DOCSLIB.ORG

DSM-IV and DSM-5 Criteria for the Personality Disorders

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DSM-IV and DSM-5 Criteria for the Personality Disorders © 2012 American Psychiatric Association. All Rights Reserved. See Terms & Conditions of Use for more information. DSM-IV and DSM-5 Criteria for the Personality Disorders General Criteria for a Personality Disorder General Criteria for a Personality Disorder DSM-IV DSM-5 Criteria - Revised June 2011 The essential features of a personality disorder are impairments in personality (self and interpersonal) functioning and the presence of pathological personality traits. To diagnose a personality disorder, the following criteria must be met: A. An enduring pattern of inner experience and behavior the deviates A. Significant impairments in self (identity or self-direction) and markedly from the expectations of the individual's culture. This interpersonal (empathy or intimacy) functioning. pattern is manifested in two (or more) of the following areas: 1. Cognition (i.e., ways of perceiving and interpreting self, other people and events) 2. Affectivity (i.e., the range, intensity, liability, and appropriateness of emotional response) 3. Interpersonal functioning 4. Impulse control B. One or more pathological personality trait domains or trait facets. B. The enduring pattern is inflexible and pervasive across a broad range of personal and social situations. C. The impairments in personality functioning and the individual‟s C. The enduring pattern leads to clinically significant distress or personality trait expression are relatively stable across time and impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of consistent across situations. functioning. D. The impairments in personality functioning and the individual‟s D. The pattern is stable and of long duration, and its onset can be personality trait expression are not better understood as traced back at least to adolescence or early adulthood. normative for the individual‟s developmental stage or socio- cultural environment. E. The enduring pattern is not better accounted for as a manifestation or consequence of another mental disorder. E. The impairments in personality functioning and the individual‟s personality trait expression are not solely due to the direct F. The enduring pattern is not due to the direct physiological effects physiological effects of a substance (e.g., a drug of abuse, of a substance (e.g., a drug abuse, a medication) or a general medication) or a general medical condition (e.g., severe head medical condition (e.g., head trauma). trauma). © 2012 American Psychiatric Association. All Rights Reserved. See Terms & Conditions of Use for more information. DSM-IV and DSM-5 Criteria for the Personality Disorders Antisocial Personality Disorder Antisocial Personality Disorder DSM-IV Criteria DSM-5 Criteria - Revised April 2012 The essential features of a personality disorder are impairments in personality (self and interpersonal) functioning and the presence of pathological personality traits. To diagnose antisocial personality disorder, the following criteria must be met: A. There is a pervasive pattern of disregard for and violation of the A. Significant impairments in personality functioning manifest by: rights of others occurring since age 15 years, as indicated by three (or more) of the following: having hurt, mistreated, or stolen from 1. Impairments in self functioning (a or b): another. 1. Failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful a. Identity: Ego-centrism; self-esteem derived from behaviors as indicated by repeatedly performing acts that personal gain, power, or pleasure. are grounds for arrest. b. Self-direction: Goal-setting based on personal gratification; absence of prosocial internal 2. Deceitfulness, as indicated by repeated lying, use of aliases, standards associated with failure to conform to or conning others for personal profit or pleasure. lawful or culturally normative ethical behavior. AND 3. Impulsivity or failure to plan ahead. 2. Impairments in interpersonal functioning (a or b): 4. Irritability and aggressiveness, as indicated by repeated physical fights or assaults. a. Empathy: Lack of concern for feelings, needs, or suffering of others; lack of remorse after hurting or 5. Reckless disregard for safety of self or others. mistreating another. 6. Consistent irresponsibility, as indicated by repeated failure b. Intimacy: Incapacity for mutually intimate to sustain consistent work behavior or honor financial relationships, as exploitation is a primary means of obligations. relating to others, including by deceit and coercion; use of dominance or intimidation to control others. 7. Lack of remorse, as indicated by being indifferent to or rationalizing. © 2012 American Psychiatric Association. All Rights Reserved. See Terms & Conditions of Use for more information. DSM-IV and DSM-5 Criteria for the Personality Disorders B. The individual is at least age 18 years. B. Pathological personality traits in the following domains: 1. Antagonism, characterized by: C. There is evidence of Conduct Disorder with onset before age 15 years. a. Manipulativeness: Frequent use of subterfuge to influence or control others; use of seduction, D. The occurrence of antisocial behavior is not exclusively during the charm, glibness, or ingratiation to achieve one„s course of Schizophrenia or a Manic Episode. ends. b. Deceitfulness: Dishonesty and fraudulence; misrepresentation of self; embellishment or fabrication when relating events. c. Callousness: Lack of concern for feelings or problems of others; lack of guilt or remorse about the negative or harmful effects of one„s actions on others; aggression; sadism. d. Hostility: Persistent or frequent angry feelings; anger or irritability in response to minor slights and insults; mean, nasty, or vengeful behavior. 