DOCSLIB.ORG

Biosecurity Plan for the Onion Industry 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biosecurity Plan for the Onion Industry 2018 PLANT HEALTH AUSTRALIA | Biosecurity Plan for the Onion Industry 2018 BIOSECURITY PLAN FOR THE ONION INDUSTRY October 2018, Version 3.1 | PAGE 1 PLANT HEALTH AUSTRALIA | Biosecurity Plan for the Onion Industry 2018 Location: Level 1 1 Phipps Close DEAKIN ACT 2600 Phone: +61 2 6215 7700 Fax: +61 2 6260 4321 E-mail: biosecurity@phau.com.au Visit our web site: www.planthealthaustralia.com.au An electronic copy of this plan is available through the email address listed above. © Plant Health Australia Limited 2018 Copyright in this publication is owned by Plant Health Australia Limited, except when content has been provided by other contributors, in which case copyright may be owned by another person. With the exception of any material protected by a trade mark, this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. Any use of this publication, other than as authorised under this licence or copyright law, is prohibited. creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ - This detail the relevant licence conditions, including the full legal code. This licence allows for non-commercial redistribution, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to Plant Health Australia (as below). In referencing this document, the preferred citation is: Plant Health Australia Ltd (2018) Biosecurity Plan for the Onion Industry (Version 3.1 – 2018) Plant Health Australia, Canberra, ACT. This project has been funded by Hort Innovation, using the onion research and development levy and contributions from the Australian Government. Hort Innovation is the grower-owned, not for profit research and development corporation for Australian horticulture Disclaimer: The material contained in this publication is produced for general information only. It is not intended as professional advice on any particular matter. No person should act or fail to act on the basis of any material contained in this publication without first obtaining specific and independent professional advice. Plant Health Australia and all persons acting for Plant Health Australia in preparing this publication, expressly disclaim all and any liability to any persons in respect of anything done by any such person in reliance, whether in whole or in part, on this publication. The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of Plant Health Australia. | PAGE 2 PLANT HEALTH AUSTRALIA | Biosecurity Plan for the Onion Industry 2018 Acknowledgements The Biosecurity Plan for the Onion Industry was coordinated by Plant Health Australia and developed through a partnership approach with government and industry. The following organisations and agencies were involved in the development and finalisation of the plan: | PAGE 3 PLANT HEALTH AUSTRALIA | Biosecurity Plan for the Onion Industry 2018 Endorsement The Biosecurity Plan for the Onion Industry (Version 3.0) was formally endorsed by the Onion industry (through Onions Australia) in November 2017, and all state and territory governments (through the Plant Health Committee) in October 2018. The Australian Government endorses the document without prejudice for the purposes of industry’s planning needs and meeting the Department’s obligations under Clause 13 of the EPPRD. In providing this endorsement the Department notes page 61 of the Plan which states: “This Document considers all potential pathways by which a pest might enter Australia, including natural and assisted spread (including smuggling). This is a broader view of potential risk than the IRA conducted by the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment which focus only on specific regulated import pathways.” Reporting suspect pests Any unusual plant pest should be reported immediately to the relevant state/territory agriculture department through the Exotic Plant Pest Hotline (1800 084 881). Early reporting enhances the chance of effective control and eradication. | PAGE 4 PLANT HEALTH AUSTRALIA | Biosecurity Plan for the Onion Industry 2018 Table of contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... 11 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... 12 SIGNIFICANT BIOSECURITY THREATS............................................................................ 14 Document overview .......................................................................................................... 15 High priority exotic pests, established pests and weeds of biosecurity significance ......... 15 Implementing biosecurity for the Australian Onion Industry 2017-2022 ........................... 15 Threat identification and pest risk assessments ............................................................. 16 Risk mitigation and preparedness .................................................................................. 16 Response management ................................................................................................. 16 Pests and Weeds of Biosecurity Significance Overview .................................................... 18 Onion industry high priority exotic pests ......................................................................... 