DOCSLIB.ORG

Dart) Inquiry

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dart) Inquiry 1 Neil Winzer 24th April 2014 12 Holleton Terrace Padbury Western Australia 6025 Phone: 045 046 2526 Email: [email protected] Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee CANBERRA ACT 2600 Phone: (02) 6277 3535 Email: [email protected] Dear members of the References Committee GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO THE DEFENCE ABUSE RESPONSE TASKFORCE (DART) INQUIRY I will address the followings terms of reference: a. the Defence Abuse Response Taskforce (DART) process to date; and f. any related matters. I would like to think it is a sign of the system of government working that my submissions of 3.12.13 and 7.1.14 to Senator David Johnston the Minister for Defence and related submissions of 20.1.14, 28.1.14, 10.2.14, 18.2.14, 24.2.14 and 8.4.14 to the Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade have contributed in some way to the decision to conduct this inquiry. However, there is no tangible reason for such thinking in that I have yet to be even provided an acknowledgement to any of those submissions. Notwithstanding my full understanding of the fact that in conducting the inquiry the References Committee will not be in a position resolve the dispute that has caused me to make this submission, I must attempt to capture your understanding as to the most basic facts to that dispute. An attempt to capture your understanding is necessary in that the record of the performance of Senator David Johnston, now the Minister for Defence, and Mr Len Roberts-Smith QC, now the DART Chairman, is integral to that dispute. The dispute is associated with a claim that I initiated regarding corruption in the Western Australian public sector and my claim of a campaign of abuse I was subjected to as a result of that initiative. Index Terms of Reference page a. THE SELECTION OF A CHAIRPERSON FOR THE DART 7 Was Roberts-Smith QC aware of my claim that I was being abused as a 8 consequence of initiating a public interest disclosure before making his report of 14.8.08 as the WA Corruption and Crime Commissioner? Did grounds exist for Roberts-Smith QC at any time during the period of his 37 appointment to the CCC (May 2007 to January 2011) to be aware of my formal claim that he is corrupt and, prior to his DART appointment, aware that the claim had not been addressed let alone resolved? f. THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF SENATOR DAVID JOHNSTON AS THE 57 MINISTER FOR DEFENCE REGARDING MY CONCERNS ABOUT 2 ROBERTS-SMITH QC SIMPLE AND VERIFIABLE DATA SHOWING THAT ONLY A SHAM 61 INVESTIGATION WAS CONDUCTED BY MR ROBERTS-SMITH QC Notwithstanding the format of this submission as indicated in the above index it is I believe absolutely necessary that I first draw your attention to the simple and verifiable data regarding the advice I put to Premier Court on 23.11.99 that “Transport [my employing department] have never responded to my claims by way of a written or verbal explanation”. To this day that advice has not been addressed in an accountable and transparent way by any authority with the power to achieve a resolution. Moreover, I believe it is necessary that the References Committee consider the 14.8.08 determination of Mr Roberts-Smith QC as the WA Corruption and Crime Commissioner that was / is grossly at odds with court transcript and what Parliament was advised from 2000 to 2004 regarding “a written or verbal explanation”. Furthermore, I believe it is in the public interest that consideration be given to the fact that Senator Johnston in 2006, having been provided copies of that court transcript and advice to Parliament, advised that “the erosion of time casts an undeniable ambiguity over the facts”. Senator Johnston has not responded to my correspondence from 3.12 13 regarding these matters. My presentation of the simple and verifiable data to the References Committee is in the form of a four-page brief on three claims of perjury I‟ve selected for this submission from a total of 14 claims of perjury before Mr Roberts-Smith QC when he was the WA Corruption and Crime Commissioner and a two-page brief on the report signed by Mr Roberts-Smith QC on 14.8.08 featuring the following determination: While there is no evidence of a detailed written response to Mr Winzer‘s concerns, there is evidence to support the proposition that he did receive a response from various officers in DOT [Department of Transport], albeit those responses were not in writing. „Whistleblowing‟ is essentially about placing significant others in a position of having to decide whether to tell the truth about the evidence before them or alternatively, due to considerations as to friendships, philosophical alignments, career aspirations and the like, telling other than the truth. My fundamental argument from 18.9.98 when I