2. Disinhibition, characterized by: a. Irresponsibility: Disregard for – and failure to honor – financial and other obligations or commitments; lack of respect for – and lack of follow through on – agreements and promises. b. Impulsivity: Acting on the spur of the moment in response to immediate stimuli; acting on a momentary basis without a plan or consideration of outcomes; difficulty establishing and following plans. c. Risk taking: Engagement in dangerous, risky, and potentially self-damaging activities, unnecessarily and without regard for consequences; boredom proneness and thoughtless initiation of activities to © 2012 American Psychiatric Association. All Rights Reserved. See Terms & Conditions of Use for more information. DSM-IV and DSM-5 Criteria for the Personality Disorders counter boredom; lack of concern for one„s limitations and denial of the reality of personal danger C. The impairments in personality functioning and the individual‟s personality trait expression are relatively stable across time and consistent across situations. D. The impairments in personality functioning and the individual‟s personality trait expression are not better understood as normative for the individual‟s developmental stage or socio- cultural environment. E. The impairments in personality functioning and the individual‟s personality trait expression are not solely due to the direct physiological effects of a substance (e.g., a drug of abuse, medication) or a general medical condition (e.g., severe head trauma). F. The individual is at least age 18 years. Avoidant Personality Disorder Avoidant Personality Disorder DSM-IV Criteria DSM-5 Criteria - Revised June 2011 The essential features of a personality disorder are impairments in personality (self and interpersonal) functioning and the presence of pathological personality traits. To diagnose avoidant personality disorder, the following criteria must be met: A. A pervasive pattern of social inhibition, feelings of inadequacy, and A. Significant impairments in personality functioning manifest by: hypersensitivity to negative evaluation, beginning by early adulthood 1. Impairments in self functioning (a or b): and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by four (or more) of a. Identity: Low self-esteem associated with self-appraisal the following: socially inept, personally unappealing, or inferior; excessive feelings of shame or inadequacy. © 2012 American Psychiatric Association. All Rights Reserved. See Terms & Conditions of Use for more information. DSM-IV and DSM-5 Criteria for the Personality Disorders 1. Avoids occupational activities that involve significant b. Self-direction: Unrealistic standards for behavior interpersonal contact, because of fears of criticism, disapproval, associated with reluctance to pursue goals, take personal or rejection. risks, or engage in new activities involving interpersonal contact. 2. Is unwilling to get involved with people unless certain of being liked. AND 3. Shows restraint within intimate relationships because of the fear 2. Impairments in interpersonal functioning (a or b): of being shamed or ridiculed. a. Empathy: Preoccupation with, and sensitivity to, criticism or rejection, associated with distorted inference of others‟ 4. Is preoccupied with being criticized or rejected in social perspectives as negative. situations. b. Intimacy: Reluctance to get involved with people unless 5. Is inhibited in new interpersonal situations because of feelings of being certain of being liked; diminished mutuality within inadequacy. intimate relationships because of fear of being shamed or ridiculed. 6. Views self as socially inept, personally unappealing, or inferior to others. B. Pathological personality traits in the following domains: 1. Detachment, characterized by: 7. Is unusually reluctant to take
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Self-Presentation Tactics in Social Media Han-Yun HUANG
    2014 International Conference on Social Science (ICSS 2014) Self-presentation Tactics in Social Media Han-Yun HUANG School of Journalism and Communication, Xiamen University, Fujian, China. Keywords: Self-presentation, Social Media, Adolescents Abstract. Social media now are very popular. Many people use them everywhere through mobile phones. One of the most important motives people using social media is for self-presentation. This study focuses on discussing the self-presentation tactics adolescents use in social media. The results show that adolescents mainly use four self-presentation tactics in social media, namely, self-promotion, ingratiation, manipulation and damage control. These four self-presentation tactics will be discussed in details. Introduction Social media are applications that enable people to interact with each other and build social networks that increase social capital (Barnes, 2008). Kaplan and Haenlein (2010) defined social media more theoretically as “a group of Internet-based applications that build on the ideological and technological foundations of Web 2.0, which allow the creation and exchange of user-generated content” (p. 64). Spannerworks (2007) gave a similar working definition of social media as new kinds of online media that share most or all of the characteristics of participation, openness, conversation, community and connectedness. Comm (2010) suggested that the “social” part of social media means that “publishing is now about participation” (Comm, 2010, p. 3). Those who use social media sufficiently create not only content, but also conversations, and those conversations combine further to create communities (Comm, 2010). Results from focus groups among adolescents in urban China indicated that IM, SNS, blogs, and microblogs were their four most widely used social media.