19 Established pests of biosecurity significance .................................................................. 22 Established weeds of biosecurity significance ................................................................ 25 Implementing biosecurity for the Australian onion industry 2017-2022 ............................... 28 Australian Onion industry - biosecurity preparedness ..................................................... 43 Onions Australia industry biosecurity statement ............................................................. 47 NATIONAL BIOSECURITY SYSTEM .................................................................................. 48 What is biosecurity and why is it important? ...................................................................... 49 The plant biosecurity system in Australia .......................................................................... 49 Onion Peak Industry Body ............................................................................................. 50 Plant Health Australia .................................................................................................... 51 The Biosecurity Plan ......................................................................................................... 51 Biosecurity planning....................................................................................................... 52 Biosecurity Plan development ........................................................................................ 52 Review processes ......................................................................................................... 55 THREAT IDENTIFICATION AND PEST RISK ASSESSMENTS .......................................... 57 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 58 Exotic pests of the onion industry ...................................................................................... 59 Threat identification ....................................................................................................... 59 Pest risk assessments ................................................................................................... 59 Ranking pest threats ...................................................................................................... 61 Description of terms used in pest risk tables .................................................................. 62 RISK MITIGATION AND PREPAREDNESS ........................................................................ 65 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 66 Barrier quarantine ............................................................................................................. 67 National level – importation restrictions .......................................................................... 67 State and regional level – movement restrictions............................................................ 69 Farm level – exclusion activities ..................................................................................... 74 Surveillance ...................................................................................................................... 74 National surveillance programs ...................................................................................... 75 State surveillance programs ........................................................................................... 76 Farm surveillance activities ............................................................................................ 77 | PAGE 5 PLANT HEALTH AUSTRALIA | Biosecurity Plan for the Onion Industry 2018 Training ............................................................................................................................ 79 National EPP Training Program ..................................................................................... 79 Awareness ....................................................................................................................... 79 High priority plant pest threat-related documents...........................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Biosecurity Plan for the Vegetable Industry
    Biosecurity Plan for the Vegetable Industry A shared responsibility between government and industry Version 3.0 May 2018 Plant Health AUSTRALIA Location: Level 1 1 Phipps Close DEAKIN ACT 2600 Phone: +61 2 6215 7700 Fax: +61 2 6260 4321 E-mail: biosecurity@phau.com.au Visit our web site: www.planthealthaustralia.com.au An electronic copy of this plan is available through the email address listed above. © Plant Health Australia Limited 2018 Copyright in this publication is owned by Plant Health Australia Limited, except when content has been provided by other contributors, in which case copyright may be owned by another person. With the exception of any material protected by a trade mark, this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivs 3.0 Australia licence. Any use of this publication, other than as authorised under this licence or copyright law, is prohibited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ - This details the relevant licence conditions, including the full legal code. This licence allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to Plant Health Australia (as below). In referencing this document, the preferred citation is: Plant Health Australia Ltd (2018) Biosecurity Plan for the Vegetable Industry (Version 3.0 – 2018) Plant Health Australia, Canberra, ACT. This project has been funded by Hort Innovation, using the vegetable research and development levy and contributions from the Australian Government. Hort Innovation is the grower-owned, not for profit research and development corporation for Australian horticulture Disclaimer: The material contained in this publication is produced for general information only.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Eleven Plant Species As Potential Banker Plants to Support Predatory Orius Sauteri in Tea Plant Systems