submitted my claim of corruption formally was that Transport misled agencies, Parliament and psychiatrists they obliged me to see by advising they had addressed my claim. Documentation referred to in my two-page brief on the report signed by Mr Roberts-Smith QC shows that Transport‟s argument was based on a „Winzer failed when asked to substantiate his claim‟ / „Winzer’s claim has been addressed‟ pattern of advice fabricated from the content and process of a meeting I was obliged to attend on 29.1.99. I pointed to the existence of records of my questions and advice beginning three years before my formal claim and the non-existence of a record of Transport having addressed my preceding questions or the formal claim. As I put to Premier Court on 23.11.99 my claim was never discussed with me. As to the determination made by Mr Roberts-Smith QC in regard to it being sufficient in public interest terms that my claim of corruption was “discussed” with me, the transcript of the testimony of all the officers in a position giving them a responsibility for such a “discussion” can be accessed by „Googling‟ neilwinzer.wordpress.com and the post Detail – no investigation. 3 Please contemplate the fact that I had pressed the package of perjury claims and „existence / non-existence‟ of records data in submissions to every conceivable public sector agency and avenue of the WA Parliament for ten years before Mr Roberts-Smith QC produced his report. It should I believe be critical to the contemplations of the References Committee that the record on the performance of the agencies and Parliament comprises of approximately one half that presented an excuse of some type or another to avoid having to address my claim and the other half that cited substance in my claim or called for a genuine investigation. For detail on this „50-50‟ record „Google‟ neilwinzer.wordpress.com and refer to the post Honest and dishonest identified. I approached Senator Johnston following his comments that may be seen on the Senate Hansard database of 14.6.06 under the heading Matters of Public Interest. Senator Johnston‟s comments were about “… conduct which gives rise to alarm at the integrity and management capacity of senior [WA] police, particularly the commissioner [Karl O‟Callaghan]” and included: There is only one word to describe the police conduct in this matter: corrupt. I do not use this word lightly or without great consideration, but I maintain my assessment, given their conduct. I provided Senator Johnston with the package of perjury claims and the „existence/non- existence‟ of records data and advice on the apparent situation of two members of the panel that selected Commissioner O‟Callaghan being simultaneously under criminal investigation. I also provided Senator Johnston with documents as to an investigation in accordance with my submissions featuring the two selection panel members in the corruption I disclosed. I explained to Senator Johnston that the key facts to the situation involve clear documentary evidence of the Police, during their thirty-month „investigation‟, having failed to advise me of their relationship with those two individuals and, after the appointment, Commissioner O‟Callaghan refusing to respond to my questions as to the possibility of a conflict of interest. It is relevant to note that the period of my dealings with Senator Johnston fell between the dates of parliamentary questions tabled by Hon Peter Collier MLC, now a Minister, and Hon Paul Omodei MLA, then Leader of the Opposition. Those questions were clearly aimed at exposing the cover-up and were based on references to strong support given previously in the form of recognition of the substance of the simple and verifiable data. On 12.10.05 Hon P Collier questioned the Premier, Deputy Premier and Minister for Transport (then Planning and Infrastructure). On 20.11.07 and 28.11.07 Hon P Omodei questioned the Premier. However, on 26.10.06 Senator Johnston advised me of "problems in investigating the various allegations you have made, as the erosion of time casts an undeniable ambiguity over the facts in a number of ways.” He re-stated that view in 2008 as the Minister for Justice. Mr Roberts-Smith QC provided his report on 14.8.08 that I contend was based a three-part strategy to affect a cover-up: 1. Regarding my perjury claims the Police argument that “it was simply that some matters were in contention between the witnesses and Mr Winzer” was accepted; 4 2. My persistent requests for a formal interview and presentation of documentation concerning the claim that the Police acted with a conflict of interest involving the two members of the panel that selected the Police Commissioner were refused; and 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Report 2006–07