    [Show full text]
  • Borderline Personality Disorder
    Borderline Personality Disorder What is Borderline Personality Disorder? Borderline personality disorder is an illness marked by an ongoing pattern of varying moods, self-image, and behavior. These symptoms often result in impulsive actions and problems in relationships with other people. A person with borderline personality disorder may experience episodes of anger, depression, and anxiety that may last from a few hours to days. Recognizable symptoms typically show up during adolescence (teenage years) or early adulthood, but early symptoms of the illness can occur during childhood. National Institute of Mental Health What are the signs People with borderline personality disorder may and symptoms? experience mood swings and may display uncertainty about how they see themselves and their role in the world. As a result, their interests and values can change quickly. People with borderline personality disorder also tend to view things in extremes, such as all good or all bad. Their opinions of other people can also change quickly. An individual who is seen as a friend one day may be considered an enemy or traitor the next. These shifting feelings can lead to intense and unstable relationships. Other signs or symptoms may include: ♦ Efforts to avoid real or imagined abandonment, such as rapidly initiating intimate (physical or emotional) relationships or cutting off communication with someone in anticipation of being abandoned ♦ A pattern of intense and unstable relationships with family, friends, and loved ones, often swinging from extreme closeness and love (idealization) to extreme dislike or anger (devaluation) ♦ Distorted and unstable self-image or sense of self ♦ Impulsive and often dangerous behaviors, such as spending sprees, unsafe sex, substance abuse, reckless driving, and binge eating.
    [Show full text]
  • What Can Be Learned from White Matter Alterations in Antisocial Girls Willeke M
    Menks WM, Raschle NM. J Neurol Neuromedicine (2017) 2(7): 16-20 Neuromedicine www.jneurology.com www.jneurology.com Journal of Neurology & Neuromedicine Mini Review Open Access What can be learned from white matter alterations in antisocial girls Willeke M. Menks1, Christina Stadler1 and Nora M. Raschle1 1Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Basel, Psychiatric University Hospital Basel, Switzerland. Article Info ABSTRACT Article Notes Antisocial behavior in youths constitutes a major public health problem Received: June 17, 2017 worldwide. Conduct disorder is a severe variant of antisocial behavior with higher Accepted: July 31, 2017 prevalence rates for boys (12%) as opposed to girls (7%). A better understanding *Correspondence: of the underlying neurobiological mechanisms of conduct disorder is warranted Dr. Willeke Menks, PhD to improve identification, diagnosis, or treatment. Functional and structural Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (KJPK), neuroimaging studies have indicated several key brain regions within the limbic Psychiatric University Clinics Basel (UPK) system and prefrontal cortex that are altered in youths with conduct disorder. Schanzenstrasse 13, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland Examining the structural connectivity, i.e. white matter fiber tracts connecting Tel. +41 61 265 89 76 these brain areas, may further inform about the underlying neural mechanisms. Fax +41 61 265 89 61 Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is a non-invasive technique that can evaluate the © 2017 Menks WM & Raschle NM. This article is distributed white matter integrity of fiber tracts throughout the brain. To date, DTI studies have under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 found several white matter tracts that are altered in youths with conduct disorder.