    insects Article Evaluation of Eleven Plant Species as Potential Banker Plants to Support Predatory Orius sauteri in Tea Plant Systems Ruifang Zhang, Dezhong Ji, Qiuqiu Zhang and Linhong Jin * State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Green Pesticide and Agricultural Bioengineering, Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide and Agricultural Bioengineering, Ministry of Education, Guizhou University, Huaxi District, Guiyang 550025, China; gs.rfzhang16@gzu.edu.cn (R.Z.); gs.dzji19@gzu.edu.cn (D.J.); gs.zhangqq18@gzu.edu.cn (Q.Z.) * Correspondence: lhjin@gzu.edu.cn; Tel.: +186-8517-4719 Simple Summary: The tea plant is an economically significant beverage crop globally, especially in China. However, tea green leafhoppers and thrips are key pests in Asian tea production systems, causing serious damage to its yield and quality. With growing concerns about pesticide residues on tea and their adverse effects on natural enemies of tea pests, biological pest control is gaining more importance in tea plantations. Orius sauteri is a polyphagous predator used as a biological control agent. Here, we reported 11 plants as banker plants to support the predatory Orius sauteri in tea plant systems. Among them, white clover, red bean, mung bean, peanut, soybean, kidney bean, bush vetch, smooth vetch, and common vetch were found suitable; red bean performed relatively better than the others. Abstract: Tea green leafhoppers and thrips are key pests in tea plantations and have widely invaded those of Asian origin. Pesticides are currently a favorable control method but not desirable for frequent use on tea plants. To meet Integrated Pest Management (IPM) demand, biological control Citation: Zhang, R.; Ji, D.; Zhang, Q.; with a natural enemy is viewed as the most promising way.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA § 319.56–2H
    Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA § 319.56–2h pest conditions on arrival or to assure fect that such garlic is free of living himself of the effectiveness of the stages of Brachycerus spp. and treatment. Dyspessa ulula (Bkh.), said certifi- (c) The entry of cipollini from Mo- cation to be based on field inspection rocco may be made only through the and certification and subsequent reex- ports of New York and Boston at which amination at the port of departure ports facilities for vacuum fumigation prior to exportation. The with methyl bromide, as herein re- phytosanitary certificate to be issued quired, are available. by such official shall show the ship- [24 FR 10788, Dec. 29, 1959. Redesignated at 50 ment to be either initially free from FR 9788, Mar. 12, 1985] these pests or to have been fumigated. (ii) The original copy of the § 319.56–2f [Reserved] phytosanitary certificate shall be at- tached to the manifest accompanying § 319.56–2g Administrative instruc- the shipment. However, with the con- tions prescribing method of treat- sent of the Plant Quarantine inspector, ment of garlic from specified coun- tries. the importer may arrange to have the original phytosanitary certificate (a) Except as otherwise provided in mailed direct to the Inspector in these administrative instructions, fu- Charge, Plant Protection and Quar- migation with methyl bromide in vacu- antine Programs, at the port of entry, um fumigation chambers, in accord- if this will expedite inspection and re- ance with the Plant Protection and lease of certified shipments. If such an Quarantine Treatment Manual, which arrangement is made, a copy of the is incorporated by reference at § 300.1 of phytosanitary certificate shall be at- this chapter, is a condition of entry tached to the manifest accompanying under permit for all shipments of garlic the shipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Working List of Prairie Restricted (Specialist) Insects in Wisconsin (11/26/2015)
