the object being as much to find out what was happening and how fast to those villages which had fewer reasons to choose change and more to remain lodged in the past as to discover how the more 'normal' types of villages were changing. They were to be primarily type studies which, by virtue of their number and distribution, would also give the .reader a 'feel' of what was going on and sollie kind of a map of the country. A bri~f account of the tests of selection will help to explain. A minimum of thirty-five villages was to be chosen with great care to represent adequately geo graphical, occupational and even ethnic diversity. Of this minimum of thirty five, the distribution was to be as follows: (a) At least eight villages were to be so selected that each -of them would contain one dominant community with one predominating occupation, e.g., fishermen, forest workers, jhum cultivators, potters, weavers, salt-makers, quarry workers etc. A village should have a mInimum population of 400, the optimum being between 500 and 700. IV FOREWORD (b) At least seven villages were to be of tional mobility. This was followed up in March numerically prominent Scheduled Tribes of the 1960 by two specimen schedules, one for each house State. Each village could represent a particular hold, the other for the village as a whole, which. tribe. The minimum population should be 400, apart from spelling out the mode of inquiry suggest the optimum being between 500 and 700. ed in the September 1959 conference, introduced groups of questions aimed at sensing changes in (c) The third group of vill~ges should each attitude and behaviour in such fields as marriage. be of fair size, of an old and settled character and inheritance, moveable and immoveable property, contain variegated occupations and be, if possible industry, indebtedness, education, community life multi-ethnic in composition. By fair size was and collective activity, social disabilities forums of meant a population of 500-700 persons or more. appeal over disputes, village leadership, and organi The village should mainly depend on agriculture sation of cultural life. It was now plainly the· and be sufficiently away from the major sources of intention to provide adequate statistical support to modern communication such as the district ad empirical 'feel', to approach. qualitative change ministrative headquarters and business centres. through statistical quantities. 1t had been diffi It should be roughly a day's journey from the cult to give thought to the importance of 'just above places. The villages were to be selected enough statistics. to give empirical underpinning with an eye to variation in terms of size, proxi to conclusion', at a time when my colleagues were mity to city and other means of modern communi straining themselves to the utmost for the success cation, nearness to hills, jungles and major rivers. of the main Census Operations, but once the census Thus there was to be a regional distribution through count itself was left behind in March, 1961, a out the State of this category of villages. If, series of three regional seminars in Trivandrum however, a particular district contained significant (May 1961), Darjeeling and Srinagar (June 1961) ecological variations within its area, more than one restored their attention to this field and the impor village in the district might be selected to study tance of tracing social change through a number of the special adjustments to them. well-devised statistical tables was once again It is a unique feature of these village surveys recognized. This itself presupposed a fresh that they rapidly outgrew their original terms of survey of villages already done; but it was worth reference, as my colleagues warmed up to their the trouble in view of the possibilities that a work.· This proved for them an absorbing voyage close analysis of statistics offered and also of discovery and their infectious enthusiasm com because the 'consanguinity' schedule remained pelled me to enlarge the inquiry's scope again and to be convassed. By November 1961, however, again. It was just as well cautiously to feel one's more was expected of these surveys than ever way about at first and then venture further afield, before. There was dissatisfaction on the one and although it .accounts to some extent for a hand with too many general statements and a certain unevenness in the quality and coverage of growing desire on the other to draw conclusions, the monographs, it served to compensate the purely from statistics, to regard social and economic data honorary and extra-mural rigours of the task. as interrelated processes, and finally to examine For, the Survey, along with its many ancillaries the social and economic processes set in motion like the survey of fairs and festivals, of small and through land reforms and other laws, legislative rural industry and others, was an 'extra', over and administrative measures, technological and and above the crushing load of the 1961 Census. cultural change. Finally, a study camp was or ganised in the last week of December 1961 when the It might be of interest to recount briefly the stages whole field was carefully gone through over again by which the Survey enlarged its scope. At the and a programme worked out closely knitting the first Census Conference in September 1959 the various aims of the Survey together. The social Survey set itself the task of what might be called a Studies Section of the Census Commission rendered record in situ of material traits, like settlement assistance to State Superintendents by way of patterns of the village; house types ; diet; dress ; scrutiny and technical comment on the frame of ornaments and foot-wear; furniture and storing Survey and presenta~io~ of results. vessels; common means of transport of goods and passengers; domestication of animals and This gradual unfolding of the aims of the Survey birds ; markets attended; worship of dieties; prevented my colleagues from adopting as many festivals and fairs. There were to be recordings, villages as they had originally intended to. But I of course, of cultural and social traits and occupa- believe that what may have been lost in quantity FOREWORD v has been more than made up for in quality. This Indian Census its title to 'the most fruitful single is, perhaps, for the first time that such a Survey has, source of information about the country.' Apart been conducted in any country, and that purely from other features, it will perhaps be conceded as a labour of love.