    annual report 2006–07 CEDA Level 5, 136 Exhibition Street Melbourne 3000 Australia Telephone: (03) 9662 3544 Fax: (03) 9663 7271 Email: [email protected] Web: ceda.com.au About this publication Annual Report 2006–07 © CEDA 2007 ISSN 1832-8822 This publication is available on CEDA’s website: ceda.com.au For an emailed or printed copy, please contact the national office on 03 9662 3544 or [email protected] Design: Robyn Zwar Graphic Design Photography: Sean Davey/BRW, iStockphoto, Jason McCormack, Paul Lovelace Photography, Photonet, Yusuke Sato contents What is CEDA? ...............................................................2 Chairman’s report...........................................................4 CEO’s report...................................................................5 Review of operations......................................................6 Membership .............................................................7 Research ...............................................................12 Events.....................................................................16 International activity.................................................23 Communications ....................................................25 Governance..................................................................28 Concise financial report................................................34 Overview.................................................................35 Directors’ report ......................................................38 Income statement....................................................41
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Heat Treatment This Is a List of Greenhouse Gas Emitting
    Heat treatment This is a list of greenhouse gas emitting companies and peak industry bodies and the firms they employ to lobby government. It is based on data from the federal and state lobbying registers.* Client Industry Lobby Company AGL Energy Oil and Gas Enhance Corporate Lobbyists registered with Enhance Lobbyist Background Limited Pty Ltd Corporate Pty Ltd* James (Jim) Peter Elder Former Labor Deputy Premier and Minister for State Development and Trade (Queensland) Kirsten Wishart - Michael Todd Former adviser to Queensland Premier Peter Beattie Mike Smith Policy adviser to the Queensland Minister for Natural Resources, Mines and Energy, LHMU industrial officer, state secretary to the NT Labor party. Nicholas James Park Former staffer to Federal Coalition MPs and Senators in the portfolios of: Energy and Resources, Land and Property Development, IT and Telecommunications, Gaming and Tourism. Samuel Sydney Doumany Former Queensland Liberal Attorney General and Minister for Justice Terence John Kempnich Former political adviser in the Queensland Labor and ACT Governments AGL Energy Oil and Gas Government Relations Lobbyists registered with Government Lobbyist Background Limited Australia advisory Pty Relations Australia advisory Pty Ltd* Ltd Damian Francis O’Connor Former assistant General Secretary within the NSW Australian Labor Party Elizabeth Waterland Ian Armstrong - Jacqueline Pace - * All lobbyists registered with individual firms do not necessarily work for all of that firm’s clients. Lobby lists are updated regularly. This
    [Show full text]
  • Imagereal Capture
    RED LIGHT ON SEX WORK IN WESTERN AUSTRALIA THOMAS CROFTS and TRACEY SUMMERFIELD fter several failed attempts, the former Labor Government’,4 but to have the courage to deal with government in W estern Australia was finally prostitution in a non-moralistic way. A able to enact legislation to introduce a licensing system for sex work. W hile not condoning sex work, Opposition to the Prostitution Amendment Labor saw the need to regulate ‘prostitution in a Act 2008 (W A ) manner that is conducive to public health, protects sex In 2003 the Labor government in W estern Australia workers from exploitation and protects children from produced a Prostitution Control Bill, based on a Bill being involved in or exposed to prostitution.’1 It felt from 2002, which sought to introduce a licensing REFERENCES that the best way to do this was through a minimalist system for sex work. However, as the government did 1. Second Reading, Prostitution decriminalised model, similar to that operating in N ew not hold the majority in the upper house and without Amendment Bill 2007, Western Australia, Zealand since 2003. This represents a simplified, less Parliamentary Debates, Legislative Assembly, the support of the Liberal Party or the minor parties 29 August 2008, 4468 (Jim McGinty, industry-specific model compared to other Australian the licensing parts of this Bill were rejected. This Bill, Attorney-General). jurisdictions, where licensing has been adopted. The which represented a ‘social control model’,5 was much 2. In NSW brothels are regulated like Prostitution Amendment Act 2008 therefore represents more invasive than the 2007 Bill because it took a any other business.