    Working List of Prairie Restricted (Specialist) Insects in Wisconsin (11/26/2015) By Richard Henderson Research Ecologist, WI DNR Bureau of Science Services Summary This is a preliminary list of insects that are either well known, or likely, to be closely associated with Wisconsin’s original native prairie. These species are mostly dependent upon remnants of original prairie, or plantings/restorations of prairie where their hosts have been re-established (see discussion below), and thus are rarely found outside of these settings. The list also includes some species tied to native ecosystems that grade into prairie, such as savannas, sand barrens, fens, sedge meadow, and shallow marsh. The list is annotated with known host(s) of each insect, and the likelihood of its presence in the state (see key at end of list for specifics). This working list is a byproduct of a prairie invertebrate study I coordinated from1995-2005 that covered 6 Midwestern states and included 14 cooperators. The project surveyed insects on prairie remnants and investigated the effects of fire on those insects. It was funded in part by a series of grants from the US Fish and Wildlife Service. So far, the list has 475 species. However, this is a partial list at best, representing approximately only ¼ of the prairie-specialist insects likely present in the region (see discussion below). Significant input to this list is needed, as there are major taxa groups missing or greatly under represented. Such absence is not necessarily due to few or no prairie-specialists in those groups, but due more to lack of knowledge about life histories (at least published knowledge), unsettled taxonomy, and lack of taxonomic specialists currently working in those groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Errata and First Update to the 2010 Checklist of the Lepidoptera Of
    Errata and first uppppdate to the 2010 checklist of the Lepidoptera of Alberta Gregory R. Pohl, Jason J Dombroskie, Jean‐François Landry, Charles D Bird, and Vazrick Nazari lead author contact: gpohl@nrcan.gc.ca Introduction: Since the Annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta was published in March 2010 (Pohl et al. 2010), a few typographical and nomenclatural errors have come to the authors' attention, as well as three erroneous AB records that were inadvertently omitted from that publication. Additionally, a considerable number of new AB species records have been brought to our attention since that checklist went to press. As expected, most are microlepidoptera. We detail all these items below, in what we hope will be a regular series of addenda to the AB list. If you are aware of further errors or additions to the AB Lepidoptera list, please contact the authors. Wit hin the NidNoctuoidea, there are a few minor iiiinconsistencies in the order of species wihiithin genera, and in the order of genera within tribes or subtribes, as compared to the sequence published by Lafontaine & Schmidt (2010). As well, the sequence of tribes in the AB list does not exactly match that of Lafontaine & Schmidt (2010), particularly in the Erebinae. We are not detailing those minor differences here unless they involve a move to a new genus or new higher taxonomic category. Errata: Abstract, p. 2, line 10, should read "1530... annotations are given" 41 Nemapogon granella (p. 55). Add Kearfott (1905) to the AB literature records. 78 Caloptilia syringella (p. 60). This species should be placed in the genus Gracillaria as per De Prins & De Prins (2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Full Page Photo
    Эверсманния. Энтомологические исследования Eversmannia в России и соседних регионах. Вып. 9. 20.III.2007: 11–33 No. 9. 2007. Р. В. Яковлев г. Барнаул, Алтайский государственный университет (Южно-Сибирский ботанический сад), Алтайский краевой институт повышения квалификации работников образования Древоточцы (Lepidoptera: Cossidae) России R.V. Yakovlev. Carpenter moths (Lepidoptera: Cossidae) of Russia. SUMMARY. In this article the catalogue of Cossidae of Russia is presented. An annotated list including 32 species has been compiled. Two new species and two new subspecies: Catopta albonubila argunica, ssp. n. (Locus typicus: East Trasbaicalia, Kuenga, 45 km SW. Sretensk), Catopta perunovi, sp. n. (Locus typicus: Russia, Altai Rep., near Ongudai), Cossus cossus dauricus, ssp. n. (Locus typicus: Russia Transbaikalia, Chita Province, Nizhnii Tsasutchei), Phragmataecia pacifica, sp. n. (Locus typicus: Russia, Dagestan, 5 km E. Urma) are described. Besides, a new species from S. Mongolia Catopta saldaitisi, sp. n. (Locus typicus: S. Mongolia, Omnogovi Aimak, the Gobi Altai Mts., Gurvan Sayhan) is described. For each species bibliography and distribution map are given. Проводимая в последние годы работа по исследованию древоточцев (Сossidae) Евразии при- вела к описанию ряда новых таксонов с территории Палеарктики, позволила установить грани- цы распространения многих видов. В данной работе делается попытка представить полный ка- талог древоточцев России, выполненный как на основании анализа литературных данных, так и на большом фактическом материале. Исследованный материал хранится в ряде коллекций Рос- сии, Украины, Германии, Австрии. Приведен аннотированный список видов, включающий дан- ные о первичном описании, синонимии, месте хранения типового материала и распростране- нии. Для редких и малоизвестных видов и для новых таксонов приводятся полные данные эти- кеток. Для каждого вида приведена карта распространения на территории России.
    [Show full text]
  • Tubulinosema Loxostegi Sp. N. (Microsporidia: Tubulinosematidae) from the Beet Webworm Loxostege Sticticalis L