    [Show full text]
  • Tactics of Impression Management: Relative Success on Workplace Relationship Dr Rajeshwari Gwal1 ABSTRACT
    The International Journal of Indian Psychology ISSN 2348-5396 (e) | ISSN: 2349-3429 (p) Volume 2, Issue 2, Paper ID: B00362V2I22015 http://www.ijip.in | January to March 2015 Tactics of Impression Management: Relative Success on Workplace Relationship Dr Rajeshwari Gwal1 ABSTRACT: Impression Management, the process by which people control the impressions others form of them, plays an important role in inter-personal behavior. All kinds of organizations consist of individuals with variety of personal characteristics; therefore those are important to manage them effectively. Identifying the behavior manner of each of these personal characteristics, interactions among them and interpersonal relations are on the basis of the impressions given and taken. Understanding one of the important determinants of individual’s social relations helps to get a broader insight of human beings. Employees try to sculpture their relationships in organizational settings as well. Impression management turns out to be a continuous activity among newcomers, used in order to be accepted by the organization, and among those who have matured with the organization, used in order to be influential (Demir, 2002). Keywords: Impression Management, Self Promotion, Ingratiation, Exemplification, Intimidation, Supplication INTRODUCTION: When two individuals or parties meet, both form a judgment about each other. Impression Management theorists believe that it is a primary human motive; both inside and outside the organization (Provis,2010) to avoid being evaluated negatively (Jain,2012). Goffman (1959) initially started with the study of impression management by introducing a framework describing the way one presents them and how others might perceive that presentation (Cole, Rozelle, 2011). The first party consciously chooses a behavior to present to the second party in anticipation of a desired effect.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychotic Symptoms in Adolescents with Borderline Personality Disorder Features
    European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-018-1257-2 ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION Psychotic symptoms in adolescents with borderline personality disorder features Katherine N. Thompson1,2 · Marialuisa Cavelti1,2,4 · Andrew M. Chanen1,2,3 Received: 23 April 2018 / Accepted: 14 November 2018 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Psychotic symptoms have been found to be relatively common among adults with borderline personality disorder (BPD), and to be a marker of BPD severity, but are not recognised in daily clinical practice in these patients. This study is the frst to examine the prevalence of psychotic symptoms in 15–18-year olds with BPD features. It was hypothesised that adoles- cents with full-threshold BPD would have signifcantly more psychotic symptoms than adolescents with sub-threshold BPD features, and that both these groups would have signifcantly more psychotic symptoms than adolescents with no BPD features. A total of 171 psychiatric outpatients, aged 15–18 years, were assessed using a structured interview for DSM-IV personality disorder and categorised into three groups: no BPD features (n = 48), sub-threshold BPD features (n = 80), and full-threshold BPD (n = 43). The groups were compared on measures of psychopathology and functioning (e.g. Youth Self Report, Symptom Check List-90-R, SOFAS). Adolescents with full-threshold BPD reported more psychotic symptoms than the sub-threshold BPD group (p < .001), and both these groups reported more psychotic symptoms than those with no BPD features (p < .001). Adolescents with full-threshold BPD reported more confusion (p < .01), paranoia (p < .001), visual hallucinations (p < .001) and strange thoughts (p < .01), than the other two groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding the Golden Mean: the Overuse, Underuse, and Optimal Use of Character Strengths
    Counselling Psychology Quarterly ISSN: 0951-5070 (Print) 1469-3674 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ccpq20 Finding the golden mean: the overuse, underuse, and optimal use of character strengths Ryan M. Niemiec To cite this article: Ryan M. Niemiec (2019): Finding the golden mean: the overuse, underuse, and optimal use of character strengths, Counselling Psychology Quarterly, DOI: 10.1080/09515070.2019.1617674 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2019.1617674 Published online: 20 May 2019. Submit your article to this journal View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ccpq20 COUNSELLING PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2019.1617674 ARTICLE Finding the golden mean: the overuse, underuse, and optimal use of character strengths Ryan M. Niemiec VIA Institute on Character, Cincinnati, OH, USA ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY The science of well-being has catalyzed a tremendous amount of Received 28 February 2019 research with no area more robust in application and impact than Accepted 8 May 2019 the science of character strengths. As the empirical links between KEYWORDS character strengths and positive outcomes rapidly grow, the research Character strengths; around strength imbalances and the use of strengths with problems strengths overuse; strengths and conflicts is nascent. The use of character strengths in understand- underuse; optimal use; ing and handling life suffering as well as emerging from it, is particularly second wave positive aligned within second wave positive psychology. Areas of particular psychology; golden mean promise include strengths overuse and strengths underuse, alongside its companion of strengths optimaluse.Thelatterisviewedasthe golden mean of character strengths which refers to the expression of the right combination of strengths, to the right degree, and in the right situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Parallel Syndromes: Two Dimensions of Narcissism and the Facets of Psychopathic Personality in Criminally Involved Individuals
    Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment © 2011 American Psychological Association 2011, Vol. 2, No. 2, 113–127 1949-2715/11/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/a0021870 Parallel Syndromes: Two Dimensions of Narcissism and the Facets of Psychopathic Personality in Criminally Involved Individuals Michelle Schoenleber, Naomi Sadeh, and Edelyn Verona University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign Little research has examined different dimensions of narcissism that may parallel psychopathy facets in criminally involved individuals. In this study, we examined the pattern of relationships between grandiose and vulnerable narcissism, assessed using the Narcissistic Personality Inventory–16 and the Hypersensitive Narcissism Scale, respec- tively, and the four facets of psychopathy (interpersonal, affective, lifestyle, and antisocial) assessed via the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version. As predicted, grandiose and vulnerable narcissism showed differential relationships to psychopathy facets, with gran- diose narcissism relating positively to the interpersonal facet of psychopathy and vulnerable narcissism relating positively to the lifestyle facet of psychopathy. Paralleling existing psychopathy research, vulnerable narcissism showed stronger associations than grandiose narcissism to (a) other forms of psychopathology, including internalizing and substance use disorders, and (b) self- and other-directed aggression, measured with the Life History of Aggression and the Forms of Aggression Questionnaire. Grandiose narcissism was none- theless associated
    [Show full text]
  • Definitions of Child Abuse and Neglect
    STATE STATUTES Current Through March 2019 WHAT’S INSIDE Defining child abuse or Definitions of Child neglect in State law Abuse and Neglect Standards for reporting Child abuse and neglect are defined by Federal Persons responsible for the child and State laws. At the State level, child abuse and neglect may be defined in both civil and criminal Exceptions statutes. This publication presents civil definitions that determine the grounds for intervention by Summaries of State laws State child protective agencies.1 At the Federal level, the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment To find statute information for a Act (CAPTA) has defined child abuse and neglect particular State, as "any recent act or failure to act on the part go to of a parent or caregiver that results in death, https://www.childwelfare. serious physical or emotional harm, sexual abuse, gov/topics/systemwide/ or exploitation, or an act or failure to act that laws-policies/state/. presents an imminent risk of serious harm."2 1 States also may define child abuse and neglect in criminal statutes. These definitions provide the grounds for the arrest and prosecution of the offenders. 2 CAPTA Reauthorization Act of 2010 (P.L. 111-320), 42 U.S.C. § 5101, Note (§ 3). Children’s Bureau/ACYF/ACF/HHS 800.394.3366 | Email: [email protected] | https://www.childwelfare.gov Definitions of Child Abuse and Neglect https://www.childwelfare.gov CAPTA defines sexual abuse as follows: and neglect in statute.5 States recognize the different types of abuse in their definitions, including physical abuse, The employment, use, persuasion, inducement, neglect, sexual abuse, and emotional abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • Motor, Emotional and Cognitive Empathic Abilities in Children with Autism and Conduct Disorder Danielle M.A
    Motor, Emotional and Cognitive Empathic Abilities in Children with Autism and Conduct Disorder Danielle M.A. Bons1,2 Floor E. Scheepers1 [email protected] [email protected] +31 (0)488 – 469 611 Nanda N.J. Rommelse1,2 Jan K. Buitelaar1,2 [email protected] [email protected] +31 (0)24 351 2222 1Karakter child- and adolescent psychiatry 2Department of Psychiatry UMC St. Radboud University Centre Nijmegen, Zetten-Tiel P.O. Box 9101, 6500HB Nijmegen, The P.O. Box 104, 6670AC Zetten, The Netherlands Netherlands ABSTRACT repetitive patterns of behavior, interests and activities. This paper gives an overview of the studies that Children with conduct disorder (CD) show a pattern of investigated motor, emotional and cognitive empathy in behavior violating the basic rights of others and age- juveniles with autism or conduct disorder. Studies that appropriate norms and rules, which may develop in measured response to emotional faces with use of facial antisocial behavior in adulthood. At first sight these EMG, ECG, skin conductance, eye-tracking or emotion disorders appear to have little in common. However, lack of recognition are discussed. In autism facial mimicry and empathy is a core symptom in both ASD and CD. emotion recognition, as well as attention to the eyes, seem to be reduced. In conduct disorder facial mi micry seems to Empathy is assumed to consist out of three components: be impaired as well as recognition of fear and sad facial motor, emotional and cognitive empathy [5]. Motor expressions, and possibly associated with lack of attention empathy refers to unconsciously mirroring the facial to the eyes.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaslighting, Misogyny, and Psychological Oppression Cynthia A