    [Show full text]
  • V-3-APR NOV 08 KERR PHILIPS WA Parliamentary Chronicle 10 …
    Western Australia Parliamentary Chronicle July 2007 to August 2008 Liz Kerr and Harry Phillips * The last fourteen months of the 37 th Parliament in Western Australia was marked by a level of controversy and the announcement of an early election to be held on 6 September 2008. Highlights included the findings of a number of parliamentary committees, the reports of the Corruption and Crime Commission (CCC) with some of its recommendations being questioned by the Parliamentary Inspector of the CCC. Once again the lobbying activities of former Labor Premier Brian Burke and Minister Julian Grill, together with former Liberal Party Senator Noel Crichton- Browne featured in the controversy, and in the 12 months to August 2008 there were three changes of leadership in the Opposition Liberal Party, as the party suffered from internal divisions and indiscretions. Meanwhile the State’s booming economy, which provided excellent indices in terms of growth, employment and investment, led observers to believe that the incumbent Labor Government would be returned to office. The major ‘one vote one value’ redistribution in 2007 contributed to this view as it gave more seats to metropolitan Perth in the Legislative Assembly which appeared to make it difficult for the Liberal and Nationals, historically the stronger parties in the country regions. The redistribution, however, gave rise to further tensions within the parties over pre-selections, leading to a spate of resignations and an increase in independent members, whose numbers had swelled from two to seven since the February 2005 election. A serious gas explosion on the North West shelf in early June 2008, high international oil prices and a bear stock market combined to further change the economic and political climate.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Chronicles
    Australian Journal of Politics and History: Volume 54, Number 2, 2008, pp. 289-341. Political Chronicles Commonwealth of Australia July to December 2007 JOHN WANNA The Australian National University and Griffith University The Stage, the Players and their Exits and Entrances […] All the world’s a stage, And all the men and women merely players; They have their exits and their entrances; [William Shakespeare, As You Like It] In the months leading up to the 2007 general election, Prime Minister John Howard waited like Mr Micawber “in case anything turned up” that would restore the fortunes of the Coalition. The government’s attacks on the Opposition, and its new leader Kevin Rudd, had fallen flat, and a series of staged events designed to boost the government’s stocks had not translated into electoral support. So, as time went on and things did not improve, the Coalition government showed increasing signs of panic, desperation and abandonment. In July, John Howard had asked his party room “is it me” as he reflected on the low standing of the government (Australian, 17 July 2007). Labor held a commanding lead in opinion polls throughout most of 2007 — recording a primary support of between 47 and 51 per cent to the Coalition’s 39 to 42 per cent. The most remarkable feature of the polls was their consistency — regularly showing Labor holding a 15 percentage point lead on a two-party-preferred basis. Labor also seemed impervious to attack, and the government found it difficult to get traction on “its” core issues to narrow the gap.