    Acta Protozool. (2013) 52: 299–308 http://www.eko.uj.edu.pl/ap ACTA doi:10.4467/16890027AP.13.027.1319 PROTOZOOLOGICA Tubulinosema loxostegi sp. n. (Microsporidia: Tubulinosematidae) from the Beet Webworm Loxostege sticticalis L. (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in Western Siberia Julia M. MALYSH1, Yuri S. TOKAREV1, Natalia V. SITNICOVA2, Vyacheslav V. MARTEMYA- NOV3, Andrei N. FROLOV1 and Irma V. ISSI1 1 All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection, St. Petersburg, Pushkin, Russia; 2 Institute of Zoology, Chisinau, Moldova; 3 Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, Novosibirsk, Russia Abstract. Adults of beet webworm Loxostege sticticalis were collected in Western Siberia in 2009 and 2010. A microsporidium was found infecting 12 of 50 moths in 2010. The parasite develops in direct contact with host cell cytoplasm, sporogony is presumably disporoblastic. The spores are ovoid, diplokaryotic, 4.2 × 2.4 µm in size (fresh), without a sporophorous vesicle. Electron microscopy showed: (a) tubules on the surface of sporoblasts and immature spores; (b) slightly anisofilar polar tube with 10–14 coils, last 2–3 coils of lesser electron density; (c) bipartite polaroplast with anterior and posterior parts composed of thin and thick lamellae, respectively; (d) an indentation in the region of the anchoring disc; (e) an additional layer of electron-dense amorphous matter on the exospore surface. The spore ultrastructure is char- acteristic of the genus Tubulinosema. Sequencing of small subunit and large subunit ribosomal RNA genes showed 98–99.6% similarity of this parasite to the Tubulinosema species available on Genbank. A new species Tubulinosema loxostegi sp. n. is established. Key words: Beet webworm, microsporidia, taxonomy, molecular phylogenetics, Tubulinosema.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Insect Species Which May Be Tallgrass Prairie Specialists
    Conservation Biology Research Grants Program Division of Ecological Services © Minnesota Department of Natural Resources List of Insect Species which May Be Tallgrass Prairie Specialists Final Report to the USFWS Cooperating Agencies July 1, 1996 Catherine Reed Entomology Department 219 Hodson Hall University of Minnesota St. Paul MN 55108 phone 612-624-3423 e-mail reedx012@umn.edu This study was funded in part by a grant from the USFWS and Cooperating Agencies. Table of Contents Summary.................................................................................................. 2 Introduction...............................................................................................2 Methods.....................................................................................................3 Results.....................................................................................................4 Discussion and Evaluation................................................................................................26 Recommendations....................................................................................29 References..............................................................................................33 Summary Approximately 728 insect and allied species and subspecies were considered to be possible prairie specialists based on any of the following criteria: defined as prairie specialists by authorities; required prairie plant species or genera as their adult or larval food; were obligate predators, parasites
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Update of the Species of Copitarsia Hampson 1906, (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae: Cuculliinae)
    Gayana 67(1): 33-38, 2003 ISSN 0717-652X TAXONOMIC UPDATE OF THE SPECIES OF COPITARSIA HAMPSON 1906, (LEPIDOPTERA: NOCTUIDAE: CUCULLIINAE) ACTUALIZACIÓN TAXONOMICA DE LAS ESPECIES DE COPITARSIA HAMPSON 1906, (LEPIDOPTERA: NOCTUIDAE: CUCULLIINAE) Andrés O. Angulo1 & Tania S. Olivares2 1Departamento de Zoología. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Oceanográficas. Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile S.A. Casilla 160-C, Fax 56-41-244805, E-mail: aangulo@udec.cl 2Casilla 4040 correo 3, Concepción, Chile. E-mail: tolivare@udec.cl SUMMARY The present work is a catalogue of the species of Copitarsia Hampson, including twenty-one species from North to South America. Two species group are separated taxonomically. They are the species group turbata and the species group incommoda. Also new combinations as well as synonyms for some species are proposed. The genitalia male morphological characters of Copitarsia turbata (Herrich-Schaeffer) y Copitarsia incommoda (Walker) are illustrated. KEYWORDS: Lepidoptera. Noctuidae, Cuculliinae, catalogue, Copitarsia Hampson new combinations, new synony- mous, host plants. RESUMEN En este trabajo se presentan las especies de Copitarsia Hampson, 1906, las que suman veintiuna especies descritas, distribuidas desde América del Norte a Sudamérica. Taxonómicamente se separan dos grupos de especies: uno de ellos es el grupo especie turbata y el otro es el grupo especie incommoda. También se proponen nuevas combinaciones y sinónimos para algunas especies. Se ilustran los caracteres taxonómicos diferenciales de los machos de Copitarsia turbata (Herrich-Schaeffer) y Copitarsia incommoda (Walker). PALABRAS CLAVES: Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Cuculliinae, catálogo, Copitarsia Hampson, nuebas combinaciones, nuevos sinónimos, plantas hospederas. INTRODUCTION In the Lepidopterorum Catalogue of Poole (1989) Copitarsia Hampson and Cotarsina Species of Copitarsia Hampson are distrib- Koehler were treated separately.