    The Monist, 2019, 102, 221–235 doi: 10.1093/monist/onz007 Article Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/monist/article-abstract/102/2/221/5374582 by University of Utah user on 11 March 2019 Gaslighting, Misogyny, and Psychological Oppression Cynthia A. Stark* ABSTRACT This paper develops a notion of manipulative gaslighting, which is designed to capture something not captured by epistemic gaslighting, namely the intent to undermine women by denying their testimony about harms done to them by men. Manipulative gaslighting, I propose, consists in getting someone to doubt her testimony by challeng- ing its credibility using two tactics: “sidestepping” (dodging evidence that supports her testimony) and “displacing” (attributing to her cognitive or characterological defects). I explain how manipulative gaslighting is distinct from (mere) reasonable disagree- ment, with which it is sometimes confused. I also argue for three further claims: that manipulative gaslighting is a method of enacting misogyny, that it is often a collective phenomenon, and, as collective, qualifies as a mode of psychological oppression. The term “gaslighting” has recently entered the philosophical lexicon. The literature on gaslighting has two strands. In one, gaslighting is characterized as a form of testi- monial injustice. As such, it is a distinctively epistemic injustice that wrongs persons primarily as knowers.1 Gaslighting occurs when someone denies, on the basis of another’s social identity, her testimony about a harm or wrong done to her.2 In the other strand, gaslighting is described as a form of wrongful manipulation and, indeed, a form of emotional abuse. This use follows the use of “gaslighting” in therapeutic practice.3 On this account, the aim of gaslighting is to get another to see her own plausible perceptions, beliefs, or memories as groundless.4 In what follows, I develop a notion of manipulative gaslighting, which I believe is necessary to capture a social phenomenon not accounted for by epistemic gaslight- ing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emotional Content of Sexual Fantasies, Psychological and Interpersonal Distress, and Satisfaction in Romantic Relationships
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 9-2017 Women’s Sexual Fantasies in Context: The Emotional Content of Sexual Fantasies, Psychological and Interpersonal Distress, and Satisfaction in Romantic Relationships Sarah Constantine The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/2162 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] i Women’s Sexual Fantasies in Context: The Emotional Content of Sexual Fantasies, Psychological and Interpersonal Distress, and Satisfaction in Romantic Relationships By Sarah Constantine A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Psychology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2017 ii © 2017 SARAH CONSTANTINE All Rights Reserved iii Women’s Sexual Fantasies in Context: The Emotional Content of Sexual Fantasies, Psychological and Interpersonal Distress, and Satisfaction in Romantic Relationships By Sarah Constantine This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Psychology in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. May 16th, 2017 Margaret Rosario ___________________________________________ Chair of Examining Committee Richard Bodnar ___________________________________________ Executive Officer Supervisory Committee Diana Diamond Lissa Weinstein Diana Puñales Steven Tuber THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iv Abstract Women’s Sexual Fantasies in Context: The Emotional Content of Sexual Fantasies, Psychological and Interpersonal Distress, and Satisfaction in Romantic Relationships by Sarah Constantine The Graduate Center and City College, City University of New York Adviser: Margaret Rosario, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Running Heading: NARCISSISM and INTERPERSONAL SITUATIONS
    Running Heading: NARCISSISM AND INTERPERSONAL SITUATIONS Grandiose and Vulnerable Narcissistic States in Interpersonal Situations Elizabeth A. Edershile Aidan G.C. Wright University of Pittsburgh This manuscript is currently under review, and therefore should not be treated as the final report. The authors would appreciate critical feedback and suggestions for how to improve the study or its writeup. Word Count: 5,356 Aidan Wright’s effort on this project was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (L30 MH101760). The opinions expressed are solely those of the authors and not those of the funding source. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Elizabeth Edershile, Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, 3213 Sennott Square, 210 S. Bouquet St., Pittsburgh, PA, 15260. E-mail: [email protected] NARCISSISM AND INTERPERSONAL SITUATIONS Abstract Clinicians have noted that narcissistic individuals fluctuate over time in their levels of grandiosity and vulnerability. However, these fluctuations remain poorly understood from an empirical perspective. Interpersonal theory asserts that interpersonal situations are central to the expression of personality and psychopathology, and therefore are a key context in which to understand state narcissism’s dynamic processes. The present study is the first to examine state narcissism assessed during interpersonal situations. Specifically, perceptions of others’ warmth and dominance, momentary grandiosity and vulnerability, and one’s own warm and dominant behavior were assessed across situations in daily life in a large sample (person N=286; occasion N=6,837). Results revealed that more grandiose individuals perceived others as colder and behaved in a more dominant and cold fashion, on average. But in the moment, relatively higher grandiosity was associated with perceiving others as warmer and more submissive and resulted in more dominant and warm behavior.
    [Show full text]