    [Show full text]
  • (DAVID) EVANS, MLA Condolence Motion
    PARLIAMENT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA HON HYWEL (DAVID) EVANS, MLA Condolence Motion Legislative Assembly Tuesday, 12 November 2019 Reprinted from Hansard Legislative Assembly Tuesday, 12 November 2019 ____________ HON HYWEL (DAVID) EVANS Condolence Motion MR M. McGOWAN (Rockingham — Premier) [2.01 pm] — without notice: I move — That this house records its sincere regret at the death of Hon Hywel (David) Evans and tenders its deep sympathy to his family. Today the Assembly acknowledges the passing of a long-serving member of this chamber, Hon Hywel David Evans, former member for Warren. I would like to acknowledge the family and friends of David who are here in the chamber today for this event. From a glance at the guest list, it is probably one of the biggest turnouts of family and friends I have ever seen for a condolence motion. There are far too many names to mention, but I would like to acknowledge David’s children, who are here today, Michael, Megan and Claire; their partners; and David’s grandchildren. David was born in Penygraig, in the south of Wales, in December 1924. His parents were Tudor and Tydfil. At a young age, he immigrated to Western Australia and was educated in the south west at Pemberton State School and Bunbury High School. Education had some impact on Dave, as he began to make moves to become a teacher, serving as what was known as a monitor teacher in Pemberton in 1942. This was the time of the Second World War. In January 1943, at the age of 18, like many of his generation, David enlisted in the Royal Australian Air Force.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Chronicles Commonwealth of Australia
    Australian Journal of Politics and History: Volume 53, Number 2, 2007, pp. 281-336. Political Chronicles Commonwealth of Australia July to December 2006 JOHN WANNA Australian National University and Griffith University Howard’s Divisive Style Comes to the Fore: Never Recant, Never Stand-down, Gradually Give Ground Questioned in late 2006 over the wisdom of invading Iraq, Prime Minister John Howard insisted he did not agree with those who went about “recanting everything they supported when they were in positions of authority”. He argued that […] in public life you take a position, and I think particularly of the decisions I have taken in the time I have been prime minister. I have to live with the consequences of those both now and into the future. And if I ever develop reservations, I hope I would have the grace to keep them to myself, because I think you take a position and you have got to live by that and be judged by it (Australian, 22 November 2006). His message was simple: if he had any personal reservations about invading Iraq he was not about to admit it or to say sorry. By late 2006, the Iraq occupation increasingly overshadowed the internal politics of both the US and the UK, but in Australia the quagmire of Iraq was a far less potent political factor. As one of the original “coalition of the willing”, Howard was implicated in the decision but had far less at stake than the other leaders and no list of casualties to inflict political pain. Moreover, the Labor opposition had not managed to turn the unpopular war into a political positive for itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Mr Paul Omodei; Mr Rob Johnson; Mr Alan Carpenter; Mr Colin Barnett; Mr Bob Kucera; Deputy Speaker
    Extract from Hansard [ASSEMBLY - Wednesday, 1 November 2006] p8038d-8049a Speaker; Mr Paul Omodei; Mr Rob Johnson; Mr Alan Carpenter; Mr Colin Barnett; Mr Bob Kucera; Deputy Speaker PREMIER - FAILURE TO ENFORCE MINISTERIAL STANDARDS AND RESPONSIBILITIES Matter of Public Interest THE SPEAKER (Mr F. Riebeling): Today I received within the prescribed time a letter from the Leader of the Opposition seeking to debate as a matter of public interest the following motion - That this house condemns the Premier for his failure to enforce standards of ministerial accountability and responsibility. If sufficient members agree to this motion, I will allow it. [At least five members rose in their places.] The SPEAKER: The matter shall proceed on the usual basis. MR P.D. OMODEI (Warren-Blackwood - Leader of the Opposition) [2.56 pm]: I move - That this house condemns the Premier for his failure to enforce standards of ministerial accountability and responsibility. Standards of ministerial accountability and responsibility in this state are at rock bottom under this government. Senior bureaucrats in this state are being used as human shields to cover the incompetence of Labor ministers. In the past three weeks alone, two senior bureaucrats have left the public service after their departments mishandled serious allegations of child abuse. However, the two incompetent ministers who were responsible for the mess in the first place remain in their positions. The Attorney General has talked about ministers being asleep at the wheel. If ever there have been cases of ministers being asleep at the wheel, it is the cases that have come before this Parliament over the past few months.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Law in the State of Western Australia: an Overview