    [Show full text]
  • Tese Final Sandro.Pdf
    UNIVERSIDADE DE ÉVORA ESCOLA DE CIÊNCIAS E TECNOLOGIA Departamento de Biologia Aspetos morfológicos dos insetos e sua importância na polinização Sandro Melo Cerqueira Orientador: Anabela Belo Mestrado em Biologia da Conservação Dissertação Évora, 2015 UNIVERSIDADE DE ÉVORA ESCOLA DE CIÊNCIAS E TECNOLOGIA Departamento de Biologia UNIVERSIDADE DE ÉVORA ESCOLA DE CIÊNCIAS E TECNOLOGIA Aspetos morfológicos dos insetos e sua importância na polinização Sandro Melo Cerqueira Orientador: Anabela Belo Mestrado em Biologia da Conservação Dissertação Évora, 2015 ―O que torna as coisas desconcertantes é o seu grau de complexidade, não a sua dimensão; uma estrela é mais simples do que um inseto‖ - Martin Rees, 1999. In ―Evolution of Insects‖, David Grimaldi and Michael S. Engel, Cambridge University Press Agradecimentos Em primeiro lugar gostaria de agradecer á Associação ―A Rocha‖ pela disponibilidade em fornecer os meios logísticos e técnicos necessários para a execução deste trabalho, em especial á Prof. Paula Banza pela sua ajuda e disponibilidade, por me ter passado o seu conhecimento e me ter acompanhado ao longo de todo o trabalho. Obrigado Jens D‘Haeseleer pela ajuda na identificação dos insetos e Drª Renata Medeiros pela ajuda na parte estatística. Quero agradecer á Prof. Anabelo Belo pela sua orientação, apoio e comentários. E por fim, aos meus pais e ao meu irmão, por todo o apoio financeiro e incentivo dado. A todas as pessoas que de algum modo contribuíram para que fosse possível a realização desta dissertação, muito obrigado. Índice A. Índice de Tabelas --------------------------------------------------------------------------6 B. Índice de Figuras---------------------------------------------------------------------------7 C. Resumo---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------9 D. Abstract ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------10 1. Introdução-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------11 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Features Bioecological Miridae Bugs Tashkent Region
    International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064 Index Copernicus Value (2013): 6.14 | Impact Factor (2015): 6.391 Some Features Bioecological Miridae Bugs Tashkent Region Khashimova M.Kh1, Akhmedova Z.YU2 The Institute of Plant and Animal Gene Pool, Academy of Sciences of Uzbekistan, 232, Bogi Shamol Street, 100053, Tashkent, Uzbekistan Abstract: This article demonstrates the results of study on biology, ecology and species composition of Miridae bugs and reveals their dominant species, level of their injuriousness under the Tashkent oasis conditions. And optimum amount of effective temperatures for single generation of bugs is studied. Keywords: Miridae bugs, cotton, pest, lucerne, ecology, biology, insect, phytophages, injuriousness, biological and ecological features 1. Introduction and, in many cases, it managed to be determined only after a long period after the pest disappearance. Miridae subfamily holds a specific place among Hemiptera, it ecologically relates to various biotopes and takes an In spite of the fact that distribution of bugs (especially enormous importance in biocenosises and agrocenosises. alfalfa plant) in the cotton fields of Uzbekistan caused an Dominant species of this subfamily being phytophages are alarm for a long time [6; 8] many authors repeatedly critical pest of cotton, rotation forage grasses, vegetables and specified that it was the serious cotton pest [9; 2]. Therefore, other crops, medicinal herbs and hardy-shrub species. Some it should be noted that the damage caused by bugs was species transmit dangerous viral and bacterial plant diseases. significantly underestimated at all times. Because of In addition, there are zoophages and zoophytophages insufficient information concerning their bioenvironmental among them regulating the number of various small featuresin many case it was determined only after a long invertebrates – crop pest [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of the Moth Fauna (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) of a Wetland Forest: a Case Study from Motovun Forest, Istria, Croatia
    PERIODICUM BIOLOGORUM UDC 57:61 VOL. 117, No 3, 399–414, 2015 CODEN PDBIAD DOI: 10.18054/pb.2015.117.3.2945 ISSN 0031-5362 original research article Diversity of the moth fauna (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) of a wetland forest: A case study from Motovun forest, Istria, Croatia Abstract TONI KOREN1 KAJA VUKOTIĆ2 Background and Purpose: The Motovun forest located in the Mirna MITJA ČRNE3 river valley, central Istria, Croatia is one of the last lowland floodplain 1 Croatian Herpetological Society – Hyla, forests remaining in the Mediterranean area. Lipovac I. n. 7, 10000 Zagreb Materials and Methods: Between 2011 and 2014 lepidopterological 2 Biodiva – Conservation Biologist Society, research was carried out on 14 sampling sites in the area of Motovun forest. Kettejeva 1, 6000 Koper, Slovenia The moth fauna was surveyed using standard light traps tents. 3 Biodiva – Conservation Biologist Society, Results and Conclusions: Altogether 403 moth species were recorded Kettejeva 1, 6000 Koper, Slovenia in the area, of which 65 can be considered at least partially hygrophilous. These results list the Motovun forest as one of the best surveyed regions in Correspondence: Toni Koren Croatia in respect of the moth fauna. The current study is the first of its kind koren.toni1@gmail.com for the area and an important contribution to the knowledge of moth fauna of the Istria region, and also for Croatia in general. Key words: floodplain forest, wetland moth species INTRODUCTION uring the past 150 years, over 300 papers concerning the moths Dand butterflies of Croatia have been published (e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8).
    [Show full text]