    Electoral Law in the State of Western Australia: An Overview Third edition Electoral Law in the State of Western Australia: An Overview Harry C.J. Phillips This book celebrates 100 years of the Electoral Act 1907 Western Australian Electoral Commission Perth 2008 (Third edition 2013) First published in 2008 by the Western Australian Electoral Commission. Third edition 2013. © Western Australian Electoral Commission This book is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Enquiries should be made to the publisher. Bibliography ISBN 978 0 9804173 4 0 This book celebrates 100 years of the Electoral Act 1907. Printed by State Law Publisher HARRY C.J. PHILLIPS Contents Foreword................................................................................................... xi Acknowledgments ...................................................................................... xii Abbreviations............................................................................................. xii Chapter One: The Colonial Legacy........................................................... 1 The Colonial Franchise ..................................................................... 1 The Colonial Voting System............................................................. 5 Constituency Boundaries................................................................... 6 Administration of the
    [Show full text]
  • 19A-Wa Election Article Good Edited Final
    The Western Australian Election of September 6, 2008: The First Chink in Labor’s Armour William Bowe * Introduction From a national perspective, the Western Australian state election of September 6, 2008 was remarkable as a break in continuity. The election of a minority Liberal government under the leadership of Colin Barnett was the first victory for the conservative side of politics in any Australian state or territory election since February 1998. However, from a local perspective, the defeat of a government approaching eight years in office seems like business as usual. Since John Tonkin’s tenuous one-term Labor government was defeated in 1974, changes of government have occurred with impressive regularity — in 1983, 1993, 2001 and now 2008. The record of the four governments over this period suggests the introduction of four-year terms in 1989 reduced the natural life-span of a Western Australian government from three terms of three years to two terms of four. In this case, the government’s period in office was truncated to seven-and-half years by Premier Alan Carpenter’s highly contentious decision to call the election six months early. Western Australia’s distinctiveness was further demonstrated by the central role assumed during and after the election campaign by a staunchly independent National Party. Not for the first time the party had found itself pondering its future at the national level in the wake of a federal election defeat. Advocates of a merger with the Liberals had achieved a breakthrough in July 2008 with the foundation of the Liberal National Party in Queensland.
    [Show full text]
  • Fighting for the Forests
    Fighting for the Forests A History of The Western Australian Forest Protest Movement 1895-2001 Ron Chapman BA (Hons) This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Murdoch University 2008 Declaration I declare that this thesis is my own account of my research and contains as its main content work which has not previously been submitted for a degree at any tertiary education institution. Ron Chapman Abstract This thesis complements and extends Hutton and Connors' research on forest protest contained in their study of the Australian environment movement. As the first comprehensive study of Western Australian forest protest the thesis analyses the protest movement's organisation, campaigns and strategies. Its central argument is that the contemporary Western Australian native forest protest movement established a network of urban and south-west activist groups which encouraged broad public support, and that a diversity of protest strategies focused public attention on forest issues and pressured the state government to change its forest policies. The thesis identifies two distinct periods of protest activity in Western Australia. During a first period of protest from the 1890s, conservationists used non-confrontational strategies to campaign for the protection of areas of native bushland, and the formation of Western Australia's first nature conservation groups in the early twentieth century laid the foundations for a contemporary forest protest movement. A second period of protest from the mid-1950s comprised five evolutionary
    [Show full text]
  • Political Chronicles Commonwealth of Australia
    Australian Journal of Politics and History: Volume 51, Number 4, 2005, pp. 578-627. Political Chronicles Commonwealth of Australia January to June 2005 JOHN WANNA The Australian National University and Griffith University Latham’s Sudden Exit: a Political Victim of the Tsunami Federal Labor was shell-shocked at the outcome of the 2004 election, and remained so for months. Its courageous gamble with the new leader, Mark Latham, had not paid off. He was not sufficiently marketable to the electorate and had spectacularly self- imploded during the six-week campaign (or, alternatively, been out-manoeuvred by the Prime Minister John Howard). Latham was openly spoken about as “damaged goods” by his own side of politics. Instead of “hanging onto his every word” many supporters were now analysing his off-the-cuff remarks to see whether they made sense or would damage the party. More worrying for Labor was that it had lost ground at the election (losing a net of five seats) making the task of winning in 2007 even more unlikely. With Labor’s primary vote standing at 37.6 per cent and its two-party preferred vote at 47.2 per cent, demoralisation was pronounced. In the opinion polls, Labor fell further behind the Coalition following the election — down to 45 per cent to the Coalition’s 55 per cent on a two-party preferred basis in December, and 46 per cent to 54 per cent in February (Australian, 8 February 2005). While Howard sat on a satisfaction rating over 60 per cent, Latham’s own popularity dived from 54 per cent before the election to 34 per cent over Christmas and January.
    [Show full text]